Basically, everything prior to Gerald is an elaborate forgery - a
mixture of invented relationships for historical individuals and
invented individuals. (For example, in spite of all of the efforts to
make him either a jewish exilarch or, as in this case, the male-line
heir of Clovis, there is little reason not to accept the established
parentage of this man, which leads elsewhere. Perhaps you can explain
why William's sister was heiress, when he had sons and brothers?)
taf
Gontard ?
|
Lambert DE VALENTINOIS
|
Adhémar DE VALENCE
|
Hugues DE VALENCE ca 1045-
|
Giraud D'ADHEMAR
|
Guillaume D'ORANGE
|
Thiburge D'ORANGE
JL
And at any rate, generations 4-19 are pretty much direct from that
classic, _Holy Blood, Holy Grail_.
Nat Taylor
Count Dominic O'Kelly
RDAVID...@AOL.com (David Hughes) wrote in message news:<f9785a84.0404...@posting.google.com>...
As has been discussed here in the past, large sections of this pedigree are
known to have been concocted in the 20th century as part of the notorious
Rennes-le-chateau hoax. This includes Dagobert II's alleged wife Gisela of
Razes. The authors of "The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail" are quite open
about their reliance on modern documents deposited in the Bibliotheque
nationale under pseudonyms, and about the lack of support from any other
sources.
Even Dagobert II's alleged son Sigebert is unsupported by anything like
contemporary evidence, and is not mentioned until the 10th century.
Settipani argues that the tradition of his existence arose out of confusion
with Sigebert, son of Dagobert I.
Chris Phillips
> RDAVID...@AOL.com (David Hughes) wrote in message
> news:<f9785a84.0404...@posting.google.com>...
>
...
> > = Dagobert II, King of France 676-679 [his 2nd =]
> > 05. Sigebert I, Count of Razes, claimant to French throne 751 & styled
> > self "Sigebert IV, King of France" (d758)
> > = Magdalene of Narbonne & Carcassone
> > 06. Sigebert II, Count of Razes (d768)
> > 07. Bera III, Count of Razes (d770)
> > = Alba
> > 08. Cunegonde, heiress, sis of William, Count of Razes (d795)
> > = William "Le Cornet" [aka Guillem de Gellone], Marquis of Septimania
> > 793-806, abd, d813 [his 1st =]
> > 09. Bera IV, Count of Razes 795-823
> > = Romille
...
> ... I noticed you changed the
> Plantard given pedigree, having William of Gellone marrying an heiress
> as opposed to giving them a direct Merovingian lineage, Plantard
> wouldn't be happy. ...
The hoaxster Plantard? Isn't he dead, though?
Nat Taylor
<snip>
>
>>... I noticed you changed the
>>Plantard given pedigree, having William of Gellone marrying an heiress
>>as opposed to giving them a direct Merovingian lineage, Plantard
>>wouldn't be happy. ...
>
>
> The hoaxster Plantard? Isn't he dead, though?
But in the vulgar, make-believe world of people who sign their names
with a title, surely a con-man can be a trifle peeved and dead at the
same time.
Peter Stewart
> Connecting
> these historical individuals to the Merovingians is the
> problem, then
> connecting them to Plantard.
There are several places in the genealogies of Holy Blood Holy Grail that are highly suspect. Esp. as their is apparently no reason why these people should not be documented elsewhere. I have documented a few persons where I could, but quite a number of them I can't find any reference on outside of the book itself which alledgedly relies on secret documents.
Will
> As has been discussed here in the past, large sections of this pedigree are
known to have been concocted in the 20th century as part of the notorious
Rennes-le-chateau hoax. This includes Dagobert II's alleged wife Gisela of
> Razes.
Can I add here Dagobert II himself?
In reviewing the history of this person, I have some reservations on his lineage.
What primary documentation is there that Dagobert II was really who he is claimed to be? He was spirited away at a very young age [or killed] and then much much later his mother would recognize him? It's a little too Anastasia for me to swallow.
Will
Yes, he has passed. He has a son who is still alive, but I'm unaware
of whether or not he is making the same pretensions.
Count Dominic O'Kelly
This balderdash is unwarranted and unwanted. This kind of nonsense
only has a paralytic effect on the newsgroup and distracts people from
the subject at hand. If you desire to ask me a question about how I
sign my name then by all means ask, but petty remarks are
inappropriate and uncalled for.
Count Dominic O'Kelly
There's nothing I need to ask - whether or not you may be a count is
immaterial. Unless "Count" is your legal first name or a recognised
nickname, as with the famous jazz artist Basie, then it is a vulgar
affectation to use this as part of you signature. Any count should know
that.
Peter Stewart