Dr. Jai Maharaj wrote:
> The discussion ends:
<<<snip>>>
CNN & White House
December 7, 1998
CNN Transcript
http://www.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/9812/07/se.01.html
QUESTION: Joe, in view of last week's American Social Health
Association report, there were 5 million new cases of Human
Papilloma Virus, three million new cases of Chlamydia, 650,000 new
cases of gonorrhea and 1 million new cases of Herpes. Has the
Secret Service...
LOCKHART: Wolf, are you sure you guys want to take this live
anymore?
WOLF BLITZER, CNN SR. WHITE HOUSE CORRESPONDENT: We're not taking
this live.
LOCKHART: OK, good.
(LAUGHTER)
QUESTION: Has the Secret Service, in their obligation to protect
the president...
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Careful.
QUESTION: ... asked that Monica Lewinsky be tested?
LOCKHART: Next.
WATERS: All right, Joe Lockhart suggested we may not want to take
this live anymore, so we'll go over a bit of what he fleshed out
for reporters on the president's defense by lawyers tomorrow and
Wednesday before the House Judiciary Committee.
- - - - -
Excerpt from Today's White House Briefing - Asking about STDs and
Clinton!
White House Home Page Q In view of last week's American Social
Health Association report of 5 million new cases of human papilloma
virus*, 3 million new cases of chlamydia*, 650,000 new cases of
gonorrhea* and 1 million new cases of herpes, has the Secret
Service --
MR. LOCKHART: Wolf, are you sure you want to take this life
anymore? Okay, good.
Q Has the Secret Service in their obligation to protect the
President asked that Monica Lewinsky be tested?
Q Ohhhh.
MR. LOCKHART: Next.
Q Doesn't the Secret Service have an obligation to protect the
President? Don't they, Joe? Would you like to ignore this, it's
embarrassing? Okay.
- - - - -
Thanks to Lance for pointing this out on another .
Notice the interesting typo on the White House
version of the event!
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a366c4bbd30fc.htm
Posted by: Jolly 12/07/98 15:45:57 PST
- - - - -
Source of the above and more news and discussion:
http://www.freerepublic.com/
Click on the "Latest on Clinton" link at
http://www.flex.com/~jai
> To: Jolly
And all this from CNN - perhaps I should change my acro for CNN
from the Concocted News Network to the Contractible-Disease News
Network.
> To: Jolly
It was just too obvious. Joe just hasn't gotten the hand signals
Mike showed him down pat yet. Damn rookies.
> From: Lance (lwmc...@erols.com) 12/07/98 15:53:55 PST
- - - - -
> To: Jolly
Doh! clean up my long link
> From: Jolly 12/07/98 15:53:58 PST
- - - - -
> To: Jolly
Isn't that nice; the White House gets to tell CNN what to
broadcast. Just like Lewinsky quoted Clinton in the Starr
transcripts, "CNN will do whatever I tell them to."
> From: Dana113 (dan...@gtii.com) 12/07/98 15:56:02 PST
- - - - -
> To: Lance
Yeah, he really try to be more subtle! Notice there were a few
other comments that were left out of the White House version of
events. Isn't it great when they provide the rope to hang
themselves with!
> From: Jolly 12/07/98 15:58:07 PST
- - - - -
> To: Jolly
Gee, I wonder why CNN pulled this. CNN NEVER displays ethical
behavior anyhow when it comes to respect for Republicans.
> From: pricie 12/07/98 15:58:31 PST
- - - - -
> To: Dana113
What a staged press briefing. Now we have confirmation that they
all are.
> From: Patriot (one...@hotmail.com) 12/07/98 15:59:42 PST
- - - - -
> To: Jolly
I'll bet the transcripts are synched up by eod tomorrow.
> From: triple 12/07/98 16:00:48 PST
- - - - -
> To: Jolly
Any idea who the reporter was ? If you look deeper in the WH
transcript, you see where Joe says something like
'Sorry, Randy, I can't take your question seriously right now'
or something of the such.
Who Randy is, I don't know. The WH will probably pretend he was
from the Howard Stern Show.
> From: Lurker_One (fernl...@hotmail.com) 12/07/98 16:01:27 PST
- - - - -
Source of the above and more news and discussion:
http://www.freerepublic.com/
Click on the "Latest on Clinton" link at
http://www.flex.com/~jai
Jai Maharaj
Jyotishi, Vedic Astrologer
Billionaire financier J. P. Morgan used
a scientific astrologer and so can you!
http://www.flex.com/~jai
Om Shanti
Please help stop death threats, hate crimes and terrorism:
NEW YORK CHRISTIAN THREATENS TO KILL ASTROLOGERS
Criminal Prem Thomas <pre...@ged.net> of 8 Lakeland Avenue,
Congers, NY 10920-1708 USA, tel 914-268-8634, fax 914-268-5361,
has published threats to mass-murder astrologers:
http://www.flex.com/~jai/articles/PremThomasThreat.html
Here are three news items about other criminals like him:
News item 1
"ONLINE HATE DRAWS SENTENCE . . .
