Read again, i correct a last typo..

[Sky89]

Hello,


Read again, i correct a last typo..

Read all the following to understand more:

The essence of nationalism and socialism..

Here is the most important idea that has given rise to nationalism and
socialism..

When you are more "insecure" and you are more "weak",
you need to be security and this gives rise to nationalism that wants
to bring security by being too nationalistic that is inefficient or/and
you need also to be "compassion" towards your
people that are more weak and more insecure, so this gives rise to
socialism that is more "idealistic" and that is not pragmatism
of efficiency and optimization like in UK.

Also i said the following:

About pragmatism..

This is a very interesting subject, one of the fondation ideas
of philosophy is that there is rationalism and there is empiricism,
rationalism is like the "theory", and alone it can give problems,
this is why pragmatism also dictates that we have also to know how to be
both rationalism and empiricism to be a better or be a better system,
this bring a very interesting "analogy", look at socialism of
Algeria, i think socialism of Algeria is not pragmatic, but
it is like the deficiency of being only rationalism !
because socialism is more based on idealism ! it is
based more on the "theory" that is more idealistic, and this
is not pragmatic, because being pragmatic is being "efficiency"
and being efficiency is being efficiency of both rationalism
and empiricism ! this is also the defect of the "Syrian" regime,
the actual Russia has almost the same defect because it is archaism of
"nationalism" that is inefficient and that is less pragmatic than the
UK governance that is pragmatic and more Elitist and that follows the
way of efficiency and optimization. Here is what i have posted about
Russia that is an inefficient country:


About Russia's economy...

Read this:

Why Switzerland was ranked the most economically free nation in Europe ?

The important characteristics of Switzerland are:

1. Rule of law

2. Optimization of the Government size

3. Regulatory efficiency

4. Open markets


Read more here:

https://lenews.ch/2016/02/03/why-switzerland-was-ranked-the-most-economically-free-nation-in-europe/

So now about "Russia", Russia lacks many of the requirements for strong
economy, read the following to notice it:


"Russia’s transition from a centrally planned economy to a more
market-based system has stalled, and the country remains predominantly
statist. Further economic reforms have been subordinated to the
imperatives of political stability and government longevity. The private
sector has been marginalized by structural and institutional constraints
caused by ever-growing government encroachment into the marketplace.
Large state-owned institutions and an inefficient public sector dominate
the economy. The judiciary is vulnerable to corruption, and weak
protection of property rights undermines prospects for optimal long-term
economic development."

https://www.heritage.org/index/country/russia


Also i said the following:

About nationalism and socialism..

I will do again political philosophy so that you will be
able to understand our world better..

I think socialism and nationalism that is more archaic today are ideas
of the past, the context of the past that was more "insecure" and more
"weakness" has given rise to socialism and to nationalism that is more
archaic today , and now you are able to understand deeply politics, the
problem also of the Syrian regime and of the Algerian regime and Russian
regime and the like is like the problem of the "past" ! since they are
third world countries and countries that are "weak" and more "insecure",
this weakness and insecurity is the same "context" of the past that has
given rise to socialism and to nationalism that is archaism today, this
insecurity and weakness of those countries give rise again to socialism
and/or nationalism that is archaic inside there
system, this is why those countries that are more weak and more
insecure are still blocked into those kind of inefficient socialist and
nationalistic regimes , so the way out of those regimes is to enhance
there "economies", so they must adhere to the way of optimization and
efficiency of there economy and there system like in UK to be able to
transcend there living conditions !



Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

[Sky89]

Hello..


Read again, i correct a last typo, read again all my following thoughts,
i will soon add more and more of my thoughts..

I have just read about Buddhism here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhism


The strong points of Buddhism are:

--
"Observance of moral precepts, renunciation of craving and attachment,
the practice of meditation (including calm and insight), the cultivation
of wisdom, loving-kindness and compassion"
--

But i think i am a more "sophisticated" philosophy, because my
philosophy comes from the fact that we humans are like a "raft" that is
exposed to the inclemency and to dangers and to risks of life, so we
have to guide correctly the "raft" to avoid those problems of life, so
the "requirements" must be set and "prioritized" to be able to succeed,
so the requirements can not include renunciation of craving and
attachment of Buddhism because it is "not" realistic, because it is like
the defect of idealism of socialism , you have to transcend it with a
"much" more "capable" ideology, like i am doing it here with my
political philosophy.

Here is my some of my thoughts of my political philosophy, read them
all to notice it and to understand me better:

More about political philosophy..

I will do again political philosophy..

I will start it by an important question that is:

What is the essence or the backbone of our civilization ?

What distinguish our civilization ?

I think we have to think more to understand better..

If we answer it by saying that civilization bring quality.

This is "too" much abstraction , because at this abstraction you are not
understanding more and you are not "aware" more..

In political philosophy you have not to choose the easy way of
answering, you have to think more complex to be able to understand better..

Here is my answer:

Look at nazism, nazism is extremism of perfection that bring
violence into the system, so we have to know how to balance
the requirements today to not get into this violence of nazism, this is
also civilization !

And look at economy , before in the past we were too poorer and we were
less organized and we were too weak, this is why we have practiced
"domination" and we have practiced more violence(like slavery etc.) to
be able to "survive" and to be better living conditions, so when you are
stupid you will think the past as if it were today and this is not in
accordance with rationality and logic, but today economy is much more
powerful and we are much more organized and we are more sophisticated,
this is why we are not practicing domination (like slavery etc.), and i
think we are less violent too, this is also what we call civilization.

You have to understand "national" communism of China,
and you have to understand national socialism of
nazism and neo-nazism to understand better the
essence of western countries !

You have to call national socialism of neo-nazism
and nazism by more "expressiveness" to understand more
neo-nazism and nazism, this name of national socialism
of neo-nazism and nazism is not the right definition
of neo-nazism or nazism, because neo-nazism and nazism
is also more violent "racism" and it is also national socialism,
so when neo-nazis or nazis call themselves national
socialists they are not telling the truth ! because
they are also more violent "racism", and this more violent
"racism" is the weakness of "morality" ! because the
weakness of morality as i have proved bellow , is
the fact that morality is quality and morality is perfection
as i have proved it bellow ! so morality can be , like
neo-nazism, as extremism of quality or perfection such
as saying that morality is performance that
can hurt people, because neo-nazism and nazism
is more violent "racism" that say that
people must be "perfected" even by eliminating
handicaped people and by eliminating more and more inferior people,
because morality of neo-nazism and nazism is much
much more oriented towards performance, it's extremism
of quality and perfection ! and this is the weakness
of morality , because morality is perfection and morality
is quality as i have proved it bellow.. so this
is why i have talked about what i called guidance
of moral to avoid this weakness of morality.


More about the essence of neo-nazism

You have to understand deeply neo-nazism, and to understand
it you have to understand the mind of Hitler, Hitler was
not only national socialism , but also more violent racism,
and this more violent racism was more violent racism towards
its people and towards other races ! because the main point
of nazism is the fact the they want to "perfect" there people even
using violence, and by more "expressiveness" we can say
that they are "extremism" of morality, because morality
is quality and morality is perfection as i have
proved it in my previous posts, but you can have, as Hitler,
the tendency to think that "perfection" is a high priority
to be able to succeed, but this is only thinking, it is
theory, but in practice you will find that the way of perfection
of Hitler render the system less confident towards governance
and render the system and people more violent, this is why the "defect"
of Hitler is that he has thought "theorically" that "perfection" is the
solution and it was the high priority to be able to succeed, and he has
given it "too" much importance and he has believed in it
and apply it in practice, but in practice it has given "horrible"
consequences and nazism has attracted more violent people,
because it was violent.

