jews have always been the no.one enemy of western civilisation
wally
> Wow!
>
> This is some really interesting shit!
>
> How come you didn't crosspost this message to the NG "alt.nationalism.white-power"?
the holohoax makes them saints
, churchill was right about the post war world and the 'empires of the
mind'
jews rule the memeosphere and jam dissident voices under a mountain of
pop-nigger junk.
1) THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY SUMMARY
We believe that a Jewish conspiracy to control the world and destroy
European society exists based on the following evidence:
1. The Jewish conspirators have created, supported, and financed
numerous European disasters including: World War I, World War II, the
Cold War, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, Communism, Socialism,
Liberalism, Capitalism, mass immigration, affirmative action programs,
big government, forced integration, multiracialism, liberal media, and
liberal schools. These disasters have seriously weakened European
society. Furthermore, these disasters were not accidental, rather
they were deliberate actions committed by the Jewish conspirators.
This conspiracy is effectively a perpetual Jewish war against the
Europeans.
2. Jews have opposed Europeans throughout history. A timeline of the
Jewish conspiracy is given in section 2 below.
3. Jews are raised to be pro-Jewish and anti-Gentile.
4. Jews have resisted assimilation with Gentiles throughout history
while living as a minority group within Gentile society.
5. Judaism is an ethnic religion that is intended for Jews only.
6. Judaism itself is pro-Jewish and anti-Gentile.
7. Judaism discourages Gentiles from converting to Judaism or
intermarrying with Jews.
8. Jews consider themselves to be God's Chosen People and superior to
Gentiles, as
described in Exodus 18.
9. The Jews are the only ethnic group with sufficient financial power
and political power to effectively attack European society from
within.
10. The Jews have been predators and parasites within European
society throughout history.
11. The European people of the world have been under attack and in
decline since World War I began in 1914 primarily due to the Jewish
conspiracy.
12. The Jews control the banking and monetary systems.
13. The Jews control the media corporations in television, radio,
publishing, and the press.
14. The Jews control the United States government and the European
governments. This is called the Zionist Occupation Government (ZOG).
15. Jews attempt to eliminate discussion of the Jewish conspiracy by
accusing Gentiles of antisemitism, racism, persecution, and
discrimination. They use censorship to aggressively suppress
criticism of their culture.
16. The Jews monopolize several major industries such as oil,
diamonds, electronics, and software.
17. The Jews have been allowed to live in freedom in the United
States, Canada, Britain, Germany, France, and other European nations
for hundreds of years. However, the Jews have waged a long term race
war against their host nations.
18. The Jewish conspirators are motivated by hatred, violence,
destruction, racism, greed, and competition.
19. The Jews use any and all methods to attack European society,
including war, revolution, crime, propaganda, laws, and deception.
20. The evidence given above, taken together, shows that the Jewish
Conspiracy to control the world and destroy European society does
exist.
============
(2) THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY TIMELINE: 1000 AD to 2000 AD
This timeline describes the historical events of the Jewish Conspiracy
over the past 1000 years.
1066 Jews enter England with the Norman Invasion and establish
banks.
1255 Hugh of Lincoln is ritually murdered by Jews in England.
1290 The Jews are expelled from England by King Edward I due to
their anti-British culture.
1492 Christopher Columbus discovers America.
1492 The Spanish Inquisition begins. The Jews are expelled from
Spain. Some Jews, called Marranos, convert to Catholicism but
secretly practice Judaism.
1620 Jewish slave traders bring slaves to America.
1655 Cromwell allows Jews to return to England.
1694 The Bank of England is established.
1740 Jewish slave trader Aaron Lopez brings thousands of slaves to
America.
1760 The Board of Deputies of British Jews is established in
Britain.
1770 Jewish banker Mayer Rothschild establishes a bank in Frankfurt,
Germany. In subsequent years the five sons of Mayer Rothschild,
Nathan, James, Salomon, Carl, and Amschel, established banks in
London, Paris, Frankfurt, Vienna, and Naples, forming an international
network of banks. The Rothschild banks provide major loans to the
governments of Europe, thereby gaining political power. The banks
also finance European wars, thereby profiting from warfare. The
Rothschild family is strongly pro-Jewish and have been major players
in the ZOG conspiracy.
1775 The American Revolution begins. Jewish banker Haym Salomon
provides financial support.
1776 The Illuminati secret society is established by Jewish agent
Adam Weishaupt in Germany.
1789 The French Revolution begins.
1793 King Louis XVI of France is guillotined by the French
Revolutionaries.
1805 The Napoleonic Wars begin.
1815 Napoleon is defeated at the Battle of Waterloo in Belgium.
Nathan Rothschild receives early news of Napoleon's defeat, and
manipulates the English bond market, acquiring English bonds at
heavily discounted prices.
1830 The Rothschilds finance the establishment of the nation of
Belgium, which secedes from the Netherlands.
1837 Benjamin Disraeli becomes the first Jewish member of parliament
in Britain.
1848 Jewish politician Karl Marx publishes the Communist Manifesto.
1853 The Jewish B'nai B'rith (Sons of the Covenant) organization is
established in New York City.
1858 Baron Lionel de Rothschild becomes a member of parliament in
Britain.
1859 The Rothschilds decide to support the South in the American
slavery dispute.
1859 The Rothschilds finance the construction of the Suez Canal.
1861 The American Civil War begins, threatening to divide the USA
into two nations. The war lasts for 4 years and causes vast
destruction to the USA. Jewish lawyer Judah Benjamin is attorney
general, secretary of war, and secretary of state for the Confederacy.
1865 President Abraham Lincoln is assassinated by John Wilkes Booth
and a group of several co-conspirators. Judah Benjamin flees to
England.
1867 Karl Marx publishes Das Kapital.
1868 Benjamin Disraeli becomes the first Jewish prime minister of
Britain.
1869 Jewish banker Jay Gould attempts to corner the American gold
market.
1870 France attacks Germany, starting the Franco-Prussian war.
1870 John D. Rockefeller establishes Standard Oil.
1871 The Rothschilds finance France's war reparations to Germany.
1881 Russian Czar Alexander II is assassinated by Jewish
conspirators.
1882 Millions of East European Jews begin to immigrate to the USA.
1890 The Rothschilds finance Jewish colonies in Palestine.
1891 France and Russia form a military alliance, threatening
Germany.
1894 Alfred Dreyfus, a Jewish captain in the French army, is
convicted of giving secrets to Germany.
1896 Theodor Herzl organizes the First Zionist Congress in Basel,
Switzerland. He proposes the creation of a Jewish nation in Palestine
in his document The Jewish State.
1898 The United States goes to war with Spain over a mysterious
explosion on the battleship Maine docked in Havana, Cuba. Jewish
publisher Joseph Pulitzer encourages starting a war in his newspaper,
New York World.
1899 Britain goes to war with the Dutch Boers of South Africa to
capture the gold mines and diamond mines for the Jews. Britain
detains Boer civilians in concentration camps. Thousands of Boer men,
women, and children are killed.
1901 American President William McKinley is assassinated by Jewish
radical Leon Czolgosz.
1901 The Anglo-Japanese Alliance is signed. This enables Japan to
prepare for war with Russia.
1901 Rothschild partner J.P. Morgan bank establishes the United
States Steel corporation.
1904-1905 Japan attacks the Russian navy at Port Arthur in China,
starting the Russo-Japanese War. Jewish banker Jacob Schiff of New
York City provides 200 million dollars in war loans to Japan.
1904 France and Britain sign the Anglo-French Entente, threatening
Germany. France and Britain initiate secret military conferences to
prepare for war.
1905 Radical Socialists, led by Jewish politicians Vladimir Lenin and
Leon Trotsky, organize a revolution against the Russian government.
The revolution is terminated by the government, but the government
agrees to some concessions.
1905 The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion is received by the
British Museum. This document, which may be authentic, describes a
Jewish plan to destroy European civilization and rule the world. Many
of the events described in the Protocols have subsequently occurred.
1905 Jewish intellectual Sigmund Freud publishes his theories on
psychology.
1907 The Anglo-Russian Agreement is signed.
1907 The Triple Entente of France, Russia, and Britain is
established. This alliance encircles Germany and threatens the
security of Germany. The preconditions for World War I are now
established.
1908 The Young Turks revolt in Turkey.
1909 The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People
(NAACP) is established by the Jewish politicians for the
African-Americans.
1909 British Oil booms in the Middle East.
1912 Woodrow Wilson is elected president of the USA. Wilson, a
liberal Democrat, is financed by Jewish banker Bernard Baruch.
1913 The Federal Reserve Bank is established in the USA. Jewish
banker Felix Warburg is the first chairman of the Federal Reserve.
1913 The United States imposes a tax on personal income, increasing
the government's power and wealth.
1913 The Jewish Anti-Defamation League of the B'nai B'rith is
established in New York City to oppose anti-semitism.
1914 Austria-Hungarian Archduke Franz Ferdinand is assassinated by
Jewish student Gavrilo Princip and a group of co-conspirators. Pelley
claims that the assassins were financed by Jewish businessman Herbert
Samuel of Britain, owner of Shell Oil. This assassination triggers
World War I in Europe. World War I is an unacceptable war and it
starts the decline of the European people.
1914 Margaret Sanger publishes Family Limitations.
1915 A German submarine sinks the Lusitania.
1917 Under heavy pressure from the Jews and Britain, the United
States declares war on Germany and enters World War I.
1917 The Balfour Declaration is announced by the British government,
creating a Jewish homeland in Palestine. The Declaration is in part a
reward for Jewish support of the Allies during World War I.
1917 Lenin leads the Communist Revolution in Russia.
1918 Russian Czar Nicholas II and his family are assassinated by the
Jewish communists Lenin, Trotsky, and Sverdlov.
1919 The punishing Treaty of Versailles is signed in France. The
Treaty effectively continues the war against Germany. Jewish American
banker Bernard Baruch imposes massive financial reparations on
Germany.
1924 The United States Congress restricts immigration.
1929 The New York stock market crashes. A global economic
depression begins.
1933 Adolph Hitler becomes Chancellor of Germany.
1933 Jews declare international boycott of Germany.
1933 U.S. president Franklin D. Roosevelt introduces the New Deal
socialist programs.
1934 Stalin launches a purge of the Communist Party in Russia.
1935 John Maynard Keynes proposes a new economic theory.
1937 Krystallnacht occurs in Germany in response to the
assassination of a German diplomat by a Jewish assassin in Paris.
1939 World War II begins when Germany invades Poland and Britain and
France subsequently declare war on Germany. World War II is an
unacceptable war and causes massive damage to Europe.
1941 Japan attacks Pearl Harbor in Hawaii. The United States enters
World War II.
1942 The Wannsee Conference is held in Berlin. The Nazis decide to
imprison and expel the Jews in Germany.
1945 The United Nations is established in New York City.
1947 The Cold War between the Capitalist nations and Communist
Russia begins.
1948 Israel is established in Palestine, supported by the United
States and Britain.
1949 China becomes a Communist nation, led by Chairman Mao.
1950 The United States goes to war with Korea.
1953 Jewish spies Julius and Ethel Rosenberg are executed for giving
nuclear bomb secrets to Russia.
1954 The U.S. Supreme Court bans racial segregation.
1956 Israel defeats Egypt in the Sinai Campaign.
1959 Fidel Castro leads the Communist revolution in Cuba, supported
by Russia.
1960 The birth control pill is introduced.
1962 The Cuban Missile Crisis occurs.
1963 The United States government orders the assassination of Diem
in Vietnam.
1963 American President John F. Kennedy is assassinated.
1963 Jewish feminist Betty Friedan publishes The Feminine Mystique.
1964 The U.S. Congress passes the Civil Rights Act.
1964 U.S. President Lyndon B. Johnson proposes a Great Society.
1965 The US Immigration Act of 1965 is approved by Congress. This
immigration act was developed by the Jewish politicians Senator
Javitz, Representative Lautenberg, and Representative Cellar. It was
designed to replace White Americans with foreigners and thereby
destroy traditional White America.
1965 American President Lyndon Johnson introduces national racial
preference laws and Affirmative Action programs.
1965 The Vietnam War begins when the United States sends 200,000
troops to Vietnam.
1966 The National Organization for Women is established.
1967 Israel defeats Arab nations in the Six Day War.
1968 American presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy is
assassinated.
1973 The U.S. Supreme Court rules that women have a right to
abortion.
1973 Israel defeats Egypt and Syria in the Yom Kippur War.
1974 U.S. president Richard Nixon is forced to resign due to the
Watergate scandal.
1975 The Vietnam War ends when the communists capture Saigon. The
United States government brings hundreds of thousands of Vietnamese
people to America.
1986 The European Union is established.
1991 A United Nations coalition led by the USA goes to war with
Iraq.
1991 Communism is terminated in Russia.
1994 Apartheid is terminated in South Africa.
1994 California voters pass Proposition 187 to restrict government
aid to illegal immigrants.
1995 Israeli prime minister Yitzhak Rabin is assassinated by Jewish
right wing student Yigal Amir.
1998 The United States and its allies bomb Iraq.
1999 The United States and its allies bomb Serbia.
2000 American President Bill Clinton declares in the State of the
Union address that European Americans will be a minority group within
50 years. This drastic change is due to mass immigration imposed by
ZOG.
2000 European Americans become a minority in California due to mass
immigration.
2000 Jewish senator Joe Lieberman is selected as the American
Democratic vice presidential candidate.
2000 Jews and Palestines battle each other in Israel.
2001 Jewish politicians and journalists criticize Senator John
Ashcroft for his religious beliefs and conservatism, implying that he
is a racist.
2001 Jewish Hollywood releases more television shows and movies that
promote interracial couples, such as "The West Wing" and "Save the
Last Dance".
2001 Holocaust Day is observed on January 27 in Britain in an
attempt to legitimize the Holocaust industry.
2001 Jewish servant President Bill Clinton leaves office, and is
replaced by Jewish servant President George W. Bush.
