Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Legendary King Arthur was russian prince

891 views
Skip to first unread message

Alexander Polenov

unread,
Feb 16, 2001, 6:34:43 AM2/16/01
to
This news delievered to my inbox today. I think this will be interesting to
this group:

--
Alex
============================================================
Legendary King Arthur was a Russian prince

LONDON, February 12 (Itar-Tass) - Legendary King Arthur, the pride of West
European knighthood, was, in fact, a Russian prince, who came to England
with
his warriors in keeping with an agreement he had concluded with Roman
Emperor
Marcus Aurelius. This sensational statement was made by Howard Reed, an
eminent British historian.

As a result of his long-lasting studies in Britain, France and Russia, Reed
arrived at the conclusion that King Arthur was chieftain of the tribes that
lived in Southern Russia, in the Sarmatian steppelands. These tribes, known
for their tall and blonde horsemen, reached the Danube early in the second
century and ran up against the Roman legions there. After some lengthy
negotiations, Rome was able to find common language with them and the core
of
the "barbarian" force included in the emperor's army. About six thousand
Russian warriors came to the British Isles in 175 b.c.

While working in the archives of the St.Petersburg Hermitage Museum, Reed
found numerous symbols from burial mounds on the territory of Russia, which
are identical to those on the banners under which the soldiers of legendary
King Arthur had fought.

Phyllis Stager

unread,
Feb 16, 2001, 7:07:56 AM2/16/01
to
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------29359BDE0E42DE2FF8660032
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

My first reaction: Howard Reed needs vetting. Secondly: Don't tell Geoffrey
Ashe, as he will have a conniption fit. phs

Alexander Polenov wrote:

--------------29359BDE0E42DE2FF8660032
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii;
name="uffington.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Card for Phyllis Stager
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="uffington.vcf"

begin:vcard
n:Stager;Phyllis
tel;work:http://home.earthlink.net/~uffington/
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
adr:;;;;;;
version:2.1
email;internet:uffi...@earthlink.net
fn:Phyllis Stager
end:vcard

--------------29359BDE0E42DE2FF8660032--

PDel...@aol.com

unread,
Feb 16, 2001, 7:17:19 AM2/16/01
to
Does Eminent = Newsworthy or Noteworthy - is there a difference, OR does it
mean with a solid reputation for valid in depth and corroborative studies?
Peter de Loriol

74 Elms Road
London, SW4 9EW, GB
Fax: (0)207 622 4505
Tel : (0)207 622 9623

Ian Cairns

unread,
Feb 16, 2001, 9:47:24 AM2/16/01
to
If King Arthur is legendary, as the article admits, how does anyone know the
actual appearance of his soldiers' banners??

Ian


"Alexander Polenov" <nob...@narod.ru> wrote in message
news:007801c0980c$78d924a0$84e8dcc2@alex...


> This news delievered to my inbox today. I think this will be interesting
to
> this group:
>
> --
> Alex
> ============================================================

> While working in the archives of the St.Petersburg Hermitage Museum, Reed

Willette Smith

unread,
Feb 16, 2001, 1:42:05 PM2/16/01
to
But were they with a Golden Dragon or a RED Dragon??Willette

Chris Bennett

unread,
Feb 16, 2001, 2:23:40 PM2/16/01
to

Alexander Polenov <nob...@narod.ru> wrote in message
news:007801c0980c$78d924a0$84e8dcc2@alex...

This is not actually a new theory, even though it does seem pretty bizarre.
I can't cite the references, but I recall reading about 20 years ago a
similar proposal, based on the fact that Marcus Aurelius sent a detachment
of Sarmatian auxiliaries (from what is now the Ukraine) to Britain in about
175 (AD not BC) to serve under a certain L. Artorius Castrus (?), who was
argued to be the original king Arthur. I think it was tied into a legendary
cycle from the Caucasus about the noble deeds of a bunch of Sarmatian
warriors called Narts, hence a British newspaper headline about the Narts of
the Round Table... Sorry for the vagueness, I'm sure someone can provide
more detailed information about this.

