Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: Lionel (or Leo) Welles, K.G., 6th Lord Welles, and his 1st wife, Joan (o...
13 views
Skip to first unread message
WJho...@aol.com
Feb 6, 2012, 11:13:58 PM2/6/12
to royala...@msn.com, gen-me...@rootsweb.com
In a message dated 2/6/2012 8:10:50 PM Pacific Standard Time,
royala...@msn.com writes:
> <<Sheffield Archives: Bacon Frank MSS, BFM/379 (Deed of partition dated
> 26 April 1487 between Sir Christopher Willoughbie, Knt., Sir Robert
> Dymock, Knt., Thomas Lawrense, Esq., Robert Tempest, Esq., (in the
> right of Dame Katherine his wife, late wife to Sir Thomas Delaland,
> Knt.) all (excepting Robert Tempest) cousins and (through their
> grandmother Jane) heirs to the estate of the late Sir Robert Waterton,
> Knt., brother to the said Jane) (available at
> www.a2a.org.uk/search/index.asp). >>
>
>
I suspect however that these parenthetical remarks, which are the only ones
to mention "Jane" were added by a modern editor of the collection.
If so, then this is of no import to the issue of what her forename was.
royala...@msn.com writes:
> <<Sheffield Archives: Bacon Frank MSS, BFM/379 (Deed of partition dated
> 26 April 1487 between Sir Christopher Willoughbie, Knt., Sir Robert
> Dymock, Knt., Thomas Lawrense, Esq., Robert Tempest, Esq., (in the
> right of Dame Katherine his wife, late wife to Sir Thomas Delaland,
> Knt.) all (excepting Robert Tempest) cousins and (through their
> grandmother Jane) heirs to the estate of the late Sir Robert Waterton,
> Knt., brother to the said Jane) (available at
> www.a2a.org.uk/search/index.asp). >>
>
>
I suspect however that these parenthetical remarks, which are the only ones
to mention "Jane" were added by a modern editor of the collection.
If so, then this is of no import to the issue of what her forename was.
0 new messages