2001 The Jewish Conspiracy continues without substantial resistance.
============
(3) MAJOR JEWISH CONSPIRATORS
* Madeline Albright, secretary of state, USA
* Leo Moritz Amery, politician, Britain
* Bernard Baruch (1870-1965), banker, USA
* Menachim Begin (1913-1992), politician, Israel
* Judah Benjamin (1810-1880), Confederate politician, USA
* David Ben-Gurion (1886-1973), politician, Israel
* Theodor Bethmann-Hollweg, WWI foreign minister, Germany
* Leon Blum (1872-1950), politician, France
* Franz Boas (1880-1940), sociologist, USA
* Barbara Boxer (1940), senator, USA
* Louis Brandeis (1856-1941), judge, USA
* Edgar Bronfman (1929), distiller, Canada
* Emanuel Cellar (1900-1970), congressman, USA
* Winston Churchill, prime minister, war monger, Britain
* Andre Citroen (1879-1935), industrialist, France
* Leon Czolgosz (1880-1902), assassin, USA
* Isaac Da Costa, slave trader, Britain, USA
* Alan Dershowitz (1938), lawyer, USA
* Benjamin Disraeli (1804-1881), prime minister, Britain
* Alfred Dreyfus (1859-1935), officer, France
* Felix Frankfurter (1882-1965), judge, USA
* Sigmund Freud (1856-1939), psychologist, Austria
* Betty Friedan (1921), feminist, USA
* Milton Friedman (1912), economist, USA
* Goldman, banker, USA
* Samuel Gompers (1850-1924), labor organizer, USA
* Alan Greenspan (1930), banker, USA
* Joseph Hertz (1872-1946), rabbi, South Africa
* Theodor Herzl (1860-1904), politician, Austria
* Jacob Javits, senator, USA
* Henry Kissinger (1923), politician, USA
* Irving Krystol, politician, USA
* Bill Krystol (1940), politician, USA
* Frank Lautenberg, senator, USA
* Hebert Lehman (1878-1963), banker, USA
* Vladimir Lenin (1870-1924), politician, Russia
* Joseph Lieberman (1930), senator, USA
* Aaron Lopez, slave trader, Portugal
* Karl Marx (1818-1883), politician, Germany
* Louis Mayer (1885-1957), film maker, USA
* Doris Meissner (1940), immigration director, USA
* Howard Metzenbaum (1920), senator, USA
* Moses Montefiore (1784-1885), businessman, Britain
* Henry Morgenthau, Sr. politician, USA
* Henry Morgenthau, Jr. (1891-1967), politician, USA
* Adolph Ochs (1858-1935), newspaper publisher, USA
* Oppenheim, diamond dealer, South Africa
* William Paley (1901-1990), television executive, USA
* Gavrilo Princip (1895-1917), assassin, Serbia
* Franklin Delano Roosevelt, president, war monger, USA
* Theodore Roosevelt, president, USA
* Julius Rosenberg, spy, USA
* Ethel Rosenberg, spy, USA
* Mayer Rothschild (1743-1812), banker, Germany
* Amshel Rothschild, banker, Germany
* Nathan Rothschild, banker, Britain
* James Rothschild, banker, France
* Salomon Rothschild, banker, Austria
* Carl Rothschild, banker, Italy
* Rubin, banker, USA
* Herbert Samuel, oil producer, Britain
* David Sarnoff (1891-1971), radio executive, USA
* Sassoon family, merchants, Britain
* Jacob Schiff (1847-1920), banker, USA
* Charles Schumer (1940), senator, USA
* Bugsy Segal, organized crime boss, USA
* Arial Sharon (1929), military leader, Israel
* George Soros (1930), banker, Hungary
* Arlen Specter (1930), senator, USA
* Jack Straw (1940), politician, Britain
* Leon Trotsky (1879-1940), politician, Russia
* Paul Volker (1920), banker, USA
* Felix Warburg (1871-1937), banker, USA
* Max Warburg, banker, Germany
* Casper Weinberger (1920), politician, USA
* Chaim Weizmann (1874-1952), politician, Britain, Israel
* Paul Wellstone (1950), senator, USA
* Woodrow Wilson, president, war monger, USA
* Stephen Wise (1874-1949), rabbi, USA
============
(4) JEWISH BUSINESSES
The Jews own and/or control many large corporations that you may want
to boycott or avoid, including:
* Columbia Broadcasting System (CBS)
* DeBeers Diamond Syndicate
* Dell Computers
* Disney and the American Broadcasting Company
* Goldman - Sachs investment bank
* Lehman Brothers investment bank
* McDonald's Restaurants
* Metro Goldwyn Mayer motion picture studio
* Microsoft
* National Broadcasting Company (NBC)
* The New York Times newspaper
* Paramount motion picture studio
* Salomon Brothers Investment Bank
* Viacom-MTV
============
(5) SECRET JEWS
Most Jews avoid revealing their ethnicity to Gentiles. This deception
allows them to blend into Gentile society without being considered
foreigners. This deception is a form of fraud that should be
considered illegal. Secret Jews are also called crypto-Jews. In many
notable cases, secret Jews have reached the highest levels of power in
European society. Some examples are given below:
* Madeline Albright, secretary of state, USA
* Leo Moritz Amery, half Jew, friend of Churchill, Britain
* Winston Churchill, half Jew on mother's side, politician and war
monger, Britain
* Franklin Delano Roosevelt (Rosenfeld), president and war monger,
USA
* Theodore Roosevelt, president, USA
* Harry Truman, president, USA
* Woodrow Wilson, president and war monger, USA
============
(6) JEWISH GANGSTERS
Several Jews are involved in organized crime, including prostitution,
pornography, drugs, smuggling, slavery, gambling, murder for hire, and
racketeering. Some examples are:
* Albert Anastasia, leader of Murder, Inc.
* Lepke Buchalter
* Buggsy Goldstein
* Aaron Lopez, slave trader
* Meyer Lansky
* Abe Reles
* Arnold Rothstein, the Moses of the underworld
* Dutch Schultz
* Jacob Shapiro
* Bugsy Siegal, founder of Las Vegas
* Harry Strauss, murderer
* Mendy Weiss
* Charlie Workman, murderer
Source: Tough Jews by Rich Cohen (1998)
============
(7) CONCLUSIONS
1. The European people must terminate the Jewish Conspiracy
immediately to ensure their survival and prosperity.
2. The Jewish conspirators should confess to the Jewish Conspiracy
and negotiate for reparations.
============
(8) REFERENCES
1. Jewish History in 100 Nutshells by Pasachoff and Littman (1995)
2. Jewish History and Culture by Rabbi Blech (1999)
3. A History of the Jews by Paul Johnson (1987)
4. Jewish Power by Goldberg
5. Judaism by Pilkington (1995)
6. The Rothschilds by Morton (1961)
7. The Protocols of the Elders of Zion (1905)
8. World History from 1500
9. What Everyone Should Know about the 20th Century
10. How the First World War Began by McCullough (1999)
11. World War I by Marshall
12. World War II by Sulzberber
13. The Creature from Jekyll Island by Griffin
14. The International Jew by Ford
15. Nicholas and Alexandra by Massie
16. The King James Bible
16. In Retrospect by McNamara
17. A Republic, not an Empire by Pat Buchanan
18. The Great Betrayal by Pat Buchanan
19. Alien Nation by Peter Brimelow
20. The Communist Manifesto by Marx and Engels
21. Das Kapital by Karl Marx
22. The 70 Greatest Conspiracies of All Time by Vankin and Whalen
23. American History by Axelrod (1996)
24. Modern European History by Barber
25. Churchill's War by David Irving
26. The Civil War by Catton
27. Chutzpah by Dershowitz
28. Anthropology and Modern Life by Boas
29. Others Unknown: The United States vs. Tim McVeigh by Stephen
Jones
30. Day of Deceit: The Attack on Pearl Harbor by Stinnett
31. Secrets of the Temple: The Federal Reserve System by xxx
32. Tough Jews by Rich Cohen (1998)
33. The Rothschilds by Niall Ferguson (1999)
============
(9) Links
Return to the Anti-Semitism Portal
============
(10) NOTES
1. E-mail your comments and questions to: crg...@yahoo.com
2. This document will be updated on a regular basis.
============
This page is courtesy of the American National Conference.
*** The Jewish Conspiracy ***
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
e:
>
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ENVIRONMENTALISM versus IMMIGRATION: AN ARYAN OVERVIEW
> > by Eric Thomson
> >
> > The knowledgeable Aryan observer can analyze ongoing issues from a
> > racial perspective: is it good or bad for Whites? Once we understand
> > that this is our only relevant question, all matters and issues fall
> > into their proper place in the cosmos. The jews have always asked, "is
> > it good for the jews?" This question is the basis of jewish survival
> > and success. It is also the basis of Aryan extinction and failure. It
> > is high time that every White should ask himself, "is this good for
> > Whites?" before making every decision.
> >
> > Is it good for Whites to have expensive addictions? To be in debt to
> > jew-banksters? To entrust our children to racial traitors and aliens?
> > If you answer "no!" then it is up to you to start defending Our Race
> > by defending your own Aryan interests. It is never too soon and never
> > too late to think in terms of Our Race: "Is it good for Whites?"
> >
> > We cannot afford to take Our Race for granted. We cannot afford to
> > subordinate Aryan Survival to philosophical games and disembodied
> > principles. Least of all should we place an alien cult of
> > anti-Aryanism ahead of the survival of Our Race. What good are Aryan
> > laws, Aryan ideals and Aryan inventions without Aryans?
> >
> > It is the bane of Our Race that we are prone to confuse means with
> > ends. The only end toward which we must strive is the survival of Our
> > Race. All issues, matters, principles, philosophies, laws, religions
> > and activities must serve The White Race. If we do not put Our Race
> > first, the jews will continue to exterminate us with every means at
> > their disposal, just as they have been doing for thousands of years.
> >
> > The Peloponnesian Wars extinguished Aryan Greece, just as World Wars I
> > and II may have been the death knell of Aryan Europe -- and beyond.
> > The ancient wars between Sparta and Athens and their allies were
> > strikingly similar to the modern wars between Germany and Britain and
> > their allies. In both genocidal conflicts, ancient and modern, the
> > root cause was jewish gold and jewish control of Athens' and Britain's
> > money. In both cases Our Race was enslaved and annihilated on behalf
> > of predatory jewish money merchants. Although this was a "good" thing
> > for jews, it was certainly not "good" for Aryans. One historical
> > observer was given to comment about these ancient and modern wars with
> > the epitaph, "Our Race We Slew For the Inner jew." This epitaph
> > applies to millions upon millions of Whites who were slain by their
> > fellow Whites for millennia and whose bones lie scattered throughout
> > the world in unmarked and unhonored graves.
> >
> > With the introduction of Christianity into White living space, Whites
> > plunged into an internecine bloodbath of conquest and forced
> > conversion: "baptism or death!" A short time later, goaded by
> > Christianity, the best of Our Race was squandered in the Crusades.
> > Then came the Protestant version of Christianity and with it, The
> > Thirty Years' War, which killed some two-thirds of White Europeans.
> >
> > The jewish strategy of 'divide and destroy' proceeded apace. Aryans
> > were called upon to slay one another over such issues as "monarchy
> > versus republicanism", "nationalism versus imperialism", "clericalism
> > versus Freemasonry", et al. Jewish power grew as Aryans slew one
> > another in defense of or in pursuit of these nebulous phantoms. As if
> > such divisive issues were not enough to drain Our Race of its best
> > blood, the jews added Marxism, the secular version of Christianity, to
> > their witches' brew. Now, Aryans could be divided into many
> > conflicting groups, including "communists versus capitalists"!
> >
> > Many Aryans are baffled when they learn that there are jews at the
> > forefront in the promoting of every issue. There are even "jewish
> > Nazis!" Erroneously, such Aryans conclude that "there is no jewish
> > conspiracy". These Aryans are truly baffled when they learn that one
> > and the same jew actively supports BOTH sides of an issue, or ALL
> > sides in a war. It is no secret that the Rothschilds and their ilk
> > lend money to all combatants in a conflict; nor is it any secret that
> > jew-capitalists financed jew-communists from 1917 onwards. The
> > talmudic team of Marx and Engels promoted proletarian revolution while
> > living like feudal barons off the profits of exploited labor. Judah
> > Benjamin, Confederate Secretary of Treasury, had no qualms at fleeing
> > Southern Separatism to leap into the lap of British Imperialism, where
> > he drafted The Articles of Confederation, under which the British
> > Crown ruled Canada. Such judeo-capitalists as Armand Hammer and the
> > Rockefellers openly supported their supposed archenemies, the
> > judeo-communists. Rockefeller banksters bragged in full-page ads that
> > their Moscow H.Q. was located at Number One Karl Marx Place! I was
> > impressed by the fact that the Soviet radio in Moscow relied upon a
> > jew named Posner for its English broadcasts, while the U.S. radio
> > relied on another jew named Posner for commentary on Soviet
> > broadcasts. Were there two Posners or just one? It was hard to tell
> > any difference.
> >
> > These ostensible 'contradictions' in the jewish nature even lead some
> > Aryans to take pity on "the poor jews" who have become paranoid and
> > schizophrenic because of centuries of "persecution". When an Aryan
> > thinks racially, however, these 'contradictions' vanish, for he has
> > learned to distinguish between means and ends. The jew uses all issues
> > to achieve his end; enhancement of jewish power. Just as a carpenter
> > may use a saw, a drill, a plane and a hammer to achieve his desired
> > result. When each tool has performed its task, it is set aside and
> > replaced by another. Politics, religions, philosophies, economic
> > programs, et al, are simply tools which the jew picks up or discards,
> > according to his purpose. This explains the current wardrobe change in
> > the erstwhile Soviet Jewnion. Kosher commissars have swapped their
> > uniforms for capitalist-style business suits. The wrapper is
> > different, but the content remains the same.
> >
> > The Aryan religious writer, Savitri Devi, noted the sudden unification
> > of all Dark Age forces against Germany's Aryan Renaissance:
> > judeo-christianity, judeo-communism and judeo-capitalism suddenly
> > dropped their pretended antagonisms in an all-out struggle against the
> > Aryan Savior, Adolf Hitler. The touted differences were the sham; the
> > reality was the eternal unity of these jewish creatures against The
> > White Race. There is no more conflict between judeo-christianity,
> > judeo-communism and judeo-capitalism than there is between a hammer,
> > plane or saw! All are means, not ends, as we have noted.
> >
> > I am reminded of a little chat I had with a jewess, who had chosen to
> > sit next to me on a bus. Although she never mentioned to me that she
> > was jewish, I can spot a jew without so much as donning a pair of
> > those special sunglasses from that revealing movie, "They Live!" We
> > fell into a discussion about Africa. The jewess was in favor of "Black
> > Rule". The Blacks were the majority, so the Whites must hand over
> > power to them and get out, she opined. I not only agreed with her, but
> > I said the same policy should be applied here in North America.
> > Suddenly, she became a champion of "minority rights"! I concluded by
> > saying that the only consistency in her arguments was that she was
> > anti-White. Thus ended the conversation. "They Live, We Sleep,"
> >
> > The antagonism one would anticipate between such ostensibly
> > contradictory policies as 'no growth', environmentalism and 'infinite
> > growth' immigration is nonexistent, to my knowledge. On the contrary,
> > both policies are promoted by very much the same groups and
> > individuals in the Zionist media and government, as well as the
> > schools and universities. Only a jew-wise racialist can discern the
> > fact that these policies are not two opposing spear points, but two
> > prongs of a spear which is aimed at the Aryan heart. We saw it first
> > with Zero Population Growth (ZPG). According to Zionist propaganda,
> > this was a panacea for the world's ills in general and for the ills of
> > North America and Europe in particular. As we know, ZPG applies only
> > to Whites, for it creates vacant living space for the hordes of
> > colored invaders. For non-Whites, birth-control is deemed "racist" and
> > "genocidal". The jews constantly remind us that only Whites can
> > practice racism and genocide and that we can never be the victims of
> > such policies. But we are! The White People are the most endangered
> > species on Planet Earth.
> >
> > The so-called Una-bomber was an outstanding example of this jew World
> > Order bipolarity: on one hand, he wanted the eradication of all
> > Post-Columbian industry; on the other, he romanticized the
> > fast-breeding mestizos and wanted them to fill the continent with
> > their brown bodies. Poor fellow! In order to experience the 'joys' of
> > primitivism, along with population, all he had to do was move to
> > Bangladesh. I recommend that his fellow Zionist zombies do likewise.
> > Look at all the postage it would save, plus all the fuss and bother of
> > preparing parcel bombs.
> >
> > The jewish authors of The Morgenthau Genocide Plan, the only plan for
> > genocide hatched during World War II, aimed their murderous scheme at
> > the German people. The Plan first appeared in book form entitled
> > "Germany Must Perish" by Theodore N. Kaufman. (This book is available
> > from Liberty Bell Publications for U.S. $7, including postage and
> > handling in the USA.) The genocide plan was elaborated by such jewish
> > writers as Louis Nizer ("What to do with Germany?") and Hans
> > Morgenthau Jr. ("Germany is Our Problem!"). It was Morgenthau who
> > directed the drafting of the Allied extermination program,which was
> > appropriately named after him.
