I'm trying to ascertain Joan's father who married Ernald (Arnald) de Bois (Boys). Was it Andrew de Beachamp or Ralph de Murdac (husbands of Eva de Grey)?
According to 'Standlake: Manors', A History of the County of Oxford: Volume 13: Bampton Hundred (Part One) (1996), pp. 180-183. URL:
http://www.british-history.ac.uk/report.aspx?compid=15979:
The Greys' mesne tenancy descended presumably through Anketil's son Richard to his grandson Anketil (fl. 1150) and great-grandson John (d. by 1192), both of whom granted meadows and common rights in Standlake to Eynsham abbey. (fn. 4) John's daughter and heir Eve married the royal judge Ralph Murdac, who was lord in 1192 but whose lands were forfeited in 1194 for rebellion. (fn. 5) A claim was evidently made by Guy de Dive, Murdac's great nephew through marriage, who that year confirmed the grants to Eynsham abbey, but the Crown restored the manor to Eve c. 1197, (fn. 6) soon after Murdac's death. In 1200 her second husband Andrew de Beauchamp paid 50 marks for seisin of Murdac's former lands in Northamptonshire, (fn. 7) and in 1214 he received custody of Standlake wood, which by 1230 was attached to the manor. (fn. 8) On Eve's death c. 1246 the manor was divided into four parts, three passing to her daughters Beatrice (relict of Robert Mauduit), Joan (wife of Ernald de Boys), and Alice (wife of Ralph Hareng and formerly of Alan of Buckland), and the fourth to Jolland de Neville, son of her daughter Maud. (fn. 9) It descended in quarters until the 16th century, the Boys, Hareng, and Neville quarters being held apparently of the Mauduit quarter. (fn. 10)
4 Eynsham Cart. i, pp. 87-9; Misc. Gen. et Her. 5th ser. v. 161-2, 164.
5 Eynsham Cart. i, p. 84; Misc. Gen. et Her. 5th ser. v. 164; Pipe R. 1194 (P.R.S. n.s. v), 15-16, 92; Chanc. R. 1196 (P.R.S. n.s. vii), 71, 75, 203.
6 Eynsham Cart. i, pp. 89-91; Pipe R. 1197 (P.R.S. n.s. viii), 35, 40; cf. V.C.H. Oxon. xi. 91.
7 Rot. de Ob. et Fin. (Rec. Com.), 48; Misc. Gen. et Her. 5th ser. v. 162, 164.
8 Rot. Litt. Pat. (Rec. Com.), i. 170; Cal. Chart. R. 1226-57, 121.
9 Cal. Inq. p.m. i, p. 290; for date, cf. Ex. e Rot. Fin. (Rec. Com.), i. 455. Mauduit may have had some right by 1230: Pipe R. 1230 (P.R.S. n.s. iv), 246.
10 e.g. Bampton Hund. R. 66, 68-70; Oxon. Fines, 170-1.
Lastly, if Andrew de Beauchamp is indeed the father, do I have his ancestry correct?
1. Andrew de Beauchamp
2. William de Beauchamp d. 1197
3. Joan de St. Valery
4. William de Beauchamp d. 1170
6. Thomas de St. Valery
8. Walter de Beauchamp d. 1130/1133
9. Emmeline d'Abbetot
10. William de Braose
12. Bernard de St. Valery
Thanks,
Brad