Two common pleas suits of 1528 feature a Hugh Abrehale – I'm trying to figure out how he fits into the Abrahall pedigree.
Both CP suits (Henry VIII, 1528: CP40no1057) are cited on the AALT site here:
http://aalt.law.uh.edu/Indices/CP40Indices/CP40no1057/CP40no1057Pl.htm
Suit 1. Hugh Abrahale and Fulk Abrahale are plaintiffs against defendant William Grey, of Upton Bishop, Gent in a complaint of trespass and taking.
Suit 2. John Abrehale esq is plaintiff versus defendants Hugh Abrehale, of Canon Frome, gent; and Fulk Abrehale, of Mighelchurche, Urchynfeld, gent – also trespass and taking.
In suit 1, I believe William Grey must be the husband of Jane Abrahall (1467), daughter of William Abrahall (1437) and Elizabeth ap Howell, and brother of John and Fulk (1469), who I further suppose must be the Fulk mentioned in this suit. (as outlined in the Abrahall pedigree described in Chas. Robinson, ‘A history of the mansions and manors of Herefordshire’ available here:
https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/A_History_of_the_Mansions_and_Manors_of/0eaa9h_IPFkC?hl=en&gbpv=0)
In suit 2, I’m speculating that this is the same Fulk as in suit 1, and that John Abrehale is his brother (per the Robinson pedigree, cited above). Likewise, I’m assuming it’s the same Hugh in both cases.
The fact that Hugh is from Canon Frome raises a question of why he was involved with Fulk, who is from Michaelchurch, quite a different part of the county (and the epicentre of the senior Abrahall line).
There is a Hugh Abrahall in Stretton Grandison, which is near to Canon Frome (Hugh d.1614; m. (1) Eliz m. (2) Jane Lovell in 1606). This Hugh may have been the son of John Abrahall of Stretton, whose 1556 will (
https://willsdb.gukutils.org.uk/HEF/WillsA.html) mentions a son, Hugh (as well as a daughter, Julyan and a brother, Thomas Abrahale of Stretton). Could the Hugh from the 1528 suits be the link to the families in Stretton?
The only other Hugh Abrahall I can find is Hugh (b.c.1480) m. Alice Rudhall, parents of Joan Abrahall who married Thomas Kyrle in the early 1500s. In his 1968 pedigree for the Abrahalls, Vernon Norr describes Hugh as ‘unplaced’ (‘Some early English pedigrees’, available here:
https://www.familysearch.org/library/books/records/item/277483-redirection)
I’m sure the full text of the two suits in question would be revealing, but my latin and paleography skills aren’t up to the task. I’m not even sure I’ve got the right images, but assume these to be the ones:
http://aalt.law.uh.edu/H8/CP40no1057/aCP40no1057fronts/IMG_6280.htm
http://aalt.law.uh.edu/H8/CP40no1057/bCP40no1057dorses/IMG_7535.htm
This is all highly speculative, I know.
Any thoughts?