> >
> > The Una-bomber and his ilk want to de-industrialize North America. The
> > Morgenthau Plan eagerly anticipated the death of two-thirds of the
> > German people from this policy alone! The remainder of the population
> > would 'disappear' from starvation and sterilization. As we know, The
> > Morgenthau Genocide Program began as soon as the German government
> > signed the documents of military capitulation. The entire civilian
> > population was put on starvation rations, German military personnel
> > were deemed "Disarmed Enemy Forces", rather than "Prisoners of War" by
> > the non-White General Eisenhower. This new definition permitted him to
> > deny the German prisoners any of the protection accorded them under
> > the Hague and Geneva Conventions. Thus stripped of their rights, the
> > Germans were also stripped of their food, clothing and shelter, they
> > died in their thousands from starvation, disease and exposure in
> > barbed wire cattle pens, as eager anti-Whites stood guard to shoot any
> > who tried to escape. It is important to remember that many of the
> > anti-Whites were themselves White. America's "gallant Soviet allies"
> > were no less murderous on their side of the Zionist-Soviet "Iron
> > Curtain". The so-called Cold War was indeed a war directed against the
> > prisoner populations of West and East. No war ever existed between
> > banksters and bolsheviks, capitalists and communists. It was a jew's
> > war and a Gentile's fight all along, designed to gull and cull the
> > dumb Goyim. That's us!
> >
> > Once The Morgenthau Genocide Plan had sufficiently starved and
> > terrorized the Germans in to submission, the re-enslaved Germans were
> > put to work on behalf of Zionist interests, just as they remain today.
> > The jews can thereby enjoy the fruits of German industry while they
> > eliminate the Germans with their policies of White ZPG race-mixing and
> > non-White immigration. Does it sound familiar, White Man? Yes, the
> > very same policies apply to North Americans who supposedly "won" World
> > War II. We have allowed the jews to put our necks in the same noose as
> > Germans and we did not even fight. On the contrary, we rammed our
> > collective neck into the jewish noose with self-righteous enthusiasm.
> > Most White Americans are no different from the lemmings of "Heaven's
> > Gate" or Jonestown, when we get down to basics: "To be or not to be."
> > Do lemmings find 'safety in numbers'?
> >
> > North America's bloated population cannot exist without its industrial
> > and agricultural base, the result of White invention and diligence.
> > This is what presently attracts and supports the non-White influx: the
> > high standard of living which stems from the means of White
> > productivity. Environmentalists note that this productivity is already
> > stretched to its maximum limits, for the 'dark side' of such intensive
> > productivity is environmental pollution and depletion. It is therefore
> > erroneous to hold the absurd belief that we can decrease our
> > industrial base AND increase our population. Both must be decreased
> > drastically, for the survival of Our Race. The question is, how?
> >
> > If the Una-bomber and his ilk were to get their collective wish, North
> > America would be returned to its pristine, pre-Columbian state. All
> > non-aboriginals would have to go "somewhere else." The present
> > population of so-called Indians, now mestizos, would be reduced to its
> > previous numbers, before the White influx. Life would resume its
> > 'idyllic' savage course: nasty, brutish and short; no electricity, no
> > TV, no washing machines, no refrigerators, no soap, no hot water, no
> > toilets, no showers, no cars and no disposable diapers - to mention a
> > few items. No wonder the Una-bomber never found a woman of any color
> > willing to marry him! No mestiza wants to 'enjoy' the Una-bomber's
> > chosen lifestyle, for that is what she fled from in her own land and
> > culture.
> >
> > The Una-bomber and his kosher cohorts would love to impose his
> > lifestyle on all Whites, just as the bankster-bolshevik jews imposed
> > their 'proletarian' poverty upon the Gentile masses of The Soviet
> > Jewnion. But never would they think of imposing such standards upon
> > themselves! As British General J.F.C. Fuller noted: "Lenin promised
> > the Russians a workers' paradise. What he gave them was a bankers'
> > paradise!" If we are to understand jewish parlance, we must understand
> > that "some are more equal than others", just as Orwell noted. When
> > jews spew their vaporings about "humanity" they only mean themselves.
> > Like it or not, that is always the outcome of jewish policies which we
> > so foolishly support. "Communism" for the jews is poverty for us and
> > plutocracy for them. "Capitalism" has the same result. Only a
> > jew-dazed Gentile would see them as opposites.
> >
> > Can Aryans find a solution to the dual problems of
> > over-industrialization and over-population? Of course we can, but only
> > if we become self-governing, within our own living-space. Every day,
> > in every way, we must, through our thoughts and actions, determine the
> > destruction of the ZOG (Zionist Occupation Government) and the
> > departure of the wogs. Only an Aryan State can make White Survival
> > possible. Every step we take must be toward this goal. No task is too
> > daunting for those of us who want the best for Our Race. Won't this be
> > good for Aryans?
> >
> > April 1997
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
james grogan
consumed by jealousy.
"wally" <irelan...@yahoogroups.com> wrote in message
news:914462ca.01120...@posting.google.com...
Tobie L. anderson
You really are a sick fuck aren't you?
"T" Viking
Wild Colonial Boy
Some might be but you're making a general statement which you cannot
know to be true in every case.
I would agree that it is wrong to be 'anti-Gentile' but, personally, I
have no problem with people being pro-themselves as I'm sure you are
pro-European.
>4. Jews have resisted assimilation with Gentiles throughout history
>while living as a minority group within Gentile society.
This is true but so what? People ought to have a right to
self-determination as long as that right doesn't conflict with other's
sel-determination rights.
>5. Judaism is an ethnic religion that is intended for Jews only.
This is true but so what? We had ethnic religions in Northern Europe
as well - before Charlemagne.
>6. Judaism itself is pro-Jewish and anti-Gentile.
Is it?
>7. Judaism discourages Gentiles from converting to Judaism or
>intermarrying with Jews.
This is true.
>8. Jews consider themselves to be God's Chosen People and superior to
>Gentiles, as
>described in Exodus 18.
This is not supported within the chapter Exodus 18. I've just had a
look and there isn't even a mention of the word Gentile. I specially
made sure that I had a look at the King James as well. Check it
yourself at
http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?passage=EXOD+18&language=english&version=KJV
>9. The Jews are the only ethnic group with sufficient financial power
>and political power to effectively attack European society from
>within.
This is probably true but whether they will do this or not is another
matter.
>10. The Jews have been predators and parasites within European
>society throughout history.
Prove this assertion.
>11. The European people of the world have been under attack and in
>decline since World War I began in 1914 primarily due to the Jewish
>conspiracy.
Prove this assertion.
>12. The Jews control the banking and monetary systems.
There is something in this.
>13. The Jews control the media corporations in television, radio,
>publishing, and the press.
Not completely and now with the advent of the internet there is the
opportunity to right the wrongs but you aren't doing very well so far.
>14. The Jews control the United States government and the European
>governments. This is called the Zionist Occupation Government (ZOG).
By bigots it is.
>15. Jews attempt to eliminate discussion of the Jewish conspiracy by
>accusing Gentiles of antisemitism, racism, persecution, and
>discrimination. They use censorship to aggressively suppress
>criticism of their culture.
Certainly these things should be debated. Truth will out and will show
you and the Zionist block for being the liars they are.
>16. The Jews monopolize several major industries such as oil,
>diamonds, electronics, and software.
Prove this assertion.
>17. The Jews have been allowed to live in freedom in the United
>States, Canada, Britain, Germany, France, and other European nations
>for hundreds of years. However, the Jews have waged a long term race
>war against their host nations.
Prove this assertion.
>18. The Jewish conspirators are motivated by hatred, violence,
>destruction, racism, greed, and competition.
Prove this assertion.
>19. The Jews use any and all methods to attack European society,
>including war, revolution, crime, propaganda, laws, and deception.
Prove this assertion.
>20. The evidence given above, taken together, shows that the Jewish
>Conspiracy to control the world and destroy European society does
>exist.
Its not evidence its a bunch of unsupported assertions.
>============
>
>(2) THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY TIMELINE: 1000 AD to 2000 AD
>
>This timeline describes the historical events of the Jewish Conspiracy
>over the past 1000 years.
>
>1066 Jews enter England with the Norman Invasion and establish
>banks.
>
>1255 Hugh of Lincoln is ritually murdered by Jews in England.
?
>1290 The Jews are expelled from England by King Edward I due to
>their anti-British culture.
>
>1492 Christopher Columbus discovers America.
What has this got to do with anything? In any event the native
Americans discovered it first and the first Europeans to make it to
North America were either Vikings or Irish monks.
>1492 The Spanish Inquisition begins. The Jews are expelled from
>Spain. Some Jews, called Marranos, convert to Catholicism but
>secretly practice Judaism.
How evil of them <snort>
>1620 Jewish slave traders bring slaves to America.
Really? Prove this assertion. It was my understanding that they
financed the ships rather than the actuall transporting of the slaves
themselves.
>1655 Cromwell allows Jews to return to England.
So?
>1694 The Bank of England is established.
So?
>1740 Jewish slave trader Aaron Lopez brings thousands of slaves to
>America.
Lopez? That doesn't sound very Jewish to me.
>1760 The Board of Deputies of British Jews is established in
>Britain.
So?
>1770 Jewish banker Mayer Rothschild establishes a bank in Frankfurt,
>Germany. In subsequent years the five sons of Mayer Rothschild,
>Nathan, James, Salomon, Carl, and Amschel, established banks in
>London, Paris, Frankfurt, Vienna, and Naples, forming an international
>network of banks. The Rothschild banks provide major loans to the
>governments of Europe, thereby gaining political power. The banks
>also finance European wars, thereby profiting from warfare. The
>Rothschild family is strongly pro-Jewish and have been major players
>in the ZOG conspiracy.
This is evidence. If you can add more supporting proof then you might
be getting somewhere.
>1775 The American Revolution begins. Jewish banker Haym Salomon
>provides financial support.
So? What's the point?
>1776 The Illuminati secret society is established by Jewish agent
>Adam Weishaupt in Germany.
Prove this assertion and its significance.
>1789 The French Revolution begins.
So?
>1793 King Louis XVI of France is guillotined by the French
>Revolutionaries.
So?
>1805 The Napoleonic Wars begin.
So?
>1815 Napoleon is defeated at the Battle of Waterloo in Belgium.
>Nathan Rothschild receives early news of Napoleon's defeat, and
>manipulates the English bond market, acquiring English bonds at
>heavily discounted prices.
Prove this assertion.
>1830 The Rothschilds finance the establishment of the nation of
>Belgium, which secedes from the Netherlands.
Prove this assertion.
>1837 Benjamin Disraeli becomes the first Jewish member of parliament
>in Britain.
So?
>1848 Jewish politician Karl Marx publishes the Communist Manifesto.
Political writer yes, politician? In what sense?
>1853 The Jewish B'nai B'rith (Sons of the Covenant) organization is
>established in New York City.
So? Whats the point?
>1858 Baron Lionel de Rothschild becomes a member of parliament in
>Britain.
>
>1859 The Rothschilds decide to support the South in the American
>slavery dispute.
Prove this assertion.
>1859 The Rothschilds finance the construction of the Suez Canal.
>
>1861 The American Civil War begins, threatening to divide the USA
>into two nations. The war lasts for 4 years and causes vast
>destruction to the USA. Jewish lawyer Judah Benjamin is attorney
>general, secretary of war, and secretary of state for the Confederacy.
>
>1865 President Abraham Lincoln is assassinated by John Wilkes Booth
>and a group of several co-conspirators. Judah Benjamin flees to
>England.
Is there a connection between J Booth and J Benjamin?
>1867 Karl Marx publishes Das Kapital.
So?
>1868 Benjamin Disraeli becomes the first Jewish prime minister of
>Britain.
So?
>1869 Jewish banker Jay Gould attempts to corner the American gold
>market.
So?
>1870 France attacks Germany, starting the Franco-Prussian war.
So?
>1870 John D. Rockefeller establishes Standard Oil.
>
>1871 The Rothschilds finance France's war reparations to Germany.
>
>1881 Russian Czar Alexander II is assassinated by Jewish
>conspirators.
Prove this assertion.
>1882 Millions of East European Jews begin to immigrate to the USA.
So?
>1890 The Rothschilds finance Jewish colonies in Palestine.
So?
>1891 France and Russia form a military alliance, threatening
>Germany.
So fucking what?
>1894 Alfred Dreyfus, a Jewish captain in the French army, is
>convicted of giving secrets to Germany.
So what?
>1896 Theodor Herzl organizes the First Zionist Congress in Basel,
>Switzerland. He proposes the creation of a Jewish nation in Palestine
>in his document The Jewish State.
And thats caused a lot of trouble since alright.
>1898 The United States goes to war with Spain over a mysterious
>explosion on the battleship Maine docked in Havana, Cuba. Jewish
>publisher Joseph Pulitzer encourages starting a war in his newspaper,
>New York World.
So?
>1899 Britain goes to war with the Dutch Boers of South Africa to
>capture the gold mines and diamond mines for the Jews. Britain
>detains Boer civilians in concentration camps. Thousands of Boer men,
>women, and children are killed.
So?
>1901 American President William McKinley is assassinated by Jewish
>radical Leon Czolgosz.
Is that a Jewish name?
>1901 The Anglo-Japanese Alliance is signed. This enables Japan to
>prepare for war with Russia.
So?
>1901 Rothschild partner J.P. Morgan bank establishes the United
>States Steel corporation.
So?
>1904-1905 Japan attacks the Russian navy at Port Arthur in China,
>starting the Russo-Japanese War. Jewish banker Jacob Schiff of New
>York City provides 200 million dollars in war loans to Japan.
Prove this assertion.
>1904 France and Britain sign the Anglo-French Entente, threatening
>Germany. France and Britain initiate secret military conferences to
>prepare for war.
So?
>1905 Radical Socialists, led by Jewish politicians Vladimir Lenin and
>Leon Trotsky, organize a revolution against the Russian government.
>The revolution is terminated by the government, but the government
>agrees to some concessions.
>
>1905 The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion is received by the
>British Museum. This document, which may be authentic, describes a
>Jewish plan to destroy European civilization and rule the world. Many
>of the events described in the Protocols have subsequently occurred.
Why don't you post the contents of this document here in the
newsgroup?
>1905 Jewish intellectual Sigmund Freud publishes his theories on
>psychology.
Ah so fucking what?
>1907 The Anglo-Russian Agreement is signed.
So?
>1907 The Triple Entente of France, Russia, and Britain is
>established. This alliance encircles Germany and threatens the
>security of Germany. The preconditions for World War I are now
>established.
So? What is teh connection with Jewry here?
>1908 The Young Turks revolt in Turkey.
Yeah? So fucking what?
>1909 The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People
>(NAACP) is established by the Jewish politicians for the
>African-Americans.
<sigh>
>1909 British Oil booms in the Middle East.
So?
>1912 Woodrow Wilson is elected president of the USA. Wilson, a
>liberal Democrat, is financed by Jewish banker Bernard Baruch.
Prove this assertion.
>1913 The Federal Reserve Bank is established in the USA. Jewish
>banker Felix Warburg is the first chairman of the Federal Reserve.
So?
>1913 The United States imposes a tax on personal income, increasing
>the government's power and wealth.
What is unusual about this?
>1913 The Jewish Anti-Defamation League of the B'nai B'rith is
>established in New York City to oppose anti-semitism.
There is nothing wrong with organising against prejudice if you're a
member of the group that is being prejudged.
>1914 Austria-Hungarian Archduke Franz Ferdinand is assassinated by
>Jewish student Gavrilo Princip and a group of co-conspirators. Pelley
>claims that the assassins were financed by Jewish businessman Herbert
>Samuel of Britain, owner of Shell Oil. This assassination triggers
>World War I in Europe. World War I is an unacceptable war and it
>starts the decline of the European people.
>1914 Margaret Sanger publishes Family Limitations.
????
>1915 A German submarine sinks the Lusitania.
So?
>1917 Under heavy pressure from the Jews and Britain, the United
>States declares war on Germany and enters World War I.
Prove this assertion.
>1917 The Balfour Declaration is announced by the British government,
>creating a Jewish homeland in Palestine. The Declaration is in part a
>reward for Jewish support of the Allies during World War I.
>
>1917 Lenin leads the Communist Revolution in Russia.
So?
