Group Fantasies and Jewish Radicalism by Stanley Rothman V2.0 R_0928
<<<Doc Tavish>>>
Dedicated to one "mentally unstable" and "crazy man"
(see my sig line) Jew who denies that his brethren
foisted on the world the most murderous ideology mankind
has ever seen (COMMUNISM), Yale F. Edeiken.
<<<In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is
distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed
a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit
research and educational purposes only. - FAIR USE INTENDED>>>
http://www.egroups.com/message/davids_outcasts/1859 <This link now redirects to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/davids_outcasts/message/1859
(Link active July 9, 2003 and has text sloppily displayed. Archived
locally as: davids_outcasts)
The same article is also mirrored at:
Yhe above is mirrored at:
http://www.faem.com/david/commu-5.htm
(Link verified as still being active July 9, 2003. Archived locally as: commu-5)
COMMUNISM
In a fascinating, detailed, article in The Journal of Psychohistory, Fall 1978,
Psychohistorian Stanley Rothman provides a useful summary of Jewish involvement
with Communism throughout the western World in "Group Fantasies and Jewish
Radicalism". He writes:
"In the inter-war years this role was probably most visible in the countries of
Eastern Europe, where Jews were prominent in Bela Kuhn's abortive attempt to set
up a Communist regime in Hungary and where they came to constitute over 40% of
the cadres of the Polish Communist Party, and probably comparable percentages
elsewhere. In Hungary, immediately after the Communist Party's accession to
power, the Politburo of the party contained only one non-Jew. It was jokingly
suggested that this 'Goy' had been admitted to the inner circles only because
someone was needed to sign decrees on Saturdays.
"In Germany the situation was rather different. Jews played a very important
role in the revolutionary Spartacist Movement of 1918-1919. However ... radical
Jewish Intellectuals remained largely unaffiliated, serving as unattached (often
bitter) radical critics of the Weimar Republic. The Frankfurt School which
produced Adorn, Fromm, Marcuse, Horkheimer and others was almost entirely
Jewish.
"In the United States, perhaps some 50% of the Communist Party was of Jewish
background during the 1930s; the radical American Student Union was heavily
Jewish and, just as importantly, the Soviet espionage apparatus in this country
... was pretty largely of Jewish background.
"In Western Europe ... Jews continued to take an active radical role. In France,
during the 1968 upheavals, students of Jewish background dominated Trotskyite
leadership cadres.
"Jews provided the critical mass for the student left and the counter culture in
the United States during the early and mid-1960s. Studies indicate that in its
initial phases, SDS leadership was about 67% Jewish."
Rothman goes on to show how Jewish radicals even "ran the show" at mid-Western
campuses. One (Gentile) SDS Organizer at Madison, Wisconsin, commented: "I am
struck by the lack of Wisconsin-born people (in the left) and the massive
preponderance of New York Jews. The situation at the University of Minnesota is
similar." In the faculties too, the radical factions were "largely Jewish".
In another article aimed at cognoscenti (American Jewish Historical Quarterly,
December 1976) Arthur Liebman shows in "The Ties That Bind":
"The members and particularly the officers of the left organizations were
predominantly Jewish ... Andre Schiffrin, President of SLID in 1956-57, and
himself of Jewish background, was very cognizant of the 'foreign element' within
SLID. 'For a while, all our national officers, myself included, were 'foreign
born' and the militant rhetoric within the organization was 'usually voiced in a
heavy Yiddish accent'. Others noted the frequent usage of Yiddish expressions
among the members. Another indication of the large Jewish component was the care
taken to ensure that regional and national conventions of these left
non-sectarian groups would not coincide with important Jewish holidays. No such
attention was paid to Christian holidays and on one occasion a Protestant
minister was sharply critical of SLID for scheduling a meeting on Good Friday."
Indeed, Liebman shows that Jews have regarded Communism as an extension of
Judaism for many years.
"The Jewish Daily Forward (a Yiddish socialist newspaper) to a large extent
surpassed the rabbis and Orthodoxy as the educator of the Jewish community in
the United States ... The more astute and sensitive Jewish Socialists in the
pre-World War I years ... sought opportunities to demonstrate that Judaism, as
they defined and interpreted it, was quite compatible if not supportive of
Socialism. Socialism was presented to the Jewish masses as a secular version of
Judaism. Thus, during a strike, the Law of Moses was cited in support of the
strikers. The Socialist Party's Rand School was lyricized by the Forward at its
founding in 1906 as 'the socialist' yeshiva ... where the rabbis and teachers of
our movement were being prepared'..
