More of my philosophy about the new way of doing of our world..

[World-News2100]

Hello,


More of my philosophy about the new way of doing of our world..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

I think our world is becoming quickly a much more connected world,
and you can notice it much more clearly by also looking at the following
video:

Does POLAND want to create its own EUROPEAN UNION? The THREE SEAS
initiative - VisualPolitik EN

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qABkU1VKqgA

But i say that our world needs to be well managed, and speaking about
good management, i have also invented an important proverb about it, and
here it is (and read also carefully my below thoughts):

And here is my other important proverb:

"R&D (Research and development) and innovation bring
or introduce a kind of economic volatility, so you
have to know how to manage it and how to manage the
risk brought by it, so then you have to know how to manage
efficiently by not hurting good competition"

Note that "volatility" in the the dictionary means:

"A tendency to change quickly and unpredictably"

Read more here to notice it:

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/volatility

This above new proverb of mine also says that since the R&D (Research
and development) and innovation bring or introduce a kind of economic
volatility, so we have also to know how to manage it carefully and
efficiently with Antitrust laws, and here is the why of Antitrust laws:

"Antitrust laws are statutes developed by governments to protect
consumers from predatory business practices and ensure fair competition.
Antitrust laws are applied to a wide range of questionable business
activities, including market allocation, bid rigging, price fixing, and
monopolies."

This new proverb of mine is also related to the below problem that
brings nationalism and its economic nationalism that hurts good
competition, read about it carefully in my below writing and thoughts:

More political philosophy about what are the big economic problems of
China?..

Here is the big economic problems of China:

First economic problem is that China is addicted to debt, look at the
following video to notice it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IT7DTn9PKLw

Second economic problem is that China has Not enough PEOPLE for the
FUTURE, look at the following video to notice it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4qFVuXEe-8

Third economic problem, is that China has the same problem of
nationalism and its economic nationalism that hurts good competition
that brings efficiency, and here it is, read it carefully:

Why is GERMANY Growing More Than JAPAN? and more about China...

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms, and today
i will speak about: Why is GERMANY Growing More Than JAPAN?
and more..

We have to be more smart, i think China is also reproducing the
mistakes of Japan, because Japan has protected its large industrial
conglomerates called in Japanese "Keiretsu" and Japan has
compensated there disadvantages even if they were not efficient, and
Japan didn't hesitate to give the Keiretsu all kinds of advantages and
privileges even if they were not efficient, and this was not good for
"competition" and Japan has "failed" by doing it.

Look in this video carefully to notice it:

Why is GERMANY Growing More Than JAPAN? - VisualPolitik

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vou96yLuWXw


I think this is the same that is happening with China, since i think
China needs an efficient mechanism that protects correct "competition"
that brings good efficiency, read the following to notice it:

Competition: Europe's awakening in the face of foreign subsidies

Our state aid rules are very strict: an EU company can only receive
grants of up to € 200,000 over three years. In China, the three 5G
operators received 19 million euros each through the megalopolis of
Shenzhen (12 million inhabitants)… According to the Wall Street Journal
(article of December 25, 2019), Huawei would have benefited from 75
billion state aid via different channels, figures denied by the company.
State capitalism of China obviously raises the question of the inequity
of world competition ...

The direction the Commission is taking through the "white paper" is not
this at all. The Commission does not seek to copy the Chinese model by
favoring subsidized European champions. She does not deny her position
in the Siemens-Alstom file. Margrethe Vestager was very clear on this
point: “What we are asking for is reciprocity and conditions of
equality. […] We are not going to sacrifice the advantages of
competition to do the same thing that others do, namely to subsidize
companies. No, because we would sacrifice the idea that the market is
there to serve consumers with fairness and fair prices. "

Read more here:

https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lepoint.fr%2Fpolitique%2Femmanuel-berretta%2Fconcurrence-le-reveil-de-l-europe-face-aux-subventions-etrangeres-18-06-2020-2380631_1897.php

More of of my philosophy about what is the way of governance..

