Multiculturalists and the outlawing of dissent
Antimulticulture
http://www.epado.bravehost.com/takingback02.htm
Andrew Patterson
Chris Anderson, in The Asianisation of Australia, has described
the purpose of the Multiculturalists legislating against free
speech:
"Racial Vilification laws have been enacted at both state and
federal levels specifically in order to crush the opposition of
Australians to the Asianisation of their country (not, as
various politicians have suggested, to stop illegal behaviour
against minorities - as such behaviour is already covered by
existing legislation, such as laws relating to offensive
behaviour, assault and battery, defacing property, incitement to
riot, etc.)."
Mark Uhlmann, editor of The Record, verified this view:
"A major aim of Federal racial vilification legislation... is
to complement the social intimidation which already greets
anyone, particularly in public office, who dares to criticise
matters connected to immigration and multiculturalism".
Nationalist organisations opposed to the Asianisation of
Australia have, for many years, realised the purpose of these
Multiculturalist laws, and have recognised the true face of
Multiculturalism. Chris Anderson wrote;
"The Establishment proclaims "democracy" and "freedom of
speech" when such posturing serves its purpose, and for ordinary
matters these ideals are basically observed, but when its
liberal-internationalist creed is threatened - then its "true
colours" are revealed."
"While the System claims it is democratic, it actually has a
hidden tyrannical, or quasi-fascist, nature. This is why it
deliberately continues mass Asian immigration, even when it is
widely known that most Australians oppose it; and this is why
they try to silence, or crush, the activities of Australian
patriots and nationalists, because they fear the potential of
these groups."
As existing laws already cover illegal activities against
minorities, the anti-Nationalist usage of these laws are readily
apparent. Why have the Multiculturalists introduced
anti-democratic laws? The short answer is "Because they can";
that is, because they have the power to threaten and jail their
ideological enemies, they will do so. It is quite obvious that
the Multiculturalists adhere to the fascist maxim of "might is
right".
Racial vilification laws can be used to target organisations
which oppose mass immigration. Any "politically incorrect"
utterances could be used to threaten jail or fines. Of course,
with around 70% of Australians opposing mass immigration,
there's a lot of people to be put in jail. Would it be cynical
to suggest that this law has been designed to scare ordinary
Australians into silence? In actual practice, these laws would
be mainly used against Nationalist activists and organisations,
along with some prosecutions against members of the general
public.
As Mark O'Connor says:
"The great advantage of such 'thought crimes' is that since
they are not tangible, the accuser need not produce solid
evidence."[5] These new laws are introducing a new concept into
modern Australia; that of the true "political crime". Although
they are mainly designed to squash patriotic political parties
by fear, and to scare ordinary Australians into silence and
passivity, eventually they will have to be used, thereby
creating something that naïve Australians thought existed only
in places like Nazi Germany and Communist Russia: "political
prisoners".
The United Kingdom, New Zealand, and Canada have racial
vilification laws, but it seems that the Multiculturalists are
following the lead of the Nazis, who were quite adept at
crushing opposition with various laws (all in the name of the
"common good", of course).
In effect, the Multiculturalists are saying to anyone who wants
the right to voice their opinion in public: "Agree with us or go
to jail". The so-called "racial vilification" laws are
authoritarian and neo-Nazi in nature.
Freedom of speech under attack
Free speech in Australia is under severe attack by
Multiculturalist bigots. The various "racial vilification" laws
are nothing but draconian laws banning opposition to
Multiculturalism and intimidating people exposing its effect
upon society.
Such attacks upon freedom of speech can be compared historically
to other authoritarian measures by regimes against those who
oppose the underlying ideology of the ruling class, whether it
be anti-democratic laws against republicans, trade unionists, or
racial nationalists.
In any fair dinkum democracy, citizens are able to criticise any
public policy, institution, or ideology without fear of
harassment from the Government, especially without the fear of
being carted off to jail.
Of one case, Andrew Bolt of the Herald Sun wrote that:
"To see a couple of churchmen dragged before a tribunal to
stand trial for what they've said about Islam is to see Victoria
steeped in shame. What totalitarian instinct inspired the Bracks
Government to pass this wicked racial and religious vilification
law - this offence against free speech?".