"In their curriculum, these schools emphasized the inter-relatedness between
Jewish and radical concerns. The progressive aspects of Judaism were stressed:
for example in the case of the Jewish New Year, Rosh Hashanah:
"'The traditional blowing of the shofar was the clarion to rally for liberation
of the Jewish people from oppressors ... the shofar blowing for the laboring
masses will drown out the trumpeting of the temporary ruling interests of the
earth.'
"The accomplishments of these schools were summarized in an editorial in Jewish
Life, a magazine with close ties to them, in the following manner:
" 'The schools develop in the children a kinship with Jewish and non-Jewish
laboring masses and with the history and progressive culture and traditions of
the Jewish people. The children acquire an elementary knowledge of Yiddish. They
are taught to identify their interest with those of the Negro people and other
oppressed groups.' "
At this point we could enter into a tedious cataloging of names (and pseudonyms)
of Communist leaders throughout the 20th century who "happened to be Jewish".
Certainly such a roll-call would be useful for archival purposes, but it would
undoubtedly be a boring and unnecessary chore for the reader. Such lists are
already available in the British samizdat publication mischievously titled Let
My People Go! and in the American: Behind Communism. But our purpose is not to
go over again ground which has already been firmly established. Even our two
Jewish writers cited above implicitly acknowledge the aphorism that Communism
is, was, and probably always will be, Jewish. Our aim is to explore behind the
pages of history; to read between the lines; to analyze and ask why. Why are
Jews radicals?
Rothman writes that:
"Jerry Rubin ascribes his own radicalism to being Jewish, and finds that
Cohn-Bendit shares the same feelings. It is clear, too, that his primary
hostility is toward Christianity, 'telling Pat Boone that Christianity has
murdered more people than any other ism in the history of the World.' Roger
Kahn, writing about the Columbia conflict, keeps remembering how badly Jews were
treated by the WASP establishment, and Paul Cowan is convinced, from his
experiences at Choate, that the WASPS are all anti-Semitic racists as Teitelbaum
has shown, Jews anxious to deny their Jewishness (those who feel marginal) are
more likely to perceive Christians as anti-Semitic than those who continue to
identify as Jews."
Rothman argues that "Jewish radicalism (as well as Zionism) stems from the
historically marginal position of Jews in Christian societies and to the family
structure and personality patterns derived from that marginality. Jews have
developed a particular set of perceptions and underlying motivations which can
be described as a group fantasy."
It may well be that Jews are marginal in western society in terms of religion,
culture, lifestyle etc. But they are certainly less marginal than, say, the
Orientals so one wonders why Orientals are not more radical than the Jews.
Rothman's subsidiary point is more interesting. He suggests that Jews,
perceiving themselves as being surrounded by a hostile, threatening host
society, are too few in number to openly display hostility back. So instead they
channel their hostility and aggression toward their own families (hence the
"emasculating" Jewish mother) and into occupations which allow for much indirect
(verbal) aggression. But as Rothman admits "Good studies of 'Jewish Personality
Traits' are few in number for a variety of reasons, not the least of which is,
as Sanua points out, that scholars have tended to avoid the subject." (No
mention of why, of course.) Rothman goes on:
"It is arguable that the European Diaspora and the ghetto experience encouraged
among Jews the emergence of a particular family pattern; a pattern characterized
by mothers who were 'protective' and controlling, especially with their male
children. It was not enough to teach such children to curb the direct expression
of aggression against the Christian enemy, for under such circumstances control
might be lost in a crisis situation. Rather, aggression must be driven
underground by appropriate child-rearing practices.
"The institutionalization of this pattern was to have profound effects upon both
Jewish males and Jewish females, effects which have been alluded to in part and
are spelled out in some detail by Bibring and Wolfenstein. The Jewish family
became, in Bibring's terms, a kind of matriarchy in which the husband was
perceived by the children as more fearful, less capable, and weaker than the
wife who cared for and somewhat dominated him in crucial areas, whatever his
professional and/or business achievements."
He goes on:
"Herbert Krugman, in a study of ex-Communists, found that middle-class members
of the Party (mostly Jews) placed far more stress on the need for 'hardness'
than did working-class members of the Party who were less likely to be Jewish.
Krugman studied in greatest depth the case reports by analysts of 10 men and 8
women. Five of the men evidenced strong wishes to submit and 'some slight
evidence of overt, passive homosexuality' during adolescence. The therapists
described them as sado-masochistic, turning such aggression onto themselves.
