HEADLEY TESTIMONY DETAILS ISI HANDLING OF LeT ON 26/11

1 view
Skip to first unread message

and/or www.mantra.com/jai

unread,
May 24, 2011, 12:37:31 PM5/24/11
to
Headley testimony details ISI handling of LeT on 26/11

AP
The Pioneer
Tuesday, May 24, 2011

Chicago - A key co-plotter of the Mumbai attacks, David Coleman
Headley testified in the trial of Chicago businessman Tahawwur Rana
describing how he gave frequent updates about his progress to his two
Pakistani handlers -- one from a militant group and the other from
the country's main intelligence agency.

The federal terrorism trial of businessman Tahawwur Rana is being
closely watched around the world for what the attack's scout --
Rana's longtime friend David Coleman Headley -- might reveal about
possible links between the anti-India militant group, Lashkar-e-
Taiba, and Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence agency, known as
the ISI.

Headley already has pleaded guilty to laying the groundwork for the
Mumbai attacks, and he agreed to testify against Rana to avoid the
death penalty, making him one of the most valuable U.S. government
counterterrorism witnesses.

What Headley says during the trial has the potential to inflame
tensions between Pakistan and India and place more pressure on the
already frayed U.S. and Pakistani relations. His testimony also could
add to the questions about Pakistan's commitment to catch terrorists
and the ISI's connections to Pakistan-based terror groups, especially
after Osama bin Laden was killed by U.S. forces in a military
garrison town outside Islamabad earlier this month.

The Pakistani government has denied that the ISI orchestrated three-
day siege in Mumbai that left more than 160 people dead, including
six Americans. Pakistani intelligence officials have not commented on
the trial.

"Headley's testimony is a nail in the coffin of U.S.-Pakistani
strategic cooperation," said Bruce Riedel, a former White House
adviser on Middle Eastern and South Asian issues. "Until now his
commentary has gotten very little attention outside India, now it
will finally get the attention it deserves here."

After opening statements Monday, the government called Headley, a
Pakistani-American, to the witness stand where he spent hours
detailing the formulation of the attacks and Rana's alleged help in
providing cover for his surveillance activities in India.

Headley, clean-shaven and balding, wore a light blue golf shirt with
a dark windbreaker during testimony at the federal courthouse in
Chicago. Speaking so softly at times that attorneys had to remind him
to speak louder, Headley said he has been involved with Lashkar-e-
Taiba for more than a decade, but he wasn't working with someone in
the ISI until years later after he was arrested by tribal police near
Afghanistan. It was then he said he met a major in the ISI and told
him what he and Lashkar were planning.

This ISI major, Headley said, was "very pleased" with what he heard
and asked if Headley would work with one of his ISI associates.
Headley agreed and said he was released from custody. Headley soon
received a call from a man he referred to during his testimony as
"Major Iqbal," which the U.S. government says is an alias. Headley
said he then met Iqbal in a safe house in Lahore, Pakistan and
described his plans with Lashkar and his assignment to take videos of
Mumbai in preparation of an operation.

Headley said ISI provided financial and military assistance to
Lashkar, and he assumed they worked under the same umbrella. He said
Iqbal and his Lashkar handler,Sajid Mir, were in communication, but
he would meet with them separately in Pakistan. Headley said when he
would take videos of sights in Mumbai, he would first share them with
Iqbal and then with Mir.

"They coordinated with each other and ISI provided assistance to
Lashkar," Headley told jurors.

Before moving to Mumbai in late 2006, Headley said he first came to
Chicago, met with Rana and explained the plot in hopes of persuading
Rana to let him open a branch of his immigration services business as
a cover.

"I knew my friend had an office and I could persuade him to help us
out," Headley told jurors.

With Rana's help, Headley said he set up an immigration consulting
business in Mumbai and secured work visas to travel in and out of
India. Headley described conversations he had with Rana while he was
visiting in Chicago, and the prosecution showed emails between the
two men discussing the immigration business and Mumbai operation
through coded words.

Headley said he first told Rana about his involvement with Lashkar in
In August 2005. Headley said his friend was surprised to learn this,
but did not say he disapproved.

Earlier Monday, attorneys painted opposing portraits of Rana, a
Pakistani-born Canadian who has lived in Chicago for years.

"The defendant knew all too well that when Headley travels to a
foreign country, people may die," Assistant U.S. Attorney Sarah
Streicker told jurors.

But defense attorney Charles Swift described Headley as a man who had
been manipulating people for years, including Rana, a Pakistani-born
Canadian who has lived in Chicago for years. Swift said Headley has a
history of cooperating with the government in order to get out of
trouble and spoke of Headley's work with the Drug Enforcement
Administration in the 1990s. At one point, Swift said, Headley was
working for the DEA, Lashkar and Pakistani intelligence at the same
time.

Rana, 50, has pleaded not guilty in the case. His name is the seventh
one on the federal indictment, and the only defendant in custody.
Among the six others charged in absentia is Mir and Iqbal.

Headley's testimony is expected to resume Tuesday morning.

http://dailypioneer.com/340843/Headley-testimony-details-ISI-handling-of-LeT-on-26/11.html

More at:
http://www.dailypioneer.com

Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
Om Shanti

o Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the educational
purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of this post may not
have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the
poster. The contents are protected by copyright law and the exemption for
fair use of copyrighted works.
o If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read,
considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name, current
e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number.
o Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others are
not necessarily those of the poster who may or may not have read the article.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted material the use of
which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. This material is being made available in efforts to advance the
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democratic, scientific, social, and cultural, etc., issues. It is believed
that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research, comment, discussion and educational purposes by
subscribing to USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more information
go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article for purposes of
your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
copyright owner.

Since newsgroup posts are being removed
by forgery by one or more net terrorists,
this post may be reposted several times.

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages