THE HOLOHOAX SHAKEDOWN/EXTORTION
Mixmaster
wrote:
>American Dissident Voices Broadcast of January 2, 1999
>The Holocaust Shakedown
>by Dr. William Pierce
>Imagine that a robber walks into a bank, points a pistol at a teller,
>hands her a bag, and demands that she put all the money from her cash
>drawer in it. At first she protests, but then, after he threatens to
>shoot, she fills the robber's bag with cash. And then imagine that,
as
>the robber walks out of the bank with his bag of loot, the bank guard
>opens the door for him, smiles at him, offers to hail a cab for him,
and
>tells him to come again soon. After that it's not difficult to
imagine
>that he probably will.
>That's about the way it's been with the Jews recently. Two years ago
>they put a gun to the head of the Swiss people collectively and
demanded
>billions of dollars in reparations for Swiss bank accounts they
claimed
>had been owned by Jews who disappeared during the Second World War.
The
>Swiss initially protested that unclaimed Jewish bank accounts from
the
>1930s and 1940s amounted at most to a few million dollars, not to
>billions, and besides the war ended more than 50 years ago and claims
>should have been filed long ago. The Jews threatened to shoot,
>figuratively speaking, by having their bought politicians in the
United
>States prevent Swiss banks from doing business in America. Eventually
>they walked away with $1.25 billion in loot, with the Swiss
apologizing
>for not having coughed it up sooner.
>After that sort of success with the Swiss one could hardly expect the
>Jews to give up extortion and go straight. So anyway, they were back
>again soon, with demands against the Volkswagen Company for having
used
>Jewish workers during the Second World War and providing them only
with
>room and board but not paying them union-scale wages. One might think
>that these Jewish workers would be grateful to Volkswagen for keeping
>them alive during the war, feeding them, and giving them a roof over
>their heads, when so many German civilians had only bombed-out ruins
to
>live in. Well, if you thought that, you just don't understand Jews.
The
>Jews told the Volkswagen Company that if it ever wanted to sell any
more
>cars in America, it had better cough up -- soon. And the bought
>politicians and the media bosses in America began rattling their
sabres
>and talking loudly about sanctions of various sorts against
Volkswagen.
>And so, like the Swiss banks, Volkswagen coughed up the money.
>Then the feeding frenzy started, just as I told you it would two
years
>ago, when I predicted that after the Jews had cleaned out the Swiss
they
>would go after other victims in a long list. Volkswagen wasn't the
only
>company which had used involuntary labor during the war. The Jews
went
>after Daimler-Benz and BMW and Siemens.
>And Switzerland wasn't the only country where Jews could claim that
>Uncle Abe had stashed some of his loot sixty years ago, before the
war.
>So they sued banks in France and in Britain and began moaning and
>whining in the media that the banks were being "insensitive" to poor,
>deserving "Holocaust survivors," who suddenly had remembered Uncle
Abe's
>millions and needed it -- now! And then they remembered the insurance
>companies in Italy and Switzerland and Britain and elsewhere from
whom
>they could claim that Uncle Abe once had had a life-insurance policy.
>Then they remembered that the Swedes owed them gold, and the Danes
and
>the Norwegians. Even the Poles, whom the Jews had ruled as Bolshevik
>commissars for nearly 50 years after the war, owed them, they
claimed.
>The racket has worked the same in every case: pay us, or we will have
>our bought Gentile politicians pass laws making it impossible for you
to
>continue doing business, and our people in the media will paint you
as
>monsters who want to hang onto the profit you made when poor Uncle
Abe
>and Aunt Sara were crammed into gas chambers, and then the gullible
>Gentile lemmings won't buy your products. If you give us any trouble
or
>resist our demands we'll make an example of you, the way we did with
the
>Swiss banks. Just pay us the few hundred million dollars we're
demanding
>now, and we'll leave you alone. Otherwise, it'll end up costing you a
>lot more.
>And it has worked every time. Not one banker or businessman has stood
up
>to them and flatly refused to pay. Not one president or prime
minister
>has said to them, "All right, Jew boys! You try a boycott against my
>country, and we'll organize a boycott against Israel. We'll round up
all
>the Jews in our country and send them packing." Not one has called
the
>Jews' bluff. They've all calculated that it is cheaper to pay the
>gangsters than to fight them, and so they pay. Honor means nothing to
>these businessmen and politicians. Principles mean nothing to them.