Their self-images varied between extremes - from worthlessness to superiority -
and with many there was an attitude of martyrdom, a 'bittersweet' anticipation
of revenge ...
"Many Jewish males, then, seemed to have a character structure classified by
Jules Nydes as 'paranoid masochistic'... The following represents a summary of
Nydes' formulation:
SADISTIC
1. Identifies with the aggressor.
2. Hostility is reactive and compensatory.
3. Effect of rage is accompanied by a sense of malicious triumph and release is
experienced as effect is discharged.
4. The motive for aggression is to hurt someone who seems unable to fight back,
and the effect is often intimidation of the victims.
PARANOID-MASOCHISTIC
1. Identifies with the victim in the sense that he is being persecuted.
2. Hostility is defensive against anticipated attack because of unconscious
feeling of guilt.
3. Effect of rage is accompanied by self-righteousness and often leads to
mounting fury rather than relief.
4. The apparent motive for aggression is to avoid being hurt by
counter-attacking an assumed aggressor. The effect is often to provoke
punishment -- gratification of a repressed wish -- and a reality confirmation of
preconceived persecution.
Rothman cites several profound examples of this exclusively Jewish phenomenon.
He quotes from an interview with a Jewish ex-Weatherman who recalls the
motivations of himself and his peers in the 1960s:
"A lot of the Weatherman leadership was Jewish and had never been tough street
kids, and I really believe that a tremendous amount of what they were doing was
overcoming their own fears about their masculinity ... Most of them ... had been
intellectually aggressive, but all of a sudden they were trying to be tough
street kids ... I think there was a lot of self-hate going on."
Rothman even draws on fictional, though highly accurate, caricature, such as
Philip Roth's highly personal Portnoy in Portnoy's Complaint.
"Portnoy, of course, is only a quasi-radical but, whatever he would like to
think his real motives are, his tirade to the analyst makes it quite clear that
his love for suffering humanity is far less important than his envy and hatred
of WASPS and his desire to literally 'screw' the 'goyim', despite the fact that
he despises his parents for their 'anti-goyish' attitudes. As he puts it:
"'I was on the staff of the house sub-committee investigating the television
quiz scandals. Perfect for the closet socialist like myself; commercial deceit
on a national scale, exploitation of the innocent public, elaborate corporate
chicanery -- in short good old capitalist greed. And then of course that extra
bonus, Charles Van Doren. Such character, such brains, such breeding, that
candor and school boyish charm -- that WASP wouldn't you say? And, turns out
he's a fake. Well, what do you know about that, Gentile America? Super-goy, a
'gonif'! Steals money ... Goodness, gracious me, almost as bad as Jews -- you
sanctimonious WASPS!
"'Yes, I was one happy Yiddle down there in Washington, a little Stern gang on
my own, busily exploding Charlie's honor and integrity, while simultaneously
becoming lover to the aristocratic Yankee beauty whose forebears arrived on
these shores in the seventeenth century.'
"The situation is not quite so simple, for, as the quotation indicates, Portnoy
also wants to become one of these strong, blond, 'goyim' who own America and
whose brothers are 'the engaging, good-natured, confident, clean, swift and
powerful halfbacks for the college football teams'. His unconscious hope is that
he can somehow become a Goy by sleeping with the 'shikses'."
There is much truth in Rothman's analysis. Jewish bourgeois Communism is not
just a bunch of Jewish Capitalists suddenly discovering a more profitable
venture -- State Capitalism. It is also a symptom of the eternal Jewish
neurosis; the envy of all things goyish that in turn becomes hatred of all
things goyish. Portnoy caricatures for us the eternal Jew: he would like nothing
better than to have blue blood flowing through his veins, and by sleeping with
the shikse he hopes that some of her blond, aristocratic ways will rub off on
him. But when nothing much seems to change, and Portnoy stays pretty much the
same little Yiddle he started off, then his envy turns to hate, and his
sleeping-with becomes "screwing". We are immediately reminded of Eldridge
Cleaver's Soul on Ice where he tells us that he raped White women in order to
get his own back on Whitey. We also observe the extraordinary disproportion in
inter-racial rapes (both male-female and male-male) which are almost 100% Black
against White.
Can it be that "Marxism" is no more than an expression of Jewish self-hate
redirected against the rest of us?
<end>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://www.csulb.edu/~kmacd/salter.htm
(Link active July 9, 2003. Archived locally as: csulb_salter)
(Excerpt)
Essay/Review
Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in
Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements
Reviewed by Frank Salter, Max Planck Institute, Andechs, Germany
Human Ethology Bulletin, September 2000, Vol. 15(3), pp. 16–22.
