NA "barbarian stage of development" justify colonialism? Re: The Hypocrisy and Danger of Anti-China Demonstrations
CharlesLiu
wrote:
> niedziela, 4 maja 2008 18:19. carbon entity 'CharlesLiu'
> <chliu...@hotmail.com> contaminated talk.politics.tibet with the following
> letter:
>
> > The Chinese have too much self-respect to destablize our sovereignty
> > by funding Native American Independence movement.
>
> Do not compare Tibetans to Native Americans. I respect the last one but
> those of Native Americans who live in USA didn't have an ancient country
> with the alphabet and diplomacy which had lasted from the 1st millenium of
> Christian Era. Also, they didn't have neither Tanjur and Kanjur nor another
> book printed in their language in the 14th century.
>
> Tibetans were not on the barbarian stage of development
Let's FW your your claim that NA "barbarian stage of development" to
the NA groups for some feedback...
> before the Chinese
> invasion, quite contrary they actually had one of the longest-living
> civilizations in the world, older even than many Northern European
> countries. They have their own alphabet as a main writing system whereas
> China can't still manage without the Hanzi ideograms.
>
> They have only their Mongolic race and the language leage common to Han, but
> also to Bhutanese, Burmans and Thai people which have their own independent
> countries. The CCP claims to Tibet are no more legitimate than the claim of
> the Qing to Mongolia or the English claim to India.
>
> --
> tois egregorosin hena kai koinon kosmon einai
> ton de koimomenon hekaston eis idion apostrephesthai
Jakub A. Krzewicki
<chli...@hotmail.com> contaminated talk.politics.tibet with the following
letter:
> Let's FW your your claim that NA "barbarian stage of development" to
> the NA groups for some feedback...
I don't claim that NA ar on the low stage of moral development, they just
didn't reach the alphabetic development in the present USA before the Six
Civilized tribes of Sequoyah. Mexico and Peru not included.
I know about a real Polish patriot Sat-Okh who was a half Native American. I
read his books when I was a young boy. Don't think me wrong.
CharlesLiu
wrote:
> niedziela, 4 maja 2008 18:50. carbon entity 'CharlesLiu'
> letter:
>
> > Let's FW your your claim that NA "barbarian stage of development" to
> > the NA groups for some feedback...
>
> I don't claim that NA ar on the low stage of moral development, they just
> didn't reach the alphabetic development in the present USA before the Six
> Civilized tribes of Sequoyah.
Native American's pictograpy/ideagraphy is one of the oldest written
language on earth:
http://www.google.com/search?q=Native+American+writing+pictography+ideography
Jakub A. Krzewicki
<chli...@hotmail.com> contaminated talk.politics.tibet with the following
letter:
> Native American's pictograpy/ideagraphy is one of the oldest written
> language on earth:
>
>
http://www.google.com/search?q=Native+American+writing+pictography+ideography
The hobos have their picture alphabet too. Each and every pictography can be
useful to write a matter-of-the-day letter. But neither of them is such a
good writing system to be useful enough in writing and printing the whole
libraries like the Tibetan alphabetic system.
Even Hanzi system evolved from a pictography to a logographic writing.
tkavanag
"Jakub A. Krzewicki" <ebr...@poczta.onet.pl> wrote in message
news:fvkq5r$bno$3...@news.onet.pl...
> niedziela, 4 maja 2008 18:50. carbon entity 'CharlesLiu'
> <chli...@hotmail.com> contaminated talk.politics.tibet with the following
> letter:
>
<snip>
> they just
> didn't reach the alphabetic development in the present USA before the Six
> Civilized tribes of Sequoyah.
That's *Five* Civilized Tribes, and Sequoyah 's system is a syllabary: the
characters represent syllables not and alphabet.
tk, PhD