http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/obituaries/article1171008.ece
I would imagine that makes them descended from the Plantagenets,
either Edward III or Edward I, but I don't have the details at hand on
the Barony of Grey of Codnor.
Susannah York is not currently in Leo's database. I was wondering if
anyone else has researched her ancestry.
Thanks and Cheers,
---Brad
http://www.cracroftspeerage.co.uk/online/content/GreyCodnor1397.htm
Thanks for the link, Will. Thomas Cornewall of Burford, the husband
of Elizabeth Lenthall, whose issue became (apparently) senior co-heirs
to the Barony of Grey of Codnor, was definitely descended from Edward
I:
Edward I
1) Elizabeth m. 2) Humphrey de Bohun, Earl of Hereford
2) Eleanor de Bohun m. 1) James Butler, 1st Earl of Ormond
3) Pernell Butler m. Gilbert Talbot, 3rd Lord Talbot
4) Richard Talbot, 4th Lord Talbot m. Ankarette Lestrange
5) Alice Talbot (c.1390-1436) m. 1) Sir Thomas Barre, Heir of
Rotherwas (d. 1420)
6) Elizabeth Barre (c.1415-1468) m. Sir Edmund Cornewall, Heir of
Burford (c.1382-1435)
7) Thomas Cornewall of Burford (d. c.1473) m. Elizabeth Lenthall
If Simon Fletcher was a descendant of this couple, as the current
Baron Grey of Codnor is, then he and his daughter Susannah had at
least one line from Edward I.
Cheers, ----Brad
They are called "Eleanor, Lady Newport and Elizabeth, Lady Zouche"
Does someone have a source to tell us the names of both of their husbands?
W
The obit for Simon Fletcher cited by Brad indicates that Fletcher was
unable to satisfactorily prove his claim to the barony of Grey of
Codnor. But it would still be interesting to see what his claim was
based on.
Unfortunately the Grey of Codnor article in the final published
edition of BP shows only the descent of the successful claimant and
not any other claimants. CP is no real help either, only identifying
the three potential heirs as of 1496 when the barony went into
abeyance. It's interesting that it was the senior representative of
the third of the three original co-heirs that won out - perhaps
because he had the most money to devote to the matter? I'm pretty
sure that there are living representatives of the other two co-heirs -
but maybe nobody else cared....
http://books.google.com/books?id=gLEKAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA630
The peerage and baronetage of the British empire as at present existing
page 630
that this Robert Baron Zouche was also a claimant, in his time I suppose.
Maybe linking him up can lead to new connections being spotted.
Don't believe every journalist gets it right.
David
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to GEN-MEDIEV...@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message
Lucy de Grey married Sir Rowland Lenthall of Bessels Leigh
Eleanor, Sir Thomas Newport of High Ercall
Elizabeth, Sir John La Zouche of Bulwick Northamptonshire
Evidence was presented that eleven co-heirs are in existence, they were:
". . . the representatives and co-heirs of the said Lucy Lenthall are now:
Charles Legh Shuldham Cornwall-Legh, the petitioner
John Nicholas Hatfield Brooks
James Assheton Frankland, Lord Zouche of Haryngworth
John Fitzroy Pechell Somerset
Edmund Patrick Donovan
John William Spillane
Sylvia Inis Hough
Reginald James Lashley
Lucy Josephine Phenix
Margaret Mary Bigelow
Catherine Florence Howell
with the heirs, if any, of Mary, younger daughter of 11th Lord Zouche
. . . the representative and co-heir of the said Eleanor Newport is now Richard Thomas Orlando Bridgeman, Earl of Bradford
. . . . the said Elizabeth Zouche had issue but that it is now not known whether any descendant of such issue now exists."
(i.e. private but in fact Wylde and Fletcher, these descendants had elected to withdraw their prior claims successfully defended for near two centuries)
=================================
LDS Library catalog
The Fletcher collection, ca.1160-ca.1982 : notes for the pedigrees of Fletcher and other related families in various counties of England
Fletcher's indefatigable research, revived initially by his father, was microfilmed by the LDS in 1984 and may be accessed on these films:
1239236-1239244
1239265-1239270
1239420-1239421
But those documents directly related to recent members of his own family and his client the Wylde family were not filmed being withheld until the expected claim by the Legh family - which did not take place until 1988 when the Wylde family elected to withdraw their claim.
