Re: Where niggers go, riots follow
RichAsianKid
> http://english.donga.com/data/20091116/photo/2009111604858.jpg
>
> http://media.nzherald.co.nz/webcontent/image/jpg/car_220x14749002.jpg
>
> http://wwwimage.cbsnews.com/images/2009/11/14/image5646706g.jpg
>
> They talk about "equality"?
>
> They talk about "democracy"?
>
> They talk about "minority rights"?
>
> And they imported those niggers into Europe just because they believe
> in all those shits?
>
> See for yourself what niggers will do when they land on your country.
"You can take the jig out of the jungle, you can't take the jungle out
of the jig."
There are times when good intentions just ain't quite good enough.....
See as example this recent anecdote:
Penang
Oh, how I fervently hope that the N. E. Asia will be free from those
dark skinned creatures.
Will Japan, Korea and China do that?
Gods and Monkeys
Gods and Monkeys
>
> - Show quoted text -
Korea and Japan have little societal tolerance for blacks. Antibodies
will form if niggers get too numerous. Blacks to their credit know
these things.
Blacks don't take to Asian culture either, in large numbers. It's too
subtle for them.
And you shouldn't blame blacks for this. They have their good side
too. A good
side that gets mangled in the Eurasian context.
The Jew media propaganda tries to paint a different picture.
BTW, the Jews do take a pounding for their media manipulations.
That's one reason why they always cluster in the largest cities.
They are openly hated outside of them.
Niggers can't even get a foothold in criminal activities in E.Asia.
Controlled by gangs, yakuza, triads. Whites are trying to foothold
in E.Asia and blacks are sure to coattail. But whites are a dying
population. Maybe a non-issue.
RichAsianKid
Think of it this way: if Japan, Korea, China (and Taiwan) remain inert
and don't do anything, status quo remains. But *even if* America and
many parts of Europe were to do something today they're still going to
sunk for a reason known as (and ironically named) "demographic
momentum": as of 2011, half of babies born to US population will be
non-white, and these third world populations traditionally have had way
higher birth rates. And all you need to do is to sit back and see how
this birth cohort wreaks havoc the next generation.
Prevention trumps cure.
Gods and Monkeys
>
> - Show quoted text -
No. You overstate "third world" damage to white populations.
Firstly, we need to get rid of this "first world vs. third world"
rhetoric. Whites, esp. WASPs and Jews are not and never have been
"first world". Esp. the Jews. The Jews have lived in "hell world"
with pinhole looks at what they perceive and WASP "first world".
And whites they didn't even conquer any peoples or lands. What they
did was construct over people and kill the natives. They never
led them (as real conquerors do). Neither did they ever
incorporate any of the cultures of the peoples they destroyed
(as real conquerors do). What whites did and still do is
create a shit load of vanity and convenience projects, founded
upon cheesy (self glorified) technical innovations. Transform white
female vanity into practical laws. Turn busy-bodiedness into a virtue.
Take
a fanatical, insane religion and make it seem common sensical
and acceptable. And they've never truly experienced the lands they've
stolen. They've divied them up, build over them, overmanaged
themselves
right out of ever truly experiencing the lands they stole. And they
killed the
animal life and destroyed the ecologies that made the lands what they
were.
The "third-world" of new peoples into America, represent a "fresh
start".
Gods and Monkeys
staten
Change for Muslims. Niggers are out of fashion.
> start".- Hide quoted text -
RichAsianKid
I hate to put you on the spot, Gods and Monkeys, as there are times when
you do speak sense. But in the context of this thread can you please
tell us concrete specific reasons why anyone would want more blacks and
browns who are in all probability collectively associated with higher
crime rates, higher welfare dependency, lower scholastic and economic
achievement etc etc etc flooding, say, Busan or Incheon? Why is that a
desirable outcome for Korea?
RichAsianKid
I hate to put you on the spot, Gods and Monkeys, as there are times when
you do speak sense. But in the context of this thread can you please
tell us concrete specific reasons why anyone would want more blacks and
browns (who are in all probability collectively associated with higher
crime rates, higher welfare dependency, lower scholastic and economic
achievement etc etc) flooding, say, Busan or Incheon? Why is that a
desirable outcome for Korea? (or Israel)?
Gods and Monkeys
> Gods and Monkeys wrote:
>
> I hate to put you on the spot, Gods and Monkeys, as there are times when
> you do speak sense. But in the context of this thread can you please
> tell us concrete specific reasons why anyone would want more blacks and
> browns who are in all probability collectively associated with higher
> crime rates, higher welfare dependency, lower scholastic and economic
> achievement etc etc etc flooding, say, Busan or Incheon? Why is that a
> desirable outcome for Korea?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
In Korea, blacks simply could not survive as a class. Koreans are
competitive
enough to butcher themselves, minimal free riding there. Also, blacks
couldn't
compete academically. Blacks have a hard enough time in the US with
current
math, science, language curriculum. What chance do they have under a
sped
up Korean system?
Mexicans wouldn't do any better, but there is a Mongoloid connection
there.