>1918 Russian Czar Nicholas II and his family are assassinated by the
>Jewish communists Lenin, Trotsky, and Sverdlov.
>
>1919 The punishing Treaty of Versailles is signed in France. The
>Treaty effectively continues the war against Germany. Jewish American
>banker Bernard Baruch imposes massive financial reparations on
>Germany.
Prove this assertion.
>1924 The United States Congress restricts immigration.
So?
>1929 The New York stock market crashes. A global economic
>depression begins.
>
>1933 Adolph Hitler becomes Chancellor of Germany.
Was he Jewish?
>1933 Jews declare international boycott of Germany.
>
>1933 U.S. president Franklin D. Roosevelt introduces the New Deal
>socialist programs.
So?
>1934 Stalin launches a purge of the Communist Party in Russia.
So?
>1935 John Maynard Keynes proposes a new economic theory.
So?
>1937 Krystallnacht occurs in Germany in response to the
>assassination of a German diplomat by a Jewish assassin in Paris.
Prove this assertion.
>1939 World War II begins when Germany invades Poland and Britain and
>France subsequently declare war on Germany. World War II is an
>unacceptable war and causes massive damage to Europe.
We probably all agree on this but whats your point?
>1941 Japan attacks Pearl Harbor in Hawaii. The United States enters
>World War II.
Japan & Jewry? I don't think so.
>1942 The Wannsee Conference is held in Berlin. The Nazis decide to
>imprison and expel the Jews in Germany.
What does this add to your argument. We all know that the nazis didn't
like Jews.
>1945 The United Nations is established in New York City.
So?
>1947 The Cold War between the Capitalist nations and Communist
>Russia begins.
So?
>1948 Israel is established in Palestine, supported by the United
>States and Britain.
Indeed.
>1949 China becomes a Communist nation, led by Chairman Mao.
So fucking what?
>1950 The United States goes to war with Korea.
So?
>1953 Jewish spies Julius and Ethel Rosenberg are executed for giving
>nuclear bomb secrets to Russia.
Prove this assertion.
>1954 The U.S. Supreme Court bans racial segregation.
What is wrong with this? Do you support racial segregation?
>1956 Israel defeats Egypt in the Sinai Campaign.
>
>1959 Fidel Castro leads the Communist revolution in Cuba, supported
>by Russia.
So what? Is Castro jewish?
>1960 The birth control pill is introduced.
For fucks sake what is the significance here?
>1962 The Cuban Missile Crisis occurs.
So?
>1963 The United States government orders the assassination of Diem
>in Vietnam.
How relevant is this? Not very.
>1963 American President John F. Kennedy is assassinated.
So fucking what?
>1963 Jewish feminist Betty Friedan publishes The Feminine Mystique.
Prove that she's Jewish
>1964 The U.S. Congress passes the Civil Rights Act.
And what is wrong with this?
>1964 U.S. President Lyndon B. Johnson proposes a Great Society.
So?
>(5) SECRET JEWS
>
>Most Jews avoid revealing their ethnicity to Gentiles. This deception
>allows them to blend into Gentile society without being considered
>foreigners. This deception is a form of fraud that should be
>considered illegal.
Ah fuck off you jerk.
So what?
>(7) CONCLUSIONS
>
>1. The European people must terminate the Jewish Conspiracy
>immediately to ensure their survival and prosperity.
>
>2. The Jewish conspirators should confess to the Jewish Conspiracy
>and negotiate for reparations.
?????????????? Are you mad?
Wild Colonial Boy
wally
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
William Dudley Pelley was born in Lynn, Massachusetts in 1890. He died
in Nobelsville, Indiana in 1965. The son of a Protestant minister he
was entirely self-educated and at age 19, published his own
philosophical magazine which was partially international. He was
owner/editor of several newspapers in New England and a successful
journalist. While in Japan on behalf of the YMCA, he was recruited by
our State Department for intelligence work during our short-lived
opposition to the Bolshevik menace occurring in Russia following WW I.
As a witness to the brand of "brotherly love" demonstrated by the
kindly Reds plus the obvious jewishness of the whole operation, he
began his journey towards what we now brand as anti-Semitism. After
returning to the United States, he continued his writing career to the
extent of spending time in jewish Hollywood writing screen plays and
associating with the hoi polloi of the "silent era" of movies. He
coined the phrase "The land of the spree and the home of the knave."
as well as the "casting couch" policy: Don't hire until you've seen
the whites of their thighs.
As early as 1929, Pelley accurately predicted our age of decadence and
depravity as projected by those champions of morality, Springer,
Stern, Hefner, et al. -- jewish to the core. In 1930, he had a
mystical experience about which he wrote a short book later to become
a sort of occult classic. Although having little hope for an America
slowly drowning in a jewish sewer, he nonetheless founded the Silver
Legion noted for the letter "L" on the ties of their uniforms. The
public called his followers Silver Shirts or Silvershirts. During the
years 1934-36, he published a weekly paper in support of his group and
ran for president in 1936 -- the year many agree was the beginning of
WW II following the declaration of economic war upon Germany in 1933
by the jews. The obscene butchery of enemy and innocents alike, during
the Spanish Civil War, by the communists, was only a continuation of
what they have been doing since 1905 -- see the National Geographic
for that year -- not the computerized version which has been made
politically correct!. On July 3, 1936, Pelley's headline was:
OVERTHROW OF HITLER BY WAR! He was the first to label that coming
conflict as the Second World War. Rosenvelt won that year's election
by a landslide and the American voters gladly sold out their nation
and heritage for control by a pottage of jews and their money-grubbing
lackeys. Pelley used the term "holocaust" long before it came into
popular use to describe what the jews had planned for the people of
Germany as evidenced later by the uncalled-for fire-bombing of
Dresden.
Pelley continued writing against our red rule and of course, was
fingered by Roosenvelt for derailment. In 1942, he was arrested for
"sedition" and eventually was jailed. Charles Lindbergh was a
character witness at the trial and Rosenvelt tied to get this
all-American stripped of his military title but public opinion would
have none of this. Pelley was released from prison in 1954 on the
condition that he never write any "anti-Semitic" material again. He
didn't. I believe he is survived by a daughter.
Information on Pelley, and particularly his political writings, is
difficult to come by. Those who have such material guard it closer
than Shylock did his coins or a scarab its dung ball. That's how far
we have dropped as worthwhile individuals. Zündel compulsively hoarded
everything he could lay his hands upon -- sharing not even material
given to him under the pledge of doing so. Then one day, Fate stepped
in and burned the whole dusty mess to the ground. It was a greed
engendered and ego masturbating waste which could have been avoided
but that's the self-destructive blight-wing for you.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OUT OF THEIR OWN MOUTHS.
To the New York Herald Tribune:
Mr. Treister stated in his letter in your paper that the Jewish people
form a very small percentage of the Communists in America. He states
that "... in Chicago, with a Jewish population of 400,000, there are
about 150 Communists."
I myself am Jewish, and I come from Chicago. I spent 13 years in that
city. Approximately 98 percent of us are Communists, and we are not
ashamed of it. It is a system laid down to us by our great leader,
Karl Marx, and only the cowards hide behind "democracy" or
"Americanism." Furthermore, I think Mr. Treister should check up on
his figures more closely if he would give out information.
Sarah Finkelstein, Washington, DC, December 22, 1938
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DUPES OF JUDAH
A Challenge to THE AMERICAN LEGION
by Pelley of the Silvershirts
Shall we go to War this time to save Germany's Jews or Sassoon's
Yellow River Dope Trade?
Chapter I
I want to use a little straight-from-the-shoulder language to the men
of the American Legion!
I want to talk to them about the inside facts concerning a certain War
that twenty years ago made it possible for them to be present Legion
members. It's as plain as the nose on anybody's face that something
like a million American lads went overseas in 1917 to fight a war,
about the causes of which they knew next to nothing.
Even today, two decades after, scarcely one veteran in a thousand
knows the accurate, concise, inside story of why we got into that War,
who got us in, what chestnuts foreign governments pulled out of the
fire -- or had us pull or had us pull out -- and who cracked and ate
those chestnuts after we had been bamboozled into helping rake them
from the coals of European conflict.
It's time all of us had a little enlightenment on how such wars are
made, who makes 'em, and what purposes are served by concocting and
launching 'em.
We certainly know who has to fight 'em!
Understand me, I'm no pacifist. I'm not saying that "war is terrible"
or that it "sets back civilization" or that it kills off the cream and
bead of a nation's manhood while weaklings and profiteers are left to
enjoy any benefits that subsequently come out of it. I think there are
wars that are justified, and that certainly should be fought. I feel
that I did my part in the last War, although it happened that my jerk
concerned the espionage forces on the Eastern Front. What I mean to
say is, I'm not writing this booklet from sentimental reasons or
because my conscience hurts me that I did my World War fighting from a
swivel chair. My gripe about the last War, and my gripe against the
next war -- which they're now cooking up! -- are based on the fact
that being a reasonably sincere American, born and raised in this
country and with forebears in both the Civil and Revolutionary Wars,
it burns me up to see equally sincere and patriotic fighting-men
hoodwinked, hoaxed and hijacked, called to the colors supposedly to
scrap for the nation's integrity, and then really used as sap
cannon-fodder to stop pig-iron in a brawl from which some foreign
clique profits.
In other words, I'm ready and eager to stop my share of the pig-iron
when my country's in danger or when her flag's been insulted. But I've
got enough gray in my hair at last not to get excited or begin any
patriotic screeching when I find that my country's been deliberately
put in danger or her flag's been insulted with malice aforethought to
force her to take sides in some foreign racial squabble.
There's considerable difference!
Right now I'm plenty hot and bothered, and writing specifically for
the men of the American Legion, because I happen to know from
first-hand research that a cold-blooded conspiracy is afoot to get us
stirred up into fighting another foreign war -- and repeating all the
experiences of 1917, if you please! -- for no other reason than that
these radical New-Dealers have made a complete botch of their
crack-pot program and are now frantically seeking an "out" to distract
public attention from that failure and possible reprisals.
The plight of the Jews -- in Germany -- and I'm not at all ready to
admit that it's much of a plight outside of the imaginations of the
paid propagandists -- gives these same New-Dealers precisely the peg
they need and want on which to hang a sudden program for "Americanism"
and armament....
Hitler's a "monster," or so it stacks up to me, because he's beaten
the Jews at their own game of double-cross in Germany and they're
plenty sore about it. So they want us as a nation to go over and
shellac him. Or the Sassoon Yellow-River dope trade is threatened by
the Nipponese in China, and we must get busy and thrash the Mikado.
A couple of years ago the Jews were bragging that Hitler couldn't last
a year. They'd have him over-thrown in jig-time. But Hitler has
lasted, and the Yidds have lost "face." ... If the Germans like
Hitler, that's their business. If the Jews don't like him, I see no
reason for making that our business.
The other day, however, a little undersized Yiddisher runt by the name
of Grynszpan was put up to the job of assassinating one of the Nazi
envoys to Paris -- by the same Jewish big-shots who've been eternally
plotting to overthrow the Nazi regime from the first. The runt bungled
the job and shot the wrong man. He "got" an under-secretary by the
name of Von Rath. Hitler's agents smoked out exactly what had
happened, and when the Nazis rioted against Jews all over, and
assessed a $406,000,000 fine against 'em as a lesson, the Jews over
here said: "Swell! That sort of stuff plays right into our hands. Now
watch us capitalize on it with the American sentimentalists to take
the United States for a final one-way ride!"
Now don't get me wrong! I'm no Nazi propagandist apologizing for
Hitler. I don't believe his brand of government would work for
Americans any more than Stalin's brand of government would work for
Americans. But having kept up a lot of my espionage connections since
the war, I know a thing or two about what goes on behind the scenes.
I know, for instance, that with the "kikes" swarming into the Federal
Administration thicker than midges in fly-time, and with their hate
and chagrin over Hitler added to their vast New-Deal flop, the whole
Von Rath episode -- coupled with Japan's winning of the China War --
give Roosevelt and his White House Sanhedrin precisely the opportunity
they wanted to heat us to war fever anew and engage us with whosoever
stands up to us firmest.
What I have behind my eyebrows to do first is to set forth clearly and
simply -- and in a way that the average Legion man and patriot can
grasp -- just what a mighty piece of skulduggery we were sold upon 'in
1917, and what the "backstairs" truth was, about getting us into the
muddle that killed some fifty thousand lads like you and me,
It's a strange fact, but up till a few weeks ago I'd not been able in
twenty years to find a single piece of literature that set forth in
concise, understandable fashion the naked truth as to why the World
War broke out at all, or why -- having broken out -- it lasted four
years, or why it was required for us to get into it, upsetting the
lives of a hundred million people, shipping a million of them
overseas, and butchering fifty thousand of them just to prove that we
took part in it.
Of course, the average American thinks the War broke out because the
German Kaiser was getting too cocky and rattling his sabre about
Europe till the Allied nations got fed up, on his bombast. Then
somebody killed an Archduke at Sarajevo, and Serbia wouldn't
apologize. Russia mobilized and that scared France and England. Nobody
would back down. All the Allies wanted Germany licked "that the world
might be safe for Democracy." ... After the stramash had been going
three years, a German U-boat sank one of our steamships, killing a
bunch of important Americans. That was an insult we couldn't overlook,
so we too armed and stepped into the fray -- to show we could heave
pig-iron around with the best of 'em, That's the World War -- on paper
-- and in the mind of the average citizen who is average because he
never dreams what all these diplomatic and overseas messes are about.
I plead guilty to being as dumb as the rest of 'em when I started for
the Eastern Front in 1917. But I hadn't been out there long before I
began to learn things: things that never saw the newspapers and were
rarely allowed to get into the dispatches. Being indirectly in the
espionage division, of course I had the chance to learn 'em.
After coming home, however, and living two post-war decades, I never
found a dozen paragraphs, that set forth the true facts in a simple
and compact manner until the other day an American-Hungarian lawyer in
Cleveland by the name of Louis K. Birinyi got out a book Why the
Treaty of Trianon is Void. Being a native Hungarian, Dr. Birinyi was
all worked up over what happened to his country at the Peace
Conference -- or for that matter is still happening in the center of
all this Fascist business in Europe. He sent me a copy of his book,
with an exceedingly complimentary inscription on the flyleaf. I took
it to bed with me one night and started to read it in desultory
manner. I supposed it was "just another" of those literary
post-mortems. Suddenly I found myself broad awake and paying strict
attention. This Cleveland Hungarian was in possession of the facts. He
was tossing 'em out in paragraphs that scoured.
Here at last was the book, and the inside presentation that I had
searched vainly twenty years to find. The Doctor wasn't trying to sell
anything. He wasn't even trying to sell a book written by himself. He
was pouring out his heartbreak on paper, over the fate of his native
country, but in so doing he was spilling the beans all over the place!
I mention Dr. Birinyi's book, not to "plug" sales for it, though it
deserves all the plugging it can get, but because I propose to draw on
a lot of what that Cleveland attorney has got in his pages -- as well
as irrefutable government documents -- and I don't want to filch his
material without credit or conceal my sources. For some reason or
other, I tell you, until the Birinyi book came out there had scarcely
been a line published anywhere that revealed the nature of the
backstairs chicanery that went on, setting Europe afire and killing
fifty thousand of your buddies and mine when we ran with our own
buckets to help put the blaze out.
Somehow or other, looking back on it now, this too wasn't accident.
It was to somebody's advantage to conceal and suppress such facts.
And they have been concealed and suppressed.
Most of you remember, I think, that Woodrow Wilson came back from the
Peace Conference with a gripe to the effect that "there was a power
controlling Europe with which he couldn't cope." I recall reading it
in our American newspapers at the time, and have heard constant
references to it since. Well, with all the high jinks that are going
on at present -- about which I know so much that I might sleep a whole
lot better o' nights if I knew less -- I make the fair deduction that
the same "power" that Wilson confessed he couldn't cope with, might
have had a lot to do with seeing to it that the real story behind the
World War and our share in it, has been kept under pot-lid and the
odor of what was in the pot never allowed to reach the public
nostrils.