These documents are now presumably in the possession of Ms York's children or brother.
David
> . . . . the said Elizabeth Zouche had issue but that it is now not known
> whether any descendant of such issue now exists."
> (i.e. private but in fact Wylde and Fletcher, these descendants had
> elected to withdraw their prior claims successfully defended for near two
> centuries)
>
>
Thanks. Could you explain this last remark a little more? I assume this
is your private remark to us, not part of the record you quote.
Will
David,
Thank you for this information. Am I right in understanding that
Susannah York's father claimed a descent from the co-heiress Elizabeth
Grey & her husband Sir John la Zouche, not from the co-heiress Lucy
Grey Lenthall, from whom the current Baron Grey of Codnor descends?
Leo has started on this descent for his database, and I sent him the
following info I've gathered so far on Susannah York's maternal
ancestry, which is also interesting, with lines that may be able to be
traced back to the medieval era. I'll share it here in case anyone
else wants to dig further:
Susannah Yolande Fletcher [Susannah York] (born 9 January 1939,
Chelsea, London; died 15 January 2011, Royal Marsden Hospital, London)
1) Simon William Peel Vickers Fletcher
married 1st 16 November 1933 (divorced by 1942)
2) Joan Nita Mary Bowring (born 20 January 1911, Nicosia, Cyprus;
married 2nd, 1943, Adam M. Hamilton)
3)
4)
5) Walter Andrew Bowring, CBE, Administrator of Dominica 1933-1935
(born 30 November 1875, Hastings, Sussex; died 3 November 1950)
married 3 November 1909, All Saints church, Ennismore Gardens,
London
6) Nita Maud Howey (born 25 November 1887)
11) John Charles Bowring, of Larkbeare, Devon (born 24 March 1821,
London; died 20 June 1893, Weybridge, Surrey)
married 2nd, 24 March 1866, Holy Trinity church, Paddington,
London
12) Mary Furlonger (born 25 March 1843, London)
13) John Edwards Werge Howey, of Pyt House, Tisbury, Wiltshire, Major
Bengal Army (born 20 November 1843; died 1924)
married 2nd
14) Frances Douglas Frere Presgrave (born 14 September 1859,
Kurrachee, Maharashtra, India; died)
23) Sir John Bowring, of Claremont, Devon, M.P. Kilmarnock 1835; M.P.
Bolton 1841 (born 17 October 1792, Exeter, Devon; died 23 November
1872, Claremont)
married 1st, 12 October 1816, Hackney, Middlesex
24) Maria Lewin (born 24 March 1794; died 26 September 1858, Taunton,
Somerset)
25) Charles John Furlonger, of Hyde Park, London
26) Mary Ann Beard
27) Edwards Werge Howey, surgeon, of Bromyard, Herefordshire (born 8
September 1808, Beadnell, Northumberland; died 25 October 1881)
28) Marianne Wight (born 5 December 1810; died 14 January 1882)
29) Duncan Kyd Presgrave
married 10 September 1849, Bareilly, West Bengal, India
30) Mary Isabella Brooke
So far nothing that indicates a Plantagenet descent. The Bowrings can
be traced two generations further back thru their pedigree in Volume 6
of the Visitation of England and Wales:
http://www.archive.org/details/visitationofengl06howa
Thanks again to everyone who has helped with this topic.
Cheers, -----Brad
So why was he party to the case in the first place?
> So far nothing that indicates a Plantagenet descent.
Thanks to the research of Michael Andrews-Reading, which he has given
me permission to share, there is a probable descent for Susannah York,
through her above maternal ancestor, Duncan Kyd Presgrave, from James
V of Scotland & Henry VII of England. The details from Michael are as
follows:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Brad I think there is some interesting ancestry behind (29) Duncan
Kyd Presgrave. A submitted IGI entry asserts that he was born in India
in 1828, son of Duncan and Susannah.
