Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

France, french and the french

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Bokkie

unread,
Nov 18, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/18/98
to
What is the problem with those arrogant French bastards??? Many Europeans
wonder themselves every day. France is always doing the exact opposite thing
of what the other European countries want. Whole Europe wants Duizenberg as
president of the central European Bank, and France ... well, they are
against Duizenberg and have their own FRENCH candidate. Almost every country
in Europe wanted to punish Saddam Hussein severly, almost every country but
one: France. It seems that the French have problems with every decision as
long as it's not a French one. Besides that they have a very arrogant
attitude towards all other nations. Why is that?

History tells us that France played a very dominat role in Europe. We all
know Napoleon and we all know that France had many colonies in Africa, Asia
and the Caribean. But, unfortunately for them, they lost most of their
colonies. France was no longer an important global player. Let's face it.
What country is the most important nation in Europe? Some would say Germany,
others the UK. Germany has a stronger economy and the UK still plays an
important role. France on the other hand is definately not the most
important country in europe. Sure, they have nucleair bombs, but what does
that mean? Brazil has nucleair bombs as well, does that make them a world
player? I guess not. During the years France has become less and less
important. This process frustrates them.

Another painful subject is their language. The French claim to have the
world's most important language and everyone should learn it. But that's not
true. English is most used in the world and certainly while doing business.
Spanish is coming up as well, and might take over the position of french. In
the European Union both english and french are being used in official
documents. sure, all languages used in EU countries are official, but they
are not being used. I suggest we replace french with German. Which countries
are the dominant players in Europe? Germany and France. The UK is still
staying a bit quiet in EU affairs. But English is the world language in the
world, so we should keep that as an official language in the EU. So why
replace French with German? Because Germany has a much more important and
binding role in Europe. And there are more German speaking people in Europe!
Germany, Austria and Luxemburg have German as a native language.

Well, I think the French will hang me for this, but I don't care about that.
It's time someone said it.

Bokkie

JPC

unread,
Nov 18, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/18/98
to
In article <72um80$9dn$1...@news.worldonline.nl>, vern...@hotmail.com says...

>
>What is the problem with those arrogant French bastards???

Et un TVM pour le palais de justice de Lille! un!


George F. Hardy

unread,
Nov 18, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/18/98
to
In article <72um80$9dn$1...@news.worldonline.nl>, "Bokkie" <vern...@hotmail.com> says:
>
>What is the problem with those arrogant French bastards???

They cannot get over Napoleon. My answer to them? Germany
got over Hitler.

GFH

Jean-Yves COLLE

unread,
Nov 18, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/18/98
to
The differences of cultures and of thinking ways is the treasure of Europe,
you should be happy that all the people are differents, I wouldn't like a
Europe where everydody are the same.
I think Frenchs should continue te be themself as well as Germans and
Englishs... And because auf thoses differences, we are going to do a nice
Europe, taking advantage of those differences, we are not americans,
Frenchs eat frog legs, Germans "wurst", and English Jelly, I prefere that
to mac donald for evrybody.

CIAO
from a French living in Germany

JPC

unread,
Nov 18, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/18/98
to
In article <01be130a$61f501c0$619e...@hdimsun.fzk.de>, co...@itu.fzk.de
says...

>Frenchs eat frog legs, Germans "wurst", and English Jelly, I prefere that
>to mac donald for evrybody.

Et les TVM de l'EPO :)


Bokkie

unread,
Nov 18, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/18/98
to

>The differences of cultures and of thinking ways is the treasure of Europe,
>you should be happy that all the people are differents, I wouldn't like a
>Europe where everydody are the same.

Couldn't agree more. But let's not play stupid here. Even when all European
countries are on one line, Frnace starts making problems again. That has
happened so many times. Why is that? Starting troubles in the EU, NATO, UN.
Do the Frnech like problems so much??? Of course every country starts a
problem every now and then, but you guys do, that's becoming abnormal.

Bokkie

Bokkie

unread,
Nov 18, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/18/98
to

>
>Et un TVM pour le palais de justice de Lille! un!
>

This is a French guy with a short memory! Already forgot about Festina and
all those French cyclists.

Yves Dessaux

unread,
Nov 18, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/18/98
to
In article <72um80$9dn$1...@news.worldonline.nl>, vern...@hotmail.com
says...

>What is the problem with those arrogant French bastards???

The problem is not with the above group of people, but IMHO
it is probably with you...

>Many Europeans
>wonder themselves every day. France is always doing the exact opposite
>thing of what the other European countries want.

Well, there is a strong movement in France against what is called
"the single thought". In other words, against having everybody thinking
in the same way, acting in the same way, fucking in the same way and
being socially and politically correct. I prefer living in an E.U.
with X countries and X different opinions than in an E.U. with X
countries and a single one opinion! Sorry!

>Whole Europe wants Duizenberg as
>president of the central European Bank, and France ... well, they are
>against Duizenberg and have their own FRENCH candidate. Almost every

This is "un detail"!

>in Europe wanted to punish Saddam Hussein severly, almost every country
>but one: France.

Seems to me that this "attitude" prevented another gulf war last time!
Your problem is to think only to Saddam which is indeed a bad guy, and
not the the Iracqi people who have been starving for years...

>It seems that the French have problems with every decision as
>long as it's not a French one. Besides that they have a very arrogant
>attitude towards all other nations. Why is that?

Be smart! Try to find pout who's arrogant here!

>>History tells us that France played a very dominat role in Europe. We

>all know Napoleon and we all know that France had many colonies[...]


>France was no longer an important global player. Let's face it.

Yes. We know that. Note however that the country ranks 4th amongst
the world nations. But I do not see where is the problem!

>What country is the most important nation in Europe? Some would say...

This question is incredibly obsolete. If we are trying to build E.U.,
it is not to try to find out who is the most important, who is the
nicest, who is the smartest, etc! Don't think that you get this point...

>This process frustrates them.

LOL!

>Another painful subject is their language. The French claim to have
>the world's most important language and everyone should learn it. But

>that's not true. English is most used in the world and certainly ...

Don't think we claim that! What we *demand* is to keep the right of
thinking in French, studying in French, reading in French, defining
new concepts in French, etc... English, German and other langages
are not foes to eradicate...

>are not being used. I suggest we replace french with German. Which
>countries are the dominant players in Europe?

Looks to me that this qustion is really disturbing you. Forget
it, OK?

>Well, I think the French will hang me for this, but I don't care about
>that. It's time someone said it.

We do not hang people! We guillotined them! But do not worry
we have mercy for the sick ones. You will recover soon from what
looks like an intellectual diarrhea. Besides, it is not dangerous
at all and not contagious. Take real care of yourself!

Yves


Bokkie

unread,
Nov 18, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/18/98
to

Yves Dessaux wrote a noble reply, at least that's what it looks like. But
he's wrong on several points. I'll handle this guy in a few minutes. Just
wait...


Bokkie

Bokkie

unread,
Nov 18, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/18/98
to

>>Many Europeans
>>wonder themselves every day. France is always doing the exact opposite
>>thing of what the other European countries want.
>
>Well, there is a strong movement in France against what is called
>"the single thought". In other words, against having everybody thinking
>in the same way, acting in the same way, fucking in the same way and
>being socially and politically correct. I prefer living in an E.U.
>with X countries and X different opinions than in an E.U. with X
>countries and a single one opinion! Sorry!
>

Sounds nice, but really doesn't make sense. I never said you have to agree
with anything, nor did I say we should all be the same. Every country causes
problems sometimes, but you guys always create problems. Of all countries
you cause the most troubles. Except for Greece, but I don't take them too
seriously.

>>Whole Europe wants Duizenberg as
>>president of the central European Bank, and France ... well, they are
>>against Duizenberg and have their own FRENCH candidate. Almost every
>
>This is "un detail"!

Do you really need more??? If you do, then I'll give you some more


>
>>in Europe wanted to punish Saddam Hussein severly, almost every country
>>but one: France.
>
>Seems to me that this "attitude" prevented another gulf war last time!
>Your problem is to think only to Saddam which is indeed a bad guy, and
>not the the Iracqi people who have been starving for years...
>

No, no, no!!! You say the French prevented a gulf war last time. Good lord!
What you did was stupid. Last time (I'm not talking about this crisis) you
prevented a gulf war, that's true. And you had Saddam sign a few documents
in which he promised to let the UN observers carry out their tasks. So
Saddam signed those papers and France stated that because of their (and the
Ruskies') wise strategy a second gulf war was prevented. Yeah, but what
happened? Saddam started to obstruct these UN observers and he didn't give a
shit about threats of the UN and US. So much for this great peaceful French
strategy.

Yes, the people of Iraq are the true victims, but Saddam has to go. There
are 2 options to get rid of him

1) ask him to go
2) bomb him out of Iraq

Why does Saddam have to go? Because you can't trust the old guy. You can
have him sign all the contracts you want, it won't work. He doesn't care
about paper stuff. As long as Saddam is in control in Iraq, the region
remains unsafe. And your strategy of having him sign all sort of documents
won't change a thing.

Maybe you don't want Saddam to go. Is that a possibility? I wonder, do you
have large investments in Iraq???

>>It seems that the French have problems with every decision as
>>long as it's not a French one. Besides that they have a very arrogant
>>attitude towards all other nations. Why is that?
>
>Be smart! Try to find pout who's arrogant here!

I am smart. Very smart. And I already have found out who's arrogant, that's
why I wrote the message in the first place.

>
>>>History tells us that France played a very dominat role in Europe. We
>>all know Napoleon and we all know that France had many colonies[...]
>>France was no longer an important global player. Let's face it.
>
>Yes. We know that. Note however that the country ranks 4th amongst
>the world nations. But I do not see where is the problem!
>

Is that so? Let's see: US, Japan, Germany, UK, hmmm, that's already srank
number 5. But let's say you were on rank 4, that's even more reason for me
to not understand the frustrations in your country. All this de Gaulle crap
with the NATO. Don't play simple. France is afraid to lose his/her/whatever
rank (what rank that may be) in the world.

>>What country is the most important nation in Europe? Some would say...
>
>This question is incredibly obsolete. If we are trying to build E.U.,
>it is not to try to find out who is the most important, who is the
>nicest, who is the smartest, etc! Don't think that you get this point...
>

It is obsolete indeed! I couldn't agree more, but the French started that
stupid discussion. Best thing to do is to beat them with their own weapons
(don't take weapons literal).

>>This process frustrates them.
>
>LOL!

LOL indeed

>
>>Another painful subject is their language. The French claim to have
>>the world's most important language and everyone should learn it. But
>>that's not true. English is most used in the world and certainly ...
>
>Don't think we claim that! What we *demand* is to keep the right of
>thinking in French, studying in French, reading in French, defining
>new concepts in French, etc... English, German and other langages
>are not foes to eradicate...

