Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
India’s Burma Problem
0 views
Skip to first unread message
pluto
Nov 1, 2007, 8:05:48 PM11/1/07
to
India’s Burma Problem
Tag it:Nava Thakuria
01 November 2007
The restive northeast region defies New Delhi as protests grow since the Burmese
crackdown
The carnage in Burma after the junta cracked down on widespread protests in
September and October appears to be stirring unrest in India’s own remote
northeastern states.
Surrounded by Nepal, Bhutan, Tibet, Burma and Bangladesh, the region is only
tenuously connected to India itself and has long been beset by numerous
insurgencies.
Bangladesh juts up to the north from the Indian Ocean, nearly severing the
region’s eight states from India itself. Scores of rebel groups in the area
have been fighting the government virtually since India’s independence from
Great Britain.
Despite the fact that New Delhi has created a separate ministry for the region
and begun building a wide range of infrastructure projects, public resentment
against the central government remains high. Indigenous activists complain that
the government is only interested in exploiting the region’s oil, coal, tea and
timber resources while remaining deaf to their needs. Armed groups also use the
jungles of northern Burma as their hideouts and training camps.
The northeast has a volatile stew of militant organizations, most of them
ethnically based and some so small that even the locals don’t know who they are.
According to some counts, there are as many as 35 such groups in Manipur, with
another 34 in Assam, many of them Islamist. Only the states of Arunchal Pradesh
and Mizoram are relatively free of rebel groups, perhaps because of Indian
infrastructure development efforts in the latter.
The sudden uprising in Burma has changed the scenario. While New Delhi has
maintained a studied silence on the junta’s crackdown, public meetings and
rallies in the northeast have condemned Burma’s military rulers and offered
support to pro-democracy icon Aung San Suu Kyi and her National League for
Democracy, which overwhelmingly won 1991 parliamentary elections whose results
were thrown out by the generals.
In recent weeks the northeast has seen a growing number of pro-democracy rallies
and conferences, prayer meetings, candelight vigils and other events that have
drawn tens of thousands of people. Nearly 20,000 assembled at Mawphlang, near
the Meghalaya capital of Shillong, for instance, urging New Delhi to intervene
in the Burmese crisis. Robert Kharshing, a Member of Parliament elected from
Meghalaya and one of the organizers of the public meeting said, "We want the
government to withdraw its present policy on Burma and extend support to the
democratic movement led by Suu Kyi."
Officials are unsure how much the anti-Burma sentiment is being transferred into
anti-New Delhi sentiment, but the possibility is growing. Some 40,000 Chin
refugees from Burma have settled in the tiny state of Mizoram since the 1988
democracy uprising was crushed. Although the Chin have not been recognized by
the United Nations High Commission for Refugees, they lead a relatively
comfortable existence in Mizoram, since the Chin and India’s Mizo peoples share
similar linguistic and religious traditions.
New Delhi has responded to the restive region with ambitious efforts to build
infrastructure. The famed Stillwell Road, which passed through some of the
toughest terrain in the world during World War II as a vital link between Burma
and India, is being rescued from ruin and will be reopened and repaved. In 2001,
then-Foreign Minister Jaswant Singh inaugurated the construction of a road
connecting the Burmese towns of Kalewa and Tamu with Moreh in Manipur, one of
three historic trade routes linking the northeast to Burma.
New Delhi, even after inviting criticism for its strategic ties with Burma’s
military rulers, justifies its stand, emphasizing engagement rather than
alienation. During a recent visit to the northeast, External Affairs Minister
Shri Pranab Mukherjee, reiterated that New Delhi had been involved “in a variety
of projects with Myanmar in diverse fields,” such as roads, railways,
telecommunications, IT, technology, and power.
"As a close and friendly neighbour, India hopes to see a peaceful, stable and
prosperous Myanmar, where all sections of people will be included in a broad
based process of national reconciliation and political reform," Mukherjee said,
using the junta’s name for the country.
The foreign minister's comments invited criticism from many. "India cannot take
a contradictory position on democracy in the region by advocating it for
Afghanistan and Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh, Bhutan and not least for
Nepal – and stay silent on its other large neighbour, Burma," Sanjoy Hazarika,
an author and filmmaker, told Asia Sentinel. "We can no longer say that Burma's
turmoil is that country's internal politics. It directly impacts our security
and economic interests in the northeast, not to speak of larger national
concerns."