One that is reckless cruel, and probably disastrous to ignore. And as
I've pointed out to you
before, neither Mexicans, blacks, and indigenous populations have the
base hostility toward
Asians as they do against white people. Up to now, we've given them no
reason to like us either.
But you see the beginnings of things in California. A rising Asian
elite, this elite needs to
begin to bring up not the entire Mexican population at once (that is
impossible right now),
but it does need to identify individual Mexicans (esp. indigenous
background) that can break through.
And, at the very least Asian men could have an easier time getting
laid with some gorgeous
Mexican women and creating higher IQ children. And get some leg up on
sex games (for a change)
with our bitchier Asian women and dick-led white men. You'd want that
wouldn't you? You couldn't
possibly have a problem with this agenda.
RichAsianKid
There are lots of points here to be made so let's make them chronologically:
(1a) Korea vs Africa on 2003 TIMSS Grade 8:
(Two standard deviations above and below the mean are criteria for
giftedness and mental retardation respectively....)
(1b) If Korea imports more blacks, why will it not be saddled with an
unsolvable social problem - and potentially for generations to come - my
original point?
(2) Yes, human phylogeny is *fundamentally* divided between subsaharan
African vs non-subsaharan African. That is (and for those other posters
reading this) the world is not Asian vs non-Asian, European vs
non-European, let alone gentile versus Jews, muslims vs hindus, etc etc.
Fundamental chasm is that between African vs non-African.
(3) "Nationalism" and "Economism" do not necessarily conflict. In fact
they may well be complementary. Think Japanese (or even....Jewish!!)
society. No sir, it's only situations when human capital do not exactly
coincide with economic imperatives when you have to weigh cost and
benefits - modern multicultural America, Malaysia, India etc.
(4) Universalism and utopianism are ever-so psychologically tempting.
Yet history suggests without backup of economic and military might, good
intentions just ain't quite enough. Wisdom and proverbs tell us that
it's the path to hell that's laid with good intentions; and it's that
road of denial that leads to the precipice of destruction.
(5) Why import Mexican *families* on welfare (or allow them to traipse
in) when you can follow examples of Asia where you only hire foreign
female maids who work? What are the exact benefits of importing sexual
competitors anyway?
Gods and Monkeys
> Gods and Monkeys wrote:
> > On Nov 18, 5:37 pm, RichAsianKid <RichAsian...@hotmail.com> wrote:
I got it. I understand what you are posting. My point is this, the IQ
battle has been won. It's over, done with. It's like saying evolution
trumped creationism. That Einstein trumped Newton. There will
be deniers, but the deniers don't matter. THE GAME has moved
on without the losers. But there are so many other important and fun
games out there. Why hide in a shell? Why do the Chinese
want to hide in a shell? It's too late for that too. You can't
use IQ for China to withdraw like a 40 year old woman who goes
to night clubs and still wants to defend her virginity.
RichAsianKid
Huh? Is the battle won??? You yourself doubted that yourself - didn't
you say in roundabout way blacks are now getting an upper hand on whites
or at the very least how this cyclical historical cycle recurs or
something like that? Or more concretely think just this as example - on
high IQ Koreans no less - and which btw appears stupendously stupid to
Japanese or Chinese - how is it possible so many are Christians - and
even if a tiny minority succumbed to dogmatic Christianity shaming their
Korean nation by proselytizing in (gasp!) Afghanistan (!!) --- so much
so in 2007 that a 20 odd evangelical group had to be supposedly bailed
by the Korean government for what, $10 million???? (I'm sure you can
provide the links for concrete reference)
Or more simply how many parents can accept their own children are more
stupid than their neighbors'? Really?
Now extrapolate the Christian equivalent in America in broader context
to the secular - and think deeper - think of that blind religious
adherence to equality or even democracy - in spite of evidence, in spite
of history.
Yes it's very entertaining havocs of society. It's more than just
whites vs blacks btw where Asians sit on the side-line. Listen to the
first few minutes here (I didn't listen more and I'm guilty sorry) but
also on Jews vs Christians on this talkshow:
http://libertynewsradio.com/shows/tpc/tpc20091114c.mp3
Greatest entertainment on earth?
Maybe.
But still that's the point: aren't you glad Korea ain't 'blessed' by
this diversity??
And at the very least: why complicate any social problem by magnifying
local imperfections????
Gods and Monkeys
Christianity gives a simple ritualized language of interaction that
is international in scope. It's too bad it's an ugly primitive
one but people generally are ugly and primitive. What you
gonna do about it? Credit Koreans for taking advantage
of it at least as much it takes advantage of them.
Never said Korea or China should open their borders. I don't
think they could if they tried. It's a fluke of geography.
NE Asia never had to interact with Africa because of
the caucasian "curtain". But now we now what niggers are like.
No one is gonna force Asians to integrate with niggers.
rst0wxyz
This shows how racists Chinese people are!!!
Gods and Monkeys
>
> - Show quoted text -
Like Johnny Cochran said:
It ain't racist if there's a basis.
Repeat after me:
It ain't racist if there's a basis.
It ain't racist if there's a basis.
rst9
Yeah, Chinese people are racist, not only against blacks, but also
against other non-Chinese.
Gods and Monkeys
>
> - Show quoted text -
Who cares.
rst9
I care!!