Before I'll see the same gang put it over on us again, and send
another fifty thousand fine lads to die in Europe in a repeat
performance, I'll take the pot-cover off myself.
Whether you men of the American Legion can "take it" or not, remains
to be seen. Some of you will undoubtedly get plenty sore. It always
makes a real American sore to find that somebody has played him for a
sucker.
My contention, based on the facts that I'm going to give you, is that
all of us -- not only the lads of the American Legion but the entire
American people -- were played for suckers in 1917 and that the same
conniving crowd is now out to play us for suckers again.
However, to the hot stuff....
Chapter II
Ever since the Armistice, it's a recognized fact, nation after nation
-- and whole blocs of nations -- have been as voluble as an equal
number of old women in a small-town sewing circle, trying to explain
who was responsible for the War. Germany was responsible for the War,
said the British. Russia was responsible, said the German monarchists.
When the crowd of burglars at the Peace Conference got around the
table to divide up the territory of the Central Powers between
themselves, they alibied what they were doing by declaring that
Austria-Hungary was responsible for the War -- because her government
insisted on an apology from the Serbs for the death of an Archduke.
Every nation on earth, at some time or other it appears, has been
charged with responsibility for the World War. Every people who ever
came within sound of a whiz-bang or kicked in ten cents to save a
flock of starving war orphans, has been charged with responsibility
for the World War. The only people to date who haven't been charged
with such responsibility, is the crowd that was responsible. And its
chief job in life has been to cover up.
Perhaps you may ask, "Why go into that? What does it matter who was
responsible at this late day?" I tell you that it makes a whale of a
lot of "matter," in view of the fact that the same mob, never having
been exposed, is up to its former tricks and popping all its
trouser-buttons right now to stage a repeat performance!
Of all the statesmen of the warring countries, Lloyd George of England
is the only one left who dared indicate that somebody caused the war
who hasn't to date been named. On one occasion he apologized for all
the statesmen of all the warring countries by saying that "nobody
quite meant war." ... Here is his blurb, uttered on December 23, 1920,
to the Empire Parliamentary Association: "The more one reads memoirs
and books written in the various countries of what happened before
August, 1914, the more one realizes that no one at the head of affairs
quite meant war. It was something into which they glided, stumbled and
staggered."
On January 6, 1923, in a syndicated article he said: "The more one
examines the events of July, 1914, the more one is impressed with the
shrinking of the nominal rulers of the attacking empires, and with the
relentless driving onward of the military organizations behind these
terror-stricken dummies. No one ever believed that the cause of the
war was the shooting of the Grand Duke of Austria."
In other words, it wasn't kings and kaisers and Prime Ministers and
Chancellors who brought on the Big Slaughter. These were just poor
dummies and stooges. No, it was militarism that brought on the War,
militarism that originated of itself, that expanded of itself, that
moved onward of itself, and that finally shot itself oil with scarcely
an erring human hand to guide it.
What a lovely blob of hooey!
"No one at the head of affairs quite meant war. The "nominal rulers,"
those "terror-stricken dummies," could not of their own will make war.
Emperors, diplomatists and statesmen were unable to prevent war. "The
relentless driving onward of the military organizations behind these
terror-stricken dummies" forced the war ahead.
In other words, little male children of the American Legion, if you
have one Winchester rifle hung on a peg in your home it isn't
particularly dangerous, either to you or to society; but if you get a
big bankroll, and once a week for a period of years buy another
Winchester rifle until your house is so filled with them that you
can't eat or sleep there, the moment will arrive when those guns of
themselves will all want to go bang-bang! They are not so much lumber
in the stocks that might otherwise make chair-legs, or so much iron in
the barrels that might otherwise make engine-housings. By the sheer
fact of being wood and iron, brought together in the pattern of
firearms, they all would a-hunting go and blow the eternal gizzards
out of anyone in front of 'em ! That's what the Lloyd Georges ask us
to believe in regard to world armament.
"Wait a minute," begs the stickler for facts. "You're not quite right.
Of course numbers of guns don't make them explode of themselves. What
Lloyd George meant to say, and practically did say, was that the
existence of great military organizations and over-equipped armies,
made the leaders of those armies just naturally want to fight. It's
the same as putting a loaded revolver in a man's hand. He wants to
sight along the barrel and pull the trigger, just to see if it will
shoot!"
That's generally the idea of how it is, when Militarism comes in for a
raking. And the nitwits nod their heads in approval. But let's not go
off half-cocked. Let's look at this thing.
The "existence of great military organizations makes, them want to
fight." ... Is that so? Ho! ... and likewise Hum! Well, why doesn't
someone name the specific gentlemen in the British Army, or the German
Army, or the French Army, or even in our American Army, who prior to
1914 were so bursting with over-equipped combativeness that the world
just had to fight. Was it Lord Kitchener? Was it Field Marshal Haig?
Was it Ludendorff or Hindenburg? Was it Papa Joffre or Marshal Foch?
Right here at home, have we ever observed that men like General
Leonard Wood, Blackjack Pershing, or General MacArthur, ever spoiled
for a scrap just because they headed up big numbers of fighting-men?
Isn't it a fact that the big-shots at the heads of military machines
deplore the whole business, and feel their responsibilities heaviest
to keep men out of war?
Or go on down through the ranks of any army.
Specifically in the World War -- or before it -- was it the colonels,
the majors, the captains, the first and second lieutenants, or the
top-sergeants, who wanted the war? If so, may we ask since when did
emperors, diplomatists, prime ministers and generals harken to the
gripes of colonels, majors, captains and top-sergeants, that a war
should be started so that they could bang-off their fire-sticks?
Applesauce!
Someone, somewhere, was responsible for creating those great military
machines because someone, somewhere, expected to use 'em! In this day
and age, kings and kaisers and prime ministers and chancellors don't
run amuck up and down the earth, doing as they please in international
diplomacy. They find themselves quickly accountable to parliaments,
reichs, and congresses. The Kitcheners, Haigs, Ludendorffs, Foches and
Pershings don't run amuck with the military machines which they head,
and force the kings and kaisers to fight; they simply follow orders --
like the buck private at the bottom of the system.
If nobody issued the orders from a higher source, then there would
never be a war. That's common sense! So, if we go up the line, past
the sergeants and captains and majors and colonels and generals and
chancellors and prime ministers and kaisers and kings, and find each
of these accountable to some embodiment of authority that's still
higher, we must come to the parliaments and reichs and congresses.
Were they responsible for the World War? Well, whether or not they
were, let's ask ourselves what these parliaments and reichs and
congresses are, but aggregations of people's representatives. But did
they represent common citizens who wanted to get into uniforms and
carve the viscera out of folks across each border? We all know what a
howl went up from the masses as the war-clouds mounted higher!
No! -- midway between the citizenry that had to take time off from
private pursuits to march forth and get shot, and the political and
military bigwigs who took orders from representative parliamentary
bodies and carried 'em out, was some provocative influence that
convinced the people's representatives in all nations that war was
necessary and inevitable. After the convincing had been done -- in
other words, when the militarism had been set in motion -- the rest
was executive detail carried into action.
It's squarely on the shoulders of this Provocative Influence that we
can pin the World War's responsibility -- just as we can pin
additional responsibility right at this moment on the Provocative
Influence now working overtime to touch off a Second World War.
This reasoning is sound, little male children of the American Legion!
Now let's dig into cold, irrefutable, historical fact and see what the
Provocative Influence was, behind the parliaments, reichs, congresses,
and political and military big-shots twenty years ago, that ultimately
landed most of you in France and kept fifty thousand of you there as
very permanent guests....
Chapter III
Those of us who went overseas and had any contact whatever with the
folks of the embattled nations, will be inclined to agree that no
particular country or its nationals wanted, caused, or started the
World War. It is more or less true that the "nominal rulers," the
"terror-stricken dummies," the emasculated diplomatists and statesmen,
were unable to prevent the War's outbreak. And yet we do know that the
military organizations of all the warring countries were plenty active
in preparing for the War, no matter what the emperors, kings, kaisers,
diplomatists, or statesmen said, thought, or intended. But these
military organizations were merely instrumentalities -- effective
tools in the hands of some heretofore unmentioned and unseen power. We
now summon to our aid the history of Europe. What the statesmen
refused to disclose, history commences to reveal.
And the first revelation we come upon, and are obliged to consider,
has to do with Money!
Wars can't be fought without spondulics. Someone must put up the cash,
or be willing to put up the cash, or the kings, diplomatists and
statesmen must know where the cash is, whether it comes forth
willingly or has to be conscripted. If the bankers of a nation -- any
nation! -- don't want an offensive war, or if they're convinced that
war means loss to their coffers, make no mistake about it, they're in
a position to stop it before it's even talked about. If you think I'm
talking through my hat in this, or want to advance the argument that
"it doesn't cost anything to kill a man," I respectfully refer you to
any good history of the House of Rothschild.
I haven't seen any history of the House of Rothschild yet that hasn't
contained gloating statements concerning the numbers of times since
the beginning of the 19th century that rulers have approached the
House of Rothschild for cash for wars. If the Rothschilds decided that
the wars looked profitable to themselves, they arranged for the
payments and the wars came pronto! If the Rothschilds decided there
wouldn't be a whole lot gained, financially, or the risks were too
great, or they didn't happen to have the mazuma on the nail at the
moment, the rulers went away with a polite turn-down. And there was no
conflict!
From the very beginning of the history of the House of Rothschild --
founded on the cash which George III paid the German Landgrave for the
"loan" of the Hessian soldiers that composed the bulk of the "British"
forces in our American Revolution -- that particular Yiddisher
financial family has been bankers to the political and military
potentates of Europe. At least Central Europe!
The Rothschilds, of course, are mainly German Jews. Such German Jews,
together with Polish Jews and Russian Jews, we call Ashkenazim.
Ashkenazic Jews, in other words, are the Jews of Germany, Poland, and
Russia -- with a strong strain of Oriental blood from the Genghis Kahn
infusion. When they combine their Hebrew with the German, Polish, or
Russian tongues, they get a polyglot language that is popularly called
"Yiddish." So it's entirely proper to refer to these oriental Jews as
"Yiddishers."...
But we shouldn't gallop away with the idea that the Yiddisher
Rothschilds compose the only mob of Jews overseas that's got money --
big money! There are two or three other Jewish fortunes overseas, of
which you don't hear so much.
There's the money of the Samuel family that controls the Dutch Shell
Oil Company -- in fact, most of the British oil interests in the
Levant. There is the money of the Sassoon clan that controls the vast
Indian and Chinese dope trade. There is the Mond fortune, the Isaacs
fortune, Lord Reading's -- and finally the Montagu fortune, Montagu
Norman being head of the Bank of England itself.
I heard a British intelligence officer remark once in a casual
conversation that the fortune of the Samuel family -- headed up by the
"Right Honorable" Herbert Samuel, made a Viscount, if you please, last
year! -- was greater than Morgan's, greater than Rockefeller's,
greater than Ford's.
These five great families of so-called English Jews -- English only
because they have resided in Great Britain for generations and
intermarried with impoverished English aristocrats -- aren't
Ashkenazim. In other words, they haven't got the Oriental, Russian,
German, or Polish strain in 'em.
No! All these families, whose vast wealth absolutely dominates the
Bank of England, are more accurately classed as Sephardim. They're
so-called white Jews -- or Jews who a couple of hundred years ago
started to interbreed with the more Aryan races of Spain, Italy,
Portugal, and France. Finally when they got across to England, they
became English jews -- as we know 'em. Their Spanish, Italian,
Portuguese, French and English bloods predominate over their Jewish
blood. This gives them the notion that they are very high-class
indeed. The big hooked nose which the Ashkenazic Jew acquired from the
Assyrian -- "schnozzle" if you please! -- is missing in the Sephardic
Jew. Physically, excepting a certain rubbery cunning about the
expression of the eyes, he's come to appear like a Spaniard, an
Italian, a Portuguese, a Frenchman, or an Englishman.
Such persons as Disraeli in yesterday's generation, or Barney Baruch,
George Arliss, Sam Insull, or even Franklin D. Roosevelt -- whose true
ancestral name has come to light under the investigations of the
Carnegie Foundation as Rossocampo-Rosenvelt -- are outstanding
specimens of the Sephardic Jew.
There is furthermore this difference between the Ashkenazic Jew and
the Sephardic Jew:
The Ashkenazic Jew holds in the main that world Jewry is a race -- a
political race, so to speak. The Sephardic Jew holds in the main that
world Jewry is a religious denomination.
Both of these claims are capital expediencies when Jews as Jews are
having the squeeze put on them for predatory tactics against Gentiles
--
The Ashkenazim shriek "Racial persecution!" The Sephardim screech
"Religious intolerance!" Both of these about cover the situation....
Now, broadly speaking, here's the way we can boil down the
money-banker situation as it existed on the Continent prior to 1914:
The Ashkenazic Rothschilds had the big bank roll behind Germany and
the Central Powers; the Sephardic Samuels had the big bank roll behind
France, England and the Allies. A perfectly gorgeous set-up it was,
for a knock-down drag-out fight, when we take into consideration one
of the outstanding differences of temperament existing between these
two Jewish factions --
Believe it or not, but up to the time when all world Jewry was
threatened because of the Nazi ascendancy in Central Europe, the
Sephardic Jews looked upon the Ashkenazic Jews with an intolerance and
detestation only comparable to the Nazi attitude toward Jews in the
Fatherland!
The Sephardic Jews, as I said, considered themselves the aristocrats
of World Jewry -- because of their heavy infusion of Aryan blood and
their more aesthetic temperament. To them, the Yiddishers were "just
human trash" and we don't have to probe far into the annals of Jewry
to recognize what a tragedy it was considered, when a Sephardic Jewess
fell in love with, and married, an Ashkenazic boy.
Do you know where the slang term "Kike" came from? I'll tell you, and
you can take my word for it that I'm speaking without bias. The slang
term "Kike" is a Sephardic-Jewish epithet originated by that caste of
Jewry to describe the schnozzle-faced quasi-oriental Ashkenazim whom
it detests!
Although few Gentiles have had cause to be aware of it, the feud
between the Sephardim and Ashkenazim, over the past two hundred years,
has been strong and bitter.
Of course there was inter-marrying, and inter-financing between the
two groups. But in the main the animosity was something that had to be
reckoned with, in Mitteleuropa's politics.
With this racial background roughly painted in, now we can go one step
further and see how these two groups of Jewry influenced overseas
affairs before 1914....
Chapter IV
Back in 1815, at the close of the Napoleonic Wars and before the House
of Rothschild was as powerful as it later became, the Congress of
Vienna divided up Europe and bartered millions of human beings to the
victorious military commanders who had put the squelch on the Little
Corporal. Naturally a storm of bitter protest was heard in every
corner of the Continent. It took fifty years for the peoples of Europe
-- after much privation, starvation, and bloodshed -- to correct the
evils committed by the Congress of Vienna. Germany was consolidated
and Italy was unified. The industries of Germany started to boom. So
too did the size of the Rothschild fortune. The greater bulk of it was
invested in industrial securities in Germany and Austria-Hungary, or
in ownership of coal and iron mines and transportation facilities.
In consequence of all this, the territory of Germany began to show
itself as too small to absorb her industrial products. An outside
market had to be secured -- in fact, if her industries were to sell
goods and pay proper dividends, the markets of all the world had to be
opened to "Germans" ... a camouflage word for the sponsoring
Rothschilds!
On the other hand, over in Holland and England, the white Sephardic
Jews had their money invested heavily in British and Dutch securities.
Moreover, their trade was already world-wide and the British into
whose official government they were infiltrating -- quite as brazenly
as they have lately infiltrated into the American government under
Roosevelt -- had a tradition of "ruling the waves."