Chris


Stewart Baldwin

unread,
Feb 16, 2001, 5:02:09 PM2/16/01
to
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001 11:23:40 -0800, "Chris Bennett"
<cben...@adnc.com> wrote:

>This is not actually a new theory, even though it does seem pretty bizarre.
>I can't cite the references, but I recall reading about 20 years ago a
>similar proposal, based on the fact that Marcus Aurelius sent a detachment
>of Sarmatian auxiliaries (from what is now the Ukraine) to Britain in about
>175 (AD not BC) to serve under a certain L. Artorius Castrus (?), who was
>argued to be the original king Arthur. I think it was tied into a legendary
>cycle from the Caucasus about the noble deeds of a bunch of Sarmatian
>warriors called Narts, hence a British newspaper headline about the Narts of
>the Round Table... Sorry for the vagueness, I'm sure someone can provide
>more detailed information about this.

There are two essays on the subject in the first and second issues of
the online periodical "The Heoric Age" which can be found (with some
bibliographical references) at:

http://www.mun.ca/mst/heroicage/list.html

While Lucius Artorius Castus did in fact exist, I always found the
arguments attempting to turn him into a prototype of a supposedly
historical King Arthur to be far-fetched. Not too surprisingly,
Arthur enthusiasts have produced variants of the theory. One silly
version that I saw once, in a source that I unfortunately [or
fortunately? :-)] do not recall, postulated a whole dynasty of men
named Arthur/Artorius, with a genealogical table extending from the
second century Lucius Artorius Castus to a supposedly "real" King
Arthur in the sixth century.

Stewart Baldwin

A Tsar Is Born

unread,
Feb 16, 2001, 9:19:39 PM2/16/01
to

"Alexander Polenov" <nob...@narod.ru> wrote in message
news:007801c0980c$78d924a0$84e8dcc2@alex...
> This news delievered to my inbox today. I think this will be interesting
to
> this group:

Of interest, certainly.
But you ARE pulling our collective leg, now, aren't you, Sasha?


> LONDON, February 12 (Itar-Tass) - Legendary King Arthur, the pride of West
> European knighthood, was, in fact, a Russian prince, who came to England
> with
> his warriors in keeping with an agreement he had concluded with Roman
> Emperor
> Marcus Aurelius. This sensational statement was made by Howard Reed, an
> eminent British historian.

Never heard of him. Eminent for WHAT?


> About six thousand
> Russian warriors came to the British Isles in 175 b.c.

Which is to say, 325 years before Marcus Aurelius. Hmm.


>
> While working in the archives of the St.Petersburg Hermitage Museum, Reed
> found numerous symbols from burial mounds on the territory of Russia,
which
> are identical to those on the banners under which the soldiers of
legendary
> King Arthur had fought.

I'll bet. Some are probably identical to those used by the Templars and the
Sanskrit-speaking conquerors of Harappa, not to mention the Olmecs ... I
have just one question: What was Atlantis doing while all this was going on?

Jean Coeur de Lapin
Holder of the Dion Fortune Chair in Creative History
University of Merlinford, Lyonesse-Under-Sea

Glub glub.

D. Spencer Hines

unread,
Feb 16, 2001, 10:27:30 PM2/16/01
to
"King Arthur was a Russian."

I LOVE IT.

And the Russians also invented the telephone, the airplane and Yorkshire
pudding.

Za Mir y Druzhbu.
--

D. Spencer Hines

Lux et Veritas et Libertas

"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do
nothing." -- Attributed to Edmund Burke [1729-1797]

"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall one
by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle." -- Edmund
Burke -- Thoughts on the Cause of the Present Discontents [April 23,
1770]

"You could not stand five minutes with that man [Burke] beneath a shed
while it rained, but you must be convinced you had been standing with
the greatest man you had ever seen." Samuel Johnson [1709-1784],
_Johnsonian Miscellanies [1897], edited by G.B. Hill, vol. 1, p.290

"On résiste à l'invasion des armées; on ne résiste pas à l'invasion des
idées."

Victor Hugo

All replies to the newsgroup please. Thank you kindly.

All original material contained herein is copyright and property of the
author. It may be quoted only in discussions on this forum and with an
attribution to the author, unless permission is otherwise expressly
given, in writing.

Vires et Honor

"A Tsar Is Born" <ench...@herodotus.com> wrote in message
news:3a8de...@news.starnetinc.com...