"A 21-year-old college dropout who became the first
person convicted of a federal hate crime committed in
cyberspace received a one-year jail sentence . . .
"U.S. District Judge Alicemarie Stotler Monday sentenced
Richard Machado to one year in prison and ordered him to
undergo counseling.
[...]
"Prosecutors said he sent e-mail messages to 59 Asian
students at UCI, threatening to 'find and kill every one of
you personally' and signing the missives 'Asian Hater.' . . ."
[...] End of Excerpts
- Reuters, Los Angeles, CA, USA, May 5, 1998.
News item 2
"EMAIL DEATH THREAT SPREADS
"A death threat spam that frightened America Online
members last week now has spread to Yahoo Mail.
"The email message, which comes from an America Online
return address, reads as follows:
"'Hello, my name is Andy. I know where you live and I
know where your kids sleep. If you dont [sic] call me within
24 hours im [sic] going to kill your kids.' It lists a phone
number and adds: 'P.S. This is NOT a joke.'
[...]
"'We're working closely with the FBI,' Ryan said. 'This
is a criminal investigation, and we're cooperating fully
with the FBI.'
[...]
"AOL spokesperson Tricia Primrose said AOL has 'no idea'
how many of its members received the threat.
[...]
"Threats made via the Net are not a new phenomenon. Earlier
this year, a 21-year-old Los Angeles man was convicted for
sending racist death threats via email to 59 Asian students at
the University of California at Irvine. The case set a precedent
in that it put online communications on par legally with
telephone calls and postal mail. It also was significant because
it addressed civil rights violations perpetrated online.
[...]
"Online hate speech also has been a subject that has plagued
online services, families, and free speech advocates alike.
- CNET News, July 6, 1998, available at:
http://www.news.com/News/Item/0,4,23868,00.html
News item 3
"MAN CHARGED WITH CLINTON THREAT
"Eugene, Oregon (AP) - A man accused of threatening to kill
President Clinton during a visit here last June has been indicted
by a federal grand jury.
"Jeffery Loring Pickering, 49, is being held without bail in the
Lane County Jail is scheduled to be arraigned Monday in U.S.
District Court. If convicted, he could be sentenced to a maximum of
35 years in prison.
"Pickering, who was indicted Friday, was arrested by the FBI
last week in connection with telephone threats made in the days
prior to Clinton's arrival on June 13.
"The president came to Springfield to meet with victims, other
students and families recovering from the shootings at Thurston
High School which left two people dead and 22 wounded.
"In three calls to the FBI and Eugene police, a man said Clinton
would be shot during his visit and that bombs had been placed at
various locations in Eugene and Springfield.
"As the caller had accurately described, police found two bombs
in a culvert near the Oregon Air & Space Museum.
"The bombs were constructed of plastic pipe filled with
explosive material and were equipped with grenade primers. The pipe
sections were about 15 inches long and 1 inch in diameter. No other
bombs were found.
"Clinton's visit took place without incident. Ten days later,
police played a tape of one of the telephone threats at a news
conference and asked the public's help in identifying the caller.
"Court records show that two of Pickering's brothers contacted
the FBI and said he was the caller. His sisters and his mother
later identified his voice as well.
"The indictment charges Pickering with threatening to kill
Clinton, using an explosive in making the threat, making threats
that bombs were placed elsewhere, and with two counts of making
false statements to FBI agents.
"Days before the president's visit, Pickering told friends and
relatives that if Clinton visited the area he would 'blow him
away,' court documents show.
- Asociated Press, Eugene, Oregon, October 24, 1998.
Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for law
enforcement, and the educational purposes of research and open
discussion.
Here is the full transcript from the White House:
Whitehouse Spin Machine: Lockhart's Press Briefing today 12/7/98
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a366c4e603872.htm
> From: Jolly 12/07/98 16:03:21 PST
- - - - -
> To: Jolly
QUESTION? Was CNN just showing clips from the live press
meeting.....OR had they shown the entire briefing up to this CUT ?
(I was watching c-span)....
WE SHOULD EMAIL THIS THREAD TO RUSH FOR TOMORROW'S SHOW !
> From: CharlotteVRWC (K...@DittosRush.com) 12/07/98 16:03:42 PST
- - - - -
> To: pricie
Now we can confirm that CNN is nothing but the Clinton's and the
Democrats soviet style Pravda. Disgusting! I wish I had the CHOICE,
Jane Fonda, to abort CNN from my cable system!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> From: enash 12/07/98 16:04:23 PST
- - - - -
> To: Lurker_One
I was watching it on CSPAN and all I could hear was a male voice I
could not place. The camera never left Lockhart.