Think you do! Who said you couldn't think in your own language? I never said
you should speak, think in another language. But we both know 2 languages
are mostly used in the EP, and I think French should be replaced with
German.

>
>>are not being used. I suggest we replace french with German. Which
>>countries are the dominant players in Europe?
>
>Looks to me that this qustion is really disturbing you. Forget
>it, OK?
>

How can i forget it if the French (media) is constantly reminding me???

>Well, I think the French will hang me for this, but I don't care about
>>that. It's time someone said it.

>We do not hang people! We guillotined them! bla, bla, bla

yeah, yeah.

>Yves


Bokkie


m

ubujean-ja...@wanadoo.fr

unread,
Nov 18, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/18/98
to
On Wed, 18 Nov 1998 15:40:17 +0100, "Bokkie" <vern...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

>What is the problem with those arrogant French bastards???

unquote two very poor exemples.


>long as it's not a French one. Besides that they have a very arrogant
>attitude towards all other nations. Why is that?

we have a stong feeling of our superiority, that is.


>
>History tells us that France played a very dominat role in Europe.

See?
unquote our colonies.


>What country is the most important nation in Europe?

U.S. I guess, not?

>Another painful subject is their language.

Try harder, and you most probably, would succeed.

>Well, I think the French will hang me for this, but I don't care about that.
>It's time someone said it.

we do not hang, this is a very untasty british fashion, we guillotine,
lot of blood, very pretty.

with love.

.
Vous avez juridiquement tort car vous étes politiquement minoritaires!

Enlevez ubu pour répondre.

John Lynch

unread,
Nov 18, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/18/98
to
In article <72v0qo$je3$1...@news.worldonline.nl>, Bokkie
<vern...@hotmail.com> writes

>
>Yves Dessaux wrote a noble reply, at least that's what it looks like. But
>he's wrong on several points. I'll handle this guy in a few minutes. Just
>wait...
>
I'd prefer it if you just fucked off, actually. I see you are posting
from Holland. You don't seem to have mentioned your own country's two
claims to fame: being the horticultural vandals of Europe; and, after
the Finns, being the second ugliest people on earth.
--
John Lynch

Sig removed until further notice

Bokkie

unread,
Nov 18, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/18/98
to

>I'd prefer it if you just fucked off, actually. I see you are posting
>from Holland. You don't seem to have mentioned your own country's two
>claims to fame: being the horticultural vandals of Europe; and, after
>the Finns, being the second ugliest people on earth.


Ah well, you see, I don't give a fuck about what you prefer. Are you from
the uk? You call us ugly???

John Lynch

unread,
Nov 18, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/18/98
to
In article <72v58b$nlj$1...@news.worldonline.nl>, Bokkie
<vern...@hotmail.com> writes
Ugly hardly does you justice

Luc BENTZ (ą titre individuel et portatif)

unread,
Nov 18, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/18/98
to
follow-up to soc.culture.french
[à suivre sur soc.culture.french]


Le Wed, 18 Nov 1998 15:40:17 +0100, "Bokkie" <vern...@hotmail.com> a
écrit:

>What is the problem with those arrogant French bastards???

If you begin like that, how may you expect a real discussion ? You are
just trolling, crossposting without using a "follow-up to" field.

[Si vous commencez comme cela, comment pouvez vous espérer une réelle
discussion ? Vous envoyez simplement un troll, en faisant du postage
croisé sans utiliser le champ "à suivre"]

> Many Europeans
>wonder themselves every day. France is always doing the exact opposite thing
>of what the other European countries want.

My impression was different. Look at the recent féderal poll in
Germany.

[Mon impression est différente. Regarder le récent scrutin fédéral en
Allemagne. - message personnel : pardon Bonnaud, je n'ai pu faire
autrement]


>Whole Europe wants Duizenberg as
>president of the central European Bank, and France ... well, they are
>against Duizenberg and have their own FRENCH candidate.

The true matter, for Europeans, is not WHO will be the head of the
CEB, but what it will used to. Some think it woud be good, others
think it woud be bad, but Duizenchet ou Triberg, at my humble opinion,
have the same conception of how a monetary policy must be ruled.

[La vraie question, pour les européens, n'est pas de savoir qui sera
le patron de la BCE, mais à quoi elle va servir. Certains pensent que
c'est bon, d'autres que c'est mauvais, mais, à mon humble avis,
Duizenchet ou Tribert ont la même conception de la conduite d'une
politique monétaire.]

>Almost every country


>in Europe wanted to punish Saddam Hussein severly, almost every country but

>one: France. It seems that the French have problems with every decision as


>long as it's not a French one. Besides that they have a very arrogant
>attitude towards all other nations. Why is that?

A confusion seems to exist in your mind between the American opinion
ans other nations opinion. On this point, I just add this (after
having readen the head of your message) : French troops of the Daguet
division (Koweit-Iraq campaign 1991) were more important than
Netherland's ones.
Overpassing polemic, the question is : how succeed in compelling
Saddam Hussein to respect UNO's resolutions. Answering this question
is won't be done by exchanging some usenets posts...

[Une confusion semble exister dans votre esprit entre l'opinion
américaine et celle des autres nations. Sur ce point, j'ajouterais
juste ceci (après avoir examiné l'en-tête de votre message) : les
troupes françaises de la division Daguet (opération "Tempête du
désert") étaient plus importantes en nombre que les néerlandaises.
Pour dépasser le stade de la polémique, la vraie question est :
"Comment réussir à contraindre Saddam Hussein à respecter les
résolution de l'ONU ?" Répondre à cette question ne se fera pas en
échangeant quelques messages sur usenet...]

>History tells us that France played a very dominat role in Europe. We all

>know Napoleon and we all know that France had many colonies in Africa, Asia
>and the Caribean. But, unfortunately for them, they lost most of their

>colonies. France was no longer an important global player. Let's face it.

I do !

[Oui]

>What country is the most important nation in Europe? Some would say Germany,
>others the UK. Germany has a stronger economy and the UK still plays an
>important role. France on the other hand is definately not the most
>important country in europe.

We are the best ones in anti-doping procedures and produce more (real)
cheese than there are days in a year... Seriously, Ariane is a
continuation of what we began, in the Charles de Gaulle era, with the
Diamond-1b rocket... and airbus is, now, a european success. Asterix
and Obelix know how to work out of their gallic village !

[Nous sommes les meilleurs dans les procédures anti-dopage et
produisons plus de (vrais) fromages qu'il n'y a de jours dans une
année. Sérieusement, Ariane est la continuation de ce que nous avons
commencé, à l'époque gaullienne, avec la fusée Diamant 1-b... et
airbus est maintenant un succès européen. Astérix et Obélix ont appris
comment travailler hors de leur village gaulois !]

>Sure, they have nucleair bombs, but what does
>that mean? Brazil has nucleair bombs as well, does that make them a world
>player? I guess not. During the years France has become less and less
>important. This process frustrates them.

Whos is frustrated ? You maybe. I could tell you "United Provinces"
are no more the very important European State they where at the XVIIth
century. Would it be useful in a discussion ?

[Qui est frustré ? Vous peut-être. Je pourrais vous dire que les
"Provinces Unies" ne sont plus le très important État européen
qu'elles étaient au XVIIe siècle. Cela aiderait-il à la discussion ?]

>Another painful subject is their language. The French claim to have the
>world's most important language and everyone should learn it. But that's not

>true. English is most used in the world and certainly while doing business.
>Spanish is coming up as well, and might take over the position of french. In
>the European Union both english and french are being used in official
>documents. sure, all languages used in EU countries are official, but they

>are not being used. I suggest we replace french with German. Which countries

>are the dominant players in Europe? Germany and France. The UK is still
>staying a bit quiet in EU affairs. But English is the world language in the
>world, so we should keep that as an official language in the EU. So why
>replace French with German? Because Germany has a much more important and
>binding role in Europe. And there are more German speaking people in Europe!
>Germany, Austria and Luxemburg have German as a native language.

I suggest that everybody learn the Luxemburgian language, which is not
German. It's not a dialect, but modern language nearest of which
Carolus Magnus, Western Emperor (+814) spoke.
The other way of considering this problem is to insure an official
recognization for all european languages... Especially in european (or
other international) institutions the choice is : "English only" or
"languages... several in which english and others". In fact, "English
only" would be "American only". I confess it's not my cultural choice.
[je suggère que chacun apprenne le luxembourgois, qui n'est pas
l'allemand. Ce n'est pas un dialect, mais le langage moderne le plus
proche de ce que parlait Charlemagne, empereur d'Occident (+814).
L'autre façon de considérer le problème serait d'assurer une
reconnaissance officielle à tous les langages européens. S'agissant
des institution européennes (ou internationales), le choix est
"anglais seulement" ou "plusieurs langues parmi lesquelles l'anglais
et autres". L'option "anglais seulement" signifie d'ailleurs
"américain seulement". Je confesse que ce n'est pas mon choix
culturel.

>Well, I think the French will hang me for this, but I don't care about that.
>It's time someone said it.

In France, capital punishmend disappeared in 1981 (and I'm proud of
that). Anyway, silliness is not a crime.

En france, la peine de mort a été abolie en 1981 (et j'en suis fier).
De toute manière, la bêtise n'est pas un crime.

>Bokkie


Luc Bentz
------------------------------------------------
http://www.chez.com/languefrancaise ou http://languefrancaise.home.ml.org


tecumseh

unread,
Nov 18, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/18/98
to
Sleek advertising and the power of money made MacDonald into what it is in
Europe. What do you want to do about it?

Jean-Yves COLLE wrote in message
<01be130a$61f501c0$619e...@hdimsun.fzk.de>...


>The differences of cultures and of thinking ways is the treasure of Europe,
>you should be happy that all the people are differents, I wouldn't like a
>Europe where everydody are the same.

>I think Frenchs should continue te be themself as well as Germans and
>Englishs... And because auf thoses differences, we are going to do a nice
>Europe, taking advantage of those differences, we are not americans,

>Frenchs eat frog legs, Germans "wurst", and English Jelly, I prefere that
>to mac donald for evrybody.
>

John Lynch

unread,
Nov 18, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/18/98
to
In article <36533a7b...@netnews.msn.com>, Ryan Meier
<nos...@nospam.com> writes
>IMHCO, I think Dutch women are quite beautiful

Holy shit

Azrifel

unread,
Nov 18, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/18/98
to
On Wed, 18 Nov 1998 19:06:14 +0100, "Bokkie" <vern...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

>Why does Saddam have to go? Because you can't trust the old guy. You can
>have him sign all the contracts you want, it won't work. He doesn't care
>about paper stuff. As long as Saddam is in control in Iraq, the region
>remains unsafe. And your strategy of having him sign all sort of documents
>won't change a thing.


