Women need to be RAPED, say LIBERALS + KKKerry + Feminazis
Harry Hope
Do soccer moms want LIBERAL judges + Kobe Bryant + O.J.?
Women of the world unite!
LIBERAL Demon-KKK-Rat John KKKerry opposes the death penalty, he
supports rights for dirty muslim terrorists and criminals, and he
promises to appoint LIBERAL judges to the U.S. Supreme Court.
By contrast, President George W. Bush and the Party of Lincoln support
the death penalty and support TOUGH JUDGES who protect women's rights to
be free from rape, murder, assault, battery, and terrorism.
Please protect our sisters, daughters and mothers: vote Bush/Cheney!
islam means "submit"
In islam, women must submit to:
gang rape
stoning
"honor" killings
beheadings
burkhas
4 wives for 1 husband
How dirty muslims rape young girls "Down Under"
Or what happens when Australia banned guns
PROTECT THE 2nd AMENDMENT TO THE U.S. CONSTITUTION!
Janet Albrechtsen. The Australian. 7 July 2002.
THE French call it tournantes or "take your turn" -- the French term for
the pack-rape of white girls by young Muslim men.
For 20 years the French ignored the ethnic causes of these barbaric
crimes for fear of offending multicultural man. Along the way, more
innocent young girls were pack-raped. Xenophobia divided communities.
And finally, voters punished a Centre-Left government for assuming that
the electorate was not grown up enough to discuss race without being
racist.
Last year Sylvie Lotteau, a magistrate from Bobigny, a northern Paris
suburb, described tournantes: "Their technique was to pick up a young
girl -- a white girl -- and once she had become the girlfriend of one of
the members, he would allow his mates to make use of her."
Now it's in Australia. Last week two Muslim brothers were found guilty
of the gang-rape of a young Australian girl. The victim knew one of the
brothers. She was invited for a drive but taken to a secluded park and
gang-raped while 14 Muslim boys watched.
Racially motivated gang-rape first hit the radar screen in August last
year. After the first trial, ethnic leaders such as Sheik Tajedinne
Hamed el Hilaly, imam at Lakemba mosque, said the ethnicity of the
rapists was irrelevant and simply incited racist attacks on Muslims.
But the Muslim community flogged the wrong racists -- those Muslim
rapists played the race card in the most horrific and demeaning way,
taunting victims with "you deserve it because you're Australian" and
threats to "f--- you Leb style".
And when the judge in the first trial, Megan Latham, tried to douse the
flames in an increasingly heated debate about ethnic crime with her
gratuitous comments about there being "no racial element", she simply
turned up the heat.
Since then, evidence on ethnicity-based gang-rapes has mounted. Horrific
attacks across Sydney's southwest reveal the same modus operandi as the
French tournantes. Our reaction? Like the French, we pander to
sensitivities about race and cultural issues. And so we extend the
social and political nightmare of race-based gang-rape.
A year ago the barbaric French phenomenon looked vaguely relevant. Now
it looks scary and prophetic. When 11 young Muslim men were accused of
pack raping a 14-year-old French girl in a cellar, politicians, judges
and sociologists finally began to expose and explore the terror of
tournantes.
"It's the group effect. They can't let themselves down in front of their
friends, who are urging them to commit the act," said a police commander
of a northern Paris suburb.
Pack-rape of white girls is an initiation rite of passage for a small
section of young male Muslim youth, said Jean-Jacques Rassial, a
psychotherapist at Villetaneuse University. "Fraternal bonding now
dominates. It is the law of the gang, shorn of any sexual morals," he
said.
Denmark presents a similar story. Last year, Flemming Balvig, a
criminologist at Copenhagen University, confirmed the French experience
of this barbaric rite of passage into manhood for some of these young
men.
French and Danish experts say perpetrators of gang-rape flounder between
their parents' Islamic values and society's more liberal democratic
values falling back on the most basic pack mentality of violence and
self-gratification. The progressive Danes offer immigrants advice about
the nature of Danish culture and how Denmark's liberal sexual attitudes
cannot be equated with Danish girls "asking for it".