Gods and Monkeys
Nobody cares that you care.
Don't get a big head about yourself or about China.
While China is rising, the Chinese race and person is still very low
on the totem pole. Sorry.
RichAsianKid
How do Koreans practically take advantage of Christianity....do Jews
"take advantage" of Christianity? Well?
Then give me some good practical reason why Koreans should be Christian,
e.g. say siphoning brighter children into Christian schools where they
will get a better education and yet will somehow be eventually molested
etc and its still a good deal then maybe I'll believe you etc.
No, it's this sort of gullibility what even higher IQ populations Asians
exhibit - why would you or anyone think they won't follow the even more
stupid gentile whites' model of eventually opening up the borders? What
makes you think that? Why underestimate your adversary? Even America
says eternal vigilance is the price of liberty. And even animals are
capable of great strengths humans can't accomplish.
Why succumb to universalism.
And why succumb to Christianity?
RichAsianKid
"Racism" is China's strength.
RichAsianKid
Why expect anyone to love their own grandchildren only as much as that
of some strangers'?
http://richasiankid.blogspot.com/2008/07/ethnocentrism-is-normal-natural-and.html
Gods and Monkeys
> Gods and Monkeys wrote:
> > On Nov 21, 10:44 pm, RichAsianKid <RichAsian...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> Gods and Monkeys wrote:
>
> >> But still that's the point: aren't you glad Korea ain't 'blessed' by
> >> this diversity??
>
> >> And at the very least: why complicate any social problem by magnifying
> >> local imperfections????
>
> > Christianity gives a simple ritualized language of interaction that
> > is international in scope. It's too bad it's an ugly primitive
> > one but people generally are ugly and primitive. What you
> > gonna do about it? Credit Koreans for taking advantage
> > of it at least as much it takes advantage of them.
>
> > Never said Korea or China should open their borders. I don't
> > think they could if they tried. It's a fluke of geography.
> > NE Asia never had to interact with Africa because of
> > the caucasian "curtain". But now we now what niggers are like.
> > No one is gonna force Asians to integrate with niggers.
>
> How do Koreans practically take advantage of Christianity....do Jews
> "take advantage" of Christianity? Well?
Money, power, opportunity, the benefits of the network. Christians
have
it. Buddhists, Taoists, Muslims, atheists, Confucians, communists,
don't. Korean Christians tend to be wealthier that Korean Buddhists.
You obviously don't know much about Korean Christianity. It's an
evolving thing too. As Korea's gotten wealthier, the screaming form
of Christianity has been disappearing. Also Korean's can switch
between religions very easily. The Christian grip on Korea is
fairly well balanced out.
> Why succumb to universalism.
But some things are universal. Even if you took the extreme and
preposterous position that the races share nothing in
common, you can still say the speed of light is constant in
any place, the earth is round, 2+2=4. There is an endless
list of common "things" discovered and undiscovered.
Now if a person is a lump of shit,
or an entire race is a lump of shits, then these things
don't matter. But the race that actually cares about these
things is going to "win" in the long run. At least that has
been the trend the last 10,000 years. And that's a long
trend line.
rst9
Me? Getting a big head about China? Don't be ridiculous. I have
always considered Arizona my "home".
> While China is rising, the Chinese race and person is still very low
> on the totem pole. Sorry.
I can see why, with people like you, abianchen and RAT,...
Wait a minute, abianchen is NOT Chinese. Sorry, my mistake.
RichAsianKid
Why did you glaringly neglect to mention Judaism, as it goes back to the
point above?
>
> You obviously don't know much about Korean Christianity. It's an
> evolving thing too. As Korea's gotten wealthier, the screaming form
> of Christianity has been disappearing. Also Korean's can switch
> between religions very easily. The Christian grip on Korea is
> fairly well balanced out.
>
>> Why succumb to universalism.
>
> But some things are universal. Even if you took the extreme and
> preposterous position that the races share nothing in
> common, you can still say the speed of light is constant in
> any place, the earth is round, 2+2=4. There is an endless
> list of common "things" discovered and undiscovered.
> Now if a person is a lump of shit,
> or an entire race is a lump of shits, then these things
> don't matter. But the race that actually cares about these
> things is going to "win" in the long run. At least that has
> been the trend the last 10,000 years. And that's a long
> trend line.
>
Wow, even RichAsianKid caught you doing a 180 here - talking about
reality and truth, things which can be empirically falsified, i.e.
PRECISELY what's opposite of religion, let alone deep deep Christianity
concepts like some virgin birth or resurrection from the dead. If 2+2=4
can be easily verified and *reproducible*, that's no longer religion;
they're already science, they're verifiable facts, if not truth itself.
OTOH religion is precisely assertions which cannot be falsified by
evidence - no matter how hard you try - in fact the harder you try the
more a heretic you then become. Knowledge and 'discoveries' which you
alluded to IS their enemy. The more you know, the more you fear.
Same foot modern "equality" is standing on. It's only true not because
of evidence, but in spite of evidence.
Gods and Monkeys
Modern capitalist/science/technological society is the enemy of blacks
as leading agents. This is true. Rarest of things to find a brilliant
black
scientist or technological agent, creative computer programmer. High
analytical, huge information processing jobs - not possible
for very high percentage of blacks.
