Past-life Regression of Vincent Van Gogh's Ear - {HRI note 20090506}
Koos Nolst Trenite
6 May 2009
{HRI note 20090506}
I published this as reader's comment, in the Daily 'The Independent,'
in the UK.
(commenting on)
Book Review 'Was truth the biggest casualty in the case of
Vincent and his severed ear?'
Arts and Entertainment | The Independent UK
Showing the 'Self-portrait with Bandaged Ear and
Pipe,' painted in 1889 by Vincent van Gogh
"The history of art, and the history of ears, may never be
the same again. According to a new book, the painter
Vincent van Gogh did not slice off his left ear in a fit
of madness and drunkenness in Arles in December 1888: 'His
ear was severed by a sword wielded by his friend, the
painter, Paul Gauguin, in a drunken row over a woman
called Rachel and the true nature of art.'
(...)
Researchers at the Van Gogh Museum in Amsterdam, prefer to
stick to the familiar story: Vincent severed the lower
part of his own ear, wrapped it in newspaper and asked a
prostitute called Rachel, to 'keep this object
carefully'."
- John Lichfield in Paris, 5 May 2009
for 'The Independent,' UK
'
My comment, I titled
'Past-life Regression of Vincent Van Gogh's Ear'
On Wednesday, 6 May 2009 at 08:02 am (UTC), I wrote:
I have had this person in past life regression for tens of
thousands of hours. (Truth - that what happened and who caused
it with what intention - is absolute, and remains
contactable forever. Some of it I published.)
Also the story of the ear came up, of course:
He, Van Gogh - holding a razor blade and the intention to murder
him - was chasing Gauguin, "because" Gauguin 'destroyed' Van
Gogh's utopia idea, and "because" Gauguin wanted to leave.
Gauguin wanted to end living a degraded life of having nothing,
and thus he decided to leave Van Gogh and the "utopia" offered
to Gauguin by Van Gogh - offered however by the embodiment of
rudeness to people, of ugliness, of alcohol and drug abuse, of
sexual Energy vampiring, of evil in general, but wanting to be
immersed in a dreamworld of great artistic Energy that he had
stolen from great artists, to paint with, and so he was living
his lies about others and about himself - living all that
Vincent van Gogh was.
Gauguin had made known his decision, that he was going to leave
Van Gogh.
And Van Gogh - having run out of arguments and out of the
ability to deceive and to thus keep Gauguin there as his
"partner in art," Van Gogh - 'was going to prevent "that evil
act of Gauguin," that Gauguin "was about to commit" against the
"loving and caring and misunderstood" Vincent Van Gogh.'
Misunderstood he is indeed, NOT understood by Don McLean and
that singer's 'Starry Night' song "about the soul of Van Gogh:"
a person WITHOUT any love whatsoever for others, but of
extra-ordinarily forceful ability and intelligence to
deceive self and others, and a forceful vampire on the
Life Energy - on the abilities, also on the artistic,
painting abilities - of others, as I explained in
'Genuine Art - Producing It, Recognizing It'
{HRI 20021220} on 20 Dec 2002. (*)
I thought, it was a valuable person, a valuable artist - but in
fact, it became more and more apparent, that that person - that
soul - is a murderer by nature, a Life Energy Vampire by nature,
a compulsive liar about self and others, by nature.
But "it was my mission to make this person sane," and "past life
regression could make the most insane person sane" - so I was
made to believe, by another intensely evil individual who claims
to be a "humanitarian."
These together managed to convince me - in view of my rather or
infinitely great abilities and compassion and love for people -
that "I could succeed in that, in 'making the most insane person
sane,'
who of course needed to be made sane, forever to end its
evil force and intelligence and turn it into good forever,
and so I would do Mankind a great service forever, by
remedying that evil soul, now:"
A false mission to understand and "to remedy" the most intense
evil that does exist on Earth and beyond, and that - once again
- practically destroyed my life, my whole present life.
I did however come to understand a lot of evil, this time - but
also, that 'the claim and deception of evil itself, that "they
can be healed",' is just a method of evil: To feed on and absorb
the good intentions of people like me - like you - of those who
help.
Koos Nolst Trenite
human rights philosopher and poet
http://www.angelfire.com/space/platoworld
'
(I still added):
Re: Past-life Regression of Vincent Van Gogh's Ear
congenially wrote:
Wednesday, 6 May 2009 at 09:33 am (UTC)
(The rest of the story seems not to be known to all, and I should
have included it, above. So I include it now.)
Gauguin, by running away, managed to escape the pursuit by the
madman wielding the razor blade.
Van Gogh then, having failed to inflict bodily harm onto
Gauguin, remained stuck with the rage, with the Energy or
intention that he had created, and that he could not stop: to
bring about physical harm in the body of someone he hated, who
"deserved that."
And so he RELEASED that Energy - he "carried out his intention
anyway," as the madman computes and feels it - by cutting off
his own ear.
KNT hrp&p
'
Another reader, 'artsunlimited' wrote:
Wednesday, 6 May 2009 at 10:36 pm (UTC)
(...) his brother, who was his sole financial support,
took control and institutionalized him for two weeks.
After a series of psychotic incidents, Van Gogh did commit
himself in April/May 1889 after a public petition demanded
the police close up the "redheaded madman's" house. His
suicide was well over a year later.
(...)
Van Gogh's relationships with people were odd, he was
emotionally distant with family members and seemed
incapable of understanding emotional intent in other
people's actions. The "electric" friendship with Gaugin
was deep but troubled. Van Gogh showed ambivalence after
Gaugin left, but still had a lot of rage and sent him a
huge list of both petty and major grievances (...).
What isn't mentioned in [the review of the book] is, that
there's an early incident of self-injury - over a woman;
his first cousin, Kee Vos.
She definitely wasn't interested in him, the entire family
disapproved because it was almost incestuous, and Van Gogh
didn't "get," that she didn't love him.
Thinking she was being kept from him, he put his hand into
a kerosene lamp and demanded they let him see her for the
amount of time he could keep his hand in the flame. (...)
Van Gogh was a "cutter" by slicing his ear - that sort of
self-harm is symptomatic of borderline personality (...).
'
________
Footnote:
(*) 'Genuine Art - Producing It, Recognizing It' (GA)
{HRI 20021220}
(20 Dec 2002)
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.europe/msg/dc1388ffc08294fb
__________
References:
'Koos Nolst Trenite Anecdotes - Intending others to be decent
to each other - What is 'Zero Tolerance' actually'
{HRI 20060305-V2.5} (ZTA)
(5 March 2006 - Issued 7 Dec 2007 - Version 2.5 on 8 Dec 2008)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.military.naval/msg/9e8e54d71bdad00a
http://groups.google.com/group/Koos-Nolst-Trenite/msg/f078b7c6105fd1b4
____________
Verification:
http://www.angelfire.com/space/platoworld
Copyright 2009 by Koos Nolst Trenite - human rights philosopher
and poet
This is 'learnware' - it may not be altered, and it is free for
anyone who learns from it and (even if he can not learn from it)
who passes it on unaltered, and with this message included,
to others who might be able to learn from it (but not to sociopaths
specifically, because these vehemently oppose any true knowledge
of life and about themselves).
None of my writings may be used, ever, to support any political
or religious or scientific or artistic "agenda," but only to educate,
and to encourage people to judge un-dominated and for themselves,
about any organizations or individuals.
Send free-of-Envy and free-of-Hate, Beautiful e-mails to:
PlatoWorld at Lycos.com