Singapore's May Day

[RichAsianKid]

No less from American patriots:

http://tinyurl.com/bws5oxr

If Singapore can do it, shouldn't NorthEast Asia?

[emperor Xi Jin Ping , a billionaire and the HEAD of Chinese Mafia MONOPOLY CPC POWER in CHINA]

if Malays say Malaysia for Malays ONLY


what will happen to our 9 million CHINESE who
are claiming Malaysia for our CHINESE people ?



remember
GREAT CHINK LEE KUAN YEW in Singapore
claims
that all the 9 million CHINESE in Malaysia
are the 9 million CHINESE Co - Owners of Malaysia .

[RichAsianKid]

On 02/05/2013 10:49 PM, emperor Xi Jin Ping , a billionaire and the HEAD

of Chinese Mafia MONOPOLY CPC POWER in CHINA wrote:
> if Malays say Malaysia for Malays ONLY
>
>
> what will happen to our 9 million CHINESE who
> are claiming Malaysia for our CHINESE people ?
>
>
>
> remember
> GREAT CHINK LEE KUAN YEW in Singapore
> claims
> that all the 9 million CHINESE in Malaysia
> are the 9 million CHINESE Co - Owners of Malaysia .
>
>

I think an analogous question may be posed: What if the founding stock,
i.e. not just whites but _white Christians_ were to claim that America
is a first, foremost, and ultimately a white Christian nation and not
some de facto Jewish nation (e.g. attributed to Sharon, 2001, after
9/11)? What will happen to the Jews in America....vis-a-vis in Israel
where universalism is not exactly looked favorably upon?

Maybe, just maybe, Singapore should follow not the American model, it
should follow the Israeli model?

[rst0]

On May 3, 10:53 pm, RichAsianKid <RichAsian...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On 02/05/2013 10:49 PM, emperor Xi Jin Ping , a billionaire and the HEAD
> of Chinese Mafia MONOPOLY CPC POWER in CHINA wrote:
>
> > if  Malays  say   Malaysia   for  Malays  ONLY
>
> > what  will happen to our   9  million  CHINESE who
> > are  claiming  Malaysia  for our  CHINESE  people  ?
>
> > remember
> > GREAT CHINK   LEE  KUAN  YEW   in  Singapore
> > claims
> > that   all    the 9  million   CHINESE   in  Malaysia
> > are  the    9 million   CHINESE  Co -  Owners  of  Malaysia  .
>
> I think an analogous question may be posed: What if the founding stock,
> i.e. not just whites but _white Christians_ were to claim that America
> is a first, foremost, and ultimately a white Christian nation and not
> some de facto Jewish nation (e.g. attributed to Sharon, 2001, after
> 9/11)? What will happen to the Jews in America....vis-a-vis in Israel
> where universalism is not exactly looked favorably upon?
>
> Maybe, just maybe, Singapore should follow not the American model, it
> should follow the Israeli model?

The Israeli model can not sustain itself.
Israel makes enemies of all her neighbors.
One of these days, the table will turn.

[RichAsianKid]

On 03/05/2013 12:01 PM, Zanzibar wrote:

> Mass immigration of workers and expatriates from one country to
> another that began in the early 80s was caused
> by the Americans whose jobs were taken away and shipped to overseas.
> This started their clamours to take back their jobs from their
> overseas relocations.
>
> So this article clearly explains on why everyone in their own country
> is naturally objecting to the mass immigration
> imported from other countries, and yet they still want to advocate
> going to those shipped locations to get back their
> jobs and still make more money than they were before.
>
> This was because their overseas plants will offer them even more pay
> with overseas allowances to boot than what
> they cannot earn if they were to stay on in their own home in their
> own country or to remain jobless in their own country.
>
> These shipped compnaies will bargain for "trade-offs" wit the host
> ocuntry wwhereby they will demand that if they
> set up a company with an X amount of investments with a set of
> revenues hhat they will ask for their key staff to
> be largely from their company instead.
>
> This is regardless if their key staff is truely unreplaceable or not
> by local people of the same or even higher
> competences than them.
>
> They can fake up their claims of demands that their staff are more
> skills and talented when they really are of the same quality like
> administrative director, manager, or secretary or a buyer or even a
> vice president or top executive in the company.
>
> This problem of mass immgration of workers or executives of
> expatriates have been a strategy of these American
> firms to get jobs for their own people in overseas operations.
>
> Mass immigration can be stopped if all the countries in the world can
> gather themselves together to address on
> non- mass immgrations of workers and expatriates to or from other
> coutnries.
>
> Unfortunately, US and Britain and other EU countries are not countries
> that will correspond their employment of
> people from other countries. They set rules that is not easy for
> anyone ot work there.
>
> For example, in the US, overseas students graduated fro mtheri
> unviersities are not allowed to work there. Foreign talents of
> experience
> from other countries are not easy to enter freely into their country
> to find a job there without having a prior approval
> of H1A employment pass that approved to the employer.
>
> Employer there has to advertise many times to show proof of not having
> the right persons for their jobs and not for their reduced salary
> offered to the overseas candidates.
>
> In turn, in Singapore, everyone from overseas can enter and find their
> jobs there. The emplyers can even take waway their local jbos anfd
> gave them to the overseas who are cheaper to hire them.
>
> The people in Singapore are being screwed left and right by their
> government instead with influx of foreigners to subjucate them and to
> subdue their pay and even to replace of them quickly.
>

Those are very reasonable claims, and I think in contrast to Canadian or
Australian immigration policies, the US policy is often one of
short-sightedness if not downright idiocy. It in effect selects not just
for the proletariat but the bottom of the barrel - "the path of least
resistance to work and citizenship is to stay illegally" as Americans
effectively quip - perhaps there's an under-element of macho noble
salvation complex built in; and while all are for $ for sure many many
more countries that need way more $ than America will not even begin to
let you in.

And the point of the post goes deeper than wicked greedy capitalists:
the contrast is that of Singapore vs American _people_ (note that May
Day is pun)- those Singaporean troopers marching on the streets are not
Maserati-driving company executives afterall. Yet in America it's the
May celebration of illegals getting rights of citizenship and let's now
all altogether now sing kumbaya - perhaps coinciding with Cinco de Mayo.
One is a healthy demonstration of a people against foreigners; the other
is a paralyzed people helpless against onslaught. Once again, one's a
healthy 21st society with a healthy infrastructure that functions for
its people, versus a 21st society that effectively self-liquidates for
its future generations if not for its people now.

[Zanzibar]

Singapore uses immigrants from low end countries and issues them work
passes with tenures for levels and grades
to undermine its own people of Singaporeans from their jobs of employs
so that they can be displaced them or
retrenched them to enable employers to get ready alternative
replacement sources of cheap or cheapest salaried
labour cost from third world countries.

Whereas, America uses mainly of their own labour from Americans to run
and employ in their jobs and they keep
up their salary that keeps up to their cost of living.

Americans deliberately refused to grant their immgrants from any
legality of employ to forestall them from encroachign their high jobs.
Americans keep them in their employs with a a yellow card on their
hands not to bite when they are in employ with them.

So American have a subtle meaning in aking use of their illegal
employs of immigrants as also their legal employ
of illegal immigrants. By not giving them legal status of their entry
to America and not giving them a work pass or
visa to work in America, it was like telling them they are to live and
die on their own without care from their employers
or government.

Perhaps this makes it also easy for Americans to exploit them and make
use of them to do illegal things such as
smugglings of things, and selling of illegal stuffs, etc. They also
can pay them cheaply without union or health
insurance, knowing that they have no recourse to blame them even their
ay is not consistent with market pay for
legal Americans.

They also can make use of their vulnerability of being their illegals
in not giving them adequate of health needs and
care and their freedoms to seek promotions of jobs and pays and to
their choices of choosing their work and their
making of free speeches.

If America do think this outcome was not the case of intention of not
giving them legal status of their illegal entry
in America, then they should have deported them and sent them home to
their own countries or of their choosings
and not let them stayed on in America for so many years.

