Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

MacNamara Arms,... (Re: Beautiful Oil Painting...)

2 views
Skip to first unread message

JPM...@aol.com

unread,
Apr 13, 2002, 1:55:53 AM4/13/02
to
I'm not too sure that the College of Arms has the oldest coats of arms, it
has the oldest registered coats of arms. One thing I have seen with
MacNamara, the college is showing a feathered helmut for the crest. The
famous Irish MacNamara band has this emblem on their albums-CDs. I have a
MacNamara book written by a N.C. MacNamara in 1898 and the crest shown in
book is the 'naked forearm holding a scimitar', which is what is seen on some
Mac websites, and what I have seen in other books and at home when growing
up. Incidentally, the Sheedy-MacSheedy arms is very similar also having the
scimitar.

Jim McNamara


In a message dated 4/12/02 9:03:36 PM Pacific Daylight Time, ma...@aol.com
writes:


> Just add some meat to the discussion. There are some recognition of arms or
> at
> least initial granting of arms in a somewhat different manner.
>
> Knights Dubbed 1565-1616 GO Mss 51
> includes O'Cahan, Maguire and others.
>
> This may not be a full armory at the time, but it does give an inkling that
> familial arms were in use. It is interesting to note that the official
> grant
> of arms to Maguire some time before the knighting...
>
> Hugh Magwier niles in extia cathederali Sta de miduidue Fermatis dublinelie
> 14
> Jun 1590 (he was knighted in 14 Jan 1599 by Sir William FitzWilliams).
>
> The arms depicted/described are not the same as those today. It seems that
> the
> crest became the arms.
>
> Anways... I don't if this proves one side of the arguement or other, it is
> just
> that I had a reference worth mentioning.
> Slan Leat!
>
> Phil McManus
>

Sean MacLochlainn

unread,
Apr 13, 2002, 5:36:39 AM4/13/02
to
<JPM...@aol.com> wrote in message news:121.f3cfa6...@aol.com...

> I'm not too sure that the College of Arms has the oldest coats of arms, it
> has the oldest registered coats of arms.

Coats of arms were alien to the Gaelic Irish. Gaelic manuscripts cover a
wide range of subjects, law to medicine to genealogy to classics, but I know
of none before circa 1700 that concerns itself with coats of arms. A few
Gaelic families are recorded as having banners, but that is not the same
thing as a coat of arms.

A bare assertion that a Gaelic coats of arms existed well before it was
recorded is wishful thinking.

Sean


Trish Syme and Steven Degnian

unread,
Apr 15, 2002, 8:12:09 AM4/15/02
to
Or for that matter the assumption that they never existed is also wishfull
thinking.
Just because you cannot find it does not make it law.

--

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Steve Degnian
Looking for :-
Degnian Degnen Deignan Duignan
Magarry, Shipway, Strandquist, Peres
White
In and around Maryborough, Queensland, Australia.

Strandquist
from Sweden

Peres
from France


"Sean MacLochlainn" <macloc...@oceanfree.net> wrote in message
news:K_St8.7367$e5.4...@news.indigo.ie...


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.323 / Virus Database: 180 - Release Date: 8/02/2002


Sean MacLochlainn

unread,
Apr 15, 2002, 9:36:51 AM4/15/02
to
"Trish Syme and Steven Degnian" <kait...@cyberwizards.com.au> wrote in
message news:10188738...@mail.cyberwizards.com.au...

> > A bare assertion that a Gaelic coats of arms existed well before it was
> > recorded is wishful thinking.

> Or for that matter the assumption that they never existed is also wishfull


> thinking.
> Just because you cannot find it does not make it law.

I'm not the one making assumptions. You appear to be a stranger to critical
thinking. Do you assume that your ancestry is:

Steve
|
Steve
|
Steve
|
Steve
|
Steve
|
Steve
|
etc

After all, you are called Steve and you do have ancestors.

Sean


Sean MacLochlainn

unread,
Apr 15, 2002, 9:42:06 AM4/15/02
to
"Sean MacLochlainn" <macloc...@oceanfree.net> wrote in message
news:ZHAu8.7829$e5.4...@news.indigo.ie...

> I'm not the one making assumptions. You appear to be a stranger to
critical
> thinking. Do you assume that your ancestry is:
>
> Steve
> |

> etc

Or perhaps

Steve
|
Sir Steve
|
Lord Steve
|
King Steve
|
Emperor Steve
|
God Steve

I cannot disprove this. It is for you to prove it. Get the idea?

Sean


0 new messages