The father would seem to be the one of this name whose MI in South
Africa is recorded thus:
Lt. Col. Duncan PRESGRAVE Died 11-07-1841. Aged 50 years. Member of
Bengal Army.Somerset Road Cemetry, Cape Town, Cape.
http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/read/INDIA/2004-04/1082213548
The mother is said here to have been Susanna Leigh:
http://www.kindredkonnections.com/ancestry/India/Married-1831/Pr/Presgrave-family/Duncan-Presgrave-st001582-88474.html
A quick search on Google Books will find the Gentleman's Magazine
reference to her death in Brussels in 1844:
I believe the elder Duncan Presgrave is to be identified as the one of
that name baptised at Bourne, Lincs in 1785 (per IGI), son of Edward
and Ann Presgrave, notwithstanding the age given above for his death
in 1841 (perhaps his MI reads 56 rather than 50).
There was a reference in The Genealogists Magazine in 1950 indicating
that the SOG had received a chart showing the purported descent from
King William I of "Ann wife of Edward Presgrave" (she is said to have
lived 1765-1825):
http://books.google.com.au/books?id=YCo9AQAAIAAJ&q=%22edward+presgrave%22+bourne&dq=%22edward+presgrave%22+bourne&hl=en&ei=4oE3TdO1Jsyxcf3vxf8B&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=8&ved=0CEkQ6AEwBw
Edward's parents were an earlier Edward Presgrave (d 1759) and his
wife Eleanor, named in a legal suit of 1771:
http://books.google.com.au/books?id=ZE0ZAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA2704&dq=%22edward+presgrave%22+bourne&hl=en&ei=4oE3TdO1Jsyxcf3vxf8B&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCUQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false
The younger Edward was baptised at Bourne in 1754, according to the
IGI. He married at St Alphege's Greenwich (I have seen a photo of the
parish register entry on Ancestry.co.uk) on 5 February 1783 and his
wife's maiden name was Ann Clerk. She is said at various online sites
to have been a descendant of Dr John Clerk and Margaret Rattray - this
couple were married in 1720 per Burke's, and had a son Duncan (Clerk)
and a son who served with the HEIC:
Two of the sons (Thomas Clerk, 1770, and General Robert Clerk, 1797)
had wills proved at the PCC - I haven't looked at these. My guess is
that Ann Clerk was a granddaughter of Dr John Clerk and Margaret
Rattray. Since "Duncan Clerk" was a witness to the Presgrave-Clerk
marriage in 1783, it is most likely that Ann was his daughter, but
this is of course not certain.
You will see that Margaret Clerk nee Rattray has some interesting
ancestry. Her mother was the Hon. Margaret Galloway, daughter of the
2nd Lord Dunkeld, while her paternal grandmother was Elizabeth Hay,
daughter of Sir George Hay of Megginch. Her paternal paternal great
grandmother was the Hon. Anne Drummond, daughter of the 2nd Lord
Maderty and his wife Margaret Leslie. This latter couple will be found
in Genealogics. Margaret Leslie's maternal grandfather was Robert
Stewart, Earl of Orkney, the illegitimate son of King James V who was
of course a grandson of Henry VII and Elizabeth of York, and thus
possessed of multiple Plantagenet ancestors.
I therefore propose a tentative line thus:
King James V
1. Robert, Earl of Orkney
2. Lady Jean Stewart
3. Hon. Margaret Leslie
4. Hon. Anne Drummond
5. James Rattray
6. Thomas Rattray
7. Margaret Rattray
8. (Duncan?) Clerk
9. Ann Clerk
10. Duncan Presgrave
11. Duncan Kyd Presgrave
12. Frances Presgrave
13. Nita Howey
14. Joan Bowring
15. Susannah York
Cheers, Michael
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks, Michael, and thanks again to everyone who's helped with this
topic.
Cheers, ------Brad
How about the following as a royal descent for Susannah York?
Continuing from the above-mentioned Duncan Kyd Presgrave:
Duncan Kyd Presgrave
Lt Col Duncan Presgrave (1784-1841) m. Susannah Leigh
Ann Clerk m. Edward Presgrave
Duncan Clerk m. Ann Brown
Margaret Rattray (1702-1744) m. John Clerk, of Listonshiels
Rt Rev Thomas Rattray, of Craighall, Bp of Brechin and Dunkeld
( -1743) m. Hon. Margaret Galloway ( -1737)
James Rattray, of Craighall ( -1684) m. Elizabeth Hay
Hon Anne Drummond m. Patrick Rattray, of Craighall
Margaret Leslie ( -1668) m. John Drummond, 2nd Lord Maderty
( -1649/51)
Lady Jean Stewart m. (1st husband) Patrick Leslie, Lord Lindores
( -1608)
Robert Stewart, Earl of Orkney (1533-1593) m. Lady Jean Kennedy
( -1598)
James V, King of Scots by his mistress Eupheme Elphinstone
The descent of Duncan Clerk from James V follows the line set out by
Paul Theroff in his file on the descendants of Henry VII; so I presume
there are no problems with it, whereas I've derived the descent of the
Presgraves from Duncan Clerk from various postings and websites on the
Internet. I realize therefore that it may be erroneous; so I offer it
as a possibility (rather than as a statement of fact or certainty)
that others may wish to investigate further.