The thing you don't appreciate, and this comes from living in China,
is that post-modern, global tech society is amazingly fluid. And
actually
a friend to the niggers.
Here's why. While the niggers themselves don't, can't change in
analytical, verbal thinking
(pride of the crackers), it turns out that global society is fluid
enough that
niggers can find a lot of spaces to operate. Security guards, police,
inner city teachers, entertainers, musicians, actors, athletes,
governmental
jobs, bus drivers, low level entrepreneurs. It turns out that all
equatorial
peoples are not that different in IQ anyway. Blacks, browns, even
thais, indonesians,
philipinos may be a fellow seekers in global capitalism. Economic
niche competitors,
but political allies, and fundamentally anti-capitalist.
Gods and Monkeys
Don't get fishy. You smell like a rotting fish, ole Yella.
>
> > While China is rising, the Chinese race and person is still very low
> > on the totem pole. Sorry.
>
> I can see why, with people like you, abianchen and RAT,...
> Wait a minute, abianchen is NOT Chinese.
I'm not Chinese, either. You getting senile, ole Yella. I've made
this point many times.
RichAsianKid
Now substitute every 'black' with 'Jew' above - will you still come to
the same conclusion?
Just asking....
rst9
You don't your geography, do you? Arizona's all desert, no fish, no
gods but all monkeys.
>
>
>
> > > While China is rising, the Chinese race and person is still very low
> > > on the totem pole. Sorry.
>
> > I can see why, with people like you, abianchen and RAT,...
> > Wait a minute, abianchen is NOT Chinese.
>
> I'm not Chinese, either. You getting senile, ole Yella. I've made
> this point many times.
Well, then you don't know what the hell you are talking about. What
the hell are you doing here?
RichAsianKid
Here's how China effectively deals with Christianity:
Fact is, a lot of religions (and not Christianity per se) when taken to
the extreme can be extremely corrosive. It leads to ideological thinking
(what, you can't abort a child who is deformed and has Down's syndrome;
what, you can't do stem-cell research?) and when huge chunks of society
believe in a falsehood it throttles society and plunges it into the dark
ages. The only value it has is as a mechanism for mass-mobilization and
group cohesion, i.e. as an evolutionary strategy. It also gives stupid
people hard and fast rules of what to do and what not to do, i.e. treat
them as children with an imaginary father ("thou shall not steal!" "thou
shall not commit adultery!!") etc., as well as escape (a.k.a. false hope
during times of tragedy).
RichAsianKid
RichAsianKid
Should mention one more thing. From a Darwinian viewpoint blacks with
their high birth rates and population explosion are actually winners in
the Darwinian game at least for the early 21st century. Don't forget one
thing - ultimately it is survival and reproduction that counts, and not
merit, not IQ, and not even wealth. Modern society has enabled
conditions where even the unfit can survive and propagate, while the
upper classes (especially upper class women) throttle society by
pursuing their dream career, oh say being a cardiac transplant surgeon
or making partner to Wall Street's top law firm.
Now, males and females are different; males have been evolutionarily
fine-tuned towards mating effort; females towards paternal provisioning.
Society by telling women are equal to men misguides women into
resource-seeking ($-making) which really is the male MO for mating
effort. And yet men are not attracted to rich women - they're attracted
to fecund (i.e. young) women way more than to their resources. (A ugly
bald rich guy getting his trophy wife half his age is way more common
than a handsome young guy getting turned on by a post-menopausal hag)
And by the time women make up it's too late: they're past their
reproductive years. And in spite of alternative reproductive strategies
which marginally mitigates things, the end result is still disaster not
just for the individual, but for society.
Nature still exacts its revenge.
Gods and Monkeys
> Gods and Monkeys wrote:
>
> Nature still exacts its revenge.-
Black IQ in Africa averages around 70 in most Sub-Saharan
countries. Eye-popping figure, then you think about it. It
makes sense. No writing system, no cement, clan organization,
life lived in ecosystem. Gene flow lockdown for 100k years.
No new genes coming in. Only out.
American blacks average 85. This isn't due to mixing with
whites. The white percentage of black populations is estimated
to be 20%. This raises some extremely interesting points.
It's clear that a 30 point difference in IQ leads to social
communication/relational problems that can't be overcome.
Imagine an 12th grader being forced to take a 9th grader
to all his social events.
What's occurred in the evolution of white/black relations
in western countries is closer of the gap between blacks
and whites. By blacks. Now the seperation is something
like 12 graders mixing with 10 graders and 11th graders.
What has happened that blacks have closed the gap so?
Under hard slave/capitalistic system, apparently blacks of 70 IQ
could not survive or procreate. And such blacks certainly
couldn't have been much use, even on the plantation.
Selection in the western countries seems to have increased
black IQ. If is all due to culture, then the Chinese in
Africa may have an opportunity to see if this is true.
Black IQ at 70 is intolerable to Eurasian societies.
Black IQ at 85 is acceptable, even competitive
with India, S.E. Asian Countries, Latin America.
