Hello list,
I have been going though my tree and trying to improve it with better
sources and dates, and one of the most troublesome is the vast
ancestry of George Home (1698 - 1760), of the Wedderburn Homes,
Jacobite rebel and later surveyor in Virginia.
His royal ancestry I am not calling into doubt, it seems to be one of
the most solid of any American colonist, its the details of his
mother's side of the family where I have encountered problems and
conflicts. It is also this side of the family that he gets his
descent from James V of Scotland. His parents are Sir George Home and
Margaret Home, daughter of a Patrick Home and a Jean Dalmahoy. Its
with Patrick that I find most of the problems.
One of the more prominent websites with George Home's large tree is
the following:
http://homepages.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~hume/tree/1349.htm
You see here he calls this Patrick Home 1st Baronet of Lumsden.
But wikipedia (usually pretty good with royal genealogy) on the page
for his father, says that the FIRST Patrick Home was Baronet of
Lumsden, not the Patrick, son of Margaret Stewart.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Home,_Lord_Renton
But then I notice that on the wikipedia page for the various Home
Baronets, it lists a different Patrick Home as Baronet of Lumdane with
the right dates, instead of Lumsden:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Home_Baronets
Unfortunately, ThePeerage website does not go far enough to cover this
generation.
There is another problem with Patrick Home's wife Jean. Look at the
birth/death date and then look at the birth dates of her children.
Shes born after her own daughter!:
http://homepages.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~hume/tree/25197.htm
This one guy with obviously wrong dates wouldnt be a problem except
that basically everyone else on the web cites the same information.
So I wonder if maybe this guy (whom everyone else seems to copy from)
just has his Patrick Homes mixed up (the Baronets of Lumsden and
Lumdane) ? But they sound like they are the same thing (Lumsden <-->
Lumdane) And then there is the obvious problem with Jean's
'birthdate'.
I could use some help with this line if someone else here has
straightened it out. Right now it doesnt make sense.
Thanks All,
Daniel J Maxwell