Kak ya sednya chut' sovka ne ubil
Igor Mazin
>
>Ya vot dumayu, eta hueta welfernaya u sebya v Odessah tozhe na krasnii
>huyarila? Ili oni specom eto delayut, hitrozhopie, chtobi zasudit'
>kogo?
>Skol'ko v Shtatah za sovka dayut? Ya ved' im huevu kuchu foodstampov
>sberegu.
>Blyad', selilis' bi u sinagogi, znal bi kakoi raion storonoi
>ob'ezzhat'. Tak net, u Sobora tusuyutsya, mimikriya,chto-li. V Richmond
Zhalko, Vova, pohozhe, ty wse-taki govno. A ja tebja eshche w chem to ubedit'
pytalsja. Pochemu-to ty mne byl simpatichen. Chert, obidno.
Ja wot tut na Rozhdestwo cut' negra ne zadawil. W centre, na 16-j. Dozhd',noch'.
on sam chernyj, rwan' na nem chernaja, pjanyj w zhopu, kachaetsja posredi pe-
rehoda, a dawno uzhe krasnyj, da on i ne znaet kuda idti. Horosho u menja
ne truck, i reakcija horoshaja - to'lko pnul ego slegka. Baba ego wybezhala -
zadawili, policija, skoraja!. Chas walandalis', mashin ponaehalo. Horosho on
w zhopu pjanyj byl, w konce koncow poslal swoju tetku na huj i ushel, a ona
wse rwalas' ego w bol'nicu, w bol'nicu, i chtob zadokumentirowat' wse.
Nado bylo ego tozhe w siangogu poslat', tem bolee takie kak on raz w 1000
bol;'she food stampow potrebljajut, chem odessity.
Her s nim s Makarkinym, zhalko chto on sukoj okazalsja. Ja tut wot kstati
zhiwoj primer nabljdal, chto kolichestwo foodstampow opredeljaetsja ne tem,
otkuda ljudi pribyli, a kuda. Byl w gostjah w Brookline - perwyj raz, tak wse
na Manhattane bywal. Nu mne moj drug pro swoego rodstwennika rasskazywaet -
mol, on elektrik, mog by na $8/chas ustroitsja. No tak wed' on bol'she na
welfare poluchaet. Ja emu poschital - net, ne bol'she. _Nu, goworit, on chelowek
ne molodoj, rabota tjazhelaja, nikto tak ne delaet. Teper' chast' wtoraja.
Zaezzhaju w supermarket okolo mestnoj JCC w MD, rjadom s DC. Wse kassiry -
evrei s Ukrainy. Ja goworju - skol'ko zh wam platjat? Malo, $5.5 i nikakih
benifitow. A dawno wy zdes'? Ja polgoda, ona wot eshe men'she. A chego wy
na $5.5 poshli, wam cho, welfare ne dawali. Dawali, goworjat, no nas JCC sjuda
ustroilo, goworjat, tak i angliskij luchshe wsego wyuchish', nu i woobshce,
wse rabotajut, i my tozhe.
Wot tak - kak wse tak i my.
Elektrik kstati byl iz Pitera, a kassirsha - iz kakogo-to mestechka.
Sergei Zaloukaev (CS 211)
[zaxvatyvaushaja istroija "Ded Makarkin i Sovki" deleted:)) ]
: Blyad', selilis' bi u sinagogi, znal bi kakoi raion storonoi
: ob'ezzhat'. Tak net, u Sobora tusuyutsya, mimikriya,chto-li. V Richmond
: skoro poryadochnie lyudi sovsem ezdit' perestanut iz-za shlaka etogo.
: Tochno govoryat - gde sovok proshel,tam trava ne rastet.Do sih por
: uspokoitsya ne mogu.
Tak v richmond po-moemu normalnije ludi voobshe ne ezdiat! Ja tam byl
odin raz i ponial - chto esli eta dyra - stolitsa shtata v kotorom ja
zhivu, to eto xerogo. Vot i ne ezhu tuda bolshe, chtob ne napominat'
sebe. Xotia muzej u nix tam Edgara A. Poe klevij - priamo v dome
gde Poe i zhil. A sovkov ja tam ne zametil (xotia i ne iskal osobo:) -
chernix pravda mnogo - stojat sebe po uglam zapilennix ulic, stojat
i pialatsia na proezhajushij mimo traffrik. Kartinka ta eshe...
A vy chto, Vladimir, v samom Richmonde i zhivete?? A to davajte k nam
v Washington priezhajte - u nas tut xot' kakja-to civilizacija est', i
respublikancev ne takoje zasilie.
-Sergei
: Vladimir
Dima Volodin
> Sergei Zaloukaev (CS 211) (szal...@site.gmu.edu) wrote:
> : : Blyad', selilis' bi u sinagogi, znal bi kakoi raion storonoi
> : : ob'ezzhat'. Tak net, u Sobora tusuyutsya, mimikriya,chto-li. V Richmond
> : : skoro poryadochnie lyudi sovsem ezdit' perestanut iz-za shlaka etogo.
> : : Tochno govoryat - gde sovok proshel,tam trava ne rastet.Do sih por
> : : uspokoitsya ne mogu.
> : Tak v richmond po-moemu normalnije ludi voobshe ne ezdiat! Ja tam byl
> : odin raz i ponial - chto esli eta dyra - stolitsa shtata v kotorom ja
> : zhivu, to eto xerogo. Vot i ne ezhu tuda bolshe, chtob ne napominat'
> : sebe. Xotia muzej u nix tam Edgara A. Poe klevij - priamo v dome
> : gde Poe i zhil. A sovkov ja tam ne zametil (xotia i ne iskal osobo:) -
> : chernix pravda mnogo - stojat sebe po uglam zapilennix ulic, stojat
> : i pialatsia na proezhajushij mimo traffrik. Kartinka ta eshe...
> : A vy chto, Vladimir, v samom Richmonde i zhivete?? A to davajte k nam
> : v Washington priezhajte - u nas tut xot' kakja-to civilizacija est', i
> : respublikancev ne takoje zasilie.
> Poyasniayu dlia "telecommunication professionals". Richmondom
> nazyvayut rajon San Francisco okolo Kafedral'nogo Sobora Vseh
> Skorbiashchih Radosti Zapadno-Americanskoj Eparhii Russkoj Zarubezhnoj
> Pravoslavnoj Cerkvi.
> Stolicej shtata yavliaetsia gorod Sacramento.
Mimo kassy. Zaloukaev - ne "telecommunication professionals", a CS 211.
Dlia ebanutyh kaliforniicev poyasniayu - Richmondom nazyvaetsa stolica
slavnogo Commonwealth of Virginia, v koem Commonwealth i raspolozhen ne
menee slavnyi GMU. I studentu sovershenno ne greh vspomnit' o stolice v
vesennii taksovyi period.
Po povodu vyhodki Makarkina: nikogda ne slyshali, chto govorit odin
evrei, chut' ne zadavivshyi drugogo? Ya slyshal.
> Yuri Sorkin
Dima
--
"Wine is an unsophisticated drink. They just
stomp on grapes in their bare feet."
