Mauduit
Mardi Carter
(Hants), and Somerford (Wilts) connect to the Hanslope family?
mbc
G . EDWARD ALLEN
1. William; d. after 1257. 3rd son.
2. Thomas of Holgate, Shropshire and Warminster; b. ca. 1182; d. 1244.
3. Elizabeth Knoville.
4. Robert; b. ca. 1130/35; d. 1191.
5. Agnes de la Mare.
6. Bogo de Knoville.
8. William of Hartley Mauduit.
9. Adelicia.
10. Robert de la Mare; d. ca. 1193.
11. Aliza.
20. Richard de la Mare of Castle Holgate, Shropshire.
Hope this helps.
Kay Allen AG all...@pacbell.net
Mardi Carter
is what I have.
I Per VCH Hampshire 4:369 Manor of Grately:
1. John Mauduit m. Juliana
2. Thomas Mauduit d. 1322
3. Elizabeth de Knoville
4. Warin Mauduit d. 1299/1300
6. Bogo de Knoville
8. Thomas Mauduit
II Per the above p 102 Manor of Shalden:
1. John Mauduit
2. Thomas Mauduit d. 1322
3. Elizabeth de Knoville
4. Warin Mauduit d. 1299/1300
6. Bogo de Knoville
8. Thomas Mauduit, successor of William
16. William Mauduit
32. Thomas Mauduit d 1244
64. Robert Mauduit d. 1191
III I also have this line from CP 8:551
1. Egidia Mauduit m. John de Moleyns
2. Sir John Mauduit, of Somerford 1281-1347
3. Margaret Poges m. abt. 1307; d. 1368
4. Robert Mauduit, held Fonthill, Wilts; d. 1288 (possibly son)
5. Alice
6. Sir Robert Poges
8. Robert Mauduit (possibly son)
16. Robert Mauduit (perhaps son)
32. Robert Mauduit, of Somerford, Wilts; d. bef. 1243
64. Robert Mauduit, of Warminster, Wilts
65. Agnes de la Mare
Are Robert II 64 and Robert III 64 the same?
I am not clear about who his/their father(s) are.
How come I have so many more generations?
G . EDWARD ALLEN
>
> Thank you for your response. I'm sorry, but I am still confused. Here
> is what I have.
>
> I Per VCH Hampshire 4:369 Manor of Grately:
>
> 1. John Mauduit m. Juliana
> 2. Thomas Mauduit d. 1322
> 3. Elizabeth de Knoville
> 4. Warin Mauduit d. 1299/1300
> 6. Bogo de Knoville
> 8. Thomas Mauduit
>
> II Per the above p 102 Manor of Shalden:
>
> 3. Elizabeth de Knoville
> 4. Warin Mauduit d. 1299/1300
> 6. Bogo de Knoville
> 8. Thomas Mauduit, successor of William
> 16. William Mauduit
> 32. Thomas Mauduit d 1244
> 64. Robert Mauduit d. 1191
>
> III I also have this line from CP 8:551
>
> 1. Egidia Mauduit m. John de Moleyns
> 2. Sir John Mauduit, of Somerford 1281-1347
> 3. Margaret Poges m. abt. 1307; d. 1368
> 4. Robert Mauduit, held Fonthill, Wilts; d. 1288 (possibly son)
> 5. Alice
> 6. Sir Robert Poges
> 8. Robert Mauduit (possibly son)
> 16. Robert Mauduit (perhaps son)
> 32. Robert Mauduit, of Somerford, Wilts; d. bef. 1243
> 64. Robert Mauduit, of Warminster, Wilts
> 65. Agnes de la Mare
>
> Are Robert II 64 and Robert III 64 the same?
Yes.
> I am not clear about who his/their father(s) are.
His father is William of Hartley Mauduit who married Adelicia. See my
other posts to continue the Hartley Mauduit ancestry.
> How come I have so many more generations?
It would appear that there are either two Mauduits who married
Elizabeths, dtrs. of Bogo de Knovilles are they grafted them.
