Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

ZIONAZI THUGS DESTROYING LIBERAL INTERNET

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Venceremos

unread,
Mar 6, 2007, 8:10:22 PM3/6/07
to
Friday, March 02, 2007
Jewish Militant Thugs Are Destroying Liberal Internet Forums
The latest death toll figures from Hurricane Katrina can be seen on
this website here.

We write quite a bit on this blog about Jewish Zionist thugs and the
gangster role they play in US society. It is due to the psychopaths in
the Jewish Israeli Lobby that America has gotten so wrapped up in the
Middle East as a supporter of the KKK-Jews in Israel and their
criminal wars in the region.

Some question whether the Israeli Lobby is really a Jewish Lobby,
pointing to Christian Zionist support for Israel. True, Christian
Zionists do support Israel, but they do little political lobbying for
Israel, and this is what it is all about (see this article by Jeff
Blankfort, who is Jewish, or really any article by him, for more.
Blankfort is the Pope of the Anti-Jewish Lobby Crowd).

The Israeli Lobby is all about Jewish money, and I mean Big Jewish
Money, not Joe Finkelstein, the librarian down the street, giving $25.
Only 2% of the US population, Jews make up 25-30% of its wealthiest
members.

That's no reason to hate Jews. Even if you hate the rich ones, what do
they have to do with Joel Cohen, the small businessman next door?
Nothing. He's not a member of the Jewish Millionaires Club, and they
don't give him a check.

Jewish money (generally meant to mean Big Jewish Money) is 60% of
Democratic Party money and 35% of Republican Party money. Money talks
and bullshit walks. Big Jewish Money is so powerful in US party
politics that they are able to dictate the terms on various issues -
in particular, US foreign policy in the Middle East (read: unstinting
support for the KKK-Jewish state of Israel).

Jewish domination of our media is quite helpful too in furthering the
aims of the Jewish Lobby. If anyone bucks the Jewish Lobby, the
heavily-Jewish media can be counted on to massacre the miscreants in
the press. As the media has the power of life and death over US
politicians, most US politicians live in terror of bucking the Jewish
Lobby and getting creamed by Lobby journalists in the press.

There is ample evidence that when US politicians buck the Lobby, the
Lobby's press members go to work on them. The result typically is the
destruction of the politician or a serious drop in his poll numbers.

Jewish control over the US media was initiated via a conspiracy that
took place from about 1890-1920 in the US. At the time, the US media
was largely in the hands of Gentiles, many of whom were savage White
Gentile racists (See the movie Birth of the Nation for an idea of
their mindset).

At the time, there was some serious Jewish money consolidating in the
US, mostly back East, while at the same time, most US Jews were
terribly poor and living in de facto ghettos, also mostly back East.

This poverty, incidentally, is what gave rise to the Jewish role in
the US Left and Labor Movement. While other ethnics may just grin and
bear it when exposed to capitalist hyperexploitation, US Jews took
offense to being downtrodden proletarians and organized to do
something about it. Subsequent generations of Jews never forgot their
impoverished origins and have remained on the liberal-Left.

The Jewish role on the US Left gave it a shot in the arm, for which
all of us on the Left will be forever in debt to the Jews.

Anyway, during this 1890-1920 period, there were some important
meetings with some of the very wealthy Jews that were emerging on the
East Coast. They were concerned about the US press being in the hands
of racist Gentiles. Logically, they feared that this press would be
used to harm the Jews. In order to protect US Jews from anti-Semitism,
these wealthy Jews resolved to try to acquire as much US newspaper
media as possible.

Thus the New York Times ended up in the hands of the Ochs-Sulzbergers,
and there it has stayed ever since. A corollary of Jewish ethnic
warfare is that once a business interest is in Jewish hands, it must
remain in Jewish hands - that is, it is not to be sold to the
Gentiles. If it must be sold, it needs to be sold to other Jews,
thereby remaining "Jewish property".

