Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

death of an idiot (Re: Otto Vass, dead at 55)

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Fredy

unread,
Aug 14, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/14/00
to
Stephen Dancs wrote:

> Otto Vass died during a violent police takedown ...

> I'm sure he must have told one of the police man to suck his dick and mind
> his own bloody business

That would only show what an idiot he was and therefore had it coming.
And of course you are the other idiot in this stupid story.


Aschiuta

unread,
Aug 14, 2000, 11:08:45 PM8/14/00
to


And you are the third one!

iceman666

unread,
Aug 15, 2000, 2:06:40 AM8/15/00
to

Aschiuta <asch...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20000814230845...@nso-fb.aol.com...

Creative Intelligence Agency

unread,
Aug 15, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/15/00
to
Fredy <a...@jps.net> wrote in message news:3998B2A6...@jps.net...

| Stephen Dancs wrote:
| > Otto Vass died during a violent police takedown ...
| > I'm sure he must have told one of the police man to suck his dick and
mind
| > his own bloody business
|
| That would only show what an idiot he was and therefore had it coming.

Very good Fredy. I see you believe in murder if the wrong opinion is voiced.
Stalin was of the same ilk as you.

Fredy

unread,
Aug 15, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/15/00
to
Creative Intelligence Agency wrote:

> | That would only show what an idiot he was and therefore had it coming.
>
> Very good Fredy. I see you believe in murder if the wrong opinion is voiced.
> Stalin was of the same ilk as you.

That you are a fucking idiot is nothing new.
What made you draw the conclusion that I believe in murder?
I believe in self-preservation.

Aschiuta

unread,
Aug 15, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/15/00
to

In article <39995258...@jps.net>, Fredy wrote:

>That you are a fucking idiot is nothing new.
>What made you draw the conclusion that I believe in murder?
>I believe in self-preservation.

Ti-ai bagat preputzul in formol?
Ce neamuri dom'le, astia nu arunca nimic de zgarciti ce sunt!

Aschiuta

unread,
Aug 15, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/15/00
to
Hai sa ne luam de mana, vrei?


Creative Intelligence Agency

unread,
Aug 15, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/15/00
to
Fredy <a...@jps.net> wrote in message news:39995258...@jps.net...
| Creative Intelligence Agency wrote:
| > Fredy <a...@jps.net> wrote

| > | Stephen Dancs wrote:
| > | >I'm sure he must have told one of the police man to suck his dick and
mind
| > | >his own bloody business
| > |
| > | That would only show what an idiot he was and therefore had it coming.
| >
| > Very good Fredy. I see you believe in murder if the wrong opinion is
voiced.
| > Stalin was of the same ilk as you.
|
| What made you draw the conclusion that I believe in murder?
| I believe in self-preservation.

You asserted that the police had a right to give him what he had coming for
the sole reason of telling a policeman "to suck his dick and mind his own
bloody business". There is nothing about "self-preservation" involved about
that. What conclusion would you draw about your assertion that he "had it
coming." What was that? Why, death of course. Consequently you believe in
killing someone for voicing "to suck his dick and mind his own bloody
business."


Creative Intelligence Agency

unread,
Aug 15, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/15/00
to
Aschiuta <asch...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20000815134633...@nso-fw.aol.com...

| In article <39995258...@jps.net>, Fredy wrote:
| >That you are a fucking idiot is nothing new.
| >What made you draw the conclusion that I believe in murder?
| >I believe in self-preservation.
|
| Ti-ai bagat preputzul in formol?
| Ce neamuri dom'le, astia nu arunca nimic de zgarciti ce sunt!

Fredy believes that the police have a right to kill someone if that someone
tells them to suck his dick & mind their own business. That is all it takes,
in Fredy's opinion.

Stephen Dancs

unread,
Aug 15, 2000, 9:29:41 PM8/15/00
to
"Creative Intelligence Agency" (poet...@idirect.thebigborg) writes:
>
>Fredy believes that the police have a right to kill someone if that
>someone tells them to suck his dick & mind their own business. That is all
>it takes, in Fredy's opinion.