MJ
Alex Chaihorsky
> Blyad'. Do sih por ruki tryasutsya.
............................
> Blyad', selilis' bi u sinagogi, znal bi kakoi raion storonoi
> ob'ezzhat'. Tak net, u Sobora tusuyutsya, mimikriya,chto-li. V Richmond
> skoro poryadochnie lyudi sovsem ezdit' perestanut iz-za shlaka etogo.
> Tochno govoryat - gde sovok proshel,tam trava ne rastet.Do sih por
> uspokoitsya ne mogu.
>
>
A Vy, Gospodin Makarkin, ja tak ponimaju sami iz Rurukivichej budete?
Po slogu i rifme vrode nikak ne men'she.
No kak zhe eto Vashu familiju v spiske "Mayflower" propustili? Ved'
Vash uvazhaemyj pra-dedushka (pra-pra-pra...) sudja po vsemu sjuda
imenno tak Vashe semja zavez?
A. Chaihorsky (Chaihor-Khan before 1917)
Vlad Rutenburg
>Blyad'. Do sih por ruki tryasutsya.
>Edu ya vverh po Geary, na perekrestke zelenii,sprava fura stoit,za nei
>ne vidat' ni huya. I tut on narisovivaetsya, pidor s avos'koi, shari
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^
"Narisovyvaetsja"? Blia! Neuzhdo ja sovsem svihnulsja ili Makarkin
po-russki ni bel'mesa?
"Pidor"? Eto chto, ukazom Eltsina "pidera" na "pidora" pomenjali? Kak pri
Hrusche "zajats" na "zaits"?
>zabichil i huyarit na svoi krasnii.Horosho sleva nikogo ne bilo,uspel
>ya , ato bi pizdec emu. Na nem kepka-pidorka, tipichnii MNS. A szadi
^^^^^^^
I love his consistency: "pidorka".
>baba ego - sovchiha - pidaraska,kurtka s
^^^^^^^^^
Nu vot, nakonetts raznoobrazie: teper' ne "pidor" a" pidar". Variety.
I esche mne nravitsja ego "pidaraska" potomu, chto my v detstve tak
polovoe sozrevanie opredeljali. Esli chelovek znaert slovo "piderast" -
znachit, on seksual'no sozrel, emu bol'she 13. A esli vse "pideras"
govorit - znachit, malek.
>blestkami i nakrashena kak >blyad'.
>Ya kogda tormoznul, sovok zametalsya, potom zastil tak i s neodobreniem
>na menya smotrit, deskat' peshehod vsegda prav. Vzadi signalili, ya
Vzadi? V kakom takom zade? Ne ponimaju. Libo ja za 20 let v Amerike
russkij jazyk podzabyl, libo, ty, goluba, iz T'mutarakani k nam pozhaloval.
I pochemu vse tema takaja anal'naja? "Pider" na kazhdoj strochke i
vse pro "v zad" rassuzhdaesch'? Mozhet, tebe ne po Geary, a po Polk ezdit'?
Aaaa, ponyal: ty prottotip togo provintsiala, kotoryj u zoschenko
"Kladi vzad" oral!
>uspel tol'ko pidarasom ego nazvat', u nego chelyust'
^^^^^^^^^^
>tak i otvisla.
U menya by tozhe otvisla, kogda chelovek (vzroslyj pri tom!), po vidu
russkij, ne znaet slova "piderast"!
>Ya vot dumayu, eta hueta welfernaya u sebya v Odessah tozhe na krasnii
Iz Odessy? Mozhet byt'. No vrojatnee - iz kakogo-to kolhoza v tambovskoj
oblasi (sm. nizhe). Zemliachki tvoi. Tol'ko poobrazovannej.
>huyarila? Ili oni specom eto delayut, hitrozhopie, chtobi zasudit' >kogo?
>Tol'ko hui oni menya zasudyat, u menya truck tyazhelii, davit' nasmert' budu.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>Skol'ko v Shtatah za sovka dayut?
Ot dvadtsati do soroka. No, esli budesh' u nachal'stva v rot brat' -
chrez 10 let mogut na poruki osvobodit'.
>Ya ved' im huevu kuchu foodstampov sberegu.
>Blyad', selilis' bi u sinagogi, znal bi kakoi raion storonoi ob'ezzhat'.
^^^^^^^^^
Pochemu antisemitism i polnaja umstvennaja otstalost' tak drug s drugom
druzhny? Nu pochemu, kak antisemit - tak "vzadi", "pidoras"? Pochemu esli
chelovek sposoben vyuchit' svoj russkij jazyk - vyrasteat normal'nym, a
esli v russkom jazyke ni bumbum - to vsegda antisemit?
Ischut kozlov otpuschenija za svju umstvennuju otstalost' i nesposobnost'
govorit' po-russki? Ili tam v shkolah dlia umstvenno otstalyh spetsial'no
izuchajut takoj predmet: "judofobija"?
A voobsche-to, smeh da i tol'ko, chto s yazykom delajut. My-to slovo
"sopvok" izobreli, chtoby oboznachat' umstvenno-otstalih sovetsko-russkih
patriotov kzenofobnogo tipa, a oni teper' 20 let spustia ukrali nashe
slovo i ispol'zujut ego dlija oboznachenija evreev.
I nravitsja mne, chto Makarkin imitiruet izdevatel'skuju pesnyu pro
antisemitov. Nu, pomnite:
"Na putjah tramvaj zastrjal, pod nego evrej popal. Evrei, evrei, krugom
odni evrei!"
Tak etot pridurok na polnom ser'jeze etu pesnyu vosprinyal i schitaet,
chto pod kolesa tol'ko evrei popadajut. A kak on znaet, chto etot "sovok"
evrej po natsional'nosti byl? On chto, s raskrytoj shirin'koj hodil i s
"dobrom" naruzhu? Tak kak na Geary sinagog netu, a polno tserkvej, ne
trudno dogadat'sja, chto "sovok" byl iz Tambovskoj ili Krasnojarskoj
oblasti (ih teper' prud prudi) i s ispugu ot Ameriki popal pod kolesa. A
tut vdrug vyskakivaet Makarkin s ego nedonoschennoj vneshnost'yu i
nachinaet na lomannom russkom yazyke orat' na nego :'Pidoraz! Lozhi,
bliad', vzad!" Nu, i nash tambovskij kolhoznik sovsem opeshil...
> Tak net, u Sobora tusuyutsya, mimikriya,chto-li. V Richmond
Shutki shutkami, a ved' dejstvitel'no starik so staruhoj iz Sobora
vozvraschalis'. Privykli, chto v Kalifornii voditeli peshehodov
propuskajut, a tut - Makarkin iz svoego Krivogo Roga ili otkuda on tam...
V Richmonde i tak pravoslavnih men'she stanovitsja (vse bol'she
kitajtsev), a s makarkinym voobsche vse skoro peredaviatsja. Term bolee,
chto Makarkin vseh pravoslavnyh za evreev prinimaet i davit vo slavu
Gospodnju!