I give you an example to be able to understand nazism:

Nazism is like saying that we must go much faster and much faster
because we have to succeed, but in practice going much faster and much
faster make us also suffer more ! this is the big "defect" of nazism !
it's "extremism" of morality that has horrible consequences !

Read the rest to understand more my thoughts:

About the essence of neo-nazism..

I am more "smart" to understand better neo-nazism,
nazism and neo-nazism is a violent ideology that
statistically has attracted more violent people,
they are "genetically" more violent, so you have
to not waste your time with nazis and neo-nazis
because they are "genetically" more violent than you,
and you can easily make some statistics by
looking at there violent behavior on internet that
will make you more aware that neo-nazis and nazis
are genetically more violent people, so you
have not to waste your time with neo-nazis
and nazis because they are more violent and
there ideology is violent , and there socialism
is complete failure, and there stupidity above all
is that neo-nazis and nazis want us to believe that
they are national socialism ! but this is not truth
because they are also more violent racism towards there
people and towards the others, and the main point
of this violent racism of neo-nazism and nazism is
that they want to "perfect" there society even by
using violence, read more what i wrote before to
understand more:

About neo-nazism and nazism..

I was thinking more and more neo-nazism and nazism,
i think the main point of neo-nazism and nazism is
that they want to "perfect" because they are more violent "racists"
from inside and more violent "racists" from outside, they are racist
towards there people, because they want to perfect there people
by "selection" and "discrimination" and "elimination" , there
system is violent, because they start by eliminating the handicaped
people among there people, and after that they eliminate the inferiors
and those that are not so "useful" among there people to "perfect" more
and more there people, and since the society is advancing, so when we
start to have a more advanced artificial intelligence , neo-nazism and
nazism will start to eliminate the inferiors that are not useful , since
artificial intelligence will make lot of us not useful, so neo-nazism
and nazism is a "violent" system, because this way of thinking of
neo-nazism and nazism does bring violence inside the system, they render
the system much more violent, so this is not "order" and this
can be interpreted as not the "appropriate" morality, so neo-nazism
and nazism is an inferior thinking since they don't take "correctly"
into account the criterion of "security".


About our essence..

You have seen me writing political philosophy..

And you have seen me proving that: morality is reliability and morality
is quality and morality is perfection, how can it be perfection ? since
perfection is a high "priority", and we have to "prioritize" to succeed,
but this is not a "finality", because morality is constrained ! because
our essence we white people is knowing how to embellish the world and
how to take into account beautifulness and love, this is what i called
"guidance" of moral, because morality is a composition of a priori pure
moral inferred from reason and from empirical moral inferred from
experience, but morality is also quality and perfection, but guidance
of moral is "like" part of morality, because our essence of white people
is here to constrain morality to not being extremism of perfection and
extremism of quality that hurts, and this guidance of moral, that is
inherent to our essence we white people, knows how to take into account
embellishment and beautifulness and love and how to bring embellishment
and beautifulness and love to our world, this is the strong point
of white people, so we have to be be more responsable we white people ,
because we are part of the "guidance" of moral that constrain morality
into the right direction.

About the essence of racism

I am a white arab, and you have seen me doing political philosophy here,
i am also of a type of a gentleman, and i am more serious computer
programming, and i have studied more operational research, and
i have done more mathematics, i am a more "technical" kind of
person, i am like more scientific, so the question of today
is what is the essence of racism and how racism must be constrained
by morality ?

The essence of racism, is the essence of weakness or the essence of
imperfection, you don't like people that are inferior or imperfect,
this is why you are racism or you are discrimination towards your
people or towards others, so how this must be constrained by morality ?

I think the problem that we have today is that you are getting racist
with arabs, and this is not "morality", because look at me here,
i am a gentleman and i am capable of thinking correctly ,
so you have to distinguish between good or tolerable people and bad
people, so you have to distinguish between good or tolerable arabs and
bad arabs and not hurt good or tolerable arabs, this is what we call
morality, but i am noticing that many are still "inferior" thinking by
not making the difference and being more responsable.

I will invite you to read my following thinking about political
philosophy to understand better my thoughts:


Here is my new thoughts of today about political philosophy..

Now we know what is quality, quality is the degree of excellence
of something..

But what is reliability ?

We say in computer science that if we increase the mean time between
failures, we increase reliability, but is reliability only increasing
the mean time between failures ? i don't think so, because we can say,
if we put the reference as being "perfect", that less performance
is like a "bug" or a "bad" that "hurts" the system compared to being
perfect. So being more performance is being more reliability too, also
being less beautifulness can be considered as a state that can
make us less well being, so it is like a "bug" in the system that hurts
to a certain level, so we can say that being more beautiful is being
more reliability, and being less perfection can be considered as a state
that can make us less well being, so it is like a "bug" in the system,
so perfection is reliability, and perfection is quality,
so reliability is quality, but what is morality? i think morality
is maximizing the degree of excellence at best , so then morality
is quality that too maximizes the degree of quality at best,
so from the above we can say that morality is perfection and perfection
is reliability and then morality is reliability. This is in accordance
with my proof bellow, so since morality is quality and morality is
perfection, then how can we avoid extremism of perfection or quality
that hurts the system ? i think morality is constrained by people
of the system or by Democracy that is the tool to avoid extremism
of perfection and quality that hurts.

More profond about philosophy now..

More precision about philosophy..

We have to get into more "calculations" and more "precision" to
understand better, this is what we call also philosophy, so i said
before that:

==
And the "set" of morality contains: cleanliness.

And from cleanliness we get decency and cleanliness generate also
a more scientific mind, because to be more cleanliness we have to
know how to think better, and from cleanliness we get security too,
and cleanliness generate morality.
==


Here is my logical proof about: cleanliness generate morality

Since morality is all about what is bad and what is good,
so a weaker definition of morality is the act of distinguishing
between the good and bad, but this is a "weaker" definition,
because to be able to distinguish between the good and the bad
we have to be more rationality and/or more science, but
as i said before that "cleanliness" generate also
a more scientific mind, because to be more cleanliness we have to
know how to think better, so by less espressiveness we can
say that cleanliness contains the "requirement" of being a more
scientific mind, this is like "inherent" to cleanliness, because
"cleanliness" needs to be more and more "perfect" so that to avoid
the "bad" of imperfection or weakness, so this is why
the right requirements are inherent to "cleanliness", so it makes my
following affirmation correct and true: cleanliness generate morality

I said before that:

cleanliness generate morality

But what about Donald Trump that said that:

Haiti and many african countries are shithole countries.

Is Donald Trump "cleanliness" to say so ?

You have to understand better "cleanliness", cleanliness
is knowing how to "balance" the "requirements", so
you have to take into account "security" and be less
provocative than Donald Trump, this is why Donald Trump is
not the right requirement of "security" to say the above
about many african countries and about haiti, because
Donald Trump is more "virility" that is more "violent"
and that does not balance with the other requirements
of "sensibility" and "morality" to be better security.

Now i give you another example:

Neo-nazism is saying that arabs are not
as beautiful as white europeans, so they want to discriminate
them and to be more violent with them, but this neo-nazism is an
immature morality, because we have to know how to transcend it towards
a better world that takes into account "usefulness" and
"security" and "economy", so this is why the requirements
of today is to have a more interconnected economies
around the world, even with arabs and with africans,
this is because we have to take into account
the economic growth of arab and african countries that
is for example more attractive for economic investment,
also we have to take into account the consumer
confidence index globally and locally,
so we have to know how to be "respect" towards arabs
and africans, and we have also to take into
account the "usefulness" of arabs and africans, because
many western countries bring arab and african immigrants
because they are useful for jobs and because they are also
useful for low birth rate of white europeans , and also you have to
know, like have said Fordism, how to give the necessary wages to
others(even globally) to be able for them to buy
your products and services, so i have also proved and said that:
cleanliness generate morality, but as i have just explained that
"cleanliness" must know how to take into account the right requirements
as i said above, and it must know how to balance the "requirements".