Gods and Monkeys
>
> ages. The only value it has is as a mechanism for mass-mobilization and
> group cohesion, i.e. as an evolutionary strategy.
It does have a value beyond "evolutionary strategy". It organizes,
prioritizes fantasy life
at the societal level. It says the fantasy of kidnapping and raping
the hottest girl
in school is punishable in hell. It says living in a fantasy world by
yourself, without
church license is wrong. As humans are fantasizing creatures, living
in a free network
with other creatures, you might want a good, strong fantasy organizing
principle. One
the helps the group internally and externally. Christianity is
primitive, but effective. Especially
for white people, although it is getting less useful by the day. Korea
manages Christianity
acceptably well. Ideally it shouldn't have it, but no country operates
in ideal situations.
Doesn't let it get out of control. Manages it better than the US does,
certainly.
Penang
It's the elitism at work.
I am very familiar with the Koreans. My ex is a Korean :)
>
> You obviously don't know much about Korean Christianity. It's an
> evolving thing too. As Korea's gotten wealthier, the screaming form
> of Christianity has been disappearing. Also Korean's can switch
> between religions very easily. The Christian grip on Korea is
> fairly well balanced out.
For some, yes. Christianity is a tool.
But for others, especially those who fell easy prey to the cult
movements (the moonies, for example), Christianity has become a curse.
>
> > Why succumb to universalism.
>
> But some things are universal. Even if you took the extreme and
> preposterous position that the races share nothing in
> common, you can still say the speed of light is constant in
> any place, the earth is round, 2+2=4. There is an endless
> list of common "things" discovered and undiscovered.
> Now if a person is a lump of shit,
> or an entire race is a lump of shits, then these things
> don't matter. But the race that actually cares about these
> things is going to "win" in the long run. At least that has
> been the trend the last 10,000 years. And that's a long
> trend line.
Hmm... yeah, 2 + 2 = 4, but would Jesus ever return, as He has
promised?
Penang
I often wonder what's the reason you spend so much time in SOC.
1. You don't write Chinese.
2. You don't read Chinese.
3. You don't speak Chinese.
4. You ain't a Chinese.
5. Your home is in Arizona.
Hmm....
No, please don't take it personally. A lot of other shits are here
too, like that old journalist who like to kiss that lama's ass so
badly. :)
report2009
Chinese they are handicapped in SCC but they still want to be here to
feel like home because they don’t feel fit in soc.culture.usa or
soc.culture.canada. Sad, isn’t it?
Glad we can read/write/speak Chinese. I am even in a better position I
have ROC passport I can go back to my Taiwan or my China anytime as
Chinese citizen if I want to. Hehe!
> > Wait a minute, abianchen is NOT Chinese. Sorry, my mistake.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
RichAsianKid
Isn't Islam an even more "effective" religion in the sense it is a very
powerful imperialistic machine re: ingroup vs outgroup?
Also think of how closely Islam aligns with Darwinist principles - just
witness the birth rates of Muslim vs Christian countries.
Likewise with the Old Testament/Judaism vs the New.
As for organizing society, this whole modern religious concept of
"equality" falls within that realm -- especially in multiracial
societies. Again, true to the stupid, false to the wise, useful for the
elite. Even those who most ardently preach equality may not necessarily
believe so themselves.
RichAsianKid
But by your logic then you would also expect the black-white gap in
America to increase in the future because of an ever-expanding welfare
state where selection pressures have since been effectively removed.
In fact there is no closing of the gap in the SAT** (which is a very
good surrogate IQ test) and might have even gone up as posted before -
consistent with the imbalance between black welfare participation and
average fertility rates vs those of whites/Asians.
In other words, if what you said above is true, what was done can also
be undone.
** for reference:
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.indian/msg/1457225129bcd421?hl=en&
Gods and Monkeys
Welfare hasn't increased in the US as percentage of budget.
There must be an IQ floor for a population to exist in tech society
like US.
85 might be it. Too much below and you have too many distributed near
70 that can't even reproduce.
>
> In fact there is no closing of the gap in the SAT** (which is a very
> good surrogate IQ test) and might have even gone up as posted before -
> consistent with the imbalance between black welfare participation and
> average fertility rates vs those of whites/Asians.
>
> In other words, if what you said above is true, what was done can also
> be undone.
>
Don't think it can be undone. All non-African countries seem to have
at least
IQ of 80-85. These countries all have had extensive historical
contact with Eurasian landmass. So 80-85 looks like basement IQ for
population.
It's inconsequential (unless you value IQ for its own sake) that
American
blacks close the gap with whites. Only idiots cry over the difference.
RichAsianKid
Note I said welfare state, not welfare per se, e.g. public ed,
healthcare etc are forms of welfare writ large, as well as many
government programs.
Your second point is correct - witness Australian aborigines whose IQs
are even lower than Africans'.
And the fact American blacks are able to make so much political noise
about equality and make claims to society in general already implies
that link. Very correct. Few people wonder or ponder whether high school
education is even a priority for Zulus or Bushmen let alone having them
adapt or adopt to modern technology or send the next man to space.
>
>> In fact there is no closing of the gap in the SAT** (which is a very
>> good surrogate IQ test) and might have even gone up as posted before -
>> consistent with the imbalance between black welfare participation and
>> average fertility rates vs those of whites/Asians.
