Sh. Sharawi (Raximahu Allaah)
Abdirashid<aelmi@po-box.mcgill.ca
By Salah Nasrawi Associated Press Writer
Wednesday, June 17, 1998; 10:11 a.m. EDT
CAIRO, Egypt (AP) -- One of the Muslim world's leading clerics, Sheik
Mohammed Mutwali Sharawi, died today. He was 87.
Sharawi, who served as minister of religious endowments under former
President Anwar Sadat, died at his home near the pyramids of Giza, his
family said. The cause of death was not announced. Last week he was
admitted to hospital with severe asthma.
Egypt's leading Islamic authority, the Grand Sheik of Al-Azhar, Mohammed
Sayed Tantawi, called Sharawi's death a great loss for Egypt and the
Islamic world.
``Time rarely gives birth to such a glorious imam who devoted his life to
making the word of God esteemed,'' Tantawi said.
Sharawi's ``fingerprints on Islamic teaching were matchless,'' said
Moustafa Mashhour, the leader of Egypt's largest fundamentalist group, the
Muslim Brotherhood.
© Copyright 1998 The Associated Press
Abdirashid<aelmi@po-box.mcgill.ca
Mohamed O. Musa
As-salamu alaikum,
Eebbe ha u naxariisto Sh. Shacraawi. Waxan muddo ka hor la kulmay wiil
Ereteri ah oo Masiixi ah oo Masar ku noolaa muddo. Marar aannu ka wada
hadalnay diimaha, gaar ahaan Islaamka iyo Masiixiyadda, wuxuu ii sheegay
inuu daawan jiray barnaamijka Sh. Shacraawi aanu tebey markii uu Ameerika
yimid. Eebbe ha u naxariisto meeshiisiina cid buuxisa ummadda ha ku gallado.
Arrinta ah in xadiis sheegay in qofkii baxa khayrkiisii la sheego ee Cabdi
Daud ka dhawaajiyey ee uu haddana ku ladhay in ra'yi odhanaya lidkiisu
jiro isla markaana uu doortay inuu raacaa way i yara yaab gelisay.
Islaamka dadkii u jibbeysnaa noocan qabaliyadda ah ee lagu salliday waa
mid naxdin leh. Culimadu weligood way is raddin jireen, mararka
qaarkoodna si lahjad adagi la socoto, marka midkood baxose wanaag ayuunbay
isku xusi jireen. Maanta dhibaatada ugu wayn ee jirtaa waa in ra'yigii
culimada oo meelo aanay culimadii qabtay la gaadhin lala gaadho.
Mudane Cabdi Daauud arrintan lagu dhaleecaynayo Sh. Shacraawi oo ah inuu
dowlad aan shariicada dadka ku dhiqin la shaqeeyey ma ku eedayn karaa Sh.
Ibn Baas? Hadday jawaabtu tahay maya, muxuu waa maxay qiilka uu midkood u
helay ee aanu ka kale u helini?
Ugu dambeyn, wiilkan cid baa hebel baa gaal ah iyo dadku waa juhalo meesha
la rooraya waxan xusuusin lahaa inuu ugu horreyn Eebbe u toobbad keeno.
Hana ogaado in gaalnimo ku eedayntu ay tahay shayga ay ugu dhowrsi
badnaayeen culimaddii Ehlu-sunnuha waqtigay doonaanba ha joogaane. Ha
ogaado in haddii uu eedayntiisu aaney run ahayn uu isagu noqonayo waxa uu
dadka kale ku eedaynayo.
--
Mohamed,
Nabadgelyo.
Abdi Daud
>dj...@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mohamed O. Musa) writes:
>
>As-salamu alaikum,
>
>Eebbe ha u naxariisto Sh. Shacraawi. Waxan muddo ka hor la kulmay wiil
>Ereteri ah oo Masiixi ah oo Masar ku noolaa muddo. Marar aannu ka wada
>hadalnay diimaha, gaar ahaan Islaamka iyo Masiixiyadda, wuxuu ii sheegay
>inuu daawan jiray barnaamijka Sh. Shacraawi aanu tebey markii uu Ameerika
>yimid. Eebbe ha u naxariisto meeshiisiina cid buuxisa ummadda ha ku gallado.
Dear bro Mohamed, no one is questioning his ability and talent although many
ulima did question the authencity of some of his remarks in tafsiir. I think
there are thousand Culima whom can fill his chair easily if Dhaqut Laa Mubaarak
and his regime allow that.
>Arrinta ah in xadiis sheegay in qofkii baxa khayrkiisii la sheego ee Cabdi
>Daud ka dhawaajiyey ee uu haddana ku ladhay in ra'yi odhanaya lidkiisu
>jiro isla markaana uu doortay inuu raacaa way i yara yaab gelisay.
Anigu maanan odhan ra'yi lid ku ah ayaa jidha. Waxaan qudha sheegay in culima
badan qabaan in Caalimka ku hadla ama saameeya mowqif nolosha guud ee dadka
wixii uu ku khaldamay la sheegi karo.
>Islaamka dadkii u jibbeysnaa noocan qabaliyadda ah ee lagu salliday waa
>mid naxdin leh.
I didn't understand what you mean here bro?.
> Culimadu weligood way is raddin jireen, mararka
>qaarkoodna si lahjad adagi la socoto, marka midkood baxose wanaag ayuunbay
>isku xusi jireen. Maanta dhibaatada ugu wayn ee jirtaa waa in ra'yigii
>culimada oo meelo aanay culimadii qabtay la gaadhin lala gaadho.
That is true but on this case no. Many Ulima yesterday spoke out against Sh.
Alshacrawa when he said about Haalik Sadaat, Laa Yus'al camaa Yafcal. And if
someone qoute his disgrace remarks about Sadaat it's not inaannu meel ayan
gaadhsiin lala laacay.
>Mudane Cabdi Daauud arrintan lagu dhaleecaynayo Sh. Shacraawi oo ah inuu
>dowlad aan shariicada dadka ku dhiqin la shaqeeyey ma ku eedayn karaa Sh.
>Ibn Baas? Hadday jawaabtu tahay maya, muxuu waa maxay qiilka uu midkood u
>helay ee aanu ka kale u helini?
Arrinta lagu dhaleecayay Sh. Shacraawi ma ahayn inuu la Shaqeeyay dawald
dhaaquut ah. Waxay ahayd haddalada uu ku hadlay ama ku tilmaamaya Sadaat iwm.
Taasi oo ka fajacisay culimadii dalkaasi gaar ahaan culimada Ikhwaanka.
Halkaasi waxaannu ka garan karnaa in is dhinac dhigga isaga iyo Ina Baaz ama
islaamiyiinta maanta ku jidha golayaasha dalalkooda ayan arrintu ahayn.
>Ugu dambeyn, wiilkan cid baa hebel baa gaal ah iyo dadku waa juhalo meesha
>la rooraya waxan xusuusin lahaa inuu ugu horreyn Eebbe u toobbad keeno.
>Hana ogaado in gaalnimo ku eedayntu ay tahay shayga ay ugu dhowrsi
>badnaayeen culimaddii Ehlu-sunnuha waqtigay doonaanba ha joogaane. Ha
>ogaado in haddii uu eedayntiisu aaney run ahayn uu isagu noqonayo waxa uu
>dadka kale ku eedaynayo.
This guy is not Somali as I found it. So please note that.
Ina Da'ud
Mohamed O. Musa
As-salamu alaikum.
Br. Abdi, I insist that we stick with the guidance of the Prophet of Allah
on this ocasion and remember the Sheikh by his good deeds. If a question
regarding Sh. Sha'rawi's teachings and understanding of Islam arises, then
we must apply the famous rule of "jarh wa ta'deel". (I heard uluma stating
that the only time the Jarh gets priority over ta'deel is when the
authenticity of a narration is in question.)
It is sad the Sheikh had said the comment you quoted. I certainly did
not hear it before, but don't we all make mistakes? The Messenger of Allah
said in an authentic hadeeth, "kullu ibn Aadam khaddaa' wa
khairul-kaddaa'eena at-tawaaboun". That is roughly, "Every human being
commits a wrong-doing and the best of wrong-doers are those who repent [from
their wrongdoings]." I hope the Sheikh has repented from his mistakes
before his death.
Finally, I would like to remind all of us that we have no right to judge
others. If there is a concern of anything a muslim is doing, the right
manner is assume khair "husn az-zann" and then enquire the truth of the
matter, "Idaa jaa'akum faasiqun binaba'in fatabayyanou ..." Today, the
youth read books or listen tapes that are full of allegations and
judgements. We must exercise a lot of caution when reading or listening to
these materials. We need to remember that when it comes to information it
is not acceptable in front of Allah to say that someone I trusted told me
that so and so has done or said so and I behaved so because of this. We
need to practice the Islamic principles of information exchange and
acceptance: "Lau laa jaa'ou 'alayhi arba'ati shuhadaa'..."
I conclude to thank you for finding out who that seemingly confused
brother is. I am glad that he is not a Somali.
Ammaana Allah.
--
Mohamed,
Nabadgelyo.
Mohamoud Ali
Wacaleykumu salaam,
Sheekh Shacrawi nin la yaqaano oo fidinta diinta Islaamka ku xeel ayuu
ahaa. Eebbe ha u naxariisto. Sheekhan waligey qof eedeynayo ma aan
maqal waaggii aan Masar joogey oo magaalo qaahiro ka baxsan aan dugsi
sare ka dhigan jirey {sanawiya caama Xilwaan), waxaan xasuusta cajaloyin
kiisa qudbada iyo tafsiirka in noolagu keeni jirey Dugsigaas. Qof marka
la eedeyo waxaa fiican in wax run ah oo aad gacanta ku heysid lagu
eedeyo, oo wax aad maqashey ama lagugu yiri aan lagu eedeynin. Eeddana
sideedaba ma fiicno. Sidoo kale qof dhintey camalkiisa waxa xisaabiya
waa rabbiga na abuurtey. In sheekha loogu yeero kufaar ma haboono, qof
dhinteyna in wax laga sheesheegana ma haboono.
Waxaan idunkula talin lahaa in labadan cunnug waa midka leh sheekha waa
kufaar iyo kan kale oo geeska ka xagxaganayo sheekha waa midka Jerry
Springer's show fiirsada 24 hours ee gabdhaha Soomaliyed halkan ku
caaynayey iyo Sheekha Soomaliyeed oo hadda ka hor halkan lagu soo qorey
geeridiisa aflagaado u geystay, in aan 2 badan cunnug aanan loo
jaawaabin. Sababtoo muran aan faaido laheyn wuxuu keeni kara danbi.
---
Yaa Salaam
Dr. Mohamoud.
Mohamed O. Musa wrote:
>
> As-salamu alaikum,
>
> Eebbe ha u naxariisto Sh. Shacraawi. Waxan muddo ka hor la kulmay wiil
> Ereteri ah oo Masiixi ah oo Masar ku noolaa muddo. Marar aannu ka wada
> hadalnay diimaha, gaar ahaan Islaamka iyo Masiixiyadda, wuxuu ii sheegay
> inuu daawan jiray barnaamijka Sh. Shacraawi aanu tebey markii uu Ameerika
> yimid. Eebbe ha u naxariisto meeshiisiina cid buuxisa ummadda ha ku gallado.
>
> Arrinta ah in xadiis sheegay in qofkii baxa khayrkiisii la sheego ee Cabdi
> Daud ka dhawaajiyey ee uu haddana ku ladhay in ra'yi odhanaya lidkiisu
> jiro isla markaana uu doortay inuu raacaa way i yara yaab gelisay.
> Islaamka dadkii u jibbeysnaa noocan qabaliyadda ah ee lagu salliday waa
> mid naxdin leh. Culimadu weligood way is raddin jireen, mararka
> qaarkoodna si lahjad adagi la socoto, marka midkood baxose wanaag ayuunbay
> isku xusi jireen. Maanta dhibaatada ugu wayn ee jirtaa waa in ra'yigii
> culimada oo meelo aanay culimadii qabtay la gaadhin lala gaadho.
>
> Mudane Cabdi Daauud arrintan lagu dhaleecaynayo Sh. Shacraawi oo ah inuu
> dowlad aan shariicada dadka ku dhiqin la shaqeeyey ma ku eedayn karaa Sh.
> Ibn Baas? Hadday jawaabtu tahay maya, muxuu waa maxay qiilka uu midkood u
> helay ee aanu ka kale u helini?
>
> Ugu dambeyn, wiilkan cid baa hebel baa gaal ah iyo dadku waa juhalo meesha
> la rooraya waxan xusuusin lahaa inuu ugu horreyn Eebbe u toobbad keeno.
> Hana ogaado in gaalnimo ku eedayntu ay tahay shayga ay ugu dhowrsi
> badnaayeen culimaddii Ehlu-sunnuha waqtigay doonaanba ha joogaane. Ha
> ogaado in haddii uu eedayntiisu aaney run ahayn uu isagu noqonayo waxa uu
> dadka kale ku eedaynayo.
