SAVE MONEY ON FUEL
salawan@singnet
Go to link: > http://www.runyourcarwithwater.com/#sale
Polar Bear
wrote:
>TRY THIS OUT SEE FOR YOURSELF
>
>Go to link: > http://www.runyourcarwithwater.com/#sale
and what energy you use to turn water into HHO?
Good soldier
They don;t show it on the web page but for the money you also get a
very tiny magic wand that is used disassemble the water molecules...
Cheers,
schweik
(Correct Address is goodsoldierschweikatgmaildotcom)
Tchiowa
> On Fri, 16 May 2008 02:12:09 +0800, "salawan@singnet" <sala...@singnet.com.sg>
> wrote:
>
> >TRY THIS OUT SEE FOR YOURSELF
>
> >Go to link: >http://www.runyourcarwithwater.com/#sale
>
> and what energy you use to turn water into HHO?
For a very short period of time the environmental left was in love
with the concept of the hydrogen powered car (hydrogen fuel cells).
They even advertized about the waste from the hydrogen car being water
which was turned back into hydrogen and reused. Right up until someone
pointed out the basic laws of thermodynamics and the fact that it
takes more energy to break the hydrogen out of water than is created
when it is burned back into water.
The final straw came when an economic source of hyrdogen was
identified. It is *easy* (energy-wise) to get hydrogen out of natural
gas or crude oil so that would make it an energy efficient car. As
soon as the environmental left learned that their H2O car wouldn't put
the oil companies out of business they dropped the concept like a hot
potato.
LarbGai
> For a very short period of time the environmental left was in love
> with the concept of the hydrogen powered car (hydrogen fuel cells).
> They even advertized about the waste from the hydrogen car being water
> which was turned back into hydrogen and reused. Right up until someone
> pointed out the basic laws of thermodynamics and the fact that it
> takes more energy to break the hydrogen out of water than is created
> when it is burned back into water.
>
> The final straw came when an economic source of hyrdogen was
> identified. It is *easy* (energy-wise) to get hydrogen out of natural
> gas or crude oil so that would make it an energy efficient car. As
> soon as the environmental left learned that their H2O car wouldn't put
> the oil companies out of business they dropped the concept like a hot
> potato.
***** Nice bit of company propaganda Titchy.
mohor-yan
on fuel really. The trick is you must add some catalyst into the water like
sodium hydroxide and it need only a few miliampere to produce hydrogen on
demand. When water is cracked in this way, HOH or brown gas is produced and
this is where it introduced into the intake manifold of the engine. The gas
is made to pass over a mist eliminator to remove mist droplets of up to 10
micron. Humidified gas also help to reduce carbon soot and clean the
combustion chambers. It is possible to put larger electrolyzers and generate
enough HOH to power the car without the use of fuel. You will know only if
you try it.
"Tchiowa" <tchi...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:b3c4c4b6-e4d4-44fa...@y18g2000pre.googlegroups.com...
mohor-yan
on fuel really. The trick is you must add some catalyst into the water like
sodium hydroxide and it need only a few miliampere to produce hydrogen on
demand. When water is cracked in this way, HOH or brown gas is produced and
this is where it introduced into the intake manifold of the engine. The gas
is made to pass over a mist eliminator to remove mist droplets of up to 10
micron. Humidified gas also help to reduce carbon soot and clean the
combustion chambers. It is possible to put larger electrolyzers and generate
enough HOH to power the car without the use of fuel. You will know only if
you try it.
"Tchiowa" <tchi...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:b3c4c4b6-e4d4-44fa...@y18g2000pre.googlegroups.com...
Good soldier
wrote:
>You are wrong friend. Just tried this out on my car and it works. 50% saving
>on fuel really. The trick is you must add some catalyst into the water like
>sodium hydroxide and it need only a few miliampere to produce hydrogen on
>demand. When water is cracked in this way, HOH or brown gas is produced and
>this is where it introduced into the intake manifold of the engine. The gas
>is made to pass over a mist eliminator to remove mist droplets of up to 10
>micron. Humidified gas also help to reduce carbon soot and clean the
>combustion chambers. It is possible to put larger electrolyzers and generate
>enough HOH to power the car without the use of fuel. You will know only if
>you try it.
Apparently you have discovered perpetual motion - at least you seem to
be claiming that you get more energy out then you are putting in.
Certainly if you are talking about miliamps of current at 12 volts DC
you are talking about insignificant amounts of electricity to operate
the system..
How about a better description of the system and all the requirements
and how it works in detail.
>
>"Tchiowa" <tchi...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:b3c4c4b6-e4d4-44fa...@y18g2000pre.googlegroups.com...
>On May 16, 7:29 am, b...@b.com (Polar Bear) wrote:
>> On Fri, 16 May 2008 02:12:09 +0800, "salawan@singnet"
>> <sala...@singnet.com.sg>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >TRY THIS OUT SEE FOR YOURSELF
>>
>> >Go to link: >http://www.runyourcarwithwater.com/#sale
>>
>> and what energy you use to turn water into HHO?
>
>For a very short period of time the environmental left was in love
>with the concept of the hydrogen powered car (hydrogen fuel cells).
>They even advertized about the waste from the hydrogen car being water
>which was turned back into hydrogen and reused. Right up until someone
>pointed out the basic laws of thermodynamics and the fact that it
>takes more energy to break the hydrogen out of water than is created
>when it is burned back into water.
>
>The final straw came when an economic source of hyrdogen was
>identified. It is *easy* (energy-wise) to get hydrogen out of natural
>gas or crude oil so that would make it an energy efficient car. As
>soon as the environmental left learned that their H2O car wouldn't put
>the oil companies out of business they dropped the concept like a hot
>potato.
>
Cheers,
spider
news:5rmt24dgfg1vho1t1...@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 16 May 2008 23:44:54 +0800, "mohor-yan" <y...@mohoryan.net>
> wrote:
>
>>You are wrong friend. Just tried this out on my car and it works. 50%
>>saving
>>on fuel really. The trick is you must add some catalyst into the water
>>like
>>sodium hydroxide and it need only a few miliampere to produce hydrogen on
>>demand. When water is cracked in this way, HOH or brown gas is produced
>>and
>>this is where it introduced into the intake manifold of the engine. The
>>gas
>>is made to pass over a mist eliminator to remove mist droplets of up to 10
>>micron. Humidified gas also help to reduce carbon soot and clean the
>>combustion chambers. It is possible to put larger electrolyzers and
>>generate
>>enough HOH to power the car without the use of fuel. You will know only if
>>you try it.
>
> Apparently you have discovered perpetual motion - at least you seem to
> be claiming that you get more energy out then you are putting in.
>
> Certainly if you are talking about miliamps of current at 12 volts DC
> you are talking about insignificant amounts of electricity to operate
> the system..
>
> How about a better description of the system and all the requirements
> and how it works in detail.
This is only in THEORY lah. If you follow the procedure, your car will not
start, and it is going to cost you quite a bit to bring it back to normal.