One of the quarterings of the coat of arms is
given as the arms of Rudston (argent, 3 bulls heads sable)
but the pedigree shows very few of the marriages.
Has anyone got the marriages for the main line of
the Lascelles from 1200 to 1500? And is there a
match to a Rudston in there anywhere?
Regards
Peter Freeman
University of Leeds
Rudston does not appear to be in record of the Lascelles, Earls of
Harewood family.
Sir Egerton Brydges' edition of Collins Peerage of England, London,
1812, p. 508, begins the "Lascelles, Lord Harewood" line with John de
Lascelles of Hinderskelfe (now Castle Howard) who held lands 1315. by
Johanna his wife he left son and heir;
John de Lascelles, alias Jackson, living 1492, no wife named, son &
heir:
William de Lascelles, living 1428, no wife mentioned, had:
William de Lascelles, alias Jackson,no wife mentioned, father of:
William Lascelles, alias Jackson, "of Gawthorpe" [Yorkshire] no date or
wife mentioned, son & heir:
Robert Lascelles, alias Jackson, "of Gawthorpe and Engholme-Grange in
the parish of Hovingham com. York", died 4&5 Philip & Mary, by wife Mary
Newport had:
Thomas Lascelles, of Gawthorpe & Englkehome-Grange, d. 1618, wed
Margery, dau. of Sir William St. Quinton,..
B urke's Peerage, 1885, p. 671, cites Brydges as source for its
account, there may be more nuptial details in Cokayne or elsewhere. Or
there may, of course be a clue in the new estates acquired by succesive
generations although it is not like Brydges to miss an heiress...
Possibly of interest is Brydges' footnote on p. 508: "There was a
Baronial family of this name, [Lascelles] and seated in this county
[Yorkshire]. Roger de Lascelles received summons among the Peers, as
Edw. I. See Dugd. Bar, vol. ii p. 6."
Brydges gives the Lascelles arms as" "Sable, a cross patonce within a
border, or."
Good hunting! JB
That's the one. The Visitation gives the Lascelles coat of arms, and the
8th (?) quartering is 3 bulls heads (etc). A footnote to the pedigree says
this is Rudston, but I can't see the connection. This branch of the Lascelles
looks like a junior branch, however, and so the two families could have been
socially about equal.
The only indirect connections seem to be the location - both families are in
and of the East Riding during this time - and through the family of Rocliffe.
There is a possible connection between the Rudston and Rocliffe families in
the late 15h century.
There remains the possibility that the editor of Surtees 144, faced with an
indistinct representation of the coat of arms, has simply hazarded a guess.