WTC Passengers Connected to Global Hawk (Remote Control Flight Takeover Technology)
Dick Eastman
Now we learn that there were more suspiciously present
people than the woman who wrote the expose of Hillary
Clinton aboard the remote hijacked crashombing aircraft.
And as you read about Global Hawk (remote control flight
takeover technology -- remember scientist Patty Doyle's theory
(www.rense.com) concerning the wave of deaths of top microbiologists, her
claim that each of these top researchers ignorantly contributed to
compartmentalized development of a "DNA target specific bioweapon" and then
were eliminated so that the tracks could not be retraced. Note how the
deaths of these Global Hawk developers would make tracing the frame-up
through the technology may now be out of the question.
Subject: WTC Passengers Connected to Global Hawk
http://communities.msn.com/TruthsPlatform/general.msnw?action=get_message&mv
ie
w=\
0&ID_Message=350&LastModified=4675360982787999979
From: GreyLmist (Original Message) Sent: 2/25/2002 9:12 AM
Passengers on hijacked planes connected to Global Hawk
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=Global+Hawk&hl=en&selm=1010454544.983.0.nn
rp
-0\
2.c2dead53%40news.demon.co.uk&rnum=2
For supporters of the "Global Hawk on 911-board" theory:
Did someone recognise that at least two passengers of the hijacked planes
had connections to "Global Hawk"?
(Look for the passenger list at GZ at
http://forums.delphiforums.com/n/mb/message.asp?webtag=ground_zero2001&msg=5
45.1 )
1) Herbert Homer, god bless him, was on United Airlines Flight 175, from
Boston, Massachusetts, to Los Angeles, California.
That was the second hijacked plane to strike the World Trade Center.
Herbert Homer, described as "..worked for Raytheon Co." was more than
only a
worker for Ratheon.
He was the DCE CACO under DCMC Commander - Col. Bryon Young of the RSC
Corporate Management (Raytheon)
Source: http://www.acq-ref.navy.mil/reflib/raytheon.pdf
Raytheon is the most succesful military-industrial complex, who is also in
charge of Haarp
(after they bought APTI from ARCO in 1994).
They also developed the SCUD-busting Patriot Missile, which was used in
the
Gulf War.
But Raytheon also developed Global Hawk, which is a "..high altitude, long
endurance unmanned aerial
reconnaissance system.." and includes "..Raytheon Systems (sensors)"
Source: http://www.airforce-technology.com/projects/global/
A coincidence? Sure, maybe.
But maybe Homer was on another "harmless" test flight, but not involved
how
it will end this time?
The other passenger with connections to Global Hawk:
2) Charles S. Falkenberg
He was on AA 77 American Airlines Flight 77, from
Washington to Los Angeles, crashed into the Pentagon with 64 people aboard
Falkenberg, god bless him too, was described as "..director
of research at ECOlogic Corp., a software engineering firm.
He worked on data systems for NASA.."
This looks already like another connection, but there is more.
We know that Global Hawk is a Military-NASA project:
http://www.vought.com/prodprog/military_nasa/globalhawk.htm
"..Northrop Grumman's Global Hawk is a high-altitude, long-endurance,
unmanned aerial reconnaissance
system designed to provide military field commanders with high resolution,
near-real-time imagery of large geographic areas..."
"..Vought was selected by Northrop Grumman in July 2001 to manufacture the
wing for Low Rate Initial Production (LRIP).
The contract is for two wings with an option for the next four aircraft on
the schedule.."
Both Ecologic Corp. and Northtrop got a lot of military awards:
".http://web1.whs.osd.mil/peidhome/st/st25/fy2000/STIllino.HTM.."
This is for sure no direct connection. The NASA is a big company, so this
connection doesn't count.
So we have to go more into details. Please don't be scared with the
technogical intro:
In 1997 Renu Chaudhry (Ecologic Corp) gave a workshop about EOS Data for
the
NASA.
"..The first phase of DataBlade development will ingest HDF-EOS Grid data.