>skoro poryadochnie lyudi sovsem ezdit' perestanut iz-za shlaka etogo.
Vot eto pravda. Esli etot shlak, kotoryj starikov davit i evreev
nenavidit, budet prodolzhat' "harass" sanfrantsitsev, to ne tol'ko v
Richmonde, voobsche v nashem slavnom gorode nikogo ne ostanetsja.
Podumat' tol'ko! Sotni let zhili kak ljudi, russkie byli iz pervih, kto
osnoval gorod, zdes' s 20-h godov samaja krupnaya russkaya obschina v
Amerike, zhili mirno, i vdrug obvilas' Sovkovaja Imperija, i vse Sovki
tipa Makarkina, kak krysy, v Ameriku podalis'. Do etogo eti ubliudki,
eti viznyuki i makarkiny, vse na evreev (kotorym vlasti razreshali
emigririovati iz "kommunisticheskogo raja") orali. Mol, predateli, za 20
serebrjannikov prodali nash nelikij i moguchij Sovkovij Sojuz. Ne dorgo,
mol, vam nashe svetloe buduschee! predali vy nashu Sovkovuju Rossiju. No
vot skinuli Sovkov, Rossija stala svobodnoj, teper' na hleb nuzhno ne
demagogiej sovkovoj, a golovoj i potom dobyvat'. A sovkam len'! Tuk, k
schast'ju Rossija otkryla vorota dlja emigratsii neevreev. I rinulis'
viznyuki i makarkiny iz Rossii proch'! Mol, ne nasha eta Rossija, ne
Sovkovaja! Kapitalisty vy vse i sionisty! Sral ia na Rossiju! Mne babki
nuzhny! "
No svoju antisemitskuju paranoju i zdes' v Amerike ne zabyli. Vezde evrei im
chudiatsja, pravoslavnyh pereezzhayut, i vse vokrug "velfershiki"
Patrioty Rossii, prodavshie Rodinu za 2.67
serebrjannikov. Mol, vse evrejskie emigranty iz SSSR - Sovki i predateli,
a my - emigranty iz svobodnoj Rosii - bortsy! Bortsy za lishnjuju
kopejku, to bish'. Vsyudu speshim svoe urvat'. Tak toropimsja, chto
lyudej davim. A kak razdavim - pridumyvaem opravdanie. Mol, ne chelovek
byl, a evrej, moi predki ih davili v Belostoke, i mne sam Bog velel. I
voobsche, net vremeni u menya ostanavlivat'sja, ia na "garage sale"
opazdyvayu, hochu vidik desheviy pupit'.
>Tochno govoryat - gde sovok proshel,tam trava ne rastet.Do sih por
>uspokoitsya ne mogu.
Chto, opozdal na garage sale? Mozhet, na vremja perestanesh' po Geary
ezdit'? Daj trave nazad podrasti, a potom opiat' davi ee.
>Vladimir
Vladislav
Vladimir Makarkin
Boris A. Veytsman <BA...@psuvm.psu.edu> wrote:
#Path:
its.hooked.net!decwrl!lll-winken.llnl.gov!uwm.edu!news.moneng.mei.com!howland.
reston.ans.net!news.cac.psu.edu!psuvm!bav2
#Organization: Penn State University
#Date: Mon, 27 Feb 1995 10:59:41 EST
#From: Boris A. Veytsman <BA...@psuvm.psu.edu>
#Message-ID: <95058.10...@psuvm.psu.edu>
#Newsgroups: soc.culture.soviet
#Subject: Re: Kak ya sednya chut' sovka ne ubil
#References: <3iljdr$dis...@news.hooked.net>
#Lines: 20
#Status: N
#
#In article <3iljdr$dis...@news.hooked.net>, maka...@hooked.net (Vladimir
#Makarkin) says:
#>
#>Ya vot dumayu, eta hueta welfernaya u sebya v Odessah tozhe na krasnii
#>huyarila? Ili oni specom eto delayut, hitrozhopie, chtobi zasudit'
#>kogo?
#>Tol'ko hui oni menya zasudyat, u menya truck tyazhelii, davit' nasmert'
#>budu.
#>Skol'ko v Shtatah za sovka dayut? Ya ved' im huevu kuchu foodstampov
#>sberegu.
#
#
# "Uzh my ih dushili-dushili, dushili-dushili... "
#
#
#Sharikov, tipichnyj Sharikov.
#
#Good luck
#
#-Boris
Da bros' ti ,Borya, v nature. Ili ne znaesh istorii, kak sovki nad staroi
babkoi opekunstvo berut,a potom etu babku iz doma vikidivayut? Ili ne slishal
pro sovchih v norkovih shubah, kotorie za zhratvu foodstampami
rasplachivayutsya? Dlya nih America - ta zhe ih Deribasovskaya, tol'ko
rabotat' ne nado (dazhe izobrazhat).
Tak kto Sharikovi: ya ili oni?
Igor Chudov
... deletia ...
: It is me you are
: going to kill by your truck.
Boris, I of course second you, but I think there is something to add.
Luckily, we live in a good country. He will not kill you by his truck,
because he knows that if he does, he will get what he deserves.
To preserve this goodness, by some complicated reasons we should allow
Makarkin to bitch about anything.
Besides that, I think that, for example, you have a much happier life
than Makarkin right now. He is full of anger which does not come bundled
with happiness. And you are happy and have interesting life and have a lot
of things to think and talk about, when Makarkin talks and thinks only
about Jews and zona which is quite boring.
Is it a consolation?
--
- Igor. SCS Yellow Pages: http://www.iii.net/users/ichudov/index.html
43rd Law of Computing: Anything that can go wrT&^*#
Segmentation violation -- core dumped
Boris A. Veytsman
says:
>
>
>Besides that, I think that, for example, you have a much happier life
>than Makarkin right now. He is full of anger which does not come bundled
>with happiness. And you are happy and have interesting life and have a lot
>of things to think and talk about, when Makarkin talks and thinks only
>about Jews and zona which is quite boring.
>
>Is it a consolation?
It is not a consolation, because I don't
need one.
Why should I need a consolation? Because
Mr. Makarkin and his ilk hates me? Big
news, indeed. I have seen lots of two-bit
Anti-Semits to be surprised by this fact.
He is rather typical - bad education,
primitive language, lack of logic. He is
not even funny, unlike (sometimes) Viznyuk.
To say the truth I don't see why you and
some other people waste your time talking
to this guy and his likes. The only reason
I spoke to him was to ask him to stop to
address me in his cheap pimp manner ("Nu
ty, Borya, v nature...").
Good luck
-Boris
Mikhail Boroditsky
Po-poyemy, vprochem, ves' etot spor bespolesen kak popytka viasneniya
istiny ili ubezhdeniya sobesednika, poskol'ku zatragivaet problemy
mirovozzreniya.
Tak zhe kak veruyuschyy chelovek logichno dokazyvayet suschestvovanie boga,
a neveryuyschii yego nesuschestvovanie, libo chelovek verit (a sledovatel'no,
ponimayet) chto vo vsem vinovaty yevrei, libo ponimayet (i sledoavatel'no
verit) v chto eto ne tak.
