__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
[snip]
> 2). Who was the wife of Sir Michael de Harcla?
According to the ODNB entry for Andrew:
"Harclay [Harcla], Andrew, earl of Carlisle (c.1270-1323), soldier,
was probably the eldest son of Sir Michael Harclay (d. before 1309), a
tenant and servant of the Cliffords who later entered the service of
the crown, acting as sheriff of Cumberland (1285-98), and of Joan,
daughter of William Fitzjohn, a Yorkshire landowner, and brother of
the theologian Henry Harclay. The family name derived from Hartley in
Westmorland. "
And for Henry, although less informative:
"Harclay [Herkeley], Henry (c.1270-1317), theologian, was the son of
Sir Michael Harclay, a long-serving sheriff of Cumberland, who died
before 1309, and brother of Andrew Harclay, first earl of Carlisle (d.
1323). The family name was derived from Hartley in Westmorland."
I'd also be interested to know more about the William Fitzjohn of
Yorkshire they mention.
-Matthew
The Richard le Franceis who married the Harcla daughter (Isabel) was
the one also known as Vernon, and was progenitor of the subsequent
Vernons of Haddon; I have him down as son of Gilbert (who married
Hawise de Vernon), son of Adam, son of Hugh, who was perhaps son of
another Adam (c.1200), in turn perhaps son of Robert (c.1180). I'll
dig out the exact reference over the weekend, but it's the CWAAS
Transactions again (a long article on the family, and a later
corrigendum).
Trans. Cumberland & Westmorland A & AS New Series vol XII (1912) for
Rev FW Ragg's long article 'Maud's Meaburn and Newby: de Veteripont,
le Franceys and de Vernon'; chart p.393 summarises as I stated above
but with Gilbert as son of John le Fraunceys, baron of exchequer (d.
1267). Trans CWAAS NS XVI 167-8 corrects this to make Gilbert son of
Adam (and nephew of John) in light of a recently rediscovered deed.
[snip]
> Sarah supposedly was first married to Thomas de Musgrave of Musgrave in Westmorland, and had by him Sir Thomas de Musgrave, Knt. (? 1st Lord Musgrave, summoned to parliament in 1350) of Hartley in Westmorland whom married Margaret de Ros of Yolton in Yorkshire.
>
> Can anyone confirm if Sarah de Harcla was indeed the mother of Sir Thomas de Musgrave of Hartley in Westmorland?
>
I think that this is supported by The Complete Peerage, sub Musgrave
of Hartley; but don't have a note of their source for it. I suspect
you may have already looked there anyway!
I searched archives for the lengthy discussion the list had in 2003 concerning Harcla. I believe you noted that there was not a Phillip. Have you concluded that Gilbert was the son of John (as appears below)?
I have an interest in the Harcla-Hartley family in two avenues of research. First, what is the very real connection between Harcla and Vipont and secondly, what connection is there in the family Harcla-Hartley and the ancient family of Hartley in Lancashire?
Maude de Morville, wife of William Vipont, appears to have granted her son Ivo much of her inheritance. Ivo's children were,Robert, Lawrence, Nicholas, Joan and Jania. Ivo's heirs are difficult to discern. Nevertheless, in descent sources confirm a continues relationship with the Cliffords, Staplitons, Musgraves, Lancasters, Blencow, Penreth, Daubeney and Harcla among others.
In 1243 Joan Vipont, daughter of Ivo sued John le Fraunceys concerning trespass in Meaburn. in 1247
Robert de V. son of Ivo and grandson of Maud de Morville granted the manor of Mauld’s Meaburn to John le Fraunceys, son of Hugh that he hold to him and his heirs, rendering yearly for all services one pound of cumin (This payment was to Ivo; But there were other services. John le Fraunceys granted that Johan, daughter of Ivo should retain lands and tenements granted by her father,(The History and Antiquities of the Counties of Westmoreland and Cumberland.. )
In 1277/8 Lawrence de V. , brother to Robert, brought an assize of mort d’ ancestor against Gilbert le Fraunceys [dead], son of John, claiming that he had wrongfully entered on possession of one messuage, 97 acres of land and 20 acres meadow and the moiety of a mill in Maulds Meaburn. (Ragg). Who might the ancestor have been? Ivo had married Sybil ? and Isabel de Lancastre. I do not have a marriage for his son Robert but, Nicholas married his cousin Annabella Vipont and Lawrence married an Eda.
