can someone clear up a confusion for an ignorant english bloke.
I've always been wondering why Holland is called by two names, ie The
Netherlands, and Holland, and also why are the inhabitants of Holland
callled Dutch, which is neither a derivative of both names.
Thanks
Mark
In short:
Holland is the most powerfull part of the Netherlands since the 16th
century. It was called "De Republiek van de Zeven Provincien" (The
Republic of the Seven Provinces).
After 1815 it was "Het Koninkrijk der Nederlanden" (The Kingdom of the
Netherlands). This Kingdom covers The Netherlands, Belgium and
Luxemburg and the Dutch Colonies.
After 1830, Belgium became an independet country, including Luxemburg.
Dutch = Dietsch and means German.
Good writers about the duth histories are Jonathan Israel: The Dutch
Republic: Its Rise, Greatness, and Fall 1477-1806 (Oxford History of
Early Modern Europe)
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0198207344/qid=1051485515/sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/002-4755293-9796068?v=glance&s=books
and Simon Schama: The Embarrassment of Riches: An Interpretation of
Dutch Culture in the Golden Age
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0679781242/qid=1051485655/sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/002-4755293-9796068?v=glance&s=books
At this time 1/3 of the Dutch people are living in the western part of
the Netherlands.
People in the North, East and South of the Netherlands don't like it
when you calling them "Hollanders:. They are "Nederlanders"
E.g. Scotland and England.
><ma...@mwgary.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>I've always been wondering why Holland is called by two names, ie The
>>Netherlands, and Holland, and also why are the inhabitants of Holland
>>callled Dutch, which is neither a derivative of both names.
>
>Good writers about the duth histories are Jonathan Israel: The Dutch
>Republic: Its Rise, Greatness, and Fall 1477-1806 (Oxford History of
>Early Modern Europe)
>
>http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0198207344/qid=1051485515/sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/002-4755293-9796068?v=glance&s=books
>and Simon Schama: The Embarrassment of Riches: An Interpretation of
>Dutch Culture in the Golden Age
>http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0679781242/qid=1051485655/sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/002-4755293-9796068?v=glance&s=books
>
And the pleasant reading " The low sky : understanding the Dutch ",
by Han van der Horst
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/9055940399/qid=1051524456/sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/002-3932587-0847232?v=glance&s=books
mvg
keitje
http://www.xs4all.nl/~dekei/hollande.html#name
The Netherlands were a confederation between 7 provinces.
(Republiek der verenigde Nederlanden (+/- 1585-1795)
The most
powerful was Holland. Other provinces were Zeeland (You know it from "New
Zealand"), Gelderland, Friesland, Groningen, Overijssel and Utrecht.
Drenthe was also a menber of the Confederation, but had no voting rights
an tax duty. There were also occupied territories wich were part of
Brabant (Staats Brabant _now Noord-Brabant-), Vlaanderen (Staats
Vlaanderen _now part of Zeeland as Zeeuws Vlaanderen_) and Limburg
Before 1585, the Netherlands were a kind of confedaration with what is now
Belgium, with the provinces Vlaanderen (Flanders), Brabant, Namur,
Hainaut, Arras,
Flandre Wallon, Mechelen, Luxembourg and Limburg.
> Thanks
>
> Mark
>
>
--
Niek Holtzappel (Ravachol) Homepage : http://www.xs4all.nl/~nholtz
Meldpunt Gestapopraktijken Internet: http://hopje.xs4all.nl/~MGI
"Er ligt een roofstaat aan de zee, tussen Oostfriesland en de Schelde!"
(Multatuli in Max havelaar)