Thus a trade war was inaugurated, bloodless at first, between the
great vested interests of Ashkenazic-Jewish Germany and the great
vested interests of Sephardic-ruled Britain. The two mighty divisions
of World Jewry were slashing and hacking at each other but letting the
"German" and "English" people each think that the other as nationals
were out to "do" them.
Now get this, little male children of the American Legion, and let it
sink in, for this is the reason that you went overseas to fight in a
war -- Ashkenazic-Germany's only entrance into the Atlantic Ocean was
through the English Channel. Passage of German ships through the
Channel was possible only by the consent of Sephardic-Jewish England.
This being clear enough, England and Germany (Gentile) began to build
battleships to unheard-of proportions. But it was soon discovered that
battleships wouldn't secure to Ashkenazic-Jewish Germany the freedom
of the seas which the Rothschild interests wanted, or the free and
unmolested movement of international trade. Therefore, the Ashkenazic
Jews of Rothschild-dominated Germany conceived the idea of building a
railroad.
It was to become called in time the Berlin-Bagdad Railroad! It was to
lead from Berlin down into Austria-Hungary, through the Balkans and
into Turkey -- ending in Bagdad, in Asia.
Over this railroad, Ashkenazic-Jewish Germany could reach the larger
portion of the world's population and transact most of the
international commerce of the world without interference from the
Sephardic Jews of Britain.
That is to say, whoever would have control of the Berlin-Bagdad
Railroad would have control of the greatest bulk of the international
commerce of the world. But the control and successful operation of the
Berlin-Bagdad Railroad necessitated the control of the territories
through which it passed.
Therefore the plan of "Mitteleuropa" was conceived!
Germany, Austria-Hungary, the Balkans, and Turkey, were to be
controlled by the owners of the Berlin-Bagdad Railroad -- that is, the
Ashkenazic Rothschilds.
The "Pan-German Movement," the shibboleth of "Deutschland Uber Alles,"
and all those other idiotic utterances which the Jews love so dearly
to put into the mouths of Gentiles, were slogans for this plan. The
"integrity" of the Austria-Hungarian monarchy was indispensable,
therefore Hungary was forced under the despotic control of the
Austrian Crown.
While the plan of the Berlin-Bagdad Railroad was being promoted,
however, another movement got under way. It came from Russia. On paper
it was called the "Pan Slavic Movement."
Russia, a big and rich country, had no ice-free outlet to the high
seas. The Baltic is frozen during the greater part of the year. The
Black Sea is an inland waterway and its only outlet to the
Mediterranean Sea is at Constantinople. To secure this outlet, Russia
would have to control the Dardanelles and a part of the Balkans.
In 1877, Russia had made an effort to obtain control of this outlet,
and declared war upon Turkey under the still popular pretext that "the
Turks had mistreated the Christians" in the Balkans. Turkey was
thrashed, the "Christians" were forgotten, but Constantinople was
seized by Russia.
Now mark this --
A growing feud was arising between the Jews of the world, particularly
the Ashkenazic Jews, and the Throne of the Romanoffs. Russia as an
empire was so vast, her resources so tremendous, and her government so
absolute, that the Jews couldn't get their talons into her flesh as
they had into Germany's or England's. The Czar's government rarely had
to borrow money from Continental Jewish pawnbrokers -- whom Father
Coughlin designates so courteously as "the international bankers" --
or if it did, it never met with much embarrassment paying such loans
back. Furthermore, because the Czar's military commanders found that
wherever Jews were domiciled near army cantonments they invariably
sold military secrets to Russia's enemies, and still further, because
Jewish loan sharks were foreclosing mortgages on vast areas of the
land of ignorant peasants, the Czar's government had issued some
particularly strong edicts against the Jews, which made that race view
the Romanoffs with deadly hatred.
They were out to "get" the Romanoffs, and in the end they succeeded --
the Lenin-Stalin government of Bolshevia being the achievement. We'll
come to that later.
The Romanoffs were by no means fools, and they kept accurate track of
what these international mischief-makers proposed to do in the matter
of splitting Europe from Berlin to Bagdad with a railroad. The Czar's
government saw immediately that if the Rothschilds got their railroad
down to Bagdad, they would have the first clutch at Russia by shutting
off her world commerce and commence to make her pay through the nose.
To go back to 1877, however, when Russia thrashed Turkey and got
control of the Dardanelles, the Ashkeniazic Jews of the central
European countries were furious. So for once they made common cause
with the Sephardim of England -- the Sephardic Jew, Disraeli, being
English Prime Minister at the time -- and presented to the British
Gentiles that Russia in control of the Dardanelles was a menace to
Britannia's ruling the waves. Therefore it wasn't difficult to get the
British to step into the Turkish situation and force the Czar to
relinquish.
Take note that even back there in those days, the common soldiers --
fellows like ourselves -- who had fought and bled and died that Russia
might shellac Turkey, made their "sacrifices" all in vain when the
Jews of the world had a plan to work out to promote their own
interests.
England blocked the scheme of Russia to get an ice-free outlet to the
high seas, and this act caused Russia to become the sworn enemy of
what appeared -- on the surface to be Germany, Austria, and England.
Truly it caused Russia, or the monarchy of the Romanoffs, to become
the sworn enemies of the Jews who controlled Germany, Austria, and
England -- Ashkenazim and Sephardim alike.
Right there, in that situation, lay the "makin's" of the war that all
the weak-kneed diplomatists and statesmen of the world have been
charging up to the militarists and German monarchists. Right there, in
that situation, lay the "makin's" of the conflict that you and I -- in
utter ignorance of all this internal Jewish skulduggery -- were
persuaded to go overseas and fight under the slogan that we were going
"to make the world safe for Democracy."
Sheep-dip!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
warre...@yahoo.com (Wild Colonial Boy) wrote in message news:<3c11d51f...@news.eircom.net>...
Answers
to come up with all this garbage, or 50 morons?
You guys desperately need some sex. The sperm buildup is so bad that
you are having delusions. Again.
Jack Sais
(in message <3C125B79...@ucla.edu>):
> This is slapstick funny. I just want to know whether it takes one moron
> to come up with all this garbage, or 50 morons?
>
> You guys desperately need some sex. The sperm buildup is so bad that
> you are having delusions. Again.
>
Presumably because no remotely self-respecting female will allow this filth
to reproduce itself...
Thankfully.
==============================================================
Posted with Hogwasher. Mac first, Mac only:
http://www.asar.com/cgi-bin/product.pl?58/hogwasher.html
==============================================================
Marcus Clarke
of typewriters, one of them will eventually come up with the complete works
of Shakespeare. The rest will produce your kind of shit.
You do realise that *if* there'is a hell, you're going there? Don't you?
- Marcus.
Gareth Williams
> Now don't get me wrong! I'm no Nazi propagandist apologizing for Hitler.
> I don't believe his brand of government would work for Americans
Of Hitler's many claims to infamy, to single out his "brand of
government" as a flaw is almost laughably myopic.
> What I have behind my eyebrows to do first ...
Has this person _anything_ behind his eyebrows except thick bone?
> Of all the statesmen of the warring countries, Lloyd George of England
Can't be relied upon as much of an authority on history if he thinks
Lloyd George was "of England"!!!
> Specifically in the World War -- or before it -- was it the colonels,
> the majors, the captains, the first and second lieutenants, or the
> top-sergeants, who wanted the war? If so, may we ask since when did
> emperors, diplomatists, prime ministers and generals harken to the
> gripes of colonels, majors, captains and top-sergeants, that a war
> should be started so that they could bang-off their fire-sticks?
> Applesauce!
Mint sauce, actually. This statement shows a staggering naivete with
regard to the English class system. Old-school allegiances and rivalries
formed a semi-permeable membrane between state and military at the time.
Has this man never read Sassoon or Kipling et al?
> Someone, somewhere, was responsible for creating those great military
> machines because someone, somewhere, expected to use 'em!
So who created the "great military machine" of the Wehrmacht, then?
The Seventh-day Adventists? The Mormons? The Dalai Lama?
> The big hooked nose which the Ashkenazic Jew acquired from the Assyrian
> is missing in the Sephardic Jew.
You mean there's a gaping hole in the middle of the face? Yuk!
> Physically, excepting a
> certain rubbery cunning about the expression of the eyes, he's come to
> appear like a Spaniard, an Italian, a Portuguese, a Frenchman, or an
> Englishman.
The complete bastards! Fancy having a physiognomy that matches the
country in which generations of your family have lived for centuries -
the sheer bloody effrontery of it! What _is_ the world coming to?
[The rest, whilst almost as entertaining a read as Mein Kampf and runs it
a close second for the "Apotheosis of Paranoia" Award, is snipped.]
Why not treat yourself and visit David Icke's site about lizards taking
over the world? It's about on a par with this conspiratorist drivel.
Huw Waters
lord [Jesus Christ]) - 2000 AD that includes a lot about the Jewish.
Europe's majority are part of Christianity since Roman invasion. And
still is. Jews have fled from troubles, and are trying to make the best
of their live with intelligence. Seems to me that these points are
coming from a gealous prick who lacks such intelligence and is a racist.
Huw - Wales
wally
June 1999, Issue 54 under the title 'Cherchez le Juif' (Images
Supplied).
The Jewish Involvement in Destroying
White Racial Solidarity
Kevin MacDonald, The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of
Jewish Involvement
in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements, Prager,
1998, $65.00, 379 pp.
Reviewed by Stanley Hornbeck
In The Culture of Critique, Kevin MacDonald advances a carefully
researched but extremely controversial thesis: that certain 20th
century intellectual movements - largely established and led by Jews -
have changed European societies in fundamental ways and destroyed the
confidence of Western man. He claims that these movements were
designed, consciously or unconsciously, to advance Jewish interests
even though they were presented to non-Jews as universalistic and even
utopian. He concludes that the increasing dominance of these ideas has
had profound political and social consequences that benefited Jews but
caused great harm to gentile societies. This analysis, which he makes
with considerable force, is an unusual indictment of a people
generally thought to be more sinned against than sinning.
The Culture of Critique is the final title in Prof. MacDonald's
massive, three-volume study of Jews and their role in history. The two
previous volumes are A People That Shall Dwell Alone and Separation
and its Discontents, published by Praeger in 1994 and 1998. The series
is written from a sociobiological perspective that views Judaism as a
unique survival strategy that helps Jews compete with other ethnic
groups. Prof. MacDonald, who is a psychologist at the University of
California at Long Beach, explains this perspective in the first
volume, which describes Jews as having a very powerful sense of
uniqueness that has kept them socially and genetically separate from
other peoples. The second volume traces the history of Jewish-gentile
relations, and finds the causes of anti-Semitism primarily in the
almost invariable commercial and intellectual dominance of gentile
societies by Jews and in their refusal to assimilate. The Culture of
Critique brings his analysis into the present century, with an account
of the Jewish role in the radical critique of traditional culture.
The intellectual movements Prof. MacDonald discusses in this volume
are Marxism, Freudian psychoanalysis, the Frankfurt school of
sociology, and Boasian anthropology. Perhaps most relevant from a
racial perspective, he also traces the role of Jews in promoting
multi-culturalism and Third World immigration. Throughout his analysis
Prof. MacDonald reiterates his view that Jews have promoted these
movements as Jews and in the interests of Jews, though they have often
tried to give the impression that they had no distinctive interests of
their own. Therefore Prof. MacDonald's most profound charge against
Jews is not ethnocentrism but dishonesty - that while claiming to be
working for the good of mankind they have often worked for their own
good and to the detriment of others. While attempting to promote the
brotherhood of man by dissolving the ethnic identification of
gentiles, Jews have maintained precisely the kind of intense group
solidarity they decry as immoral in others.
Celebrating Diversity
Prof. MacDonald claims that one of the most consistent ways in which
Jews have advanced their interests has been to promote pluralism and
diversity - but only for others. Ever since the 19th century, they
have led movements that tried to discredit the traditional foundations
of gentile society: patriotism, racial loyalty, the Christian basis
for morality, social homogeniety, and sexual restraint. At the same
time, within their own communities,and with regard to the state of
Israel, they have often supported the very institutions they attack in
gentile society.
Why is this in the interests of Jews? Because the parochial group
loyalty characteristic of Jews attracts far less attention in a
society that does not have a cohesive racial and cultural core. The
Jewish determination not to assimilate fully, which accounts for their
survival as a people for thousands for years - even without a country
- has invariably attracted unpleasant and even murderous scrutiny in
nations with well -defined national identities. In Prof. MacDonald's
view it is therefore in the interest of Jews to dilute and weaken the
identity of any people among whom they live. Jewish identity can
flower in safety only when gentile identity is weak.
Prof. MacDonald quotes a remarkable passage from Charles Silberman:
"American Jews are committed to cultural tolerance because of their
belief - one firmly rooted in history - that Jews are safe only in a
society acceptant of a wide range of attitudes and behaviors, as well
as a diversity of religious and ethnic groups. It is this belief, for
example, not approval of homosexuality, that leads an overwhelming
majority of American Jews to endorse 'gay rights' and to take a
liberal stance on most other so-called 'social' issues."
He is saying, in effect, that when Jews make the
diversity-is-our-strength argument it is in support of their real goal
of diluting a society's homogeneity so that Jews will feel safe. They
are couching a Jewish agenda in terms they think gentiles will accept.
Likewise, as the second part of the Silberman quotation suggests, Jews
may support deviant movements, not because they think it is good for
the country but because it is good for the Jews.
Prof. Silberman also provides an illuminating quote froma Jewish
economist who thought that republicans had more sensible economic
policies but who voted for the Democratic presidential candidate
anyway. His reason? "I'd rather live in a country governed by the
faces I saw at the Democratic conventin than those I saw at the
Republican convention." This man apparently distrusts white gentiles
and voted for a racially mixed party even if its economic policies
were wrong. What is good for Jews appears to come before what is good
for the country.
Earl Raab, former president of heavily Jewish Brandeis University
makes the diversity argument in a slightly different way. Expressing
his satisfaction with the prediction that by the middle of the next
century whites will become a minority, he writes, "We have tipped
beyond the point where a Nazi-Aryan party will be able to prevail in
this country." He is apparently prepared to displace the people and
culture of the founding stock in order to prevent the theoretical rise
of an anti-Jewish regime. Prof. Raab appears to see whites mainly as
potential Nazis, and is willing to sacrifice their culture and
national continuity in order to defuse an imagined threat to Jews.
This passage takes for granted the continued future existence of Jews
as a distinct community even as gentile whites decline in numbers and
influence.
In the same passage, Prof. Raab continues by noting that, "[w]e [Jews]
have been nourishing the American climate of opposition to bigotry for
about half a century. That climate has not yet been perfected, but the
hterogeneous nature of our population tends to make it
irreversible..." - just as it tends to make the ultimate displacement
of European culture also irreversible.
Prof. MacDonald traces the developement of this diversity strategy to
several sources. It is widely recognized that the German-Jewish
immigrant Franz Boas (1858-1942) almost single-handedly established
the current contours of anthropology, ridding it of all biological
explanations for differences in human culture or behavior. Prof.
MacDonald reports that he and his followers - with the notable
exceptions of Margaret Meade and Ruth Benedict - were all Jews with
strong Jewish identities: "Jewish identification and the persuit of
perceived Jewish interests, particularly in advocating an ideology of
cultural pluralism as a model for Western societies, has been the
'invisible subject' of American anthropology."
By 1915, Boas and his students controlled the American Anthropological
Association and by 1926 they headed every major American university
anthropology department. From this position of dominance they promoted
the idea that race and biology are trivial matters, and that
environment counts for everything. They completely recast anthropology
so as to provide intellectual support for open immigration,
integration, and miscegenation. They also laid the foundation for the
idea that because all races have the same potential, the failures of
non-whites must be blamed exclusively on white oppression. The
ultimate conclusion of Boasian anthropology was that since environment
accounts for all human differences, every inequality in acheivement
can be eliminated by changing the environment. This has been the
justification for enormous and wasteful government intervention
programs.