It was likely forever playing them of their fears and hide and seeks
played from the authorities. If they gave them
renewal work passes with different tenures of works and stays for
them, there is at least certainty for them to know
where they stands in their status of employment or immigrant in
Ameria.

If these illegal immigrants are gvien a deifned tenures on their work
passes or permanent work residency in
America, they can have a chance to go back to visit their home
countries with a proper wwrok pass and updated
passports from home country when they have off-days or vacation to go
home to see their loved ones.

[Satish]

Does the Chinese Communist party (CCP) dictatorship in Beijing know
that? Why is it alienating every neighbor in the neighborhood?

Beijing's lust for raw materials has fueled its colonial agenda. In
this, it is behaving exactly as the Tojo regime had during the WW II
era.


The Pacific nations are all aware that imperialist China has come to
believe like rst0 that "Today, it's all about military power, the only
thing counts."


In 1979, the CCP dictatorship under Deng Xiaoping's helmsmanship
caused the death of nearly 150,000 human soldiers just to "teach
Vietnam a lesson". It is another matter that a significant proportion
of the dead were Chinese soldiers. But that mattered very little to
lull the blood-lust of the CCP dictatorship in Beijing.


In fact, China's small neighbors thank USA for the fact that China
hasn't dared since 1979 to launch a bloody invasion to teach any of
its small neighbors a lesson.

As far as the Pacific nations are concerned, it is the USA that is
providing a shield against the blood lust of the CCP dictatorship.


As far as the Pacific countries (Japan, Korea, Taiwan, the
Philippines, Vietnam, Brunei, Malaysia, Indonesia, Australia, New
Zealand etc.) are concerned, it is the CCP dictatorship in Beijing
that is the greatest menace to world peace. They have seen with
concern how the CCP dictatorship had laid claims to islands on the
offshore of other countries (and much farther from coast of Mainland
China) solely for the purpose of being able to claim the entire waters
of seas like the South China Sea as PRC's territorial waters and to
exploit its natural resources.

Repeated appeals to PRC for international arbitration in accordance
with international laws and treaties on seas are falling on the deaf
ears of the CCP dictatorship in Beijing.

The Munich agreement gave in to Nazi regime's demand for Sudetenland.
But this only whetted the Nazi regime's addiction to aggrandizement.
The Nazi regime went on to lay claims on Austria and then to Poland
and then to Russia and France and then to the whole world.


The Beijing bandit regime's imperialist agenda is expanding
exponentially. Now it is disputing Japan's sovereignty over Okinawa on
the basis of Okinawa's tributary relationship with China some 500
years ago. The CCP dictatorship in Beijing is becoming as much a
menace to world peace as the Tojo regime and the Hitler regime were in
their days:

*******************



http://english.pravda.ru/world/asia/17-07-2012/121658-china_territorial_claims-0/

China has territorial claims to nearly 20 countries

17.07.2012

Chinese leader Mao Zedong not only built a strong country but also
outlined a global goal: "We must conquer the globe where we will
create a powerful state." Today, China has territorial claims to all
its neighbors. Naturally, the U.S. is dreaming of becoming a mediator
in resolving disputes in the region. But it seems that Beijing
absolutely does not care about their opinion.

Burma, Laos, Northern India, Vietnam, Nepal, Bhutan, Thailand,
Malaysia, Singapore, the Ryukyu Islands, 300 islands of the South
China, East China and Yellow Seas, as well as Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia,
Taiwan, South Kazakhstan, the Afghan province of Bahdashan,
Transbaikalia and the Far East to South Okhotsk - here is the complete
list of areas that, according to Zedong, were lost due to the fall of
the Qing empire. All of these countries and regions combined exceed
the territory of modern China. Not all complaints are voiced by the
Government of China in the international arena, but within the country
the imperialist ambitions have not been lost, but rather, are actively
promoted.

The PRC authorities talk out loud only about the areas that, at least
theoretically, can be taken away from Japan and Korea. Tokyo is
regularly frustrated not only because of the travel of the Russian
leaders to the Kuril Islands, but also about the Chinese ships freely
entering the disputed Senkaku Islands waters. Beijing believes that
the Islands are called Diaoyu, and they belonged to China, but the
malicious Japanese tricked the U.S. into giving them to Japan because
after World War II the uninhabited archipelago was in the US
jurisdiction.

Significant reserves of natural gas were found on the islands. For the
growing industry of China and stagnant Japan it is more than a serious
argument in favor of the struggle for the archipelago, no matter what
it is called. Not to mention the fish that is found there in large
quantities. To date, the only agreement the parties have reached in
the negotiations is on the joint development of oil fields. In
addition, if the Japanese behave more or less decently, the Chinese
are regularly caught for illegal fishing in the area.

Any territorial dispute, but rather, its resolution, is a serious
precedent. If China's claim in respect of at least one territory from
the list of the "lost" is satisfied, the Chinese machine would be
unstoppable. Despite the fact that the Chinese are very pleased to
partner with Russia and have always supported Russia in the UN
Security Council, in person, on the sidelines, its diplomats
supposedly jokingly hint to their Russian colleagues: you must
understand that soon you will have to share the Far East? China has
more than a billion people, while Russia's vast territory barely has
150 million.

These dangerous trends - demographic, and as a result, geopolitical -
must sound scary to the Russian government, but so far it seems that
it is happy with the fact that Beijing makes territorial claims only
to Seoul and Tokyo. In 2005 Russia had already given China a bounty in
the form of 337 square kilometers of land in the area of Big Island
(upper Argun River in the Chita region) and two sites in the vicinity
of the islands Tarabarov and Big Ussuri near the confluence of the
Amur and Ussuri.

However, none of the leaders of the military departments of ASEAN that
includes all debating countries agree to recognize, for example, the
fact that Diaoyu belongs to Japan. Instead, the defense ministers of
Vietnam, Indonesia, Australia, Thailand and Singapore urged the
Japanese authorities to proceed with caution and within the framework
of the international law. These countries certainly do not need a
resolution to the dispute because in that case their territory will be
separated from China only by perseverance of the latter.

They are silent about the "Iodo island" (the Chinese version is
Suenchzhao. - Ed) in the East China Sea. The sneaky Chinese took the
principle of dividing the Arctic as an example and now claim that the
underwater ridge of this tiny piece of land is under close control of
the Chinese. Since the Iodo is closer to Korea, in 2003 the Koreans
built an uninhabitable marine research station there. From the
standpoint of the international law, this rock in general should not
be the subject of a debate.

In any case, the controversy continues, Japan and South Korea remain
to be supported by their all-time ally - the United States. For the
US, the unification of Southeast Asian Nations is a chance to save
their own economy, because in that case the World Trade Center will
move there, where currently there are no transnational corporations in
the amount sufficient for the U.S.

The success of the White House in the region does not depend on the
strength that America loves to show any chance it has, but rather,
diplomacy, as the countries of ASEAN and Asia-Pacific region do not
trust each other or anyone outside the regional boundaries. However,
Washington is trusted here because of the support of Seoul and Tokyo.
However, China has already pushed Japan out of the ranks of the
largest economies in the world, and the structure of the region is no
longer formed on spatial basis.

Therefore, territorial claims of China, and not Russia, India or, for
example, Australia are so important for Washington. Beijing is the
only capital of the world, ready to use force in the struggle for the
sake of expansion. During the last ten years, while America was
blowing up its financial bubble, China has not only developed the
industry, but also equipped its area of interest with military
equipment. China has placed 38 new diesel and nuclear submarines in
the region, purchased four destroyers of class "Modern" from Russia
and built another dozen on its own, and has launched a network of
ground-based ballistic missiles to destroy naval targets.