>>
>> In other words, if what you said above is true, what was done can also
>> be undone.
>>
>
> Don't think it can be undone. All non-African countries seem to have
> at least
> IQ of 80-85. These countries all have had extensive historical
> contact with Eurasian landmass. So 80-85 looks like basement IQ for
> population.
>
> It's inconsequential (unless you value IQ for its own sake) that
> American
> blacks close the gap with whites. Only idiots cry over the difference.
>
>
>
Closing the gap is not important and idiotic Gods and Monkeys? That's
the purported and perennial national obsession of the US!! You don't
hear much about narrowing the gap between Asians (and yes, Jews) and
whites or blacks do you? It's always about whites and blacks. Soon it
will be whites and Hispanics too, but that's side point.
Why is equality not enough? Because it's always about struggle, not
utopia, not kumbaya. That is, on a deeper note (or on a more superficial
note in terms of college admissions where rank counts more than absolute
score) status is defined by the relative. Why is this important? In at
least one way: sexual selection and female choice.
Old adage (not to repeat myself again) is millennial: when farmer asks
genie what he wishes for with the condition that his village neighbors
get double: farmer replies he wants half his crops destroyed.
And in this mano-a-mano war against nature, even almighty America can't win.
Gods and Monkeys
US welfare as percentage of budget is significantly less now than 10,
20, 30 years ago.
What's changed is a more multi-culti liberal politics (but not
economics, which is as
competitive as ever). Let's stay with the plot.
> Closing the gap is not important and idiotic Gods and Monkeys? That's
> the purported and perennial national obsession of the US!!
No. Closing the IQ gap is NOT an obsession of the US. It's the
"performance
gap" which is the obsession. And most of this is lip service.
The lip service is the political driver. The economics driver is more
influential. Not only
because people want money, but the mechanisms of economics are hidden
and unpredictable. So politics follows the economic movement, doesn't
lead it.
If blacks can find economic sustainability at 85, no one's gonna force
them
off that number. Blacks are the most self-satisfied, self-esteeming
race on the
planet as it is. Psych surveys show this. Only idiots see the black IQ
situation
as a "problem" to be solved.
Penang
Before you go on how America is great, why don't you look at who made
up the majority of those getting the welfare?
Whites or blacks?
Why should the White (and Yellow) works to feed those Black (and
Brown) ??
Why ????
Gods and Monkeys
> Yo G&M !
>
> Before you go on how America is great, why don't you look at who made
> up the majority of those getting the welfare?
>
> Whites or blacks?
>
> Why should the White (and Yellow) works to feed those Black (and
> Brown) ??
>
> Why ????
>
Why is this an issue for you? You live in Malaysia.
Blacks are hell. Africa is hell. What little joy they get
in life is parasiticism off white people. But white people
are hell too. So who gives a shit!
Penang
No, I ain't give a shit, but you should !
After all, you still live in U. S. of A.
Not me !
I ain't paying my taxes for them niggers no more, but you ARE !!
RichAsianKid
But then let's also put things in East Asian perspective. The key to the
riddle here on "multi-culti liberal politics" and ideology is this. We
know from the animal kingdom from our biological heritage that (1)
repeated acts of (2) unreciprocated altruism towards (3) non-kin are
exceedingly rare. You can have 2/3, but you rarely rarely have 3/3
because that will be weeded out pretty very quickly by ruthless
Darwinian sieving. (1)+(3) is simply business, (1)+(2) is family
(deserved or not) and (2)+(3) is what's the media often amusingly touts
as social responsibility. But (1)+(2)+(3)? Possible and documented for
sure, but that's again very rare throughout history.
What am I telling you this? It goes back to this utopian notion of
somehow changing human nature. Multi-culti and racial differences is not
just another issue like welfare policy, such as welfare, or health care,
or gun-control, or even abortion and even even economics in a collective
sense. It goes back far far far in time and way deeper through our
evolutionary life history. Go visit the Smithsonian if you're not
convinced (though they will never cue you in on modern practical
implications of course). Even religion is no match for our divergent
ancestry aka racial differences. (Afterall the Jews/Christian/Muslim
split are at best a few thousand years old if that.) Yet just look at
the havoc that it has already wreaked!!
No, this multiracial gap and chasm of racial ancestry goes back way way
way deeper and way way way back further in our hominid heritage - even
when compared to "you're either for or against me" religion. It would be
(1) foolish to ignore it and pretends it doesn't exist; and (2) imagine
how mere social engineering over a few decades can - let alone should -
overcome it.
>
>> Closing the gap is not important and idiotic Gods and Monkeys? That's
>> the purported and perennial national obsession of the US!!
>
> No. Closing the IQ gap is NOT an obsession of the US. It's the
> "performance
> gap" which is the obsession. And most of this is lip service.
>
> The lip service is the political driver. The economics driver is more
> influential. Not only
> because people want money, but the mechanisms of economics are hidden
> and unpredictable. So politics follows the economic movement, doesn't
> lead it.