I think i am smart, and when you read my below just new proverb
you will understand much more that when you govern you have to
well balance, so you have to weigh the pros and cons or the advantages
and disadvantages so that to make the right decisions and this require
from us to be well educated and this is the way of the wise man, but i
think that the way is that you also have to govern by not being
"extremism" that hurts Democracy, for example i think that populism that
has elected Donald Trump as president was not the right Elitism, so i
think the kind of populism that has elected Donald Trump is an extremism
since it was lacking the right Elitism and since also it was only a kind
of reactionary movement that doesn't know correctly how to manage our
world, since they were just reacting violently to this or that problem
by becoming too much violent, but they were not knowing how to manage
our world, so this kind of populism is not what we call wisdom, so i
think that the best way of governance is the governance that knows how
to manage our world.

Here is my just new smart proverb:

"In Ancient Chinese philosophy we have the yin and yang that is a
concept of dualism, but i think that our world is composed of things,
and those things when they interact with humans they come with both
disadvantages and advantages, and it is like the knife, a knife can be
good and it can be bad, so take for example the things that we call
space and matter of our universe, so if you have too much space or
matter it is a disadvantage, or take for example the thing that we call
"time", so time also has its disadvantages such as if you go faster than
speed of light, this violates causality, this is why the most important
thing is not to let it as it is, but you have to know how to well
balance by being wisdom that knows how to manage our world, so you have
not for example to be like stupid people and think that sex is King or
money is King, this is why we have to not be philosophical immaturity
and we have to be responsability by being wisdom that knows how to
manage our world."

Here is my just new other smart proverb:

"When you want to fly like a bird, you can fly like a bird and look from
high above from the sky at our world as a "beautiful" world without
looking at its imperfections and then you can be more happy, or you can
look at our world from the inside and think about it from inside by
looking at its imperfections and be much less happy or sad, so how do
you solve this problem ? so when you are smart you will notice that we
can solve the problem by also powerfully energizing the spirit using the
positive spirit so that to transcend much better the imperfections of
our world, and in my new philosophy i will speak about how to
efficiently and powerfully energize the spirit using the positive spirit"

And here is my other new proverb:

"Human smartness is finding a small number of tools that permit to
solve a great number of problems, so when you look carefully at what is
human smartness you will notice that it is not about great quantity, it
is about a small quantity of good quality that permits us to be so
powerful. Being smart is not about quantity, it is much more about quality."

So i think i am smart and i will explain my new proverb above:

With pattern recognition of fluid intelligence we are finding
patterns that are the tools, and we are understanding and applying those
patterns that we are finding with fluid intelligence to
other many other new problems, so then we are not finding the patterns
again and again, so then we are not finding the tools that are those
patterns again and again, so pattern recognition of fluid intelligence
is a minimization process that permits to find a small number of tools
that permit to solve great number of problems. I think i am smart, and I
have to be more precise, so you have to understand that the minimization
process above is on the "finding", so when i say in my proverb above:
"Human smartness is finding a small number of tools that permit to solve
a great number of problems", the "finding a small number" is my good
abstract thinking and it means that it is a minimization process on the
"finding", since we are not "finding" the tools that are the patterns
again and again.

More of my philosophy about my other just new proverb..

I think i am smart and i will explain my following just new proverb:

"You don't learn a valuable lesson from making mistakes, but you learn a
valuable lesson from being the right prevention and making the mistakes"

So if you say that you learn a valuable lesson from making mistakes, it
is the general way of saying, so it includes the mistakes that have not
be prevented by the right prevention, so then this way of learning must
logically not be allowed, so then it becomes not a valuable lesson as in
my new proverb, so i think that the general way of saying it is the way
of my new proverb.

So as i am saying below:

I will say that since you have two types of learning, and here they are:

1- Learning by being the right prevention

2- Learning by not being the right prevention

So the second way of learning by using the right prevention is the right
way.

Here is my just new proverb:

"You don't learn a valuable lesson from making mistakes, but you learn a
valuable lesson from being the right prevention and making the mistakes"

So I invite you to look at the following known black american that
says the following:

"FAILURE Means You've LEARNED Another VALUABLE LESSON!"

