My note on Catherine says:
> Catherine's existence is called "questionable" and the line therefore "very doubtful." Per Weis, there is no contemporary evidence of her existence and the line mayhave been invented post hoc for dynastic reasons.
>
--
FWIW; AFAIK; IMHO; YMMV; yadda, yadda, yadda.
Regards, Ed Mann mailto:edl...@mail2.lcia.com
You're correct: Llywelyn and Eleanor de Montfort only had one daughter,
Gwenllian. She was sent to the convent in Sempringham as a toddler in
1283, after Llywelyn's death in December 1282. The rumour of
Catherine's existence has no basis in fact and is considered by modern
historians as just that, a rumour. It is *highly* unlikely that Edward I
would have allowed any of Llywelyn and Eleanor's children to go on
undisturbed to marry and lead normal lives after the conquest of Wales.
He placed at least two daughters of the Princes of Gwynedd in convents as
children, and did even nastier things to the sons. The man had quite a
little vendetta against both the de Montfort's and the royal house of
Gwynedd...
HTH,
Jenny
-----
talk...@hotmail.com
I'm not a witch! They dressed me up like this!
-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
Susan Hammond
Dafydd ap Gruffydd's sons Llywelyn and Owain were imprisoned; Llywelyn died
there in 1288 and Owain was still alive in prison in 1305. It is not clear
how many of Daffydd's 9 known children were by his wife Elizabeth Ferrers.
It's possible one or both sons were illegitimate, but as the sons of the last
recognized claimant to rule Wales independently of England, they might have
been reckoned more formidable potential rebels than the descendants of Daffydd
ap Llywelyn ap Iorwerth.
John Parsons