Metadata will be in the file and Grid info in data objects in the
database.
The image will also be a binary object in the database..."
http://ivanova.gsfc.nasa.gov/hdfeos/notes.html
"..EOS-WEBSTER (a WEB based System for Terrestrial Ecosystem Research) is
a
digital library of
Earth Science data serving the needs of both the Earth System Science
community and the general public..."
We learn on that website that "EOS Webster" is a mapping system which
provides Landsat Images.
Charles Falkenberg worked also on this program.
"..The Federation GIS Services Cluster:.. We are very saddened to learn of
the passing of
Charles Falkenberg, an active member of this Cluster since its
inception..."
He is mentioned in the team of EOS Webster.
But why are landmap images important for "global hawk"?
http://oceanesip.jpl.nasa.gov/esipde.html
First of all: You need not to be a rocket scientist to know that the
GLOBAL
HAWK Program needs Landsat Images to work.
They don't use other images.
However they also explained, why:
"..Global Hawk Integrated Sensor Suite Thematic Mapper Simulator (TMS) -
The Thematic Mapper Simulator (TMS) is a Daedalus AADS-1268 scanner
that is flown on the ER-2 aircraft and simulates the LANDSAT Thematic
Mapper
(TM) instrument,
with slightly higher spatial resolution. The TMS is used for collecting
data
similar to data collected
by the LANDSAT Thematic Mapper with applications including Earth resources
mapping, vegetation/landcover mapping and geologic studies. The sensor
acquires data in 12 spectral bands.."
http://www.imagery-analyst.com/airborne.shtml
Here you find also, no surprise, the connection to Raytheon again:
"..We specialize in providing scientific, engineering, and software
support
in the areas of Space and Earth Science,
Scientific Data Management, Remote Sensing, Satellite Ground Systems,
Aerospace Engineering, Transportation
Management Technologies, Computer Networking, and Software Maintainence.."
Raytheon actually use these Daedalus Scanners.
Here it is described, what they need:
".Multi-band Identification and Discrimination Imaging Spectrometer
(MIDIS)
"
http://cdgrass.gtri.gatech.edu/MSIHSI_sumry.htm
In the Imaging Spectrometers -Summary Table it appears again:
Name:
Airborne Modis Simulator (based on Daedalus AADS-1268)
The Manufactor isn't mentioned, but the Operator: NASA
Also in this list:
MODIS Airborne Simulator by
Daedalus Enterprise Inc.
Operator: NASA Ames & GSFC
Multispectral Infrared and Visible Imaging Spectrometer
Daedalus Enterprise Inc.
Operator: "CNR, Rome"
The essence from what we learned is that these Spectrometers and Image
Mappings need the
Software EOS-Webster, ECOlogic Corp developed.
For sure only a coincidence. Global Hawk may need houndreds of different
softwares.
And every day a software developer dies.
But he had the bad luck to be involved in a "Global Hawk"- Conspiracy
theory.
So if someone installed the program into the four planes, we have to find
out, what happened
with the four machines before. A big job. Maybe without success.
Below you will find a list who is also involved in the "Global Hawk"
Project.
Northrop Grunman Corporation is one of them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Edited 12/11/2001 2:52:45 AM ET by EWING2001
From: EWING2001 Dec-11 7:41 am
To: ALL (3 of 7)
506.3 in reply to 506.2
Pt.2
More Infos about Global Hawk:
"..Global Hawk can carry out reconnaissance missions in all types of
operations. The 14,000 nautical mile range and 42 hour
endurance of the air vehicle, combined with satellite and line-of-sight
communication links to ground forces,
permits world-wide operation of the system.."
"..The program is funded by the Defense Airborne Reconnaissance Office
(DARO) and managed by the
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and the US Air Force.
Northrop Grumman Corporation, Ryan Aeronautical Centre is the prime
contractor and the principal
suppliers include Raytheon Systems (sensors), Allison (turbofan engine),
Boeing North American (carbon fibre wing) and L3 Communications
(communications system).