>
abdullah mohamed
sheikh shaarawi was ahlu bida and dalal and munafiq ,he was ashari
murjia(his aqeeadh ) he the one who said in his book you ask and the islam
answer(anta tasal wal islamu yujib) allah is in every where(ina laaha fii
kulu makan!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!subahnu laahu wa taalaa),no doubt that's what he
used to teach the ignorant muslims like you ,abuot his nifaq to egpyt
pharaohs tuqat almurdtin he stated more than one time this is an islamic
goverment !!!!!!the ribaa halal,alkhamru halal ,alZina halalal ,al walaa to
alyahuud and nasara .
this are only samples of sea of bida'a and dalllal and we can give more to
the blind ignorant if it needed ,calling us cunuq i only reply to your slang
bad behiviour as allah said :(wa idhaa khaadaba humul jaahiluuna qaalu
salamaa) go and teach yuorself the tawhiid meaning of la ilaaha ila laaaha
the greates word in the dunyaa not only in you mouth learn everything about
this word and your live will change ,because onlly the muwahidin will be
safe in akhira.
Mohamed O. Musa
Rasuulka waxa si sax ah uga soo arooray xadiith macnihiisu yahay in
haddii muslim muslim kale ku yidhaahdo gaalloow [i.e. gaal baad tahay] in
labadooda midkood gaal yahay. Macnihii, haddii ka lagu tilmaamay
gaalnimada aanu gaal ahayn, kan wax ku tilmaamaya ayaa shaki la'aan
gaalnimo ku sugan. Imaam Shaaficina wuxu yidhi haddii aan heli karo
sagaal iyo sagaashan sababood oo aan u adeegsan karo si aan qof ugu
tilmaamo gaalnimo iyo hal sabab oo keliya oo aan ku tilmaami karo
muslinnimadiisa, waxan dooranayaa sababta keli ah.
Sheekh Shacraawi wuxuu ahaa nin aqoontaada mid boqollaal jeer ka badan u
lahaa Islaamka. Hadduu masaa'il ku gefona waxa hortii gefey culimo kale
oo badan. Waxaana sugnaatay in haddii qofka muslimka ahi ijtihaad sameeyo
oo uu gefo uu leeyahay ajar.
Arrinta Ashaacirada, waxan kuu sheegayaa iney yihiin dad ka mid ah
Ehlu-sunnaha. Haddaanad la soconna Imaam al-Ashcari wuxu ka mid yahay
A'immada Ehlu-sunnaha!
Ugu dambeyn, hadalladan aad sheekha, Alle ha u naxariistee, ka soo
xigatay ma caddayn kareysaa meeshii iyo goortii uu yidhi?
Eebbe wuxuu Qur'aanku ku yidhi:"Kuwiinna [Alle iyo Rasuulkiisa]
rummeeyeyoow! ka dhowra nafihiinna iyo reerihiina naar ..." Meel kalena
wuxuu ku yidhii "Miyaan looga warramin wixii ku sugnaa Suxuftii Muuse iyo
Ibraahiim, kii, oofiyey [ballankii Alle] [oo ahaa] inaaney mid wax qaaddaa
qaadin xammuulka [culayska] mid kale" Nin walba tiisaa la raaciyey e taada
badbaadi; Sheekh Shacraawi wixii uu gef ah ee uu Eebbihii ka galay
maantaba way horyaallaan adigana geeridan oo kale ayaa ku sugaysee meesha
ka shaqo tag, marxuumkana xabaasha dembi ha kaga shaqaysan.
Finally, I prefer if you would write your opinion here at SCS instead of
sending them to me privately.
Allow muslimiinta hanuuni.
--
Mohamed,
Nabadgelyo.
--
Mohamed,
Nabadgelyo.
Abdi Daud
>(Mohamed O. Musa) writes:
>
>As-salamu alaikum.
>
>Br. Abdi, I insist that we stick with the guidance of the Prophet of Allah
>on this ocasion and remember the Sheikh by his good deeds. If a question
>regarding Sh. Sha'rawi's teachings and understanding of Islam arises, then
>we must apply the famous rule of "jarh wa ta'deel". (I heard uluma stating
>that the only time the Jarh gets priority over ta'deel is when the
>authenticity of a narration is in question.)
Bro Musa, Me too I insist, we should uphold the meaning and tenant of Islam
without riding the emotion. About the issue of jarh and tacdiil its bigger than
the way you heard it. This issue is very important issue and I recommend all
brothers to read tadriib alraawi li Nawawi for its defition and applications.
>
>It is sad the Sheikh had said the comment you quoted. I certainly did
>not hear it before, but don't we all make mistakes? The Messenger of Allah
>said in an authentic hadeeth, "kullu ibn Aadam khaddaa' wa
>khairul-kaddaa'eena at-tawaaboun". That is roughly, "Every human being
>commits a wrong-doing and the best of wrong-doers are those who repent [from
>their wrongdoings]." I hope the Sheikh has repented from his mistakes
>before his death.
What he said was the polical bandwagon for many seculars during dawald alcilmi
wal iimaan. Ex Al-Dacwah played a great role in Seventies of disclosing his ill
stand as Ihsan AbdulQuddus wrote all along about it.
In addition, the issue is not the human being naturally commint errors here,
the issue is the person who wear the libaasul ilmi who gives fataawi sometimes
the has no relation to real Islam. Read his book anta tas'al wal islaamu
yujiibu and you will see many thinks you will not accept it even if you're
dhaalibu cilmi. Moreover, his politcal facet has no credibility at all
comparing to his counter parts like muslim brotherhood who were dying and
suffering wild torture in the jail of regimes because of their stand against
dhaaquut. This is what counts when muslims scholars evaluate the legacy of the
person without denying his good deeds.
>Finally, I would like to remind all of us that we have no right to judge
>others. If there is a concern of anything a muslim is doing, the right
>manner is assume khair "husn az-zann" and then enquire the truth of the
>matter, "Idaa jaa'akum faasiqun binaba'in fatabayyanou ...".
I agree with you but that did not prevent us to evaluate the live of Daaciyah
while giving xusnu althan.
> Today, the
>youth read books or listen tapes that are full of allegations and
>judgements. We must exercise a lot of caution when reading or listening to
>these materials. We need to remember that when it comes to information it
>is not acceptable in front of Allah to say that someone I trusted told me
>that so and so has done or said so and I behaved so because of this.
The good example of this is the claimed fatwaa of Albaani that he called the
war in Bari not Islamic. Those who presented the fatwa to him has one think in
mind when they submitted this pre- determinded outcome : to get the neck of
those they differ with them. They pictured him a situation that make these
brothers blood suckers then they circulated this ill fatwa east and west and it
reached in my home in the shape of cassete. And when I listened with tajarud I
sensed it how they misled Sh. Albaani and how they distorted the reality. I
wonder how they manpulated the mind of many people simple the Callaaama did
gave this fatwa and the fatwa should have fiqil waaqic + cilmi = real fatwa.
We
>need to practice the Islamic principles of information exchange and
>acceptance: "Lau laa jaa'ou 'alayhi arba'ati shuhadaa'..."
Again I agree with you and those who attack day and night the niyaat of
brothers who fought wars should excercise this self restraint.
>I conclude to thank you for finding out who that seemingly confused
>brother is. I am glad that he is not a Somali.
It seems he has a cause and knowledge. But I wonder whether some of his stands
conform the right concept of alu sunnah waljama.
Abdi Da'ud
>Ammaana Allah.
>
>
>
>
>Abdi Daud (abdi...@aol.com) writes:
>>>dj...@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mohamed O. Musa) writes:
>>
>>>
>>>As-salamu alaikum,
>>>
>>>Eebbe ha u naxariisto Sh. Shacraawi. Waxan muddo ka hor la kulmay wiil
>>>Ereteri ah oo Masiixi ah oo Masar ku noolaa muddo. Marar aannu ka wada
>>>hadalnay diimaha, gaar ahaan Islaamka iyo Masiixiyadda, wuxuu ii sheegay
>>>inuu daawan jiray barnaamijka Sh. Shacraawi aanu tebey markii uu Ameerika
>>>yimid. Eebbe ha u naxariisto meeshiisiina cid buuxisa ummadda ha ku
>gallado.
>>
>> Dear bro Mohamed, no one is questioning his ability and talent although
>many
>> ulima did question the authencity of some of his remarks in tafsiir. I
>think
>> there are thousand Culima whom can fill his chair easily if Dhaqut Laa
>Mubaarak
>> and his regime allow that.
>>
>>
>>>Arrinta ah in xadiis sheegay in qofkii baxa khayrkiisii la sheego ee Cabdi
>>>Daud ka dhawaajiyey ee uu haddana ku ladhay in ra'yi odhanaya lidkiisu
>>>jiro isla markaana uu doortay inuu raacaa way i yara yaab gelisay.
>>
>>
>> Anigu maanan odhan ra'yi lid ku ah ayaa jidha. Waxaan qudha sheegay in
>culima
>> badan qabaan in Caalimka ku hadla ama saameeya mowqif nolosha guud ee dadka
>
>> wixii uu ku khaldamay la sheegi karo.
>>
>>>Islaamka dadkii u jibbeysnaa noocan qabaliyadda ah ee lagu salliday waa
>>>mid naxdin leh.
>>
>> I didn't understand what you mean here bro?.
>>
>>> Culimadu weligood way is raddin jireen, mararka
>>>qaarkoodna si lahjad adagi la socoto, marka midkood baxose wanaag ayuunbay
>>>isku xusi jireen. Maanta dhibaatada ugu wayn ee jirtaa waa in ra'yigii
>>>culimada oo meelo aanay culimadii qabtay la gaadhin lala gaadho.
>>
>> That is true but on this case no. Many Ulima yesterday spoke out against
>Sh.
>> Alshacrawa when he said about Haalik Sadaat, Laa Yus'al camaa Yafcal. And
>if
>> someone qoute his disgrace remarks about Sadaat it's not inaannu meel ayan
>> gaadhsiin lala laacay.
>>
>>>Mudane Cabdi Daauud arrintan lagu dhaleecaynayo Sh. Shacraawi oo ah inuu
>>>dowlad aan shariicada dadka ku dhiqin la shaqeeyey ma ku eedayn karaa Sh.
>>>Ibn Baas? Hadday jawaabtu tahay maya, muxuu waa maxay qiilka uu midkood u
>>>helay ee aanu ka kale u helini?
>>
>>
>> Arrinta lagu dhaleecayay Sh. Shacraawi ma ahayn inuu la Shaqeeyay dawald
>> dhaaquut ah. Waxay ahayd haddalada uu ku hadlay ama ku tilmaamaya Sadaat
>iwm.
>> Taasi oo ka fajacisay culimadii dalkaasi gaar ahaan culimada Ikhwaanka.
>> Halkaasi waxaannu ka garan karnaa in is dhinac dhigga isaga iyo Ina Baaz
>ama
>> islaamiyiinta maanta ku jidha golayaasha dalalkooda ayan arrintu ahayn.
>>
>>
>>>Ugu dambeyn, wiilkan cid baa hebel baa gaal ah iyo dadku waa juhalo meesha
>>>la rooraya waxan xusuusin lahaa inuu ugu horreyn Eebbe u toobbad keeno.
>>>Hana ogaado in gaalnimo ku eedayntu ay tahay shayga ay ugu dhowrsi
>>>badnaayeen culimaddii Ehlu-sunnuha waqtigay doonaanba ha joogaane. Ha
>>>ogaado in haddii uu eedayntiisu aaney run ahayn uu isagu noqonayo waxa uu
>>>dadka kale ku eedaynayo.
>>
>>
abdullah mohamed
abdullah mohamed wrote in message <6mo3a2$au0$1...@news.alphalink.com.au>...
abdullah mohamed
allah said in surat alinam:(WA KADALIKA NUFASILU al ayaat wa litastabina
sabiilul mujrimin,ayaa 55) from this verse we get to clarify the
crimnials who wearing the islamic libas and caalling the people to the
badil and oppesing the haq.
sha'arawi was one of those allah describe them in the quraan to warn us
from them allah said :(ina ladiina yaktumana ma an zalnaa mina
albayinaatiwalhudaa min bacdi maa bayanaahu lilnaasi fil alkitaabi ulaaika
yalcanu humuallhu wayalcanuhumul laacinuun baqara aya159),the best
description as allh said in suurat alaaraaf aya175-176 allah said (watlu
caleehim nab'a aladii aateynaahu ayaatina fansalakha minha faatbacahu
alshaytaanu fakana minal gaawiin ,walloo sh'inaa larafcnaahu walaakinahu
akhlada ilaa ard watabaca hawwaahu famathaluhu kamathali alkalbi in taxmil
calleehi yahath oow tatrukuhu yalhath daalika mathlu alqqoom aladiina
kadabuu biayaatinaa faqsusi alqasasa lacalahum yatafakaruun).
Mohamed O. Musa wrote in message <6mn58a$kav@freenet-
Mohamed O. Musa wrote in message <6mn58a$k...@freenet-news.carleton.ca>...
abdullah mohamed
yes i'M MUWAHID ahlu suna waljamma insha aalah and my concept is the true
concept of ahlu sun wal jammaa and daaifa almansuura insha aalah every time
no matter of their number ,the haq people are always small as allah said
in quraaan our diin is milat ibrahim and all the anbiyaa the baraa from the
mushrikiin who ever they are espcially our qoom allah said in
mumtahina:(laqad kaana lakum uswatun hasana fii ibrahimawaladiina macah id
qaalu liqoomihim inaa buraa minkum wa mimaa tacbuduun min duunilaahi
kafarnaa bikum wabadaa beenanaa wabeenakum aladaawa wal bagdaa abadn xataa
tuminu bilaahi waxdah aya4),my faith is( anic buduu laaha waxdah wajtanu
daaquut) wich is meaning of laailaaha ilaalaah ,allah said and rasuul said
by the way of the saxaaba and salaf no madhabi or sheikh .
in the end to m.muse imam hasan al ashcari repent an d come back to ahlu
suna
wal jama in his book maqqalaat islaaamiyiin will you before it to late like
murjia shaarawi and if you want tawhid read kutub ulama najid like sheikh
mohame ibn abdil wahab and his sons and sheikh hamad binu catiiq and
suliiman binu sahnuun ,not those ones who speaking only about qubuur that
the murtad fahad distribute free to mislead the muslims about their diin
and show the ulama that they only wrote about the dead dawaaqqiit like the
qabr and tree,the one imean is the one who explaining the tawhiid and the
meaning of laa ilaaha ilaa laah and alwalaa walbraa and the hukum.