Looks a bit like Netanyahoo from Israel who wants to build a "Great
Israel". Where have I heard that before. Maybe it was Arafat,
Milosevic, Saddam, Nasser, Adolf?

They are all sick stuborn people. Far from my bed, I do not care
anymore. Fuck 'm all.

>Maybe you don't want Saddam to go. Is that a possibility? I wonder, do you
>have large investments in Iraq???

Basra Stock Exchange gained 20 points today because of the good news.
Investment opportunity? Lets bomb the Stock Exchange!


>to not understand the frustrations in your country. All this de Gaulle crap
>with the NATO. Don't play simple. France is afraid to lose his/her/whatever
>rank (what rank that may be) in the world.

They are still mad on Brittan, who destroyed the French Fleet in 1940
to prevend the Germans from using it to attack the UK.

>>Well, I think the French will hang me for this, but I don't care about
>>>that. It's time someone said it.

>>We do not hang people! We guillotined them! bla, bla, bla

Hey, cool, we gave them a bag of stones, tied them up and threw them
into the river. You were a good person when you came to the surface
again. (lot of bad people here)


--
Azrifel, Djinnie van de Woestijn (Tiebeer)
Drinkt het bier Van Duizenden, eet nootjes Van Miljoenen

http://listen.to/TBear http://start.at/verbruik.motoren http://move.to/Icone
Ego scio me liberium factum <ICQ: 8322501>

Azrifel

unread,
Nov 18, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/18/98
to
On 18 Nov 1998 14:55:47 GMT, chad...@univ-lille3.fr (JPC) wrote:

>In article <72um80$9dn$1...@news.worldonline.nl>, vern...@hotmail.com says...
>>

>>What is the problem with those arrogant French bastards???

>Et un TVM pour le palais de justice de Lille! un!

A fine example of French problems concerning chemical analyzes.
They cannot keep the piss-molecules apart from the
Thetra-Hydra-Cabbinol-molecules.

It's the French favorite Virenque who must be kept in a secure spot,
let's blame the Dutch.

Azrifel

unread,
Nov 18, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/18/98
to
On 18 Nov 1998 16:00:04 GMT, chad...@univ-lille3.fr (JPC) wrote:

>In article <01be130a$61f501c0$619e...@hdimsun.fzk.de>, co...@itu.fzk.de
>says...


>
>>Frenchs eat frog legs, Germans "wurst", and English Jelly, I prefere that
>>to mac donald for evrybody.

>Et les TVM de l'EPO :)

Proven by your shitty drug labs, who cannot even spot the difference
between asperine and XTC.
Its the french saddo's Virenque and Brochard who used EPO.
Guess you ate to much paddo's?

Azrifel

unread,
Nov 18, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/18/98
to
On 18 Nov 1998 17:53:19 GMT, Yves.D...@isv.cnrs-gif.fr (Yves
Dessaux) wrote:

>In article <72um80$9dn$1...@news.worldonline.nl>, vern...@hotmail.com
>says...
>
>>What is the problem with those arrogant French bastards???
>

>The problem is not with the above group of people, but IMHO
>it is probably with you...

I think I'll learn French pretty soon to frustate you in your own
language :-)

Azrifel

unread,
Nov 18, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/18/98
to
On Wed, 18 Nov 1998 18:41:10 +0000, John Lynch
<jly...@ldta.demon.co.uk> wrote:

>In article <72v0qo$je3$1...@news.worldonline.nl>, Bokkie
><vern...@hotmail.com> writes

>>Yves Dessaux wrote a noble reply, at least that's what it looks like. But
>>he's wrong on several points. I'll handle this guy in a few minutes. Just
>>wait...

>I'd prefer it if you just fucked off, actually. I see you are posting


>from Holland. You don't seem to have mentioned your own country's two
>claims to fame: being the horticultural vandals of Europe; and, after
>the Finns, being the second ugliest people on earth.

I see you are posting from the UK and never ever have been in Holland
or Finland.
Beware, you might find out how pig-ugly most English girls are with
their clothes off compared to Dutch or Finnish.
Imagine that fat red head from wossanameit errrrr Spice Girls naked.
Puke in the bucket and not on the floor please.

I studie with a bunch of Finnish girls now and then and they are (with
a few exceptions) absolutely adorable. Love the Finnish accent when
they speak Dutch too.


Norwegian Shopping Centres are a great place to hang out too when you
want to see and fool around with some beautifull girls. So is
Fishermans Wharf in San Francisco.

I think the ugliest girls of Europe live in Belgium.

hch

unread,
Nov 18, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/18/98
to
Bokkie,

I gather you don't like the French!
The have their problems too.

hch

Luc BENTZ (ą titre individuel et portatif)

unread,
Nov 19, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/19/98
to
Le Wed, 18 Nov 1998 18:40:58 +0100, "Bokkie" <vern...@hotmail.com> a
écrit:

>


>Yves Dessaux wrote a noble reply, at least that's what it looks like. But
>he's wrong on several points. I'll handle this guy in a few minutes. Just
>wait...

Wait and see ?

DougX

unread,
Nov 19, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/19/98
to
In article <TiwjOJAG...@ldta.demon.co.uk>,
John Lynch <jly...@ldta.demon.co.uk> wrote:

}In article <72v0qo$je3$1...@news.worldonline.nl>, Bokkie
}<vern...@hotmail.com> writes
}>

}>Yves Dessaux wrote a noble reply, at least that's what it looks like. But
}>he's wrong on several points. I'll handle this guy in a few minutes. Just
}>wait...
}>

}I'd prefer it if you just fucked off, actually. I see you are posting
}from Holland. You don't seem to have mentioned your own country's two
}claims to fame: being the horticultural vandals of Europe; and, after
}the Finns, being the second ugliest people on earth.

You are being xenophobic again Lynch.

--
UK RADICAL CAMPAIGNS JUMP PAGE. Over 100 entries.
www.noid.demon.co.uk

DougX

unread,
Nov 19, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/19/98
to
In article <pCTt2BAI...@ldta.demon.co.uk>,
John Lynch <jly...@ldta.demon.co.uk> wrote:

}In article <72v58b$nlj$1...@news.worldonline.nl>, Bokkie
}<vern...@hotmail.com> writes
}>

}>>I'd prefer it if you just fucked off, actually. I see you are posting
}>>from Holland. You don't seem to have mentioned your own country's two
}>>claims to fame: being the horticultural vandals of Europe; and, after
}>>the Finns, being the second ugliest people on earth.
}>
}>

}>Ah well, you see, I don't give a fuck about what you prefer. Are you from
}>the uk? You call us ugly???
}>
}Ugly hardly does you justice

More xenophobia Lynch?

olivier Laurent

unread,
Nov 19, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/19/98
to

Azrifel wrote:

> [snip]


> I think the ugliest girls of Europe live in Belgium.
> --

Yeah we've got a lot of migration from Holland... ;-)

Stupid kaskop

A+

Olivier


Bokkie

unread,
Nov 19, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/19/98
to

>IMHCO, I think Dutch women are quite beautiful, perhaps the most
>beautiful in Europe. Spanish women are quite gorgeous as well...


This guy has a fine taste. But this Lynch asshole is talking stupid. Almost
90% of the world's male pop. knows that dutch girls are one of the most
beautiful.


Bokkie

John Lynch

unread,
Nov 19, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/19/98
to
In article <731ii2$823$1...@news.worldonline.nl>, Bokkie
<vern...@hotmail.com> writes
You missed the word 'cows' from the end of your post

azr...@my-dejanews.com

unread,
Nov 19, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/19/98
to
In article <36542093...@arcadis.be>,

olivier Laurent <olau...@arcadis.be> wrote:
>
>
> Azrifel wrote:

> > [snip]
> > I think the ugliest girls of Europe live in Belgium.

> Yeah we've got a lot of migration from Holland... ;-)

We want to get rid of these ugly pigheads as soon as possible.

> Stupid kaskop

Leer Nedehrlands pratuh mahn!


> Olivier

--
Azrifel, Djinnie of the Dessert
Hide your women, close the pub!
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/B

-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own

olivier Laurent

unread,
Nov 19, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/19/98
to

azr...@my-dejanews.com wrote:

> [snip]


> > Yeah we've got a lot of migration from Holland... ;-)
>
> We want to get rid of these ugly pigheads as soon as possible.
>

Well considering the number of your caravan, it is the whole population
that you are trying to put out of the netherlands :-D

[snip]

A+

Olivier

Fustigator

unread,
Nov 20, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/20/98
to
Tu, olivier Laurent <olau...@arcadis.be>, die Thu, 19 Nov 1998
14:43:48 +0100, in foro soc.culture.belgium (et aliis) scripsisti:

>
>
>Azrifel wrote:
>
>> [snip]
>> I think the ugliest girls of Europe live in Belgium.

>> --


>
>Yeah we've got a lot of migration from Holland... ;-)
>

>Stupid kaskop
>
kAAskop!

aurtograffe, mon shair!
>A+
>
>Olivier

Phusty
http://oehoeboeroe.icone.org/scn/scn.htm

Peter H.M. Brooks

unread,
Nov 20, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/20/98
to
In article <731ii2$823$1...@news.worldonline.nl>
vern...@hotmail.com "Bokkie" writes:

>
> >IMHCO, I think Dutch women are quite beautiful, perhaps the most
> >beautiful in Europe. Spanish women are quite gorgeous as well...
>
>
> This guy has a fine taste. But this Lynch asshole is talking stupid. Almost
> 90% of the world's male pop. knows that dutch girls are one of the most
> beautiful.
>

Not all dutch girls, though I must say I was most impressed last time that
I was in Holland, there is something deeply erotic about girls on bicycles.

The most beautiful girls in the world live in Salzburg. I would like to live
there too, but it would be bad for my heart. I go all weak at the knees just
thinking about a few minutes on a Saturday morning in Salzburg - if there
were such a thing as heaven it would be there.

--
Peter H.M. Brooks


John Lynch

unread,
Nov 20, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/20/98
to
In article <911557...@psyche.demon.co.uk>, Peter H.M. Brooks
<pe...@psyche.demon.co.uk> writes

>
>The most beautiful girls in the world live in Salzburg.

I have never been to Salzburg and so can neither agree nor disagree. I
would, however, take some shifting from my view that the palm must go to
West Indian girls of very mixed descent -- there need to be significant
amounts of Chinese and Indian blood as well as African (too much African
produces bench-like arses* as they mature), with a drop of European.