The entire "civil rights" movement can be seen as a natural
consequence of the triumph of Boasian thinking. Since all races were
equivalent, separation was immoral. The color line also sharpened
white self-consciousness in ways that might make whites more aware of
Jewish parochialism. Thus it was, according to Prof. MacDonald, that
Jews almost single-handedly launched the desegregation movement.
Without the leadership of Jews, the NAACP might never have been
established, and until 1975 every one of its presidents was a Jew.
Prof. MacDonald reports that in 1917, when the black separatist Marcus
Garvey visited NAACP headquarters, he saw so many white faces that he
stormed out, complaining that it was a white organization.
Prof. MacDonald concludes that the efforts of Jews were crucial to the
"civil rights" transformation of America. He quotes a lawyer for the
American Jewish Congress who claims that "many of these [civil rights]
laws were actually written in the offices of Jewish agencies by Jewish
staff people, introduced by Jewish legislators and pressured into
being by Jewish voters."
While the Boas school was promoting integration and racial
equivalence, it was also critical of, in Prof. MacDonald's words,
"American culture as overly homogeneous, hypocritical, emotionally and
esthetically repressive (especially with regard to sexuality). Central
to this program was creating ethnographies od idyllic [Third-World]
cultures that were free of the negatively perceived traits that were
attributed to Western culture."
The Role of the anthropologist became one of criticizing everything
about Western society while glorifying everything primitive. Prof.
MacDonald notes that Boasian portrayals of non-Western peoples
deliberately ignored barbarism and cruelty or simply attributed it to
contamination from the West. He sees this as a deliberate attempt to
undermine the confidence of Western societies and to make them
permeable to Third World influences and people. Today, this view is
enshrined in the dogma that America must remain open to immigration
because immigrants bring spirit and energy that natives somehow lack.
Authoritarian Personalities
In order to open European-derived societies to the immigration that
would transform them, it was necessary to discredit racial solidarity
and commitment to tradition. Prof. MacDonald argues that this was the
basic purpose of a group of intellectuals known as the Frankfurt
School. What is properly known as the Institute of Social Research was
founded in Frankfurt, Germany, during the Weimar period by a Jewish
millionaire but was closed down by the Nazis shortly after they took
power. Most of its staff emigrated to the United States and the
institute reconstituted itself at UC Berkeley. The organization was
headed by Max Horkheimer, and its most influential members were T.W.
Adorno, Erich Fromm, and Herbert Marcuse, all of whom had strong
Jewish identities. Horkheimer made no secret of the partisan nature of
the institute's activities: "Research would be able here to transform
itself directly into propaganda," he wrote. (Italics in the original)
Prof. MacDonald devotes many pages to an analysis of The Authoritarian
Personality, which was written by Adorno and appeared in 1950. It was
part of a series called Studies in Prejudice, produced by the
Frankfurt school, which included titles like Anti-Semitism and
Emotional Disorder. The Authoritarian Personality, which was
particularly influential because, according to Prof. MacDonald, the
American Jewish Committee heavily funded its promotion and because
Jewish academics took up its message so enthusiastically.
The book's purpose is to make every group affiliation sound as if it
were a sign of mental disorder. Everything from patriotism to religion
to family - and race - loyalty are sign of a dangerous and defective
"authoritarian personality." Because drawning distinctions between
different groups is illegitimate, all group loyalties - even close
family ties! - are "prejudice." As Christopher Lasch has written, the
book leads to the conclusion that prejudice "could be eradicated only
by subjecting the American people to what amounted to collective
psychotherapy - by treating them as inmates of an insane asylum."
But according to Prof. MacDonald it is precisely the kind of group
loyalty, respect for tradition, and consciousness of differences
central to Jewish identity that Horkheimer and Adorno described as
mental illness in gentiles. These writers adopted what eventually
became a favorite Soviet tactic against dissidents: Anyone whose
political views were different from theirs was insane. As Prof.
MacDonald explains, the Frankfurt school never criticized or even
described Jewish group identity - only that of gentiles: "behavior
that is critical to Judaism as a successful group evolutionary
strategy is conceptualized as pathological in gentiles."
For these Jewish intellectuals, anti-Semitism was also a sign of
mental illness: They concluded that Christian self-denial and
especially sexual repression caused hatred of Jews. The Frankfurt
school was enthusiastic about psycho-analysis, according to which
"Oedipal ambivalence toward the father and anal-sadistic relations in
early childhood are the anti-Semite's irrevocable inheritance."
In addition to ridiculing patriotism and racial identity, the
Frankfurt school glorified promiscuity and Bohemian poverty. Prof.
MacDonald sees the school as a seminal influence: "Certainly many of
the central attitudes of the largely successful 1960s countercultural
revolution find expression in The Authoritarian Personality, including
idealizing rebellion against parents, low-investment sexual
relationships, and scorn for upward social mobility, social status,
family pride, the Christian religion, and patriotism."
Of the interest here, however, is the movement's success in branding
ancient loyalties to nation and race as mental illnesses. Although he
came later, the French-Jewish "deconstructionist" Jacques Derrida was
in the same tradition when he wrote:
"The idea behind deconstruction is to deconstruct the workings of
strong nation-states with powerful immigration policies, to
deconstruct the rhetoric of nationalism, the politics of place, the
metaphysics of native land and native tongue... The idea is to disarm
the bombs... of identitiy that nation-states build to defend
themselves against the stranger, against Jews and Arabs and
immigrants... "
As Prof. MacDonald puts it, "Viewed at its most abstract level, a
fundamental agenda is thus to influence the European-derived peoples
of the United States to view concern about their own demographic and
cultural eclipse as irrational and as an indication of
psychopathology." Needless to say, this project has been successful;
anyone opposed to the diplacement of whites is routinely treated as a
mentally unhinged "hate-monger," and whenever whites defend their
group interests they are described as psychologically inadequate. The
irony has not escaped Prof. MacDonald: "The ideology that
ethnocentrism was a form of psychopathology was promulgated by a group
that over its long history had arguably been the most ethnocentric
group among all the cultures of the world."
Immigration
Prof. MacDonald argues that it is entirely natural for Jews to promote
open immigration. It brings about the "diversity" Jews find comforting
and it keeps America open to persecuted co-religionists throughout the
world. He says Jews are the only group that has always fought for mass
immigration; a few European ethnic organizations have made sporadic
efforts to make it easier for their own people to come, but only Jews
have consistently promoted open borders for all comers. Moreover,
whatever disagreements they may have had on other issues, Jews of
every political persuasion have favored high immigration.
This, too, goes back many years, and Prof. MacDonald traces in
considerable detail the sustained Jewish pro-immigration effort.
Israel Zangwill, author of the eponymous 1908 play The Melting Pot,
was of the view that "there is only one way to World Peace, and that
is the absolute abolition of passports, visas, frontiers, custom
houses... " He was nevertheless an ardent Zionist and disapproved of
Jewish intermarriage.
Although the statue of liberty, properly known as Liberty Enlightening
the World, was a gift to the United States from France as a tribute to
American political traditions, the sonnet by the Jewish Emma Lazarus
helped change it into a symbol of immigration. Affixed to the base of
the statue several decades after its contruction, the poem welcomes to
America "huddled masses yearning to breath free/The wretched refuse of
your teeming shore."
Prof. MacDonald has discovered that implausible arguments about
diversity being a quintessentially American strength have been made by
Jews for a long time. He reports that in 1948 the American Jewish
Committee was urging Congress to believe that "Americanism is the
spirit behind the welcome that America has traditionally extended to
people of all races, all religions, all nationalities." Of course,
there had never been such a tradition. In 1952, the American Jewish
Congress argued in hearings on immigration that "our national
experience has confirmed beyond a doubt that our very strength lies in
the diversity of our peoples." This, too, was at a time when U.S.
immigration law was still explicitly designed to maintain a white
majority.
It is often said that when the old immigration policy was scrapped in
1965, scarely anyone knew, and no one predicted, that the new law
would change the racial makeup of the country. Prof. MacDonald
disputes this, arguing that this had been the objective of Jewish
groups from the beginning.
Prof. MacDonald finds that Jews have been the foremost advocates of
immigration in England, France, and Canada, and that Jewish groups
were the most vocal opponents of independence for Quebec. Australian
Jews led the effort to dismantle the "white Australia" policy, one
reason for which was cited in an editorial in the Australian Jewish
Democrat: "The strengthening of multicultural or diverse Australia is
also our most effective insurance policy against anti-Semitism. The
day Australia has a Chinese Australian Governer General I would feel
more confident of my freedom to live as a Jewish Australian." Like
Earl Raab writing about the United States, this Australian Jew is
prepared to sacrifice the traditional culture, people, and identity of
Australia to specifically Jewish interests. It would not be surprising
if such an openly expressed objective did not have the opposite effect
from the intended, and increase anti-Jewish sentiment.
Jews and the Left
It is well known that Jews have been traditionally associated with the
left, and Prof. MacDonald investigates this connection in some detail.
Historically it was understandable that Jews should support movements
that advocated overthrowing the existing order. After emancipation,
Jews met resistance from gentile elites who did not want to lose
ground to competitors, and outsiders easily become revolutionaries.
However, in Prof. MacDonald's view, Jewish commitment to leftist
causes has often been motivated by the hope that communism,
especially, would be a tool for combating anti-Semitism, and by
expectation that universalist social solutions would be yet another
way to dissolve gentile loyalties that might exclude Jews. The appeal
of univeralist ideologies is tied to the implicit understanding that
Jewish particularism will be exempt: "At the extreme, acceptance of a
universalist ideology by gentiles would result in gentiles not
perceiving Jews as in a different social category at all, while
nonetheless Jews would be able to maintain a strong personal identity
as Jews."
Prof. MacDonald argues that Jews had specifically Jewish reasons for
supporting the Bolshevik revolution. Czarist Russia was notorious for
its anti-Semitic policies and, during its early years, the Soviet
Union seemed to be the promised land for Jews: it ended state
anti-Semitism, tried to eradicate Christianity, opened opportunities
to individual Jews, and preached a "classless" society in which
Jewishness would presumably attract no negative attention. Moreover,
since Marxism taught that all conflict was economic rather than
ethnic, many Jews believed it heralded the end of anti-Semitism.
Prof. MacDonald emphasizes that although Jewish Communists preached
both atheism and the solidarity of the world's working people, they
took pains to preserve a distinct, secular Jewish identity. He reports
that Lenin himself (who had one Jewish grandparent) approved the
continuation of an explicitly Jewish identity under Communism, and in
1946 the Communist Party of the United States voted a resolution also
supporting Jewish peoplehood in Communist countries. Thus, although
Communism was supposed to be without borders or religion, Jews were
confident that it would make a place for their own group identity. He
writes that despite the official view that all men were to be
brothers, "very few Jews lost their Jewish identity during the entire
soviet era."
Jewish Communists sometimes betrayed remarkable particularism. Prof.
MacDonald quotes Charles Pappoport, the French Communist leader: "The
Jewish people [are] the bearer of all the great ideas of unity and
human community in history... The disappearance of the Jewish people
would signify the death of humankind, the final transformation of man
into a wild beast." This seems to attribute to Jews an elite position
incompatible with "unity and human community."
Prof. MacDonald argues that many Jews began to fall away from
Communism only after Stalin showed himself to be anti-Semitic. And
just as Jews had been the leading revolutionaries in anti-Semitic
pre-Revolutionary Russia, Jews became the leading dissidents in an
anti-Semitic Soviet Union. A similar pattern can be found in the
imposed Communist governments of Eastern Europe, which were largely
dominated by Jews. The majority of the leaders of the Polish Communist
Party, for example, spoke better Yiddish than Polish, and they too
maintained a strong Jewish identity. After the fall of Communism many
stopped being Polish and emigrated to Israel.
Prof. MacDonald writes that in Bela Kun's short-lived 1919 Communist
government of Hungary, 95 percent of the leaders were Jews, and that
at the time of the 1956 uprising Communism was so closely associated
with Jews that the rioting had almost the flavor of a pogrom. He
argues that in the United States as well, the hard core among
Communists and members of Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) was
mainly Jewish. Here, too, a revolutionary, atheist, and universalist
world-view was fully compatible with strong identification as jews.
Prof. MacDonald quotes from a study of American leftists:
"Many Communists, for example, state that they could never have
married a spouse who was not a leftist. When Jews were asked if they
could have married Gentiles, many hesitated, surprised by the
question, and found it difficult to answer. Upon reflection, many
concluded that they had always taken marriage to someone Jewish for
granted." Their commitment as Jews was even more fundamental and
unexamined than their commitment to the left.
Prof. MacDonald reports that many American Jews also abandoned
Communism as it became increasingly anti-Semitic. For a large number,
the Soviet Union's severing of diplomatic ties with Israel during the
1967 war was the last straw. A former SDS activist no doubt spoke for
many when he explained, "If I must choose between the Jewish cause and
a 'progressive' anti-Israel SDS, I shall choose the Jewish cause. If
barricades are erected, I will fight as a Jew." According to Prof.
MacDonald, American neoconservatism can also be described as a surface
shift in external politics that leaves the more fundamental commitment
to Jewish identity unchanged. Thus, former leftists abandoned an
ideology that had turned against Israel and refashioned American
conservatism into a different movement, the one unshakable theme of
which was support for Israel. Neoconservatives also support high
levels of immigration and were active in excluding white racial
identification from the "respectable" right.
Objections
There are many possible objections to Prof. MacDonald's thesis. The
first is that it is largely built on the assumption that Jews are
dishonest. It is always risky to assume one understands the motives of
others better than they do themselves. Jews have traditionally thought
of themselves as a benevolent presence, even as a "light unto the
nations" or a "chosen people." This is echoed today in the Jewish self
image as champions of the excluded and the oppressed. Most of the time
what passes for "social justice" has the effect of undermining the
traditions and loyalties of gentile society, but are Jews deliberately
undermining these things rather than righting what they perceive to be
wrongs?
Prof. MacDonald concedes that many Jews are sincere in their support
for liberal causes, but then escalates his indictment by arguing that
"the best deceivers are those who deceive themselves." In other words,
many Jews who are actually working for Jewish interests have first
convinced themselves otherwise. A Jew who mainly wants America to
become less white may also have convinced himself that America
benefits from a multitude of cultures. Having convinced himself he can
more effectively convince others.
Many jews, Prof. MacDonald argues, are not even conscious of the
extent to which their Jewishness is central to their identities or
their political views. He quotes Rabbi Abrham Joshua Heschel on his
surprise at how passionately he embraced the Israeli side during the
1967 war: "I had not known how Jewish I was." This is an arresting
statement from a man who was thought to be perhaps the greatest Jewish
spititual leader of his time. And whether or not it affects their
politics, Jews certainly appear to have a very vivid sense of
peoplehood. Prof. MacDonald quotes theologian Eugene Borowitz as
saying,"most Jews claim to be equipped with an interpersonal
friend-or-foe sensing device that enables them to detect the presence
of another Jew, despite heavy camouflage." Always to think in terms of
"friends or foe" is no insignificant matter.
Prof. MacDonald is therefore skeptical of Jewish disavowals: "Surface
declarations of a lack of Jewish identity may be highly misleading."