The Global Hawk air vehicles are built at the Northrop Grumman (formerly
Teledyne Ryan) Aeronautical facility in San Diego
In March 2001, the US Department of Defense awarded Northrop Grumman a
contract for the
engineering and manufacturing development (EMD) phase of the program, to
last until March 2003 and
in June 2001 a contract for two low rate initial production UAV's.
Global Hawk successfully completed a military utility assessment in June
2000, carried out at Eglin Air Force base, Florida.
http://www.airforce-technology.com/projects/global/
"..Friday, 18 Jun 1999:
Global Hawk - Unmanned Aerial Vehicle stays airborne for more than 27
hours.."
http://www.af.mil/news/radio/Jun1999/
A wild construction between these two people and Global Hawk?
Sure it is, but maybe not for the supporter of the Global Hawk theory.
They will be able to "construct" other connections with other passengers.
The guy who worked for Akamai or everyone who was a computer specialist,
or
electric engineers etc..? Sure that's nonsense.
But i found some other interested guys:
3) Kenneth Waldie (AA11), 46, of Methuen, Massachusetts, was a Raytheon
Co.
senior quality control engineer for electronic systems in Tewksbury,
Massachusetts.
He had worked for Raytheon for 17 years.
4) Peter Gay (AA11), 54, of Tewksbury, Massachusetts, was a Raytheon Co.
vice president of operations for electronic systems based in Andover,
Massachusetts.
He had worked for Raytheon for more than 28 years.
5) Wilson "Bud" Flagg (AA77) of Millwood, Virginia, a retired Navy admiral
and retired American Airlines pilot.
Actually the whole passenger lists look like a creme de la creme of high
technicians, but that should be yet another coincidence.
We will never find out what their reason for these flights have been.
Do we need a forth "test person" for the last of the four flights, UA93?
I couldn't find one. Maybe it wasn't important to "put testpersons" on
every
flight. Maybe it's really only a stupid sub theory.
This plane had anyway another tragic fate. It crashed in Pennsylvania.
PS:
Remember Huffman Aviation in Venice, Florida, where Mohammad Atta, one of
the hijacker took flying lessons?
Noone knows why he didn't learn in Europe or Sudan, even cheaper.
Now it's odd to know that Atta was also "..reported to have attended the
International Officers School at
Maxwell Air Force Base in Montgomery, Alabama..
..The Pentagon quickly disputed the reports, which had appeared in
Newsweek,
the Washington Post and the Miami Herald."
GZ reported that already in an investigation by Daniel Hopsicker, author
of
"Barry & 'the boys:The CIA, the Mob and America's Secret History".
He also wrote:
"..We know of at least one woman in Montgomery Alabama who has credibly
insisted to local reporters
that she met Atta at a party on the base. She remembers because she then
introduced him to her friends:
"Mohamed, meet my friend the Colonel.."
At the airport is a trapez by the Ringling Brothers & Barnum and Bailey
Circus, a school which owner
Kenneth Feld (according to a salon story) hired former top CIA honcho
Clair
George to torment a hapless freelance
writer for eight years because she wanted to write a book about his
family.
This Clair George "..ran Latin America for the Agency under then-Vice
President Bush during the period of Iran Contra during the '80's."
Source: Daniel Hopsicker at http://www.madcowprod.com/
GZ researched, too:
"..Air Force spokesman Col. Ken McClellan said a man named Mohamed Atta --
which the FBI has identified as one of the five hijackers of American
Airlines Flight 11 --
had once attended the International Officer's School at Maxwell/Gunter Air
Force Base in Montgomery, Ala..."
http://www.pressconnects.com/archive/attack/stories/091701N1.html
Ken McClellan is indeed still spokesman of the Air Force and furthermore
"..official spokesman for the office of the secretary of defense.."
http://ww2.pstripes.osd.mil/01/oct01/ed102401j.html
He just declared on October 24th, that the closure of Bad Aibling (a
ECHELON
base, but that's another story) has to be postponed for two more years:
"..The closure was postponed for two years to help fight America's newest
war, according to military officials in the United States.