Read the rest:

Read the rest of my thoughts to understand better:

I will get into more philosophy..

As you have noticed i have said that morality is defined as: reliability
or by more expressiveness by: performance and reliability.

Now to "model" better humans, we have the following:

sensibility, morality, rationality, virility, intelligence, and language

And the "set" of morality contains: cleanliness.

And from cleanliness we get decency and cleanliness generate also
a more scientific mind, because to be more cleanliness we have to
know how to think better, and from cleanliness we get security too,
and cleanliness generate morality,

Now from "sensibility" we get love and we get security too.

And from "rationality" we get a mind that is more rational and more logic.

from "virility" we get more performance , but if virility is not
"constrained" by the others such as morality and sensibility and
rationality, we can get violence and insecurity.

I think this is how we can "model" better humans both "genetically" and
"culturally".

Here is my other new thoughts..

What i am doing is finding the essence of things like in philosophy
and i am using the tool of logic that permits also to "measure"
and to "calculate" precisely like in mathematics and it permits to
reason better, so what is my new thoughts of today ? as you have noticed
i have defined previously what is morality, it is like finding its
"essence" that i have done in my previous post, now an important
question is inferred from this act of thinking, is that what is
the essence of our "civilization" ? finding its essence with more
"precise" thinking is an act of "philosophy", so what is its essence ?
i think its essence is coming from the fact that a process or a thing
can have an advantage and a disadvantage, and the general "reference" is
morality that is, by more expressiveness, "performance" and
"reliability", or simply "reliability" that can model morality correctly
as i have proved it in my previous post, so the essence of our
civilization is the act of coordinating and organizing those advantages
and disadvantages on each of us or on each thing or in each process to
be capable of giving an efficient morality that has as an essence
"performance" and "reliability", and as a validation of my model, you
will notice that we are decentralizing "governance", and each of the
decentralized parts of the governance are grouping the "advantages" and
trying to minimize the disadvantages of each of us that do the
governance , democracy is also the same , because democracy is a system
that wants to escape a "local" maximum towards a global maximum
like in artificial intelligence, and democracy is doing it by
applying itself to selecting the best among the actors of
politics etc. to govern us, this is the essence of civilization,
is the act of maximizing the benefits or the advantages by optimization,
as i have just explained to you, so hope you are understanding
my new thoughts of today. And about what is the essence of morality,
here is again my own post that speaks about it ( i have corrected few
typos in it):

What is it to be morality ?

This is the most important part of our humanity !

I have proved before that performance is inherent to morality,
and i have showed also that my definition, and that i have
proved, that morality is reliability does show that it ressembles
serious computer programming, and to be more expressiveness you see that
performance is inherent to reliability , so reliability
does model efficiently, and we are feeling it like serious
computer programming, because when you define morality
like this by "precise" words , you begin to feel our
essence and you begin to feel the essence of our humanity !
and you become aware that morality is also being capable
and being capable to comprehend ! because this makes us
distinguish the essence of morality ! so you have to not be fooled
by inferior thinking ! because morality is reliability and
reliability is performance too and the application of morality
is part of morality , so the case is closed that morality
of today must be also scientific disciplines and technical disciplines
and morality is the measure of morality that must be reliability
and performance in itself ! this is what is amazing ! you have
to feel it like this and be responsable about it.

Read the rest:

From where can we infer that "performance" is inherent to morality ?

Philosophically we can say that the essence of organization is: we are
organizing because of our weaknesses to transcend our weaknesses, so
from this we can feel the essence of our humanity and we can feel our
essence , because the essence of humanity that is perfection and
strongness is dictated by survival too ! and is dictated by the fact
that we must transcend our living conditions towards a better world ! so
this is part of morality, so then we can say that performance is
inherent to morality.

So my way of thinking and proving shows better what must be the
conception of our organization as a society, it must also be based on
"performance".

I wrote previously this:

Is performance inherent to morality ?

This is good philosophical question !

This is why you have seen me modeling efficient morality
by only one word, by saying and proving that: efficient morality
or morality is: Reliability.

Or by more expressiveness by saying that:

Efficient morality or morality is: Performance and reliability.

So this definition that i have proved shows clearly
that performance is "inherent" to morality or efficient morality.

So my way of thinking and proving shows better what must be the
conception of our organization as a society, it must also be based on
"performance".

Please read the rest of my post to understand better:

What is the essence of reliability?

Can we model efficient morality without it as being also "performance" ?

This is a good philosophical question !

I think the right definition of "reliability" is that of not being "bad".

So not being efficient is also being not being good, so reliability
can model efficiency, that means performance too.

This why also we can define efficient morality by only one word that is:

RELIABILITY.


Please read all the following to understand better my thoughts:

About Wise egoism

I have showed that the essence of tolerance is:

The essence of tolerance is consciousness of our weaknesses !
and it is an act that is caused by consciousness of our weaknesses
or by our weaknesses.

So wise egoism dictates to be a "usefulness" or a "utility" to the other
because of the essence of tolerance, so this is why we have to be more
useful to sell our products or services to others internationally
and locally, and this usefulness give rise to consumer confidence index
that constrain egoism to be more "tolerance" and more "respect" towards
others and constrain it to share more with others.


About tolerance..

What is it the essence of tolerance ?

Does it has an essence ?

It is this what we call philosophy..

When you become more smart you will find the shortest path to the
solution..

So i will answer it like this:

The essence of tolerance is consciousness of our weaknesses !
and it is an act that is caused by consciousness of our weaknesses
or by our weaknesses.

Its essence is the same as the essence of "organization" !

We are organizing because of our weaknesses too !

because if we were Gods, the need of organizing as a group will be
"much" lesser !

This is the essence of our humanity that is perfection and strongness,
and perfection and strongness is also saying that efficient morality
is performance and reliability. It is like serious computer programming,
you can also model efficient morality with only one word that is:
"reliability", but to be more "expressive", i have said that efficient
morality is performance and reliability, and you are feeling it
when you become a more serious programmer like me.

So what is the essence of efficiency?

Efficiency is part of optimization, efficiency is: you have the
ressources that is our universe(we are part of the universe) and our
other universes, and you have to produce an output from this input that
is our universe or universes that is performant, it is performance.

But what is the essence of reliability?

Reliability is the quality of performing consistently well.

Does efficiency model correctly portability in software programming ?

I think yes because we are this portability because portability is
performance of portability that is to be able to run your software
in different hardwares or operating systems, and that's i think also
performance.

And does efficiency or reliability model correctly usability?

I think yes.

Does "reliability" model correctly beautifulness ?

I think more beautifulness can mean a "good" thing, and if
it is a good thing , it is not a bug of saying it is a bad thing
, so reliability do model beautifulness correctly.

And we can generalize and say:

Because morality is all about what is bad and what is good, so
what is bad is like a bug that causes the system to be bad, so
if it is bad, it is like a bug that makes the system not "reliable",
and it is related to reliability.

This is why i have modeled efficient morality with two words by saying:

Efficient morality is performance and reliability, and it is
like finding the essence of morality.

I said above that:

The essence of tolerance is consciousness of our weaknessess !

So the essence of tolerance is related to security, so it is
related to reliablity, so "reliability" do model tolerance too.