Bolee togo, dlya very ne nado nikakikh dokumentov i dokazatel'stv.
V armii ya videl nemalo rebyat kotorye chitali to s trudom, i dlya
kotorykh ya byl pervym evreem vstrechannym zhiviem. Nekotorye srazy
rvalis' v boi, nekotorye, osoznav, chto ya ne tak uzh omerzitel'no plokh,
s nadezhdoi sprashivali :"Mozhet ty ne sovsem yevrey", ibo poverit'
svoim glasam ne mogli. Odin mal'chik menya pozhalel:
-Ty evrey?
-evrey.
-I chto, papa i mama tozhe everei?
-Tozhe.
-A yesli u tebya sestrenka rodit'sa, neuzheli i ona budet yevreika?!
On eyo zaranee zhalel, dobraye dusha...
Eto ya vse k tomu, chto pytat'sa ubedit' kogo-to VERUYUSCHEGO, v tom chto
ne zhidy sgubili Rossiyu (ili chto zhidy ne gubili Rossiyu) - trata vremeni.
Obratnoe verno- ne stoit' tratit' vremya ubezhdaya menya v to vo chto ya
ne poveryu.
Misha.
Igor Reznikov
: maka...@hooked.net (Vladimir Makarkin) writes:
: [A long story omitted. The gist of it is Makarkin has recently moved to
: California from some jungle. And, naturally, didn't know that in
: California, Austria and other civilized places drivers give way to
: pedestrians even when pedestrians cross at wrong places. So, Makarkin was
[..cut..]
Though I completely support your (that is - Vlads, to avoid any confusions)
point of view, I just would like to make a brief comment. It's about the
pedestrians crossing the street at wrong places and/or on wrong light.
If we put all that Jewish/Russian/from Odessa/on PA in San Francisco stuff
aside, I just want to say that there are some rules. There are the
pedestrian crossings at some particular places, and there are traffic
lights that are supposed to preserve some order on the streets. And though
here, in the US, those are mostly ignored (especially by pedestrians), I
was glad to hear that in some European countries such as Germany the driver
is not to be held responsible for hitting a pedestrian who crosses the
street in the wrong place/on the wrong light. For those of you who support
the idea of neglecting the traffic rules while you are a pedestrian, try
to imagine yourself behind the steering wheel, trying to cross 5th Avenue
in Manhattan, NY, at about 1pm.
Igor.
Vlad Rutenburg
>Vlad Rutenburg (fi...@netcom.com) wrote:
>: maka...@hooked.net (Vladimir Makarkin) writes:
>: [A long story omitted. The gist of it is Makarkin has recently moved to
>: California from some jungle. And, naturally, didn't know that in
>: California, Austria and other civilized places drivers give way to
>: pedestrians even when pedestrians cross at wrong places. So, Makarkin was
>about pedestrians crossing the street at wrong places and/or on wrong light.
>If we put all that Jewish/Russian/from Odessa/on PA in San Francisco stuff
>aside, I just want to say that there are some rules. There are the
>pedestrian crossings at some particular places, and there are traffic
>lights that are supposed to preserve some order on the streets. And though
>here, in the US, those are mostly ignored (especially by pedestrians), I
>was glad to hear that in some European countries such as Germany the driver
>is not to be held responsible for hitting a pedestrian who crosses the
>street in the wrong place/on the wrong light. For those of you who support
>the idea of neglecting the traffic rules while you are a pedestrian, try
>to imagine yourself behind the steering wheel, trying to cross 5th Avenue
>in Manhattan, NY, at about 1pm.
Well, while laws are pretty much the same all over USA, the actual
behaviour is quite different. For example, in NY there is an open war
between drivers and pedestrians. The pedestrians usually wait on their
green light, but as soon as their light turns red, they start leasurly
crossing the street for the purpose of stalling the crossing traffic.
This is a very effective method of warfare.
Not to be undercut, the driving half of population has retaliated by
forming its own military units called The Anti-Xenophopic International
Carriage Assault Batallions, or TAXICABs for short. To this elite unit,
they choose only the best: the smelliest, meanest, most English-impared
people among those arriving in Kennedy Airport. The final test: eye-hand
coordination. It is the hardest one. Only people with no such
coordination can be accepted among the TAXICAB drivers. In recent years,
this total lack of hand-eye coordination has become so widely accepted by
the city authorities as a prerequisite fo rgetting a driver's licence,
that one cannot find a good driver even among private car drivers. Thus,
the non-cab driving population is virtually non-existent, and people come
from all over Manhattan to watch a rare non-cab actually driving on
Manhattan streets, lovingly known as the Yellow Sea.
The favorite tactic of warfare that taxicab drivers employ is called
"left and right turns". When pedestrians, seeing green light and WALK sign
shining for them, start walking, the drivers, coming from a parallel
direction, abandon their original route plans go fo rthe kill: they speed
up to 60mph and make a sudden left or right turn, killing dozens of
pedestrians and scattering domesticated animals and fowl all over the
street and sidewalks.
The best and rudest TAXICAB fighters are accepted into the most elite
military organization in the world: the dreaded LIMO drivers. The origin
of the name LIMO is not known for sure. Some think that it comes from
LIMONKA grenade, the only weapon that can slow down a limo driver. Others
believe that it is an abbreviation for Edichka Limonov Fan society. The
fact that, unlike TAXICAB drivers, the majority of Limo drivers are
Russian-speakers confirms this hypothesis. The Limo drivers spend most of
their time peacefully parked on the side of a street, playing cards and
exchanging war stories. By the old Russian tradition, they always come in
groups of three. However, as soon as their dispatcher sends them a signal
that there is a pedestrian within shooting, er, I mean driving, range,
the peaceful demeanor disappears, and a fierce warrior emerges. The rerst
is well known.
I am not implying that everything on the streets of Manhatan is a war.
No, the city fathers, who think of everything, have legislated a
daily multi-hour sieze-fire and rest period known as "gridlock".
In other, provincial cities, the unsophisticated cops hunt down anybody
who stops in the middle of an intersection blocking cross-traffic. Such
acts are deemed as the worst vioations and fined $500. In New York, the
cosmopolitan cops, aware of the need for some rest, not only do not fine
gridlockers, but actually start them. The sight of a cop peacefully
blocking an intersection for two or three hours and leasurely chatting
with truckdrivers, who are helping him create gridlock, is
painfully familiar to any New Yorker. In their noble task of paralizing
all of city's traffic for hours, the cops are helped by foreign
mercenaries wearing a notorious badge "The Garden State" on their bumpers.
V narode, this elite commando unit is lovingly called the Bridge and Tunnel
Crowd.
On the other hand, in the suburbs of Los Angeles, you see the opposite
picture. There, the sight of a pedestrian is so rare that the drivers,
upon seeing one, stop dead in their tracks for many blocks away and watch
in amazement this endangered specie. The LA drivers can watch this
wonder for hours, until the pedestrian disappears into the Mall
or Blockbuster Video, the only 2 places where the
still-alive pedestrians congregate.