Only one other country has done this before - the Soviet Union during
the "Cold War". It is no wonder that the Americans are very concerned
with the regular quarrels between China and its major allies.
Construction of a naval base on Hainan Island does not add confidence
to the U.S. The proximity to the Malacca Strait poses a threat to the
smooth supply of Washington's main allies in the region - Japan, South
Korea and Taiwan - this is the way the US sees the situation. The
American senators have already decided that such behavior is a threat
to Beijing's regional peace and stability, economic development and
even "food security". The international community is well aware what
usually follows such wording.

Ilona Raskolnikova

Pravda.Ru

*******************

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/oct/26/inside-china-436801701/?page=all#pagebreak


Threat against ‘little countries’
By Miles Yu
mmil...@gmail.com


China’s official communist newspaper, the Global Times, published a
chilling editorial warning several “little countries” that are
disputing China’s maritime claims in the South China Sea, notably the
Philippines and Vietnam, to “get ready to hear the sound of gunfire.”


Headlined “China Cannot Resort Only to Negotiations Over Maritime
Conflicts, We Must Kill One to Deter One Hundred If Necessary,” the
editorial published Tuesday asked, in a tone of condescension, where
these “little neighboring countries” got the nerve to challenge China.
It called such challenges an “opportunistic strategic offensive
launched by little countries against a big country.”


The newspaper further threatened that the game these countries play
against China would not be easy to win because “China possesses the
force to end such game anytime.”


The report said any fear of a naval war is unnecessary because the
Chinese public had been psychologically getting used to such a naval
conflagration in recent years.


According to the newspaper, the root cause of China’s trouble with
these “little countries” is the United States. “At present various
disputants behave with imperial swagger [against China],” the
commentary said, “as if with the support from the United States, they
all had the force and capabilities to subjugate China.”


The newspaper used the phrase “bodies of waters in East Asia” to
include areas other than the South China Sea where China has
territorial disputes — a clear reference to South Korea and Japan.


Since April 2010, China began deliberately sending regular fishing
fleets accompanied by official government escort ships to disputed
areas of the Spratly’s Island, Senkaku islands, the Korean littoral
area and other murky waters.


These China fishing and escort ships routinely clash with other
nations’ naval patrol ships, including incidents with the Philippine
navy, the South Korean navy and the Japanese coastal patrol vessels
just within the past week, dramatically escalating tensions with
several “little countries.”


Underground Great Wall


The U.S. government this week announced that it had dismantled and
destroyed the last and the largest Cold War-era nuclear weapon, the
B53 gravity bomb, in Amarillo, Texas.


Meanwhile, China is increasing its stockpile of nuclear weapons under
the rubric of a mammoth project called the Underground Great Wall that
includes a 3,000-mile-long subterranean tunnel system used to store
and operate the many thousands of China’s nuclear-carrying missiles.
The system is under the direct supervision of China’s strategic
missile forces known as the Second Artillery Corps.


First reported by the Chinese state television in March 2008 and
confirmed by the Chinese military a year later, the Underground Great
Wall runs several hundred feet below the ground, said James Holmes of
the U.S. Naval War College.


Mr. Holmes wrote in the Japanese-based electronic journal the Diplomat
in August that “the very scale of the underground network opens up new
vistas for Chinese nuclear strategy.”


On Tuesday, the Wall Street Journal quoted former Pentagon nuclear
weapons specialist Philip Karber as fundamentally challenging the
West’s conventional assumption about the size of China’s nuclear
stockpile, officially estimated to include several hundred warheads.


Mr. Karber said gauging the size of China’s nuclear arsenal is
difficult, but the Wall Street Journal article urged an immediate
reconsideration of the underestimated arsenal because “the alternative
is for China, steeped in a 2,500 year military tradition of
concealment, deception and surprise, to announce — at a time and in a
manner of its choosing — its supremacy in a field that we have
foolishly abandoned to our dreams.”


Anti-terrorism law proposed


China announced Monday that it would enact a sweeping law to combat
what the communist state would define as “terrorists” or “terrorist
acts.” These acts include creating public disorder and social panic,
causing public property damage and threatening government agencies.
The law would target international organizations and all others that
abet and finance such “terrorists” and “terrorist acts.”


Human rights activists and thousands of netizens immediately reacted
with anger and protest. Li Tiantian, a Shanghai-based human rights
lawyer, was quoted by overseas Chinese news media as saying: “This law
aims to protect the power structure of the state, to guarantee the
security, stability and power of the government. It is the same as
calling all actions jeopardizing the regime’s rule terrorism,
deserving suppression.”

*************


http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/influential-chinese-commentators-dispute-japans-claim-to-okinawa/2012/07/23/gJQAQPka4W_story.html

Washington Post
Monday, July 23, 2012

Japan’s claim to Okinawa disputed by influential Chinese commentators
By Kathrin Hille and Mure Dickie, Updated: Monday, July 23, 9:29 AM

BEIJING — For many observers, rising friction between China and Japan
over a group of remote and uninhabited islands in the East China Sea
is worrying enough.

But if some influential Chinese nationalist commentators have their
way, the spat over the Japanese-controlled Senkaku islands — which
Beijing calls the Diaoyu — could widen into a dispute over a much more
important archipelago.

The CCP-dictatorship in Beijing is getting intoxicated with its
imperialist agenda. It is now seriously thinking of disputing Japanese
Okinawa on the specious plea that Okinawa had a tributary relationship
with Okinawa half a millennium ago.

The Beijing bandit regime is behaving the way the Hitler regime had.
Munich didn't appease Hitler. From claims on Sudetenland and Austria,
it was an easy step to claims on Poland and France and then on Russia
and then on the whole world.

In a fiery editorial this month, the Global Times newspaper urged
Beijing to consider challenging Japan’s control over its southern
prefecture of Okinawa, an island chain with a population of 1.4
million people that bristles with U.S. military bases.

“China should not be afraid of engaging with Japan in a mutual
undermining of territorial integrity,” the Communist Party-run paper
declared.

Maj. Gen. Jin Yinan, head of the strategy research institute at
China’s National Defense University, went even further. He told state-
run radio that limiting discussion to the Diaoyu was “too narrow,”
saying Beijing should question ownership of the whole Ryukyu
archipelago, which by some definitions extends beyond Okinawa.

While the Chinese government has offered no endorsement of such
radical views, their open espousal by senior commentators is likely to
be deeply unsettling both to Japan and other neighboring nations.

“Challenging Japan’s sovereignty over the Ryukyus would indeed be a
break from the past,” says Taylor Fravel, a Chinese security expert at
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, who contends that Beijing has
tended to limit its territorial claims for the sake of clearly defined
borders.

Chinese questioning of Japanese sovereignty over Okinawa is based on
the prefecture’s roots in an independent state known as the Ryukyu
Kingdom that won control of the archipelago in the 15th century.
Ryukyu kings paid formal tribute to Chinese emperors, a practice
allowing lucrative trade that continued even after the kingdom was
conquered by a Japanese feudal domain in 1609. Okinawa only officially
became part of Japan in 1879.

For some in China, this history is enough to render illegitimate
Japanese rule over a strategically important archipelago seen as the
biggest impediment to the expansion of Chinese naval power in the
Pacific.

Tang Chunfeng, a former official at the Chinese Embassy in Tokyo, is
one of those campaigning for China to rethink its acceptance of
Japanese rule over Okinawa, saying past restraint has “done a lot of
harm.”

“When I was in Japan, I didn’t even know that the Ryukyus were once
ours,” says Tang, now a Japan specialist at a Commerce Ministry think
tank.

But such arguments could be diplomatically incendiary.

“Once you start arguing that a tributary relationship at some point in
history is the basis for a sovereignty claim in the 20th century, you
start worrying a lot of people,” says June Teufel Dreyer, a China and
Japan specialist at the University of Miami. “Many, many countries had
tributary relationships with China.”

Some Chinese hawks stop short of saying Okinawa should be Chinese,
suggesting it is enough to promote the idea that the archipelago
should be independent from Japan. Such a gambit, they say, would make
clear to Tokyo the cost of denying Chinese claims to the Diaoyu/
Senkaku.

