Maud De Manley born Cheshire abt 1106
Her father: Roger De Manley or possibly De Manleigh or De Maule
Maud married Lorwerth "Goch" (which stands for "Red") Ap Maredudd of Wales.
The marriage took place in Cheshire in 1135. The Maredudd name goes back to
the 900's in Wales. Also, that Ap is a part of the Welsh surname.
I am trying to find Roger De Manley and see if I can link to De Maule
Peggy
BTW The Manleys were featured in a popular English BBC TV series called
"Meet the Ancestors" whereby faces were reconstructed from skulls acquired
from archaeological excavations (Roman-medieval) to get an idea of what the
person looked like. The programme also researched the village or community
to gain an impression of what was there and what it looked like at the time
of the burial of the person. In the case of the Manleys, a skeleton was
exhumed in the chancel of Poulton Chapel, Cheshire, a small Cistercian
house, (this particular branch of the Manleys lived at Poulton manor at the
time) and identified as Nicholas Manley who had requested in his will to be
buried there when he died (1520). A lady from the Cheshire family History
Society traced Nicholas' descendants who were approached by the BBC to
appear on the programme. There was an uncanny likeness between the
reconstructed skull of Nicholas and his supposed descendant, although there
was no actual proof that the skeleton was that of Nicholas Manley.
Cheers
Rosie
> HERE IS THE INFORMATION I WAS GIVEN--
> I want to see if there is anybody out there who knows about the Ansold De
> Maule of France and the change of the surname to De Manleigh, De Manlay, De
> Manley and Manley,
While I cannot formally disprove it, I find this derivation of
the name to be extremely unlikely (but typical of the 19th
century pedigree inventors). The -ley ending in an english
surname almost always comes from an English place name,
containing the Anglo-Saxon -legh (also the root of Leigh, Legh,
and Lee, as well an names ending in -legh, -leigh, -ley, -ly),
which means a grassy field or meadow of some sort (look in one of
the Place-Name Studies volumes for the precise definition. The
Mau- to Man- is also unlikely. This has every appearance of a
case where someone looked for a grossly similar looking name and
assimed a connection.
> only a few of the variants. Earliest Cheshire records go
> from De Manley to Manley. Am trying to find information on Roger De Manley,
> father of Maud. Maud married into Welsh royalty but I have lost Roger. Some
> of them end up in Scotland also. I think these heads of family were given
> land grants.
I also suspect there were several places called Manlegh, and
hence several entirely unrelated families bearing this name. I
know it is found in Cornwall and/or Devon also.
> Maud married Lorwerth "Goch" (which stands for "Red") Ap Maredudd of Wales.
That should be Iorwerth.
> The marriage took place in Cheshire in 1135. The Maredudd name goes back to
> the 900's in Wales.
Maredudd is a given name (that of Iorwerth's father) not a
surname, so as such it is deceptive to say it goes back to ca.
900. It was certainly used as a given name before that time,
while it was not used as a surname until the Welsh started using
surnames, 400-1000 years later.
> Also, that Ap is a part of the Welsh surname.
Actually not, as this is not a surname at all. Ap means "son
of", so Iorwerth ap Maredudd is simply Iorwerth son of Maredudd.
He had no surname.
> I am trying to find Roger De Manley and see if I can link to De Maule
Not likely.
taf
I would just like to say, I respect both Leo and Todd as genealogists and
as courteous men.
Could we please stop the personal attacks and get back to genealogy?
Dolly Ziegler in Maryland
Is this what SGM is meant for?
It's pitiful. Indeed!
Joe in Atlanta.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
http://auctions.yahoo.com/
Janko Pavsic
Montréal, Québec
I am a longtime lurker, but I agree completely with this writer. Keep
flames out
of public unless the subject *should* engage the community.
Al Magary
if i and others have been vicious..it is because we have seen or
experienced the underbelly of the diplomatic dragons. we just happen to
play hard ball, when a diplomat attempts to hornswoggle us.
todd and don have the ability to clean up this list. leo is not the
wide eyed innocent..and hines is hines..look at the diplomacy and charm
he's turned on the last week. wouldn't it be nice if he was that
courteous all the time. he is definately knowledgeable.
sometimes the truth hurts.
best regards
roz
----- Original Message -----
From: Roz Griston <r_gr...@dccnet.com>
To: <GEN-MED...@rootsweb.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 2:44 PM
Subject: RE: vicious attacks
> yes, dolly most diplomats are courteous and knowledgeable. i solidly
> agree with you on that statement...todd and leo are most often both,
> but they have another side,
Dear Roz,
When have I evern shown YOU another side?
if you look closely..beyond the grins and
> glad handing. look up the word diplomacy in the dictionary..it can be
> polite deception employed to achieve an ends. diplomats are very adept
> at twisting and bending the truth..spin doctoring.
====Do tell what Todd and I expect to achieve? We both help more than that
we are helped. Who is the beneficiary?
>
> if i and others have been vicious..it is because we have seen or
> experienced the underbelly of the diplomatic dragons. we just happen to
> play hard ball, when a diplomat attempts to hornswoggle us.
===Dear oh Dear Roz, what have we done to YOU? Who has been baiting Hines in
the last few weeks, trying to invite OT responses? Keep your bickies!
>
> todd and don have the ability to clean up this list.
====How? Time and time again they have explained what they can and cannot
do. What do you suggest? People being removed from the list? I believe they
can do that but they cannot stop anyone sending messages to the list. Why do
you think you get so much advertising?
leo is not the
> wide eyed innocent..
====snide remark, do spell it out.
and hines is hines..look at the diplomacy and charm
> he's turned on the last week. wouldn't it be nice if he was that
> courteous all the time. he is definately knowledgeable.
> sometimes the truth hurts.
> best regards
> roz
===Suddenly you have turned, what has happened to you?
Best wishes
Leo van de Pas
The pedigree of the Manleys of Manley is in Ormerod's History of the County
Palatine and City of Chester, v.2,p.105. It starts with Robert de Manleigh,
father of Roger de Manlegh who granted lands in Manley to the abbey of St
Werberg temp Hen III.
Cheers
Rosie
----- Original Message -----
From: "Janko Pavsic" <janko...@hotmail.com>
To: <GEN-MED...@rootsweb.com>
Todd Farmerie replied:
> While I cannot formally disprove it, I find this derivation of
> the name to be extremely unlikely (but typical of the 19th
> century pedigree inventors). The -ley ending in an english
> surname almost always comes from an English place name,
> containing the Anglo-Saxon -legh (also the root of Leigh, Legh,
> and Lee, as well an names ending in -legh, -leigh, -ley, -ly),
> which means a grassy field or meadow of some sort (look in one of
> the Place-Name Studies volumes for the precise definition. The
> Mau- to Man- is also unlikely. This has every appearance of a
> case where someone looked for a grossly similar looking name and
> assimed a connection.
It does seem unlikely that a surname would have mutated from "Mauley" to "Manley". On the other hand, Maule for Manle (or vice versa) would be a very easy misreading of the written name.
There is a discussion in Complete Peerage, vol.3, Appendix C (p.603) about variant forms of the same name arising for this reason (such as Haudlo and Andlo, Mauny and Manny, Parvyng and Parnyng). Those are presumably examples in which one form was in daily use, but the other appears, particularly in modern works, through a misreading. So that would be a question of whether Ansold was _really_ called de Maule, or whether the name could have been misread at some stage (and whether he really came from France?).
Chris Phillips