"We basically couldn't get it done in time..." (Lt. Col. Ken McClellan)
Did McClellan make a mistake with mentioning Atta at Maxwell Air Base One?
It looks obvious, that he didn't say that on purpose, which was later
denied
by the Pentagon again.
But maybe it was only embarrassing for the Pentagon.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Edited 12/11/2001 3:22:46 AM ET by EWING2001
From: EWING2001 Dec-11 8:19 am
To: ALL (4 of 7)
506.4 in reply to 506.3
Pt.3
But what's so special about Maxwell Air Force Base in Montgomery, Alabama
(btw. Orville Wrights former Wright Flying School) ?
Maybe nothing for Daniel Hopsicker, Newsweek, Washington Post or Miami
Herald.
But for this topic:
:"..The Air Force has begun a series of wargames entitled Global
Engagement
at the Air War College, Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama.
These wargames are intended to illuminate the capability of joint air and
space power..."
These "wargames" include also Network Centric Warfare:
"..Future sensor grids will feature a variety of new imaging and signals
intelligence sensors,
currently in advanced stages of development, deployed aboard the Global
Hawk, DarkStar, and Predator unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs),
as well as new space-based sensor grids,
like the high and low orbit elements of the Space-Based InfraRed System
(SBIRS).
http://www.dtic.mil/execsec/adr98/chap15.html
So was Atta maybe involved in a secret "global hawk"-program?
Did he know that or not? I guess not, if he was on board.
Maybe that's the reason why he had to die or "committed suicide".
But back to the ranch.
It wasn't a global hawk flight, everyone will say.
That could be true. Because Bin Laden has no idea of Global Hawk.
He even has no idea how to spread videos in which he finally confirms that
he was the only mastermind. He ignores Al-Jazeera. What lame!
He forgot these videos in Jahlalabad. :)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Edited 12/11/2001 3:31:45 AM ET by EWING2001
From: EWING2001 Dec-21 5:15 am
To: ALL (5 of 7)
506.5 in reply to 506.4
News about Northrop, who build Global Hawk and from which we know, that
it's
an unmanned air plane project, which is already able to fly 72 hours
unmanned:
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20011220/bs/arms_northrop_dc_2.html
NEW YORK (Reuters) -
Dec 20 2:04 PM ET
"..Northrop Grumman Corp.'s (NYSE:NOC) chief executive on Thursday said he
was confident higher U.S. defense spending would boost sales, but he had
no
clear view on how the Pentagon would divide new funds.
Still, Chief Executive Kent Kresa said he could bank on at least one of
his
programs.
``Global Hawk,'' he said, stretching the words for emphasis. ''It's on
everybody's mind. Whenever they say transformation, they say Global Hawk.
So
it's very much a program that we'll see go forward.''
Northrop, maker of the B-2 bomber and warships for the U.S. Navy (news -
web
sites), produces the unmanned reconnaissance aircraft for the U.S. Air
Force, which now has four of them.
The long-range drone, capable of flying and loitering above a target for
24
hours, was used in the Afghanistan (news - web sites) campaign even before
completing testing, providing commanders with high- resolution, real-time
imagery of large areas.
Two more are in production to be delivered by the end of the current
fiscal
year, or next October.
Defense Department officials have noted the project is still in the
research
and development phase, but other nation's have already expressed interest
in
the aircraft, including Australia and some European armed forces..."
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Edited 12/21/01 12:24:17 AM ET by EWING2001
From: EWING2001 Dec-30 1:06 pm
To: ALL (6 of 7)
506.6 in reply to 506.1
A very long, but excellent briefing about tactical and shadow UAVs
(unmanned
vehicles), their operators and sensors you can find at a October 31st
btriefing at
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/contracts.html
UAVs with the Global Hawk technolgy are used in the War in Afghanistan and
confirmed since Mid-October.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
From: EWING2001 Jan-6 10:07 pm
To: ALL (7 of 7)
506.7 in reply to 506.6
I must confess, the Global Hawk theory makes more and more sense for me,
especially if you think of Flight 93:
You might ask, what happened to the fourth plane, Flight 93? According to
one theory, Global Hawk technology malfunctioned on Flight 93. Somehow the
pilots onboard were able to regain control of their aircraft. If Flight 93
lands safely on the ground, the secret of what was really happening on all
four planes would be revealed. A back-up plan had to be implemented.