*Imagine one of those benches that go all the way round a 300 year old
chestnut tree on a village green and you've got the idea

sch...@my-dejanews.com

unread,
Nov 20, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/20/98
to
In article <72v2a5$km9$1...@news.worldonline.nl>,

"Bokkie" <vern...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>Many Europeans
> >>wonder themselves every day. France is always doing the exact opposite
> >>thing of what the other European countries want.
> >
> >Well, there is a strong movement in France against what is called
> >"the single thought". In other words, against having everybody thinking
> >in the same way, acting in the same way, fucking in the same way and
> >being socially and politically correct. I prefer living in an E.U.
> >with X countries and X different opinions than in an E.U. with X
> >countries and a single one opinion! Sorry!
> >
>
> Sounds nice, but really doesn't make sense. I never said you have to agree
> with anything, nor did I say we should all be the same. Every country causes
> problems sometimes, but you guys always create problems. Of all countries
> you cause the most troubles.

Actually the US & Russia would be bigger contenders for that.

> Except for Greece, but I don't take them too
> seriously.

Greece? Outside of the ongoing Cyprus & macedonian issues, they don't do
too much.


> >
> >>in Europe wanted to punish Saddam Hussein severly, almost every country
> >>but one: France.
> >
> >Seems to me that this "attitude" prevented another gulf war last time!
> >Your problem is to think only to Saddam which is indeed a bad guy, and
> >not the the Iracqi people who have been starving for years...
> >
>
> No, no, no!!! You say the French prevented a gulf war last time. Good lord!
> What you did was stupid. Last time (I'm not talking about this crisis) you
> prevented a gulf war, that's true. And you had Saddam sign a few documents
> in which he promised to let the UN observers carry out their tasks. So
> Saddam signed those papers and France stated that because of their (and the
> Ruskies') wise strategy a second gulf war was prevented. Yeah, but what
> happened? Saddam started to obstruct these UN observers and he didn't give a
> shit about threats of the UN and US. So much for this great peaceful French
> strategy.
>
> Yes, the people of Iraq are the true victims, but Saddam has to go. There
> are 2 options to get rid of him
>
> 1) ask him to go
> 2) bomb him out of Iraq

And once he leaves, yet another dictator will come along, one who just
might be worse. That's how Hitler & Lenin came along. Get rid of that
nasty Kaiser, get rid of that Czar.....


> Why does Saddam have to go? Because you can't trust the old guy.

You can't trust any politican. Until '87, the US supplied Saddam with
Billions in arms because he was fighting the US's "enemy" Iran. Private
British, French, and Belgian countries also sold to him. And Saddam's
Chemical Weapons came from German companies.

> As long as Saddam is in control in Iraq, the region
> remains unsafe.

Yea and Iran, Armenia, Turkey, Lebbanon, Syria, & Israel are safe places?


> >>It seems that the French have problems with every decision as
> >>long as it's not a French one. Besides that they have a very arrogant
> >>attitude towards all other nations. Why is that?
> >
> >Be smart! Try to find pout who's arrogant here!
>
> I am smart. Very smart.

The average person thinks he isn't....:)


> >
> >>>History tells us that France played a very dominat role in Europe. We
> >>all know Napoleon and we all know that France had many colonies[...]
> >>France was no longer an important global player. Let's face it.
> >
> >Yes. We know that. Note however that the country ranks 4th amongst
> >the world nations. But I do not see where is the problem!
> >
>
> Is that so? Let's see: US, Japan, Germany, UK, hmmm, that's already srank
> number 5.

Germany & Japan don't have permanent seats on the UN Security Council like
France does, and neither country as any military bases to speak of outside
thier home countries. The G8 + China are the most important countries
worldwide.


But let's say you were on rank 4, that's even more reason for me
> to not understand the frustrations in your country.

Your a Nederlander, so would that make you even more frustrated,
especially since Netherland's greatness was even further in the
past then France's and alot shorter?


All this de Gaulle crap
> with the NATO. Don't play simple. France is afraid to lose his/her/whatever
> rank (what rank that may be) in the world.

What country isn't? Netherlands & Denmark have strong vocal minorities, who
fear the EU will turn into a gloried German Union. And besides the economic
reasons, many of Norway's populaion raised the same objection.


> >
> >>Another painful subject is their language. The French claim to have
> >>the world's most important language and everyone should learn it. But
> >>that's not true. English is most used in the world and certainly ...
> >
> >Don't think we claim that! What we *demand* is to keep the right of
> >thinking in French, studying in French, reading in French, defining
> >new concepts in French, etc... English, German and other langages
> >are not foes to eradicate...
>
> Think you do! Who said you couldn't think in your own language? I never said
> you should speak, think in another language. But we both know 2 languages
> are mostly used in the EP, and I think French should be replaced with
> German.

If just speaking about the EU then French & Italian native speakers are about
equal to native English speakers. And worldwide French is the 4th most spoken
language behind Mandrin Chinese, Spanish, & English. German isn't a world
language & it's appeal in Scandinavia & Netherlands was damaged beyond repair
because of obvious past events.


---Oscar Schlaf---

"Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one. "
- Albert Einstein

Peter H.M. Brooks

unread,
Nov 20, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/20/98
to
In article <yHm7nAAa...@ldta.demon.co.uk>
jly...@ldta.demon.co.uk "John Lynch" writes:

I know about bench bums, very different from beach bums. I think that part
of the reason for Salzburg girls being so magnificent is the multitude of
influences from the Austro-Hungarian Empire, most recently, and from being
pretty central as far as migrations from the fertile crescent westwards
was concerned earlier. They tend to be tall with slightly olive complexions
and nordic faces that are more angular than, say, Swedish faces, and much
less coarse than the extreme seen in Norway or Finland. I am told that
icelandic girls are quite impressive too, but I have only met one or two
so I can't form an opinion.

The Yank term 'rubber necking' is quite apt when considering a place with
a moderate sprinkling of pulchritude such as Paris, Dehli, Cape Town or Bristol.
In Salzburg there is no need to exercise the neck muscles, goes one stunner
away comes another in her place more magnificent still.

One of the manifold delights of being male.

--
Peter H.M. Brooks


John Lynch

unread,
Nov 20, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/20/98
to
In article <911562...@psyche.demon.co.uk>, Peter H.M. Brooks
<pe...@psyche.demon.co.uk> writes

>I know about bench bums, very different from beach bums. I think that part
>of the reason for Salzburg girls being so magnificent is the multitude of
>influences from the Austro-Hungarian Empire, most recently, and from being
>pretty central as far as migrations from the fertile crescent westwards
>was concerned earlier.

That's it, isn't it? I often think my own magnificent appearance must be
due to the blood of many races circulating in my potent veins

>They tend to be tall with slightly olive complexions
>and nordic faces that are more angular than, say, Swedish faces, and much
>less coarse than the extreme seen in Norway or Finland. I am told that
>icelandic girls are quite impressive too, but I have only met one or two
>so I can't form an opinion.
>
>The Yank term 'rubber necking' is quite apt when considering a place with
>a moderate sprinkling of pulchritude such as Paris, Dehli, Cape Town or Bristol.
>In Salzburg there is no need to exercise the neck muscles, goes one stunner
>away comes another in her place more magnificent still.

Other muscles no doubt exercise themselves

olivier Laurent

unread,
Nov 20, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/20/98
to

Fustigator wrote:

> Tu, olivier Laurent <olau...@arcadis.be>, die Thu, 19 Nov 1998
> 14:43:48 +0100, in foro soc.culture.belgium (et aliis) scripsisti:
>
> >
> >
> >Azrifel wrote:
> >
> >> [snip]
> >> I think the ugliest girls of Europe live in Belgium.
> >> --
> >
> >Yeah we've got a lot of migration from Holland... ;-)
> >
> >Stupid kaskop
> >
> kAAskop!
>

Mea culpa :-/ (pas frappé :o) )

> aurtograffe, mon shair!

A+
Olivier (retournant ce week end en ardenne faire des p'tits bonhommes de
neiges :o) )


Azrifel

unread,
Nov 20, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/20/98
to
On Fri, 20 Nov 1998 12:34:13 GMT, sch...@my-dejanews.com wrote:

>In article <72v2a5$km9$1...@news.worldonline.nl>,
> "Bokkie" <vern...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>> Yes, the people of Iraq are the true victims, but Saddam has to go. There
>> are 2 options to get rid of him

>> 1) ask him to go
>> 2) bomb him out of Iraq

> And once he leaves, yet another dictator will come along, one who just
>might be worse. That's how Hitler & Lenin came along. Get rid of that
>nasty Kaiser, get rid of that Czar.....

That's not correct. World War 2 is related with extraordinary payments
to France and the UK for the damage in the Great War. The failure of
Weimar and the sceptism of the old Milatary Leaders can be blamed too.
But the biggest mistake was to let Hitler have a go at the Elzas,
Tsjechoslowakia etc while the rest of Europe thougt: "When we let him
have this, Hitler will come to a rest and stop attacking other
countries."

Poland was the first victim of this idea and ultimately the Blitzkrieg
delt with the Netherlands, Belgium and France.

They should have attacked him when they still had the initiative. Its
clear that the damage-payments in Gold have contributed to the econmic
crisis wich gave Hitler the opportunity to get voted as president of
the Repuclic of Germany.

"Get rid of the Czar"
Whose idea was that? Was it a European Conspiracy, or were it just
simple Russian civilians and soldiers?

> You can't trust any politican. Until '87, the US supplied Saddam with
>Billions in arms because he was fighting the US's "enemy" Iran. Private
>British, French, and Belgian countries also sold to him. And Saddam's
>Chemical Weapons came from German companies.

And the famous Excocet Missiles and Mirages came from..........

J Prescott

unread,
Nov 20, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/20/98
to
On Fri, 20 Nov 1998 11:01:46 +0000, John Lynch
<jly...@ldta.demon.co.uk> wrote:

>
>*Imagine one of those benches that go all the way round a 300 year old
>chestnut tree on a village green and you've got the idea

I think that for male beauty, Ethiopians are supreme; tall, fine
featured and coal black. Imagine a proud standing ebony tree in a
sultry rain forest.

Joanna


J Prescott

unread,
Nov 20, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/20/98
to
On Fri, 20 Nov 1998 12:03:10 +0000, John Lynch
<jly...@ldta.demon.co.uk> wrote:

>
>That's it, isn't it? I often think my own magnificent appearance must be
>due to the blood of many races circulating in my potent veins

How can your veins be potent? They are like drain pipes. If the pump
goes wrong they clog up, they have no power of their own

Joanna


John Lynch

unread,
Nov 20, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/20/98
to
In article <365aab41...@news.demon.co.uk>, J Prescott
<joa...@lotos-land.demon.co.uk> writes

>>
>>That's it, isn't it? I often think my own magnificent appearance must be
>>due to the blood of many races circulating in my potent veins
>
>How can your veins be potent? They are like drain pipes. If the pump
>goes wrong they clog up, they have no power of their own
>
Shut up, Joanna

John Lynch

unread,
Nov 20, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/20/98
to
In article <3659ab2e...@news.demon.co.uk>, J Prescott
<joa...@lotos-land.demon.co.uk> writes
>
>>

>>*Imagine one of those benches that go all the way round a 300 year old
>>chestnut tree on a village green and you've got the idea
>
>I think that for male beauty, Ethiopians are supreme; tall, fine
>featured and coal black. Imagine a proud standing ebony tree in a
>sultry rain forest.
>
The forest would be his pubic hair, presumably

Aidan

unread,
Nov 20, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/20/98
to

J Prescott schrieb in Nachricht <3659ab2e...@news.demon.co.uk>...

