POLITICAL SENSE AND NONSENSE PICKING YOUR BRAINS USING 'TOAD'

[Me]

On Jul 13, 8:06 am, Anonymous <cri...@ecn.org> wrote:
> http://www.aynrandmyths.com/
>
> m
>
> y
>
> t
>
> h
>
> s

I KNOW SOMETHING ABOUT THE WRITINGS ESPECIALLY ABOUT OBJECTIVITY,
ROMANTICISM
AND OTHER CONVENTION IN EXTREMISMS.

PLEASE THINK HOW TO DEAL WITH THE FACT THAT WRITINGS ARE NOT OF ONE
PERSON; AS THAT OFTEN IS PRACTICED NOW, EX. IN CASE OF BERTLAND
RUSSELL, ARISTOTELE,
AND EVEN PLATO. NOT TO LONG FROM NOW, NOT ONLY WE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO
GET TO ORIGINAL BUT IT WILL NOT EVEN MAKE SENSE.

IN CASE OF A. RAND YOU ARE ALREADY IN THE BUBBLE - AND DUE TO THE
COMPLICATION OF TRYING TO FRAME HER AS BOTH FASCIST AND COMMUNISM
WHILE THE ORIGINAL ONLY SHOWS THE OBJECTIVE ROAD, THEREFORE NEITHER
POLITICAL EXTREMISM, YOU ARE TODAY ANSWERING MORE TO: "WHAT I PROJECT
AND SELECTIVELY PICK OF A. RAND?'
AND NOT WHAT 'SHE'/THEY THOUGHT IN THE CONTEMPORARY TIMES.

Now , watch Brzezinkii, not just 'Toad' pronoucing that there is no
science in politics ( sorry. that is revisit : PBS May 2007), there is
no nsense and no nonse;
and , Ann, very soon no liberal exercising fascism up there.