But Zhou Yongsheng, a professor at China Foreign Affairs University,
warns against such tactics.

“Using the Ryukyu sovereignty issue to resolve the Diaoyu dispute
would destroy the basis of China-Japan relations,” Zhou says. “If this
was considered, it would basically be the prelude to military action.”

Nor can Beijing expect much enthusiasm for independence among
Okinawans. While many in the prefecture are unhappy with Japanese
government policies — and with the presence of U.S. troops —
separatist sentiment is muted. A pro-independence candidate who ran
for governor in 2006 received only 6,220 votes.

Chinese questioning of Japan’s sovereignty over Okinawa would also
invite comparisons with Beijing’s policy of suppressing pro-
independence movements among its much more restive Tibetan, Mongolian
and Uighur populations.

Yasukatsu Matsushima, a professor at Ryukoku University in Kyoto, is a
strong advocate of Okinawan independence who believes Tokyo’s rule
over the islands is illegal, but he notes that at least in Japan such
views can be openly expressed.

It would be “strange” if China supported self-determination for
Okinawans but continued to deny it to its own minorities, Matsushima
says.

“We have to consider the background” to any Chinese support for
independence, he says. “We can’t allow Ryukyu independence to be used
as a tool.”

****************


9-5-2012

http://globalnation.inquirer.net/36093/china-is-testing-filipinos-determination-to-defend-against-intrusion


China is testing Filipinos’ determination to defend against intrusion
By Ted Laguatan

The Chinese dragon’s hunger for black gold relates to its continuous
growth as an economic powerhouse. China imports seventy percent of its
oil needs – supplied mostly by Russia. Fearing the prospect of
disruption of oil supplies and being hostage to the demands of
supplier countries, China is recklessly embarking on grabbing the rich
oil resources of the Philippines and it’s neighboring countries.


To justify its intrusion into the territories of neighboring
countries, the dragon has engaged in spinning a fictitious tale on why
it supposedly owns everything in the area. The fairy tale goes this
way: “About 2000 years ago, an ancient Han Dynasty map showed the
limits of Chinese territorywhich included us owning all of the
territory in the South China Sea (also known as West Philippine Sea).
Therefore, all of these areas are ours. Never mind that they were
designated by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea as
belonging to other countries.”


Does China actually have a Han Dynasty map indicating ownership of
everything in the South China Sea in this area? So far, it has not
shown this map to the public. It may be that some kind of ancient map
exists. There are hundreds of old maps. Do any of these say China owns
territory belonging to the Philippines and other countries?


While the Chinese have been coming to the Philippines since ancient
times as traders selling their stuff or as pirates like Limahong
robbing and pillaging the locals – there is no historical proof that
the Philippines was ever a colony of China or that China ruled the
Philippines or even some parts of it.


Even if we assume that such a map exists indicating a claim by some
dreaming Chinese officials that it owned Philippine territories, was
that then actual or legal ownership? Not so if in fact no such
ownership ever happened except maybe in the imagination of some
ancient Han dynasty megalomaniacs.


To illustrate the absurdity of China’s claim: Let’s say Italy found an
ancient map that shows that the Roman Empire owned most of Europe and
some parts of Africa and Asia, can the Italian government now claim
these countries and territories belong to them? Governments and
national territorial lines keep changing. That’s a reality every
nation has to live with.


The Chinese position is so ridiculous that I doubt that even the
Chinese government seriously believes that they have a legitimate
claim which can properly be defended in the United Nations
International Tribunal on the Law of the Sea (ITLOS).


China’s refusal to bring her claim to ITLOS by itself indicates an
admission of the absurdity of her position. Any fool can see that the
Chinese government is just using a convenient fairy tale to justify
her intrusion into neighbors’ territories in an attempt to grab their
oil and other resources.


Recently, Chinese fishing boats and research vessels have been
intruding deep into Philippine territory and into waters known as
Scarborough Shoals which are just off Zambales.


Pursuant to the United Nations Law of the Sea, a country owns all of
that territory within 200 miles from it’s baseline. The Scarborough
Shoals are just about 125 miles off the coast of Zambales.


The Philippines issued a diplomatic protest to China but instead of
respecting the Philippine position – the Chinese sent more fishing
boats into the area including armed patrol boats – together with a
response from China’s Deputy Foreign Minister Fu Ying that the
Scarborough Shoals are theirs and that it is the Philippines intruding
into Chinese territory. Adding the insult to the injury is like
saying: “So? What can you do to me if I slap you in the face?”


What does this aggressive Chinese position mean?


Here’s my take on this: It means that China is testing the
Philippines’ resolve and reaction to Chinese intrusion – as well as
observing American response to the situation. China is not worried
about the Philippines’ military capability. It practically has none
compared to China’s mighty naval armada and air force. But the
American military is no paper tiger. If America gets involved, China
will likely reconsider its options.


The United States has a legitimate interest in preventing China from
using bully tactics to take over the energy and marine resources of
the countries in the area. It can enter into partnerships with the
Philippines and other countries in the area for its own energy needs.
Political stability and peace in the region are also preserved with
the United States using its military might in maintaining the balance
of power and keeping the sea lanes open.


Last year, on June 11, 2011, the US Senate passed a resolution
condemning China’s increasing use of force against smaller countries
in the area and affirmed the US’ willingness to use its military might
against Chinese aggression.


For diplomatic and other reasons, the US has to announce that it
cannot take sides in the conflict between the Philippines and China.
However, American policy makers are aware that U.S. interests compel
its continued alliance and goodwill with countries in the region.
Standing by doing nothing while China gobbles up the resources of
neighboring countries sets a bad precedent and encourages China to be
bolder in carrying on more bullying military adventurisms.


It is unfortunate that the Chinese government is resorting to these
gorilla tactics to rob smaller nations of their valuable energy and
marine resources. While the global community should rightfully be
happy for the people of China who went through so much suffering
before the present prosperity – China should not pursue continuous
economic well-being at the expense of weaker nations.


What should Filipinos do against the onslaught of China’s threat and
use of military might?


It would not be prudent to confront China militarily. That would be
like David confronting Goliath without his slingshot or like a poodle
confronting a tiger. But there are other ways to fight.


Everyone knows that China’s intrusion into Philippine territory is
motivated by its thirst for oil. Any decent human being knows that it
is immoral to steal property that belongs to another especially when
the use of force is involved. It is immoral when individuals do it. It
is likewise immoral when nations do it.


What the Philippines needs to do is seek the support of other nations
and press the United Nations to seek a resolution of this trespassing
and stealing of resources issue. Alone, the Philippines is weak. But
together with other nations in condemning China’s immoral attempts at
territorial grab, the Philippines can be strong.


The world must be made aware of China’s immoral adventurism and of
her attempt to steal the patrimony of other nations through threats or
actual use of its military might. The Philippines must wage a
relentless campaign with the global community in condemning China’s
disrespect of other nations’ property rights. China must also realize
that it gains more respect and friends by respecting other nations.
In line with this important objective of defending Philippine
territory and resources, the US Pinoys for Good Governance (USP4GG)
and supporters have organized a worldwide protest against Chinese
intrusion into Philippine waters. On May 11, 2012, at 11:30 A.M.,
protest demonstrations will be held in front of different Chinese
Embassies and Consulates around the world.


Now is the time for all good Filipinos to show genuine concern for the
Philippines. Preserving the country’s energy and marine resources can
mean a brighter future for millions of Filipinos.

***********

[rst9]

He (Satish) is a pain in the ass. His hygiene is rated at zero. He is
smelly and dirty with filthy odors.

Satish is a crook, a liar, a pawn and puppy dog
and a cocaine-filled crazy raving lunatic madman.

Satish is a crazy filthy dirty ugly dark-skinned stinky Indian with
twisted warp-minded lunatic lying son-of-a-bitch at it again,
making up lies about others. He has absolutely no idea what the
hell he is talking about. He has no knowledge or understand the
meaning of “sin”.

