Will I have some difficulty with this question, but it has to do with a Henry De Umfraville, who was Lord of Umberleigh, Devon about 1250. I suspect that the documents in total tell a story of the path from 1250- upwards. Umberleigh seems to underlie the riddle of who is who in the zoo for a number of families,
One of the difficulties is that some of the pedigrees were messed up on purpose because of a family squabble. So I will put it out there, my research so far and you may find this interesting or not.
The purpose of the following extensive discussion covering the families of Beaumonts of Sherwell Isle of Wight, Soligny, Wylyngton, and Bassets, their heiresses and lands, and eventual resting place, is to prove sections within each of these families’ pedigrees, and marriages.
Following the Land [Umberleigh] to prove the Pedigree of Wyllington
1. The earliest history begins with Mabel De Soligny, confirmed by British History as the Heiress of Umberleigh, benefactors to the Champernoun Family early on. This is also confirmed in Magna Britanica, Volume 6 noted below.
2. Ralph De Wyllington, who was Lord of Umberleigh in right of his wife Joan Champernowne, of Umberleigh, had at least 2 generations after him that we are missing information for. See the explanation that follows, which does concern the family of Wyllington more than Champernoun.
3. British History Online at Umberleigh Parish states that there were 2 progressive female heirs from Wylington, but that cannot be, as Umberleigh did not leave the Wyllington family nor was it partitioned by Moiety to Heiresses for many generations.
Notes – Continued:
Discussion
It was much later on that Isabel Wylington C 1375 married William Beaumont son of John Beaumont of Sherville. (who already owned Sherwell) No one argues this point, and the Umberleigh Parish article does not explain this incompatibility nor how it transferred from the 2 progressive daughters one a Wyllington to Beaumont; In fact, other records exist that contradict this. The Sir John Wylyngton (b1342), was son of Henry (1314-1349) Ralph the brother of Henrry was married to Margaret Neville according to CP this Ralph Wyllington was claiming to be of Lord of Umberleigh. This claim Cockayne complains of and places them at Cheringham. So there is some explaining to do to figure out how the Beaumont’s got the land from anybody but the Wilyngtons and it turns out that did not happen.
The Beaumont family has the following lands as a result of the Wyllington marriage and their own resources:
1. their own lands of Sherville, (See final Paragraph);
2. (Ralph II Wyllington) Lomene’s Heiresses lands at Gittesham, and
3. Puncharton’s lands at Heandon Puncherton through the Heiress Ermengarde
(marriage of Philip De Beaumont 1280 and Ermengarde Puncherton), and
4. the Umberleigh Lordship from the Soleigny, which the Wyllingtons
had all along from Champernoun); and
5. Philippa Dynham’s Blood of Richard the Fearless came (as she was Mother of the
Beaumont Heiress)
All went to John I Basset of Tehidy B 1384, through the marriage of the heiress, Joanna Beaumont born 1424 .
Ralph III Wyllington b 1239, sits at the head of the Wyllington Visitations of Devon, with his wife named Juliane Lomene, who is given by British History as the Heiress of Gittisham. In Addition, hidden behind this man, his father Ralph II b 1200 who married Joan Champernoun; behind Joan Champernoun 1200, her father William C 1260 heir of Umberleigh; his father Jordan II also Heir who married Mabel Soligny C 1125 Heiress of Umberleigh.
Sherwell remained in the Beaumont family until the Heiress Joanna, above, took it to the Bassets, thereby tying the later Sherwell Beaumonts to the Earls of Leicester. See Beaumont’s notes.
The Wylington Pedigree given on the Basset of Tehidy Visitations of Devon, 1887 Vivian is radically different that the Wylington Pedigree given at page 384 of The Parochial History of Trigg Minor that agrees with my discussion and I believe that Cockayne was incorrect in in his complaint.
The same can be said for Beaumont, and the inheritance of Heanton is next to impossible the way that the Bassets have written the pedigree.