San francisco, being in California but a city, is somewhere in between.
The drivers do not stop dead upon seeing a jaywalker, but they don't
speed up either. They slow down, and if the jaywalker persists, stop ten
feet away from him. Makarkin, who has just recently come here from the
city of T'mutarakan', just did not know the san Francisco customs.
So, instead of bawling at that poor old immigrant and
offending him by telling him to convert from Christianity to Judaism and
go to a sinagogue, Makarkin should have just apologized for his exessive
speed and politely told the man not to jaywalk next time, because he can
never assume that every driver around him is a Californian and may be
killed by some makarkin or ibn-mohammedov or another.
Igor Mazin
>pouchitsya godik ili dva i bit programmistom.. ili proychitsya let 6 i
>lawyerom stat. Mne kazhetsay chto gosydarstvy tolko polza ot etogo -
>poderzhit ona yego na welfare eti godi, tak ved ot nalogami potom spolna
>otplatit... CHto s yborschitsi -to vozmesh? A vot s advokata/programmista
Eta kakja, pardon, pol'za ot lawyera krome wreda? Da esli by zdes' wseh
lawerow pereweshat', mozhno polstrany na welfare posadit' ne chihnuw.
Igor Mazin
>iqr...@is2.nyu.edu (Igor Reznikov) writes:
>
>>Vlad Rutenburg (fi...@netcom.com) wrote:
... many interesting things about US drivers mores.
But I prefer traffic mores when pedestrians walk at green and wait at red,
and drivers drive at green, and stop at red, and blink to the right when
they gonna make a right turn, and not other way round, as here in D.C.
ico...@parcplace.com
>In article <fischD4...@netcom.com>, fi...@netcom.com (Vlad Rutenburg) says:
>>
>>You don't understand. The pronoun "Ty" in Russian is used not only to
>>denote friendship but also to denote superiority of the speaker. "Ty" is
>>used when an adult talks to a child, when a slaveowner talks to a slave,
>>etc. Makarkin being a Russian and you being a Jew, it is natural for Makarkin
>>to address you the way he addreses dogs and slaves. Or shoudl I say "serfs"?
>>
>Dear Vlad:
>You may be right. Moreover, it may explain
>some thing that I was baffled by for a long time.
Chush' sobach'ja. Mnogie predpochitajut "ty" vmesto "vy", potomu chto eto
gorazdo menee oficial'no i gorazdo bolee demokratichno.
Kakie, k chertu, "slaves/serfs"!
>The thing is, why does almost any Soviet
>Anti-Semite hates Odessa so much? Of course
>there were many Jews in Odessa, but probably
>no more than in Moscow, and the percentage of
>Jews seems to be higher in any 'mestechko'.
>The reason may be that Odessa Jews were
>_different_.
[i v tom zhe duhe Borja prodolzhaet zhalovat'sja na ugnetenie
evreev voobsche i odesskih v osobennosti, cross-postaja v
soc.culture.jewish i v soc.culture.ukrainian ]
Uhu, evrei-odessity "different", a vse ostal'nye - odinakovy, kak dve
kapli vody drug na druga pohozhi.
Nu, da ladno, ne budu na Borju naezzhat', che tam, eto zhe Odessa! :-)
Kstati, a o kievskih evrejah govorili, chto oni - eto te odesskie,
k-rye prosto ne doehali do Moskvy.
--
Ivan Covdy
*** People are looking for a Mind somewhere in the Universe, ***
*** because on the Earth they've been finding only the Stupidity. ***
Igor Mazin
>In article <02Mar95.22...@granite.ciw.edu>,
>Igor Mazin <ma...@quartz.ciw.edu> wrote:
>
>>Eta kakja, pardon, pol'za ot lawyera krome wreda? Da esli by zdes' wseh
>>lawerow pereweshat', mozhno polstrany na welfare posadit' ne chihnuw.
>
>sovetskix uchenyx dumaet. Coincidence? ;-)
>
Ne pohozhe. V. utwerzhdaet, chto ot uchenyh net pol'zy, a ja - chto
ot adwokatow w amerike bol'shoj i ser'eznyj WRED.
vad...@vms.huji.ac.il
> In article <3iljdr$dis...@news.hooked.net>, maka...@hooked.net (Vladimir
> Makarkin) says:
>>
>>Ya vot dumayu, eta hueta welfernaya u sebya v Odessah tozhe na krasnii
>>Tol'ko hui oni menya zasudyat, u menya truck tyazhelii, davit' nasmert'
>>Skol'ko v Shtatah za sovka dayut? Ya ved' im huevu kuchu foodstampov
>
>
> "Uzh my ih dushili-dushili, dushili-dushili... "
>
>
>
> Good luck
>
> -Boris
Ugu,
a ved' 2 mesyaca nazad vyglyadel prikol'nym malym. I chuvstvo yumora u nego
est', i mozgi prisutstvuyut. Zhalko...
Best wishes from Jerusalem,
vad...@vms.huji.ac.il
> Po povodu vyhodki Makarkina: nikogda ne slyshali, chto govorit odin
> evrei, chut' ne zadavivshyi drugogo? Ya slyshal.
>
Dima, tut ya s toboj solidaren.
U menya oni kazhdyj den' iz - pod koles porkhayut kak babochki. A ya...
Nu chto ya...? Materyu ikh, gadov, tikhonechko. No tol'ko po-russki, tol'ko
po-russki. Ochen' trudno ezdit' po Ierusalimu...
Alex Kuznetsov
> From: sim...@bu.edu (Simon Streltsov)
>
}> ya dumayu, est' _tri_ kategorii lyudei i ne nado ih smeshivat':
}> 1. kotorie i tam galovalis'
}> 2. kotorie ne galovalis', a teper' ponyali shto zrya ne galovalis',
}> 3. kotorie ne ponyali shto zrya ne galovalis', no vidyat shto
}> galova'tsya vigodnee chem ne galovat'sya (hotya i ne chasto, IMHO)
}> 4. i kotorie ne ponyali shto zrya ne galovalis', no na vsyakii sluchai
}> toge uehali
}>
}> a v ostal'nom ti prava
}>
}> Simcha, who increases in Adar
CeMa, can you count to three?
Alex
Mikhail Bolislavsky
: - What do you call 50 lawyers buried in the sand up to their necks?
: - Not enough sand.
: Sasha
talking about simplistic views....
How do you call a person who entered a contract and now faces a
million-worth-law suit for damages?
A dumb person who did not have enough brain to contact a lawyer who could
draw a legally efficient contract for him
It is time for you to go beyond labels and stereotypes
S yvazheniyem,
Olga Gutman AKA Olga1 Olechka1 Akulenok1
Alex S. Katz
Igor Mazin <ma...@quartz.ciw.edu> wrote:
>Wyrastesh', budesh' lawyerom - boris' za normal'nye zakony. Chob kazhdyj mog
>prochitat' i w takom elementarnom sluchae obojtis' bez advokata. I eto ne
>chudo - w bol'shinstwe ciwilizowannyh stran tak.