Go rape and kill more Indian women. That is about all you dumb
asshole can do.

Satish, the filthiest dirtiest god-damnest liar and the most twisted
warp-minded lunatic son-of-a-bitch in the world.

Satish has slanted eyes, slanted brain, and
slanted twisted lunatic warped mind.
Satish has crooked buck teeth and crooked backs, and bowlegged pig-
headed skunk.
Satish can't even walk straight, let alone see straight.
Ignorant liar & fool like you, Satish, persists being ignorant fool
& liar.

[charlie vietcong , fighter for communism Tawhid]

ja good Idea





the YANKEE model

but our VC are DEAD against the US system

[rst9]

On May 5, 8:26 am, "charlie vietcong , fighter for communism

Tawhid" <vietcong.charlie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ja  good  Idea
>
> the  YANKEE  model
>
> but  our  VC    are  DEAD  against the  US  system

All nations should follow their ideas and system for themselves.

[Mussa Hassan , Chief of Police of Malaysia , Ketuanan Malayu .]

thank you rst9 ,


you wrote

all nations should follow their idea and system for
themselves .


Malays will always vote for MALAY Power in MALAYSIA , ,
this week 's election proves your point .

[RichAsianKid]

but there are not many Jews around, there are, however, way more - way
more than enough - chinese around

[Mussa Hassan , Chief of Police of Malaysia , Ketuanan Malayu .]

Chinese from China are thieves , were Chinese thieves in
SE ASIA ,
and
Chinese in S. E. ASIA will continue to steal other people
' s
native lands in SE ASIA .

Chinese are now claiming for all SOUTH CHINA SEA ,

Chinese certainly will claim all ASEAN because
Chinese in ASEAN are always trying to hide their Chinese
origin
and their own REAL Chinese identity in ASEAN .



there are over 40 million CHINESE in ASEAN who are always
claiming to be :

Thai by using Thai names , ( 9 million Chinese in Thai 'S
LAND )
Malaysians by claiming to be Co -Owners of Malaysia, ( 9
MILLION IN MALAY 'S LANDS )
Indonesians by using Hindu and Christian names , ( 10
MILLION Chinese )
Singaporeans by claiming to be New Chinese natives of
Singapore , ( 3.5 MILLION Chinese )
Burmese by using Burmese names ,( 2 .7 MILLION NEW CHINESE
migrants )
Lao by using Lao names ,
Vietnamese by using Vietnamese names ,
Filipino by using Christian names , ( 10 million Chinese
calling themselves as Filipino)
Cambodians by using Khmer names ,
Bruneians by using Muslim names

[Mao , the HEAD of the CPC , Communist Party of China , Yellow Race Power Block]

well now ,

we Chinese only want more breathing space in SE ASIA.,

with over 40 million pure Chinese in ASEAN ,

our Chinese in ASEAN shall surely have the LEGAL RIGHT to
claim ASEAN .






On May 9, 2:32 pm, "Mussa Hassan , Chief of Police of Malaysia ,

[RichAsianKid]

On 09/05/2013 3:32 AM, Mussa Hassan , Chief of Police of Malaysia ,

There's reason why China and Chinese are still shamed - they caved vs
Japan. I invite people to correct RAK. There's reason why Chinese _hate_
Japanese but not SE Asians. For the latter, as adversary, is....
unworthy. Chinese may despise them, but it's not revenge jealousy you
feel, :)

(If you look further, why are Jews hating Germans anyway? Why are Jews
not hating blacks?)

[rst9]

White Jews hate Black Jews, too.
You should pay attention to the daily newspapers.

[Wu Xer Ker , Chinese Middle East Expert in the CPC MONOPOLY POWER in CHINA]

yes

white Jews from northern Europe
hate
Black Jews from Ethiopia .

[charlie vietcong , fighter for communism Tawhid]

Chinese are just following Alfred Hugenburg 's philosophy in
Germany
with A. HITLER as the leader





On May 9, 6:06 pm, "Mao , the HEAD of the CPC , Communist
Party of China , Yellow Race Power Block"

[charlie vietcong , fighter for communism Tawhid]

you should know about Alfred Hugenburg


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Hugenburg

On May 9, 6:06 pm, "Mao , the HEAD of the CPC , Communist
Party of China , Yellow Race Power Block"
<monsteroooodk...@gmail.com> wrote:

[Wu Xer Ker , Chinese Middle East Expert in the CPC MONOPOLY POWER in CHINA]

oh yes



I remember the German Settlement Commission to buy up
all Polish lands in Poland
and to drive out all POLES out of Poland




http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prussian_Settlement_Commission



On May 10, 3:08 pm, "charlie vietcong , fighter for communism

[Wu Xer Ker , Chinese Middle East Expert in the CPC MONOPOLY POWER in CHINA]

another GERMAN prominent land grabbing expansionist
is

von Gottberg



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curt_von_Gottberg

n May 10, 3:08 pm, "charlie vietcong , fighter for communism
Tawhid" <vietcong.charlie...@gmail.com> wrote:

[Liu Pao Luong]

Who cares about you, if only you stop flooding your posts here, it would
stop.

To all posters here,
Everything here is about reciprocal of courtesy to posters here.

Remember, when writing and sending your posts here,
Courtesy begets courtesy,
Respects begets respects,

Acceptance of other views begets their acceptance of your views too.
Multiple of nick names begets back in multiplied nick names too.

Flooding of name-callings begets the same name-callings back on you.
It is up to you.




"rst9" wrote in message
news:b2d3e2ba-21da-41ff...@a16g2000pbu.googlegroups.com...

He (Satish) is a pain in the ass. His hygiene is rated at zero. He is
smelly and dirty with filthy odors.

Satish is a crook, a liar, a pawn and puppy dog
and a cocaine-filled crazy raving lunatic madman.

Satish is a crazy filthy dirty ugly dark-skinned stinky Indian with
twisted warp-minded lunatic lying son-of-a-bitch at it again,
making up lies about others. He has absolutely no idea what the
hell he is talking about. He has no knowledge or understand the

meaning of �sin�.

[RichAsianKid]

Don't forget blacks, whites, browns are different too - they're not
interchangeable nor same nor can be lifted up by the west. They' yet
somehow made same? Peoples are different, no?

[wakalukong]

[wakalukong]

"wakalukong" wrote in message
news:c6eca894-689e-463d...@wg15g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...

[RichAsianKid]

Me against my brother, me and my brother against the world. Yes it's
fundamental. I've been saying this all along. Again, not blind equality. :)

[rst0]

You're right RAT.

[rst0]

Since the beginning of Chinese civilization,
human trafficking
eating human flesh
stealing and cheating money
corruption,
bribery
petty thievery
robbery
dishonesty
...
.... and on and on...
were and are part of Chinese life.

[rst0]

In a way, people ARE interchangeable, but their background and racial
past will not allow them to be interchangeable.

When, at a point in time, humanity comes to a point of almost
extinction, then and only then will humanity becomes interchangeable.

[charlie vietcong , fighter for communism Tawhid]

Chinese are Bad people

[rst0]

"rst0" wrote in message
news:b02d90f3-66b3-4145...@ua8g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...

You're right RAT.

[rst0]

"rst0" wrote in message
news:768b35b9-885a-4898...@k8g2000pbf.googlegroups.com...

[charlie vietcong , fighter for communism Tawhid]

On May 19, 11:25 am, "charlie vietcong , fighter for communism

[rst0]

In a way, people ARE exchangeable, but their background and racial
past will allow them to be interchangeable.

When, at a point in time, humanity comes to a point of almost
extinction, then and only then will humanity becomes interchangeable.

"rst0" wrote in message
news:0efffe1d-a6fe-4f34...@n5g2000pbg.googlegroups.com...

[rst0]

In a way, people ARE interchangeable, but their background and racial
past will not allow them to be interchangeable.