Kay Allen all...@pacbell.net
Benjamin Hertzel
Recently there was a thread about the Mauduits of Hanslope. I believe it
ended at Robert Mauduit (died 1222) - was Robert the father of William
(died 1257), who married Alice de Newburgh?
Thank you.
Benjamin
Richard Borthwick
>>Resent-Date: Wed, 3 Feb 1999 20:10:57 -0800 (PST)
>>Old-To: GEN-MED...@rootsweb.com
>>Date: 3 Feb 1999 21:00:43 -0800
>>From: ja...@midas.millcomm.com (Benjamin Hertzel)
>>Organization: RootsWeb Genealogical Data Cooperative
>>Sender: GEN-MEDIEVA...@rootsweb.com
>>Subject: Mauduit
>>Resent-Message-ID: <"BScJ4D.A.GLG.G3Ru2"@bl-30.rootsweb.com>
>>Resent-From: GEN-MED...@rootsweb.com
>>X-Mailing-List: <GEN-MED...@rootsweb.com> archive/latest/19214
>>X-Loop: GEN-MED...@rootsweb.com
>>To: GEN-MED...@rootsweb.com
>>Errors-To: GEN-MEDIEVA...@rootsweb.com
>>Resent-Sender: GEN-MEDIEVA...@rootsweb.com
>>
>
>
ED MANN
>
> Recently there was a thread about the Mauduits of Hanslope. I believe it
> ended at Robert Mauduit (died 1222) - was Robert the father of William
> (died 1257), who married Alice de Newburgh?
Yes.
Descendants of Robert Mauduit
1 Robert Mauduit b: Abt. 1172 d: Abt. Jun 1222 ref #: (Ä84-27)
+Isabel Bassett b: Abt. 1176 ref #: (Ä84-27)
2 Sir William Mauduit aka: Baron Mauduit b: Abt. 1196 d: Apr 1257
+Alice de Newburgh b: 1196 d: Bef. 1264 ref #: Ä84-27
3 Isabel Mauduit b: Abt. 1227 d: Bef. 1268 ref #: Ä84-28
+Sir William de Beauchamp aka: 5th Baron Beauchamp b: Abt. 1197 d:
Aft. 7 Jan 1268/69 ref #: BxP:30
3 Sir William Mauduit aka: Earl of Warwick ref #: BPci:168
--
FWIW; AFAIK; IMHO; YMMV; yadda, yadda, yadda.
Regards, Ed Mann mailto:edl...@mail2.lcia.com
References:
Ä = Weis, _Ancestral_Roots_, 7th ed.
AACPW = Roberts & Reitwiesner, _American Ancestors and Cousins of
the Princess of Wales_, [page].
AAP = Roberts, _Ancestors_of_American_Presidents_, [page] or
[Pres. # : page].
BP1 = _Burke's_Presidential_Families_, 1st ed. [page].
BPci = _Burke's_Peerage_, 101st ed., [page].
BRF = Weir, _Britain's_Royal_Families_, [page].
BxP = _Burke's_Dormant_&_Extinct_Peerages_, [page].
EC1 = Redlich, _Emperor_Charlemagne's_Descendants_, Vol I, [page].
EC2 = Langston & Buck, _Emperor_Charlemagne's_Descendants_, Vol II,
[page].
EC3 = Buck & Beard, _Emperor_Charlemagne's_Descendants_, Vol II,
[page].
F = Faris, _Plantagenet_Ancestry_, [page:para].
NK1 = Roberts, _Notable_Kin_Volume_One_, [page].
Π= Hardy, _Colonial_Families_of_the_Southern_States_of_America_,
[page].
S = Stuart, _Royalty_for_Commoners_, 2d ed. Caveat emptor.
W = Weis, _Magna_Charta_Sureties,_1215_, 4th ed.
WFT = Broderbund's World Family Tree CD, [vol]:[num] Caveat emptor.
WMC = Wurt's Magna Charta, [vol]:[page]