Nu, ty i seichas mozhesh' oboitis' bez advokata, pravda
dlya etogo chitat' nado umet'. ;-)
A vot ty mne skazhi, Igor', pochemu by eto kazhdomy
ne umet' i mashinu pochinit', i Runge-Kutta primenit',
i zuby svoi samomu vyrvat', i detei samomu uchit',
i teschu samomu poxoronit'.
You have the right to represent yourself, but you
do not bear the responsibility to know about it.
Sasha
m...@physics.berkeley.edu
>A vot ty mne skazhi, Igor', pochemu by eto kazhdomy
>ne umet' i mashinu pochinit', i Runge-Kutta primenit',
>i zuby svoi samomu vyrvat', i detei samomu uchit',
>i teschu samomu poxoronit'.
Igor is not talking about repairing the car. He is talking about a car with
stearing wheel in the trunk and the brake pedal under the hood. Both equipped with
seats for specially trained professionals to operate them.
Or about Runge-Kutta routine, that would not run, unless you specify correct
phase of Jupiter and exchange rate of Mongolian tugric as input parameters.
Yury
Vlad Rutenburg
>Vlad Rutenburg (fi...@netcom.com) wrote:
>: nkr...@cs.umb.edu (Natalia S. Krasheninnikova) writes:
>Vlad! pyblichno bery svoi slova obratno i izvin'aus'.
Gag govorjat po-anglisski: apologies wholeheartedly accepted.
>: Soglasen s Vami v Vashej ljubvi i uvazhenii k Rossii. A vot s poslednej
>: frazoj - ne soglasen. Kto zhe, kak ne Rossija, vinovat v tom, chto
>: praviteli - kozly? Kto Eltsina vybiral? Frantsija? A kto 25% golosov za
>: Zhirinovskogo otdal? Germanija? Esli uzh za sobstvennie postupki, za
>: sobstvennie golosa na vyborah ljudi ne berut otvetsvennosti, to kakaja u
>: nih nadezhda?
>ny, ja dymaju eto delo istoricheskoje.
>narod y nas po chasti ypravlenija tochneje kak barani
>odin im navret s tri koroba, oni emy i pover'at. i yzh povtor'alos'
>eto milion raz, a vse ravno ver'at
>no, smeju zamatit', chto praviteli ochen' chasto lish' podstavnie
>peshki. chestno govor'a, ja ne dymaju, chto eltsin vse eto sam
>vidymal.
Russia is facing enormous challenges. Having to undo 70 years of destruction
done during the Soviet period is tremendously dificlut. Ja vspominaju, chto
Aksenov skazal gde-to v nachale 80-h godov na vopros, stanet li Rossija snova
zhit' po-chelovecheski v izmerimom buduschem: "Iz akvariuma s zhivymi rybkami
legko sdelat' uhu. Obratnyj protsess namnogo slozhnee".
The new Russia not only has to build its infrastructure from scratch, it has
to dismantle the old one first. Not only do the people have to learn the new
mentality, but to "unlearn" the old Sovok one. Thus, to expect any leader to
solve these problems quickly is absurd. However, he should do as much good as
possible and do as little harm as possible. Of course, Eltsin's Chechen
fiasco, his body guards' behavior, his firing of Moscow's prokuror, his
unabashed determination to use any pretext to prevent free presedential
elections in the future - all this does great harm.
Will the people learn and wise up? Well, people have already learned a lot.
For example, to refuse to shoot at their own compatriots (the White House
conflict excepted), to oppose any non-defensive war.Will people also learn
not to trust politicians who promise to feed them with "manna nebesnaja"?
Maybe. However, even the more experienced voters in Europe and USA still
believe cheap undeliverable promises. The question for now is: will people
start paying *some* attention to realists? Will lack of logic and
"nesposobnost' svjazat' dvuh slov" remain a prerequisite for an elected
public office?
Pozhivem - uvidim.
(Meaningless statistics: zametili li vy, chto vo glave Rossijskogo
pravitel'stva uzhe 78 ne bylo ni moskvicha, ni peterburzhtsa? A s 1924 po
1992 - ni odnogo severjanina. Eto ja k voprosu o sklonenijah i padezhah.)
Misha Verbitsky
>In article <06Mar95.04...@granite.ciw.edu>,
>Igor Mazin <ma...@quartz.ciw.edu> wrote:
>
>>Sasha, you seriously think that negative attitutde against lawyers is just
>>a pop-culture? Come on. I do not want to deprive you of pleasure of thinking
>>this out yourself by chewing and putting in your mouth half-digested.
>
>Nice try but no sigar.
>Now try to figure out why pepsi is pop-culture, although it
>has been reported to actually quench thirst in lab animals.
>
>>Just to give you the general lines of arguments: (a) try to compare lawyers'
>>role in USA and in ither civilized country and (b) try to make alist of
>>the worst problem of American society, as you see them, and think how many
>>of them, fully or partially, can be blamed to lawyers.
>
>You want to discuss the legal system in the US?
>Fine. That could be interesting.
>
>Or you just want to blame the lawyers for the
>shortcomings of the legal system, teachers - for the
>failing education, drivers - for the bad condition of the
>roads, and police - for the crime rates.
I always despised this `Katz' creature, so this article is not
directed to him and his lawyers-friends. I just want to point
out that which I read from people as diverse as Dereck Bok
(a lawyer by education, and Harvard president for decades),
Playboy and, well, any counterculture fanzine. That lawyers in US
are the people who profit from the deficient and absurd legal
system, there is no guilt of lawyers. On the other hand, the
lawyers are the most paid group of people (say, even comparing
with executives, an average lawyer gets paid more than an
average executive). Hence they form an elite.
US is ruled by this elite - the Congress and Senate,
consiting of the same elite, pass the stupid and criminal
laws, like drug prohibitions, or Prohibition of 20-ies,
which are against the general opinion (at least if we
discount the brainwashing, which is also paid for by the
elite, e. g., lawyers - there are books written, say,
on brainwashing campaign which preceded the adoption of
marijuana laws). Hence the lawyers, congressmen etc,
who profit from criminal legal system, are the people
chiefly responsible for this system. On the other hand,
teachers are not well paid and not well educated, so
they take no guilt and no profit in faults of education -
it is the lawyers and congressmen who are responsible
for teachers' low pays and ignorance.
What `Katz' wrote is similar to saying that
Communist system was deficient, but there is no
reason to say that Commie bosses are scum, because
it is the system which is guilty. Of course, the
Commie bosses (and lawyers, which are comparably
evil), who profited from Commie system, are the
scummiest scum of the earth - well, together with
this `Katz' asshole. Saying this, I don't say
that all and every of Commie bosses (or lawyers) are
assholes - I believe that most of them were ordinary
people not aware of their doings. Still, their collective
identity is about as evil as it gets. On the other
hand, I would take as granted that in person most
Commie bosses were nice people - at least nicer
than that `Katz' scummy hole.
Returning to the `Subject:' of this article,
`Makarkin' is really a cool guy if he indeed killed
someone like `Katz' - there are lots of people who
pollute this world and deserve to be exterminated.
