Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Scots 'using chip fat instead of sun cream'

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Jellore

unread,
Jul 4, 2009, 7:35:10 AM7/4/09
to
On Jul 4, 6:01 pm, HardySpicer <gyansor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 3, 10:41 pm, guig <g...@yerawathame.com> wrote:
>
> > On 2009-07-04 06:10:16 +0100, Robert Henderson
> > <phi...@anywhere.demon.co.uk> said:
>
> > > "daily telegraph
> > > Scots 'using chip fat instead of sun cream'
> > > Scots are risking skin cancer by using chip fat, moisturiser and baby
> > > oil instead of protective cream, researchers claim.
>
> > >  
>
> > And also completely untrue.
>
> I have to say that I did know somebody who used frying oil of some
> sort.
>
> Hardy

The article also adds that Scotland has higher rates of melanoma than
Australia.


Nkosi

unread,
Jul 4, 2009, 11:11:05 AM7/4/09
to

"Jellore" <jel...@bigpond.com> wrote in message
news:c0704bca-dd72-432c...@s1g2000prd.googlegroups.com...


Must have better weather then! :)

Nkosi


La N

unread,
Jul 4, 2009, 11:27:06 AM7/4/09
to

Which makes one wonder what did people do before the era of protective
creams. I am tempted to say that malignant melanoma is a "new" disease, but
I think it has been around forever; it has just only in the last century or
two that it has been identified and studied as a rather unique malignancy.

- nilita

The Phantom Piper

unread,
Jul 4, 2009, 10:44:37 PM7/4/09
to
On Jul 4, 4:35 am, Jellore <jell...@bigpond.com> wrote:
>
> The article also adds that Scotland has
> higher rates of melanoma than Australia.

Great. As I recall, Scotland led the world in death
by Cardiac Disease (deep-fried Mars Bar, anyone?)
and was a close contender (with Japan? - or was it
Russia?) in Alcoholism. Now, it's greater melanoma
rates than hot baked Australia?!


What Next?,

The Phantom Piper

Message has been deleted

Charles Ellson

unread,
Jul 5, 2009, 12:25:48 AM7/5/09
to
On Sat, 4 Jul 2009 04:35:10 -0700 (PDT), Jellore <jel...@bigpond.com>
wrote:

>On Jul 4, 6:01�pm, HardySpicer <gyansor...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Jul 3, 10:41�pm, guig <g...@yerawathame.com> wrote:
>>
>> > On 2009-07-04 06:10:16 +0100, Robert Henderson
>> > <phi...@anywhere.demon.co.uk> said:
>>
>> > > "daily telegraph
>> > > Scots 'using chip fat instead of sun cream'
>> > > Scots are risking skin cancer by using chip fat, moisturiser and baby
>> > > oil instead of protective cream, researchers claim.
>>

Ah yes, the Torygraph ! We have thoroughly rubbished their previous
"subsidy junkies" allegations so now they've dug up the "thick/dirty
Paddy" allegations from the Street of Shame's Victorian archives and
just changed the name ?
<snip>

Jellore

unread,
Jul 5, 2009, 1:34:38 AM7/5/09
to
On Jul 5, 1:11 am, "Nkosi" <Nk...@Kya.Kamina> wrote:
> "Jellore" <jell...@bigpond.com> wrote in message

What melanomas equate to better weather????

Read the bit about "binge-tanning".

Jellore

unread,
Jul 5, 2009, 1:35:50 AM7/5/09
to
On Jul 5, 12:44 pm, The Phantom Piper <ThePhantomPi...@comcast.net>
wrote:

Do not forget MS. Scotland apparently has the highest incidence in the
world, in particular the Orkneys.


La N

unread,
Jul 5, 2009, 1:38:55 AM7/5/09
to

That is true. And MS is also prevalent in a triangle in N. America that
encompasses Southern British Columbia and the Pacific Northwest of
Washington State.

- nilita


The Phantom Piper

unread,
Jul 5, 2009, 4:25:46 AM7/5/09
to
On Jul 4, 10:35 pm, Jellore <jell...@bigpond.com> wrote:
>
> Do not forget MS. Scotland apparently has the highest
> incidence in the world, in particular the Orkneys.

Microsoft has purchased the Orkneys?!


Gobsmacked,

The Phantom Piper

The Phantom Piper

unread,
Jul 5, 2009, 4:27:31 AM7/5/09
to
On Jul 4, 10:38 pm, "La N" <nilita2004NOS...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> That is true.  And MS is also prevalent in a triangle in N. America that
> encompasses Southern British Columbia and the Pacific Northwest of
> Washington State.

Well, they're headquartered in Redmond, WA, after all...


Not Terribly Surprised,

The Phantom Piper

La N

unread,
Jul 5, 2009, 11:15:31 AM7/5/09
to

The (former) Hanford nuclear site has been implicated.

- nilita


The Phantom Piper

unread,
Jul 5, 2009, 5:06:53 PM7/5/09
to
On Jul 5, 8:15 am, "La N" <nilita2004NOS...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> The (former) Hanford nuclear site has been implicated.

<*Sigh*>


Never Mind...,

The Phantom Piper

0 new messages