<
abdullah mohamed
[This article was published in the 21st issue of Nida'ul Islam
magazine (http://www.islam.org.au), December-January 1997-1998]
KHILAFA:
The Dire Need
By Br. Abu Dujanah Al-Canadi
writer of this article is from ahlu tawhhiid in canada learn from him the
true tawhid .
The Muslim Ummah is a dead nation. Like the Persians and Romans before us,
our Ummah has lost supremacy over other nations and now we are ruled by
puppets and figureheads of the Kuffar. Currently, there is no country on
Earth where Islam rules its people completely and therefore, we have no
leadership. Allah has stated quite clearly in His Book, the Qur'an, that
only He has the right to govern:
"You do not worship besides Him but only names that you have forged, you and
your fathers, for which Allah has sent down no authority. The Hukm (rule or
judgement) is for none but Allah. He has commanded that you worship none but
Him; that is the straight religion but most men know not." [12: 40]
Our so-called rulers today are not the Islamic leaders that our beloved
Prophet (s.a.w) ordered us to obey. Instead, they are tyrannical despots who
have put their own laws in place of the Laws of Allah. Essentially, they are
the pharaohs of the twentieth century. What does Allah say about these
people?
"...If any do fail to judge by (the light of) what Allah has revealed; they
are Kafiroon (disbelievers)." [5: 44]
How could it be that these Kuffar are to be obeyed? Why should they be
treated any differently than how the Prophet (s.a.w) treated Abu Jahl or Abu
Lahab; the Kafir leaders who oppressed the Muslims in their time? What does
Allah Say we should do with them?
"But if they violtheir oaths after their covenant (peace treaties) and taunt
you for your faith; qatilu (fight) the leaders of Kufr (disbelief) for their
oaths are nothing to them. That thus they may be restrained." [9: 12]
The reason that Allah considers these leaders to be Kafiroon is that by
legislating laws that are not in agreement with Allah's Shari'ah, they have
actually made themselves gods of their own religion. Since Islam is
all-encompassing, and includes things such as laws and punishments, any
other system is a rival to Islam and any leader of that rival system is an
enemy to Allah. With their open enmity to Allah's exclusive Right to
legislate, they have initiated a struggle against Allah for the obedience of
man. They have, in essence, declared war against Allah for the role of
supremacy.
"...Thus did We plan for Yusuf. He could not take his brother by the Deen
(law) of the King except that Allah willed it so..." [12: 76]. Here we see
that Allah describes the system of law of the King that employed Yusuf (a.s)
as a Deen.
"They (Christians and Jews) take their priests and their holy persons as
gods beside Allah..." [9: 31]
In the Tafsir of Ibn Kathir, a story is related from a hadith about this
ayah:
"Adi ibn Hatim, one of the Prophet's (s.a.w) companions, (who was a
Christian in the Pre-Islamic Days of Ignorance) said to the Prophet (s.a.w)
"They (Christians and Jews) never worship them (priests, holy persons,
saints etc...)." The Prophet said to the man, "They certainly do! They
(priests and holy persons) make what Allah has forbidden permissible, and
they make what Allah has made pemissible forbidden. That is how they
(Christians and Jews) worship them." [Ahmed, At-Tirmidhi]
From this hadith, in explanation to the ayah, it is clear that anyone who
accepts any other system than Allah's Shari'ah is worshipping the one who
has put his laws in place of the laws of Allah. This is a major form of
shirk and anyone who commits a major shirk has left Islam.
There are some countries in which some of the laws of the Shari'ah are
enforced, however, the few Islamic laws which are actually implemented, only
reach the poor and powerless. What does Allah say we should do about those
who establish only some of his Deen?
"And fight them on until there is no more fitnah, and Deen is for Allah..."
[2: 139] (according to Ibn Kathir's Tafsir, fitnah here means shirk, or
competition with Allah's supremacy).
"And fight them on until there is no more fitnah, (same as above from Ibn
Kathir's Tafsir) and all the Deen is for Allah (alone, always and
everywhere...)" [8: 39]
From this we can understand five things:
1. There can be absolutely nothing legislated other than the Shari'ah of
Islam. And there can be no governing except by what Allah has revealed.
2. Whoever has put his own laws, instead of the Shari'ah, into the governing
of man; they are committing shirk and Kufr and have left Islam.
3. The rulers who have done this are the leaders of Kufr. They are at war
with Allah and must be fought and killed until all deen is for Allah alone.
4. Whoever knowingly accepts this anti-Islamic form of governing is
worshipping the Kafir leader who has put himself as a god of his own deen.
And this person has therefore left Islam.
5. The nations before us were destroyed for implementing only some of the
Shari'ah. And this is what has happened to us.
This is why Muslims are in the state that we are in today. We have abandoned
that which Allah has prescribed and accepted other deens to rule and govern
us with little or no resistance. We are dead as an Ummah. We are a bunch of
scattered sheep throughout the Earth being picked off from all directions.
As the Prophet (s.a.w.) has prophesied:
"One day the nations will call each other from all horizons to attack to
Muslims as hungry diners eating from the same plate in front of them". A
person asked the Prophet (s.a.w.), "Is it because the Muslims will be so low
in number at that time?" The Prophet (s.a.w.) replied, "No! But you will be
as the foam on running water (useless and ineffective). Allah will put fear
into the hearts of the Muslims and remove the fear from the hearts of your
enemies because of your love for this life and your hate of death." [Ahmed
and Abu Dawud]
Clearly, the remedy to the ailment of the Muslims today, is to bring back
that which brought Islam to greatness in the past. So how can we bring back
the laws and deen of Allah as a system of government? What was it in the
past that kept Islam ruling mankind instead of Kufr? It is no coincidence
that these problems started at the same time as the downfall of the Khilafa.
But there are many Muslims today that think that there is no reason to
reinstate the Khilafa. They can be heard sarcastically asking, "Where did
this thing (Khilafa) come from? Is it even in the Qur'an?"
"And when your Lord said unto the angels: 'Verily I will place my Khalifa
(deputy or vicegerent) on Earth'.." [2: 30]
Here we see that it was Allah's Will to have a Khalifa on His Earth
establishing His Laws and ruling by what He reveals. His first Khalifa was
the first human in creation; Adam (a.s). This Khilafa was passed, by Allah,
to each Prophet He sent to a nation, until it reached the best son of Adam,
our beloved Messenger of Allah, Muhammad bin Abdullah (s.a.w.). When the
life of our holy Prophet (s.a.w.) came near its end, he himself chose Abu
Bakr to lead the prayers of the Muslims as he was too weak to lead them
himself. This was four days before the Prophet (s.a.w.) died. [Sahih Bukhari
1/99]
After the Prophet (s.a.w.) had finished his mission and died, it was
unanimously agreed upon by the Prophet's companions (may Allah be pleased
with them all) that Abu Bakr be given the Khalifa, since he was the one the
Prophet (s.a.w.) had picked to perform his (s.a.w.) duty (the leading of
prayer).
This was how the Khilafa was passed from Prophet to Muslim, and since there
will be no Prophet after Muhammad (s.a.w.), it was to remain in the custody
of the Muslim Ummah until its inevitable demise. We are living in that
demise of the Khalifa. But it will return as the Prophet has indicated:
"Prophethood (the Prophet's leadership) will remain with you for as long as
Allah Wills until Allah removes it by His Will. Then there will be Khilafa
in the course of prophethood for as long as Allah Wills until Allah removes
it by His Will. Then there will be kingships that will rule with thulm
(oppression) for as long as Allah Wills until Allah removes them by His
Will. Then there will be kingships of cruel dictators who rule with thulm
(oppression) for as long as Allah Wills, until Allah removes them by His
Will. Then there will be Khilafa in the course of prophethood again."
[Narrated by Ahmed]
Here we see that the Khilafa was destined to leave and it was promised to
return. This was the promise of the Prophet (s.a.w.). The period of
prophethood-like Khilafa has passed. The period of kingships have passed.
(This was when the Khilafa was passed from father to son. Many of the
Prophet's Companions and their followers refused to support these leaders
because of this, and were subsequently oppressed.) We are currently living
in the period of oppressive kingships that rule as cruel dictators. The next
phase is yet to come and will come when Allah Wills. And until Allah returns
the Khalifa, the leader of Iman (faith), He Most High has instructed us to:
"...qatilu (fight) the leaders of Kufr (disbelief)..." [9: 12]
Brothers, we can see quite clearly that our Ummah is a dead nation. We know
why and how it died. We know that Allah wants us to be led by a Khalifa who
will implement His Laws and rule man by Islam. We know that this Khalifa is
coming back. It was the promise of the Prophet (s.a.w.) that it would leave
and then return by Allah's Will. We know that under the leadership of the
Khilafa, our Ummah was alive. We know that this Khilafa will bring our Ummah
back to life. And from Allah's Book, the Qur'an, we know what we must do to
those tyrants who oppose this ruling of Islam; who have made themselves
enemies of Allah by waging war against Him.
May Allah hasten the day when the Khilafa will return and remove us frothe
oppression of our tyrannical rulers. May He bless and reward His warriors,
the Mujahideen, and give Islam victory by their hands. And may Allah join us
with them to fight for Allah against His enemies. Ameen.
-
abdullah mohamed
[This article was published in the 16th issue of Nida'ul Islam magazine
(http://www.islam.org.au), December - January 1996-97]
Dr. Omar Abdul Rahman to Nida'ul Islam:
"Muslims Should Continue to Call to Allah and Struggle Relentlessly For His
sake"
The imprisoned Dr. Sheikh Omar Abdul Rahman is a symbol of struggle against
international tyranny. The blind Sheikh has aimed all his life to draw the
Muslims' attention to the absolute necessity of monotheism towards Allah
through implementing His law (Sharia) and following His Way. We shall leave
the Islamic scholar to tell us himself about the most important milestones
in his life.
Alhamdulillah and peace and blessing of Allah over His Messenger. Dear
brothers and sisters; Peace, mercy and blessings from Allah be with you
(Assalamu Alaykum Wa Rahmatullahi Wa Barakatuh).
It is evil for a person to talk about himself, his achievements or stands.
Yet, a brief statement here will suffice.
When man started his life, Allah taught him how to work for struggle and
guided him to the right path. I have tried to say the word of truth in Egypt
and to face idols or dictatorship of a single ruler which existed, and still
is, in Egypt through seminars, lectures and lessons. Al Jamaah Al Islamiah
(the Islamic Group) put a great effort to let people know better their
religion. I have been arrested several times for that in successive court
cases: "president Sedat" case, resisting the authority case, "AL Fayoum"
case... We were showered with numerous cases. Allah, however, gave us
victory over the regime in those court cases.
I traveled to Europe, passing through Britain, Denmark, Sweden and many
other countries. I met with sincere brothers and sisters, gave numerous
lectures and talks to let Muslims be aware of their obligation to struggle
for their religion and to face their enemies. We ended in America where I
visited many states, talking about the duties of Muslims towards their
religion, how to make Islam their first priority all the time and to
struggle for the sake of Allah. No single year should pass from the life of
a Muslim without living the struggle. I then went to many countries in the
world, but ended with being framed with this fraudulent case and with a
prison sentence. We ask Allah to let us stay firm along the truth and to
benefit us with the blessings and rewards He gives his imprisoned servants.
There are many rewards and blessings in being imprisoned and we ask Him to
let us benefit from it.
The Sheikh's way is characterised with clarity and boldness, which made you
a prime target of the enemies of Allah. Would you explain to us the main
features of this way?
This way is the same way of our guided predecessors, elaborated by our
Lord's Book (the Qur'an) and traditions of our Prophet. My way was not far
away from that way. It is the same way of our righteous predecessors which
handled Islam as a total entity, that cannot be fragmented or partitioned.
It takes all the principles of Islam, all of its rules and does not
disregard one aspect at the expense of another. There are some ways which
addresses only the area of faith, area of the acts of worship, the area of
transactions or one or other areas of Islam. These are all wrong... Allah
(s.w.t) said in the last verses of the Qur'an: "Today, I have perfected for
your religion for you, completed my blessings over you and I am satisfied
with Islam as a way of life".
So Allah (s.w.t) Has brought down for us an integrated way of life, where no
side overrides other sides. Among the sides neglected by many scholars, and
those in charge of Islamic movements, is the issue of Jihad (Struggle for
the sake of Allah); viz, stating the truth, enjoining good and forbidding
evil. This aspect of Islam is accompanied with a lot of problems, suffering
and pain. This aspect has been disregarded by many. The word of truth comes
with its own liabilities. Enjoining good and, particularly, forbidding evil
also has its liabilities and is therefore neglected by many. Some may even
attack this aspect of Islam and blame those who practice it, although it is
an essentially important and vital aspect. In fact enjoining good and
forbidding evil is the dynamo and motor behind Islamic work. It is the
aspect that preserves Islamic principles. These has been neglected by many.