>I think that for male beauty, Ethiopians are supreme; tall, fine
>featured and coal black. Imagine a proud standing ebony tree in a
>sultry rain forest.


There are many non-German people living Frankfurt. I am continually struck
by the dignified elegance of the Eritrean people here.

I don't think there are many rain-forrests in Ethiopia though.

Aidan.

Mark.J.Desocio

unread,
Nov 20, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/20/98
to

As far as the Saddam thing goes, I commend France for seeing through the
bullshit manufactured by the great Western propaganda machine. Whenever
the U.S. "goes after Saddam," or "teaches Saddam a lesson," more bombs
start falling on Baghdad (population of 4 million). (Has anyone heard the
latest? Apparently, Israel, coppying South Africa's lead, wants to
manufacture a plague designed to wipe out Arabs!!!)

You know, it occurs to me: all of the West's greatest fears about some
sort of post-apocalyptic post-industrial wasteland is being played out in
Iraq. All of the West's greatest fears about "anarchy," its greatest fears
about the Millenium Bug (Y2K): to see the genocidal results of such a
catastrophe, look no further than Iraq. They really have been bombed back
into the stone age. No running water, power, food, medical supplies, the
holocaustal spectre of so many children dying...

But the amerikan govn't officials keep saying: "Iraq could build weapons
of mass destruction within five years." And all of the puppets and
mannequins - that is, the herd, the masses who can't take their hypnotized
eyes off of the tv screen - gasp. To translate the bullshit: "Iraq could
rebuild a military within five years." (Every other country in the world
has a military. While I'm against them, Iraq w/ or w/o a military: who
gives a flying ...?"

Apparently, France, w/ a great tradition of thought stretching from
Rousseau to Sartre, Camus, de Beauvoir, Debord, Baudrillard, etc., with
its history of social protest, leading the way to the diminution of the
work week, has a thing or to it can teach its barbaric Security Council
conterparts, the U.S. and the U.K.

sch...@my-dejanews.com

unread,
Nov 20, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/20/98
to
In article <36598b7a...@news.demon.nl>,

azrifel@icone.!SpemBLOCK!.org (Azrifel) wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Nov 1998 12:34:13 GMT, sch...@my-dejanews.com wrote:
>
> >In article <72v2a5$km9$1...@news.worldonline.nl>,
> > "Bokkie" <vern...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> Yes, the people of Iraq are the true victims, but Saddam has to go. There
> >> are 2 options to get rid of him
>
> >> 1) ask him to go
> >> 2) bomb him out of Iraq
>
> > And once he leaves, yet another dictator will come along, one who just
> >might be worse. That's how Hitler & Lenin came along. Get rid of that
> >nasty Kaiser, get rid of that Czar.....
>
> That's not correct. World War 2 is related with extraordinary payments
> to France and the UK for the damage in the Great War.

By removing the Kaiser and forcing Germany to pay reperations, France &
Britain hoped Germany wouldn't be a threat to them again. Some in the UN & US
think by keeping sactions & removing Saddam will mean Iraq wont be a threat
again...


> "Get rid of the Czar"
> Whose idea was that? Was it a European Conspiracy, or were it just
> simple Russian civilians and soldiers?

Prior to WWI most of the Russian communists were in exile, but via
German & Austria help they got back to Russia.


> > You can't trust any politican. Until '87, the US supplied Saddam with
> >Billions in arms because he was fighting the US's "enemy" Iran. Private
> >British, French, and Belgian countries also sold to him. And Saddam's
> >Chemical Weapons came from German companies.
>

> And the famous Excocet Missiles and Mirages came from..........

From a private French company. But as I just pointed out Iraq was an "ally"
of NATO and France, Belgium, & Germany were following the US's lead in
suppling Saddam. Reaping what you sow....

---Oscar Schlaf----


"I don't want to achieve immortality through my work; I want to achieve
immortality through not dying. "
- Woody Allen

Fustigator

unread,
Nov 20, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/20/98
to
Tu, olivier Laurent <olau...@arcadis.be>, die Fri, 20 Nov 1998
15:29:44 +0200, in foro soc.culture.belgium (et aliis) scripsisti:

Tudwapa pluto swive dékour daurto graf, para zar?

Gusti
http://oehoeboeroe.icone.org/scn/scn.htm

olivier Laurent

unread,
Nov 21, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/21/98
to

Fustigator wrote:

> [snip]>A+


> >Olivier (retournant ce week end en ardenne faire des p'tits bonhommes de
> >neiges :o) )
> >
> Tudwapa pluto swive dékour daurto graf, para zar?
>

Nan ! (arrete tu me rappelles ma mere :-))) )

A+

Olivier


DougX

unread,
Nov 21, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/21/98
to
In article <y2qrrbAo...@ldta.demon.co.uk>,
John Lynch <jly...@ldta.demon.co.uk> wrote:

}In article <731ii2$823$1...@news.worldonline.nl>, Bokkie

}<vern...@hotmail.com> writes


}>
}>>IMHCO, I think Dutch women are quite beautiful, perhaps the most
}>>beautiful in Europe. Spanish women are quite gorgeous as well...
}>
}>
}>This guy has a fine taste. But this Lynch asshole is talking stupid.
Almost
}>90% of the world's male pop. knows that dutch girls are one of the most
}>beautiful.
}>

}You missed the word 'cows' from the end of your post

Xenophobic misogynist!

DougX

unread,
Nov 21, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/21/98
to
In article <rG$t3CA+p...@ldta.demon.co.uk>,
John Lynch <jly...@ldta.demon.co.uk> wrote:

}In article <911562...@psyche.demon.co.uk>, Peter H.M. Brooks
}<pe...@psyche.demon.co.uk> writes
}>I know about bench bums, very different from beach bums. I think that
part
}>of the reason for Salzburg girls being so magnificent is the multitude of
}>influences from the Austro-Hungarian Empire, most recently, and from
being
}>pretty central as far as migrations from the fertile crescent westwards
}>was concerned earlier.
}

}That's it, isn't it? I often think my own magnificent appearance must be
}due to the blood of many races circulating in my potent veins

Yes, the worst of many races combined into one godawful mess.

DougX

unread,
Nov 21, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/21/98
to
In article <wpFbcEAU...@ldta.demon.co.uk>,
John Lynch <jly...@ldta.demon.co.uk> wrote:

}In article <365aab41...@news.demon.co.uk>, J Prescott
}<joa...@lotos-land.demon.co.uk> writes
}>>


}>>That's it, isn't it? I often think my own magnificent appearance must be
}>>due to the blood of many races circulating in my potent veins
}>

}>How can your veins be potent? They are like drain pipes. If the pump
}>goes wrong they clog up, they have no power of their own
}>
}Shut up, Joanna

On his diet they must be clogged anyway.

John Lynch

unread,
Nov 21, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/21/98
to
In article <B27BFE43...@noid.demon.co.uk>, DougX <stickyourwretche
djun...@thislocation.lemon.co.jupiter> writes

>}>>
>}>>That's it, isn't it? I often think my own magnificent appearance must be
>}>>due to the blood of many races circulating in my potent veins
>}>
>}>How can your veins be potent? They are like drain pipes. If the pump
>}>goes wrong they clog up, they have no power of their own
>}>
>}Shut up, Joanna
>
>On his diet they must be clogged anyway.
>
That's an interesting point, isn't it, Dougie? Here I am, eating the
diet I have described and which you claim is so unhealthy, and the
quacks tell me my heart is in great shape, my blood pressure is
very healthy and I should live to my 80s or beyond. What can this mean?

J Prescott

unread,
Nov 21, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/21/98
to
On Fri, 20 Nov 1998 19:57:38 +0100, "Aidan" <ahu...@REMOVEc-s-k.de>
wrote:

No, it was literary licence.

Joanna


J Prescott

unread,
Nov 21, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/21/98
to
On Fri, 20 Nov 1998 17:54:28 +0000, John Lynch
<jly...@ldta.demon.co.uk> wrote:

>In article <365aab41...@news.demon.co.uk>, J Prescott

><joa...@lotos-land.demon.co.uk> writes


>>>
>>>That's it, isn't it? I often think my own magnificent appearance must be
>>>due to the blood of many races circulating in my potent veins
>>
>>How can your veins be potent? They are like drain pipes. If the pump
>>goes wrong they clog up, they have no power of their own
>>
>Shut up, Joanna

Make me.

Joanna


J Prescott

unread,
Nov 21, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/21/98
to
On Sat, 21 Nov 1998 05:21:07 +0100,
stickyourwre...@thislocation.lemon.co.jupiter (DougX) wrote:

>In article <wpFbcEAU...@ldta.demon.co.uk>,


>John Lynch <jly...@ldta.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
>}In article <365aab41...@news.demon.co.uk>, J Prescott
>}<joa...@lotos-land.demon.co.uk> writes
>}>>
>}>>That's it, isn't it? I often think my own magnificent appearance must be
>}>>due to the blood of many races circulating in my potent veins
>}>
>}>How can your veins be potent? They are like drain pipes. If the pump
>}>goes wrong they clog up, they have no power of their own
>}>
>}Shut up, Joanna
>

>On his diet they must be clogged anyway.

With a sedentary lifestyle, they would be. On the other hand, my
Grandmothers's generation ate a diet very high in animal fats: vile
things like pork crackling, but as they were very active physically
they all lived well into their 80s.

Joanna


John Lynch

unread,
Nov 21, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/21/98
to
In article <36589ef...@news.demon.co.uk>, J Prescott <joanna@lotos-
land.demon.co.uk> writes

>>
>>On his diet they must be clogged anyway.
>
>With a sedentary lifestyle, they would be. On the other hand, my
>Grandmothers's generation ate a diet very high in animal fats: vile
>things like pork crackling, but as they were very active physically
>they all lived well into their 80s.
>
Vile? VILE? I _love_ good, crisp, pork crackling. Fortunately, I have a
fine set of choppers (my own, natch) with which to eat it

Bokkie

unread,
Nov 21, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/21/98
to
Wow, you really are stupid!!!!! We have girls from the west Indies,
Indonesia and other former colonies in Holland. How can you say you find
them most attractive and ugly at the same time????