Even the wider Arab world is confronting the costs of a culture that can
treat women as second-class citizens. Two weeks ago a ground-breaking
report by Arab scholars, commissioned by the UN, revealed that half of
all Arab women can neither read nor write. The Arab Human Development
Report 2002 found that Arab women's participation in political and
economic life rates the lowest in the world.
Transplanted to countries such as Australia, a culture which places so
little value on gender equality was always going to have problems when
faced with women who not only read and write but think and assume
control of their lives. Each of those barbaric gang-rapists showed utter
disdain for their young Western victims.
Yet in Australia racially motivated gang-rape is met by gutless
censorship from multicultural man. And like our Muslim leaders,
Australian feminists have been unusually quiet on this gender issue.
Ignoring it exacerbates it. A large group of Muslim boys involved in
these gang-rapes is still at large. The Muslim community's refusal to
acknowledge cultural issues spells disaster for more innocent young
women terrorised by Muslim boys hiding behind their ethnicity. Silence
also spells disaster politically. Suppressing frank discussion gives a
free kick to the next Jean-Marie Le Pen or Pauline Hanson.
At the community level, ignoring the link between crime and ethnicity
raises the red flag to rednecks who wish to blame all Muslims for the
barbarity of a few. This undermines a peaceful, tolerant future for the
vast majority of immigrants who embrace Australian values.
Discussing race or ethnicity is neither racist nor xenophobic. Tackling
problems head on can only encourage further immigration; ignoring them
will be immigration's death knell. Our tolerance of these Muslim
pack-rapists simply feeds their intolerance of us. It took the French 20
years to work that out. How long will it take us?
Miranda Devine. "Racist rapes: Finally the truth comes out." The
Sun-Herald. July 14 2002.
So now we know the facts, straight from the Supreme Court, that a group
of Lebanese Muslim gang rapists from south-western Sydney hunted their
victims on the basis of their ethnicity and subjected them to hours of
degrading, dehumanising torture. The young women, and girls as young as
14, were "sluts" and "Aussie pigs", the rapists said. So now that some
of the perpetrators are in jail, will those people who cried racism and
media "sensationalism" hang their heads in shame? Hardly.
The journalists, academics, legal brains and politicians who tried to
claim last August that the gang rapes of south-western Sydney were just
a run-of-the-mill police blotter story being beaten up by racists,
scaremongers and political opportunists don't ever want to acknowledge
the truth about that ugly episode in Australian history. They don't want
to acknowledge the fear and tension that ran through a part of Sydney
they rarely visit and can never understand.
This newspaper was the first to report the story, which had been common
knowledge in police and media circles, and it has never censored the
race element.
Even last week, with the conviction of two brothers for their part in
the gang rape of Miss D, who was 16 when she was held at gunpoint in a
Greenacre park, there were media outlets that downplayed the story and
air-brushed race from it.
Yet the victims have been crying out for the truth to be told. In court
on Friday, one victim gave another a card on which she had written
In August, when Judge Megan Latham handed out laughably lenient
sentences to three men in one gang rape case, which were later more than
doubled on appeal, she made a special point of debunking the race link:
"There is no evidence before me of any racial element in the commission
of these offences," she said. "There is nothing said or done by the
offenders which provides the slightest basis for imputing to them some
discrimination in terms of the nationality of their victims."
Except that later one of the victims complained her victim impact
statement had been "censored" of any "ethnic" references by prosecutors
intent on a plea bargain. She was convinced she was raped because of her
ethnicity. "You deserve it because you're an Australian," the rapists
told her during the five-hour attack.
It's just so inconvenient of the victims to insist on telling the truth.
"I looked in his eyes. I had never seen such indifference," one
18-year-old victim, codenamed Miss C, told the court, remembering one of
the 14 men who called her "Aussie pig", gang raped her 25 times over a
six-hour period in Bankstown and Chullora, and then turned a hose on
her. "I'm going to f*** you Leb style," he said.