Most readers of this Bulletin will be aware of the controversy that
embroiled ISHE member Kevin MacDonald at the recent annual meeting of our
kindred organization, the Human Behavior and Evolution Society (HBES). At a
special session MacDonald was charged with anti-Semitism and his scientific
standing questioned. Any review must now be counted as contributing to that
controversy since it bears on MacDonald’s status as a scholar and evolutionary
psychologist. With this in mind I decided to combine the book review with a
description of the recent controversy concerning The Culture of Critique among
human evolutionists. I shall be arguing that much of the criticism of MacDonald
is founded on ignorance of his scholarship and a confounding of political and
scientific issues.
Charges of anti-Semitism, political motivation, and shoddy scholarship are
clearly plausible to many colleagues. The broad political Left, which
constitutes the academic establishment since at least the 1960s, views interest
in evolutionary accounts of human nature, and even claiming that such a thing
exists, as tantamount to fascism (Singer 1998). This prejudice was directed at
the pioneers of the evolutionary approach both in the U.S. and overseas, such as
the late Bill Hamilton, Irenäus Eibl-Eibesfeldt, Edward O. Wilson, Richard
Dawkins, Napoleon Chagnon, and many others. The new leaders of America’s
evolutionary scene have been at pains to dispell this image. The name of a
leading journal, Ethology & Sociobiology, was changed to an anodyne substitute,
and an emphasis was maintained on cross-cultural universals at the expense of
human biodiversity. Individual and group differences apart from age and sex are
still largely ignored, with race and ethnicity conspicuous by their near absence
from America’s leading evolutionary academic journals—Evolution and Human
Behavior (the HBES home journal), Human Nature, and Politics and the Life
Sciences.
Given such a defensive posture it is little wonder that a long, cold
inspection of Judaism should raise a storm. What is one to make of a scholar
who: (1) like so many anti-Semites takes pains to show the great
overrepresentation of Jews in radical political movements such as post-WWI
Bolshevism in Russia and Central Europe, the Communist Party of America, and the
New Left of the 1960s and 1970s (including the claim that in 1928 Jews were
1000% overrepresented among socialist Reichstag deputies); (2) who revives the
old Nazi canard about Freud by alleging that he was a Jewish activist nurturing
hatred of “Aryan” Europe, leading an essentially Jewish cabal of psychoanalysts
intent on subverting Christian sexual standards; (3) who portrays Jensen’s
hereditarian theory of IQ as mainstream; (4) who maintains that on average Jews
constitute a quarter of America’s elites and draws attention to 58%
representations in the senior ranks of Hollywood (which it “dominates”), 50% of
network television producers, and 40% of elite university law faculty; (5) who
maintains that since the mid 1960s the media elite has pursued a leftist agenda
that includes promoting racial integration through school busing; (6) who goes
so far as to question the appropriateness of large Jewish over-representation in
a democratic elite (7) who suggests that European-Jewish intellectual prominence
is genetically based and the result of eugenic processes within traditional
Jewish communities; (8) who argues that Jewish intellectuals such as Franz Boas,
Felix Frankfurter, Harold Laski, Max Lerner, Morris Cohen, and Robert Merton,
accelerated the “deChristianization” of America’s public life by selectively
promoting as cultural heroes Gentiles who advanced their goals, such as Margaret
Mead, John Dewey, and Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes; (9) who agrees with T. S.
Eliot’s most famous anti-Semitic statement, that any large number of
free-thinking Jews is undesirable if one wants to maintain or develop a society
in which a Christian, ethnically homogeneous tradition can flourish.
Surely it is reasonable to be outraged at such a person being associated
with a respectable academic association? Well, not if that person is Stanley
Rothman... <END>
Also see:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=tuh9nv43f16iedtft00topaa2gc7tpnbba%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: US Immigration Policy - Jewish Anti- Restrictionist Activity up to 1924
- "Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe were viewed as infected with
Bolshevism" Message-ID: <tuh9nv43f16iedtft...@4ax.com>
The above archive also features Ken MacDonald commenting on Jewish communism.