All
>they care about is continuing to make money, continuing to stay in
>office.
>With this sort of attitude predominant among the Gentiles, one can
>hardly blame the Jews for turning to extortion on a larger scale than
>ever before. They are successful at it; therefore they continue to do
>it. And they don't limit themselves to Europe or to those who
allegedly
>cooperated with the Germans in their demand for reparations. A few
>months ago they filed a claim against Britain for $600 million they
>claim the British government confiscated from Jews between 1940 and
1942
>when the British governed Palestine. Remember, the Jews were waging a
>guerrilla war against the British prior to 1948, when the British
>finally gave up and pulled out, letting the Jews slaughter the
>Palestinians and establish the Jewish state of Israel on Palestinian
>land. The Jews were kidnapping and murdering British soldiers in
>Palestine and assassinating diplomats. In 1946 the Jews used a
terrorist
>bomb to blow up the King David Hotel in Jerusalem, which was the
British
>government headquarters. This Jewish forerunner of the Oklahoma City
>bombing killed a large number of British civilians and military
people.
>And now the Jews are demanding $600 million in reparations from the
>British!
>And of course, the Jews also are expecting payoffs from American
>companies. Both Ford and General Motors had subsidiaries working in
>Germany when the Second World War began. The Ford plant in Germany
made
>military vehicles for the Germans throughout the war, and the General
>Motors subsidiary, Opel, did the same. And so now the Jews are
claiming
>that both Ford and General Motors owe them a great deal of money
because
>of that. The Jews already have filed a class-action suit against Ford
in
>a Federal court in New Jersey, seeking hundreds of millions of
dollars
>in wages plus interest for Jews who worked in Ford's German plant
during
>the war. And because the businessmen who run Ford and General Motors
>today are the same sort as those who run the Volkswagen Company, they
>undoubtedly will pay off the Jews rather than risk having the media
>portray them as "insensitive" types who profited from the so-called
>"Holocaust" and now refuse to share their loot with the poor,
deserving
>Jewish "survivors." Two hundred years ago the American motto was,
>"Millions for defense, but not one cent for tribute." But in those
days
>Americans were made of sterner stuff -- and I assume that our people
in
>Europe were too.
>Cash isn't the only thing the Jews are going after. They have decided
>that a substantial portion of the art treasures of Europe really
>belonged to Uncle Abe too 60 years ago and ought to be returned to
the
>Jews now. It is true, of course, that during the war the German
>government had a keen interest in bringing as much Germanic art as
>possible back under German protection. They bought all the Vermeers
and
>Rembrandts and Holbeins and Dürers and Halses and other Germanic art
>works as they could from owners in the conquered countries and
brought
>them back to Germany. And when the works the Germans were interested
in
>were in the hands of Jews, they often brought pressure to bear and
>obtained the works at low prices. The Germans, however, generally
>weren't interested in modern art -- certainly not in Jewish paintings
by
>Chagall or Modigliani, for example -- and a great many such modern
>paintings ended up in the hands of Jewish art dealers. In fact, the
>Germans often had agreements with Jewish art dealers, swapping the
>modern paintings they weren't interested in for the Germanic
paintings
>they were interested in. The biggest of these Jewish dealers, Georges
>Wildenstein, was in Paris, and he acquired an enormous number of
modern
>paintings during the war. After the war he brought them to New York
and
>later sold hundreds of them to museums and private collectors around
the
>world. The Jews currently are engaged in a huge treasure hunt for
those
>paintings now in Gentile hands which formerly belonged to Jews. The
>facts that most of these paintings were acquired by their present
owners
>from Jewish dealers such as the Wildensteins and that many of them
were
>legally purchased from their Jewish owners during the war are glossed
>over. All of these paintings are characterized by the Jews as --
quote
>-- "art stolen from victims of the Holocaust by the Nazis," -- end
quote
>-- and they want it all back now.
>There's an interesting double standard here. A messy divorce in the
>Wildenstein family attracted public attention last year to the Jewish
>family's business dealings in Paris during the war, and another
Jewish
>family claimed that the Wildensteins have artworks that actually
should
>be returned to them, because they were forced to sell them at fire-
sale
>prices during the war. The Wildensteins told them to buzz off: the
>statute of limitations for such claims expired long ago, the
>Wildensteins asserted. Of course, no Gentile owner dares make such an
>assertion. But in fact, there are statutes of limitations for most
>claims. Dormant bank accounts typically become the property of the
>government after being unclaimed for 20 years or so, but when the
Swiss
>brought up that legality two years ago, the Jews went into their
>"persecuted victim" act, feigning outrage that the Swiss should try
to
>let a mere law stand between the Jews and what they were claiming in
>reparations.