These are some of the features you may attach to the way I follow. However,
it is all the way of Islam followed by the righteous predecessors who
accepted Islam as a whole and preserve the Islamic system in its entirety
without partitioning and/or fragmenting.
The US administration has recently allocated a budget of 2.3 billion dollars
to strike at the Jihadi movements. What, in you opinion, are the chances of
success for this new crusade against the Islamic world?
Confrontation between Crusaders and Islam is an old one. In the early years
of Islam there were two super Empires, the Persian and the Roman. It took
only a few battles, ending with Al Qadeseya, to demolish the Persian Empire
for good. The Roman Empire, however, had many strands across the centuries.
When one strand is destroyed, another strand comes in another century, as
illustrated in the Hadith of Allah's Messenger. The centuries are
successive. The Roman Empire means the international Crusade and the
international Zionism. War with the Crusades is ongoing until the Day of
Judgement. The sums of money you mentioned is but a fraction of what the
enemies of Islam are allocating to fight Islam. This is a ferocious and
ongoing war. Whenever the Muslims hold on to their religion, they manage to
defeat their enemies. But when they are fragmented and disunited, as they
are now, their enemies manage to defeat them.
Let it be 2, 3, 10 or even more billion dollars allocated. They are only the
declared amounts. The undeclared secret budgets are very much larger. That
is only one part of the resources. The other resources are also numerous.
Allah (s.w.t) Has shown us what they allocate to fight Islam: "The
disbelievers spend their money to keep people away from the way of Allah.
They will spend it, yet will deeply regret it and will finally be defeated.
The disbelievers shall be assembled into Hell". Allah (s.w.t) also says:
"Tell the disbelievers: You shall be defeated and thrown into Hell". What a
miserable end! These are only few resources of many others in the past and
in the future which they shall spend and shall live to regret it.
They sent missionaries to Africa and said that Africa will be Christianised
in centuries or even decades. Decades and centuries have passed, however,
Africa is even better, from the Islamic religion point of view, than ever
before. Why? Their money has been lost, their efforts have been wasted and
their missionaries have achieved very little, if at all. They manage to
Christianise one, but ten new embrace Islam. They Christianise ten, and one
hundred new embrace Islam.
This allocated money does not scare us at all, no matter how much they
collect and how much they allocate. Let me remind you, in the nineteenth and
twentieth centuries when Muslims were fragmented and powerless, when the
Western British and French colonialism was in command and Islam had no
power, Who preserved Islam? And Who preserved Muslims? Allah (s.w.t) says:
"Today, the disbelievers gave up on your religion, so do not fear them"...
Gave up... Gave up fourteen centuries ago... Gave up in the fourteenth
century, gave up in the thirteenth century, the twelfth century... And so
on... The disbelievers gave up on your religion, so do not fear them, fear
Me. Despair is an ongoing phenomena. Despair to change or alter Islam. They
have allocated huge amounts of money in the Conference on habitation in
Egypt to come out with resolutions allowing adultery, abortion and
homosexuality, resolutions encouraging girls to give their honour and
chastity, resolutions to weaken the authority and influence of parents over
children. They spent billions to hold that conference. They allocated huge
budgets for those goals. That does not scare us. What really scare us is to
be split from within. We cannot be defeated from without, we are not
concerned from the numbers of our enemies nor by their resources. We are
only concerned to be defeated from within, for some of us to be our enemies,
declaring war against each other. We, the Muslims, have to hold on to our
religion and be steadfast and united around our faith, our Qebla (Makka) and
primarily around our Lord's Book and our Prophet's teachings.
Let us now move to the Crusades media blitz against Islam which is
frequently using words like terrorism, fundamentalism and extremism. Would
you define those terms from the Islamic law (Sharia) perspective?
I do not define those terms from the Sharia point of view, these are just
words. What really concerns me is that they took those words: extremism,
terrorism and fundamentalism to mean every committed Muslim. That is what
really concerns me. The original linguistic appears in what Allah (s.w.t)
says: "and prepare for them whatever you can of power and horses to
terrorise the enemy of Allah and your enemy". What is important is their use
of the word. Everyone who is steadfast to his religion, everyone who holds
on to his religion, everyone who defends his religion became a terrorist and
he is the extremist and he is the fundamentalist!
Fundamentalism is taken from the Christian use of the word. But here we find
their media attacking Muslims who do not let go of their religion, who hold
on to that religion, who work for that religion and who preserve that
religion. The West and the so called "Islamic" governments hit hard the
fundamentalist movements and extremist movements. What is the meaning of
extremist movements? The Islamic movements which preserve their religion and
hold the Book of their Lord and the teachings of their Prophet. These are
the target of Western media and those behind it.
How did you find the claims of democracy and freedom of expression and
religion in the so-called democratic and free Western world?
If I say that the central African countries have more freedom than the
United States I shall not be wrong. Those words are like a hollow drum from
which you here echo and high sound without any real meaning or benefit.
Those are hollow words, because it is freedom for themselves but they do not
allow any freedom to others. It is democracy for them to enjoy but they do
not allow others to have an opinion or separate thoughts. I came running
away from prison to the country of freedom, but I was imprisoned. I came
running away from lack of freedom and prevention of expression, but I was
shocked with what is even worse in America. Those words are only for a
specific race or specific groups to enjoy, but others are denied them.
How did the human rights, which they sing day and night, reflect on you
being in prison?
My situation in prison here is worse than my situation in Egypt's prison, it
is worse than my situation in other prisons in many countries. In the prison
of the United States there is no freedom of expression, no freedom of
worship and no social freedom. I cannot practice freedom of worship, there
is no Friday "Jum'ah" prayer, there is no congregation, there is no mixing
with Muslims, there is no celebration of Islamic festivities and there is
not a single manifestation of Islam. I am denied all of this. They justify
that denial by false and baseless justifications. They are skilled in
uttering lies. You find lies in their leadership, in their officers and in
all their situations. They perfect the issue of lies. As far as mixing, I am
in a solitary confinement since I was imprisoned in 1993 and until now. I am
living alone with no one to look after me. I am the one who washes my
clothes. They justify this by claiming that a blind person needs solitary
imprisonment... The one who does not learn English needs solitary
imprisonment! So the reasons that actually requires mixing are claimed to be
the reasons for solitary confinement!! So much for moral values. I also
suffer in prison from lack of any media, no radio, no tape recorder, no
interpreting reader. I am denied all this. No reading, no one to read
newspapers, books or anything to me. In this solitary prison I am suffering
many hardships and troubles. They put above my cell strong and violent
noises that disturb my comfort and wake me from my sleep. They are also
tightening my visiting schedule as well as many aspects of my day-to-day
living conditions.
What is really worth attention, as far as what I said about human rights, is
that many human rights organisations sent to the prison administration and
to the heads of prisons in the United States inquiring about what is claimed
of me being denied many freedom and the many nuisances I face in prison.
They sent to the prison administration requesting answers or responses. What
did the human rights organisations get? They did not get any answer until
now. Where are those human rights they brag about? And where are the
Muslims' rights which they give?
I keep knocking at the door for a long time so that they will bring me
something I need, but I find no response. I might take hours knocking at the
door, while other prisoners knock few times or call the officer who rush to
bring what they want, while for me I need many hours to get something I
need. Racism exists in the treatment. And you still find people bragging
about freedom!
What are the responsibilities of Muslims in the West towards their religion?
The responsibilities of Muslims in the west towards their religion are to
unite and develop themselves financially. They must have money. Money is the
element for life, the mainstay of life. A strong Muslim is better and more
beloved by Allah than a weak Muslim. Muslims must get the strength of money,
to have their media outlets, to have strong productivity and to unite in
industrial and agricultural organisations. They have to preserve their
religion, their families and not to mix in a way that will make them let go
of their religion. They must remain distinguished, to have their strong
Islamic entity and never lose any of these.
Is there a final word you want to give to Muslims across the pages of this
magazine?
My last word is for Muslims to stop sleeping and to shake off the stupor
that engulfed their heads for so long, to remember the words of their
Prophet to his wife: "O Khadijah! the time for sleep is over". They have to
come up as one man, to work hard for their religion, to put Islam as their
highest priority and never to forget it. If a person is concerned about an
issue, he/she will sleep and wake up thinking about it. Let Muslims make
Islam their issue. Let their hearts burn for what happens to Muslims, let
them suffer for the Muslims in Bosnia, in Afghanistan, in Turkey, in the
Philippines and before that in Palestine. Their hearts must ache to help
those Muslims and cry for not doing their duty towards them. Muslims should
care for their brothers and sisters everywhere, they should be concerned for
the imprisoned and should try to get them released, to continuously
demonstrate loudly, to write to everyone and to put the case of the
imprisoned like myself in their issues and writings.
Muslims have also to continue the call to Allah (s.w.t), and never tire of
it, to struggle relentlessly for the sake of Allah (s.w.t) and never to stop
it. Should Muslims, God forbid, stop struggling for the sake of Allah, Allah
will drown them in humiliation that He shall never remove until they go back
to Jihad for the sake of Allah. And may Allah (s.w.t) shower His blessings
and peace over our Prophet Muhammad s.a.w, his family, companions and his
followers... Ameen.
Translated by Br. Sayed Kandil
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
abdullah mohamed
[This article was published in the 20th issue of Nida'ul Islam
magazine (http://www.islam.org.au), September-October 1997]
Al-Wala'u wa Al-Bara'
Revealed in Al-'Imran (1/2)
The legal meaning of Al-Wala' (love, support, help, follow, etc.) is to
totally agree with the sayings, deeds and beliefs which please Allah and the
persons whom He likes
In an age where truth is presented as falsehood, righteousness is translated
to rebelliance and the preserving of ones land and dignity is called
terrorism, there will naturally arise many confusions about the pillars of
Iman and the facts of Islam. Those in whose hearts there is a deviation find
it expedient to twist the meaning of many sacred texts because it does not
conform with their desires and motives. Not even the principles of
Al-Aqeedah can escape their ploys. Al-Wala'u wa Al-Bara' is the creed that
guides all the actions and sayings of a Muslim and it is by its practice and
application that the ranks of the believers vary. It is imperative that this
creed be unambiguous to the Muslim's mentality in order that it manifests
and materialises correctly in his actions.
28. Let not the believers take the disbelievers as Awliya' (supporters,
helpers, etc.) instead of the believers, and whoever does that will never be
helped by Allah in any way, except if you indeed fear a danger from them.
And Allah warns you against Himself (ie. His Punishment), and to Allah is
the final return.
29. Say [O Muhammad (s.a.w.)]: "Whether you hide what is in your breasts or
reveal it, Allah knows it, and He knows what is in the heavens and what is
in the earth. And Allah is Able to do all things".
The Occasion of Revelation
The Ayah (verse) was revealed concerning a group of believers who had Jewish
friends. Those believers were giving Muwalat (support, help, etc.) to these
Jews. Some of the Sahabah (r.a.a.) said to those believers: "Keep away from
those Jews and beware of their friendship for they could seduce you away
from your religion and guide you astray after you have believed". However
this group of believers disobeyed the advice and remained loyal to their
Jewish friends; and so Allah (s.w.t.) revealed "Let not the believers take
the disbelievers as Awliya'".
Al-Qurtubi also reports in his Tafseer, narrated by Ibn Abbas (r.a.a.) that
the Ayat was revealed with respect to 'Ubadah bin us-Saamet Al-Ansari
Al-Badri who had a coalition of Jews. On the day of Al-Ahzaab, 'Ubadah said
to the Prophet (s.a.w.): "O Prophet of Allah, I have a fellow of five
hundred Jews; I see that they should come with me for support against the
enemy". In this incidence, Allah (s.w.t.) revealed the aforementioned Ayat.
The General Meaning of the Ayah
Allah (s.w.t.) forbids His Believers from exhibiting any form of Muwalat to
the disbelievers. This includes the manifestation of love and compassion to
strengthen the ties with them or to regard them as companions and friends
because of their kinship or acquaintance. The Believer can not be an ally of
Allah's enemies and it is impossible for a person to combine the love of
Allah (s.w.t.) and the love of his enemies because this is a combination of
opposites; therefore, he who loves Allah, must also hate His enemies.
It is forbidden upon the Muslim to give Muwalat to the disbelievers and
forsake the believers. There is no association or relationship whatsoever
between Iman and Kufur. The preceding noble Ayat forewarns us from Muwalat
Al-Kafireen and alerts us to the consequences of such an action, with one
exception being in extreme necessity when one must avoid or protect oneself
from the harm or injury inflicted upon by disbelievers by presenting an
outer appearance that belies what one conceals inside. This is known as
Taqiyyah, and it is only permitted under such circumstances.
The noble Ayat concludes by strongly threatening those who disobey Allah and
show Muwalat to the disbelievers. This threat indicates the magnitude of
such a sin.