He notes that Jewish publications write about the power and influence
of American Jews in language Jews would immediately denounce as
"anti-Semitic" if used by gentiles. He agrees with Joseph Sobran, who
has said "they want to be Jews among themselves but resent being seen
as Jews by Gentiles. They want to pursue their own distinct interests
while pretending that they have no such interests... "
Prof. MacDonald argues that the success of Jewish-led intellectual
movements has been possible only because their Jewish character was
hidden. If mulitculturalism or mass immigration or The Authoritarian
Personality had been promoted by Orthodox Jews in black coats the
Jewish element would have been clear. Prof. MacDonald writes that in
fact, "the Jewish political agenda was not an aspect of the theory and
the theories themselves had no overt Jewish content. Gentile
intellectuals approaching these theories were therefore unlikely to
view them as aspects of Jewish-gentile cultural competition or as an
aspect of a specifically Jewish political agenda." Prof. MacDonald
also claims that Jews have often tried to conceal the Jewish character
of an intellectual movement by recruiting token gentiles for visible
positions as spokesmen. He writes that this tactic was so common in
the American Communist Party that gentiles often saw through it and
resigned.
But how can motives ever be completely known? Prof. MacDonald sets a
difficult test: "The best evidence that individuals have really ceased
to have a Jewish identity is if they choose a political option that
they perceive as clearly not in the interest of Jews as a group. In
the absence of a clearly perceived conflict with Jewish interests, it
remains possible that different political choices among ethnic Jews
are only differences in tactics for how best to acheive Jewish
interets."
This standard may seem unduly harsh - until it is applied to white
gentiles. Third-World immigration, affirmitive action,
anti-discrimination laws, and forced integration are clearly not in
the interests of whites, yet many whites embrace them, thus
demonstrating how completely they have abandoned their racial
identity.
Finally, Prof. MacDonald raises the disturbing possibility that some
Jews, because of centuries of conflict with gentiles, actively hate
gentile society and consciously wish to destroy it: "a fundamental
motivation of Jewish intellectuals involved in social criticism has
simply been hatred of the gentile-dominated power structure perceived
as anti-Semitic." He describes the 19th century German-Jewish poet
heinrich Heine as "using his skill, reputation and popularity to
undermine the intellectual confidence of the established order."
In defense of this highly provocative view, Prof. MacDonald quotes
Benjamin Disraeli on the effects of centuries of Jewish-gentile
relations on Jews: "They may have become so odious and so hostile to
mankind as to merit for their present conduct, no matter how
occasioned, the obloquy and ill-treatment of the communities in which
they dwell and with which they are scarcely permitted to mingle."
Apart from any questions of motives, however, is the question of
numbers. Jews are a tiny minority in the United States and within that
minority there is disagreement even on matters that clearly affect
Jews. How can Jews possibly be responsible for dramatic changes in the
intellectual landscape? In Prof. MacDonald's vew, the explaination
lies in the intelligence, energy, dedication, and cohesiveness of
Jews. He attributes a great deal to the average IQ of Jews - at 115, a
full standard deviation above the white gentile average - and to
"their hard work and dedication, their desire to make a mark on the
world, and their desire to rise in the world, engage in personal
promotion, and acheive public acclaim... " He also believes Jews have
worked together unfailingly on any question they consider necessary
for survival: "Intellectual activity is like any other human endeavor:
Cohesive groups outcompete individual strategies." He notes that there
has never been a time when large numbers of white Americans favored
non-white immigration; it was a cohesive, determined minority that
beat down the disorganized resistance of the majority.
Prof. MacDonald believe that because of the effectiveness of some
Jews, it was not even necessary that most Jews actively support
anti-majoritarian movements, but that Jewish activity was still
decisive. As he puts it, "Jewish-dominated intellectual movements were
a critical factor (necessary condition) for the triumph of the
intellectual left in late twentieth-century Western societies." This,
of course, can never be tested, but there can be no doubt that
American Jews have had a disproportionate effect on the American
intellect. Prof. MacDonald quotes Walter Kerr, writing in 1968, to the
effect that "what has happened since World War II is that the American
sensibility has become part Jewish, perhaps as much Jewish as it is
anything else... The literate American mind has come in some measure
to think Jewishly."
Aside from the question of whether Prof. MacDonald is right is the
further question of what difference it makes if he is right. If
correct, his thesis certainly sheds light on the rapidity with which
whites lost their will. Just a few decades ago whites were a confident
race, proud of their acheivements, convinced of their fitness to
dominate the globe. Today they are a declining, apologetic people,
ashamed of their history and not sure even of their claim to lands
they have occupied for centuries. It is very rare for fundamental
concepts to be stood on their heads in the course of just a generation
or two, as has happened with thinking about race. Such speed suggests
there has been something more than natural change.
Stanley Hornbeck is the pen name of a Washington, DC, - area
businessman.
to Judaism or
Ravachol
werd in soc.culture.netherlands
door *wally* (irelan...@yahoogroups.com)
het volgende beweerd:
>Source: This book review originally appeared in American Renaissance,
>June 1999, Issue 54 under the title 'Cherchez le Juif' (Images
>Supplied).
>
Please, Fuck Off with yor lousy quoting and your Nazi bullshit from
soc.culture.netherlands.
I'm sure you're jerking off on old issues of "Der Stürmer" From Julius
Streicher.
--
Niek Holtzappel.
Homepage: http://www.xs4all.nl/~nholtz
For replying: Remove 'TAKE' and 'AWAY' from 'Reply-To:' address.
------------------------------------------------------------------
" All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. " ( Jack.N )
------------------------------------------------------------------
Larry W. Jewell
For people who fight hate:
http://www.hatemonitor.org/Research_links.html
http://www.splcenter.org/splc.html
Larry J, Certified black zamboni pilot
"Sunday's horoscope is noteworthy because of its strange,
sudden and wholly inexplicable occurrences, affecting
all phases of life." - "Your Horoscope," Los Angeles
Evening Herald Express, Saturday, December 6, 1941
GoldenArse
> 1) THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY SUMMARY
>
> We believe that a Jewish conspiracy to control the world and destroy
> European society exists based on the following evidence:
>
> 1. The Jewish conspirators have created, supported, and financed
> numerous European disasters including: World War I, World War II, the
> Cold War, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, Communism, Socialism,
> Liberalism, Capitalism, mass immigration, affirmative action programs,
> big government, forced integration, multiracialism, liberal media, and
> liberal schools.
Lookit fuckpipe, you lost your argument in the first line of a ten
page mindless diatribe. How the fuck did the Jews start all those
wars? Especially Vietnam. Oh, almost forgot, Ho Chi Minh was a Rabbi.
Take your racist shite somewhere else, you ignorant shitehawk.
GoldenArse
SCI Anti-Racist
wally
who are all the international bankers etc?
who controls hollywood and the media?
www.jewwatch.com
how come jews are loathed more than a group like tibetan buddists? for example.
the jews are like knackers with brains
, and if you read your history (not the kosher censored version) you will see that.
golde...@ireland.com (GoldenArse) wrote in message news:<cd412be6.01121...@posting.google.com>...
Kenneth McVay, OBC
wally <irelan...@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>educate yourself wanker .
> who are all the international bankers etc?
Most of them aren't Jewish, you idiot. If you had two functioning
neurons, of course, you'd know that.
I'm not remotely surprised that you don't - most racist assholes are
also unbelievably stupid.
You fit right in.
--
Burn your own DVDs with your CD-R & Software
http://www.roibot.com/w.cgi?R11956_dvdns
SK
news:9v34t3$1n3d$1...@news.tht.net...
> In article <914462ca.01121...@posting.google.com>,
> wally <irelan...@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
> >educate yourself wanker .
> > who are all the international bankers etc?
>
> Most of them aren't Jewish, you idiot. If you had two functioning
> neurons, of course, you'd know that.
>
> I'm not remotely surprised that you don't - most racist assholes are
> also unbelievably stupid.
Do your zionist masters pay you extra for this?
Morgan
golde...@ireland.com wrote on 12/10/01 1:20 AM:
> irelan...@yahoogroups.com (wally) wrote in message
> news:<914462ca.01120...@posting.google.com>...
>
>> 1) THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY SUMMARY
>>
>> We believe that a Jewish conspiracy to control the world and destroy
>> European society exists based on the following evidence:
>>
> Lookit fuckpipe, you lost your argument in the first line of a ten
> page mindless diatribe. How the fuck did the Jews start all those
> wars? Especially Vietnam. Oh, almost forgot, Ho Chi Minh was a Rabbi.
>
> Take your racist shite somewhere else, you ignorant shitehawk.
>
> GoldenArse
> SCI Anti-Racist
Well said GoldenArse.
cheers,
Morgan
Sterling, Alaska
Morgan
irelan...@yahoogroups.com wrote on 12/9/01 12:52 PM:
> Source: This book review originally appeared in American Renaissance,
> June 1999, Issue 54 under the title 'Cherchez le Juif' (Images
> Supplied).
>
Quit posting the megafiles. Put up a freakin website.
Morgan
Joseph M. Fogarty
impossible to convert to an ethnic group. Also, all Jews are not of the same
ethnicity, there are black Jews, white Jews, arabic Jews. The Jewish people
are neither an ethnic group nor a nationality they are something entirely
unique.
"Huw Waters" <h...@spookey.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3C1360B1...@spookey.co.uk...
Jerry Freedman
heroes whose sole purpose was to preserve Aryan culture. The early
conter-conspirators embarked on an ambitious program of intra/inter
generational inbreeding. Brother to sister, father to daughter for
centuries to develop an new kind of human with the perception and
ability to sniff out and confront the Jewish conspiracy. The new Aryan
elite ( never numbering more than the fingers of one hand-seven most
times). They were responsible for such classics as "The Protocols of
the Alders of Zine", an bave expose of the Jewish connection to
Arboretums throughout the world. The very sight of these wall-eyed,
drooling Aryan crusaders shuffling sidewise down the street carrying
their blankees strikes fear in the hearts of Jewish enemies..
wally
rome was burnt for example , by jews in 64 ad because we welcomed
people from all over the world into rome.
in a sense the jews are burning rome again today by encouraging
misgenation.
christianity is a religious coding of all the malign encouragemants
jews have to offer aryans.
nazism was just secualar judaism , replete with messiah/fuhrer .
hitler was elected , churchill wasnt , and roosevelt had opponents
assasinated .
the germans were forced to adopt nazism to protect them from jewish
communism.
edi...@rcn.com (Jerry Freedman) wrote in message news:<6c840ad4.0112...@posting.google.com>...
BERNARDZ
n.
A stupid person; a dolt.
Psychology. A person of mild mental retardation having a mental age of
from 7 to 12 years and generally having communication and social skills
enabling some degree of academic or vocational education. The term
belongs to a classification system no longer in use and is now
considered offensive.
[From Greek moron, neuter of moros, stupid, foolish.]
mo·ron'ic (m?-ron'ik, mô-) adj.
mo·ron'i·cal·ly adv.
mo'ron'ism or mo·ron'i·ty (m?-ron'i-te, mô-) n.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth
Edition Copyright © 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Published by
Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
Dave
Jerry Freedman <edi...@rcn.com> wrote in message
news:6c840ad4.0112...@posting.google.com...
wally
2001-12-30 19:25:05
IAP News
30 December 2001
Israeli occupation soldiers last night raided Palestinian homes in
several areas surrounding the town of Bethlehem, killing a young
housewife after beating here savagely on the head using the butts of
their rifles.
Hospital sources said Nujud Muhammed Ghuneim, 27, died of a massive
brain haemorrhage resulting from a severe beating that also caused hr
skull to rupture.
Palestinian sources in Bethlehem said several crack Israeli soldiers
raided Ghuneim's home at the village of el-Khader south of Bethlehem,
and as the young woman sought to prevent the soldiers from vandalizing
her utensils and house appliances, the soldiers reportedly started
beating her savagely on the head until she collapsed.
Here cousin Muhammed Ghuneim described the incident as "extremely
ugly."
"This is a reflection of the brutal ugliness of the Zionist-Jewish
mentality. Here, you had ten soldiers, and all of them ganged up on
the young lady, hitting her on the head without mercy until she died.
So, why doesn't the American media speak about Jewish terror?"
Muhammed said the occupation soldiers understand only the language of
death and murder.
"Nujud didn't pose any threats to those crack soldiers. She is a lady,
does any person in his right mind believe she posed any risk to their
lives?"
"If so why did they kill her? Why?"
"Dave" <fl...@btinternet.com> wrote in message news:<a0lihq$nvl$1...@knossos.btinternet.com>...
Harry Merrick
......."SNIP".......
It is terribly easy to be specious and vengeful, Wally, but whatever has the Jewish nation ever
done to you to deserve such vitriolic posts and bigoted remarks?
Where you ever *forcibly* circumcised by some secret society of mad Rabbi's?? - Perhaps that is
the problem! - SO bad for ones temperament and general behaviour, since my Doctor tells me that
circumcision makes one very impatient, bad tempered, and unable to suffer fools gladly!
That would rather explain the behaviour of a number of posters on these NG's, one does have to
say! :-))
Harry Merrick.
Lech K. Lesiak
> 30 December 2001
>
> Israeli occupation soldiers last night raided Palestinian homes in
> several areas surrounding the town of Bethlehem, killing a young
> housewife after beating here savagely on the head using the butts of
> their rifles.
Anyone have a credible source for this allegation?
Cheers,
Lech
na...@hotmail.com
Don't believe it, young man.
It is not possible.
SK
news:3C306FA1...@agencies.dnet.co.uk...
> wally wrote:
>
"SNIP - replaced":
>
It is a strange but typical response of personal attack over this post about
"Israeli soldiers beat Bethlehem housewife to death". We get daily
hollowcast posts by mcvay, a paid agent of zionist propaganda, about things
that may or may not have happened to Jews a long time ago. It would only
seem appropriate to have posts showing how close Israel came to nazi
Germany. If the historical significance escapes some, for the sheer irony
of it:-)
>
> Harry Merrick.
>
Dave
"wally" <irelan...@yahoogroups.com> wrote in message
news:914462ca.01123...@posting.google.com...
> British soldiers beat Irish wog called wally to death
> 2001-12-30 19:25:05
>
>
> IAP News
> 30 December 2001
>
> killing wally
> e after beating him savagely on the head using the butts of
> their rifles.
>
> Hospital sources said wally , 27, died of a massive
> brain haemorrhage resulting from a severe beating that also caused his
> skull to rupture.
>
> IRA sources in Dublin said several crack British soldiers
> raided wally's home and the soldiers reportedly started
> beating wally savagely on the head until wally collapsed.
>
> >
> "This is a reflection of the brutal ugliness of the British> mentality.
Here, you had ten soldiers, and all of them ganged up on
> So, why doesn't the American media speak about British terror?"
>
> Jerry Adams said the occupation soldiers understand only the language of
> death and murder.
>
> "wally didn't pose any threats to those crack soldiers. He is a queer like
Adolf Hitler and Enoch Powell,
> does any person in his right mind believe he posed any risk to their
> lives?"
>
> "If so why did they kill wall? Why oh why oh why?"
Des Higgins
"Dave" <fl...@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:a1g0ld$m5i$1...@paris.btinternet.com...
Dave
"Des Higgins" <fath...@eircom.net> wrote in message
news:dp0%7.25061$8s4.1...@news.indigo.ie...
Alec Owen
"Harry Merrick" <merr...@agencies.dnet.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3C306FA1...@agencies.dnet.co.uk...
I often wondered why I was such a patient, kind and good tempered fellow.
Now I know. I am still in the same condition as when I was born- in the
image of God, yet.
A Owen
>
Dave
"Alec Owen" <ao...@phaedrav.com> wrote in message
news:3c3f1e74$1...@audacity.velocet.net...
>
> "Harry Merrick" <merr...@agencies.dnet.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:3C306FA1...@agencies.dnet.co.uk...
> > wally wrote:
> >
> > ......."SNIP".......
> >
> > forcibly circumcised by mad
> Rabbis - Perhaps that is
> > was wally's problem! - SO bad for ones temperament and general
behaviour, since my
> Doctor tells me that
> > circumcision makes one very impatient, bad tempered, and unable to
suffer
> fools gladly!
> >
> Wally was such a patient, kind and good tempered fellow.
Now he has been savagely killed by British soldiers in Ireland, how
terrible.
> A. O'Wen
>
> >
>
>