"Judge Michael Higgins last week began hearing a complaint by
the Islamic Council of Victoria against the Catch the Fire
Ministry, which held a seminar, featuring Pastor Danny Nahlia
and Pakistani Christian Daniel Scot, on Islam's teachings. In
particular, the speakers quoted passages of the Koran that
incited violence against Christians and Jews. But in the
audience were three Muslim converts, taking notes."
"This law must not be allowed to stand."
Notice that Andrew Bolt referred to a "tribunal"? Why were these
charges not heard at a trial by jury? The answer is simple:
Multiculturalists fear that the ordinary men and women on a jury
will see their law for the brand of Multiculturalist Nazism that
it is. Citizens should realise that such anti-democratic trends
are not new under Multiculturalist regimes, where ordinary
freedoms are perverted or disappear altogether. Similarly, in
discrimination cases, the presumption of innocence often
disappears, whereby the prosecution no longer has to provide the
traditional burden of proof; simply claim "discrimination"
against your boss to give grief to your employer.
No trial by jury? No burden of proof? No presumption of
innocence?
Multiculturalism cannot stand up to close scrutiny and
criticism, and that is why it is a creed that can only exist by
creating a climate of fear and intimidation amongst ordinary
citizens. Multiculturalism is an authoritarian ideology, full of
evil, hatred, and loathing, whilst posing as a creature of
beauty, light, and love - it is truly a slavering wolf in
sheep's clothing.
Rabid Multiculturalists
John Bennett, President of the Australian Civil Liberties Union,
revealed that many Australians face threats from
Multiculturalists:
"The laws relating to libel, contempt of court and racial
vilification continue to inhibit freedom of speech. People who
speak out may receive death threats, may be threatened with loss
of employment, may be expelled from organizations, and may be
subject to often effective pressure from their friends, family
and fellow employees. Distributors of books and magazines have
sometimes refused to distribute books with unpopular idea".
Mainstream journalist Paul Sheehan, in his informative book
Among The Barbarians relates a story that reveals the ugly face
of Multiculturalism, whereby - out of the view of the general
public - leading Multiculturalists discuss plans to impose laws
to take away our freedoms.
"At the height of the news media's Hanson mania in late 1996,
I attended the monthly meeting of the Ethnic Community Council
of New South Wales. The meeting began with the chairperson,
Angela Chan, holding up a copy of the Bulletin with a photo of
Pauline Hanson on the cover and the headline: POLL SHOCK: AT
LEAST FIVE SEATS. The latest opinion poll had found that if
Hanson formed her own party it would win five seats at the next
Senate election."
"'She is a danger to Australia,' said Chan, who had campaigned
vigorously during the 1996 federal election, warning that a
Coalition victory could mean 'the death of multiculturalism'.
When she handed the meeting over to her vice-chair, Josie Lacey,
Lacey continued the rhetoric."
"..'If the Human Rights Act is weakened, this country is
lost.'"
"Attendance at the meeting was larger than usual, about forty
people, because lawyers from the Human Rights and Equal
Opportunity Commission had come to talk about proposed changes
to the Racial Hatred Act."
"'How long does it take before she [Pauline Hanson] goes to
jail?' Josie Lacey asked the lawyers."
"When told that Hanson could not go to jail under existing
laws, she said the Act needed amendment. This led to a
discussion about the Act's effectiveness. It soon became obvious
that everyone in the room (other than me) wanted to get rid of
the section which stated that 'a fair and accurate report' in
the news media was exempt from prosecution as an act of racial
hatred."
"'The British invented the concept of race and used it to rule
the world,' said Dr Anthony Pun, a vice-chair of the Council,
who would replace Angela Chan as chairperson the following year."
"It was not exactly a gathering of civil libertarians."
Suppression of free speech even applies to the reporting of
crime. Journalists are discouraged from reporting the race of
offenders. Apparently, the Australian public cannot be trusted
with the truth.
Dr Richard Basham, one of Australia's leading authorities on the
links between crime and culture, has courageously noted the
pressures brought to bear against those who speak out about
ethnic crime trends in Australia:
"Organised crime, drugs, gangs, extortion, tax evasion, fraud,
these have now reached a level where they are damaging the
national economy. What has happened at Cabramatta is just the
tip of the iceberg, but it often seems that anyone who dares to
talk about Asian crime in this country is shouted down as a
racist."
"to use charges of racism as a moral skewer to silence
discussion of ethnic-based crime is arrogant and, ultimately,
dangerous. Censorship has divided this country. All crime has
its cultural base and it is foolish to pretend, for example,
that Asians don't dominate the hard drug trade in Australia."