Since Gentiles lack ethnic solidarity and will typically just sell to
the highest bidder, Gentile or Jewish, with time, more and more
Gentile interests will be sold to the Jews and few or no Jewish
interests will be sold to the Gentiles. This has been one of the Dirty
Little Secrets of the Jews for a long time now.

By 1920, a significant portion of the US media was in Jewish hands.
The percentage seems to have only increased since then as Jews
initiated and consolidated a hold over TV news and newsmagazines. The
mechanisms underlying Jewish domination of US broadcast news and
newsmagazines are obscure and warrant further research.

Domination of broadcast news may have been ancillary to general Jewish
domination of Hollywood, which took place from 1900-1920, via another
conspiracy of a few very wealthy Ukrainian-Polish Jews. Like the Jews
who tried to grab the newspapers, the ones who nabbed Hollywood were
motivated by fears of Gentile racism in the movie industry.

During this period, some US Gentile moviemakers were making some very
racist movies (see the reference to Birth of a Nation above) and this
deeply worried these Jews. And thus a plot was hatched to grab
Hollywood in order to safeguard the Jews.

When TV came online, Jews were a widespread force in Hollywood and
members of this group probably moved into the nascent TV industry and
dominated it also.

In 1983, an authoritative Jewish source placed the percentage of the
US media elite who were Jewish at 60%. It's probably only increased
since then. Even accounting for higher Jewish IQ, there is absolutely
no way that 2% of the population could acquire 60% of the media elite
based on IQ alone. Jewish ethnic warfare must account for quite a bit
of this domination.

Now that we have postulated, proven and explicated Jewish domination
of the US media, we can understand why US politicians live in terror
of this media.

And it is time to move on to the more mundane realities of the Jewish
Lobby, such as the work of the Jewish Lobby on the Internet. While
discussing the Jewish Lobby, it is useful, just to head off the usual
Jewish Swarm Attack, to question just what percentage of US Jews we
are talking about here.

About 30% of all US Jews are politically active in Jewish politics.
The other 70% have better things to do with their time.

Interestingly, about 20% of US Jews, mostly the liberal-Left, are
pretty much cut off from their increasingly sickening and reactionary
Organized Community. These Jews have little attachment to Israel, are
not passionate about Jewish issues, and would rather worry about their
love lives and their bills than anti-Semitism. A number of them are
actively hostile to Organized Jewish politics. Others are just
apathetic.

During Israeli wars, such as the recent Lebanon War, many of this 20%
will emerge from hibernation and start supporting Israel.

Just how many of the Zionist and pro-Jewish Internet furies are
Gentiles? Observation tells us not many are, although there are a
large number of US Gentile neoconservative bloggers who are
passionately pro-Israel.

Which brings us to the topic of the day - the role of the Jewish Lobby
on US liberal websites. I had always assumed that such sites as the
Democratic Underground and the Liberal Underground were relatively
free of the feverish slanders of the Lobby and its foot soldiers.
Turns out I was wrong.

I recently received some correspondence from a man who was quickly
banned from both DU and LU for challenging the reigning Zionist
Paradigm on these liberal sites. I will let him speak with his own
words here:

A year ago I joined the forum Liberal Underground. I don't dwell
on the Israeli/Palestinian issue because it's not something that
dominates my priorities - the Iraq war and labor are my pet issues (I
protested in DC '05) - but I saw a group of pro-Zionist campaigners
with an obvious agenda in the forum, squatting like basilisks with
tongues at the ready, really distorting the facts whenever Israel came
up, and since there was no dissenting opinions rising to the challenge
I took them on.

I was very soon labeled an anti-Semite and banned. All I did was
state the facts. This was an education for me.

About a month ago I joined the forum Democratic Underground and in
the Israeli/Palestinian forum I found the same thing going on, a sort
of propaganda campaign to put Israel in the best light and the
Palestinians in mud, so I politely and firmly contradicted the
nonsense with backed-up facts.