On the other hand, `Makarkin' probably boasted - he
may have liked to kill someone, but not much `guts'.
Misha`.'
Alex S. Katz
Mikhail Bolislavsky <mqb...@is2.nyu.edu> wrote:
>Advokat, esli on poryadochnii i znayuschii, eto9
>ochen poleznii chelovek
Nu s etim nikto i ne sporit.
Tut vot narod po gluposti vyskazyvaet mnenie, chto takix
osobei voobsche v prirode ne suschestvuyet. ;-)
A kak eto vy uzhe YeU zakonchili tak rano?
U menya priyatel' byl, tak on srednyuyu shkolu
zakonchil i v institut postupil v 14 let
(nu pravda emy Sept.13 na 1-om kurse 15 ispolnilos';-)
nu dyk tam ponyatno, on vodku vmesto chaya s detskogo
sada pil.
>Olya Gutman
Sasha
Dragon Fly
> Subject: Kak ya sednya chut' sovka ne ubil
> Date: 11 Mar 1995 22:53:30 GMT
> From: GI...@delphi.com
> Organization: Delphi Internet Services Corporation
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Quoting simon1 from a message in soc.culture.soviet
>
> si> Message-ID: <3jpqoh$6...@news.bu.edu>
> si> Sergei Zaloukaev (CS 211) (szal...@site.gmu.edu) wrote:
> si> : Luboj narod poluchaet takoe pravitelstvo, kakoe on zasluzhivet.
> si> (Bismark, I think)
> si> Senya
>
> No, it was Dr. Gebbels.
Wrong again.
Quote from "The State and the Revolution" by V.I.Lenin
(by memory):
. Any government is worth of its nation, as well as any nation
is worth of its government.
Cordially,
Dragon
>
> ==================================================================
> _ | \ | Alex Iatskovski
> / | | \ | GI...@delphi.com
> / | | \ / |
> /____ | | \ / |
> / | | _/ | A&M Co. P.O. Box 150519
> _/ _| & _| _| Brooklyn NY 11215-0519 USA
> ==================================================================
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
vad...@vms.huji.ac.il
> Ne pohozhe. V. utwerzhdaet, chto ot uchenyh net pol'zy, a ja - chto
> ot adwokatow w amerike bol'shoj i ser'eznyj WRED.
Umischa-a-a-a!
Nu kakoj zhe ot nikh vred: ikh povsemestvoe i ezheminutnoe prisutstvie
garantiruet tebe nechto neizmewrimo cennoe - vozmozhnost', khotya by prizrachno
-principial'nuyu otstaivat' svoi prava.
Trebovat' ot nikh beskorystiya i vysokoj morali glupo: oni ne dlya
etogo pridumany.
Example: a nu-ka vspomni, byl li shans u kogo-nibud' v SSSR posporit'
s vlast'yu, naprimer, kogda ona reshila vyschityvat' s ot'ezzhantov za vysshee
obrazovanie. Ili poluchit' den'gi za kvartiru.
Ili, naprimer, pozhalovat'sya na nachal'nika Otd.Kadrov, kotoryj na
tvoe "Zd-g-aste" otvechal "Do svidan'ya". Vse-taki yuristy nuzhny i polezny.
Bez nikh bylo by ochen' legko tebya prizhat' k nogtyu.
Vadim
Igor Mazin
>In article <05Mar95.04...@granite.ciw.edu>, ma...@quartz.ciw.edu (Igor Mazin) writes:
>> Ne pohozhe. V. utwerzhdaet, chto ot uchenyh net pol'zy, a ja - chto
>> ot adwokatow w amerike bol'shoj i ser'eznyj WRED.
>
>Bez nikh bylo by ochen' legko tebya prizhat' k nogtyu.
> Vadim
>
Wrode my wse zdes' gramotnyje, a kogda nauchimsja chitat' drug druga? J azhe
jasno napisal - w Amerike. Wdrugih stranah juriosty delajut swoe delo i
prinosja swoju pol'zu.
Igor Mazin
>
>Eh MAzin Mazin i lyubish zhe ti soveti davat. A moi papa govorit chto umnii
>lyubit ychitsya a dyrak lyubit ychit
>Uchaschayasya Cornell Law School Olya Gutman
Prijatno s wami poznakomitsja, Ol'ga Antonovna Chekhowa-Gutman.
Michael Kagalenko
Mikhail Bolislavsky <mqb...@is2.nyu.edu> wrote:
]: - What do you call 50 lawyers buried in the sand up to their necks?
]: - Not enough sand.
]: Sasha
Yay, men ! Right to the point ! Do you know, though, how many lawyers does
it take to shingle the roof ? - Depends on how thin you slice 'em !
]It is time for you to go beyond labels and stereotypes
Absolutely ! Time to go beyond words and start some action
And here comes the revival of my old signature. Use only as directed.
Void where taxed or prohibited by Law. Provided as is. Does not
represent opinion of any official organisation or illegal conspiracy.
In no event will the Author of this Signature, or his Emploees,
Employers and Affiliates be liable for any consequential, incidental
or indirect damages (including damages for loss of business profits,
busines interruption, and the like) arising out of the quoting,
reading or inability to read the Signature or accompanying reading materials
even if the Author or Authorised Business Representative has been advised
of the possibility of such damages.
Author's liability to you for actual damages for any cause whatsoever,
and regardless of the form of the action, will be limited to
the purchase price of this Signature.
With Warmest Regards,
Michael
PS And lawyers aren't Allowed, either ! Long live Kibo ! Hail Eris !
--
Save the Earth - kill a lawyer
vad...@vms.huji.ac.il
> I am. And electricity etc. would be nothing if not for the demand from
> the low IQ masses.
BS.
"Human wouldn't be able to reproduce without men. So, women are useless."
> No amount of scientists and lawyers could have
"No amount of women could have helped without men".
> helped without it. And the Constitutional law is not quite applicable
> to me.
Vspomni ob etom, kogda tebya budut bit' po pochkam v uchastke.
Ili kogda lishat MOSKOVSKOJ PROPISKI za slishkom dlinnyj yazyk.
Ili kogda rekviziruyut kvartiru, rukovodstvuyas' "revolyucionnym
pravosoznaniem".
Have you ever thought why it is so difficult to feed US-ians with shit? And
how they ensure it?
And why UK-ians don't let the Gopvernment to tag them with internal passports,
or IDs or any other form of numbered and registed required document?
> Dal'she chto?
A nichego. Gulyaj sebe. Dozhidajsya. Govna tebe postavyat polnyj chan, a lozhku
vydadut v profkome.
>
> Dima
> --
Vadim
ico...@parcplace.com
#In article <05Mar95.04...@granite.ciw.edu>, ma...@quartz.ciw.edu (Igor Mazin) writes:
#> Ne pohozhe. V. utwerzhdaet, chto ot uchenyh net pol'zy, a ja - chto
#> ot adwokatow w amerike bol'shoj i ser'eznyj WRED.
#Umischa-a-a-a!