Here he is in the following video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AHpDeonEwO4

So i think i am smart, and from my just new above proverb you are
understanding that the above general saying of the known black american
is not smart, since the "failure" comes also from the mistakes. And
now by reading my just new above proverb you are understanding my
logical proof below, so read all my previous thoughts below:

More of my philosophy about white supremacism and neo-nazism..

I think i am smart and i think that the problem of today Western
countries is that they are not being the right Elitism, since i think
that populism is not the right Elitism that we require, so i will give
you an example so that you understand, so look at the following new
article of a journalist of a white supremacist website in USA called
national vanguard:

https://nationalvanguard.org/2021/09/how-to-tell-true-philosophy-from-false-philosophy-in-30-seconds/

So i think that this article is not smart since look carefully
at how he is ranking Survival,Truth and Justice, Freedom, etc.
and notice carefully that he is saying that Survival comes before Truth,
and i think that it is not smart to say so, since i think i am smart and
i say that Survival is like my smart redefinition of Utilitarianism,
since you have to survive in the present and you have to survive in the
near future or in the future, so since you have to survive this way so
you have to survive as a group to be better survival and then
responsability is inherent to it since you have also to be more
organized as a group so that to survive in the near future or future, so
then since this responsability is inherent so we can logically say that
you have to be more organized by using more sophisticated knowledge or
smartness, so then this more sophisticated knowledge comes with truth
that permits you to be better organized so that to survive, so then this
proves that we can not simply Rank Survival before the truth, so then my
logical proof is finished and it shows that the above article is not
right by Ranking as he is ranking.

More of my philosophy of what is exactly smartness..

So what is exactly smartness ?

So i will think "rapidly" the answer of this question as follows:

If you look below at how i am discovering rapidly the pattern with my
fluid intelligence in my logical proof, i think this shows more what is
smartness of the fluid intelligence, i think that being smart is also
the fluid intelligence that discovers patterns, and i think that a
pattern that you discover with your fluid intelligence is like a static
or dynamic "system" that you discover, and this pattern recognition in
human fluid intelligence is to recognize a particular way in which
something is done, is organized, or happens and this pattern that you
discover can be low level or high level, for example look at my below
logical proof and how i am discovering the pattern with my fluid
intelligence and since the pattern that i have just discovered gives a
high level knowledge that is the pattern in itself, so i think it is a
high level pattern, so there is also low level patterns that are a low
level knowledge, and the high level knowledge is like Macroeconomics and
the low level knowledge is like Microeconomics and when you discover the
sophisticated patterns with your fluid intelligence , those
sophisticated patterns are the tools that make you more smart or much
more smart.

And read carefully my following thoughts of my philosophy about what is
smartness:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Wzf6AOl41xs


More of my philosophy about being logically consistent..

I invite you to look at the following known black american that
says the following:

"FAILURE Means You've LEARNED Another VALUABLE LESSON!"

Here he is in the following video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AHpDeonEwO4

And we had, before the above saying, the same saying in Morocco as
following:

"Koul 3atra fiha khir"

But i think that the above black american is not smart and that those
above sayings are not smart and are not logically consistent, and i
think i am smart and i am rapidly seeing a pattern with my fluid
intelligence and here it is:

I will say that since you have two types of learning, and here they are:

1- Learning by being the right prevention

2- Learning by not being the right prevention

So i think the above sayings are not logically consistent,
since if in the second type of learning above you have made a mistake
that you have not to make if you are the right prevention, you can not
"simply" say as a conclusion by being "positive" that it is a "valuable"
lesson, since logically this positive way of saying is not logically
allowed since the conclusion must be that making the mistake is a
stupidity that you had not to make and that it is not a "valuable"
lesson , so then i say that the above sayings are logically inconsistent.

And if you want logically consistent proverbs, here is my new proverbs
that are logically consistent and that are interesting:

So you can read all my proverbs that i have just invented quickly here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ZyUvFt_nix8


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

[World-News2100]