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=ncu5gvoc1nga0k933sgt0sbtglrv1nlb4e%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Communist Holocaust Has Killed Over 100 Million People
Message-ID: <ncu5gvoc1nga0k933...@4ax.com>
Date: 2 Jul 2003 15:33:38 GMT
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=3hv5gvookmlibha49ph75epk0dsk0do02l%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Communist Holocaust Killed Tens of Millions of People! (Vintage Post
With Re-Vitalized Links) R_0702
Message-ID: <3hv5gvookmlibha49...@4ax.com>
Date: 2 Jul 2003 16:36:00 GMT
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=uscefvgfqpvt2cs8l...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Forefathers of the Soviet State (Short Compilation) R_0623
Message-ID: <uscefvgfqpvt2cs8l...@4ax.com>
Date: 23 Jun 2003 16:58:25 GMT
~~Psychoanalysis Conceived by Jew and Used as Mind Control by Marxists~~
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=veqqgvs3780drd20k...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: The Soviet Art of Brainwashing-- A Synthesis of the Russian Textbook
on Psychopolitics Part 1
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 08:28:27 -0500
Message-ID: <veqqgvs3780drd20k...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=jpesgv097kuu9re67...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: The Soviet Art of Brainwashing-- A Synthesis of the Russian Textbook
on Psychopolitics Part 2
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 23:21:21 -0500
Message-ID: <jpesgv097kuu9re67...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=8hqqgv46uamtkls7l...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Soviets Abused Psychiatry To Repress Their Opposition (UPGRADED) V2.1
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 08:29:58 -0500
Message-ID: <8hqqgv46uamtkls7l...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=egqqgvgsadbmf7qa1...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Christian Student Dragged to Psych Ward (At Behest of Jews) V2.1
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 08:30:00 -0500
Message-ID: <egqqgvgsadbmf7qa1...@4ax.com>
http://www.psych.northwestern.edu/~garea/freud.html
(Link active July 10, 2003, Archived locally as: psychEDU_freud)
Biography of Sigmund Freud
Sigmund Freud was the father of psychology. Freud began his education in
1873 at the University of Vienna. He went to medical school and spent much time
studying physiology and neurology...
In 1902 he was appointed associate professor at the University of Vienna
and he founded the Vienna Psychoanalytic Society... There were major divisions
in the field while Freud and his followers tried to promote psychoanalysis
outside of Vienna.... <END>
http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/freud/freud01.html
(Link active July 10, 2003. Archived locally as: loc_freud)
Sigismund Schlomo Freud was born on May 6, 1856, in the small town of
Freiberg, now part of the Czech Republic... The city was a hothouse for radical
innovations in politics, philosophy, the arts, and sciences... Many have
investigated and speculated about the role of religion in Freud's thought.
Born into a Jewish family with religious roots, Freud would live a secular
life while continuing to identify himself as a Jew... <END>
Need I say more?
Tavish
---
Special Note: Yale F. Edeiken Esq. of Allentown, Pennsylvania- Supreme Court
ID# 40290 has falsely asserted he was associated with the two law firms
mentioned below-- Todd Miller & Associates and Trainor Law Offices. Both law
firms told me first hand that Yale F. Edeiken was never an attorney at their
firms!! That is fact!
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=SH9g7.634%247d....@newshog.newsread.com&lr=&hl=en
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: The Common Thread To All These Cancel Announcements...
Message-ID: <SH9g7.634$7d.2...@newshog.newsread.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 15:06:26 GMT
Defendant Bradshit <rdoc_...@my-deja.cpm, tavi...@ix.netcom,com> wrote
in message news:7lp1otkrsh37k7ioi...@4ax.com...
[...]
> Care to tell all of us why both Todd Miller and Paul Trainor distanced
> themselves from you
Because they were dealing with someone who was "mentally unstable"
(their dscription) and a "crazy man" (again, their description) who they
wanted to go away as quckly as possible.
~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~
Compare what Yale said on August 20, 2001 concerning two law firms attitudes
toward his presence with his own words: "they were dealing with someone who was
"mentally unstable" (their dscription) and a "crazy man" (again, their
description) who they wanted to go away as quckly as possible" to this which was
posted July 4, 2000: "Tubby has no respect from the legal community and as a
whole they wish he'd just waddle away."
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=20000704143439.5399.qmail%40nym.alias.net&rnum=4
From: SoloP...@nym.alias.net
Subject: Yale _Tubby_ Edeiken
Date: 2000/07/04
Message-ID: <200007041434...@nym.alias.net>
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=f78ogvk6b78m28v34...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: My Former Attorney Confirmed Yale F. "Tubby" Edeiken is a Very Obese
Waddler V2.1 Message-ID: <f78ogvk6b78m28v34...@4ax.com>
Date: 9 Jul 2003 13:58:44 GMT
_______________________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>