> Otto Vass died during a violent police takedown ...
> I'm sure he must have told one of the police man to suck his dick and mind
> his own bloody business
That would only show what an idiot he was and therefore had it coming.
And of course you are the other idiot in this stupid story.
And you are the third one!
Very good Fredy. I see you believe in murder if the wrong opinion is voiced.
Stalin was of the same ilk as you.
> | That would only show what an idiot he was and therefore had it coming.
>
> Very good Fredy. I see you believe in murder if the wrong opinion is voiced.
> Stalin was of the same ilk as you.
That you are a fucking idiot is nothing new.
What made you draw the conclusion that I believe in murder?
I believe in self-preservation.
>That you are a fucking idiot is nothing new.
>What made you draw the conclusion that I believe in murder?
>I believe in self-preservation.
Ti-ai bagat preputzul in formol?
Ce neamuri dom'le, astia nu arunca nimic de zgarciti ce sunt!
You asserted that the police had a right to give him what he had coming for
the sole reason of telling a policeman "to suck his dick and mind his own
bloody business". There is nothing about "self-preservation" involved about
that. What conclusion would you draw about your assertion that he "had it
coming." What was that? Why, death of course. Consequently you believe in
killing someone for voicing "to suck his dick and mind his own bloody
business."
Fredy believes that the police have a right to kill someone if that someone
tells them to suck his dick & mind their own business. That is all it takes,
in Fredy's opinion.
I think it's time to giv'm somethin' way beyond George Carlin's seven
banned words:
Supreme Court decision in the 1974 George Carlin "Seven Dirty Words" case,
FCC v. Pacifica Foundation (the original Carlin monologue that was the
subject of the case was actually called "Seven Words You Can Never Say on
Television".) This decision established indecency regulation in
broadcasting, and for over two decades has established the FCC as the
largest censorship body in the world. This case is essentially one of the
forebears of the "Communications Decency Act".
ref.: http://www.eff.org/pub/Legal/Cases/FCC_v_Pacifica/
The original seven words were, shit, piss, fuck, cunt, cocksucker,
mother-fucker, and tits.
ref.: http://www.eff.org/pub/Legal/Cases/FCC_v_Pacifica/fcc_v_pacifica.decision
so here it goes:
(NOTE: Answers to this posting will be monitored mainly on the
"soc.culture.romanian" newsgroup.)
--=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*
Stephen Dancs http://come.to/sdancs Voicemail: +1 (416) 760-5885
bv...@ncf.ca Fax: +1 (240) 250-1108
http://www.ncf.ca/~bv561/ Toll-free: 1-888-700-YUGO x NICA
>Fredy believes that the police have a right to kill someone if that someone
>tells them to suck his dick & mind their own business. That is all it takes,
>in Fredy's opinion.
Did you hear that Fredy? Suck my aschie and mind your own business!
iceman666 <icem...@screaming.net> wrote in message
news:399a...@news.server.worldonline.co.uk...
Fredy wrote:
> Stephen Dancs wrote:
>
> > Otto Vass died during a violent police takedown ...
>
> > I'm sure he must have told one of the police man to suck his dick and mind
> > his own bloody business
>
> That would only show what an idiot he was and therefore had it coming.
What has happened in Mr.Vass's situation is happening all to frequently and
policemen should not be above the law if they are responsible for wrongfully
inflicting death. And I question the mental state of any officer who would beat
a citizen to death for voicing their opinions about anything. The first place I
would look at is the police department and their policies. Police are public
servants they are not automatically above the law. If for any reason Fredy
called a policeman a pig to his face in anger or whatever, maybe getting a
ticket he did not feel he deserved...would that police office have a right to
take his gun out and shoot him in the face....as a self preservation for having
his feelings hurt by someone calling him names??
Get real here Fredy...or else stay home out of the public eye as anyone can take
anything you say as a threat to THEIR self-preservation.....and might think YOU
would have it coming to you also.And I am sure there are quite a few nuts on the
internet who might take offense at you for YOUR opinions. It happens everyday,
just as it did to the newspaper columnist a week ago for daring to print the
truth someone did not like...and decide it was in their self preserving interest
to shoot the poor man in the back. Comments such as yours were not thought out
but a knee jerk reaction to a situation you know nothing about personally.I am
confident that during the course of your life you might have said or voiced your
opinions and even made a few remarks in anger....what if someone beat you to
death for that? Would it be then acceptable and deemed SELF-preservation, or
should it have been EGOpreservation.?Whatever the reason murdering someone or
beating them to death for a comment or insult is not how civilized people behave
and those who condone such barbaric attitudes should be kept a close eye on for
who know what they are capable of in a similar situation.
Liza
Creative Intelligence Agency wrote:
> Fredy <a...@jps.net> wrote in message news:39995258...@jps.net...
> | Creative Intelligence Agency wrote:
> | > Fredy <a...@jps.net> wrote
> | > | Stephen Dancs wrote:
> | > | >I'm sure he must have told one of the police man to suck his dick and
> mind
> | > | >his own bloody business
> | > |
> | > | That would only show what an idiot he was and therefore had it coming.
> | >
> | > Very good Fredy. I see you believe in murder if the wrong opinion is
> voiced.
> | > Stalin was of the same ilk as you.
> |
> | What made you draw the conclusion that I believe in murder?
> | I believe in self-preservation.
>
> You asserted that the police had a right to give him what he had coming for
> the sole reason of telling a policeman "to suck his dick and mind his own
> bloody business". There is nothing about "self-preservation" involved about
> that. What conclusion would you draw about your assertion that he "had it
> coming." What was that? Why, death of course. Consequently you believe in
> killing someone for voicing "to suck his dick and mind his own bloody
> business."