Fourteen gang rapists have been convicted, or pleaded guilty, thanks to
the courage of seven victims who testified for days in court as their
tormentors smirked nearby, the men's families threatened them and
defence lawyers suggested they had enjoyed the rapes.
"They're very brave, very strong and very courageous young women," said
Salvation Army Major Joyce Harmer, who held the hands of many of the
victims through the trials. "They knew this was something they had to
do."
These were racist crimes. They were hate crimes. The rapists chose their
victims on the basis of race. That fact is crucial to this story. If the
perpetrators had been Anglo-Celtic Australians, the furore would have
been enormous. No newspaper would have left out that fact and you can
bet the guilt and shame would have been spread far and wide.
10 Tips to Avoid Being Gang Raped by muslims
Mark Steyn. "Battered Westerner Syndrome inflicted by myopic muslim
defenders." Jewish World Review. 15 Elul, 5762.
Last Thursday, in Sydney, the pack leader of a group of Lebanese Muslim
gang-rapists was sentenced to 55 years in jail. I suppose I ought to say
"Lebanese-Australian" Muslim gang-rapists, since the accused were
Australian citizens. But, identity-wise, the rambunctious young lads
considered themselves heavy on the Lebanese, light on the Australian.
During their gang rapes, the lucky lady would be told she was about to
be "f---ed Leb style" and that she deserved it because she was an
"Australian pig."
But, inevitably, it's the heavy sentence that's "controversial." After
September 11th, Americans were advised to ask themselves, "Why do they
hate us?" Now Australians need to ask themselves, "Why do they rape us?"
As Monroe Reimers put it on the letters page of The Sydney Morning
Herald:
"As terrible as the crime was, we must not confuse justice with revenge.
We need answers. Where has this hatred come from? How have we
contributed to it? Perhaps it's time to take a good hard look at the
racism by exclusion practiced with such a vengeance by our community and
cultural institutions."
...
Mr. Reimers, though, will be happy to know his view is echoed across the
hemispheres. Five days before 9/11, the Norwegian newspaper Dagbladet
reported that 65% of the country's rapes were committed by "non-Western"
immigrants -- a category which, in Norway, is almost wholly Muslim. A
professor at the University of Oslo explained that one reason for the
disproportionate Muslim share of the rape market was that in their
native lands "rape is scarcely punished" because it is generally
believed that "it is women who are responsible for rape."
So Muslim immigrants to Norway should be made aware that things are a
little different in Scandinavia? Not at all! Rather, the professor
insisted, "Norwegian women must take their share of responsibility for
these rapes" because their manner of dress would be regarded by Muslim
men as inappropriate. "Norwegian women must realize that we live in a
multicultural society and adapt themselves to it." Or to modify Queen
Victoria's wedding-night advice to her daughter: Lie back and think of
Yemen.
France? Well, I can't bring you any ethnic rape statistics from the
Fifth Republic because the authorities go to great lengths not to keep
any. But, even though the phenomenon of immigrant gang rape does not
exist, there's already a word for it: the "tournante" -- or "take your
turn." Last year, 11 Muslim men were arrested for enjoying a grand old
tournante with a 14-year old girl in a cellar.
Denmark? "Three quarters of rapes are carried out by non-Danes," says
Peter Skaarup, chairman of the People's Party, a member of the governing
coalition.
When muslims attack ... dirty muslims back Kerry
http://www.aim.org/media_monitor/1816_0_2_0_C/
Cliff Kincaid | July 27, 2004
The prospect of big money being spent abroad could buy some crucial
votes for Kerry here in the U.S.
It wasn't front-page news, but John Kerry got some significant backing
recently. The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) reported that
54 percent of eligible Muslim voters said they would vote for Kerry,
while 26 percent favored Nader. The survey results were covered by
CNSNews.com, UPI wire service, and newspapers as far away as India. But
the major media in the U.S. did not report the results, perhaps because
they are potentially embarrassing to Kerry.