The Definition of Al-Wala'u wa Al-Bara' in the Islamic Belief
The legal meaning of Al-Wala' (love, support, help, follow, etc.) is to
totally agree with the sayings, deeds and beliefs which please Allah and the
persons whom He likes. Al-Bara' (despise, desert, keep innocent of, etc.) is
the complete opposite of Al-Wala' and it is to disagree with everything that
Allah hates and condemns. Hence, there are four issues related to the belief
in Al-Wala'u wa Al-Bara', those being: the sayings, the deeds, the beliefs
and the individual persons. Some of the things that pleases Allah (s.w.t.)
are the saying of Dhikr, the deed of Jihad, the belief in His Oneness and
the love of the believing person. Backbiting, fornication, Shirk and
disbelief are some of the things that are hated by Allah (s.w.t.) and must
also be hated by the Believer.
The Rank of the Belief in Al-Wala'u wa Al-Bara'
The belief in Al-Wala'u wa Al-Bara' occupies a meritorious rank in the
Islamic Aqeedah. This can be understood from the following reasons:
Al-Wala'u wa Al-Bara' is part of the Shahadah (testimony of faith) that
being 'La ilaha' which is the portion from 'La ilaha illallah'. This means
to be free and immune from all that is worshiped besides Allah (s.w.t.) as
He the Almighty states: "And verily, We have sent among every Ummah
(community, nation) a Messenger (proclaiming): 'Worship Allah (alone), and
avoid (or keep away from) Taghut (all false deities, ie. do not worship
Taghut besides Allah)" (16:36).
The eminent creed of Al-Wala'u wa Al-Bara' is the strongest bond of Iman.
Al-Barra' bin A'aazeb (r.a.a.) narrates that the Prophet (s.a.w.) said: "The
strongest bond of Iman is the love for Allah's sake and the hatred for
Allah's sake" (Reported by Imam Ahmad).
It is one of the basis by which the heart can experience the beauty of Iman
and absolute assurance. The Prophet (s.a.w.) said: "Whoever possesses the
following three (qualities) will have the sweetness (delight) of faith: The
one to whom Allah and His Messenger become dearer than anything else, who
loves a person and he loves him only for Allah's sake, and who hates to
revert to atheism (disbelief) as he hates to be thrown into the fire".
[Bukhary and Muslim]
It is the foundation by which all relationships and dealings in a Muslim
community is built upon as described by the Prophet (s.a.w.): "None of you
will have faith till he likes for his (Muslim) brother what he likes for
himself" (Bukhari), and by Wisdom of the Almighty: "The believers are
nothing else than brothers (in Islamic religion)" (49:10).
The great and abundant reward is due to those who are characterised by the
love of each other for the sake of Allah (s.w.t.). The Prophet (s.a.w.)
articulates: "Those who love me will be (standing) upon pulpits made of
light on the day of Resurrection". He (s.a.w.) also said: "There will be
seven (categories of people) for whom Allah will Shed (Protect) under His
Shade, when there will not be any shade except His", one of those categories
is "Two men who loved each other for Allah's sake. They congregate for His
Sake, and they separate for His Sake".
It is the most powerful tie or relationship that links between people. Allah
(s.w.t.) has given it the precedence and priority over all types of ties by
Asserting: "Say: If your fathers, your sons, your brothers, your wives, your
kindred, the wealth that you have gained, the commerce in which you fear a
decline, and the dwellings in which you delight ... are dearer to you than
Allah and His Messenger, and striving hard and fighting in His Cause, then
wait until Allah brings about His Decision (torment). And Allah guides not
the people who are Fasiqun (the rebellious, disobedient to Allah)" (9:24).
It is by the means of the creed of Al-Wala'u wa Al-Bara' that Allah grants
His Walayah (the protection, power, authority and kingdom). Ibn Jareer
reports the saying of Ibn Abbas (r.a.a.): "He who loves for Allah's sake and
hates for Allah's sake, he who gives Muwalat (support, help, etc.) for
Allah's sake and exhibits enmity for Allah's sake, will attain Allah's
Walayah".
The relationship of Al-Wala'u wa Al-Bara' will be theonone to remain on the
Day of Reckoning as foretold by Allah the All-Knowing: "When those who were
followed, disown (declare themselves innocent of) those who followed (them),
and they see the torment, then all their relations will be cut off from
them" (2:166).
He who loves other than Allah and His Religion and hates Him (s.w.t.), His
Religion or followers is a definite disbeliever, "And if any amongst you
takes them (Jews and Christians) as Awliya', then surely he is one of them"
(5:51).
The Al-Wala'u wa Al-Bara' is an integral part of Iman and is necessary for
its perfection. In a Hadith: "He who loves for Allah's pleasure, hates for
Allah's pleasure, donates for Allah's sake and deprives for Allah's sake,
then that person has perfected his Iman" [Sound Hadith related by Ahmad and
Tirmithi] n
References:
The Meaning of the Qur'an, S.Abul A'la Al-Maududi
In the Shade of the Qur'an, Sayyid Qutb
By Br. Khalid El-Gharib
--
abdullah mohamed
[This article was published in the 21st issue of Nida'ul Islam
magazine (http://www.islam.org.au), December-January 1997-1998]
The Belief in Al-Wala'u wa Al-Bara' Revealed in Al-'Imran (2/2)
By Br. Khalid El-Gharib
Peace accords with Zionists, American colonialism and crusade in the Gulf,
sincere scholars tortured and kept behind bars, are only some of the serious
contemporary violations of Allah's Code, Al-Wala'u wa Al-Bara', practised by
those who are in our authority!! This is expectable when hypocrisy raises
its voice and tries to disfigure the meaning of some Qur'anic Rulings to
brain-wash the general Muslim masses. For Islam to triumph again, the Ummah
must firstly interpret the Holy Qur'an the way that our righteous
predecessors interpreted it: clearly, honestly and prophetically, fearing no
one except Allah.
118. O you who believe! Take not as (your) Bitanah (advisers, consultants,
protectors, helpers, friends, etc.) those outside your religion (pagans,
Jews, Christians, and hypocrites) since they will not fail to do their best
to corrupt you. They desire to harm you severely. Hatred has already
appeared from their mouths, but what their breasts conceal is far worse.
Indeed We have made plain to you the Ayaat (proofs, evidences, verses) if
you understand.
119. Lo! you are the ones who love them but they love you not, and you
believe in all the Scriptures [ie. you believe in the Taurat (Torah) and the
Injeel (Gospel), while they disbelieve in your Book, the Qur'an]. And when
they meet you, they say, "We believe". But when they are alone, they bite
the tips of their fingers at you in rage. Say: "Perish in your rage.
Certainly, Allah knows what is in the breasts (all the secrets )."
120. If a good befalls you, it grieves them, but if some evil overtakes you,
they rejoice at it. But if you remain patient and become Al-Muttaqun (the
pious and righteous persons), not the least harm will their cunning do to
you. Surely, Allah surrounds all that they do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
In part 1 of this article, we defined the term Al-Wala'u wa Al-Bara' in the
Islamic Creed and exposed the rank of this great belief, guided by Ayaat 28
and 29 of Surat Al-Imran. Here we continue to examine the implications of
Al-Wala'u wa Al-Bara' and reveal the rights and dimensions of this
fundamental concept.
The Occasion of Revelation ıı
Allah warned the Muslims to guard against the hypocritical attitude of the
Jews who lived in the suburbs of Al-Madinah. The two clans, 'Aus and
Khazraj, had been on friendly terms with them from very ancient times and
kept sincere relations with them even after embracing Islam. In contrast to
this, the Jews, who had turned into the enemies of the Holy Prophet (s.a.w.)
and his Mission, could not be friendly with anyone who had joined the new
Movement. Accordingly, they kept up an outward show of friendship with the
Ansaar, but in their hearts they had become their bitter enemies. They,
however, exploited this outward friendship and tried to sow seeds of
dissension and create chaos in the Muslim community. They also tried to draw
out secrets from the Muslims and pass them on to their enemies. That is why
Allah has warned the Muslims that they should not take such people into
their confidence.
The General Meaning of the Verses ıı
In the discourse preceding these verses, Allah (s.w.t.) clearly describes
the miscreant behaviour and false arguments of the People of the Book and
how they conceal hatred to Muslims and try their best to fight them. After
this, comes the Eternal and Divine Warning; to take not those outside our
religion into our confidence by revealing our secrets to them and regarding
them as our Bitanah (advisers, consultants, protectors, helpers, friends,
etc.) since they will never miss an opportunity to exploit any of our
weakness and they ever desire our harm. We have seen and are seeing this
malice so many times from their speech, but what they conceal in their
hearts is far worse.
This Qur'anic insight into the nature of the dark souls and the hidden
feelings of our enemies, casts a light for our consciousness pertaining to
every time and place in order that we learn from these signs and become wise
and cautious in our relations with them. Yet, the people of this living
Qur'an are still in inadvertence and negligence, while their hostile enemy
continues to deceit and conspire against them during the night anday. It is
strange and ironic that we show love to people, who reject our Book and
proclaim their grievance against us!
The Rights of Al-Wala' ıı
Any Muslim who claims to have Iman must fulfil its conditions and
requirements in order to deserve that title. Undoubtedly, fulfilling the
rights of Al-Wala' (to love, support, help, follow, defend, etc. Islam and
Muslims) and fulfilling the rights of Al-Bara' (to despise, desert,
denounce, maintain innocence of and immunity from, etc. Kufr and Kuffar) is
the true manifestation of the Muslim's adherence to this Deen. The rights of
Al-Wala' towards Islam and Muslims can be concisely presented by the
following:
ıThe migration from a non-Musilm land to a Muslim land to safeguard the
Religion, with exception to those who are weak and oppressed, and those who
cannot migrate due to geographical and contemporary political reasons. Also
in strict exemption are those who migrate to a Disbelievers land to spread
Islam, seek medical treatment, business or necessary knowledge provided that
that Muslim is knowledgeable in Islam and is able to preserve his religion,
openly practice Islamic rituals without compromise and maintain the rights
of Al-Wala'u wa Al-Bara'.
ı
Supporting and helping any Muslim community, whether it is by our sayings,
souls or wealth in all matters of Deen and Dunia. Allah (s.w.t.) Says: "..
but if they seek your help in religion, it is your duty to help them except
against a people with whom you have a treaty of mutual alliance." [8:72]
ıı
Sharing the times of joy and the times of agony with other fellow Muslims.
The Prophet (s.a.w.) said: "The believers in their mutual love, are like the
human body where when the eye is in agony, the entire body feels the pain;
when the head aches, all the body will suffer." [Muslim] Showing concern in
Muslims' issues and circulating their news in the media is included in this
category.
ı
The Muslim must like for his brethren the acquiring of good and repelling of
evil, in the same way that he loves these for himself. The Prophet (s.a.w.)
said: "None amongst you (truly) believes till he loves for his brother that
which he loves for himself." [Muslim]
ı
The abstinence from abusing, mocking or backbiting other Muslims. Allah
(s.w.t.) has likened this to eating the flesh of the Muslim [49:11-12].
ıı
To belong to the Muslim Jama'a (community) in unity and to avoid division as
Allah Orders "And hold fast, all of you together, to the Rope of Allah (ie.
this Qur'an), and be not divided among yourselves." [3:103] and by the
Prophets (s.a.w) saying: "Whoever dissociates oneself from the Jama'a by the
span of the hand will die a Jahili (the age of ignorance) death."
The Rights of Al-Bara' ıı
To become a Mu'min, it is not sufficient for the Muslim to merely fulfil the
rights of Al-Wala' towards Islam and Muslims, he must also sincerely fulfil
the rights of Al-Bara' towards Kufr and Kuffar. The most important of these
rights include:
Despising Kufr (disbelief), Shirk (polytheism), and their people; and to
maintain your enmity towards them as stated in Allah's Words: "Indeed there
has been an excellent example for you in Ibrahim (Abraham) and those with
him, when they said to their people: 'Verily, we are free from you and
whatever you worship besides Allah, we have rejected you, and there has
started between us and you, hostility and hatred for ever, - until you
believe in Allah Alone'." [60:4]
Taking not the Kuffar as Awliya' (supporters, helpers, etc.), dealing with
them in affection because Allah (s.w.t.) commands: "O you who believe! Take
not my enemies and your enemies (ie. disbelievers and polytheists, etc.) as
friends, showing affection towards them." [60:1]
Migrating from their lands and not travelling to it except in necessity.
Narrated Samurah bin Jundub (r.a.a.): Allah's Messenger (s.a.w.) said:
"Anybody (from among the Muslims) who meets, gathers together, lives, and
stays (permanently) with a Mushrik (polytheist or a disbeliever in the
Oneness of Allah, etc.) and agrees to his ways, opinions, etc. and (enjoys)
his living with him (Mushrik) then he (that Muslim) is like him (Mushrik).
[Abu Dawud]
Not to imitate the Kuffar in their religious rituals or their way of life as
stated by the Prophet (s.a.w.): "Whoever imitates a (group of) people, then
that person is one of them." The Prophet (s.a.w.) taught us that: "Jews and
Christians do not dye their hair so you should do the opposite of what they
do." [Bukhari]
Avoiding their company and friendship as Stated by Allah: "And incline not
toward those who do wrong, Lest the Fire should touch you , and you have no
protectors other than Allah, nor you would then be helped." [11:113],
especially with those who mock and ridicule Islam.