Here again I was called an anti-Semite and banned. I realized that
I'd been baited into violating some very strict and narrow rules
applying to that forum. A violation of these rules will get you
banned:

* No links to Whatreallyhappened or any sites on an Internet
hate site list that's 149 pages long.
* No posting that AIPAC (or other Jewish orgs) exercises undue
influence in Congress or on our foreign policy.
* No saying that the attack on the USS Liberty was deliberate.
* No calling someone a "blind supporter" of Israel, a
conservative, or an Israeli-apologist.

I posted an article by Charlie Reese, one of my favorite
columnists who's critical of Israel's policies and the Iraq war, by
way of LewRockwell.com, and the post was deleted with the warning that
LewRockwell was a bigoted site and Reese a rightwing conservative,
both unsupportable claims IMO.

Reese has some conservative views, but in many ways he's on the
left and progressive. Labels don't work with him.

The restrictions I listed are accurate and spelled-out in the
forum rules, and are also based on comments made by the forum
moderator (Lithos).

I don't see how any meaningful, useful debate can take place under
these restrictions, and what's too bad is that DU is one of the
largest and most active boards on the net. Oh well.

Then I discovered a site called Prosemiteundercover It's made up
of banned and active members of both Liberal Underground and DU, along
with Israelis, and their gig is to read, post and archive every anti-
Zionist, Israel-critical post on sites like DU, then go on an e-mail
campaign to alert and complain to the mods and demand the posts be
deleted and the poster banned.

They participate under different usernames and bait the posters
that are critical of Israel, hoping to goad them into a hot response
that'll get them banned.

This kind of covert intellectual Jihadism can definitely
contribute to mistrust and resentment of pro-Israel Jews in general.
But your take is correct IMO, the majority of Jews are reasonable and
straightforward, you just have this fanatical and mendacious minority
that suffer from cognitive dissonance and anger issues who exercise a
disproportionate influence on public discourse and effectively poison
the atmosphere.

While anti-Israel criticism on Liberal U. is non-existent in the
face of the Israel-firster squatters, on DU in the Israeli/Palestinian
forum there is critcism, but it's restricted to following a narrow and
channelized corridor.

And the inability to bring up a range of subjects, facts and
events that are inter-related to honest criticism of Israel hog-ties
open discussion. Some stridently pro-Israel posters at DU have had
their posts deleted and been banned for straying outside the strict
rules themselves, many of them landing at Prosemite Underground.

This might be merely an attempt by the mod there (Lithos) and the
Skinner to maintain the appearance of neutrality, but the fact remains
that the majority of banned posters and deleted comments are from
those critical of Israel, and the Prosemite Underground (and doubtless
other) e-mails and alerts are still read and obviously acted upon by
the mod and admin.

As you can see, the Jewish Lobby has total control over DU and LU and
God knows how many other good liberal forums. There's an active Jewish
conspiracy driving all of it, as we suspected, involving a Jewish site
- prosemiteundercover - that archives all anti-Israel posts and then
organizes campaigns to get the poster banned on spurious and phony
grounds.

A good overview of the nonsense involving PSU and DU is here, on a
decent site called the Progressive Independent. It appears that the DU
is run by a guy named Skinner, who is a Democratic Party guy with a
capital D. The US Democratic Party is bizarrely, insanely pro-Israel
(due to the Big Jewish Money described above) and this rhetorical
straitjacket in the party is mirrored on DU.

Furthermore, they conspire to try to provoke the poster in making
overtly racist remarks out of anger - the ultimate goal being to get
someone to scream KIKE or some such epithet, a tactic I observed
countless militant Usenet Jews engaging in. As soon as they provoke
the person into making the racist remark, they pummel them for being
"racist".

Then the worms archive the post for all time in their files and bring
it up endlessly to try to permanently destroy the person's reputation.