Fifty-five percent of these respondents said they voted for President
Bush in the 2000 election. So why have they bailed on Bush? Why do they
dislike Bush after liberating Afghanistan and Iraq? It would appear that
these American Muslims do not appreciate a U.S. foreign policy of
freedom and democracy in the Middle East. Speakers at the CAIR event to
release the survey included Nader himself, former Iraq Chief of Mission
Edward Peck, as well as representatives from the Muslim Public Affairs
Council and the Council for the National Interest.
Kari Huss of MSNBC did a fascinating story on anti-Bush sentiment in the
Arab-American community. Referring to CAIR's voter registration
campaign, she reported, "To the extent that the get-out-the-Muslim-vote
effort succeeds, it will largely benefit the Democrats because it is
energized by anger over the Bush administration's Patriot Act and what
is perceived as an anti-Muslim bias behind the Iraq war and
Israeli-Palestinian policy."
In April, [ARAB] pollster John Zogby noted that a survey of
Arab-American voters in four critical states--Florida, Michigan, Ohio
and Pennsylvania--found that only 30 percent approved of Bush's job
performance. The same figure would vote for Bush for president, with
Kerry getting 49 percent of the Arab-American vote.
Writing in the Dallas Morning News, William McKenzie said that his
discussions with local Muslims found that, "It doesn't matter that the
president has gone out of his way to say the war against terror is not a
fight against Islam. The battle against terrorism feels that way to this
group." He added, "After an hour of listening, it was no surprise to
learn very few of these registered voters plan to support the President.
The administration could dismiss this as an unscientific group. But
their preferences track an April [ARAB] Zogby poll in the four states
with the greatest Muslim populations."
In a pitch for Muslim votes, it is reported that a draft of the
Democratic Party platform, to be presented at the party's convention,
calls for the development of a new American strategy for "public
diplomacy" in the Arab and Muslim worlds to alleviate distrust of
America. Congressional Democrats backing Kerry have released a 90-page
document that includes a "Marshall Plan" for the Middle East "to create
a middle class and a regional common market," a $10 billion "global
alliance for improving education for Arab children," and a $200 billion
"Renaissance Partnership" for the Arabs in the Middle East. The U.S.
would put up $100 billion for this. The prospect of big money being
spent abroad could buy some crucial votes for Kerry here in the U.S.
Harry Hope
islam means "submit"
In islam, women must submit to:
* muslim gang rape
* muslim stoning
* muslim "honor" killings
* muslim beheadings
* muslim burkhas
4 wives for 1 * muslim husband
Girl, 16, hanged in public in Iran
http://www.iranfocus.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=80
Fri. 20 Aug 2004
On Sunday, August 15, a 16-year-old girl in the town of Neka, northern
Iran, was executed. Ateqeh Sahaleh was hanged in public on Simetry
Street off Rah Ahan Street at the city center.
The sentence was issued by the head of Neka's Justice Department and
subsequently upheld by the mullahs' Supreme Court and carried out with
the approval of Judiciary Chief Mahmoud Shahroudi.
In her summary trial, the teenage victim did not have any lawyer and
efforts by her family to recruit a lawyer was to no avail. Ateqeh
personally defended herself. She told the religious judge, Haji Rezaii,
that he should punish the main perpetrators of moral corruption not the
victims.
The judge personally pursued Ateqeh's death sentence, beyond all normal
procedures and finally gained the approval of the Supreme Court. After
her execution Rezai said her punishment was not execution but he had her
executed for her "sharp tongue."
Buy it now!:
Not Without My Daughter (1991)
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B00005N89Q/
http://www.aim.org/media_monitor/1816_0_2_0_C/
Feminists Silent on Freedom for Iraqi Women by Lisa De Pasquale
http://www.cblpolicyinstitute.org/silenceoniraqiwomen.htm
The transfer of sovereignty to the Iraqi government marks a new day for
Iraqi women. Thanks to the courageous action taken by the Bush
administration and its allies, Iraqi women have renewed freedom. The
administration has insisted that women receive educational and small
business opportunities, as well as active participation in government.
