Comments interspersed below, with apologies for the delay in responding
- for health reasons I have been absent from the newsgroup, away from
home & research materials, and my capacity for pursuing this topic now
is very limited. I will resume the interrupted series of threads when I
am up to doing more.
It would have been just a guess if Karen Nicholas had made it, but she
didn't. On the page cited she wrote:
"Richilde was forty-nine years old when she became countess of Flanders
... She spent eleven years as countess of Hainaut (1040-51), then
sixteen years with her second husband, Baldwin of Flanders, before he
succeeded his father as count Baldwin VI of Flanders (1067-70). From the
beginning of her marriage to Baldwin, Richilde actively sought to retain
her first husband's inheritance in her own hand. She placed the children
of her first marriage in the church: Gertrude entered a convent and
Roger, who is described by Gislebert of Mons as "debilitated in body,"
joined the secular clergy, from which he later was elected bishop of
Chalons-sur-Marne. Richilde then devoted all her attention and ambition
to the sons of her second marriage, Arnold and Baldwin, who were
expected to inherit Hainaut as well as Flanders. Gislebert of Mons later
criticized her for a lack of maternal feeling for the children of her
first marriage. But Roger might well have been physically disabled and
Richilde, by her second marriage, would have acted decisively at a time
when her rule in Hainaut was threatened; in effect, she turned the
disaster of her widowhood into the victory of a prestigious second
marriage to the future count of Flanders."
Becoming countess of Hainaut in 1040 does not necessarily preclude
Richilde's having been already married to Herman beforehand, as Nicholas
may have approximated the dating from the death of his father evidently
in 1039/40 (the annals of Elnone place Reginar's death in 1039 but the
chronology there is frequently inexact). There are several guesses in
the quoted passage apart from the putative dating of Richilde's first
marriage. We don't know how old she was in 1067 when Balduin succeeded
as count of Flanders, but as she was probably not older than her first
husband (whose parents were married after September 1015) she was
perhaps born ca 1020 as Henri Platelle estimated. The inheritance of
Herman had been in Richilde's hands before Balduin invaded Hainaut and
married her - there is no evidence that her son Roger was ever called
count, although he may have been old enough to rule in his own right at
his father's death if born by ca 1036 as proposed upthread. We don't
know when Roger entered the Church, but one later source says that this
was done with Herman's consent in which case there may never have been a
question of Roger's succeeding him as count. The daughter of Richilde
and Herman may or may not have entered a convent, as discussed before,
and giving her the name Gertrude is unevidenced. It is may be that
Richilde's daughter Agnes was from her first marriage.
If Roger had reached the age of 30 in 1066, by when he was a bishop,
then Richilde must have married Herman in the lifetime of his father.
For all we know she may have been chosen by Reginar to make up for some
deficiency in his son, who appears to have been merely a cipher in
Richilde's dominant career apart from an effort to ally with Flanders
against the emperor despite her opposition.
> You point out that Hermans grandparents were Hugh capet, but wasnt Baldwin VI
> also descended from him? I remember that when Henry VIII married his brothers
> widow, they had to get papal dispensation, but this affinity was more distant, so
> would the rules still apply?
Balduin and Herman were doubly related by blood, as second cousins by
descent from Hugo Capet and his wife Adelaide, and as second cousins
once removed by descent from Mathilde of Saxony who married successively
Balduin III of Flanders and Godfrey the Captive, count of Verdun. There
was no process of formally giving papal dispensations in the mid-11th
century as this had developed by the early-16th, but affinity through
the consanguinity of her two husbands was held to be a problem for
Richilde's marriage to Balduin. Affinity even through god-parenthood
could be held as an impediment to marriage, as with King Robert II and
Bertha of Burgundy - but unless politics bolstered the canonical case
Rome could not very well try to police every possible instance of
marriage to a deceased husband's second cousin.
> The sources on the net suggest that she was forced to marry Baldwin VI when he
> invaded Hainault, but as a widow with 2 small children, she might have seen him
> as an advantageous match and a protector of her position, perhaps against other
> claimants to Hainault. It did of course lead to a terrible war as the Emperor was
> outraged to see Flanders take over Hainault. Ultimately the 2 were separated after
> baldwin VIs brother Robert the Frisian seized Flanders, but Richildes descendants
> did stay in control of Hainault.
This led to the confusion of later medieval chroniclers about Richilde's
right to Hainaut, making the incorrect assumption that she must have
been born the heiress and carried it to Herman. Possibly this wrong
impression may also have been due in part to her becoming countess of
Valenciennes - if that is what happened, by some less-than-absolute
hereditary right - and so transferring comital rank to Herman before the
death of his father.