Here is my new and extended post about philosophy and politics..

Yet more precision and more calculations , please follow with me:

The essence of Class Struggle

An idiot will say that Class Struggle such as of communism
is not correct !

But philosophy is not the same , in philosophy you have
to be more rigorous like in mathematics !

I will get on more philosophy..

I think the nature of Class Struggle of communism
has changed a little bit in the West, i mean Class Struggle
of communism has soften, but it is still Class Struggle !
i mean that "Democracy" and "usefulness" or to make
yourself a "utility" or to make yourself "useful" are also Class
Struggle ! and consumerism do bring the counter-power of consumer
confidence index that we have to higher internationally and locally, so
this counter power of consumer confidence index is like Class Struggle
also, this is what i have said bellow that the essence of compassion is
the essence of humanity that is perfection and strongness. And this is
why i have spoken about the essence of Israel in a such
way, because making yourself "useful" is also a wise egoism
that lesser egoism of nationalism and egoism. Here is what i have said:

About the essence of Israel...

You have seen me in my political philosophy introducing to you what i
called guidance of moral as embellishment of humanity, and i have
defined it as being like: happiness and tolerance that are parts of the
set of our essence ! because we are capable of knowing them and feeling
them and measuring with them.

So now there is an important question related to the essence of Israel..

Do we have to judge Israel by this guidance of moral, by saying
for example that Israel is not tolerance and is not happiness
of guidance of moral ?

This is not the right way to measure, you have to be wisdom that knows
how to measure ! so efficient morality that is performance and
reliability must be used as a soft way also that constrain the
spirit of Israel, so Israel must know that efficient morality
must be capable of "balancing" well or "tuning" well if you want, i give
you an example: today we are trying to be efficient morality
that is taking into account not just our today but also taking
into account the future of our planet earth that we have not to hurt
with excessive pollution and exploitation ! this is the kind of spirit
that lacks Israel ! because nationalism must be constrained by the
essence of humanity that is perfection and strongness, so perfection is
that Israel has to know how to think the after and the after after with
arabs, so we have to be frank between us, i think like was saying it
Fordism, consumerism or economy between Israel and arab countries is the
right solution that will bring peace and prosperity, and arabs has to
know it and be capable of being useful to Israel and Israel has to be
capable of being useful to arabs , the interdependence of the two
economies of Israel and arabs will create good relations between arab
countries and Israel.


And i have said also that:

Is Donald Trump nationalism ?

We have to be smart, what do i think about Donald Trump ?
is Donald Trump nationalism ? i think it is a really good
question of philosophy ! so what do thinks philosophy about
it ? i think that we have to look at it from the perspective of
my philosophy that is in accordance with efficient morality,
because philosophy also must adhere to efficient morality to
be able to be called a high standard of philosophy, this
is why i think from my writing of before, that Donald Trump
do adhere to my rule that is: survival is usefulness ! and
as you have noticed that we are more lucky with empirical moral
inferred from experience, because the tools of today are
much more enhanced to bring more dignity to the table,
so if i just say that: survival is usefulness and usefulness
is egoism and survival is egoism.. so if you are less smart you will
think that it is not acceptable, but a smart person will say
that it adheres to the standard of efficient morality that is
as i have defined it: performance and reliability, this is
why we have to be more confident with it, and not be blind and
notice that when i say: survival is usefulness, it is said
in a "context" of today, so it brings many contraints that
provoke quality and bring more quality, usefulness do
cause the rise of different actors as powers and counter-powers,
but don't be stupid to see it as an evil war, because
the tools of today are much more advanced and enhanced, so we have to
be more optimistic about it, because survival is usefulness
and usefulness is egoism and egoism has brought consumer confidence
index that we have to higher internationally and locally, this egoism
is the solution to egoism and nationalism, because consumerism
and consumer confidence index has completely constrained
natonalism and egoism in such a manner that it has lesser
egoism and make the actors of economy to share more with third world
countries and other countries , also usefulness of competitiveness
between different actors of economy has played the same role of egoism
that is the solution to egoism and nationalism, because also
competitiveness and consumerism has completely constrained nationalism
and egoism in such a manner that it has lesser egoism and make the
actors of economy to share more with third world countries and other
countries, and you will notice it from how Donald Trump is talking about
economy by saying the following:

US President Donald Trump on Friday said that "America first does not
mean America alone," even as he maintained his country would remain his
top priority. He reminded the audience that "American prosperity created
countless jobs in world."
"As President of the United States, I will always put America first...
America first does not mean America alone. When the United States grows,
so does the world,"

Read more here to notice it:

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/international-business/america-first-does-not-mean-america-alone-us-president-donald-trump-at-wef/articleshow/62664653.cms

So as you have noticed "usefulness" as concept of my rule:
survival is usefulness, is a broader concept that models better
than simply saying like Fordism that consumerism brings prosperity
and peace, because usefulness is a much brother concept that models
better and brings prosperity and peace etc.

The essence of compassion..

We have to do more philosophy to know about it..

What about compassion ?

What is the essence of compassion ?

You have to deeply think philosophy to understand it,
the essence of compassion is the essence of humanity
that is perfection and strongness, the essence of
compassion comes the fact that i said before that:

==
"because a society is constrained by general morality such as laws
that states that what is bad is "relative" to our
level of sophistication by performance and reliability or if you want
that it is relative to the level of quality that we have attained, this
is why i have said, that corruption of morality is measured by
the level of "quality" that we have attained or if you want by the
essence of humanity that is perfection and strongness"

Is there any contradiction or is there a "bug" ?

No, in the above i have said that: "because a society is constrained by
general morality such as laws that states that what is bad is
"relative" to our level of sophistication by performance and reliability"

So i am stating that it is the level of quality that we have attained
by performance and reliability, so morality is constrained by
reliability, so you can not simply say that corruption of morality is
measured by the level of "quality", this will introduce a "bug" that
can bring violence to the system, so measuring of corruption of
morality is measured by and relative to performance and reliability, so
hope you have understood this distinction. And morality is then safe !
==


So the essence of compassion is a balance of powers ! it's
like a balance of powers and counter-powers, this is the essence
of our humanity, perfection and strongness has given rise
to powers and couner-powers that bring more quality to the table !
so without being extermist, i will say that this has the same
effect of "Class Struggle" in communism, because this
brings embellishment and this brings justice and this bring quality,
because look at what i was saying about handicaped people:

If we ask a question of: is handicaped people useful ?

Compassion of government (in form of help) is applied on handicaped
people because i think this is "useful" as a way to embellish our world,
also it is "useful" because the government risks to be punished by
people if he doesn't help handicaped people, and also we risk violence
inside the system if government doesn't help handicaped people.

So as you have noticed that governement is "constrained" by
counter-powers to be able to help handicaped people.

And the essence of compassion is the same as the essence of Democracy,
because as you have noticed i said before that:

About dictatorship and communism and the dictatorship

The problem with those is the problem of the past, because there is
a necessity to provoke and bring quality with the introduction of new
mechanisms, like the mechanisms of the counter-power of consumerism and
consumer confidence index, and like the mechanism of the power of
democracy, and like the mechanism of the counter-power of the financial
and bank institutions that have there rating methodology that take into
account the Political Risk factor and the economic conditions, and this
creates more quality and a world stability, this balance of powers
ensure us of more stability and more quality and more security, this is
the weakness of dictatorship and communism, they lack some of or all of
those mechanisms that bring more quality.


I have said yesterday the following:

--
Does morality exists ?

It is a very good philosophical question !

And that also is the most important question !

I have just thought more about it, and you have to listen to this:

I have defined and proved that efficient morality as being:

Performance and reliability.