In 1288, Robert, son and heir of Lawrence de Veteripont...have quit claimed for me and my heirs to Sir Richard Fraunceys...whole right and claim which I had or in any way could have inn the manor of Meaburn Mauld....so that neither I nor my heirs nor any one in our name can for the future have or seek for any right or claim in any part of the same manor with its belongings. Wits: (among others)Michael de Harcla, Robert de Morvylle, Hugh de Louthir, Henry de Stavely. Wynandeswath. (“Mauld’s Meaburn, and Le Fraunceys and de Hastings”.)
Ca, 1301 Idoine de Leyburn [Idonea de V. ii], as coheir of Robert de Vipont, Lord of Westmoreland (and cousin to the line of Ivo), had as her ward, Thomas de Musgrave, son of Richard de Musgrave [d. by 1301] and his wife Christian. This Thomas, of age by 1307, when he was a commissioner to send men to Carlisle. He married ca. 1301 before he was of age, Sarah, sister to Sir Andrew de Harcla of Hartley Castle, Earl of Carlisle who died 1314. Sarah m. 2) Robert de Leyburn, sheriff of Lancashire in 1322 and 1326. CP IX.
The Vipont-Musgrave connection remained well into the 17th c. The Musgraves of Johnby Hall obtained the manor through the heiress of Stapelton of Edenhall (Margaret Vipont). William Musgrave died at Johnby in 1609.
Although the 2003 discussion seemed to dismiss the marriage of Richard le Fraunceys Vernon to Margaret Vipont, Is it not possible that there is a Vipont marriage in all this?
Thank you for your observations,
Pat
> From: "Matthew Connolly" <mvernon...@yahoo.co.uk>
> Date: 2007/03/26 Mon AM 03:21:28 EDT> To: gen-me...@rootsweb.com
> Subject: Re: Sir Michael de Harcla of Hartley in Westmorland>
> On Mar 24, 12:43 am, "Matthew Connolly" <mvernonconno...@yahoo.co.uk>
> wrote:
> > On Mar 23, 6:42 pm, <pajun...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> >
> > > I have a bit of information on the Harcla (Hartley) family since the name is often found in association with
> > > the Viponts.
> > > "Richard le Franceis, son of Gilbert, son of Philip, who in 1257 had a grant of free warren in
> > > Westmoreland and Cumberland, who was the son of John le Fraunceys to whom Robert de Vipont had
> > > confirmed the whole of Mauld's Meaburn, married a daughter of Michael de Harcla. In 1278, the king
> > > seised the lands of Michael de Harcla until it shall appear by what right and title Richard le Fraunceis son
> > > and heir of Gilbert le Fraunceis married the daughter of Michael de Harcla, being then the king's ward."
> > > The History and Antiquities of the Counties of Westmoreland and Cumberland Joseph Nicholson and
> > > Richard Burns.
> >
> > The Richard le Franceis whoIn married the Harcla daughter (Isabel) was
> > the one also known as Vernon, and was progenitor of the subsequent
> > Vernons of Haddon; I have him down as son of Gilbert (who married
> > Hawise de Vernon), son of Adam, son of Hugh, who was perhaps son of
> > another Adam (c.1200), in turn perhaps son of Robert (c.1180). I'll
> > dig out the exact reference over the weekend, but it's the CWAAS> > Transactions again (a long article on the family, and a later
> > corrigendum).
>
> Trans. Cumberland & Westmorland A & AS New Series vol XII (1912) for
> Rev FW Ragg's long article 'Maud's Meaburn and Newby: de Veteripont,
> le Franceys and de Vernon'; chart p.393 summarises as I stated above
> but with Gilbert as son of John le Fraunceys, baron of exchequer (d.
> 1267). Trans CWAAS NS XVI 167-8 corrects this to make Gilbert son of
> Adam (and nephew of John) in light of a recently rediscovered deed.
>
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to GEN-MEDIEV...@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message
>