Bokkie

Bokkie

unread,
Nov 21, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/21/98
to

> Actually the US & Russia would be bigger contenders for that.

Yeah, but I was talking about EU countries and the US and Russia aren't
members of the EU.

>> Except for Greece, but I don't take them too
>> seriously.

> Greece? Outside of the ongoing Cyprus & macedonian issues, they don't do
>too much.


Obviously you have never payed attention to them

>> Why does Saddam have to go? Because you can't trust the old guy.

> You can't trust any politican. Until '87, the US supplied Saddam with
>Billions in arms because he was fighting the US's "enemy" Iran. Private
>British, French, and Belgian countries also sold to him. And Saddam's
>Chemical Weapons came from German companies.

Can well be, but he has to go now.

>> As long as Saddam is in control in Iraq, the region
>> remains unsafe.

> Yea and Iran, Armenia, Turkey, Lebbanon, Syria, & Israel are safe places?

What are you suggesting? Take them all down?


>> >Be smart! Try to find pout who's arrogant here!
>> I am smart. Very smart.
>
> The average person thinks he isn't....:)

oh?

>> Is that so? Let's see: US, Japan, Germany, UK, hmmm, that's already srank
>> number 5.
>
> Germany & Japan don't have permanent seats on the UN Security Council like
>France does, and neither country as any military bases to speak of outside
>thier home countries. The G8 + China are the most important countries
>worldwide.

Germany and Japan don't have permanent seats, you kwno why not? It's because
of WW2. The G8? Isn't Italy a member of that club? Come on.

> But let's say you were on rank 4, that's even more reason for me
>> to not understand the frustrations in your country.
>
> Your a Nederlander, so would that make you even more frustrated,
>especially since Netherland's greatness was even further in the
>past then France's and alot shorter?

Ah well, I'm not frustrated. And maybe I am, but the discussion is about the
French.

> All this de Gaulle crap
>> with the NATO. Don't play simple. France is afraid to lose
his/her/whatever
>> rank (what rank that may be) in the world.
>
> What country isn't? Netherlands & Denmark have strong vocal minorities,
who
>fear the EU will turn into a gloried German Union. And besides the
economic
>reasons, many of Norway's populaion raised the same objection.

Do we fear that? Well, I didn't notice that fear in my own country. We have
always hated the Germans, so that's not because of the new German Union.


>> >Don't think we claim that! What we *demand* is to keep the right of
>> >thinking in French, studying in French, reading in French, defining
>> >new concepts in French, etc... English, German and other langages
>> >are not foes to eradicate...
>>
>> Think you do! Who said you couldn't think in your own language? I never
said
>> you should speak, think in another language. But we both know 2 languages
>> are mostly used in the EP, and I think French should be replaced with
>> German.

> If just speaking about the EU then French & Italian native speakers are
about
>equal to native English speakers. And worldwide French is the 4th most
spoken
>language behind Mandrin Chinese, Spanish, & English. German isn't a world
>language & it's appeal in Scandinavia & Netherlands was damaged beyond
repair
>because of obvious past events.

I'm not talking about worldwide here, I'm talking about the EU. In the EU
more people speak German. Chinese, Hindu, Mandrin, I don't care! These
aren't EU countries, now are they? French & Italian? What's that supposed to
mean? English + Dutch + German is also a majority, so that doesn't make
sense.


Bokkie


fds


hgf

John Lynch

unread,
Nov 21, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/21/98
to
In article <736e3r$527$1...@news.worldonline.nl>, Bokkie
<vern...@hotmail.com> writes

>Wow, you really are stupid!!!!! We have girls from the west Indies,
>Indonesia and other former colonies in Holland. How can you say you find
>them most attractive and ugly at the same time????
>
Fuck off, Dutch gobshite

Rob Barends

unread,
Nov 21, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/21/98
to
In article <WUuCjWA4...@ldta.demon.co.uk>, jly...@ldta.demon.co.uk
says...

> In article <B27BFE43...@noid.demon.co.uk>, DougX <stickyourwretche
> djun...@thislocation.lemon.co.jupiter> writes

> >}>>
> >}>>That's it, isn't it? I often think my own magnificent appearance must be
> >}>>due to the blood of many races circulating in my potent veins
> >}>
> >}>How can your veins be potent? They are like drain pipes. If the pump
> >}>goes wrong they clog up, they have no power of their own
> >}>
> >}Shut up, Joanna
> >
> >On his diet they must be clogged anyway.
> >
> That's an interesting point, isn't it, Dougie? Here I am, eating the
> diet I have described and which you claim is so unhealthy, and the
> quacks tell me my heart is in great shape, my blood pressure is
> very healthy and I should live to my 80s or beyond. What can this mean?

What you call interesting I call boring. What it means is: Oh dread...,
Lynch is going to live another three years or so.

> Lynch

Rob


Rob Barends

unread,
Nov 21, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/21/98
to
In article <N$e0pCA6P...@ldta.demon.co.uk>, jly...@ldta.demon.co.uk
says...

> In article <736e3r$527$1...@news.worldonline.nl>, Bokkie
> <vern...@hotmail.com> writes
> >Wow, you really are stupid!!!!! We have girls from the west Indies,
> >Indonesia and other former colonies in Holland. How can you say you find
> >them most attractive and ugly at the same time????
> >
> Fuck off, Dutch gobshite

Shut up and get reduced to vapor by your own stench, pigfucker.

Rob


Rob Barends

unread,
Nov 21, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/21/98
to
In article <0ZBaQFAE...@ldta.demon.co.uk>, jly...@ldta.demon.co.uk
says...

> In article <36589ef...@news.demon.co.uk>, J Prescott <joanna@lotos-
> land.demon.co.uk> writes
> >>
> >>On his diet they must be clogged anyway.
> >
> >With a sedentary lifestyle, they would be. On the other hand, my
> >Grandmothers's generation ate a diet very high in animal fats: vile
> >things like pork crackling, but as they were very active physically
> >they all lived well into their 80s.
> >
> Vile? VILE? I _love_ good, crisp, pork crackling

Yah right..you're a real porker, aren't you, Lynch ?

Rob


Robert-Jan Veldhuizen

unread,
Nov 21, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/21/98
to
On 20-nov-98 11:22:45, Peter H.M. Brooks wrote:

PHB> In article <731ii2$823$1...@news.worldonline.nl>
PHB> vern...@hotmail.com "Bokkie" writes:

>>
>> >IMHCO, I think Dutch women are quite beautiful, perhaps the most
>> >beautiful in Europe. Spanish women are quite gorgeous as well...
>>
>>
>> This guy has a fine taste. But this Lynch asshole is talking stupid. Almost
>> 90% of the world's male pop. knows that dutch girls are one of the most
>> beautiful.
>>

PHB> Not all dutch girls, though I must say I was most impressed last time
PHB> that I was in Holland, there is something deeply erotic about girls on
PHB> bicycles.

You should try inline skating in the Vondelpark some time! :-)

--
Zorba/Robert-Jan


Robert-Jan Veldhuizen

unread,
Nov 21, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/21/98
to
On 21-nov-98 11:56:07, J Prescott wrote:

JP> On Fri, 20 Nov 1998 17:54:28 +0000, John Lynch
JP> <jly...@ldta.demon.co.uk> wrote:

>>In article <365aab41...@news.demon.co.uk>, J Prescott

>><joa...@lotos-land.demon.co.uk> writes


>>>>
>>>>That's it, isn't it? I often think my own magnificent appearance must be
>>>>due to the blood of many races circulating in my potent veins
>>>
>>>How can your veins be potent? They are like drain pipes. If the pump
>>>goes wrong they clog up, they have no power of their own
>>>
>>Shut up, Joanna

JP> Make me.

JP> Joanna

Is this behaviour typical for the average British woman after the Spice
Girls took over your country? I like it.

--
Zorba/Robert-Jan


Robert-Jan Veldhuizen

unread,
Nov 21, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/21/98
to
On 20-nov-98 13:34:13, schlaf wrote:

> And once he leaves, yet another dictator will come along, one who just
> might be worse. That's how Hitler & Lenin came along. Get rid of that
> nasty Kaiser, get rid of that Czar.....

Well you got rid of Mitterand... I guess your line of reasoning is thus
quite correct. Next up: Le Pen?

--
Zorba/Robert-Jan


Robert-Jan Veldhuizen

unread,
Nov 21, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/21/98
to
On 21-nov-98 00:52:09, schlaf wrote:

>> And the famous Excocet Missiles and Mirages came from..........

> From a private French company.

All big French companies are effectively state companies, that's why the
French economy is so bad.

--
Zorba/Robert-Jan


John Lynch

unread,
Nov 21, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/21/98
to
In article <MPG.10c08e658...@news.earthlink.net>, Rob Barends
<rbar...@earthlink.net> writes
What stunning wit

John Lynch

unread,
Nov 21, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/21/98
to
In article <MPG.10c08ed16...@news.earthlink.net>, Rob Barends
<rbar...@earthlink.net> writes
>In article <N$e0pCA6P...@ldta.demon.co.uk>, jly...@ldta.demon.co.uk
>says...

>> In article <736e3r$527$1...@news.worldonline.nl>, Bokkie
>> <vern...@hotmail.com> writes
>> >Wow, you really are stupid!!!!! We have girls from the west Indies,
>> >Indonesia and other former colonies in Holland. How can you say you find
>> >them most attractive and ugly at the same time????
>> >
>> Fuck off, Dutch gobshite
>
>Shut up and get reduced to vapor by your own stench, pigfucker.
>
More brilliance. Wow!

J Prescott

unread,
Nov 21, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/21/98
to
On Sat, 21 Nov 1998 12:10:44 +0000, John Lynch
<jly...@ldta.demon.co.uk> wrote:

>Vile? VILE? I _love_ good, crisp, pork crackling. Fortunately, I have a
>fine set of choppers (my own, natch) with which to eat it

I cooked roast pork for my mother and to be polite I tried eating it
myself, for the first time in over 15 years. Just lean meat made me
nauseous. I should have known better, though strangely I can eat wild
boar.

Joanna

John Lynch

unread,
Nov 21, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/21/98
to
In article <3656ee06...@news.demon.co.uk>, J Prescott
<joa...@lotos-land.demon.co.uk> writes
>

>>Vile? VILE? I _love_ good, crisp, pork crackling. Fortunately, I have a
>>fine set of choppers (my own, natch) with which to eat it
>
>I cooked roast pork for my mother and to be polite I tried eating it
>myself, for the first time in over 15 years. Just lean meat made me
>nauseous. I should have known better, though strangely I can eat wild
>boar.
>
The last bit could be the key. Normal mass produced pork is bland,
tasteless, has the consistency of wet cardboard and is not worth eating.
Nor does it allow you to produce good crackling. Properly reared pork,
otoh, has excellent taste and consistency.

sch...@my-dejanews.com

unread,
Nov 21, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/21/98
to
In article <736err$5ss$1...@news.worldonline.nl>,

"Bokkie" <vern...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Actually the US & Russia would be bigger contenders for that.
>
> Yeah, but I was talking about EU countries and the US and Russia aren't
> members of the EU.

