A paper read by Thomas Bush in 1898 to a group of provincial enthusiasts
is hardly an authoritative source for what is or is not in the close
roll for 1479, especially when the author clearly adjusts his translated
paraphrases given in quotation marks to suit the structure of his own
English sentences - NB on pp 61-62: 'A Gloucestershire Inquisition, A.D.
1477, shews:- "That John Kemys died ..."'; 'A Dorset Inquisition, 1477,
states:- "That John Kemys and Margaret ...'"; 'Close Roll, A.D. 1479,
states:- "That John Kemys survived ..."'. Do you suppose the syntax
represented by Bush can be found in his purported medieval sources, all
conveniently starting with "That ..."? Or the peculiar antiquarian
sidelight in a reference to John Kemys about whose daughter Maurice
Denys, the subject's step-son, had married?
There is little enough to go by on this matter, but I'm not sure what
confidence can be placed in the circumstance that Maurice Denys was
wealthy enough to marry a legitimate daughter of Edward Stradling - if
Denys was Stradling's ward and the latter had acquired the right to
arrange the former's marriage, what would have prevented the favouring
of an illegitimate daughter with a better marriage than could otherwise
be obtained for her?
Peter Stewart