There are lots of folks around the world who have gotten pretty good
at Dirty Politics, and the Jews are surely counted among the best.
After some time in Middle East fora on Usenet, I arrived at the
conclusions that Jews were the finest propagandists in the world. I
also concluded that I had never met a more flagrantly dishonest group
of humans than these Jews.

Just a couple of observations that rumbled through my mind at the time
- not trying to make any scientific proofs here.

The conspiracy is working very well, as DU and LU are still under the
death-grip of the Jewish Lobby. The Moral Left has a duty to take back
these sites from these Jewish psychopaths, or, if not, to resign
itself to the reality that US liberalism is morally bankrupt.

Note: Readers should carefully read the Commenting Rules before
commenting to avoid having their comments edited or deleted and to
avoid being banned from the site.

see

unread,
Mar 6, 2007, 8:22:19 PM3/6/07
to
I think what this supports, is that when religion is used to hate it proves
the negatives or the worse in people.
When you add it up, jews have suffered greatly in proportion to whatever
else has suffered. They have been killed off, and victims of- prejudice for
long time. They have given the world the best scientists, teachers and
writers and most of all very non violent caring people. For israel to want
to exist, brings out all the evil people in the world who think their
religion is the only one in the world that deserves support. Or to make it
easier, it cuts to the chase to allow the most self hating people come out
faster and reflect their insecurities. Israel does not ask much from the
world but to Muslims that small little land is a threat to their existence
because they are insecure. Most normal people in the world who use religion
to hate has proved their religion is capable of harm as it is good.
"Venceremos" <ser...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:1173229822.3...@j27g2000cwj.googlegroups.com...

Venceremos

unread,
Mar 7, 2007, 8:21:49 AM3/7/07
to
On Mar 6, 8:22 pm, "see" <s...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I think what this supports, is that when religion is used to hate it proves
> the negatives or the worse in people.

T he only people who use religion to hate others are JEWS!

> When you add it up, jews have suffered greatly in proportion to whatever
> else has suffered. They have been killed off, and victims of- prejudice for
> long time.

Jews have slaughtered close to 100 million Russians during the
Bolshevik times, also!

They have given the world the best scientists, teachers and
> writers

That is not true at all. It is the world that has given the Jews the
opportunity to be what they want to be. How many Africans or natives
of Americas had the opportunity to attend the best universities and
tons of money at their disposal? Jews are no smarter than anyone
else, just that they are in the right place at the right time with
bags of money to boot!

and most of all very non violent caring people.

Tell that to 40 members of my family in Posad Pokrovskoe whom Jews
shot in the back of the head, including the babes in arms!

For israel to want
> to exist, brings out all the evil people in the world who think their
> religion is the only one in the world that deserves support. Or to make it
> easier, it cuts to the chase to allow the most self hating people come out
> faster and reflect their insecurities. Israel does not ask much from the
> world but to Muslims that small little land is a threat to their existence
> because they are insecure. Most normal people in the world who use religion
> to hate has proved their religion is capable of harm as it is

No Arab country has ever persecuted Jews for their religion. Holocaust
was the work of Christians not Arabs. Jews have lived together with
Arabs in peace for many centuries. But when the Jews want to exclude
Arabs from their own lands just because of their religion that is
unacceptable. Can you accept it if Vermont suddenly excluded all
people who are not Catholics?

Ariadne

unread,
Mar 7, 2007, 8:31:01 AM3/7/07
to
On 7 Mar, 01:10, "Venceremos" <ser...@bellsouth.net> wrote:

He's Alex Seredom of a million aliases and he's been doing it
for years and years

JBgarbuz

unread,
Mar 7, 2007, 2:43:49 PM3/7/07
to

"Venceremos" <ser...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:1173273709....@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...