I think it's time to giv'm somethin' way beyond George Carlin's seven
banned words:

Supreme Court decision in the 1974 George Carlin "Seven Dirty Words" case,
FCC v. Pacifica Foundation (the original Carlin monologue that was the
subject of the case was actually called "Seven Words You Can Never Say on
Television".) This decision established indecency regulation in
broadcasting, and for over two decades has established the FCC as the
largest censorship body in the world. This case is essentially one of the
forebears of the "Communications Decency Act".
ref.: http://www.eff.org/pub/Legal/Cases/FCC_v_Pacifica/

The original seven words were, shit, piss, fuck, cunt, cocksucker,
mother-fucker, and tits.
ref.: http://www.eff.org/pub/Legal/Cases/FCC_v_Pacifica/fcc_v_pacifica.decision


so here it goes:

http://georgecarlin.com

(NOTE: Answers to this posting will be monitored mainly on the
"soc.culture.romanian" newsgroup.)

--=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*
Stephen Dancs http://come.to/sdancs Voicemail: +1 (416) 760-5885
bv...@ncf.ca Fax: +1 (240) 250-1108
http://www.ncf.ca/~bv561/ Toll-free: 1-888-700-YUGO x NICA

Aschiuta

unread,
Aug 15, 2000, 11:39:38 PM8/15/00
to

In article <oGkm5.22020$N47.2...@quark.idirect.com>, "Creative wrote:

>Fredy believes that the police have a right to kill someone if that someone
>tells them to suck his dick & mind their own business. That is all it takes,
>in Fredy's opinion.


Did you hear that Fredy? Suck my aschie and mind your own business!

iceman666

unread,
Aug 16, 2000, 2:14:57 AM8/16/00
to

Aschiuta <asch...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20000815134635...@nso-fw.aol.com...

Jorj

unread,
Aug 16, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/16/00
to
Dom' Inghetata, matale esti oglinda lui Aschiuta? El ti-a propus sa vi-o
luati in mina, si matale ce parere ai?! Daca esti de acord clipeste de doua
ori. Daca nu, clipeste odata. Daca nu esti sigur, clipeste de cinci ori.
Pentru directory assistance, si ca sa vorbesti cu portaru' clipeste de opt
ori.
In general poti sa clipesti in continuu. Spor la clipeala(!).

iceman666 <icem...@screaming.net> wrote in message
news:399a...@news.server.worldonline.co.uk...

Bula 00001

unread,
Aug 18, 2000, 9:45:08 PM8/18/00
to
Shit Marqizuli iear mai lamurit ca Io tomnai intzelesesem ca Aschios iea oferit
mana si cat paci sa mor da oftica individioasa :))

Elizabeth Golemme

unread,
Sep 23, 2000, 3:00:00 AM9/23/00
to
This whole situation is unfortunate. Police have guidelines that they have to
follow
when they arrest a person if they are drunk and disorderly, or if they are on
medication or drugs or if they are mentally ill. A well trained police officer
does not beat to death anyone who makes comments he does not like during an
arrest.And police are not above the law to kill anyone simply because they do
not like what he said or did.And to say that the Mr.Vass in question somehow
DESERVED to be beaten to death is no more deserving that a high school student
taking a knife and stabbing another student because they cut in front of the
line while returning books which happened in my sons school just last week.With
assumptions like the writer wrote that the victim somehow deserved to be killed
for pissing off the officers in question...makes anyone fear for their lives in
Toronto. God forbid that you should get a ticket and the policeman who stopped
you did not like your face or your nationality, or race and decided to beat you
to death with impunity.To me it seems a bit strange that it took six young
healthy and obviously in good physical condition police officers to subdue one
erratic mentally ill or possibly suffering from a medical condition (diabetics
often exhibit drunken behavior before lapsing into a diabetic coma unless help
is given) elderly gentleman is very strange indeed.I am sure that there is more
to this story from both sides, but whatever the case if this gentleman was not
of Hungarian origin no mention of him would be in this newsgroup.
Liza

Fredy wrote:

> Stephen Dancs wrote:
>
> > Otto Vass died during a violent police takedown ...
>

> > I'm sure he must have told one of the police man to suck his dick and mind
> > his own bloody business
>
> That would only show what an idiot he was and therefore had it coming.