In dealing with the Kuffar, no compromise in religion for the sake of
courtesy and respect should be offered. Allah (s.w.t.) Said: "They wish that
you should compromise (in religion out of courtesy) with them, so they (too)
would compromise with you." [68:9] Furthermore, the Monotheist must not ask
Allah forgiveness and mercy for the Kafir as Commanded by Allah: "It is not
(proper) for the Prophet and those who believe to ask Allah's Forgiveness
for the Mushrikun even though they may be of kin, after it has become clear
to them that they are the dwellers of the Fire (because they died in a state
of disbelief)." [9:113]
It should be remembered, that our enmity for the Kuffar as regulated by
Al-Bara' does not mean that the Muslim can be unjust and offend those Kuffar
who are not transgressors. Allah (s.w.t) Commands justice and beneficence,
"Allah does not forbid you to deal justly and kindly with those who fought n
ot against you on account of religion and did not drive you out of your
homes. Verily Allah loves those who deal with equity." [60:8] Notice that
Allah Said 'to deal justly and kindly' with them and did not Say, 'to show
them love and take them as Awliya'.
Finally, we should be amongst those who Allah Praises: "You will not find
any people who believe in Allah and the Last Day, making friendship with
those who oppose Allah and His Messenger, even though they were their
fathers, or their sons, or their brothers or their kindred (people). For
such he has written Faith in their hearts, and strengthened them with Ruh
(proofs, light and true guidance) from Himself. And We will admit them to
Gardens (Paradise) under which rivers flow, to dwell therein (forever).
Allah is pleased with them, and they with Him. They are the Party of Allah.
Verily, it is the Party of Allah that will be the successful." [58:22].
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
References:
The Meaning of the Qur'an, S.Abul A'la Al-Maududi
In the Shade of the Qur'an, Sayyid Qutb
Al-Wala'u wa Al-Bara' fil-Islam. Muhammad Al-Qahtani
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Mohamed O. Musa
As-salamu alaikum.
Br. Abdi, Alle wuxuu Qur'aanka ku yidhi, " yaa ayyuhal-ladiina aamanuu
kuunuu qawwaamiina bil-QISD, shuhadaa'a lillaahi ..." Aayad kalena " ...
walaa TABKHASUUN-naasa ashyaa'ahun ..." Rasuulkii Allena (NNKA) wuxuu
hadiith ku yidhi, "almu'minu kayyisun fatin". Jarax iyo tacdiil hortood
wax lagama maarmaan ah caqli ka fayow jenjeedh isla markaana dareensan
muhiimadda uu islaamku siiyey caddaaladda. Waxa sidoo kale lagama
maarmaan ah in ay jirto baahi keenaysa in qofka miisaan la saaro. Tusaale
ahaan haddii laga wada hadlayo qoraalladii uu ka tegay marxuumku, maxaa la
qaataa iyo maxaa laga tagaa, in miisaan sheekha la saara way iman kartaa.
Arrintanise hadda meesha ma taallo. Waxa hadda meesha taalla tacsiyad iyo
duco marxuumka loo samaynayo. Hadiithkii aad adiga naftaadu xustayna wuxuu
ina farayaa in qofka baxay wanaaggiisii la sheego. Markaa weli ma arko
waxa daruuri ka dhigay iney arrimahan meesha ku falanqeyno.
Ta wiilkan cid baa gaal ah iyo waxyaabaha la midka ah meesha la
warwareegaya, waxaad tidhi "It seems he has a cause and knowledge. But I
wonder whether some of his stands conform the right concept of alu sunnah
waljama." Does that mean you agree with his allegations against the
sheikh? If so, can you provide a proof of the validity of such
allegations? If not, what is your position with regard to his allegations?
Ammaana Allah
--
Mohamed,
Nabadgelyo.
Mohamed O. Musa
As-salamu alaikum.
The role of the believer is to worship Allah and worry for himself, not
to judge and measure the faith of other believers. The Prophet of
Allah (SAW) never did this, and therefore it is a bid'a to judge the
faith of others by guessing (suu'uz-zan) their intentions.
If you are worried by bid'a committed by others, you should look what you
are doing. What bid'a is greater in magnitude and more dangerous than
ignorantly calling people (who apparently follow the teachings of Islam)
kufar. If you care about the teachings of the prophet (SAW), you should
note that he never called someone who attests to the shahada a kafir, not
even the munafiqin. Do you realize that the munafiqun were categorized
as munafiqun but not as kuffar eventhough their actions were sometimes more
harmful to muslims than those of the kuffar? And when abou Hatib (R), a
believer, wrote to the kufar of Quraish to warn them about the muslim
army, he was never accused of kufr. If it were today, you would
certainly refuse his explanation and accuse him of collaborations with
the enemy therefore a kufr (al-walaa wal-baraa) and shoot him at the
spot simply because you do not realize the limits of Allah when it comes
to dealing with what is in the hearts of people. You forget that we can
only judge according what is obvious to us, and leave the hidden to Allah.
Finally, are you standing by your earlier allegations that Sh. Sha'rawi
has issued fatawa legalizing usury, fornication, alcohol etc? If so,
were is the proof? Are you sure you are talking about the right person?
I am waiting to hear your proofs.
May Allah guide us the right path!
--
Mohamed,
Nabadgelyo.
abdullah mohamed
the role of believer is also to kufr the tagut as allah said in surat
albaqara (fman yu'min bilaahi wayakfur bidaaquti faqad istamsaka bil curwat
alwuthqaa) and the reason i'm writing about this man is to stop people like
you spreading lies about him and the bida is to shave the breard like him
,do you think shahaadda is stamp on your back will stay with you wherever
you do !!!!go and learn nawaaqid shahada and shada it's self you ignorant
murjia
abdullah mohamed
what the sahabi hatib did (radiyalaahu canhu)was muwaala to kufar and you
can undtrestand if you read the tafsir and sahabas stand of the aya and
omar bin alkhadab,BUT HADIB (RADIYALLAHU CANHU) GET QARIINAH OR CAUSE TAKE
THE DESCRIPTION OF THE KUFR FROM HIM AND THAT WAS HE WAS BADRI AS THE
RASUL STATED DO YOU UNTRESTAND THAT.WE JUDGE PEOPLE ONLY THEIR DHAHIR AND
THE BADIN IS FOR ALLAH ,SO ANY BODY WHO DO THE KUFR WITHOUT MANIC MUCTABAR
CINDA AHLI SUNA IS KAFIR READ MOR TAWHIID ,and forget what mohamed guled
and shaaraawi teach you becase the book they learn caqiidah inazhar is book
called ( jawharat altowhid lillbeejuri) that's not aahlu suna waljama book
is the murjia faith
Mohamed O. Musa
As-salamu alaikum.
For your information I did not HEAR the name Mohamed Guled until last
year when I saw condolance statements here in the SCS. And I saw Sh.
Sha'rawi several times on TV. Each time, I had difficulty with his slang and
hardly followed what seemed otherwise interesting lectures (at least that
is what the faces of his audience conveyed). I have not learned anything
from any of them, I therefore state that your allegation (attached) is
unfounded. If you disagree, haati burhaanak!
Secondly, I have asked you earlier, and I ask you now: Where is the proof
that sh. Sha'rawi issued fatawa rendering zina, khamr and usury halal? If
you have no proof for this, possibly, you have no proof for your other
allegations. I am waiting you to bring the proof. I you don't
have one, know thatyou were wrong and repent to Allah.
When it cames information, Islam requires us to verify any news
that causes us to hold a belief that can have undesirable effects if the
news that caused it was false. Allah said in the holy Qur'an, "O you who
believe! If a wicked person comes to with any news, ascertain the
truth, lest you harm people unwittingly, and afterwards become full of
sorrow for what you have done." And in another verse Allah said, "And
pursue not that of which you have no knowledge of; for the hearing, or of
seeing, or of (feeling in) the heart will be enquired into (on the day of
judgement).
Finally, I have no interest in defending Sh. Sha'rawi (may the mercy of
Allah be upon him) other than that it is our duty to advice each other in
doing good and forbidding from each other in doing evil. As I stated
earlier, according to the Messenger of Allah, accusing a muslim of kufr
makes the accuser himself what he accuses of the other (i.e. a kafir), if
the accusation is false. So, I advise you once more to repent to Allah
and leave his servants
--
Mohamed,
Nabadgelyo.
Abdi Daud
>(Mohamed O. Musa) writes:
>
>As-salamu alaikum.
>
>Br. Abdi, Alle wuxuu Qur'aanka ku yidhi, " yaa ayyuhal-ladiina aamanuu
>kuunuu qawwaamiina bil-QISD, shuhadaa'a lillaahi ..." Aayad kalena " ...
>walaa TABKHASUUN-naasa ashyaa'ahun ..." Rasuulkii Allena (NNKA) wuxuu
>hadiith ku yidhi, "almu'minu kayyisun fatin".
Walaal waa runtaayoo waa inaynu ka caddaalad falna dhacdooyinka una diidin
dadka waxa ay shaqeysteen. Tan kale Walaal Xadiiskan waxay alu taxqiiqa
yidhaahedeen macnahiisu waa sax, sanandkiisuna ma sugna.
Jarax iyo tacdiil hortood
>wax lagama maarmaan ah caqli ka fayow jenjeedh isla markaana dareensan
>muhiimadda uu islaamku siiyey caddaaladda. Waxa sidoo kale lagama
>maarmaan ah in ay jirto baahi keenaysa in qofka miisaan la saaro. Tusaale
>ahaan haddii laga wada hadlayo qoraalladii uu ka tegay marxuumku, maxaa la
>qaataa iyo maxaa laga tagaa, in miisaan sheekha la saara way iman kartaa.
>Arrintanise hadda meesha ma taallo. Waxa hadda meesha taalla tacsiyad iyo
>duco marxuumka loo samaynayo. Hadiithkii aad adiga naftaadu xustayna wuxuu
>ina farayaa in qofka baxay wanaaggiisii la sheego. Markaa weli ma arko
>waxa daruuri ka dhigay iney arrimahan meesha ku falanqeyno.
Walaal anigu waxaan qabaa sida kale oo ah in tacsina loo diro, islamarkaana
wixii khalad ah oo muslmimiinta taabayanya ee lagu qabsadayna la sheego (u
fiirso malihi ceebaha nafta ha la sheego), Allana dembi dhaaf loo waydiiyo
guddoonka. Waxaan wehel daliil ii ah sida soo socoto, waxaa badan haddaad
akhriso kutubta ahlul cilmiga iyo sida ay isuga tacsiyeen jidheen waxaad
arkaysaa iyaga oo sheekhii u tacsiyaynayaa judhiiba oo haddana ku ladhayana
wixii khalad ah oo manhaji ah oo lagu haystay nusxal lillaahi thumma lil ummah.
Tusaale ahaan markii uu geeriyooday Ibnu Taymiyah, Xaafidh Al-Dahabi iyo
jahaabidadii kale ee uu soo saaray Sheekhu waxay markiiba u direen tacsi iyaga
oo sheegay waxay u arkayeen khaladaadka uu Shaykhul Islaam sameeyay, taasina
waxay uga gol layaheen sida la yidhi in sheegidda xaqa cidna ka waynayn geeri
iyo geeri la'aanba oo xaq qarin ka dhalaynayso haddaan markiiba la caddayn haba
koobnaato sheegiddaasi.
Ciddii doonaysa inay faafaahin iyo taxliil ku darta geerida ka dib iyadana waa
arrin u taalla ciddii doonaysa.
>Ta wiilkan cid baa gaal ah iyo waxyaabaha la midka ah meesha la
>warwareegaya, waxaad tidhi "It seems he has a cause and knowledge. But I
>wonder whether some of his stands conform the right concept of alu sunnah
>waljama." Does that mean you agree with his allegations against the
>sheikh? If so, can you provide a proof of the validity of such
>allegations? If not, what is your position with regard to his allegations?
Walaal waxaan u malaynayaa inayan kaa daahsoonayan in ereyga wanaagsan sadaqada
ka mid yahay. Ereyga ah wiil iyo wixii la mid ah waxaa wanaagsan in ahlul
cilmiga iska dhowraan ayaan qabaa. Aniga oo filaya inaan islaamiyiinta mararka
qaarkooda ugu carrab adkahayna iska saari maayo. Waayo sida muuqata waa nin
sheekha ah oo diinta wax ka yaqaanna.
Sidaan u idhiba waxaa ii muuqata markaan akhriyay maqaallaadiisa nin diintii
wax ka yaqannaa oo gaar ahaan towxiidka iyo manaasishiisa garanaya.
Islamarkaasiisa leh cause Islami ah oo ah in laga hortago dhuqaata calaamul
islami joogta sida ay qaban islamaamiyiinta oo dhan haba lagu kala
geddisnaadaan habkii iyo wadaddadii loo mari lahaa. Taasi waa taan ula jeeday
he has a cause and knowledge.
Tan kale malaha wanaagsan waxaa uu keeni lahaa inaadan isku xidhan mowqifkiisa
Shacraawi iyo hadalkayga waayo meel ay iska gaadhi karaan ayaaba iska yar
kaddib markaan qoray waxaan ka qabay sheekha.
About some of his allegations (sida khamarada, sinada iwm) uu yidhi Shacraawi
ayaa bannayeeyay waxaa loo baahan yahay dalliil ah; haddii kale waxaa uu
qaadaaya dembigooda. Sh. Shacraawi ayaa beenayay arrimahaasi weligay ma maqal
imminka ka hor. Wixii lagu diiday Shacraawi ahlu cilmiga waa ay og yihiin waana
qoran yihiin. Ninka warkan qoray ha li yimaado daliil cad ama si cad ha uga
noqdo warkaasi aanan daliilka lahayn. Haddi kale ha ogaado in islaamiyiintu
tixgelin yar u hayaan nin wax sheegay oo caddayn waayay haddana ku sii
adkaystay mowqif aanan sax ahayn.