Flight 93 was then supposedly shot down by a US military jets. There are
verifiable facts to substantiate this possibility. There were a number of
eye witnesses who claimed to have seen flight 93 explode before it fell to
the ground. These eye witnesses also saw a military jet in the sky near
the
crash site. Plus, there were reports of a small white private plane
circling
the crash site immediately after the crash - even though all private
aircraft were supposed to be grounded at the time. Aircraft debris from
Flight 93 was strewn over an area six to eight miles from the crash site,
which would be impossible if, as the government said, some of the
passengers
assaulted the hijackers onboard.
Now comes the hero story from the government. This story is used to supply
all the answers to all the questions about what happened on Flight 93 and
to
avoid any further inquiry by a gullible American public that accepts most
anything their government officials say is truth. As George Bush, Sr. was
quoted as saying: "Don't confuse people with the truth."
Dick Eastman
To: "Dick Eastman" <eas...@compwrx.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 12:57 PM
Subject: Re: WTC Passengers Connected to Global Hawk (Remote Control Flight
Takeover Technology)
> In article <a5j7tq$kb0$1...@nnrp.atgi.net>, you say...
> > Subject: WTC Passengers Connected to Global Hawk
>
> Hey dick, I asked you in the newsgroups, but you have not
> replied, so now I'll ask you in person: why do you post to
> 3 political newsgroups and (soc.culture.netherlands and
> soc.culture.belgium) ? You are off-topic for the latter
> set and you never get any feedback to your stuff from us.
> So, be a good dick and remove us from your headers.
>
> --
> Townkraaier
Dear Kraaier,
OK, are you alt.politics.ec or alt.politics.europe.misc?
I thought the war on terrorism was affecting Europe in several ways
-- anti-terroism restrictions of freedom, Moslem immigration
politics, war possibilities, NATO competence, Oil, relations with
Russia and China -- and the possibility that Britain and the U.S.
are capable of the frameup.
There are many English speaking people in the Netherlands and
Belgium -- and they have no idea how crazy the leading nation
of NATO is unless we tell them.
ANd with my posts most people are too afraid to respond,
but they read them and pass them on -- believe it.
Also, men who give their names and addresses and welcome
responses and respond to all responses should not be driven
out of the forums by men who conceal their identities.
In a world of Spam one wonders why you pick on me,
who writes most of what he posts and stands accountable
for all of it.
Yet despite this difference in viewpoint about freedom of
political speech and appropriateness of topic, I am glad
you took the time to write to me.
Don't you think that 911 wtc was a frame-up?
Don't you think the issue matters to these groups?
Give me one European in each newsgroup who agrees,
then I must conclude that I belong. (I assume that there
are many in each group.)
Don't you want Europeans to learn what Americans things
about the government that causes Europe so much trouble?
It is the nations, it is the people I address, not the languages.
Or else why do Europeans bother to learn English?
With warm regard for all of you, I am
Yours in friendship,
Dick Eastman
Yakima, Washington
Townkraaier
> From: "Townkraaier" <townk...@hotmail.com>
> To: "Dick Eastman" <eas...@compwrx.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 12:57 PM
> Subject: Re: WTC Passengers Connected to Global Hawk (Remote Control Flight
> Takeover Technology)
>
>
> > In article <a5j7tq$kb0$1...@nnrp.atgi.net>, you say...
> > > Subject: WTC Passengers Connected to Global Hawk
> >
> > Hey dick, I asked you in the newsgroups, but you have not
> > replied, so now I'll ask you in person: why do you post to
> > 3 political newsgroups and (soc.culture.netherlands and
> > soc.culture.belgium) ? You are off-topic for the latter
> > set and you never get any feedback to your stuff from us.