Yea but Britain is, and creates as many problems as France does. Both being
major world powers in thier own right until recently of course might have
something to do with that.


> >> Except for Greece, but I don't take them too
> >> seriously.
>
> > Greece? Outside of the ongoing Cyprus & macedonian issues, they don't do
> >too much.
>
> Obviously you have never payed attention to them

Heh, almost all the other antics stem from Greek annoyance with the EU & US
not doing enough about the Macedonian issue & Cyprus

> >> Why does Saddam have to go? Because you can't trust the old guy.
>
> > You can't trust any politican. Until '87, the US supplied Saddam with
> >Billions in arms because he was fighting the US's "enemy" Iran. Private
> >British, French, and Belgian countries also sold to him. And Saddam's
> >Chemical Weapons came from German companies.
>
> Can well be, but he has to go now.

His removal wont solve anything.


> >> As long as Saddam is in control in Iraq, the region
> >> remains unsafe.
>
> > Yea and Iran, Armenia, Turkey, Lebbanon, Syria, & Israel are safe places?
>
> What are you suggesting? Take them all down?

> >> >Be smart! Try to find pout who's arrogant here!
> >> I am smart. Very smart.
> >
> > The average person thinks he isn't....:)
>
> oh?
>
> >> Is that so? Let's see: US, Japan, Germany, UK, hmmm, that's already srank
> >> number 5.
> >
> > Germany & Japan don't have permanent seats on the UN Security Council like
> >France does, and neither country as any military bases to speak of outside
> >thier home countries. The G8 + China are the most important countries
> >worldwide.
>
> Germany and Japan don't have permanent seats, you kwno why not? It's because
> of WW2. The G8? Isn't Italy a member of that club? Come on.

Italy has a better economy & larger industrial output then any nation in
Africa or Latin America. So yes Italy is important.


> > But let's say you were on rank 4, that's even more reason for me
> >> to not understand the frustrations in your country.
> >
> > Your a Nederlander, so would that make you even more frustrated,
> >especially since Netherland's greatness was even further in the
> >past then France's and alot shorter?
>
> Ah well, I'm not frustrated. And maybe I am, but the discussion is about the
> French.

It's about your comments about the French.


> > All this de Gaulle crap
> >> with the NATO. Don't play simple. France is afraid to lose
> his/her/whatever
> >> rank (what rank that may be) in the world.
> >
> > What country isn't? Netherlands & Denmark have strong vocal minorities,
> who
> >fear the EU will turn into a gloried German Union. And besides the
> economic
> >reasons, many of Norway's populaion raised the same objection.
>

> We have always hated the Germans,

Until WWII, the Netherlands, next to the Swedes, were the most German without
actually being German. German culture held a position in the Netherlands, that
American holds now. The Kaiser afterall fled to the Netherlands, who gave
him an estate to live on....


>
> >> >Don't think we claim that! What we *demand* is to keep the right of
> >> >thinking in French, studying in French, reading in French, defining
> >> >new concepts in French, etc... English, German and other langages
> >> >are not foes to eradicate...
> >>
> >> Think you do! Who said you couldn't think in your own language? I never
> said
> >> you should speak, think in another language. But we both know 2 languages
> >> are mostly used in the EP, and I think French should be replaced with
> >> German.
>
> > If just speaking about the EU then French & Italian native speakers are
> about
> >equal to native English speakers. And worldwide French is the 4th most
> spoken
> >language behind Mandrin Chinese, Spanish, & English. German isn't a world
> >language & it's appeal in Scandinavia & Netherlands was damaged beyond
> repair
> >because of obvious past events.
>
> I'm not talking about worldwide here, I'm talking about the EU. In the EU
> more people speak German.

The EU does business worldwide....

> French & Italian? What's that supposed to
> mean? English + Dutch + German is also a majority, so that doesn't make
> sense.

No you misunderstand. France alone is equal in population to the UK, and
Italy alone is equal in population to the UK. So French ranks equal with
English as a spoken language within the EU.

---Oscar Schlaf---

-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------

http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own

ANGLARD IMMOBILIER

unread,
Nov 21, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/21/98
to
stupid discussion !?

hch <hen...@home.com> a écrit dans l'article
<u6B42.388$a76.3...@news.rdc1.on.wave.home.com>...
> Bokkie,
>
> I gather you don't like the French!
> The have their problems too.
>
> hch
>
>
>
>
>

sch...@my-dejanews.com

unread,
Nov 21, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/21/98
to
In article <353.7629...@xs4all.nl>,

Robert-Jan Veldhuizen <veld...@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> On 20-nov-98 13:34:13, schlaf wrote:
>
> > And once he leaves, yet another dictator will come along, one who just
> > might be worse. That's how Hitler & Lenin came along. Get rid of that
> > nasty Kaiser, get rid of that Czar.....
>
> Well you got rid of Mitterand...

I didn't get rid of him. I'm not French. Ich bin ein Amerikaner, mein Vater
komme aus Deutschland zwar..

---Oscar Schlaf---

" A conservative is a worshipper of dead radicals."

Rob Barends

unread,
Nov 21, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/21/98
to
In article <g8MPJCAyivV2Ew$Z...@ldta.demon.co.uk>, jly...@ldta.demon.co.uk
says...

> Properly reared pork...

So you don't even care about the sex of the pigs you fuck, eh Lynch ?

> Lynch

Rob


Rob Barends

unread,
Nov 21, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/21/98
to
In article <0dDaxFAM...@ldta.demon.co.uk>, jly...@ldta.demon.co.uk
says...
> In article <MPG.10c08ed16...@news.earthlink.net>, Rob Barends
> <rbar...@earthlink.net> writes
> >In article <N$e0pCA6P...@ldta.demon.co.uk>, jly...@ldta.demon.co.uk
> >says...
> >> In article <736e3r$527$1...@news.worldonline.nl>, Bokkie
> >> <vern...@hotmail.com> writes
> >> >Wow, you really are stupid!!!!! We have girls from the west Indies,
> >> >Indonesia and other former colonies in Holland. How can you say you find
> >> >them most attractive and ugly at the same time????
> >> >
> >> Fuck off, Dutch gobshite
> >
> >Shut up and get reduced to vapor by your own stench, pigfucker.
> >
> More brilliance. Wow!

If you have nothing to say, say nothing...eikel.

> Lynch

Rob


Peter H.M. Brooks

unread,
Nov 21, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/21/98
to
In article <3656ee06...@news.demon.co.uk>
joa...@lotos-land.demon.co.uk "J Prescott" writes:

> On Sat, 21 Nov 1998 12:10:44 +0000, John Lynch
> <jly...@ldta.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>

> >Vile? VILE? I _love_ good, crisp, pork crackling. Fortunately, I have a
> >fine set of choppers (my own, natch) with which to eat it
>
> I cooked roast pork for my mother and to be polite I tried eating it
> myself, for the first time in over 15 years. Just lean meat made me
> nauseous. I should have known better, though strangely I can eat wild
> boar.
>

The butcher in Clifton sells excellent wild boar from time to time = I
believe that somebody farms them nearby.

--
Peter H.M. Brooks


Simon Patience

unread,
Nov 21, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/21/98
to

You've got to admit, that was pretty clever.

Simon.

--

John Lynch

unread,
Nov 21, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/21/98
to
In article <MPG.10c0ce818...@news.earthlink.net>, Rob Barends
<rbar...@earthlink.net> writes
>

>> Properly reared pork...
>
>So you don't even care about the sex of the pigs you fuck, eh Lynch ?
>
What are you, a half brain dead Dutch-American? or a wholly cretinous
Dutch-Canadian? Fuck off, twat.

John Lynch

unread,
Nov 21, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/21/98
to
In article <MPG.10c0cde77...@news.earthlink.net>, Rob Barends
<rbar...@earthlink.net> writes

>> >> >Wow, you really are stupid!!!!! We have girls from the west Indies,
>> >> >Indonesia and other former colonies in Holland. How can you say you find
>> >> >them most attractive and ugly at the same time????
>> >> >
>> >> Fuck off, Dutch gobshite
>> >
>> >Shut up and get reduced to vapor by your own stench, pigfucker.
>> >
>> More brilliance. Wow!
>
>If you have nothing to say, say nothing...eikel.
>
>> Lynch
>
You're fucking off, then, are you?

Johnny Kidd

unread,
Nov 21, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/21/98
to
DougX wrote:
>
> In article <y2qrrbAo...@ldta.demon.co.uk>,
> John Lynch <jly...@ldta.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
> }In article <731ii2$823$1...@news.worldonline.nl>, Bokkie
> }<vern...@hotmail.com> writes

> }>
> }>>IMHCO, I think Dutch women are quite beautiful, perhaps the most
> }>>beautiful in Europe.

A little too tall...
Where is Procrustes when you need him ?


Johnny Kidd

unread,
Nov 21, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/21/98
to
J Prescott wrote:
>
> On Fri, 20 Nov 1998 19:57:38 +0100, "Aidan" <ahu...@REMOVEc-s-k.de>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >J Prescott schrieb in Nachricht <3659ab2e...@news.demon.co.uk>...
> >>I think that for male beauty, Ethiopians are supreme; tall, fine
> >>featured and coal black. Imagine a proud standing ebony tree in a
> >>sultry rain forest.
> >
as far as male beauty in Africa one would have to look to the shores
of the Mediterranean rather than the red sea


Rob Barends

unread,
Nov 21, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/21/98
to
In article <shHc+AAe...@ldta.demon.co.uk>, jly...@ldta.demon.co.uk
says...
> In article <MPG.10c0ce818...@news.earthlink.net>, Rob Barends
> <rbar...@earthlink.net> writes
> >

> >> Properly reared pork...
> >
> >So you don't even care about the sex of the pigs you fuck, eh Lynch ?
> >
> What are you, a half brain dead Dutch-American? or a wholly cretinous
> Dutch-Canadian? Fuck off, twat.

Ha ha ha ha ha ha ..... eikel! You will never know.

> Lynch

Rob


DougX

unread,
Nov 22, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/22/98
to
In article <0ZBaQFAE...@ldta.demon.co.uk>,
John Lynch <jly...@ldta.demon.co.uk> wrote:

}In article <36589ef...@news.demon.co.uk>, J Prescott <joanna@lotos-
}land.demon.co.uk> writes
}>>
}>>On his diet they must be clogged anyway.
}>
}>With a sedentary lifestyle, they would be. On the other hand, my
}>Grandmothers's generation ate a diet very high in animal fats: vile
}>things like pork crackling, but as they were very active physically
}>they all lived well into their 80s.