Elizabeth Golemme

unread,
Sep 23, 2000, 8:13:42 PM9/23/00
to
The police do not have a right to beat anyone to death for a remark they did not
like. If Fredy tells anyone to go to hell or makes a remark they do not like
then do they have the right to kill him? Is that self preservation?Or if he cuts
someone off in traffic does that person have a right to kill him because they
did not like what he did? Is that also self preservation?If in the same
situation it happened to be his teenage son who mouthed off a police officer do
they have the right to beat him to death? Would that be self preservation?
I was under the misconception that self preservation had to do with fear of your
life in a life and death situation, which in the case of Mr.Vass it was perhaps
the reverse. Using Fredy's logic then Mr. Vass had the right to beat the police
officers to death as they were forcibly detaining him against HIS will.

What has happened in Mr.Vass's situation is happening all to frequently and
policemen should not be above the law if they are responsible for wrongfully
inflicting death. And I question the mental state of any officer who would beat
a citizen to death for voicing their opinions about anything. The first place I
would look at is the police department and their policies. Police are public
servants they are not automatically above the law. If for any reason Fredy
called a policeman a pig to his face in anger or whatever, maybe getting a
ticket he did not feel he deserved...would that police office have a right to
take his gun out and shoot him in the face....as a self preservation for having
his feelings hurt by someone calling him names??
Get real here Fredy...or else stay home out of the public eye as anyone can take
anything you say as a threat to THEIR self-preservation.....and might think YOU
would have it coming to you also.And I am sure there are quite a few nuts on the
internet who might take offense at you for YOUR opinions. It happens everyday,
just as it did to the newspaper columnist a week ago for daring to print the
truth someone did not like...and decide it was in their self preserving interest
to shoot the poor man in the back. Comments such as yours were not thought out
but a knee jerk reaction to a situation you know nothing about personally.I am
confident that during the course of your life you might have said or voiced your
opinions and even made a few remarks in anger....what if someone beat you to
death for that? Would it be then acceptable and deemed SELF-preservation, or
should it have been EGOpreservation.?Whatever the reason murdering someone or
beating them to death for a comment or insult is not how civilized people behave
and those who condone such barbaric attitudes should be kept a close eye on for
who know what they are capable of in a similar situation.
Liza

Creative Intelligence Agency wrote:

> Fredy <a...@jps.net> wrote in message news:39995258...@jps.net...
> | Creative Intelligence Agency wrote:
> | > Fredy <a...@jps.net> wrote
> | > | Stephen Dancs wrote:

> | > | >I'm sure he must have told one of the police man to suck his dick and
> mind
> | > | >his own bloody business
> | > |
> | > | That would only show what an idiot he was and therefore had it coming.
> | >

> | > Very good Fredy. I see you believe in murder if the wrong opinion is
> voiced.
> | > Stalin was of the same ilk as you.
> |

> | What made you draw the conclusion that I believe in murder?
> | I believe in self-preservation.

>


> You asserted that the police had a right to give him what he had coming for
> the sole reason of telling a policeman "to suck his dick and mind his own
> bloody business". There is nothing about "self-preservation" involved about
> that. What conclusion would you draw about your assertion that he "had it
> coming." What was that? Why, death of course. Consequently you believe in

> killing someone for voicing "to suck his dick and mind his own bloody
> business."

Elizabeth Golemme

unread,
Sep 23, 2000, 8:30:16 PM9/23/00
to
Obviously those same judges havent listened to the music our youth listen to today.
Or played video games like Kingpin etc. or rented any movies lately.Saying such
comments as suck anything might make a nun blush but I doubt if it would enrage all
those policemen to beat the crap out of anyone...they've probably heard worse. There
is more to this situation than all this speculation of cause and effect, and more as
an alert to social behavior and what is acceptable and accountable and what is not.If
Mr. Vass was black everyone would say it was racially motivated etc.and if that were
the case what would have been Fredy's comment?
0 new messages