Legal Warning to Camille E. Klein

[ze...@alt.net]

In article <33a4e75b...@128.200.15.230>,
Pr...@ni.net (Jeffrey (Prime) Smith) wrote:
>
> On Sun, 15 Jun 1997 19:53:41 -0500, "S.P." <re...@by.posting.please>
> wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> >From what I hear, you sick, twisted, Communist fantasy fighter of the
> >Battletech wars, you have these emails at your web page.
> >"cap...@winternet.com" and "c...@mercury.interpath.com." Do they work?
> >No. You sick Kommunist kook.
>
> As enjoyable as flaming this loon is, I have more important things to
> do with my time (it's about time I got around to alphabatizing my
> CD's, and I still have to find my lucky silver dollar). Therefore,
> consider the following my last comment, unless he states something
> even more stupid that he has to date - which would be difficult.
>
> Note that I do not check Flamer - nothing that has been stated by this
> moron to date is good enough to be considered a flame
>

Just who drafted this latest form here?

> ------------------------------cut here-------------------------------
>
> STANDARDIZED BONEHEAD REPLY FORM, Version 1.4
> (c) copyright 1999 by
> someone else.
>
> (check all boxes that apply)
>
> Dear:
>
> [ ] Clueless Newbie [X] Lamer [ ] Flamer
> [ ] Loser [X] Spammer [X] Troller
> [ ] "Me too" er [ ] Pervert [X] Geek
> [X] Freak [ ] Nerd [ ] Elvis
> [X] Racist [ ] Fed [ ] WaReZ D00D
> [X] Fundamentalist [ ] Satanist [ ] Biased Reporter
> [ ] Stereotypical AOLer [ ] "Expert"
> [X} Unbearably self-righteous person [ ] Hypocrite
> [ ] IBM/Mac Bigot [X] Apologist [ ] Revisionist
> [ ] Scientologist [X] Evolutionary Dead End
> [ ] Meower [ ] Clueless Administrator
> [X] Militia Nut
> I took exception to your recent:
>
> [ ] Email [X] Post to __the news.admin heirarchy____.
> [ ] "News" article
>
> It was (check all that apply):
>
> [X] Lame [X] Stupid [X] Abusive
> [X] Clueless [X] Idiotic [X] Brain-damaged
> [X] Imbecilic [X] Arrogant [X] Malevolent
> [ ] Contemptible [X] Libelous [ ] Ignorant
> [ ] Nauseating [X] Stupid [ ] Fundamentalist
> [X] Boring [ ] Dim [X] Cowardly
> [X] Deceitful [ ] Demented [ ] Self-righteous
> [ ] Crazy [ ] Weird [X] Hypocritical
> [ ] Loathsome [ ] Satanic [ ] Despicable
> [X] Belligerent [X] Mind-numbing [ ] Maladroit
> [X] Assinine [X] Pointless [X] Annoying
> [ ] Much longer than any worthwhile thought of which you may be
> capable.
>
> Your attention is drawn to the fact that:
>
> [ ] You Spammed
> [X] You defended someone who Spammed.
> [ ] You Spammed, and did a very poor job of framing someone else
> [ ] You doubtlessly violated the Terms of Service of your ISP
> [ ] You posted what should have been emailed
> [ ] You obviously don't know how to read your newsgroups line
> [ ] You obviously know nothing about the topic at hand
> [ ] You are trying to make money on a non-commercial newsgroup
> [ ] You are placing your profits above fundamental ethics
> [X] You self-righteously impose your religious beliefs on others
> [X] You self-righteously impose your racial beliefs on others
> [X] You made a blanket statement without backing it up
> [X] You made unwarranted assumptions
> [ ] You posted a "news article" without bothering to do basic
> research
> [ ] You posted a binary in a non-binaries group
> [ ] You don't know which group to post in
> [ ] You made a post and didn't say anything
> [X] You posted something totally uninteresting
> [ ] You crossposted to *way* too many newsgroups
> [X] I don't like your tone of voice
> [ ] You are the reason some groups are moderated
> [ ] You posted in HTML
> [ ] You used the phrase "Information Superhighway"
> [ ] You cannot recognize sarcasm
> [X] You made an error and blamed someone else
> [ ] You flamed someone for a spelling error.
> [ ] And you misspelled something in the process
> [ ] What you posted has been done before.
> [ ] Not only that, it was also done better the last time.
> [ ] You quoted an *entire* post in your reply
> [X] You quoted nothing, so nobody knows what you refer to
> [X] You started a long, stupid thread
> [X] You continued spreading a long stupid thread
> [ ] Your post is absurdly off topic for where you posted it
> [ ] You posted a followup to crossposted robot-generated spam
> [ ] You posted a URL that had nothing to do with the subject header
> [ ] You posted a "test" in a discussion group rather than in alt.test
> [ ] You posted a "YOU ALL SUCK" message
> [X] You posted low-IQ flamebait
> [X] You posted a blatantly obvious troll
> [ ] You followed up to a blatantly obvious troll
> [ ] You said "me too" to something
> [ ] You posted a "FAQ" that contains deliberately misleading
> information
> [X] You make no sense
> [ ] Your sig/alias is dreadful
> [ ] It contains stupid song lyrics
> [ ] It contains a stupid "witty" quote
> [ ] It contains worthless ASCII graphics
> [ ] Your sig is longer than the body of your message
> [ ] You posted a phone-sex ad
> [ ] You posted a stupid pyramid money making scheme
> [ ] You claimed a pyramid-scheme/chain letter for money was legal
> [ ] You argued that spamming was legal, even though nobody claimed it
> wasn't
> [ ] Your margin settings (or lack of) make your post unreadable.
> Each line
> just goes on and on, not stopping at 75 characters, making it hard to
> read.
> [ ] You posted in ELitE CaPitALs to look k0OwL
> [ ] You failed
> [ ] Miserably
> [ ] You posted a message in ALL CAPS, and you don't even own a TRS-80
> [ ] Your post was FULL of RANDOM CAPS for NO APPARENT REASON
> [ ] You referred to the Usenet Cabal (There is no Cabal)
> [ ] You attempted a deliberate invocation of Goodwin's Law
> [X] You have greatly misunderstood the purpose of this newsgroup.
> [X] You have greatly misunderstood the purpose of the Internet.
> [X] You have greatly misunderstood the purpose of email
> [X] You have greatly misunderstood the purpose of communication
> [X] You are a loser.
> [X] This has been pointed out to you before.
> [ ] You believe O.J. Simpson is innocent
> [X] You have a direct genetic link to:
> [X] Sanford Wallace
> [ ] Phil Lawlor
> [X] John Grubor
> [ ] Walter Rines
> [ ] Zach Everett
> [ ] Steven Boursy
> [ ] ___other___
> [ ] You are one of the scuzzwipes from:
> [ ] the Woodside Literary Agency
> [ ] the Copy Cat Shop
> [ ] the Meow Brigade
> [ ] the Kook Kabal
> [ ] You didn't do anything specific, but appear to be so generally
> worthless that you are being flamed on general principles.
>
> It is recommended that you:
>
> [X] Get a clue
> [X] Get a life
> [X] Go away
> [X] Grow up
> [X] Act something close to your age
> [X] Never post again
> [X] Smoke less of what you are smoking
> [ ] Consider how low the tolerance on the Internet is for Spam
> [X] Become Sanford Wallace's love slave
> [ ] Read every newsgroup you posted to for a week
> [X] stop reading Usenet news and get a life
> [X] stop sending Email and get a life
> [X] Bust up your modem with a hammer and eat it
> [X] Have your medication adjusted
> [X] Go to the top of a building and attempt to defy gravity
> [X] Jump into a bathtub while holding your monitor
> [X] find a volcano and throw yourself in
> [X] get a gun and shoot yourself
> [X] poke your eye out with a stick
> [ ] Actually post something relevant
> [ ] Read the FAQ
> [X] stick to FidoNet and come back when you've grown up
> [X] Apologize to everybody in this newsgroup
> [X] Attempt to win this year's Darwin Award
> [ ] Do not pass along yout genes
> [ ] consume excrement
> [X] consume excrement and thus expire
> [X] Perform solitary sexual congress
> [ ] Post your tests to alt.test/misc.test
> [ ] Put your home phone number in your ads from now on
> [X] Don't bother getting a new account when this one is pulled
> [X] Refrain from posting until you have a vague idea what you're
> doing
>
> In Closing, I'd Like to Say:
>
> [X] You need to seek psychiatric help
> [X] Expect to lose your account
> [X] Take your gibberish somewhere else
> [X] *plonk*
> [X] Learn how to post or get off the usenet
> [X] Learn the purpose of email
> [X] Take a basic economics course
> [X] Go back to school and actually learn something
> [ ] Your mother wears army boots
> [ ] You are possibly the most annoying person currently alive
> [ ] _____other______
> [ ] Most of the above
> [ ] All of the above
> [X] Some of the above, not including All of the above
> [ ] You are so clueless that I didn't even bother filling in this
> form.
>
> ------------------end "standardized form"----------------------------
>
> **** **** **** ****
> Fight the Woodside Literary Agency!
> Support the Jayne Hitchcock HELP fund
> http://www.geocities.com/~hitchcockc/story.html#fund
> RE...@worldnet.att.net loves spam, and hates you and me.