>Whenever the Jews, in order to remind the world for the six-millionth
>time of their "victim" status, have accused some elderly German or
Pole
>or Ukrainian or Lithuanian of having mistreated Jews 55 years ago
during
>the war, there is no question of a statute of limitations. If anyone
>mentions that legality, Jewish shrieking in all of their media
quickly
>drowns him out. For an injury, real or imaginary, done to a Jew by a
>Gentile there is no statute of limitations, no matter how much time
has
>passed. The Jews still celebrate every year in their Purim festival
the
>revenge their ancestors took on the ancient Persians 2,500 years ago
>through their control of a corrupt king.
>Yet when the Polish government asked the government of Israel a few
>months ago to extradite a Jewish mass murderer, Solomon Morel, so
that
>he could be tried in Poland for genocide, the Jews refused.
>"There's a statute of limitations for extradition," the Israelis told
the Poles,
>"and you're too late." Morel was the Jew-communist commissar of a
>concentration camp in Poland after the war, and he had tortured
hundreds
>of Poles and Germans to death. When he saw the possibility of
>retribution looming, Morel, like thousands of other Jewish criminals
>before him, fled to Israel. The horrifying atrocities committed by
>Solomon Morel have been described in the 1993 book An Eye for an Eye
by
>John Sack.
>This same double standard applies to every sort of interaction
between
>Jews and non-Jews. It is a fact that in wars people suffer losses.
>Usually, within a few years after the wars are over, people try to
get
>on with their lives, and they consider what is past to be past. If
other
>people behaved the way the Jews behave, then every Englishman whose
>family residence got hit by a bomb during the "blitz" of the Second
>World War would be clamoring now for the German government to
reimburse
>him for the repairs that his grandparents had to make 55 years ago --
>plus interest, of course. And if it's all right to go back 55 years
for
>claims, why not go back 135 years and let all of the Americans whose
>ancestors' homes and farms in Georgia were burned by General Sherman
>collect damages from the U.S. government now -- plus interest, of
>course? Or why not go back 220 years and demand that Tony Blair's
>government pay reparations to all of those Americans whose ancestors
>suffered property loss from the Redcoats during the First American
>Revolution -- plus interest, of course? I mean, if the Jews are
allowed
>to keep score, without regard for time, why shouldn't everyone else?
Why
>not set up some sort of World Court for Reparations? I imagine that
>there are a lot of Palestinians who would like to file claims against
>the state of Israel.
>The fact is that we would have international chaos if everybody
behaved
>the way the Jews do. So this raises two interesting questions: Why do
>the Jews behave the way they do? And why do we let them get away with
>it?
>Well, I've already given an answer of a sort to the first question:
the
>Jews behave the way they do because we let them behave that way; it's
>just like the case of the bank robber, who will keep coming back
until
>the bank guard stops being nice and shoots the robber. But there's
>really more to it than that. No one else is even inclined to make the
>sort of demands on the rest of the world that the Jews do. The Jews
>really are different. Their religion provides a few clues in this
>regard. It is a religion which tells them that all the property of
the
>Gentiles really should belong to Jews, that the Jews are entitled to
it.
>It's as blatant as anywhere in the 60th chapter of the book
attributed
>to their prophet Isaiah, where they are told to keep their gates open
>all the time, so that all the wealth of the Gentiles can be brought
to
>them.
>"Thou shalt suck the milk of the Gentiles," the Jews are told. And
>if you think that doesn't really mean what it sounds like it means,
you
>should look into the Talmud, where the Jewish sages, the Jewish
>interpreters of the Bible, explain to the rest of the Jews what it
>means.
>The Talmud tells the Jews that only Jews are human beings, that
>the Gentiles are just animals created by the Jewish tribal god Yahweh
to
>be used by the Jews, like other animals are used. Because Gentiles
are
>merely animals, they can't really own anything, and it is the duty of
>the Jews to make sure they don't.
>Now all of this Biblical stuff and Talmudic stuff is very old and
quaint
>and might seem irrelevant to a lawsuit against the Ford Motor Company
by
>the Jews today. But this old and quaint stuff is the basis of the
Jews'
>religion today. The religious Jews really believe it. And the
>non-religious Jews, the atheist Jews, behave as if they believe it.