But you have to understand something deeper than this !

Democracy of today is a balance of power between "performance" and
"reliability", democracy is like a process that balance more correctly
the two powers of: performance in one side and reliability in the other
side ! and this then can be defined as a more appropriate morality.

But dictatorship like dictatorship of China can not be called
appropriate morality, because it doesn't have the correct mechanism of
democracy to balance more correctly between performance and reliability.

This is why Dictatorship is dangerous ! and dictatorship can not be
called an appropriate morality ! .
--


I have said the above because look at nazism and neo-nazism, nazism and
neo-nazism is racism, but you have not to be fooled by nazism and
neo-nazism, because it is racism also from inside the system and racism
from outside the system, this is why it has persecuted the handicaped
people ! because this kind of racism is "maximization" of efficiency !
and this "maximization" of efficiency is "performance", so
since as i have showed that efficient morality is performance
and reliability, so nazism and neo-nazism do neglect "reliability"
, because there maximization of efficiency is violence that causes
violence inside the system. This is why i have said above that
dictatorship doesn't "balance" correctly between performance and
reliability.

I have said , read bellow, that:

Hitler viewed jews as being "anormal" and more "violent"

and i have said, read bellow, that:

Nazism was not based correctly on science

We have to be more scientific:

So we have to ask ourselves a question:

Is the affirmation of Hitler correct or not correct ?

Is the affirmation of Hitler such as saying that jews are abnormal
and more violent , correct or not correct ?

I think that Hitler was not correct, because we can not say all jews
are bad people, there is a certain still small "percentage" of jews
that are bad, but we can not generalize to all jews and say all
jews are bad, this is the same for arabs, we can not say all arabs are
bad people, because there is only a still "small" percentage of arabs
that are bad, but we can not generalize and say that all arabs are bad.
So we have to refrain from talking like Hitler and we have to be more
realistic. And yet we have to make a distinction between "tolerable"
and bad, because the big percentage of arabs are "tolerable" and not
bad, i think it is the same for jews, even if they are not as beautiful
as white europeans. So case is closed !


Please read the rest of my post to understand better:

More precision about the true essence of nazism, read again:

We have to get into philosophy , philosophy is like mathematics
and it must adhere to the essence of humanity that is perfection and
strongness , so it must be "precise" and precise "calculations", and
its goal must be the goal of wisdom that is to comprehend or to know !

So what is the true essence of nazism?

1- The living conditions

The living conditions of Germans in the time of Hitler were still too
much difficult, so German people were suffering, because life in the
time of Hitler was still a real difficult task.

2- The consequence

The consequence of this really bad living conditions is that Hitler
was much more violent than average people, so he has
choosen to "maximize" "efficiency" because he was a true "racist" and
nazism was also "racism", so he has started violently to kill handicaped
people to be more efficient, and to maximize efficiency he has started
to kill jews, because jews for him were an evil for different reasons:
because also he has viewed jews as being capitalists ! so since he was
socialist, he has used, like communists, the tool of "Class Struggle" of
communism and he has started violently persecuting jews and killing
them, communists also has persecuted the capitalists !
also Hitler has wanted to kill jews because he has viewed jews
as being "anormal" and more "violent", even if his thinking was not
based on science ! that was also the weakness of nazism, because
this was not based on science. For example when Hitler has said
that German people was the superior "race" over the others,
yet this affirmation was not based on science, so i think
also that nazism was not based correctly on science.

And here is my other proof that nazism and neo-nazism
are not accepted by efficient morality:

Futility of nazism and neo-nazism..

Nazism and neo-nazism are childish in that they want violently to
maximize efficiency, this is the essence of nazism , it wants also
to maximize efficiency even using violence, so we can not be confident
with nazism and neo-nazism because they are like childish ideologies
because they are not thought correctly.

You have to know about efficient morality, i have said that efficient
morality is performance and reliability, and morality is composed of
a priori pure moral inferred from reason and empirical moral inferred
from experience, but that's not so efficient because we have to include
what i called "guidance of moral": like happiness and tolerance that are
parts of the "set" of our essence, because we are capable of knowing
them and feeling them and measuring with them, i think that this
guidance of moral is a prerequisite to counter nazism and neo-nazism,
because nazism says to maximize efficiency even with violence, but since
guidance of moral that is inherent to us and a priori pure moral that
takes into account reliability says that this act of nazism that
maximize efficiency even with violence that it is an extremism that is
too violent, because reliability sees this act of nazism as being too
violent that causes violence, and guidance of moral that is inherent to
almost all of us sees this act of nazism as being not acceptable , so
nazism and neo-nazism is out of question and they are not accepted by
efficient morality.

The essence of Nazism..

So what is the essence of Nazism ?

When we become smart we have to find the shortest path to the solution,
here it is:

Nazism is also racism, but this racism of nazism is a violent racism
that maximizes efficiency, and this racism that maximizes efficiency is
a racism towards others that are not us, and it is a violent racism
towards us, this is why nazism has tried to exterminate handicaped
people, but you have to be careful with nazism because it tries also to
exterminate the weak members to maximize efficiency, this is inherent to
nazism, so imagine that we are attaining general artificial
intelligence, so nazism can say by maximizing efficiency
to exterminate humans that are not needed for a best efficiency,
this is why nazism or neo-nazism is violent and dangerous.



I have said:

"because a society is constrained by general morality such as laws
that states that what is bad is "relative" to our
level of sophistication by performance and reliability or if you want
that it is relative to the level of quality that we have attained, this
is why i have said, that corruption of morality is measured by
the level of "quality" that we have attained or if you want by the
essence of humanity that is perfection and strongness"

Is there any contradiction or is there a "bug" ?

No, in the above i have said that: "because a society is constrained by
general morality such as laws that states that what is bad is
"relative" to our level of sophistication by performance and reliability"

So i am stating that it is the level of quality that we have attained
by performance and reliability, so morality is constrained by
reliability, so you can not simply say that corruption of morality is
measured by the level of "quality", this will introduce a "bug" that
can bring violence to the system, so measuring of corruption of
morality is measured by and relative to performance and reliability, so
hope you have understood this distinction. And morality is then safe !

Read again my "final" corrected post

About our humanity

What do you think i have done also by constructing my political philosophy ?

I have done like philosophy.

And i have showed that the essence of our humanity is perfection and
strongness that gives rise to "hate", it is that we want to be
perfection and more strong that we hate the others, also i have showed
what is morality and what is efficient morality, i have showed that
efficient morality is performance and reliability, it is like saying it
is the essence of humanity that is perfection and strongness, and
efficient morality that is performance and reliability gives rise
to a level of "quality" by wich we are measuring corruption of morality,
because a society is constrained by general morality such as laws
that states that what is bad is "relative" to our
level of sophistication by performance and reliability or if you want
that it is relative to the level of quality that we have attained, this
is why i have said, that corruption of morality is measured by
the level of "quality" that we have attained or if you want by the
essence of humanity that is perfection and strongness, and it is how
also we are measuring craziness or foolishness , by this level of
quality that we have attained, it's this "relativeness" that permits us
to measure corrruption of morality.

Please read the rest of my thoughts:

About the essence of philosophy

What do you think is philosophy?

How do you think you can understand the essence of laws and laws?

How do you think you can understand morality ?

Philosophy is like the light that has given rise to morality !

Let me please ask you a question ?

If i ask a question of how can you measure corruption of morality
and i ask you to come up with an efficient answer that abstract well,
you have to be capable of "philosophy", this is what i am doing..

Philosophy is like feeling better our world, it is feeling the essence
of its parts !