P.s. Waxaan u haystay inuusan Somali ahayn laakin imminka markaan akhriyay
qoraalkiisa waxaa i yara galay shaki oo inuu Soomaali yahay aad mooddaysaa.
Waxaanan warkaygii hore ku dhisay isaga oo iigu jawaabay markaan waydiiyay
through email inuu Soomali yahay iyo inkale as he is Jordanian or Palestine.
Please note that.
Abdi Da'ud "Ina Da'ud"
Mohamed O. Musa
As-salamu alaikum.
Walaal Abdi, ugu horreyn su'aasha ah inaad sidaad u aragto ninkan dadka
gaalada iyo juhalada ku sheegaya waxan ku keenay sidan: Waxaad tidhi
wuxu u muuqdaa inuu cilmina leeyahay qaddiyadna u halgamayo. Waxana
jirata 1) inuu in ka badan mid ka mid maqaalladiisa si aan kala sooc lahayn
dadka meeshan wax ku qora ama akhrista ugu eedeeyey jahli (caytan aan
sabab lahayn), 2) Wuxuu la yimi been-abuurasho (buhtaan) markuu yidhi,
"Sh. Shacraawi wuxuu banneeyey ribada, khamrada iyo dhilleysiga,
3) Wuxuu yidhi, "Sh. Shacraawi wuxuu ahaa waa gaal", 4) wuxuu ku dooday
in aan sheekh Shacraawi iyo Maxamed Guuleed wax ka bartay (walawba aanu
aanu, siday u badan tahay, ogeyn meel aan adduunka kaga noolahay),
5) Wuxuu ku dooday inaan Murjia ahay dhinaca caqiidada. Ninka waxaasoo
gef ah (oo qaarkood gaalnimo keenayaan) waqti sidan u gaaban ku galey
haddaad u aragto inuu ehlul-cilmi yahay, waxan is waydiinayaa waxaad u
aragto cilmi la'aanta.
Ta kale haddii uu yahay nin qaddiyad u halgamaya, muxuu Australia u
warwareegayaa ee uu ugu tagi waayey raggan uu dhiiggooda bannaysanayo.
Waxay u badan tahay inuu meesha uu ku nool yahay ku tegay qaxootinimo,
haddii uu sharci ka qaatayna ku dhaartay inuu boqoradda England daacad u
yahay. Maye al-walaa wal baraa', mise marka dadka masaakiinta ah la
harowsanayo ayuun baa lala soo baxaa.
Ta xigta, waxaad tidhi, culimaa sidan samaysay markii ibn-Taymiya dhintay.
Anigoo anigu mar walba ku talinaya in hadiithka Rasuulku wax wal oo
kaleba ka mudan yahay, balse haddii aad mawqifkan ku adkeysanayso waxan
ku waydiinayaa kumaa taagan meesha raggan aad xustay taagnaayeen. Fulay
dhowr kun oo mayl cararay oo inta dad aan ehlul-caqiido ahayn miciin
waydiistay haddana halkaa culimada ka aflagaaddeeya ayaa ummadda rogaya.
Ugu dambeyn, walawba erayga wiil naf ahaantiisu in cid loogu yeedho aaney
waxba ku jabney, haddana haddii ay kuula muuqato inaan la noqdo, waan la
noqday.
Fii amaani Allaah.
--
Abdirashid
>
> For your information I did not HEAR the name Mohamed Guled until last
> year when I saw condolance statements here in the SCS. And I saw Sh.
> Sha'rawi several times on TV. Each time, I had difficulty with his slang and
> hardly followed what seemed otherwise interesting lectures (at least that
> is what the faces of his audience conveyed). I have not learned anything
> from any of them, I therefore state that your allegation (attached) is
> unfounded. If you disagree, haati burhaanak!
Believe me, and I hope you trust me, from the day I saw this person's writtings,
I said to my self: what a khawaarij hiding behind good Aqiida, Tawxiid or Salafi.
Regardless of his origin, those kind of people exist and call themselves Firqa
Al-Naajiya!!!. They always love to mention "FIRIQ" without knowing its
meaning. I have seen, Allah is my witness, someone (Somali) pretending to
be Sheikh using same language as this person. If you are really interested
in knowing more about them, then read small Book called: Khuduudul Cariida
Liadciyaa'i Salafiyah Jadiida.
My advice is: there is/are far more important things than wasting your time
with this person.
Abdirashid
Mohamed O. Musa
As-salamu alaikum.
Br. Abdirashid, I can hardly afford the time, but I feel that it is
necessary to question people like Abdulla Mohamed, if that is his name.
He is spreading obvious lies while pretending to be preaching the
fundamental teachings of Islam. He is confusing people by telling them
that it is okey to label people with kufr without proof. And by doing
these unacceptable things, he is giving those who are genuinely working
for the sake of Islam and muslims a very bad image.
Fee amani Allah
--
Daud7
> Abdirashid<ae...@po-box.mcgill.ca> writes:
>
>> dj...@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mohamed O. Musa) writes:
>>
>> As-salamu alaikum.
>>
>> For your information I did not HEAR the name Mohamed Guled until last
>> year when I saw condolance statements here in the SCS. And I saw Sh.
>> Sha'rawi several times on TV. Each time, I had difficulty with his slang
>and
>> hardly followed what seemed otherwise interesting lectures (at least that
>> is what the faces of his audience conveyed). I have not learned anything
>> from any of them, I therefore state that your allegation (attached) is
>> unfounded. If you disagree, haati burhaanak!
>
>Bro Mohamed,
>Believe me, and I hope you trust me, from the day I saw this person's
>writtings,
>I said to my self: what a khawaarij hiding behind good Aqiida, Tawxiid or
>Salafi.
Again bro Abdirashid,
It was very hard to the ulima to judge someone he is khawarij untill they
exhaust all islamic measures and debate with him/her with daliil.
>Regardless of his origin, those kind of people exist and call themselves
>Firqa
>Al-Naajiya!!!. They always love to mention "FIRIQ" without knowing its
>meaning. I have seen, Allah is my witness, someone (Somali) pretending to
>be Sheikh using same language as this person.
??!!!
If you are really interested
>in knowing more about them, then read small Book called: Khuduudul Cariida
>Liadciyaa'i Salafiyah Jadiida.
I thought this book was written by a Kuwaiti Salafi, Dr Abdirizak al Shaiggi
who split from those who call themselves the salifiyah al musaalimiin or
xukuumiyiin. They label him a a new Khawarij plot that undermine the power of
Amirism system in Kuwait. His book (right or wrong) was responding to some of
their allegation during/after the Gulf War. So I didn't understand why you
refer to this brother to this book!.
>My advice is: there is/are far more important things than wasting your time
>with this person.
The Somali islamist should have a nafas and sabar dhawiil between them rather
debate with those who claim they've knowledge about towxiid to create the
better understanding that non partison people like me calling for. It is far
more important than anything else as I see it.
Abdi Da'ud (Ina Da'ud
>Abdirashid
Daud7
>Abdirashid<ae...@po-box.mcgill.ca>
>
>> dj...@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mohamed O. Musa) writes:
>>
>> As-salamu alaikum.
>>
>> For your information I did not HEAR the name Mohamed Guled until last
>> year when I saw condolance statements here in the SCS. And I saw Sh.
>> Sha'rawi several times on TV. Each time, I had difficulty with his slang
>and
>> hardly followed what seemed otherwise interesting lectures (at least that
>> is what the faces of his audience conveyed). I have not learned anything
>> from any of them, I therefore state that your allegation (attached) is
>> unfounded. If you disagree, haati burhaanak!
>
>Bro Mohamed,
>Believe me, and I hope you trust me, from the day I saw this person's
>writtings,
>I said to my self: what a khawaarij hiding behind good Aqiida, Tawxiid or
>Salafi.
>Regardless of his origin, those kind of people exist and call themselves
>Firqa
>Al-Naajiya!!!. They always love to mention "FIRIQ" without knowing its
>meaning. I have seen, Allah is my witness, someone (Somali) pretending to
>be Sheikh using same language as this person. If you are really interested
>in knowing more about them, then read small Book called: Khuduudul Cariida
>Liadciyaa'i Salafiyah Jadiida.
>My advice is: there is/are far more important things than wasting your time
>with this person.
>
>Abdirashid
I've few words to say
Daud7
>dj...@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mohamed O. Musa)
Bro Mohamed,
Soon Allah willing I will post my humble answers of your querries
Abdirasid
> da...@aol.com (Daud7) writes:
> > Abdirashid<ae...@po-box.mcgill.ca> writes:
>
> It was very hard to the ulima to judge someone he is khawarij untill they
> exhaust all islamic measures and debate with him/her with daliil.
Akh Mohamed confronted him with proofs from Kitab and Sunnah.
The man continued to call the dead Sheik as Kafir, legitimized
prohibited practices (Afkeyga ma soo marin karo). Moreover,
He charged Akh mohamed as being the student of Murji'a (Non
Islamic group). Additionally, he characterized Azhar (the biggest
Islamic institution) as being Non Ahlu Sunna. And so on........
Clearly, those kind of behaviors are only possible from Khawarij
offsprings, according to basic Kutubs of Ahlu Sunnah. Therefore,
your position should be as clear and static as possible.
>> If you are really interested
>>in knowing more about them, then read small Book called: Khuduudul Cariida
>>Liadciyaa'i Salafiyah Jadiida.
> I thought this book was written by a Kuwaiti Salafi, Dr Abdirizak al Shaiggi
> who split from those who call themselves the salifiyah al musaalimiin or
> xukuumiyiin. They label him a a new Khawarij plot that undermine the power of
> Amirism system in Kuwait. His book (right or wrong) was responding to some of
> their allegation during/after the Gulf War. So I didn't understand why you
> refer to this brother to this book!.
Bro Daud, I really was not aware of this classification. The reason I referrred to
this Booklet is simple. I read the Book in 1995. The Author gave a describtion
about a group calling themselves SALAFIYIIN, who shares similarities with:
Khawaarij, Murji'a, Qudri'a, etc. Doubt it or not, like it or not, same people
exist in Somali Saxwa. That is why I referred to this Booklet.
NB: I changed the Title, because I could not debate over a
deceased Caalim.
Abdirashid
Abdi Daud
><ae...@po-box.mcgill.ca> writes:
>
>> da...@aol.com (Daud7) writes:
>> > Abdirashid<ae...@po-box.mcgill.ca> writes:
>>
>> >
>> >> dj...@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mohamed O. Musa) writes:
>> >>
>> >> As-salamu alaikum.
>> Again bro Abdirashid,
>>
>> It was very hard to the ulima to judge someone he is khawarij untill they
>> exhaust all islamic measures and debate with him/her with daliil.
>This particular man tried to spread lies from a deceased Sheik.
>Akh Mohamed confronted him with proofs from Kitab and Sunnah.
>The man continued to call the dead Sheik as Kafir, legitimized
>prohibited practices (Afkeyga ma soo marin karo).
Although I didn't red all of what this man had said, I agree with you now that
he is totally wrong to say such labels on this Sheikh.
> Moreover,
>He charged Akh mohamed as being the student of Murji'a (Non
>Islamic group).
He was wrong too to label on bro Musa as Murj'a. Equally so, it is wrong to
believe murjia is non Islamic group.
>Additionally, he characterized Azhar (the biggest
>Islamic institution) as being Non Ahlu Sunna. And so on........
?
>Clearly, those kind of behaviors are only possible from Khawarij
>offsprings, according to basic Kutubs of Ahlu Sunnah.
Bro Abdirashid you can throw your anger on anyone just he said some ideas that
may or may not conform on the principles of Khawaarij. But you and brothers
should know Ulima was always very careful to label someone any given name just
he uttered such words that look like Khawaarij words. When Mustafa Shukri the
takfiir leader in Egypt come to scholars attention and uttered all bad words
non of muslim brotherhood ulima nor other ahlul elmi stand and label on them
that they were khawaarij. Yes the heated debated with them characterized their
faults anything but khawaarij as books speaks today. I don't know what patience
and xilmi and anaa'a kills from us.
>Therefore,
>your position should be as clear and static as possible.
I don't need to repeat my position rather to rewrite what ahlul elmi said about
this case. As far as this man concern, I see that he has a cause and knowledge
but he misdirected some of his knowledge when lays where it's not suitable.
>>> If you are really interested
>>>in knowing more about them, then read small Book called: Khuduudul Cariida
>>>Liadciyaa'i Salafiyah Jadiida.
>
>> I thought this book was written by a Kuwaiti Salafi, Dr Abdirizak al
>Shaiggi
>> who split from those who call themselves the salifiyah al musaalimiin or
>> xukuumiyiin. They label him a a new Khawarij plot that undermine the power
>of
>> Amirism system in Kuwait. His book (right or wrong) was responding to
>some of
>> their allegation during/after the Gulf War. So I didn't understand why you
>> refer to this brother to this book!.
>Bro Daud, I really was not aware of this classification. The reason I
>referrred to
>this Booklet is simple. I read the Book in 1995. The Author gave a
>describtion
>about a group calling themselves SALAFIYIIN, who shares similarities with:
>Khawaarij, Murji'a, Qudri'a, etc.
No brother, the writer was talking about those who behaved like a murji'a when
American went to Saudi Arabia. If they were khawaarij then they will fight
against Fahad and his cohorts not support ths Saudi regime.