And
>I think that in a certain sense they do. I think this belief is in
their
>blood. I think that this is what accounts for their almost incredible
>arrogance in their dealings with non-Jews.
>And of course, there's not just belief: there's also calculation.
They
>understand that the success of their current effort to swindle the
rest
>of the world out of every cent they can depends on three factors: it
>depends on their control of the mass media; it depends on the
>unprecedented degree of political corruption which exists almost
>everywhere in the Western world, on the unprecedented degree of
>democracy; and it depends on the confused and demoralized state of
>Gentiles everywhere.
>There never before has been a time when the Jews have wielded as much
>open power as they do today. No previous government in the United
States
>has had as many Jews in positions of power as the present Clinton
>government. And that's pretty much the way it is everywhere in Europe
>too. The Jews around Clinton are mirrored by high-ranking Jews around
>Tony Blair in Britain. In Russia, the Jews not only hold most of the
key
>posts around the alcoholic and ailing Boris Yeltsin, they have one of
>their own as prime minister. And nearly everywhere except in the
United
>States the Jews have succeeded in having laws passed making it
illegal
>for a patriot to tell his countrymen what the Jews are up to. In
>Britain, in France, and in Germany hundreds of patriots are rotting
in
>prisons today because they dared to speak the truth about the Jews.
In
>Switzerland the Jews succeeded in having similar laws passed before
they
>began extorting money from the Swiss. Only in Russia today are any
>significant number of patriots speaking out against the Jews and
daring
>the government to try to silence them.
>And I suppose it seems reasonable to the Jews that when they have so
>much power they should use it to their advantage. They should go for
>everything they can get. The opportunity may pass. And they are going
>for it, everywhere and in every way. It's interesting to note that
this
>display of unbridled greed and arrogance has made even some of their
>fellow Jews a little nervous. Charles Krauthammer, a Jewish writer
for
>the Washington Post, the second most powerful Jewish newspaper in the
>United States, wrote a column last month which begins with the words,
>and I quote: "The pursuit of billions in Holocaust guilt money has
gone
>from the unseemly to the disgraceful." -- end quote -- Krauthammer
>refers to the whole racket as a "Holocaust shakedown." It's not that
>Krauthammer doesn't think the Jews should have all the money they can
>get from the Gentiles. It's just that he's appalled by the reckless
>display of naked, unprincipled greed as more and more Jewish shysters --
>that's what Krauthammer calls them -- trample each other in their
>current feeding frenzy. What if the Gentiles notice? What will the
>Gentiles think?
>Now, the unfortunate fact is that no non-Jewish writer for a major
>newspaper would dare to write what Krauthammer wrote. Not even in the
>United States, where it's still legal to write such things. They're
all
>afraid. For two generations the Jewish media have conditioned them by
>instantly and loudly accusing anyone who opens his mouth of being a
>"racist" or a "hater" or an "anti-Semite." They've been conditioned
to
>run for cover whenever they hear one of those accusations. And that
is
>the answer to our second question, why do we let them get away with
it?
>Their media control keeps the couch potatoes confused and unaware;
the
>corrupt politicians who have come to characterize our democracy are
>always ready to front for them and betray the people whose interests
>they are supposed to be representing; and those among us who are
>perceptive enough and independent-minded enough to understand what is
>happening are nearly all too cowardly to speak out. So it is easy
enough
>for me to predict that the Jews will keep coming back for more -- and
>more -- and more -- until they either have it all, as in Russia
today,
>or what Charles Krauthammer is concerned about happens, and the
Gentiles
>notice. But really, the former outcome is much more likely.
>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>For further reading:
>John Sack, An Eye for an Eye (Harper-Collins, 1993)
>Isaiah, chapter 60
>Charles Krauthammer, "Holocaust Shakedown Is Disgraceful," Washington
>Post, December 7, 1998
>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
reposted by: kenars...@zhid.fags.R.us.88
Gruber
Mixmaster <mixm...@remail.obscura.com> wrote:
>http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/people/g/grosvenor-william/
--
The Nizkor Project-----------------------http://www.nizkor.org
Ken McVay, Director: http://www.nizkor.org/~kmcvay
The Eichmann Judgment
http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/e/eichmann.adolf/transcripts