Normally, Dr Basham would be shouted down as a racist; however,
unfortunately for the Multiculturalists, he is married to an
Asian wife and has a Eurasian daughter, and thus has avoided the
often used tag of "racist" that the Multiculturalists so readily
dish out against anyone who doesn't provide unequivocal support
for their social theories.
The usage of the tag "racist" is aimed at anyone who argues
against Multiculturalists and their policies. It is a cheap and
easy way for the media, academics, politicians, and
Multiculturalist lobbyists to smear and denigrate any
opposition. They use the tag freely, no matter whether they have
any idea whether their victim is "racist" or not. Often, the
truth seems of little importance to Multiculturalists, and they
use accusations of "racism" as an effective way to silence their
opponents, especially against those in public office.
The trend to use such constant accusations of 'racism' in the
Australian immigration debate has been recognised by the
immigration scholar, John Atchison:
"One of the most disturbing features of the so-called and
inaccurately described Blainey debate was the associated latent
fascism in the labeling of opponents as racists."
Considering Sheehan's account of Multiculturalists in New South
Wales, along with similar instances, there is little doubt that
the term "latent fascism" applies to Multiculturalists.
Under the rule of Multiculturalism, "Free speech" has become an
empty phrase, without any true meaning, except perhaps for the
maxim attributed to the Multiculturalists: "the speech we
approve of will be free".
Perhaps this loss of one of the main pillars of democracy is due
to the fact that our current generations have become so used to
having freedom of speech as part of the general background of
life, that they do not recognise the threat when the
Multiculturalists of the "elite" ruling class begin to attack
this basic freedom. This is, no doubt, a trend to be repeated
throughout history, and evokes memories of Polybius, who, in his
history of the Roman republic, complained that the Romans had
lost interest in freedom of speech:
"But as soon as a new generation has succeeded and the
democracy falls into the hands of the grandchildren of its
founders, they have become by this time so accustomed to
equality and freedom of speech that they cease to value them and
seek to raise themselves against their fellow citizens, and it
noticeable that the people most liable to this temptation are
the rich ...and then the rule of democracy is transformed into
government by violence and strong-arm methods."
Multiculturalist laws
Graeme Campbell, as the Member for Kalgoorlie (Labor Party),
spoke out in Parliament against Multiculturalist racial
vilification legislation:
"I can give the House a much more succinct, current and
germane description of racism and of a racist. A racist today is
anyone who wins an argument with a multiculturalist."
"I believe the Racial Hatred Bill is an insult to Australia
and Australians. It is an absolute disgrace that it has even
been brought before the parliament and it will be an infamous
day in our political history if it is passed. This is one of the
most draconian pieces of legislation ever brought before the
parliament in peacetime. It is in the same class as the
Communist Party Dissolution Bill, and the case for it is shot
through with mendacity and misrepresentation. The fact that this
bill is before the parliament and may well be passed says a
great deal about our political leadership."
"Our system has always been able to cope with corrupt
individual politicians, but when entire political parties have
been intellectually corrupted the system begins to break down.
On key issues such as immigration, multiculturalism and
Asianisation we have a tyranny of the minorities and a
disenfranchisement of the majority. This bill is the starkest
indicator of that process so far."
"The elites who have been pushing these policies realise that,
even though they dominate the bureaucracies and academia, they
are losing the intellectual argument. Their crude cries of
'racist' and 'racism' are proving less and less effective. Now
they want a piece of legislation to compliment the declining
power of the social sanctions against speaking out. It. can be
observed that one cost of increasing the cultural and racial
diversity of democratic nations has been a decline in the
ability to speak freely."
Attacks by Multiculturalists upon public freedoms are happening
not only in Australia, but also in other Western nations. Leo
McKinstry wrote in The Spectator of the British trend towards
Multiculturalist authoritarianism.
"In our modern secular society, we pride ourselves on our
supposed tolerance. We sneer at the bigotry of the past,
wondering how the monstrous cruelty of events such as the
Spanish Inquisition could ever have occurred. But we should not
be so smug. For in Britain today we have our own powerful creed
- multiculturalism - which is imposed on the public by a
political establishment that is brimming with self-righteous
fervour. And anyone refusing to accept this dogma is likely to
be branded a heretic, bullied and brainwashed until they change
their opinions."