> Doubt it or not, like it or not, same
>people
>exist in Somali Saxwa. That is why I referred to this Booklet.
Bro Abdirashid, where is the cadaalatul Islam. You can disagree with any
brother as long as you've dalil and musawaq sharci but it's not right to say
that these type of brothers roam the plain of Somalia and in need to be
referred to this book which addresses a different issue that faced this man and
similars (right and wrong) in Gulf region.
>NB: I changed the Title, because I could not debate over a
>deceased Caalim.
That is good idea.
Ina Da'ud
>Abdirashid
Abdi Daud
>(Mohamed O. Musa) wrote:
>>
>>As-salamu alaikum.
>>
>>Walaal Abdi, ugu horreyn su'aasha ah inaad sidaad u aragto ninkan dadka
>>gaalada iyo juhalada ku sheegaya waxan ku keenay sidan: Waxaad tidhi
>>wuxu u muuqdaa inuu cilmina leeyahay qaddiyadna u halgamayo. Waxana
>>jirata 1) inuu in ka badan mid ka mid maqaalladiisa si aan kala sooc lahayn
>>dadka meeshan wax ku qora ama akhrista ugu eedeeyey jahli (caytan aan
>>sabab lahayn), 2) Wuxuu la yimi been-abuurasho (buhtaan) markuu yidhi,
>>"Sh. Shacraawi wuxuu banneeyey ribada, khamrada iyo dhilleysiga,
>>3) Wuxuu yidhi, "Sh. Shacraawi wuxuu ahaa waa gaal", 4) wuxuu ku dooday
>>in aan sheekh Shacraawi iyo Maxamed Guuleed wax ka bartay (walawba aanu
>>aanu, siday u badan tahay, ogeyn meel aan adduunka kaga noolahay),
>>5) Wuxuu ku dooday inaan Murjia ahay dhinaca caqiidada. Ninka waxaasoo
>>gef ah (oo qaarkood gaalnimo keenayaan) waqti sidan u gaaban ku galey
>>haddaad u aragto inuu ehlul-cilmi yahay, waxan is waydiinayaa waxaad u
>>aragto cilmi la'aanta.
Waar Shiikh Maxamadow, intii uu halkan miisay ayaan dib u akhiray, waxaan ii
soo baxay waxa caynkaasi oo gef ah ee uu ninkaasi qoray, haddana dee is diidi
mayaan inuu diinta nin wax ka yaqaano yahay. Ibnu Xajar iyo Dahabi iyo culmada
kale ee ahlul xadiiska iyaga oo diidaya raawiga ay durayaan waxay kala saari
jireen cilmigiisa iyo khaladkiisa oo waxay odhan jireen waa nin caynkaasoo
cilmi leh haddana warkiisani la qabanayn. Innaga inaynu caynkaasi noqonno maxaa
inoo diiday?
>>Ta kale haddii uu yahay nin qaddiyad u halgamaya, muxuu Australia u
>>warwareegayaa ee uu ugu tagi waayey raggan uu dhiiggooda bannaysanayo.
>>Waxay u badan tahay inuu meesha uu ku nool yahay ku tegay qaxootinimo,
>>haddii uu sharci ka qaatayna ku dhaartay inuu boqoradda England daacad u
>>yahay. Maye al-walaa wal baraa', mise marka dadka masaakiinta ah la
>>harowsanayo ayuun baa lala soo baxaa.
Bal taasna isaga iyo ciddi kale ee boqoradda ku dhaartay hala waydiiyo. Ka
hadalka iyo ra'yi dhiibashada arrimaha qaarkooda waxaan moodayay inayan cidna
meelna ugu xidhnayn , cidnana loo diidin since that person operate under the
tenent of Islam.
>>Ta xigta, waxaad tidhi, culimaa sidan samaysay markii ibn-Taymiya dhintay.
>>Anigoo anigu mar walba ku talinaya in hadiithka Rasuulku wax wal oo
>>kaleba ka mudan yahay, balse haddii aad mawqifkan ku adkeysanayso waxan
>>ku waydiinayaa kumaa taagan meesha raggan aad xustay taagnaayeen.
Waar Shiikh Maxamed, Culimada noo sidday xadiiska ayunbaa noo tebiyay
dhacdooyinkasi oo kale. They didn't operate out this xadith tenent. Haddii ayan
joogin waa inaynu ugu dhaqannaa qawaacidda sida wacan ay u isticmaali jidheen.
Haddii uu nin caynkaasoo kale ah waxa khaldana waa inaynu waddada u ifinna oo
khaladka caynkaasi ah ka saxnaa.
Fulay
>>dhowr kun oo mayl cararay oo inta dad aan ehlul-caqiido ahayn miciin
>>waydiistay haddana halkaa culimada ka aflagaaddeeya ayaa ummadda rogaya.
Waar Shiikh Maxamed, carada caynkaas ah waa tii culimada ka digtay. Tegidda iyo
ku noolashaha dalalka gaalada waa masalad ay culimo baxthi iyo daliil ku
disahay. Ninkan ceebahiisa iyo khaladkiisu saxno birifqi iyo bi-daliili.
>>Ugu dambeyn, walawba erayga wiil naf ahaantiisu in cid loogu yeedho aaney
>>waxba ku jabney, haddana haddii ay kuula muuqato inaan la noqdo, waan la
>>noqday.
Jasaakallaahu khayran, dabciddaasi wanaagsan waana midda culimada lagu yaqaan.
Ugu dambayn waan kula wadaagaya xanuunka iyo afxumada kaa soo gaadhay ninkaasi
inkasta oo aynu caynka xukunkiisu ku kala geddisan nahay. Again jazakallaahu
khayran and it time to close this chapter and move to other issues that also
matter most.
Abdi Da'ud (Ina Da'ud)
Abdirashid
> abdi...@aol.com (Abdi Daud) writes:
> Bro Abdirashid you can throw your anger on anyone just he said some ideas that
> may or may not conform on the principles of Khawaarij. But you and brothers
> should know Ulima was always very careful to label someone any given name just
> he uttered such words that look like Khawaarij words. When Mustafa Shukri the
> takfiir leader in Egypt come to scholars attention and uttered all bad words
> non of muslim brotherhood ulima nor other ahlul elmi stand and label on them
> that they were khawaarij. Yes the heated debated with them characterized their
> faults anything but khawaarij as books speaks today. I don't know what patience
> and xilmi and anaa'a kills from us.
the following Kutubs:
1) Al-Takfiir: Callama Sh. Dr. Yousuf al-Qardaawi
2) Dastuurul Wuxda (last chapter): Sh. Qazaali.
3) Qadiyatul Takfiir: Sh. Saalim Bahnasaawi.
4) Dariiqu Al-Dacwa: Sh. Mustafa Mashuur (current leader of International
Muslim brotherhood, Al-Murshid Al Caam). Just an example.
Then we will restart the discussion, Insha'allahu tacaalaa.
> I don't need to repeat my position rather to rewrite what ahlul elmi said about
> this case. As far as this man concern, I see that he has a cause and knowledge
> but he misdirected some of his knowledge when lays where it's not suitable.
My criticism was not directed to his personality. I was going after
an increasing ideology often hiding behind good Caqiida, Firqa
Naajiyah, Salafiya etc.
> No brother, the writer was talking about those who behaved like a murji'a when
> American went to Saudi Arabia. If they were khawaarij then they will fight
> against Fahad and his cohorts not support ths Saudi regime.
Bro read the Book, you will see "khawaarij macal Jamaacaat".
> Bro Abdirashid, where is the cadaalatul Islam. You can disagree with any
> brother as long as you've dalil and musawaq sharci but it's not right to say
> that these type of brothers roam the plain of Somalia and in need to be
> referred to this book which addresses a different issue that faced this man and
> similars (right and wrong) in Gulf region.
The Cadaalatul Islaam is to tell the truth. The Book I read
has nothing to do with the Gulf war you are mentioning.
And like any other credible book, it could be referrred to.
I don not understand why you are not happy with it.
> Ina Da'ud
Abdirashid
Mohamed O. Musa
As-salaamu calaykum.
Bro. Abdi, ugu horreyn, waan kugu waafaqsanahay in mowduucii inala
dheeraaday una baahan yahay in la gebagebeeyo.
Waxaad mooddaa in ay jiraan wax aan isku waafaqsannahay iyo waxyaabo aan
si kala duwan u aragno labaduba. Waxan jecelahay inaan tibaaxo inaan
diiddanahay in ninkan beenaalaha ee dadka muslimiinta ah gaaleynaya la
huwwiyo dharkii culimada oo loogu yeedho nin cilmi leh oo qaddiyad
islaami ahna u halgamaya. Haddii uu cilmi leeyahay oo waxa hadalladan ka
yeedhsiiyeyna ay ahaayeen yaqiin iyo daliil, ilama aha inuu baxsan lahaa
marka la weydiiyo daliilkiisa. Waxay u badan tahay, Eebbaa runta oge, inuu
xoogaagan uu meesha ku xarxarriiqay kutayb ka soo guuriyey ama xalaqadaha
ay takfiirinta dadka ku baraan wax ka soo dhegeystay oo inta is hayn kari
waayey meeshan kula kufay. Waxaa soo aroortay in mas'aladda ehlul-cilmigu
ugu dhowrsasho badnaayeen ahayd gaaleynta. Been sheegista iyo
been-abuurashaduna (buhtaan) waxay ka mid yihiin astaamaha nifaaqa ee ma
aha kuwa ahlul-cilmiga. Sidoo kale hubsiimo la'aantuna waxay ka mid tahay
astaamaha aqoon-darrada (jahliga) ee kama mid aha kuwa ahlul-cilmiga.
Ta kale, haddiiba nin sidan oo kale ah loogu yeedho nin cilmi leh,
miyaynaan taageero siineyn mawaaqiftiisa! Haddii dadku qaataan
mawaaqiftiisa iyagoo leh Abdi Daud baa yidhi waa nin ahlul-cilmi ah, taa
maxaan ka odhan karnaa.
Ugu dambeyn, marnaba anigu ma aan dhibsan waxyaabaha uu aniga nafteyda ku
eedeeyey, sababtoo ah qof aan sheegi karin meel aan adduunka kaga
noolahay wax aqoon ah oo uu ii leeyahay inaaney jirin ayay caddeynaysaa.
Haddii ay jireen wax aan dhibsaday, waxay ahayd halista naftiisu ku sugan
tahay. Waxan ogahay ugu yaraan saddex xadiith oo dhammaantood sheegaya
in ka wax gaaleynayaa gaalnimo ku sugan yahay haddii aan eedayntiisu sal
lahayn. Sidoo kale waxan isagana xusuustay xadiithkii ahaa, "... unsur
akhaaka daaliman aw madluuman ..."
Fii amaani Allah.
--
Abdi Daud
> Abdirashid <ae...@po-box.mcgill.ca> wrote:
>
>> abdi...@aol.com (Abdi Daud) writes:
I didn't red all of them and if I checked in my humble collection I will find
it inshaa Allah some of it. However, I didn't find an explicit label on them
the first book #2 which I red thoroughly many times. The other two books I
never red them at all. Bro you can tell me where this explicit label was given
to them in these two books.
>> I don't need to repeat my position rather to rewrite what ahlul elmi said
>about
>> this case. As far as this man concern, I see that he has a cause and
>knowledge
>> but he misdirected some of his knowledge when lays where it's not
>suitable.
>My criticism was not directed to his personality. I was going after
>an increasing ideology often hiding behind good Caqiida, Firqa
>Naajiyah, Salafiya etc.
The Somali Islamist or others that I'm reading closely for years gives us a
good glad tiding including those who embarked the spread of Caqiidah
alsalafiyah in Somali and eleswhere. They might have mistakes and short coming
like any other groups but I don't see a reason to label on them as "an
increasing ideology often hiding behind good Caqiidah".
>> No brother, the writer was talking about those who behaved like a murji'a
>when
>> American went to Saudi Arabia. If they were khawaarij then they will fight
>> against Fahad and his cohorts not support ths Saudi regime.
>
>Bro read the Book, you will see "khawaarij macal Jamaacaat".
I will read it again Allah willing and I will see whether the book was talking
about "khawaarij macal jamaacat" or salafiyah xukumiyah mabtuurah that support
everything that Fahad agreed with American's.
>> Bro Abdirashid, where is the cadaalatul Islam. You can disagree with any
>> brother as long as you've dalil and musawaq sharci but it's not right to
>say
>> that these type of brothers roam the plain of Somalia and in need to be
>> referred to this book which addresses a different issue that faced this
>man and
>> similars (right and wrong) in Gulf region.
>
>The Cadaalatul Islaam is to tell the truth. The Book I read
>has nothing to do with the Gulf war you are mentioning.
>And like any other credible book, it could be referrred to.
>I don not understand why you are not happy with it.
On the contrary, I'm happy with much of the ideas that this book carry it,
however, I'm little unhappy the disconnection I see between the message and
messenger here rather the way and the direction you took the aim of this book.
In any case, if the cadaalatul is to tell truth the truth about this book and
similars it would be the product of musaajalaat cilmiyah ( a great debate)
between the some Saudi xukuumi Salafis like M.Rabiicil Madkhali and Axraar
Salafi Kuwaitis who stood up in a rare cilimi with Safar and Salmaan Cawdah
(fakallaahum asrahum) cause in Kuwait.
>> Ina Da'ud
>Abdirashid