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----

Alexander Polenov

unread,
Feb 17, 2001, 8:38:56 AM2/17/01
to
Hello,


>
> "Alexander Polenov" <nob...@narod.ru> wrote in message
> news:007801c0980c$78d924a0$84e8dcc2@alex...

> > This news delievered to my inbox today. I think this will be interesting
> to
> > this group:
>

> Of interest, certainly.
> But you ARE pulling our collective leg, now, aren't you, Sasha?

You're right my farther and mother call me Sasha, my friends calls me Sanny
or Sania

>
> > LONDON, February 12 (Itar-Tass) - Legendary King Arthur, the pride of
West
> > European knighthood, was, in fact, a Russian prince, who came to England
> > with
> > his warriors in keeping with an agreement he had concluded with Roman
> > Emperor
> > Marcus Aurelius. This sensational statement was made by Howard Reed, an
> > eminent British historian.
>

> Never heard of him. Eminent for WHAT?

"eminent British historian" they wrote... I don't know his too... I've
only post email from my box...


> > About six thousand
> > Russian warriors came to the British Isles in 175 b.c.
>

> Which is to say, 325 years before Marcus Aurelius. Hmm.

Of course a.c. instead b.c. you should know it.

> > While working in the archives of the St.Petersburg Hermitage Museum,
Reed
> > found numerous symbols from burial mounds on the territory of Russia,
> which
> > are identical to those on the banners under which the soldiers of
> legendary
> > King Arthur had fought.
>

> I'll bet. Some are probably identical to those used by the Templars and
the
> Sanskrit-speaking conquerors of Harappa, not to mention the Olmecs ... I
> have just one question: What was Atlantis doing while all this was going
on?

Who are your Atlantis? I've heard they are bul-bul.... long-long time
before Arthur... What is Harappa and Olmecs?

--
Alex

norenxaq

unread,
Feb 17, 2001, 12:52:19 PM2/17/01
to

>
> >
> > I'll bet. Some are probably identical to those used by the Templars and
> the
> > Sanskrit-speaking conquerors of Harappa, not to mention the Olmecs ... I
> > have just one question: What was Atlantis doing while all this was going
> on?
>
> Who are your Atlantis? I've heard they are bul-bul.... long-long time
> before Arthur... What is Harappa and Olmecs?
>
> --
> Alex

Harappa was a city of the Indus Valley Civilization that collapsed around 1500
BC. The Olmecs were a culture around the Yucatan Peninsula that pre-date the
Mayans. I believe they began c.1000 BC, give or take a few centuries

Message has been deleted

lyo...@gmail.com

unread,
Mar 18, 2018, 3:00:27 AM3/18/18
to
https://www.theguardian.com/books/2001/mar/11/historybooks.features
The historian's name is Howard Reid. By his opinion "Arthur came from one of the nomadic tribes attacking the declining Roman Empire from the east. These were not Huns, Vandals or Goths, but the less familiar Alans, tall, blond tourists arriving in Europe by horse." Howard Reid did not mention "russians" in any variants or Slavs. However his origin could be Scythians.
There is another book by Littleton S., Malcor L. "From Scythia to Camelot: Radical Reassessment of the Legends of King Arthur, the Knights of the Round Table and the Holy Grail" (2000) with a similar point.

taf

unread,
Mar 18, 2018, 1:21:35 PM3/18/18
to
On Sunday, March 18, 2018 at 12:00:27 AM UTC-7, lyo...@gmail.com wrote:

> The historian's name is Howard Reid. By his opinion "Arthur came from one
> of the nomadic tribes attacking the declining Roman Empire from the east.
> These were not Huns, Vandals or Goths, but the less familiar Alans, tall,
> blond tourists arriving in Europe by horse." Howard Reid did not mention
> "russians" in any variants or Slavs. However his origin could be Scythians.
> There is another book by Littleton S., Malcor L. "From Scythia to Camelot:
> Radical Reassessment of the Legends of King Arthur, the Knights of the Round
> Table and the Holy Grail" (2000) with a similar point.

The entire 'historical record' of 'king' Arthur consists of a list of battles he supposedly fought and a passing references in a late source that reports a military victory without providing any further details. This 'theory' is simply a book marketing scheme in disguise, nothing more.

taf
0 new messages