Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Talmud Teachings : Sanhedrin 57a

759 views
Skip to first unread message

Adhabuhu

unread,
Aug 17, 2003, 11:30:06 AM8/17/03
to
Sanhedrin 57a: JEWS MAY ROB AND KILL NON-JEWS. When a Jew murders a
Christian ("Cuthean"), there will be no death penalty. What a Jew steals
from a Gentile he may keep.

The meaning of the above is very clear. Because of the embarrassment of the
clarity of it, here is a twisted explanation WHICH SHOWS HOW MUCH THEY CARE
ABOUT GENTILES:
"Sanhedrin 57a - True but Inaccurate and Incomplete:
Robbery is covered and explained in the passages above. As far as killing
goes, in the beginning of this passage it does say that a Jew may kill or
steal from a non-Jew without penalty. Luckily, the passage does not stop
there.
The rest of the passage debates the validity of this law and eventually
decided by this reference to another law.

If a non-Jew is grazing sheep on your land illegally and falls into a pit,
it is not commanded that the Jew help him. But it is commanded that the Jew
cannot actively contribute to their death and therefore cannot be active or
instrumental in the harm of a Gentile. If a non-Jew is on your land
legally, you must help him if he falls into a pit.

Because of this reference, the conclusion was reached that killing or
stealing from a non-Jew was forbidden in all circumstances (except war)
because they would be activly contributing to the harm of the Gentile. "


AnonMoos

unread,
Aug 17, 2003, 12:02:44 PM8/17/03
to
Hey "Ana Kaadhibu", if you ever showed one tenth the degree of concern
for Christians who are actually being persecuted by Muslims (in such
places as Sudan, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia) as you do for the purely
theoretical and abstract views of Christianity which you claim to find
in the Talmud and other Jewish writings, then I might take your
postings on this subject seriously. But considering that your hatred
of Jews is actually much stronger than your putative interest in the
well-being of Christians, I just don't even bother.

P.S. A "Cuthean" is a Samaritan, not a Christian. Perhaps it would be
better if you didn't further humiliate yourself in public by inflicting
your embarrassingly abysmal ignorance of all non-Islalic religions on
these groups!

--
SAUDIA OMNIS IN PARTES TRES DIVIDENDA EST! Free Arabia by
splitting the Saudi tyranny into its three natural parts:
Hejaz-alHarameyn, Nejd-Wahhabistan, and Gulf-Petrolia.
Murderers are not Martyrs! http://symbolictruth.fateback.com/

Adhabuhu

unread,
Aug 17, 2003, 12:05:32 PM8/17/03
to
Just come out of the closet. Your posts prove you're not a christian.

"AnonMoos" <anon...@io.com> wrote in message
news:3F3FA724...@io.com...

The Department of Defense

unread,
Aug 17, 2003, 12:06:26 PM8/17/03
to

"Adhabuhu" <adha...@jehannama.com> wrote in message
news:gJN%a.209266$hOa....@news02.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com...

> Just come out of the closet. Your posts prove you're not a christian.

Why dont you come out of the closet?


AnonMoos

unread,
Aug 17, 2003, 11:26:59 PM8/17/03
to
"Adhabuhu" <adha...@jehannama.com> wrote:
>"AnonMoos" <anon...@io.com> wrote in message
>news:3F3FA724...@io.com...

>> Hey "Ana Kaadhibu", if you ever showed one tenth the degree of
>> concern for Christians who are actually being persecuted by Muslims
>> (in such places as Sudan, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia) as you do for
>> the purely theoretical and abstract views of Christianity which you
>> claim to find in the Talmud and other Jewish writings, then I might
>> take your postings on this subject seriously. But considering that
>> your hatred of Jews is actually much stronger than your putative
>> interest in the well-being of Christians, I just don't even bother.

>> P.S. A "Cuthean" is a Samaritan, not a Christian. Perhaps it
>> would be better if you didn't further humiliate yourself in public
>> by inflicting your embarrassingly abysmal ignorance of all

>> non-Islamic religions on these groups!



> Just come out of the closet. Your posts prove you're not a
> christian.

Whatever, dude -- Christians who go to Church regularly would consider
me to be a very bad Christian, but my ancestral background is purely
Christian. Else why would I be debating the doctrine of the Trinity
at great length with aac...@hotpop.com? You must be expecting me to
be almost as big a liar as you are -- but I'm not. Meanwhile, I know
more New Testament Greek _and_ Biblical Hebrew than you ever will.

--
Some Qur'an quotes: 5:20 qaala muusaa 5:21 "yaa qawmi ´dkhuluu ´l-'arDa
´l-muqaddasata ´llatii kataba ´llaahu lakum" 17:104 waqulnaa ... libanii
'israa'iila "´skunuu ´l-'arDa" || In English: Moses said, "My people,
go into the Holy Land which God has assigned to you!" And we said to the
Children of Israel, "Inhabit the land!" http://symbolictruth.fateback.com/

0 new messages