> > So, be a good dick and remove us from your headers.
>
Read again. The "latter set" refers to the bracketed two
soc.culture groups. How anyone can understand otherwise
is beyond me.
Why you don't reply in the newsgroups when I post my
reaction to your stuff is also beyond me. That you slam
my personal e-mail to you back into the newsgroups is
downright rude.
> I thought the war on terrorism was affecting Europe in several ways
> -- anti-terroism restrictions of freedom, Moslem immigration
> politics, war possibilities, NATO competence, Oil, relations with
> Russia and China -- and the possibility that Britain and the U.S.
> are capable of the frameup.
Europe, yes. So address some pan-European newsgroup or the
political newsgroups (not the soc.culture ones). Don't single
out two newsgroups where these matters are rarely discussed.
> There are many English speaking people in the Netherlands and
> Belgium -- and they have no idea how crazy the leading nation
> of NATO is unless we tell them.
Yeah, tell me about it. My Dutch passport resides in the USA.
> ANd with my posts most people are too afraid to respond,
> but they read them and pass them on -- believe it.
I would like to hear from anyone in the two soc.culture
groups that Dick addresses if they have "read and passed
his stuff on to others". My guess is that set = null.
> Also, men who give their names and addresses and welcome
> responses and respond to all responses should not be driven
> out of the forums by men who conceal their identities.
Oh crap, just about everyone in both soc.culture groups
know not only my real name. Many of these people know
me in person. How do you even know that I am a man ?
> In a world of Spam one wonders why you pick on me,
> who writes most of what he posts and stands accountable
> for all of it.
Because what you post *is* SPAM in soc.culture groups.
And you are not the only SPAMer I attack. You just don't
read the two soc.culture groups you SPAM in or you
would know...if you know Dutch, that is.
> Yet despite this difference in viewpoint about freedom of
> political speech and appropriateness of topic, I am glad
> you took the time to write to me.
>
> Don't you think that 911 wtc was a frame-up?
I have no idea. I have heard a thousand opinions, but
very little that I can identify for myself as fact. Planes
flew into the WTC buildings. The damage they caused seemed
greater than two planes would cause without other prepwork.
Terrorists were extremely active at the time before 9/11.
Terrorists are often very capable, devious people who may
have planned this over the course of years as the media
indicated. What am I to think ? That Bush and the media
have managed to make terrorist action look like terrorist
action, walk like terrorist action, quack like terrorist
action ? If so, they have done a good job on me. But I
try to just live and not think about it too much. I leave
that to you and friends, hoping that you will keep the
dialog in newsgroups that have *politic* in their names.
> Don't you think the issue matters to these groups?
Correct. Not to the two soc.culture groups. The folks
in these groups who ARE interested also read nl.politics
and be.politics .
> Give me one European in each newsgroup who agrees,
> then I must conclude that I belong. (I assume that there
> are many in each group.)
That is pretty proposterous. By analogy: if there is one
mother in the Dutch breastfeeding newsgroup who is
interested that gives you the right to post off-topic
in that group. Nonsensical, ain't it ?
And I have just told you how you can address all the
people who are interested and still not bother the
people who are not: scan your newsrc file for the
term "politic". You would probably not be off-topic
in any of those groups.
> Don't you want Europeans to learn what Americans things
> about the government that causes Europe so much trouble?
Some of us do, some of us don't. I live in America, so I
don't need to hear it from you. Soc.culture group charters
don't need to hear it from you either. Restrict yourself
to *.politic.* and you'll be in good shape.
> It is the nations, it is the people I address, not the languages.
> Or else why do Europeans bother to learn English?
Not to get badgered by you, dick. I have given you the way
to find your audience. You can reach thousands of people
that way who probably are interested in what you have to
say. Now you are reaching a few hundred who don't care,
and some of whom are pretty annoyed.
I hope you understand that my advice is given in the
spirit of making usenet a better place to be.
> Dick Eastman
--
Townkraaier