It seems to me that the first secure ancestor is in the preceding generation, Pero Bernardes, said of Sahagun, `as he was born in the monastery of Sahagun.' S y C gives his father as count Bernardo Dias das Asturias, himself the son of Diogo Rodrigues, dux of the Asturias.
I don't believe this line, frankly. Anyway, since the Meneses's sudden appearance in history show that they are already very powerful and well connected - Pero Bernardes is supposed to have married a Maya lady - they should have an exalted origin. I have then conjectured that Pero Bernardes `of Sahagun' was in fact the bastard son of Bernard de Sauvetat, abbot of Sahagun and later archbishop of Toledo.
Todd, any comments?
Chico Doria
Francisco Antonio Doria
fad...@rio.com.br
Prix Caumont-La Force 1995
Tels.: 021-547-5541/024-231-4133/021-9943-6968
Visit http://www.rio-v.com/costadoria
Visit http://www.eco.ufrj.br/cdoria
Thanks for pointing this out. In looking it in S y C I found something
else of interest to a current project on the same chart.
> It seems to me that the first secure ancestor is in the
> preceding generation, Pero Bernardes, said of Sahagun,
> `as he was born in the monastery of Sahagun.' S y C gives
> his father as count Bernardo Dias das Asturias, himself
> the son of Diogo Rodrigues, dux of the Asturias.
>
> I don't believe this line, frankly. Anyway, since the
> Meneses's sudden appearance in history show that they
> are already very powerful and well connected - Pero
> Bernardes is supposed to have married a Maya lady -
> they should have an exalted origin. I have then
> conjectured that Pero Bernardes `of Sahagun' was in
> fact the bastard son of Bernard de Sauvetat, abbot of
> Sahagun and later archbishop of Toledo.
Gonzalez has suggested a different solution to the problem (in this he
was follwed by Martinez Sopena). He states that Tello Perez was son of
Pedro Martinez de Tordesilla, and that the latter was son of Martin
Perez de Tordesilla by Mayor Perez, the daughter of Pedro Ansurez.
Unfortunately, he provides none of his reasoning nor any footnote for
the proposed paternity of Tello Perez, so it is difficult to evaluate.
Gonzalez, Julio. El Reino de Castilla en la epoca de Alfonso VIII.
(1960).
Martinez Sopena, Pascual. La Tierra de Campos Occidental: Poblamiento,
Poder y Comunidad del Siglo X al XIII. (1985).
Salazar y Castro, Luis de. Indice de las Glorias de la Casa Farnese, o
Resumen de las Heroycas Acciones de sus Principes, que Consagra a la
Augusta Reyna de las Espanas Dona Isabel Farnese. (1716).
taf
Best, Chico Doria
I can't help you with Pero Bernardes, nor can I determine the basis for
Gonzalez redirecting the Meneses descent. I did take a look at Salazar
y Castro, and the Fruela II line is the connection that we have
discussed here before. He traces them back to Ordono Ramirez and
Christina Vermudez. The latter is the daughter of Vermudo II by his
first wife. Ordono Ramirez is traditionally shown to be son of Ramiro
the Blind, son of Fruela II, but just last week I presented the argument
that the chronology for this is nearly impossible, and that Sanchez
Candiera is clearly right in making him son of Ramiro III. All of this
is moot though, since the Meneses do not trace here either way.
taf
The Meneses were so important that the duke of Caminha who was beheaded for high treason in 1641 adopted the Meneses name instead of his agnatic style Noronha (descended from the Castilian royal house). There were sayings like `to be as proud as a Meneses' and so on; many families adopted the Meneses name as a secondary name, even if they got it with several brisures in the male line (like a branch of my own, the Menezes Doria family of the - Brazilian title - baron of Loreto). So, their sudden ascent is sure very surprising.
Chico Doria