When i say for example in my philosophy that essence of humanity
is perfection and strongness, you are feeling more this essence,
and you start to be more efficient in your thinking , and when
i say that relativeness that is part of our essence do permit
us to measure corruption by relativeness to the essence of
our humanity that is perfection and strongness, you are again
feeling more the essence of our humanity, and philosophy permit
you to climb and to climb by knowing the essence of our humanity
and by comprehending more, for example i have proved that
efficient morality is morality is performance and reliability,
but this definition lacks abstraction, because idiocy of maximization of
efficiency of neo-nazism and nazism will interpret it not correctly,
so we have to be efficient abstraction that knows how to define
morality with the right words that model correctly morality
as a whole ! this is how i am doing in my political philosophy,
i am climbing and climbing..

Please read again, to notice it:

Do we have to fear morality ?

I said before that efficient morality is performance and reliability,
those two, performance and reliability do model efficient morality as a
whole ! but this is not a finality, because efficient morality is
constrained by empirical moral that says that "intolerance" that hurts
the system causes violence in the system, and efficient morality is
constrained also by what i called guidance of moral and is constrained
by "security" that is part of the the essence of efficient morality that
is reliability, this is why you are feeling that morality must be
abstracted correctly, and abstraction is the act of abstracting also to
the "essentials" or to the "priorities": if you want, so if i say to you
that efficient morality is performance and reliability , that's
like a necessary definition that approximate more correctly efficient
morality , but to be more "precise" and more precise calculations like
though it is scientific, and that's also the goal of wisdom ! we have
to abstract efficiently ! so a good abstraction do dictats to us
to include in morality what i called guidance of moral that is like
happiness and tolerance that are parts of the "set" of our essence,
because we are capable of knowing them and feeling them and measuring
with them ! not only that but guidance of moral must be showed correctly
in the definition of efficient morality, this guidance of moral shows us
also the good way and permits us to "measure" more correctly and permits
us to be more tolerant ! and guidance of moral is a light to our
democracy ! this is part of the essence of relativeness that is the
most important part of our essence that permits us to measure corruption
of morality by relativeness to the essence of our humanity that is
perfection and strongness ! and please read the rest to be better
equipped and to understand better my thoughts:

The essence of corruption of morality

This is a good subject of philosophy, philosophy is like
mathematics, and wisdom is like mathematics, because
the goal of wisdom is to comprehend ! and to comprehend
you have to constrain more by the essence of humanity,
that means by perfection and strongness ! how are perfection and
strongness useful ! survival is usefulness ! we can not separate
the two ! it is a dictatorship that constrain democracy !
it is as it dictates to democracy ! and we are noticing
it and feeling it with our consciousness ! and we are
feeling it with what i called guidance of moral that
is like happiness and tolerance that are parts of the "set" of our
essence, because we are capable of knowing them and feeling them and
measuring with them, and how we must be careful to notice that
the "application" of morality as an efficient morality is part
of the essence of morality and this is the most important part
that gives rise to a scientific discipline and a technical discipline,
that's also "beautifulness" of our humanity, the essence of humanity is
perfection and strongness that make us able to measure corruption !
the essence of corruption is also "relativeness" that is being part
of it and it is as if we say that such part is relative to such
part ! "relativeness" also is our essence ! and it is one of the most
important part ! how can we be lost without it ! because relativeness
to efficient morality is the correct way, and efficient morality
is performance and reliability, i mean that performance and reliability
alone do model efficient morality as a whole, and i have proved it
to you in my previous posts, so corruption of morality is also
relativeness to performance and reliability, this is why you have seeing
me saying on my previous posts the following:

I have defined efficient morality as being: Performance and reliability.

But is it a correct definition?

Because morality is all about what is bad and what is good, so
what is bad is like a bug that causes the system to be bad, so
if it is bad, it is like a bug that makes the system not reliable, this
is why i have said that efficient morality is Performance and reliability.

Please read the rest of my post to understand better:

I will get into political philosophy..

Here is my new post about the essence of a group and how it's related
to the general morality..

I will first remember you about my last writing about the essence
of humanity:

And what is the essence of humanity ?

This is a good question in political philosophy.

When you will become more smart you will know how to answer this
question, and when you will become smarter you will try to find fast the
shortest path to the solution, so to be able to find the shortest path
to the solution of the above question, you have to transform the
question on a similar question, and the similar question is: what is the
important ingredients that describe what is the essence of humanity? it
is how you will answer the above question, so what is those important
ingredients ?

I think the ingredients are:

Perfection and Strongness.

The essence of humanity is that we are becoming more perfection and at
the same time we are becoming more Strong and at the same time we are
becoming more organized and less disorganized.


This is the essence of humanity, we are becoming more perfection.


And this brings also hope.


I have explained that the essence of a human and the essence of humanity
is perfection.

Am i stupid to say that ?

If you have noticed i have said that we can not content ourselves with
"nothing", we must evolve from nothing to more perfection to better
survive etc.

So human is composed of body and culture or spirit or what's in the
brain of a human, but the body was constrained by the constrains of
nature to be more "perfection", this is why perfection is its essence
also, and the body must organize from not moving into moving and that's
"perfection" also, and the spirit of a human or culture of a human or
what's in the brain of a human evolve from nothing to something better
to be able to do something to survive etc. and this is
what we call "perfection", so human being and humanity is constructed
and guided by the essence of humanity that is perfection, and better we
can say that the essence of human and humanity is perfection.

Now here is my new post about the essence of a group and how it's
related to the general morality:

Now i have explained that the essence of humanity is "Perfection" and
also Strongness, and perfection and strongness is also the essence of a
group, because we are also grouping together into different groups to be
more perfection and more strong, but this essence of humanity that is
Perfection and strongness
must adhere to the general morality that must be an efficient morality,
but if it is not in accordance with the general morality, we must
enforce also general morality by laws, it is why we are managing our
societies by laws.

But what is also an efficient morality ?

About the essence of communism

You have not to fear communism, because empirical moral does constrain
it, it is like a general mathematical proof, communism must adhere
to optimization , because optimization is efficient morality, and
efficient morality is Liberty, and corruption of morality must
be measured by optimization itself that knows how to be optimization,
communism is finally being more conscious of itself, because
it is also more conscious of empirical moral.

What is the essence of philosophy ?

It is a very important question:

So we have to be smartness to answer this question:

Efficient morality is optimization and it is Liberty.

Philosophy is a magical word , like Liberty.

It is a generalization, it is like a general mathematical proof,
this is the essence of philosophy, philosophy must be efficient
morality, because it is a generalization, the word Philosophy is like
the King, it must adhere to the act of optimization, and optimization
is performance and reliability, now the essence of philosophy is more
clear and it shows that the essence of Beauty and the essence of
Happiness are the same , they are generalizations that must
take into account the guidance of moral and a priori pure
moral and empirical moral, and corruption of morality is measured
by optimization, and optimization must be an effort , because
Liberty is: discipline, progress and stableness, so the definition of
Liberty that is discipline and progress and stableness is a soft way
that ensure more the effort to realize this goal of Liberty, thus this
has to be enforced by the hard way too, that means by laws.

I have defined efficient morality as being performance and reliability
that includes security, so beauty is part of reliability because
reliability is the quality of performing consistently well, and to
perform consistently well, you have to be beauty and you have to be
social etc. please read my following political philosophy to understand
better my thoughts:

About the essence of optimization

I have defined optimization as being:

Performance and reliability.

But can we clear more that ?

Efficiency is part of optimization, efficiency is: you have the
ressources that is our universe(we are part of the universe) and our
other universes, and you have to produce an output from this input that
is our universe or universes that is performant, it is performance.