When, at a point in time, humanity comes to a point of almost
extinction, then and only then will humanity becomes interchangeable.

"rst0" wrote in message
news:0efffe1d-a6fe-4f34...@n5g2000pbg.googlegroups.com...

[charlie vietcong , fighter for communism Tawhid]

Chinese are Bad people

"charlie vietcong , fighter for communism Tawhid" wrote in message
news:e6ffb183-ef5c-440e...@g5g2000pbp.googlegroups.com...

[rst0]

He (Satish) is a pain in the ass. His hygiene is rated at zero. He is
smelly and dirty with filthy odors.

Satish is a crook, a liar, a pawn and puppy dog
and a cocaine-filled crazy raving lunatic madman.

Satish is a crazy filthy dirty ugly dark-skinned stinky Indian with
twisted warp-minded lunatic lying son-of-a-bitch at it again,
making up lies about others. He has absolutely no idea what the
hell he is talking about. He has no knowledge or understand the

meaning of “sin”.

Go rape and kill more Indian women. That is about all you dumb
asshole
can do.

Satish, the filthiest dirtiest god-damnest liar and the most twisted
warp-minded lunatic son-of-a-bitch in the world.
Satish has slanted eyes, slanted brain, and
slanted twisted lunatic warped mind.
Satish has crooked buck teeth and crooked backs, and bowlegged pig-
headed skunk.
Satish can't even walk straight, let alone see straight.
Ignorant liar & fool like you, Satish, persists being ignorant fool
&
liar.

"charlie vietcong , fighter for communism Tawhid" wrote in message
news:e6ffb183-ef5c-440e...@g5g2000pbp.googlegroups.com...

[RichAsianKid]

People are interchangeable only when compared to, say, chimpanzees. Homo
Sapiens probably value each other more than monkeys. Primates value each
other more than, oh say, fish. There has to be an outgroup to
consolidate ingroup solidarity. And there's reason why Japanese can
unite China or Muslims unite America, or why the starry-eyed utopian
left are so desperate for extraterrestrial life - for, and indeed, that
would consolidate the biosphere.

But again, once again, it is _not_ (and pardon the 2 puns) universal.

[RichAsianKid]

On 19/05/2013 5:16 AM, charlie vietcong , fighter for communism Tawhid
wrote:
> Chinese are Bad people
>


As the pawnish Uighur muslims have shown in international politics, one
man's terrorist is merely another's freedom-fighter

[rst0]

On May 19, 2:08 pm, RichAsianKid <RichAsian...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On 19/05/2013 12:23 AM, rst0 wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 18, 8:43 pm, RichAsianKid <RichAsian...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> On 05/05/2013 12:35 PM, rst9 wrote:
>
> >>> On May 5, 8:26 am, "charlie  vietcong  , fighter  for   communism
> >>> Tawhid" <vietcong.charlie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> ja  good  Idea
>
> >>>> the  YANKEE  model
>
> >>>> but  our  VC    are  DEAD  against the  US  system
>
> >>> All nations should follow their ideas and system for themselves.
>
> >> Don't forget blacks, whites, browns are different too - they're not
> >> interchangeable nor same nor can be lifted up by the west. They' yet
> >> somehow made same? Peoples are different, no?
>
> > In a way, people ARE interchangeable, but their background and racial
> > past will not allow them to be interchangeable.
>
> > When, at a point in time, humanity comes to a point of almost
> > extinction, then and only then will humanity becomes interchangeable.
>
> People are interchangeable only when compared to, say, chimpanzees.

Hummm!!! Interesting thought!!! I wonder if anyone try to mix human
with a chimanzee!!!!
Would that create a "chimphuman" or a "humanpanzee"????

[rst0]

On May 19, 2:09 pm, RichAsianKid <RichAsian...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On 19/05/2013 5:16 AM, charlie vietcong , fighter for communism Tawhid
> wrote:
>
> > Chinese  are  Bad  people
>
> As the pawnish Uighur muslims have shown in international politics, one
> man's terrorist is merely another's freedom-fighter

Yes, the 19 9/11 hijackers were heroes to the Muslim world, while they
were terrorists to America and Europeans.

[Satish]

On May 19, 3:56 pm, rst0 <rst0w...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On May 19, 2:08 pm, RichAsianKid <RichAsian...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 19/05/2013 12:23 AM, rst0 wrote:
>
> > > On May 18, 8:43 pm, RichAsianKid <RichAsian...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > >> On 05/05/2013 12:35 PM, rst9 wrote:
>
> > >>> On May 5, 8:26 am, "charlie vietcong , fighter for communism
> > >>> Tawhid" <vietcong.charlie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>> ja good Idea
>
> > >>>> the YANKEE model
>
> > >>>> but our VC are DEAD against the US system
>
> > >>> All nations should follow their ideas and system for themselves.
>
> > >> Don't forget blacks, whites, browns are different too - they're not
> > >> interchangeable nor same nor can be lifted up by the west. They' yet
> > >> somehow made same? Peoples are different, no?
>
> > > In a way, people ARE interchangeable, but their background and racial
> > > past will not allow them to be interchangeable.
>
> > > When, at a point in time, humanity comes to a point of almost
> > > extinction, then and only then will humanity becomes interchangeable.
>
> > People are interchangeable only when compared to, say, chimpanzees.
>
> Hummm!!! Interesting thought!!! I wonder if anyone try to mix human
> with a chimanzee!!!!
> Would that create a "chimphuman" or a "humanpanzee"????
>

rst0/7/9 posted his photo on the inter net from his younger days.


http://img16.imageshack.us/img16/3928/chineseman.gif

He could either be a chimphuman or a humanpanzee - but he doesn't know
for sure because he only knows his Taishanese step mother and his
alleged biological father in California.

rst0/7/9, your obsession is interfering with Meichi Thai's attempt to
provide you with a clean catheter and a clean diaper at all times.
Give her a chance by sitting naked on your recliner 24/7 instead of
whiling away your time and energy on earning 50 cents per post from
the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) dictatorship in Beijing.


*****************
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/50_Cent_Party

The 50 Cent Party are Internet commentators (网络评论员, 網絡評論員, wǎnglù
pínglùn yuán) hired by the government of the People's Republic of
China (both local and central) or the Communist Party to post comments
favorable towards party policies in an attempt to shape and sway
public opinion on various Internet message boards. The commentators
are said to be paid for every post that either steers a discussion
away from anti-party or sensitive content on domestic websites,
bulletin board systems, and chatrooms, or that advances the Communist
party line.

*******************

[rst0]

Time to get up for your second shift night job, huh, Satish?

Satish, the small time crook and thief with a dozen aliases,
instead of making up lies and posting lies on soc.culture.china,
go to school and learn something.

You have proven yourself to be a crook and thief by the many aliases
you have in the past.
No company would hire you, the only work you could find are the low
level jobs you are doing now. You work the second shift, from 6PM to
2AM, low level job, most likely, work as a bar tender.

And get out of that filthy ghetto apartment you are living in.
And just to show how bad the place is,
the iron gate is locked on 116th Street blocking off all traffics
on a city street.