For months radical feminists have been silent on the plight of Iraqi
women. Instead this hypocritical bunch has condemned the war in Iraq and
its subsequent liberation of women simply because the war is supported
by conservatives.
In March feminists gathered in front of the White House to protest
military action against Saddam Hussein. The protest was called "Code
Pink: Women's Pre-Emptive Strike for Peace." On the other side of the
world, Iraqi women were being denied the most basic rights and freedoms.
Iraqi women lived in fear knowing that Iraqi law freely allowed male
relatives to murder them in the name of honor. In Iraqi prisons, women
were raped and tortured for being related to Iraqi opposition activists.
Videotapes of the acts were sent to the families.
Despite obvious human rights violations and limits on freedom,
feminists, led by the National Organization for Women, ignored Saddam
Hussein's reprehensible treatment of women. Under the Saddam Hussein
regime Iraqi women were not allowed to work outside the home. Feminists,
on the other hand, talked about America's "tyrants" and the threat of
"tyranny in our homes, our workplaces and our schools."
Radical feminists witnessed a legitimate case of tyranny and violence
against women in Iraq, but they remained steadfastly against policies
and actions taken by America and the Bush administration that helped
these women. NOW President Kim Gandy stated, "The real terrorism is the
Bush administration's disregard for international law and destruction of
civil liberties at home. This has become an issue of one dictator versus
another."
Feminists are more comfortable allowing Iraqi women to endure torture
than supporting the Bush Administration. For example, a report by
Amnesty International documented the beheading of 50 young women in
Baghdad. The report also said, "The heads of these women were hung on
the doors of their houses for a few days." Saddam's son Uday led the
group of men who beheaded the women and terrorized their families.
The US State Department reports that human rights organizations receive
continuous testimony on the psychological trauma women have suffered
after being tortured and raped by Iraqi military personnel. Despite this
overwhelming evidence, feminists in the US praised Iraq and cited a
suspicious United Nations report that said Iraq "scored highest in
women's empowerment." Before the capture of Saddam, NOW stated in a
press release posted on their website that Iraqi women "currently enjoy
more rights and freedoms than women in other Gulf nations, such as Saudi
Arabia."
At an International Alliance for Justice press conference in 2002, Safia
al-Souhail, an Iraqi woman whose father was murdered for opposing
Saddam, said, "We are here begging the support of the free world to
liberate us from the nightmare we have been living in for the past three
decades." Al-Souhail also said, "Disarmament alone will not end our
suffering. This regime should be indicted for its crimes against
humanity."
NOW and their cohorts were deaf to these women's pleas and still condemn
the war in Iraq. Feminists invent problems in the US and ignore the real
problems faced by women around the world. NOW accuses President Bush of
"reversing women's rights here and abroad." Feminist Majority leader
Eleanor Smeal odiously said that the Bush Administration "needs to
construct a foreign policy as if women mattered."
The deceptively titled March for Women's Lives in April brought
thousands of feminists and leftist supporters to Washington, DC. Rather
than march against the atrocities and violence against women in Iraq and
other countries around the world, feminists waved coat hangers and
demanded taxpayer-funded abortions. Cybill Shepherd held a sign that
said, "Too bad John Ashcroft's mother didn't believe in abortion." Amid
"Fire Bush," "Tarts for Choice" and other placards feminist icon Gloria
Steinem told the crowd, "This government is the greatest danger on
earth!"
Echoing the hateful and hysterical rhetoric, Senator Hillary Clinton,
with no apparent sense of irony regarding the previous administration,
said she was there to criticize President Bush for "not upholding laws
against sexual harassment and discrimination."
These radical feminists' stance on military action in Iraq and the
global war on terrorism illustrate how they have consistently fallen
short of their purported mission to "eliminate sexism and eliminate all
oppression." Their motives are clearly political and not based on
advancing the rights of women around the world. When faced with a war
that liberated the Iraqi people, a majority of whom are women, feminists
would much rather turn a blind eye to the horrors of Saddam than support
America and the Bush Administration.