Any WH Press Pool Lurkers want to enlighten us?
> From: Jolly 12/07/98 16:06:03 PST
- - - - -
> To: Jolly
Ministry of Propaganda strikes again.
Secratary of Commerce - controls commerce in country Secretary of
Transportation - controls the transportation system Secretary of
Energy - controls energy supply and distribution Press
Secretary...that means you run and control the press, right?
Things are coming right into line now...makes so much more sense
now that things come out in the open, doesn't it.
All that is missing are the evil names like Pravda or Tass or
Communist, etc...
Wolves in sheeps clothing.
> From: Lance (lwmc...@erols.com) 12/07/98 16:09:53 PST
- - - - -
> To: CharlotteVRWC
Great topic for Rush. How the media covers for Clinton.
> To: Patriot
I just emailed the thread to Rush,,,,maybe some others can
send it as well so he will be sure to see it....
> From: CharlotteVRWC (K...@DittosRush.com) 12/07/98 16:13:43 PST
- - - - -
> To: CharlotteVRWC
THEY WERE CARRING IT LIVE!!! Not a clipped version of the events. I
know this because I first began watching it on CNN and then flipped
over to CSPAN. Also if you go to the link at the top you can see
CNN's whole transcript of the segment.
> From: Jolly 12/07/98 16:19:47 PST
- - - - -
> To: CharlotteVRWC
This is definately a story for Rush and Drudge... I just emailed
both of them about it.
> From: Jolly 12/07/98 16:20:25 PST
- - - - -
> To: Patriot
WOW ! DRUDGE PICKED UP THE HEADLINE -
CNN PULLS WHITE HOUSE BRIEFING AFTER SEX DISEASE QUESTIONS (Drudge
Report).
> From: CharlotteVRWC (K...@DittosRush.com) 12/07/98 16:22:03 PST
- - - - -
> To: CharlotteVRWC
Also it is being snet on to the Acuarcy In Media people. Joe is
just making this all to easy. He needs to go back and take a few
more lessons!
> From: Jolly 12/07/98 16:22:31 PST
- - - - -
> To: Jolly
Wow! They were carrying it live and had to CUT it !
> From: CharlotteVRWC (K...@DittosRush.com) 12/07/98 16:25:03 PST
- - - - -
> To: Dana113
. . . the White House gets to tell CNN what to broadcast.
It's like having your own state-controlled news agency. Sort of,
like, Tass.
> From: dez (needcourage@DC) 12/07/98 16:25:40 PST
- - - - -
> To: CharlotteVRWC
He got it!!! I can't get the article though....
> From: Jolly 12/07/98 16:27:10 PST
- - - - -
> To: dez
It's not "like" it "is" State controlled. Wake up America!
> From: Patriot (one...@hotmail.com) 12/07/98 16:28:27 PST
- - - - -
<b><font size=5><marquee>IMPEACH CLINTON! DO IT NOW!</marquee></font></b><br>
Matt Drudge reported that CNN cancelled a Larry King interview with
him at the insistance of Bill Clinton's White House. Seems Wolf
Blitzer would not get his questioned answered by the president if
Drudge appeared on CNN. Seems Clinton violated the Constitution yet
again: Stomped all over the "Free Press" amendment.
I no longer watch CNN. Its now Criminal News Network to me.
> - - - - -
>
>Excerpt from Today's White House Briefing - Asking about STDs and
>Clinton!
>
>White House Home Page Q In view of last week's American Social
>Health Association report of 5 million new cases of human papilloma
>virus*, 3 million new cases of chlamydia*, 650,000 new cases of
>gonorrhea* and 1 million new cases of herpes, has the Secret
>Service --
>
>MR. LOCKHART: Wolf, are you sure you want to take this life
>anymore? Okay, good.
>
>Q Has the Secret Service in their obligation to protect the
>President asked that Monica Lewinsky be tested?
>
>Q Ohhhh.
>
>MR. LOCKHART: Next.
>
>Q Doesn't the Secret Service have an obligation to protect the
>President? Don't they, Joe? Would you like to ignore this, it's
>embarrassing? Okay.
>
> - - - - -
>
>Thanks to Lance for pointing this out on another .
>
>Notice the interesting typo on the White House
>version of the event!
>http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a366c4bbd30fc.htm
>
>Posted by: Jolly 12/07/98 15:45:57 PST
>
> - - - - -
>
Mr. H
Dr. Jai Maharaj wrote:
>
> There is a campaign afoot to boycott the
> goods and services sold by companies which
> advertise on CNN. I think that it is a good
> idea to support it as much as possible.