But if you define optimization like just being performance, that's
a dangerous definition that lacks abstraction.

Please read all the following to understand better:


What is the essence of organization ?

Those are the questions that we ask in courses of philosophy.

Now i have to be smartness and rationality and logic to answer this
question. Smartness is an important requirement that fulfill this
goal.

And you have to learn how to think Sir and Madam..

So how can we attack this problem ?

When you start thinking it is like also abstracting to the essentials to
be able to simplify our thinking..

So this process of abstraction needs also my smartness to decompose
efficiently...

Smartness is also a fast process that finds fast the shortest path to
the solution or that finds the solution to the problem..

So my smartness will answer like this:

Look at our essence, we are a composition of consciousness and physical
body..

But we can try to say that we are guided by the process of survival of
fittest..

But this is not good abstraction..

We have to be smartness..

So why do we need to organize ?

You will say that we have to be organized because of the process
survival of the fittest..

But this is a narrow view..

Because it is a definition that is pejorative and not efficient..

Because of the following question:

Why we need to survive better ?

It is because of our weaknesses.

But i say that it is still not a correct answer , because
it is too much abstraction that lacks efficiency.

Because our weaknesses need to be organized by optimization.

This is the magical word, it is optimization.

Why do we optimize ? to be more powerful and more reliability and
correctness.

You will ask a question such as:

Is optimization: reliability and correctness ?


My answer:

When you are not reliable and/or correctness you are less
efficient, so efficiency is also reliability and correctness.

This is why i have abstracted the essence of organization to the process
of optimization.

But that's lacking Abstraction.

Because we have to look at the composition of optimization.

Optimization is performance and reliability.

So that the essence of organization is the composition of optimization
that is performance and reliability.

So the essence of optimization is not only performance , but it is
reliability.

And that's also efficient morality, and efficient morality is Liberty
and Liberty is efficient morality.

So now my answer is not finished:

Because the optimization is constrained..

Because corruption of morality is related to optimization..

So how can we measure corruption of morality ?

What is corruption of morality ?

This is an interesting subject..

It's like abstracting, you have to decompose and compose..

You can say for example what are the causes of corruption of morality?

You can say what is the consequences of corruption ?

You can define efficiently morality to be able to know about corruption.

So if you define morality you will define it as a composition of:

Guidance of moral, and a priori pure moral and empirical moral.

And now you see that the difficulty is how to set the reference to be
able to measure corruption of morality with it.

What is the reference of morality ?

The reference must be optimization that knows how to be optimization.

I mean that optimization can not set itself as being performance alone.

And optimization can not set itself to be extreme justice that lacks
optimization, like ignoring the optimization by the "heuristic" of
"tolerance" that optimizes the economic system and the social system.

And optimization must be an effort to maintain stableness and
reliability of the system, that means reliability of the system, this is
related to security, and security is also related to compassion and love
and respect, because neglecting compassion , love and respect do cause
extremism and violence that hurt the system.

How optimization must be this effort ? because discipline and progress
are inherent to Liberty, so you have to enforce them efficiently and
wisely by the hard way, that means by laws and by the soft way
that i talked about..

So all in all the schema seems to be more clear and seems to indicate
to us more what is corruption of morality, and it indicate to us
what is the essence of organization..


Getting more rational...

Today i will ask a question of: what is love ?

And the answer must be more rational.

So we have to use smartness..

Like the theorems of Kurt Gödel, there is something that seems happening..

If you say that there is still some suffering in your life..

You can come to a deductive conclusion that it is not love.

But if you choose a reference as being one person that is suffering more
than you, you will conclude that your "some" suffering is considered to
be part of good, and this good is part of love.

So as you have noticed there seems like there is a contradiction in the
system..

But this is just our senses, my rationality says that if the reference
is individual morality, so the person above will say that some suffering
is not love.

But if the reference is general morality of the society, you will say
that this some suffering is considered to be part of good, so it is part
of love.

So this relativeness to the general reference that is general of
morality of the society is a good measure i think.

It is like when we are asking the questions of:

What is the essence of corruption ? and how can we measure corruption ?

I have said that optimization measures corruption of morality.

How it can measure it?

Optimization is performance and reliability, and Efficiency is part of
optimization, efficiency is: you have the ressources that is our
universe(we are part of the universe) and our other universes, and you
have to produce an output from this input that is our universe or
universes that is performant, it is performance, so it is related to
the essence of quality, so today because of our own essence that
knows also about quality, we are measuring corruption of morality
by the level or degree of quality, that means by performance and
reliability, and we are measuring craziness and foolishness by the level
or degree of quality, that means by performance and reliability, so if
the level or degree of quality is lower and not tolerable, we say that
it is corruption of morality or it is craziness or foolishness.

How can we measure the level and degree of quality ?

It is like saying that such thing is relative to such thing, also it is
a process that is dynamic, so if our civilization is at time t1 is
more performant and more reliable, we say that this degree of more
reliable and more performant is the level or degree of quality that
measures corruption of morality. So optimization that is performance and
reliability measures corruption of morality in a such way.

I give you an example..

If at time t1 our civilization has only one machine or robot, and this
civilization and one robot or one machine are capable of being more
performance and more reliability with this one robot or one machine, but
they are doing less performance and less reliability, we call this
corruption of morality.

About violence

If you are genetically more violent you can be blocked in a local
maximum like in AI, so when a genetically violent person sees
a person or persons or events that he doesn't like, he can keep
fighting this person or persons or event even though he has or must
go out of a local maximum and climb to global maximum like in AI,
i mean the global maximum of the function that is survival.

So we have to be careful with genetically violent persons.

About our essence..

Capitalism is defined by:

Private ownership of the means of production, free market and
competition between economic actors.

But we have to enlarge our view, because capitalism is not
the only power that governs us, there is many powers and counter-powers
that govern us , and from empirical moral we can infer that
capitalism is constrained also by the fact that you have to
know how to "convince" people to not get into intolerable violence
inside the society, so if for example you base your ideology only on
economic profit, i think this is not acceptable for the people, so
democracy will "constrain" capitalism to be more "reasonable", and we
have to enforce morality with efficient laws, but morality is not
something easy , because morality is not just a priori pure moral,
morality is infered also from empirical moral that is also from powers
and counter-powers, but we are more lucky today because empirical moral
is not so bad, because i have said that: Past was the past, but today it
is different, we are getting more quality and more world stability from
also the powers and counter-powers, so we not just have governance
and/or democracy that is also the power of people, but also we have the
counter-power of the financial and banks institutions that have there
rating methodology that take into account the Political Risk factor and
the economic conditions, and we have the counter-power of the consumers
confidence index that we have to higher locally and internationally,
and we are aware also that like Fordism we have to not neglect to give
the necessary wages to people around the world to be able for them to
buy our products and services, and all this create more quality and more
world stability because we have to optimize our economic systems and by
being responsable by being also responsable governance.

What is archaism in politics ?

We have to get into political philosophy, what is that we call
archaism in politics? i think that we have to be smart, we have
to follow politics throughout history, before, in the past, the
government that was doing politics was just a dictatorship of a King
or a Sultan or something like that, but the problem with this "model" of
dictatorship is that it is too rigid and too archaic and inefficient
today , because efficiency dictates also to "decentralize"
the governement, it is like an operating system that is more
decentralized like Windows NT that was efficient, but OS/2 of IBM was
too "monolithic", thus i think that the essence of "democracy" has
brought a kind of efficiency of decentralization,
the governement is not only Donald Trump , but it is the secret services
and it is the Congress and it is also science and it's people etc. so
the very essence of democracy is knowing how to balance those
decentralized powers by being efficient, this is what lacks dictatorship.