They didn't suffer from the ill-effects of intensive farming in those days.
Swings and roundabouts.

}Vile? VILE? I _love_ good, crisp, pork crackling. Fortunately, I have a
}fine set of choppers (my own, natch) with which to eat it

And a body weight to prove it.

--
UK RADICAL CAMPAIGNS JUMP PAGE. Over 100 entries.
www.noid.demon.co.uk

DougX

unread,
Nov 22, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/22/98
to
In article <N$e0pCA6P...@ldta.demon.co.uk>,
John Lynch <jly...@ldta.demon.co.uk> wrote:

}In article <736e3r$527$1...@news.worldonline.nl>, Bokkie
}<vern...@hotmail.com> writes


}>Wow, you really are stupid!!!!! We have girls from the west Indies,
}>Indonesia and other former colonies in Holland. How can you say you find
}>them most attractive and ugly at the same time????
}>
}Fuck off, Dutch gobshite

Xenophobe!

DougX

unread,
Nov 22, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/22/98
to
In article <0tHa9AAf...@ldta.demon.co.uk>,
John Lynch <jly...@ldta.demon.co.uk> wrote:

}In article <MPG.10c08e658...@news.earthlink.net>, Rob Barends
}<rbar...@earthlink.net> writes

}>> In article <36589ef...@news.demon.co.uk>, J Prescott
<joanna@lotos-
}>> land.demon.co.uk> writes
}>> >>
}>> >>On his diet they must be clogged anyway.
}>> >
}>> >With a sedentary lifestyle, they would be. On the other hand, my
}>> >Grandmothers's generation ate a diet very high in animal fats: vile
}>> >things like pork crackling, but as they were very active physically
}>> >they all lived well into their 80s.
}>> >

}>> Vile? VILE? I _love_ good, crisp, pork crackling
}>
}>Yah right..you're a real porker, aren't you, Lynch ?
}>
}>Rob
}>
}What stunning wit

At least it is the truth fatty, unlike most of your posts.

DougX

unread,
Nov 22, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/22/98
to
In article <shHc+AAe...@ldta.demon.co.uk>,
John Lynch <jly...@ldta.demon.co.uk> wrote:

}In article <MPG.10c0ce818...@news.earthlink.net>, Rob Barends
}<rbar...@earthlink.net> writes
}>


}>> Properly reared pork...
}>
}>So you don't even care about the sex of the pigs you fuck, eh Lynch ?
}>
}What are you, a half brain dead Dutch-American? or a wholly cretinous
}Dutch-Canadian? Fuck off, twat.

Xenophobe!

Anzuelo los Mosas

unread,
Nov 22, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/22/98
to
John Lynch schreef op 21-Nov-98:

>In article <MPG.10c0ce818...@news.earthlink.net>, Rob Barends
><rbar...@earthlink.net> writes
>>
>>> Properly reared pork...
>>
>>So you don't even care about the sex of the pigs you fuck, eh Lynch ?
>>
>What are you, a half brain dead Dutch-American? or a wholly cretinous
>Dutch-Canadian?

You got the picture. Partly at least. Not all of what you're saying
makes sence. But what else can be expected from a shitty xenophobic
hippopotomus from the UK?

> Fuck off, twat.

You're wasting your time, nitwit.

Anzuelo


Bokkie

unread,
Nov 22, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/22/98
to


>Fuck off, Dutch gobshite


That's weak! What about you being wrong?

Bokkie

Fustigator

unread,
Nov 22, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/22/98
to
Tu, John Lynch <jly...@ldta.demon.co.uk>, die Sat, 21 Nov 1998
21:07:42 +0000, in foro soc.culture.belgium (et aliis) scripsisti:

>In article <MPG.10c0ce818...@news.earthlink.net>, Rob Barends
><rbar...@earthlink.net> writes
>>
>>> Properly reared pork...
>>
>>So you don't even care about the sex of the pigs you fuck, eh Lynch ?
>>
>What are you, a half brain dead Dutch-American? or a wholly cretinous

>Dutch-Canadian? Fuck off, twat.

Lynch Lynch!
A work of public health and salvation which should be done at once!
Free humanity from that filth!

Fustigator

http://oehoeboeroe.icone.org/scn/scn.htm

J Prescott

unread,
Nov 22, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/22/98
to
On 21 Nov 98 17:25:56 +0100, Robert-Jan Veldhuizen
<veld...@xs4all.nl> wrote:

>On 21-nov-98 11:56:07, J Prescott wrote:
>
> JP> On Fri, 20 Nov 1998 17:54:28 +0000, John Lynch
> JP> <jly...@ldta.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>>In article <365aab41...@news.demon.co.uk>, J Prescott
>>><joa...@lotos-land.demon.co.uk> writes
>>>>>
>>>>>That's it, isn't it? I often think my own magnificent appearance must be
>>>>>due to the blood of many races circulating in my potent veins
>>>>
>>>>How can your veins be potent? They are like drain pipes. If the pump
>>>>goes wrong they clog up, they have no power of their own
>>>>
>>>Shut up, Joanna
>
> JP> Make me.
>
> JP> Joanna
>
>Is this behaviour typical for the average British woman after the Spice
>Girls took over your country? I like it.

It was my typical behaviour long before they were born!

Joanna


J Prescott

unread,
Nov 22, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/22/98
to
On Sat, 21 Nov 1998 17:30:26 +0000, John Lynch
<jly...@ldta.demon.co.uk> wrote:

>The last bit could be the key. Normal mass produced pork is bland,
>tasteless, has the consistency of wet cardboard and is not worth eating.
>Nor does it allow you to produce good crackling. Properly reared pork,
>otoh, has excellent taste and consistency.
>--

Yes, I'm sure you're right. Also, my stomach may have been acting as
my conscience. The way mass production pigs are kept is quite
horrific.

Joanna

J Prescott

unread,
Nov 22, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/22/98
to
On Sat, 21 Nov 98 20:14:52 GMT, pe...@psyche.demon.co.uk ("Peter H.M.
Brooks") wrote:

>In article <3656ee06...@news.demon.co.uk>
> joa...@lotos-land.demon.co.uk "J Prescott" writes:
>

>> On Sat, 21 Nov 1998 12:10:44 +0000, John Lynch
>> <jly...@ldta.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>> >Vile? VILE? I _love_ good, crisp, pork crackling. Fortunately, I have a
>> >fine set of choppers (my own, natch) with which to eat it
>>

>> I cooked roast pork for my mother and to be polite I tried eating it
>> myself, for the first time in over 15 years. Just lean meat made me
>> nauseous. I should have known better, though strangely I can eat wild
>> boar.
>>
>The butcher in Clifton sells excellent wild boar from time to time = I
>believe that somebody farms them nearby.

Which one, Peter? Clifton Down or elsewhere?

Joanna


J Prescott

unread,
Nov 22, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/22/98
to

As many male admirers are wont to do!

Joanna

John Lynch

unread,
Nov 22, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/22/98
to
In article <365b37b0...@news.demon.co.uk>, J Prescott
<joa...@lotos-land.demon.co.uk> writes
>

>>The last bit could be the key. Normal mass produced pork is bland,
>>tasteless, has the consistency of wet cardboard and is not worth eating.
>>Nor does it allow you to produce good crackling. Properly reared pork,
>>otoh, has excellent taste and consistency.
>>--
>Yes, I'm sure you're right. Also, my stomach may have been acting as
>my conscience. The way mass production pigs are kept is quite
>horrific.
>
You've been to Catford recently, then?

Peter H.M. Brooks

unread,
Nov 22, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/22/98
to
In article <365d39de...@news.demon.co.uk>
joa...@lotos-land.demon.co.uk "J Prescott" writes:

> >> >Vile? VILE? I _love_ good, crisp, pork crackling. Fortunately, I have a
> >> >fine set of choppers (my own, natch) with which to eat it
> >>
> >> I cooked roast pork for my mother and to be polite I tried eating it
> >> myself, for the first time in over 15 years. Just lean meat made me
> >> nauseous. I should have known better, though strangely I can eat wild
> >> boar.
> >>
> >The butcher in Clifton sells excellent wild boar from time to time = I
> >believe that somebody farms them nearby.
>
> Which one, Peter? Clifton Down or elsewhere?
>

Clifton Village, opposite the Indian, next door to the jeweller and just
down from Clifton Cellars.

--
Peter H.M. Brooks


J Prescott

unread,
Nov 22, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/22/98
to

No but I shall be near there in December.

Joanna


David John

unread,
Nov 22, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/22/98
to
In article <366a647a...@news.demon.co.uk>, J Prescott

<joa...@lotos-land.demon.co.uk> writes
>On Sun, 22 Nov 1998 17:02:31 +0000, John Lynch
><jly...@ldta.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>In article <365b37b0...@news.demon.co.uk>, J Prescott
>><joa...@lotos-land.demon.co.uk> writes
>>>
>>>>The last bit could be the key. Normal mass produced pork is bland,
>>>>tasteless, has the consistency of wet cardboard and is not worth eating.
>>>>Nor does it allow you to produce good crackling. Properly reared pork,
>>>>otoh, has excellent taste and consistency.
>>>>--
>>>Yes, I'm sure you're right. Also, my stomach may have been acting as
>>>my conscience. The way mass production pigs are kept is quite
>>>horrific.
>>>
>>You've been to Catford recently, then?
>
>No but I shall be near there in December.
>

Do you think Doug will be able to cope with excitement of this
knowledge?
--
David John


Johnny Kidd

unread,
Nov 22, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/22/98
to

And in the more westernised areas, one can notice how beautiful the
women are as well.

The Moroccan bourgeoisie - almost completely concentrated in
Rabat and Casablanca - are quite Europeanised, and wearing the
same clothes as their cousins across the Med, one can see that
the stylish young women there can match anyone in the world.
A walk around Casa or Tunis will reveal a great amount of
female beauty...


J Prescott

unread,
Nov 23, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/23/98
to
In article <NUoWWAAE...@concern.demon.co.uk>, David John
<da...@concern.demon.co.uk> writes

You forget, David, he's never met me so he doesn't realise how exciting
the knowledge would be.

Joanna


--
J Prescott

David John

unread,
Nov 23, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/23/98
to
In article <dp$0YDAGR...@lotos-land.demon.co.uk>, J Prescott
<Joa...@lotos-land.demon.co.uk> writes


I'm sure that even Doug is sufficiently perceptive to realise what an
excitingly good all-round chap you are. How do you *know* he [perhaps it
would be more accurate to say Doug] has never met you?
--
David John


It is loading more messages.
0 new messages