-------------------==== Posted via Deja News ====-----------------------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Post to Usenet

[Jeffrey (Prime) Smith]

On Mon, 16 Jun 1997 12:12:08 -0600, ze...@alt.net wrote:

>
>Just who drafted this latest form here?

I did, with the assistance of the residents of
news.admin.net-abuse.email

[kibo greps]

In alt.webgod Jeffrey (Prime) Smith <Pr...@ni.net> wrote:
: On Mon, 16 Jun 1997 12:12:08 -0600, ze...@alt.net wrote:

: >
: >Just who drafted this latest form here?

: I did, with the assistance of the residents of
: news.admin.net-abuse.email

Then put your fucking name at the bottom of it.

: **** **** **** ****

: Fight the Woodside Literary Agency!
: Support the Jayne Hitchcock HELP fund
: http://www.geocities.com/~hitchcockc/story.html#fund
: RE...@worldnet.att.net loves spam, and hates you and me.

You know how famous you have now made Sanford Wallace and
Phil Lawler? They never used to be on that form, which has
been around for at least five years.

--
-=| KIBO is EVERYWHERE! |=-

[Jeffrey (Prime) Smith]

On 22 Jun 1997 16:32:42 GMT, kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> wrote:

>: >Just who drafted this latest form here?
>
>: I did, with the assistance of the residents of
>: news.admin.net-abuse.email
>
>Then put your fucking name at the bottom of it.
>

Why? I did not write it for personal gratification, it is my gift to
the world...

<snip>

>You know how famous you have now made Sanford Wallace and
>Phil Lawler? They never used to be on that form, which has
>been around for at least five years.

Spamford and Lawlor don't need my assistance to get bad publicity,
they do so well all by themselves. Methinks there are OTHER names on
that list you find offensive....