Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

God wouldn't have a place in a Matriarchal Society

0 views
Skip to first unread message

His Highness the TibetanMonkey, the Beach Cruiser Philosopher

unread,
May 31, 2011, 5:17:25 PM5/31/11
to
I don't expect the Christians to like this, but their God is
Patriarchal and other names that I rather reserve to myself. They
probably don't even know that most human societies have gone through
Matriarchy just as they have gone through Hunting-Gathering for 99% of
the time we have been walking on this planet. The Mighty Bike is
barely 200 years old, the Cage on Wheels --the car-- is around 100
years old and the Selfish Unnecessary Vehicle maybe 20 years old.
"OIL" --the source of our calamities-- is a necessity of the internal
combustion engine, not the bike, canoe or the sail boat. A Matriarchal
society won't have much use for it though.

The old dirty men --in the literal sense since there was no soap-- who
wrote the Bible didn't have a clue that "way before them" there were
Matriarchal society --in which the concept of "private herd" was
irrelevant-- or even what it all meant in political terms:

"The means of production are commonly owned and set of rules prevent
the accumulation of possessions or power. Compared to socialist or
communist systems they are characterized by the absence of a
centralised administration and ruling authority. Decisions concerning
every area of life are made by consensus including all genders and
generations."

http://matriarchy.info/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=103&Itemid=26

I don't need to make further accusations since the Bible itself is a
doctrine book in Patriarchy and Hierarchy. But we are not "SHEEP"
anymore --or so we hope.


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

THE WISE TIBETAN MONKEY SAYS

"Time to see more women ride bikes!"

http://webspawner.com/users/BANANAREVOLUTION

His Highness the TibetanMonkey, the Beach Cruiser Philosopher

unread,
May 31, 2011, 10:37:19 PM5/31/11
to
On May 31, 5:54 pm, Mike Jones <l...@dasteem.invalid> wrote:
> Responding to: His Highness the TibetanMonkey, the Beach Cruiser
> Philosopher
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 31, 2:10 pm, Mike Jones <l...@dasteem.invalid> wrote:
> >> Responding to: His Highness the TibetanMonkey, the Beach Cruiser
> >> Philosopher
>
> >> [...]

>
> >> >> > THE WISE TIBETAN MONKEY SAYS
>
> >> >> > "Time to see more women ride bikes!"
>
> >> >> >http://webspawner.com/users/BANANAREVOLUTION
>
> >> >> Its about time the women took over!
>
> >> >> Leave us blokes with the time to go huntin' shootin' and fishin'!
>
> >> > We should go hunting-gathering (shopping) instead of the other way
> >> > around.
>
> >> > Just kidding, we should go canoeing/sailing together.
>
> >> Supermarket surfing?
>
> > Isn't that a Christian sport along with SUVing?
>
> "SUV the little children to come to me." ?
>
> --
> *=(http://www.churchofreality.org/

They take their little little children to God in SUVs and pray. They
are afraid their kids ride bikes and die.

His Highness the TibetanMonkey, the Beach Cruiser Philosopher

unread,
Jun 1, 2011, 4:19:24 PM6/1/11
to
On Jun 1, 3:20 pm, Mike Jones <l...@dasteem.invalid> wrote:
> Responding to: His Highness the TibetanMonkey, the Beach Cruiser
> Philosopher
>
> [...]
>
>
>
> >> > They take their little little children toGodin SUVs and pray. They

> >> > are afraid their kids ride bikes and die.
>
> >> So Lucifer is the bringer of light transport?
>
> >> --
> >> *=(http://www.churchofreality.org/
>
> > Lucifer's job is tohaveeverybody live in fear. Once you become
> > "fearless" Lucifer goes away. Remember the movie?
>
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tm5jBa4LzxQ
>
> Here's one for ya.
>
> If theGodProject was taken over by some meglomaniac being (amongst
> others, "Thou shalthaveno othergodexept me" etc.), and if an ethical
> rebel entity prepared to try some damage limitation by informing the test
> subjects of the abuse they were subjected to, by who, and why,wouldn't
> that ethical entity be a prime target for some good old fashioned FUD?
>
> The track record of whatever is claiming to be "The One TrueGod" and
> what it acuses the rebel entity of being, while openly doing far worse
> things than the rebel entity was ever acused of, is a collection of the
> worse horror stories ever written.
>
> In a typical Hollywood-style movie, this "God" would look like the
> Emperor from Star Wars, and the Light Bringer would be played by Bruce
> Willis.
>
> C'maaaahn! You just /know/ this makes sense! }%)
>
> --
> *=(http://www.churchofreality.org/

God hates competition, particularly from sexually explicit female
goddesses...

On Jun 1, 4:08 pm, Dänk 666 <dank...@rocketmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 1, 6:28 am, "His Highness the TibetanMonkey, the Beach Cruiser

> > I think you are confused with my time frame. I'm talking about HUNTER-
> > GATHERERS, in which these "goddesses" do take a prominent role:
>
> >http://www.donsmaps.com/images10/willendorfvenusiIMG_1443.jpg
>
> > We don't know their names or deeds, but they worshiped female
> > goddesses, spirits and surely animals --not unlike the American
> > Indians. No place for a MALE CHAUVINIST PIG (monotheism).
>
> And how is that you know the customs and religious beliefs of a
> society that went extinct tens of thousands of years ago?