[RichAsianKid]

On 04/05/2013 5:53 AM, Zanzibar wrote:
> On May 4, 1:59 pm, RichAsianKid <RichAsian...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> On 03/05/2013 12:01 PM, Zanzibar wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On May 3, 10:45 am, RichAsianKid <RichAsian...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>> No less from American patriots:
>>
>>>> http://tinyurl.com/bws5oxr
>>
>>>> If Singapore can do it, shouldn't NorthEast Asia?
>>
>>> Mass immigration of workers and expatriates from one country to
>>> another that began in the early 80s was caused
>>> by the Americans whose jobs were taken away and shipped to overseas.
>>> This started their clamours to take back their jobs from their
>>> overseas relocations.
>>
>>> So this article clearly explains on why everyone in their own country
>>> is naturally objecting to the mass immigration
>>> imported from other countries, and yet they still want to advocate
>>> going to those shipped locations to get back their
>>> jobs and still make more money than they were before.
>>
>>> This was because their overseas plants will offer them even more pay
>>> with overseas allowances to boot than what
>>> they cannot earn if they were to stay on in their own home in their
>>> own country or to remain jobless in their own country.
>>
>>> These shipped compnaies will bargain for "trade-offs" wit the host
>>> ocuntry wwhereby they will demand that if they
>>> set up a company with an X amount of investments with a set of
>>> revenues hhat they will ask for their key staff to
>>> be largely from their company instead.
>>
>>> This is regardless if their key staff is truely unreplaceable or not
>>> by local people of the same or even higher
>>> competences than them.
>>
>>> They can fake up their claims of demands that their staff are more
>>> skills and talented when they really are of the same quality like
>>> administrative director, manager, or secretary or a buyer or even a
>>> vice president or top executive in the company.
>>
>>> This problem of mass immgration of workers or executives of
>>> expatriates have been a strategy of these American
>>> firms to get jobs for their own people in overseas operations.
>>
>>> Mass immigration can be stopped if all the countries in the world can
>>> gather themselves together to address on
>>> non- mass immgrations of workers and expatriates to or from other
>>> coutnries.
>>
>>> Unfortunately, US and Britain and other EU countries are not countries
>>> that will correspond their employment of
>>> people from other countries. They set rules that is not easy for
>>> anyone ot work there.
>>
>>> For example, in the US, overseas students graduated fro mtheri
>>> unviersities are not allowed to work there. Foreign talents of
>>> experience
>>> from other countries are not easy to enter freely into their country
>>> to find a job there without having a prior approval
>>> of H1A employment pass that approved to the employer.
>>
>>> Employer there has to advertise many times to show proof of not having
>>> the right persons for their jobs and not for their reduced salary
>>> offered to the overseas candidates.
>>
>>> In turn, in Singapore, everyone from overseas can enter and find their
>>> jobs there. The emplyers can even take waway their local jbos anfd
>>> gave them to the overseas who are cheaper to hire them.
>>
>>> The people in Singapore are being screwed left and right by their
>>> government instead with influx of foreigners to subjucate them and to
>>> subdue their pay and even to replace of them quickly.
>>
>> Those are very reasonable claims, and I think in contrast to Canadian or
>> Australian immigration policies, the US policy is often one of
>> short-sightedness if not downright idiocy. It in effect selects not just
>> for the proletariat but the bottom of the barrel - "the path of least
>> resistance to work and citizenship is to stay illegally" as Americans
>> effectively quip - perhaps there's an under-element of macho noble
>> salvation complex built in; and while all are for $ for sure many many
>> more countries that need way more $ than America will not even begin to
>> let you in.
>>
>> And the point of the post goes deeper than wicked greedy capitalists:
>> the contrast is that of Singapore vs American _people_ (note that May
>> Day is pun)- those Singaporean troopers marching on the streets are not
>> Maserati-driving company executives afterall. Yet in America it's the
>> May celebration of illegals getting rights of citizenship and let's now
>> all altogether now sing kumbaya - perhaps coinciding with Cinco de Mayo.
>> One is a healthy demonstration of a people against foreigners; the other
>> is a paralyzed people helpless against onslaught. Once again, one's a
>> healthy 21st society with a healthy infrastructure that functions for
>> its people, versus a 21st society that effectively self-liquidates for
>> its future generations if not for its people now.
>
> Singapore uses immigrants from low end countries and issues them work
> passes with tenures for levels and grades
> to undermine its own people of Singaporeans from their jobs of employs
> so that they can be displaced them or
> retrenched them to enable employers to get ready alternative
> replacement sources of cheap or cheapest salaried
> labour cost from third world countries.
>
> Whereas, America uses mainly of their own labour from Americans to run
> and employ in their jobs and they keep
> up their salary that keeps up to their cost of living.
>
> Americans deliberately refused to grant their immgrants from any
> legality of employ to forestall them from encroachign their high jobs.
> Americans keep them in their employs with a a yellow card on their
> hands not to bite when they are in employ with them.
>
> So American have a subtle meaning in aking use of their illegal
> employs of immigrants as also their legal employ
> of illegal immigrants. By not giving them legal status of their entry
> to America and not giving them a work pass or
> visa to work in America, it was like telling them they are to live and
> die on their own without care from their employers
> or government.
>
> Perhaps this makes it also easy for Americans to exploit them and make
> use of them to do illegal things such as
> smugglings of things, and selling of illegal stuffs, etc. They also
> can pay them cheaply without union or health
> insurance, knowing that they have no recourse to blame them even their
> ay is not consistent with market pay for
> legal Americans.
>
> They also can make use of their vulnerability of being their illegals
> in not giving them adequate of health needs and
> care and their freedoms to seek promotions of jobs and pays and to
> their choices of choosing their work and their
> making of free speeches.
>
> If America do think this outcome was not the case of intention of not
> giving them legal status of their illegal entry
> in America, then they should have deported them and sent them home to
> their own countries or of their choosings
> and not let them stayed on in America for so many years.
>
> It was likely forever playing them of their fears and hide and seeks
> played from the authorities. If they gave them
> renewal work passes with different tenures of works and stays for
> them, there is at least certainty for them to know
> where they stands in their status of employment or immigrant in
> Ameria.
>
> If these illegal immigrants are gvien a deifned tenures on their work
> passes or permanent work residency in
> America, they can have a chance to go back to visit their home
> countries with a proper wwrok pass and updated
> passports from home country when they have off-days or vacation to go
> home to see their loved ones.
>

From BBC:

http://tinyurl.com/cbteko9

Not all is lost, some foresee consequences.

As aside I have more sympathy actually for these SE Asians going to work
in Hong KOng. They did _not_ break any law and yes, there's no denying
they often work in squalid conditions. Yet, when they first stepped
their feet in Hong Kong - they didn't break the law. Even in America
they're probably some of the most agreeable foreign hires there are.

Of course, Singapore should continue to learn from America. America can
even be excused if it launched an experiment which ultimately failed.
Look after WWII. Look at the Golden American Era without (immigrant)
input etc. Now contrast the then surfin' Golden State with a now 20+%
illiteracy rate??

Of course. It's sad to see ruin to any country (empire you may call it);
good intentions notwithstanding.

It's greater tragedy if one doesn't learn. :)

[RichAsianKid]

On 19/05/2013 6:56 PM, rst0 wrote:
> On May 19, 2:08 pm, RichAsianKid <RichAsian...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> On 19/05/2013 12:23 AM, rst0 wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On May 18, 8:43 pm, RichAsianKid <RichAsian...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On 05/05/2013 12:35 PM, rst9 wrote:
>>
>>>>> On May 5, 8:26 am, "charlie vietcong , fighter for communism
>>>>> Tawhid" <vietcong.charlie...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> ja good Idea
>>
>>>>>> the YANKEE model
>>
>>>>>> but our VC are DEAD against the US system
>>
>>>>> All nations should follow their ideas and system for themselves.
>>
>>>> Don't forget blacks, whites, browns are different too - they're not
>>>> interchangeable nor same nor can be lifted up by the west. They' yet
>>>> somehow made same? Peoples are different, no?
>>
>>> In a way, people ARE interchangeable, but their background and racial
>>> past will not allow them to be interchangeable.
>>
>>> When, at a point in time, humanity comes to a point of almost
>>> extinction, then and only then will humanity becomes interchangeable.
>>
>> People are interchangeable only when compared to, say, chimpanzees.
>
> Hummm!!! Interesting thought!!! I wonder if anyone try to mix human
> with a chimanzee!!!!
> Would that create a "chimphuman" or a "humanpanzee"????
>

Not equality.

Yes, you agreed and will agree on principle of biological concentricity.
Not blanket equality.