>
> If blacks can find economic sustainability at 85, no one's gonna force
> them
> off that number. Blacks are the most self-satisfied, self-esteeming
> race on the
> planet as it is. Psych surveys show this. Only idiots see the black IQ
> situation
> as a "problem" to be solved.
If what you said is true and once again you do make sense, it is
actually not so much blacks who are fundamentally at fault - it's white
(Jewish?) liberals who should shoulder the blame. Afterall as I've said
elsewhere if you deliberately leave your front door unlocked and then
some guy comes in and steals your 72" plasma TV - hey, that burglar
doesn't deserve exclusive blame. Similar when you knowingly go out in
the cold and rain unprotected and then get pneumonia.
No, blacks probably are quite content or at least not anxious, happily
passive, and behaving like most low IQ people in general. Live and let
live. The problem is some utopian agents come in strip-teasing their
ambitions by promoting the falsehood of equality and by implication,
hey, you can be everything you want to be, and guess what, since you're
not, society has so wronged you.
Cruel and manipulative no?
So you're absolutely right on this one.
Then the point I am making is still this: the type of politics described
here will NOT exist if society is homogeneous, as in Korea, Japan,
Iceland, and to a lesser extent, China, Taiwan. It doesn't mean they
have no problems of course. But this whole idea of racial and ethnic
diversity *especially* when combined with the idealistic American idea
of self-determination (as reified by democracy) seems like one surefire
recipe for downstream disunity and discord. Why, afterall, is "racism"
still such a burning so strong? It's merely code-word for racial conflict.
Gods and Monkeys
> still such a burning so strong? It's merely code-word for racial conflict.-
The niggers occupy a low, but stable economic niche in the US. As
long as tech society requires more information, more stimulation,
whites will continue to demographically demise. Blacks will fill in
many roles. Whites crucified by the crucifix of their own making.
But it does take others to put the nail in. The question is, will
others take that step?
Will they want to take that step? Niggers have nearly uniformly
pushed for white disempowerment up to now, with great success.
Will they continue to push for white destruction? This
matters because we live in a global world now. China can't isolate
herself any longer.
Here's the progress of niggerdom.
I see the nigger voice getting louder, more numerous,
and even smarter. It's the people the world underestimates, that
make the greatest strides. Niggerdom is pulling itself up, with all
the moral authority of a conquered race, in harmony
with nature LOL, moving from unconscious to conscious, with
scores to settle, oh so fucking many scores to settle, God-damn
so many fucking many scores to settle. Niggers fuck white women &
Asian
women, make whores of them. Build alliances, interbreed. Do the he
kinds
of shit women love. The whoreing, the music-making, the dancing, the
drum beating. I repeat, the shit that women LOVE, the shit that women
HUMP. Niggerdom is on the rise.
Penang
> On Dec 2, 11:36 pm, RichAsianKid <RichAsian...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Gods and Monkeys wrote:
> > Then the point I am making is still this: the type of politics described
> > here will NOT exist if society is homogeneous, as in Korea, Japan,
> > Iceland, and to a lesser extent, China, Taiwan. It doesn't mean they
> > have no problems of course. But this whole idea of racial and ethnic
> > diversity *especially* when combined with the idealistic American idea
> > of self-determination (as reified by democracy) seems like one surefire
> > recipe for downstream disunity and discord. Why, afterall, is "racism"
> > still such a burning so strong? It's merely code-word for racial conflict.-
>
> The niggers occupy a low, but stable economic niche in the US. As
> long as tech society requires more information, more stimulation,
> whites will continue to demographically demise. Blacks will fill in
> many roles. Whites crucified by the crucifix of their own making.
> But it does take others to put the nail in. The question is, will
> others take that step?
1. There is no "stability" anywhere.
Change is constant.
2. Nigger's "niche" isn't a niche. It's simply a stop-gap-measure.
Once the society progress enough, those low IQ and the mental case sub-
humans will be forever de-linked from the mainstream.
Kumbaya can only go so far.
The "Equality" slogan, the "Egalitarian" concept can only go so far
before they all run out of steam.
The wheel of progression for human society never stops for losers.
The "Red Indians" of the Americas were / are losers.
So are the Tibetans, the Africans and the Liberals.
There are 3 winners in this race, so far.
The North East Asians, who never stop using their brains in adapting
to new chances.
The Caucasians (of the non-Liberal type), who never slow down their
pace in opening up the new frontiers.
And ... the Muslims, who never stop fucking and producing offsprings.
Gods and Monkeys
> On Dec 4, 4:23 am, Gods and Monkeys <yeonsand...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 1. There is no "stability" anywhere.
>
> Change is constant.
>
Sure. But you only need a stable situation to get you to the next
revolution.
Niggers are the longest, oldest race, most ancient motherfuckers on
Earth.
Crackers can't escape them! They had an industrial, tech, space
revolution
to try, and the niggers are still up their asses! Amazing, ain't it?
> 2. Nigger's "niche" isn't a niche. It's simply a stop-gap-measure.
>
> Once the society progress enough, those low IQ and the mental case sub-
> humans will be forever de-linked from the mainstream.
>
> Kumbaya can only go so far.