>
> Click on the "Latest on Clinton" link at
> http://www.flex.com/~jai
>
> In article <367703f2...@news.pipeline.com> ,
Click on the "Latest on Clinton" link at
http://www.flex.com/~jai
In article <366EF0...@nospam.org> ,
"Mr. Horrible" <m...@nospam.org> wrote:
>
> So when Clinton (allegedly) threatens to boycott CNN,
> it's censorship, but when you do it, it's a good idea?
>
> Mr. H
>
> Dr. Jai Maharaj wrote:
> >
I hate tell you this but Presidents have been doing this
will news organizations before CNN or Clinton were born.
As for Mr. Druge not being on CNN, well perhaps somebody woke
up the fact he is often a liar, or at least doesn't know the
truth. I would ban CNN if they had Druge on, not having him on
only puts them up a notch.
As for CNN being the Clinton News Network. The report the facts.
The facts speak on behalf on Clinton. Sorry that you wish other wise.
tim
People have been committing murder for a very long
time, too, but that does not make it right. (So much
for that type of liberal-leftist logic, eh?)
> As for Mr. Druge not being on CNN, well perhaps somebody woke
> up the fact he is often a liar, . . .
Is there any evidence of that? He is hated by the
leftist-liberals because he broke the Clinton-Lewinsky
story on the Internet, and continues to expose others.
> . . . or at least doesn't know the
> truth. I would ban CNN if they had Druge on, not
> having him on only puts them up a notch.
People are free to exercise their choice of believing
the misinformation often spread by Clinton's News Network.
> As for CNN being the Clinton News Network. The report the facts.
> The facts speak on behalf on Clinton. Sorry that you wish other
> wise. tim
CNN has admitted in the past that what they aired was not true.
Remember the nerve-gas story earlier this year? There are more
examples, do the research instead of blindly believing whatever
they or any network broadcasts.
Click on the "Latest on Clinton" link at
http://www.flex.com/~jai
In article <74ov0c$acu$1...@remarQ.com> ,
"The Survivalist" <surv...@inetone.net> posted:
I guess you were a supporter of the Vietnam War where we killed 1.5
million Vietnamese senselessly..HUH.. I was in that war and support Jane
Fondas actions.
You forget Ho Chi was an ally of the USA and because of big business
interests over political differences forced Vietnam to the Communists.
Just like the moderate Republicans are being forced by the Extreme Right
Wing.
Any reasonable person in this world knows Mr. Clinton is doing the right
thing regarding Iraq.
You too have had your last warning
Df
: Any reasonable person in this world knows Mr. Clinton is doing the right
: thing regarding Iraq.
Why just one day before the impeachment hearings?
: Df
BEcause the UN inspectors were still in Iraq until a couple of days ago.
Because it took a couple of days to get their report and build a concensus
for attack. Because prompt action was needed. Because the Muslim holy month
of Ramadan is near, and Arab support for bombings would dwindle if they were
carried out during a holy time. Same deal for Christmas - no one would
support bombings over Christmas. Because the longer you wait to act act the
weaker your moral justification. Because the impeachment hearings are
scheduled to start ( even though a vote hasn;t been taken yet!!) in mid
January, and if you are whining now then imagine the whines then!!
Larry
I am not whining and your list is not convincing.
The attacks didn't stop and are continuing still after Ramadan started
and there is not end in sight, apparently. I guess Christmas is more
important than Ramadan! ;-) Take it easy!
(I am not a followerof either faiths or any faith for that matter! ;-); FYI).
Regards, --Ramakrishna.
Larry Hewitt (hew...@charm.net) wrote:
: ramk...@imap3.asu.edu wrote in message <75bol4$c7q$2...@news.asu.edu>...
: ramk...@imap3.asu.edu wrote in message <75bol4$c7q$2...@news.asu.edu>...
: >Dan Fahey (danf...@dansources.com) wrote:
: >
: >: Any reasonable person in this world knows Mr. Clinton is doing the right
: >: thing regarding Iraq.
: >
: >Why just one day before the impeachment hearings?
: >
: BEcause the UN inspectors were still in Iraq until a couple of days ago.
: Because it took a couple of days to get their report and build a concensus
: for attack. Because prompt action was needed. Because the Muslim holy month
: of Ramadan is near, and Arab support for bombings would dwindle if they were
: carried out during a holy time. Same deal for Christmas - no one would
: support bombings over Christmas. Because the longer you wait to act act the
: weaker your moral justification. Because the impeachment hearings are
: scheduled to start ( even though a vote hasn;t been taken yet!!) in mid
: January, and if you are whining now then imagine the whines then!!
You're right prompt action was needed. Bill Clinton was 24hrs away from being impeached.
He simply did what he's been doing for the last six years. I'm sure you liberals believe
it was vital to bomb the asprin factory when and how he did in august. Then there was the
bombing Iraq within a week of the '96 election. I know the timing of that had nothing to
do with the election.
--
Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
-------------------
f...@deepthought.com