About nazism and neo-nazism

Here comes again an interesting subject..

We have to think neo-nazism from the view point of efficient morality
that is performance and reliability.

So i will start my logical proof:

As i have said that the essence of civilization is:

The act of maximizing the benefits or the advantages by optimization

This is part of the set of "morality".

But neo-nazism is not understanding correctly the essence of our
"civilization"

neo-nazism is saying for example that arabs are not as "beautiful" as
white europeans and it starts to hate arabs and wants to forbid arab
immigrants, but this is "inferior" thinking , because the reference of
measure is "morality" that is performance and reliability, but this
reference knows that our world is not an "ideal" "world", this is the
main point, we have to be "pragmatic", so we have to "balance" correctly
the advantages and the disadvantages, so our civilization
is saying the "usefulness" or "utility" is important,
so our civilization is bringing arab immigrants because
of there "usefulness" for different jobs and or/and for low birth rate
even though arabs are not as "beautiful" as white europeans, so we have
to escape the inferior conception that wants to forbid arab immigrants,
because today optimization does know better about low birth rate of
white europeans and does know that arab immigrants are also "useful" to
jobs and to low birth rate etc. and they are taking also into
account security.

Here is my new thoughts of today about philosophy..

What i am doing is finding the essence of things like in philosophy
and i am using the tool of logic that permits also to "measure"
and to "calculate" precisely like in mathematics and it permits to
reason better, so what is my new thoughts of today ? as you have noticed
i have defined previously what is morality, it is like finding its
"essence" that i have done in my previous post, now an important
question is inferred from this act of thinking, is that what is
the essence of our "civilization" ? finding its essence with more
"precise" thinking is an act of "philosophy", so what is its essence ?
i think its essence is coming from the fact that a process or a thing
can have an advantage and a disadvantage, and the general "reference" is
morality that is, by more expressiveness, "performance" and
"reliability", or simply "reliability" that can model morality correctly
as i have proved it in my previous post, so the essence of our
civilization is the act of coordinating and organizing those advantages
and disadvantages on each of us or on each thing or in each process to
be capable of giving an efficient morality that has as an essence
"performance" and "reliability", and as a validation of my model, you
will notice that we are decentralizing "governance", and each of the
decentralized parts of the governance are grouping the "advantages" and
trying to minimize the disadvantages of each of us that do the
governance , democracy is also the same , because democracy is a system
that wants to escape a "local" maximum towards a global maximum
like in artificial intelligence, and democracy is doing it by
applying itself to selecting the best among the actors of
politics etc. to govern us, this is the essence of civilization,
is the act of maximizing the benefits or the advantages by optimization,
as i have just explained to you, so hope you are understanding
my new thoughts of today. And about what is the essence of morality,
here is again my own post that speaks about it ( i have corrected few
typos in it):

What is it to be morality ?

This is the most important part of our humanity !

I have proved before that performance is inherent to morality,
and i have showed also that my definition, and that i have
proved, that morality is reliability does show that it ressembles
serious computer programming, and to be more expressiveness you see that
performance is inherent to reliability , so reliability
does model efficiently, and we are feeling it like serious
computer programming, because when you define morality
like this by "precise" words , you begin to feel our
essence and you begin to feel the essence of our humanity !
and you become aware that morality is also being capable
and being capable to comprehend ! because this makes us
distinguish the essence of morality ! so you have to not be fooled
by inferior thinking ! because morality is reliability and
reliability is performance too and the application of morality
is part of morality , so the case is closed that morality
of today must be also scientific disciplines and technical disciplines
and morality is the measure of morality that must be reliability
and performance in itself ! this is what is amazing ! you have
to feel it like this and be responsable about it.

Read the rest:

From where can we infer that "performance" is inherent to morality ?

Philosophically we can say that the essence of organization is: we are
organizing because of our weaknesses to transcend our weaknesses, so
from this we can feel the essence of our humanity and we can feel our
essence , because the essence of humanity that is perfection and
strongness is dictated by survival too ! and is dictated by the fact
that we must transcend our living conditions towards a better world ! so
this is part of morality, so then we can say that performance is
inherent to morality.

So my way of thinking and proving shows better what must be the
conception of our organization as a society, it must also be based on
"performance".

I wrote previously this:

Is performance inherent to morality ?

This is good philosophical question !

This is why you have seen me modeling efficient morality
by only one word, by saying and proving that: efficient morality
or morality is: Reliability.

Or by more expressiveness by saying that:

Efficient morality or morality is: Performance and reliability.

So this definition that i have proved shows clearly
that performance is "inherent" to morality or efficient morality.

So my way of thinking and proving shows better what must be the
conception of our organization as a society, it must also be based on
"performance".

Please read the rest of my post to understand better:

What is the essence of reliability?

Can we model efficient morality without it as being also "performance" ?

This is a good philosophical question !

I think the right definition of "reliability" is that of not being "bad".

So not being efficient is also being not being good, so reliability
can model efficiency, that means performance too.

This why also we can define efficient morality by only one word that is:

RELIABILITY.


Please read all the following to understand better my thoughts:

About Wise egoism

I have showed that the essence of tolerance is:

The essence of tolerance is consciousness of our weaknesses !
and it is an act that is caused by consciousness of our weaknesses
or by our weaknesses.

So wise egoism dictates to be a "usefulness" or a "utility" to the other
because of the essence of tolerance, so this is why we have to be more
useful to sell our products or services to others internationally
and locally, and this usefulness give rise to consumer confidence index
that constrain egoism to be more "tolerance" and more "respect" towards
others and constrain it to share more with others.


About tolerance..

What is it the essence of tolerance ?

Does it has an essence ?

It is this what we call philosophy..

When you become more smart you will find the shortest path to the
solution..

So i will answer it like this:

The essence of tolerance is consciousness of our weaknesses !
and it is an act that is caused by consciousness of our weaknesses
or by our weaknesses.

Its essence is the same as the essence of "organization" !

We are organizing because of our weaknesses too !

because if we were Gods, the need of organizing as a group will be
"much" lesser !

This is the essence of our humanity that is perfection and strongness,
and perfection and strongness is also saying that efficient morality
is performance and reliability. It is like serious computer programming,
you can also model efficient morality with only one word that is:
"reliability", but to be more "expressive", i have said that efficient
morality is performance and reliability, and you are feeling it
when you become a more serious programmer like me.

So what is the essence of efficiency?

Efficiency is part of optimization, efficiency is: you have the
ressources that is our universe(we are part of the universe) and our
other universes, and you have to produce an output from this input that
is our universe or universes that is performant, it is performance.

But what is the essence of reliability?

Reliability is the quality of performing consistently well.

Does efficiency model correctly portability in software programming ?

I think yes because we are this portability because portability is
performance of portability that is to be able to run your software
in different hardwares or operating systems, and that's i think also
performance.

And does efficiency or reliability model correctly usability?

I think yes.

Does "reliability" model correctly beautifulness ?

I think more beautifulness can mean a "good" thing, and if
it is a good thing , it is not a bug of saying it is a bad thing
, so reliability do model beautifulness correctly.

And we can generalize and say:

Because morality is all about what is bad and what is good, so
what is bad is like a bug that causes the system to be bad, so
if it is bad, it is like a bug that makes the system not "reliable",
and it is related to reliability.

This is why i have modeled efficient morality with two words by saying:

Efficient morality is performance and reliability, and it is
like finding the essence of morality.

I said above that:

The essence of tolerance is consciousness of our weaknessess !

So the essence of tolerance is related to security, so it is
related to reliablity, so "reliability" does model tolerance too.