Have they found a guy among the Venuses???

"There are many interpretations of the figurines, often based on
little argument or fact. Like many prehistoric artifacts, the cultural
meaning of these figures may never be known. Archaeologists speculate,
however, that they may be emblems of security and success, fertility
icons, pornographic imagery, or even direct representations of a Great
Goddess or Mother Goddess or various local goddesses."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venus_figurines

That's visible evidence. They all share a vulva & big breasts. ;)

His Highness the TibetanMonkey, the Beach Cruiser Philosopher

unread,
Jun 2, 2011, 6:33:40 PM6/2/11
to
On Jun 2, 3:53 pm, SkyEyes <skyey...@cox.net> wrote:
> On May 31, 7:43 am, "His Highness the TibetanMonkey, the Beach Cruiser
>
> Philosopher" <nolionnoprob...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> <Snip foregoing>

>
> > The old dirty men --in the literal sense since there was no soap-- who
> > wrote the Bible didn't have a clue that "way before them" there were
> > Matriarchal society --in which the concept of "private herd" was
> > irrelevant-- or even what it all meant in political terms:
>
> Actually, they *did* know about it - and they hated it. That's why
> the bible is so full of misogyny - it's a reaction against matriarchy
> and Goddess worship.

This commandment seems aimed at them...

"Do not have any other gods before me"

Funny the worshiping of Virgin Mary brought a woman back, but she was
a virgin, not a sexy goddess. It seems as if they were trying to
repress women AND sex.

They tried to avoid a healthy --happy-- human being at all costs...

"Reich also explains the difficulty in work and the waste of
intellectual potential by people who have to spend a major portion of
their energy fighting with their sexual desires and how that drains
the energy which otherwise could have been available for further
growth and work. "

http://matriarchy.info/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=16&Itemid=41

I rest my case for now, and take a break. ;)

Here's a sexy goddess, just for the hell of it:

http://static.desktopnexus.com/thumbnails/18695-bigthumbnail.jpg

Brave Burger

unread,
Jun 5, 2011, 12:48:33 PM6/5/11
to

Oh yes, here we go again, if women ruled the world,..........
Come on, after Margereth Tatcher nobody believes that anymore ;o)


His Highness the TibetanMonkey, the Beach Cruiser Philosopher

unread,
Jun 5, 2011, 1:39:46 PM6/5/11
to
On Jun 5, 12:48 pm, "Brave Burger" <b...@veburg.er> wrote:
> Oh yes, here we go again, if women ruled the world,..........
> Come on, after Margereth Tatcher nobody believes that anymore ;o)

Well and Sarah Palin...

But in a male chauvinist society we don't have good prenatal care and
stuff like that. It takes a woman to notice, I guess.

Women are more shopper-gatherers and men are more hunter-professional
types. It takes a powerful hunter to lay a woman --pretty women
anyway.

I'm talking about a hardcore capitalist society, of course.

Brave Burger

unread,
Jun 5, 2011, 1:44:41 PM6/5/11
to
His Highness the TibetanMonkey, the Beach Cruiser Philosopher wrote:
> On Jun 5, 12:48 pm, "Brave Burger" <b...@veburg.er> wrote:
>> Oh yes, here we go again, if women ruled the world,..........
>> Come on, after Margereth Tatcher nobody believes that anymore ;o)
>
> Well and Sarah Palin...

Yeah but she came later.

> But in a male chauvinist society we don't have good prenatal care and
> stuff like that. It takes a woman to notice, I guess.

Oh yes you do, come visit us.

> Women are more shopper-gatherers and men are more hunter-professional
> types. It takes a powerful hunter to lay a woman --pretty women
> anyway.

Neah you just need money.

> I'm talking about a hardcore capitalist society, of course.

Yes like we all live in.


His Highness the TibetanMonkey, the Beach Cruiser Philosopher

unread,
Jun 5, 2011, 2:04:00 PM6/5/11
to
On Jun 5, 1:44 pm, "Brave Burger" <b...@veburg.er> wrote:
> His Highness the TibetanMonkey, the Beach Cruiser Philosopher wrote:
>
> > On Jun 5, 12:48 pm, "Brave Burger" <b...@veburg.er> wrote:
> >> Oh yes, here we go again, if women ruled the world,..........
> >> Come on, after Margereth Tatcher nobody believes that anymore ;o)
>
> > Well and Sarah Palin...
>
> Yeah but she came later.

She's the new danger. And she's prettier than Thatcher... twice the
danger!

>
> > But in a male chauvinist society we don't have good prenatal care and
> > stuff like that. It takes a woman to notice, I guess.
>
> Oh yes you do, come visit us.

Someday before I die...

>
> > Women are more shopper-gatherers and men are more hunter-professional
> > types. It takes a powerful hunter to lay a woman --pretty women
> > anyway.
>
> Neah you just need money.
>
> > I'm talking about a hardcore capitalist society, of course.
>
> Yes like we all live in.

Well, at least you don't need a big truck to show you are man...

What's wrong with women's genes that they go with the hunters even if
they are ugly?

http://lovelivingfit.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/caveman.jpg

Isn't that a sign of weakness?

0 new messages