As for the ancestry of Susannah York's father Simon William Peel
Vickers Fletcher, the first thing to note is that there is no one of
that name in the GRO Birth indexes. The reason is that he started life
as William Peel Fletcher; the additional names must have been added at
some point later. We can see that this is the case from his entry on a
list of 'vexatious litigants' at www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/infoabout/vexatious_litigant/
(I don't know whether this link will work; it may have to be typed
into the browser) where his name is given as 'FLETCHER, Simon William
Peel Vickers (aka FLETCHER, Vel William Peel)'. Obviously 'vel' is
Latin for 'or' but someone has failed to understand that and thought
it was part of his name!
Using the census, BMD indexes and the IGI, it's possible to flesh out
some of his ancestry as follows:
1. Simon William Peel Vickers Fletcher
2. William Fletcher (1875- )
3. Mary Margaret Martin
4. William Fletcher (bapt 17th March 1831 Derby - death registered Oct/
Nov/Dec 1901)
5. Fanny Peel (bapt 21st July 1836 Derby- probably 1926) [2nd wife of
the preceding]
8. Samuel Fletcher ( - possibly 1840)
9. Mary Wheeldon
10. William Peel (bapt 25th Dec 1794 Kirk Langley, Derbyshire - 30th
Dec 1862) [source for the date of death is the Derby Mercury]
11. Esther Thorpe (bapt 1795 Derby - probably 1865)
20. Nathaniel Peal m. 1791 at Kirk Langley
21. Elizabeth Ambrose
22. Joseph Thorpe m. June 1794 at Derby
23. Esther Wheatcroft (bapt 9th Nov 1769 at Breadsall, Derbyshire -
probably 1857)
46. Samuel Wheatcroft m. 1st Jany 1744/5 at Swarkeston, Derbyshire
47. Elizabeth Roe or Lee
Nos. 22 & 23 also had a dau Fanny who was the wife of my gtgtgtgt-
uncle Adam Brindley; hence my interest. I expect it would be possible
to extend this list of answers if anyone has the time and inclination
to do so.
This list in itself does not rank (potential) claims in any order of priority though of course the petitioner, with his ancestress, is listed first.
As they made no objection to the termination in favour of the petitioner there was no need to rank them.
They were all, at that point, ranked equally and, possibly, were arranged within their individual families.
re Fletcher's personal position.
The following relates to his representations to the Committee for Privileges and the Lords of Appeal:
" . . . . . Mr Fletcher could only be heard if he claimed either to be a co-heir of the last Lord Grey of Codnor, or claimed that he would otherwise suffer an injustice if the petitioner's claim to co-heirship were upheld. In fact, Mr Fletcher makes neither claim. It is apparent from the averments in his petition that he could not be a co-heir because there are in life issue of his father's elder half-brother, Edward Fletcher. Furthermore, it is clear that there were several more senior collaterals who may have had issue, which issue would cut out that of Edward Fletcher*. In these circumstances your Lordships ruled that he should not be heard. However it is proper to point out that Mr Fletcher has performed a valuable service to this Committee by his diligence in discovering and drawing to the attention of the Crown and the petitioner certain documentary material which is relevant to the principal problem with which the petitioner has to deal and to which I shall refer in detail later**. Counsel for the petitioner very properly placed before the Committee Mr Fletcher's material, so that we were enabled to give full consideration to it.
*Wylde
**heraldic documents from the records of the College of Arms supporting the view that Elizabeth wife of Sir John La Zouche of Bulwick Northamptonshire was not her mother's only daughter.
David
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to GEN-MEDIEV...@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message