# Nu kakoj zhe ot nikh vred: ikh povsemestvoe i ezheminutnoe prisutstvie
#garantiruet tebe nechto neizmewrimo cennoe - vozmozhnost', khotya by prizrachno
#-principial'nuyu otstaivat' svoi prava.
# Trebovat' ot nikh beskorystiya i vysokoj morali glupo: oni ne dlya
#etogo pridumany.
# Example: a nu-ka vspomni, byl li shans u kogo-nibud' v SSSR posporit'
#s vlast'yu, naprimer, kogda ona reshila vyschityvat' s ot'ezzhantov za vysshee
#obrazovanie. Ili poluchit' den'gi za kvartiru.
# Ili, naprimer, pozhalovat'sya na nachal'nika Otd.Kadrov, kotoryj na
#tvoe "Zd-g-aste" otvechal "Do svidan'ya". Vse-taki yuristy nuzhny i polezny.
#Bez nikh bylo by ochen' legko tebya prizhat' k nogtyu.
# Vadim
Nu-nu, horosho tebe sidet' v Izraile i nahvalivat' amerikanskih juristov :-)
Nu, zdes', pravda, tozhe vstrechajutsja takie, komu oni nravjatsja -
babushka, k-raja poluchila paru millionov, kogda na sebja kofe v McDonald's
prolila. Ili Rodney King, zarabotavshij $4 milliona (Interesno, chto ego
lojery hoteli stol'ko zhe ot LA za svoi trudy. No ne tut-to bylo! LA
eto delo bystro presek, i zaplatil im "vsego" $2 milliona...)
A voobsche, okolo mesjaca na temu lojerov byla ochen' interesnaja stat'ja
v US News&World Report. I sluchai smeshnye, naprimer, kak odin lojer noch'ju
razdalbyval pobol'she vyboinu okolo merii goroda, t.k. ego klient sudil
meriju za to, chto na etoj jamke poskol'znulsja...
Slava Borisov
> Dima,
> kak evrej evreyu, skazhite, chto takoe Head&Shoulders?
> A to ya seryj.
> Vadim
Seryi evrei? Zabavno..
D...@uicvm.uic.edu
(Alexy V. Khrabrov) wrote:
> In article <3kaob4$h...@news.acns.nwu.edu> lum...@nwu.edu (Leonid A.
Umantsev) writes:
> >In article <3k9tva$l...@dartvax.dartmouth.edu>,
al...@belknap.dartmouth.edu (Alexy V. Khrabrov) says:
> >>
> >> A vot ewyo zagadka:
> >> Golova, nogi, zhopa...
> >> Golova, nogi, zhopa...
> >> Golova, nogi, zhopa...
> >> Plyuh!
> >>
> >>Chto by e`to moglo byt`? :-)
> >
> >Barbie manufacturing?
> >
> >Leonid A. Umantsev
> >Northwestern University, Evanston, IL. USA
> >lum...@nwu.edu
>
> Horoshaya mysl`--no ne otgadka. Sluchaj
> vyshe mog nablyudat`sya, podskazka, na prirode...
>
> --
> Alexy V. Khrabrov <khra...@cccc.com>
> "Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam"-
--------------------------------------------------
Esly kryl'yami maschet - znachit kuritsa. Esly net - Duglas 8.
KOCHET.
D...@uicvm.uic.edu
> vad...@vms.huji.ac.il wrote:
>
> : Pora, pora pridumat' al'ternativnyj mekhaniz'm ograflifaniya.
> : "Graph Alex Gift-Yatskovskiy, russkij dvoryanin." Skromno i dostojno.
>
> ideya razumnaya - no, grafu nugni holopi, right?
> kogo porekomenduem?
>
> ili, on budet obnischavshim grafom?
> ili planarnim?
>
> Senya
--------------------------------------
Gift-Yatskovskomu - kholopy? Da emu vpolne BYDLA khvatit.
Schlyakhta.
Alexy V. Khrabrov
>In article <3kceac$p...@dartvax.dartmouth.edu>, al...@belknap.dartmouth.edu
>(Alexy V. Khrabrov) wrote:
>
>> >> A vot ewyo zagadka:
>> >> Golova, nogi, zhopa...
>> >> Golova, nogi, zhopa...
>> >> Golova, nogi, zhopa...
>> >> Plyuh!
>> >>
>> >>Chto by e`to moglo byt`? :-)
>Esly kryl'yami maschet - znachit kuritsa. Esly net - Duglas 8.
> KOCHET.
I ne mashet, i ne HOCHET. No blizhe...
--
Alexy V. Khrabrov <khra...@cccc.com>
``Age Quod Agis'' (Do what you're doing.)
Alexy V. Khrabrov
>In Article <3ko98f$q...@dartvax.dartmouth.edu>, al...@alkaid.dartmouth.edu
>(Alexy V. Khrabrov) wrote:
>>>> >> A vot ewyo zagadka:
>>>> >> Golova, nogi, zhopa...
>>>> >> Golova, nogi, zhopa...
>>>> >> Golova, nogi, zhopa...
>>>> >> Plyuh!
>>>> >>
>>>> >>Chto by e`to moglo byt`? :-)
>>>--------------------------------------------------
Spasibo za stishok, no golova, tudy eyo v kachel', ukazana!
--
Alexy V. Khrabrov <khra...@cccc.com>
Vlad Rutenburg
>Seryi evrei? Zabavno..
If we have Orange Jews (Juice), why not have Grey ones?
Kak tam v pesne pelos'?
Oranzhevye baby
Orangevym evrejam
Oranzhevye mordy
Oranzhevo nab'jut...
Slava Borisov
> iigoro...@mmm.com (Ilya Gorodisher) writes:
> >Ne znaju, no esli bez golovy, to eto Strekazel (drakonchik)
> Spasibo za stishok, no golova, tudy eyo v kachel', ukazana!
Togda drakonchik (Strekazel) s chei-to golovoi....
Ilya Gorodisher
(Alexy V. Khrabrov) wrote:
>>In article <3kceac$p...@dartvax.dartmouth.edu>, al...@belknap.dartmouth.edu
>>(Alexy V. Khrabrov) wrote:
>>
>>> >> A vot ewyo zagadka:
>>> >> Golova, nogi, zhopa...
>>> >> Golova, nogi, zhopa...
>>> >> Golova, nogi, zhopa...
>>> >> Plyuh!
>>> >>
>>> >>Chto by e`to moglo byt`? :-)
>>--------------------------------------------------
********************** Ilya Gorodisher *****************************************
"Rybka plavayet v tomate
Yey v tomate horosho.
Nu a ya, yebeni mati,
Mesta v zhizni ne nashel..."
Zhenya Zilbershtein, MIT '87
********************************************************************************
Alexy V. Khrabrov
Togda uzh Yudif' s golovoj Oloferna... To bish', (repost)
Est` staraya v Kimrah taverna:
Yudif` s golovoj Kruzenshterna...
A na samom dele, "golova-nogi-zhopa-plyuh"--e`to real`nyj sluchaj
iz zhizni... karlikov! Kto pervyj ugadaet, poluchit moj firmennyj
priz!