Note: people have no problems with homosexuals who produce nothing
downstream, and evolution takes care of that. Same with bestiality. If
someone wants to hump a $10 dead chicken from a local supermart by all
means and go ahead.

Same, too, with interracial sex or marriage. If mixing is norm not
exception, races wouldn't even exist today not in the world - or even in
America. Refusal to mix is not sinful, or is it?

[RichAsianKid]

Were they also enemies to Israel?

[Mao , the HEAD of the CPC , Communist Party of China , Yellow Race Power Block]

Satish and rst9/0, can both you stop your personal attacks and instigations.

The 50 Cent Party are Internet commentators (锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷员, 锟絎锟絡锟絬論锟絋,
w锟斤拷ngl锟斤拷
p锟斤拷ngl锟斤拷n yu锟斤拷n) hired by the government of the People's Republic of

[let 's make decent staements]

New CHAIRMAN MAO makes a decent statement



On May 20, 4:34 pm, "Mao , the HEAD of the CPC , Communist Party of

> *****************http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/50_Cent_Party

[rst9]

Without the U.S., Israel can not exist.

[rst9]

[Elbert Fung]

Bull shit


"rst9" wrote in message
news:bc565539-aa37-4ab9...@ua8g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...

[rst9]

On May 20, 3:53 am, "let 's make decent staements"

<verinvanv...@gmail.com> wrote:
> New  CHAIRMAN  MAO    makes a    decent  statement

Yeah, that's Satish, the chimphuman and liar and thief.

[rst9]

On May 20, 12:25 am, RichAsianKid <RichAsian...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On 19/05/2013 6:56 PM, rst0 wrote:
> > Hummm!!!  Interesting thought!!!  I wonder if anyone try to mix human
> > with a chimanzee!!!!
> > Would that create a "chimphuman" or a "humanpanzee"????
>
> Not equality.
>
> Yes, you agreed and will agree on principle of biological concentricity.
> Not blanket equality.
>
> Note: people have no problems with homosexuals who produce nothing
> downstream, and evolution takes care of that. Same with bestiality. If
> someone wants to hump a $10 dead chicken from a local supermart by all
> means and go ahead.
>
> Same, too, with interracial sex or marriage. If mixing is norm not
> exception, races wouldn't even exist today not in the world - or even in
> America. Refusal to mix is not sinful, or is it?

Humanity's desire for sex outweighs them all.
Since the days of Christopher Columbus, the mixing of humanity is
strong and on-going.
In another 500 years, everyone will be a mixture of all races.

[Satish]

rst0/7/9 posted his photo from his younger days on the internet.


http://img16.imageshack.us/img16/3928/chineseman.gif

He could either be a chimpman or a humanzee - but rst0/7/9 doesn't
know for sure - he only knows his Taishanese step mother and his
alleged biological father in California who refused to provide
rst0/7/9 with the information.

rst0/7/9, your obsession is interfering with Meichi Thai's attempt to
provide you with a clean catheter and a clean diaper at all times.
Give her a chance by sitting naked on your recliner 24/7 instead of
whiling away your time and energy on earning 50 cents per post from
the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) dictatorship in Beijing.


*****************
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/50_Cent_Party

The 50 Cent Party are Internet commentators (网络评论员, 網絡評論員, wǎnglù

pínglùn yuán) hired by the government of the People's Republic of

[rst9]

Satish is NOT an American. He's Uncle Sam's pawn and toy soldier
marching on Uncle Sam's drum-beat.

[rst9]

[rst9]

[Satish]

On May 20, 8:32 am, rst9 <rst9w...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Satish is NOT an American. He's Uncle Sam's pawn and toy soldier
> marching on Uncle Sam's drum-beat.

rst0/7/9 is not human.He is solely interested in earning 50 cents per
post from the CCP dictatorship.

He has posted his photo from his younger days on the internet.

[CPC , Chinese Imperialist Communist Party of CHINA , the New Imperialist Force in ASEAN]

Stop it, rst9. Stop your disgraceful insults here. Stop cluttering your
posts making up of lies and posting your insults on soc.culture.china and
soc.culture.singapore . You have proven yourself to be uncivilized American.
Shame on you. Get lost.

"rst9" wrote in message
news:e95d7df6-b2ec-43d3...@oy6g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...

[rst9]

[CPC , Chinese Imperialist Communist Party of CHINA , the New Imperialist Force in ASEAN]

Stop it, rst9. Stop your disgraceful insults here. Stop cluttering your
posts making up of lies and posting your insults on soc.culture.china and

soc.culture.singapore . You have proven yourself to be a uncivilized
American. Shame on you. Get lost from these newsgroups.

[rst0]

On May 20, 8:08 am, "Elbert Fung" <a...@pongmail.com> wrote:
> Bull shit

Six million Jews can not fight a sea of humanity of Muslims.

[beware of New CPC , New Lama Itigilov]

beware of New CPC on board



On May 20, 10:47 pm, "CPC , Chinese Imperialist Communist Party of
CHINA , the New Imperialist Force in ASEAN"

[rst9]

Satish C Kumar
Also seen as:
Satish K Chembolli
Madhavan Satish Kumar C Chembolli
Satish Kmur
Satishkumas C Madhavan
Satish Mr Madhavan
Satishkumar Chembolli Madhavan
Satish Kumar Madhavan

Age: 46 years old.

Sathish Kumar
(913) 663-2023
10408 W 116th Ter
Overland Park, KS 66210-3840
Residing in Casa De Fuentes Apartment complex.
No college background.
No professional organization
Most likely profession as most Indians in this country:
Truck driver
Liquor store clerk
Gasoline service worker.

As I have said: Dark-dark skin, filthy smelly-odor Indian, This
picture must have been taken years ago showing his best side.

https://plus.google.com/107843435820508398969/posts

http://411.info/people/Kansas/Overland-Park/Kumar-Sathish/65734351.html

Satish C Kumar
Age: 46
Birthday: 2/**/1967
Full results include available:

Previous Addresses:
*****, Shawnee Mission, KS 66210-2205
*****, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670-7953
*****, Kalamazoo, MI 49006

Read more: http://411.info/people/Kansas/Overland-Park/Kumar-Sathish/65734351.html#ixzz2TQ5GS3dx

2 Reviews from everyone and 2 scores without reviews

A Google User reviewed a year ago
Overall Poor to fair
The layout and the size of the apartment are great. The staff,
management and maintenance do half a@@ jobs. It takes forever to get
anything completed. Once it is. It doesn't help to complain because
management is a joke. The tenants are loud and obnoxious. The carport
and the apartments have mold. I wouldn't recommend this apartment to
my worst enemy. You should save your money and move into a bad area. I
least you know what to expect and your saving about $300-$400.

A Google User reviewed 3 years ago
Overall Poor to fair
One of the Worst Managements i have ever come across. the apartments
are ok to live. Have been struggling with Water leaks in the apartment
and the management has not bothered to look into it till date. Have
complained about it in more than 6 times. Its a sincere advice if you
are looking for service this is NOT THE PLACE FOR YOU

[wakalukong]

rst9/0 - you are too stupid and too ignorant for any sensible discussion.
How can you live in such an ignorant crude world in Merc?
Go rape your grand daughters and your maid women.
That is about all you can do. Cock.


"rst9" wrote in message
news:bc565539-aa37-4ab9...@ua8g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...

[Mao , the HEAD of the CPC , Communist Party of China , Yellow Race Power Block]

Are these not your lies and abusive hooligan insults? Who gave your right to
abuse on others?

"rst0" wrote in message
news:96f34851-f669-403d...@zo5g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...

[RichAsianKid]

But you missed the main point: not all women are equally attractive even
if sex is such prerogative. Many many more would consider, say, blondes
as more attractive than bushwomen. Others may pine for a Japanese ideal.
There may also be others who prefer SE Asians.
The main point once again lies in non-random mating, which, as you know,
precedes all else. People do not love everyone equally.

[RichAsianKid]

I thought other way round when it's now the tail that wags the dog, no?