> On Mar 6, 8:22 pm, "see" <s...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > I think what this supports, is that when religion is used to hate it
proves
> > the negatives or the worse in people.
>
> T he only people who use religion to hate others are JEWS!
>
> > When you add it up, jews have suffered greatly in proportion to
whatever
> > else has suffered. They have been killed off, and victims of- prejudice
for
> > long time.
>
> Jews have slaughtered close to 100 million Russians during the
> Bolshevik times, also!<

The problem with that argument is, that whereas Hitler was a German, albeit
an Austrian GErman, neither Stalin nor Lenin were Jews. But it is true that
many Jews played high roles in the Soviet government, at least until after
WWII. Then Stalin purged all Jews out of the system. In any case, nobody
could disobey Stalin, and if Stalin chose to use Jews to carry out
some of his worst policies, he certainly knew what he was doing.

> They have given the world the best scientists, teachers and
> > writers
>
> That is not true at all. It is the world that has given the Jews the
> opportunity to be what they want to be. <

That is true too. If Jews had not been dispersed, to Babylon, Rome, and the
world at large, undoubtedly they would not and could not have risen so far.
Indeed, few Israeli scientist have received Nobel Prizes compared to German
Jews in decades past, or as do American Jews today.

>How many Africans or natives
> of Americas had the opportunity to attend the best universities and
> tons of money at their disposal? Jews are no smarter than anyone
> else, just that they are in the right place at the right time with
> bags of money to boot!<

Well, the "bags of money" originally came from being peddlars who went with
their heavy bags on their back around to peddle their wares for centuries.
Nobody gave them the money. Nor did anyone give Jews "affirmative action" or
any special leg up for just being Jews.

> and most of all very non violent caring people.
>
> Tell that to 40 members of my family in Posad Pokrovskoe whom Jews
> shot in the back of the head, including the babes in arms!<

> For israel to want
> > to exist, brings out all the evil people in the world who think their
> > religion is the only one in the world that deserves support. Or to make
it
> > easier, it cuts to the chase to allow the most self hating people come
out
> > faster and reflect their insecurities. Israel does not ask much from the
> > world but to Muslims that small little land is a threat to their
existence
> > because they are insecure. Most normal people in the world who use
religion
> > to hate has proved their religion is capable of harm as it is
>
> No Arab country has ever persecuted Jews for their religion.<

Hitler did not persecute Jews for their religion. His was racial
persecution, arguing that the Jews were a parasitical race.
Arabs did not persecute JEws for their religion, but Muhammad was angered
that they refused to accept him as a prophet, and because some of them made
fun of him and his pretensions. You know what provocative comedians Jews can
be, always parodying and lampooning everyone else. So, seeing bags of money
to be taken, and using a pretext that some of them had sided with the Meccan
pagans, and broken the treaty, he was able to ethnically cleanse them, rob
them, and cut off their heads. The Jews who had founded Medina, and had
brought the date plant and the camel to Arabia, and had created oases of
plenty were no more to be found in the Hijaz, to this very day.


> Holocaust
> was the work of Christians not Arabs.<

Not totally, The yellow bit of clothing that Jews were forced to wear, began
in the Muslim world, not in Christian Europe. There were places in North
Africa where JEws had to live in Mellahs, or ghettos of sorts. As dhimmis,
Jews were expected to pay the jizya, or head tax. So it is not totally
factual to state that Muslims played no part at all in the demonization of
the Jews. They had a role, and it began in the Koran, just as antisemitism
begins in the New Testament.

> Jews have lived together with
> Arabs in peace for many centuries. But when the Jews want to exclude
> Arabs from their own lands just because of their religion that is
> unacceptable. Can you accept it if Vermont suddenly excluded all
> people who are not Catholics?<

That is a lie. Israel today is 25% non-Jewish. The percentage of non-JEws
living in Israel is greater than the percentage of blacks that live in
America, or the percentage of Latinos. Israel today is a multiethnic,
multireligious country like most western countries. More churches are built
annually in Israel than in the whole rest of the Arab world combined.

