taf
unread,Nov 27, 2020, 9:08:12 AM11/27/20You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to
(Things have been slow of late, so . . . )
I have recently been looking at a couple of powerful Toledo families that if you just look at the senior male line, appear to have 'locked in' their patronymic as a surname at early dates. As it turns out, this is the case with neither family.
Briefly, Iberian names in this period consisted of three parts, a personal name, a patronymic form, and a toponymic or surname: Fernan Alvarez de Toledo; Pedro Gomez Barroso. However, this period represents an intermediate time when the patronymics no longer retained their original meaning, indicating the name of the bearer's father, but had not yet become an inherited part of the surname. Instead, for a span of about two centuries, they were used like part of the given name - if someone was named for a predecessor, they would often (but not always) be given the full name-patronymic combination of that namesake, thus Toledo grandee Diego Gomez named his son Pedro Suarez, after the boy's uncle, great-uncle, and some earlier ancestors (even though Diego Gomez himself was likely named for his maternal grandfather Diego Garcia, but received a true patronymic - there was little consistency though namesake naming was more common than not).
Two apparent examples of true patronymic surnames are the Garcia de Toledo and the Alvarez de Toledo. In the first a Juan Garcia who died in the late 13th century had a son Diego Garcia, the first of seven successive lords of that name, and as we also see a further Juan Garcia, a Maria Garcia and an Ines Garcia de Toledo, this name would seem to have become part of the surname, but a fuller survey of naming of children in each generation shows anything but:
1. Juan Garcia: Diego Garcia, Gonzalo Yuannes, Teresa Yuannes, Urraca Yuannes, Ponce
2. Diego Garcia I: Diego Garcia, Juana Diaz, Teresa Alfonso, Pedro, Ines
3. Diego Garcia II: Diego Garcia, Juan Garcia, Pedro Suarez, Teresa Vasquez, Maria Garcia, Ines
4. Diego Garcia III: Diego Garcia, Ines Garcia, Constanza
5. Diego Garcia IV: Diego Garcia, Pedro Suarez
6. Diego Garcia V: Diego Garcia, Diego Gomez, Mencia
7. Diego Garcia VI: Diego Garcia, Diego Lopez, Enrique Manuel, Fernan Alvarez, Constanze Manuel
8. Diego Garcia VII: Maria Manrique
Thus, the repeated use of Garcia de Toledo was not indicative of the patronymic locking in as part of the surname, which never happened. It just reflects the repeated use of the same Diego Garcia combination for the eldest son.
A family where it did lock in was the line that gave rise to the Dukes of Alba, where the surname passed down to modern times as Alvarez de Toledo. The family heads appear with the Alvarez patronymic form from the mid-13th century, yet again this was not really a case of locking in that early:
1. Alvar Yuannes: Garcia Alvarez, Juan Alvarez, Ines Alvarez (true patronymic use)
2. Juan Alvarez: Garcia Alvarez
3. Garcia Alvarez (II): Juan Alvarez, Garcia Alvarez, Fernan Alvarez (I), Gutierre Gomez, Teresa Garcia, Ines
4a. Garcia Alvarez (III): Fernan Alvarez (III)
5a. Fernan Alvarez (III): Garcia Alvarez (V), Juan Alvarez, Diego Lopez, Pedro Suarez
6a. Garcia Alvarez (V):Fernan Alvarez, Pedro Suarez
returning to the other branch:
4b. Fernan Alvarez (I): Garcia Alvarez (IV), Gutierre Gomez, Fernan Alvarez (II), Maria, Leonor
5b. Fernan Alvarez (II): Pedro Suarez, Garcia Alvarez (VI), Leonor, Maria
The son of Garcia Alvarez (IV), Fernan Alvarez (IV), was made Count of Alba, and his son Garcia Alvarez Duke of Alba - unfortunately the patronymic forms used by their siblings are unavailable to me, but it nonetheless is clear that it was not until at least when they were ennobled that Alvarez de Toledo 'locked in'. Even though the direct male line was Alvarez de Toledo for a full two centuries earlier, this again reflected the coincidence of the later noble line descending from the siblings that happened to have Alvarez as part of their namesake naming, just as we have seen with the Garcia de Toledo, only rendered a little more obscure by the use of multiple Alvarez combination-namesakes in this family, Garcia, Fernan and Juan.
So, the take-home is that even in families that appear to have 'locked in' patronymic forms in this period, it is not safe to assume that is the case, and patronymic forms should be viewed as a constituent of their given name, rather than either a true patronymic or part of a surname, unless it is clear that it has truly become part of a patronymic-surname combination given every family member.
taf