It's not just kumbaya. There's something very deep here. Women's need
to
suckle and nuture growing things for one! Also a patrician behavior
inducing IQ stratification
of roughly one standard deviation difference between North and South
populations.
Black America is on-board, like it or not.
>
>
> There are 3 winners in this race, so far.
>
> The North East Asians, who never stop using their brains in adapting
> to new chances.
>
> The Caucasians (of the non-Liberal type), who never slow down their
> pace in opening up the new frontiers.
Let's not credit crackers with blanket creativity. It's creativity of
a very limited, influential
nature. There are other kinds of creativity that crackers don't do or
even know about.
>
> And ... the Muslims, who never stop fucking and producing offsprings.- Hide quoted text -
If producing offspring is the marker for winners, then black Africa is
starting to win big-time.
So are the Hindoo doos.
Penang
> On Dec 5, 10:24 pm, Penang <kalamb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 4, 4:23 am, Gods and Monkeys <yeonsand...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 1. There is no "stability" anywhere.
>
> > Change is constant.
>
> Sure. But you only need a stable situation to get you to the next
> revolution.
> Niggers are the longest, oldest race, most ancient motherfuckers on
> Earth.
> Crackers can't escape them! They had an industrial, tech, space
> revolution
> to try, and the niggers are still up their asses! Amazing, ain't it?
>
> > 2. Nigger's "niche" isn't a niche. It's simply a stop-gap-measure.
>
> > Once the society progress enough, those low IQ and the mental case sub-
> > humans will be forever de-linked from the mainstream.
>
> > Kumbaya can only go so far.
>
> It's not just kumbaya. There's something very deep here. Women's need
> to
> suckle and nuture growing things for one! Also a patrician behavior
> inducing IQ stratification
> of roughly one standard deviation difference between North and South
> populations.
> Black America is on-board, like it or not.
If there ever is a graph depicting the human evolution, we are right
at the pivotal point of the "S-Curve".
Which means, the pace of evolution will shoot up, accelerated to the
Nth power.
The great divide of the North and South will get even more wider.
Maybe it's not my life time, nor yours, but our offsprings will
definitely witness the schism in between the "caste" of human race, in
terms of IQ.
Those from the low IQ group will eventually become "cows", be milked
for their physical agility, while those from the high IQ will continue
to venture into the unknown.
And in the world of the future (not long from now) there will be no
more tolerance of the disturbance of the low IQ group.
Extermination will become the answer to riots.
Gods and Monkeys
Hey, I like this idea. You mean like the NBA, NFL. The white/NE Asian/
Jew
owner audiences are "milking" the physical agility of black and low IQ
white
athletes. There's some truth to that. Watching the NFL, college
athletics is a
refreshing experience. The niggers can't even hold on to the cash the
earn beyond
a couple years of retirement. Fleeced by whores and money men.
> And in the world of the future (not long from now) there will be no
> more tolerance of the disturbance of the low IQ group.
>
> Extermination will become the answer to riots.
What about sex slavery. Black men become the toys for Asian and white
women.
SE Asian women become the toys for white and NE Asian men?
Happening as we speak. Islam will put up a good fight, but must
ultimately lose.
>
>
>
>
>
RichAsianKid
The process of 'white destruction' will likely be via the venues of (1)
mass immigration (2) differential birth rates and (3) intermarriage.
That is, assimilation combined with demographic displacement, rather
than outright elimination.
And on those three respects East Asian societies are way 'healthier'
than gentile white societies. Citizenship is a rather difficult process
to NE Asia, in fact as you probably know in Korea immigrants are not
eligible for citizenship or even permanent residency unless they are
married to a South Korean citizen or have invested more than $5 million
US into the local economy. And "Kosians" or "Onnurians", let alone mixed
Asian-black offspring, are looked down on and frowned upon (and rightly
so). And recently Japan started paying *culturally*-foreign Japanese to
go back to Brazil during the economic downturn, i.e. these are
ethnically and racially Japanese and yet they're still seen as
undesirable. Social as well as political pressures thus act as a
powerful immune mechanism against the process of 'xenografting' if not
outright parasitism.
This is reflected in other Asian societies too, vis-a-vis gentile white
societies, in terms of mating habits. You see very very few Asian women
sleeping with blacks, and on those rare occasions that they do, and on
ever rarer occasions where they sire offspring, almost invariably
there's an unspoken American passport lurking behind. It'd be difficult
to imagine throngs of Asian women throwing themselves to poor illiterate
Botswana men, for example, just to get their hourly dose of sex. In fact
the idea of miscegenation with blacks is probably considered by most
Asian women not just undesirable but downright repulsive - so much so
that blacks have been refused service at Thai massage parlors and
prostitute joints.
As for that moral question that you raised,NE Asians do not owe blacks
anything. There was never that history of colonization or conquest of
Africa comparable to that of Europe and Britain, nor was there a history
of slavery comparable to that of America. The moral leash that blacks
are now so successfully able to strangle whites with simply doesn't hold
in the case of Asia. But to the extent that this possibility should be
avoided at all costs, good fences still make good neighbors, and one
more reason for my previous reply.
RichAsianKid
a.k.a. the new international upper, middle, and lower class?
Question: where do liberal Jews fit in?