"But the creed of multiculturalism is so powerful that almost
any form of repression and thought-control is justified in the
name of 'rooting out prejudice'."
"Instead of facing up to reality, the multiculturalists are
becoming more authoritarian in their suppression of negative
thinking. In their eagerness to impose the ideology of
diversity, they are like the old Soviet Politburo, which
pretended that communism had created an earthly paradise and
that anyone who claimed otherwise was either a crank or a
criminal. Over the last three years, there has been a raft of
new regulations designed to crack down on dissent."
"The fixation with racism has also overturned one of the
essential principles of justice, that the accused is innocent
until proven guilty. The race regulations of 2003 have shifted
the burden of proof in employment-tribunal cases from the
accuser to the alleged discriminator. In sinister, bureaucratic
language, the Commission for Racial Equality warns that 'for the
discriminator, the consequences of the new burden of proof will
be significant. Any failure to provide a satisfactory or
adequate explanation may be determinative since the courts and
tribunals must find in favour of the complainant.'"
"Freedom of speech and rights of association are also
disappearing. At this year's Labour party conference, the
Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, Patricia Hewitt,
promised, to resounding cheers, that a new law will soon be
passed allowing trade unions to expel members of the BNP.
Ironically, the police, so widely condemned for their supposed
racism, are now being turned into instruments of social control.
Gloucestershire Police, for instance, have employed undercover
plainclothes officers to observe the behaviour of diners in
Indian and Chinese restaurants, in an exercise called 'Operation
Napkin'. In the wake of 9/11, the government created a new
offence of `religiously aggravated threatening behaviour', which
can be used against anyone who challenges the anti-Western
outbursts of Muslims.
"Indeed, an Exeter man, Alistair Scott, was sentenced to 200
hours' community service in October 2002 on just such a charge,
after he had rowed with a Muslim neighbour who called bin Laden
a great man, 9/11 a 'glorious day' and Mr Scott a 'Zionist pig'.
Inevitably the Muslim, Mohammed Hudaib, was not prosecuted. A
month later, the television presenter Robin Page was arrested -
though never charged - for opening a speech at a countryside
rally with the words 'If there is a black, vegetarian, Muslim,
asylum-seeking, one-legged lesbian lorry-driver present, then
you may be offended at what I am going to say, as I want the
same rights that you have got already.'"
"But perhaps most worrying of all is the attempt to reclassify
racism as a mental illness. In the United States there is now a
serious debate over whether those accused of being racists are
actually suffering from delusions which require treatment by the
state, including the use of anti-psychotic medication. Dr Alvin
Poussaint of the American Psychiatric Association has said, 'If
we want to do any kind of prevention, psychiatrists have to know
and believe themselves that this is a serious mental disorder.'
Another psychologist, Dr William von Hippel, even claims to have
located the part of the frontal lobes in the brain that makes
people racist."
"Psychiatry has often been used to silence those who refuse to
accept the official doctrines of the state. The Soviet Union was
notorious for branding political dissidents as 'mentally ill',
incarcerating them in psychiatric institutions. In communist
China it has been estimated that 15 per cent of psychiatric
inmates may be in custody for political reasons, many of them
suffering from what the gruesome Ministry for Public Security
calls 'political abnormality illness'."
"in its myopia over race and its hysterical intolerance of
dissent, this doctrine is dragging us along the road towards
tyranny."
The anti-democratic nature of the Multiculturalists is shown by
their moves against free speech, and their wish to jail
opponents of their ideology by using Nazi-style laws thinly
disguised as "racial vilification legislation", as well as by
various other underhanded sly moves towards silencing political
and social dissent.
--
Antimulticulture
"Bring Back Democracy!..."
Newsboard:
http://www.gossiping.net/phpBB2/?mforum=newsboard
http://www.geocities.com/anti_multiculture/index.html
Unite Against Multicult'ism!
"Abolish Multi-Culty and String Up the Traitors!"
http://www.alphalink.com.au/~eureka/mccorm.htm
Asianisation of Australia: The Grand Plan
Avenger
controversial best-seller, "The Rage and the Pride", which described Islam
as oppressive and Arab immigrants in Europe as dirty, foul-mouthed and
bigoted.
She called on Europeans to defend their culture and values instead of
adjusting to immigrants' needs.
"Antimulticulture" <Antimult...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:450a94aa$0$7290$5a62...@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...