>
> good."Venceremos" <ser...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
> >
>

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Venceremos

unread,
Mar 8, 2007, 6:50:07 PM3/8/07
to
Stalin= Josip Dzugashvili (Armenian translation: SON OF A jEW)

Lenin may not have been a Jew, but his Granpeppy was a Rabbi


zr

unread,
Mar 9, 2007, 1:30:54 AM3/9/07
to
Vladimir Illych Ulyanov (Lenin)
His Grandfather was Alexander Blank
He was not a rabbi.

"Venceremos" <ser...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message

news:1173397807.3...@q40g2000cwq.googlegroups.com...

Venceremos

unread,
Mar 9, 2007, 9:01:56 AM3/9/07
to
On Mar 9, 1:30 am, "zr" <n...@cogeco.ca> wrote:
> Vladimir Illych Ulyanov (Lenin)
> His Grandfather was Alexander Blank
> He was not a rabbi.

With a name like Blank how could he possibly have been a Jew? Right?

flores...@hotmail.com

unread,
Mar 9, 2007, 9:47:40 AM3/9/07
to
On Mar 6, 8:10 pm, "Venceremos" <ser...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> Friday, March 02, 2007

<snip>


> Here again I was called an anti-Semite and banned. I realized that
> I'd been baited into violating some very strict and narrow rules
> applying to that forum. A violation of these rules will get you
> banned:
>
> * No links to Whatreallyhappened or any sites on an Internet
> hate site list that's 149 pages long.
> * No posting that AIPAC (or other Jewish orgs) exercises undue
> influence in Congress or on our foreign policy.
> * No saying that the attack on the USS Liberty was deliberate.
> * No calling someone a "blind supporter" of Israel, a
> conservative, or an Israeli-apologist.

Beautifully fascist-like rules. Right out of the fascist playbook.

<snip>


> Then I discovered a site called Prosemiteundercover It's made up
> of banned and active members of both Liberal Underground and DU, along
> with Israelis, and their gig is to read, post and archive every anti-
> Zionist, Israel-critical post on sites like DU, then go on an e-mail
> campaign to alert and complain to the mods and demand the posts be
> deleted and the poster banned.
>
> They participate under different usernames and bait the posters
> that are critical of Israel, hoping to goad them into a hot response
> that'll get them banned.

Oh yeah, smear and banning, the Ziopigs bread and butter.

> This kind of covert intellectual Jihadism can definitely
> contribute to mistrust and resentment of pro-Israel Jews in general.
> But your take is correct IMO, the majority of Jews are reasonable and
> straightforward, you just have this fanatical and mendacious minority
> that suffer from cognitive dissonance and anger issues who exercise a
> disproportionate influence on public discourse and effectively poison
> the atmosphere.

Ziopigs poison everything they touch...always have.

<snip>

> There are lots of folks around the world who have gotten pretty good
> at Dirty Politics, and the Jews are surely counted among the best.
> After some time in Middle East fora on Usenet, I arrived at the
> conclusions that Jews were the finest propagandists in the world.

They are probably the most virulent propagandists, that's for sure.
They are easy to see through however.

> also concluded that I had never met a more flagrantly dishonest group
> of humans than these Jews.
>
> Just a couple of observations that rumbled through my mind at the time
> - not trying to make any scientific proofs here.
>
> The conspiracy is working very well, as DU and LU are still under the
> death-grip of the Jewish Lobby. The Moral Left has a duty to take back
> these sites from these Jewish psychopaths,

Calling any Jew a psychopath can get you skewered, broasted and fried.
Jews do no wrong. No matter what a Jew does, it is always the
Gentile's
fault. But the question is, how long can they maintain this control?

flores...@hotmail.com

unread,
Mar 9, 2007, 9:52:46 AM3/9/07
to

Heehee right, like Arthur Blank, fairly new owner of the Atlanta
Falcons.
He has about as much business owning an NFL team as Dershowitz has
running a charm school, and their W-L record proves it....huge payroll
with top players, but lack of team unity and pis poor performances.


0 new messages