Certainly India, which was supportive of the pro-democracy movement in Burma
until 1993, has legitimate concerns on its eastern flank, given growing Chinese
influence in Burma. Burma, with proven reserves of about 2.5 trillion cubic
meters of natural gas, is being pursued feverishly by India and China, both of
which are starved for energy. But an Indo-Burma gas pipeline, projected to pass
through Bangladesh and which was regarded by New Delhi as an economic
opportunity for the northeast, has been put on hold.
A destabilized Burma is causing problems for the northeast on various fronts,
says Hiten Mahatna, a Guwahati-based political analyst. Not only is the region
bearing the brunt of Burmese refugees, its residents have been exposed to
illegal drugs and arms trafficked from the country. With Burma’s proximity and
high HIV/AIDS rates, Manipur has become one of the highest HIV-infected states
in India, and its youth are falling prey to drugs illegally supplied from
Burma’s Golden Triangle, says Mahatna.
"New Delhi cannot overlook these troubles. In fact, it is in the northeast’s
interest to have a stable regime in Burma. Being the largest democracy in the
globe, we obviously want a democratic government there," Mahatna said.
Comments (0)
as
============================================================
>>[IN REPLYING/DETERING TROLLS PLEASE DELETE THIS CROSSPOST]
============================================================
Tag it:Nava Thakuria
01 November 2007
The restive northeast region defies New Delhi as protests grow since the Burmese
crackdown
The carnage in Burma after the junta cracked down on widespread protests in
September and October appears to be stirring unrest in India’s own remote
northeastern states.
Surrounded by Nepal, Bhutan, Tibet, Burma and Bangladesh, the region is only
tenuously connected to India itself and has long been beset by numerous
insurgencies.
Bangladesh juts up to the north from the Indian Ocean, nearly severing the
region’s eight states from India itself. Scores of rebel groups in the area
have been fighting the government virtually since India’s independence from
Great Britain.
Despite the fact that New Delhi has created a separate ministry for the region
and begun building a wide range of infrastructure projects, public resentment
against the central government remains high. Indigenous activists complain that
the government is only interested in exploiting the region’s oil, coal, tea and
timber resources while remaining deaf to their needs. Armed groups also use the
jungles of northern Burma as their hideouts and training camps.
The northeast has a volatile stew of militant organizations, most of them
ethnically based and some so small that even the locals don’t know who they are.
According to some counts, there are as many as 35 such groups in Manipur, with
another 34 in Assam, many of them Islamist. Only the states of Arunchal Pradesh
and Mizoram are relatively free of rebel groups, perhaps because of Indian
infrastructure development efforts in the latter.
The sudden uprising in Burma has changed the scenario. While New Delhi has
maintained a studied silence on the junta’s crackdown, public meetings and
rallies in the northeast have condemned Burma’s military rulers and offered
support to pro-democracy icon Aung San Suu Kyi and her National League for
Democracy, which overwhelmingly won 1991 parliamentary elections whose results
were thrown out by the generals.
In recent weeks the northeast has seen a growing number of pro-democracy rallies
and conferences, prayer meetings, candelight vigils and other events that have
drawn tens of thousands of people. Nearly 20,000 assembled at Mawphlang, near
the Meghalaya capital of Shillong, for instance, urging New Delhi to intervene
in the Burmese crisis. Robert Kharshing, a Member of Parliament elected from
Meghalaya and one of the organizers of the public meeting said, "We want the
government to withdraw its present policy on Burma and extend support to the
democratic movement led by Suu Kyi."
Officials are unsure how much the anti-Burma sentiment is being transferred into
anti-New Delhi sentiment, but the possibility is growing. Some 40,000 Chin
refugees from Burma have settled in the tiny state of Mizoram since the 1988
democracy uprising was crushed. Although the Chin have not been recognized by
the United Nations High Commission for Refugees, they lead a relatively
comfortable existence in Mizoram, since the Chin and India’s Mizo peoples share
similar linguistic and religious traditions.
New Delhi has responded to the restive region with ambitious efforts to build
infrastructure. The famed Stillwell Road, which passed through some of the
toughest terrain in the world during World War II as a vital link between Burma
and India, is being rescued from ruin and will be reopened and repaved. In 2001,
then-Foreign Minister Jaswant Singh inaugurated the construction of a road
connecting the Burmese towns of Kalewa and Tamu with Moreh in Manipur, one of
three historic trade routes linking the northeast to Burma.
New Delhi, even after inviting criticism for its strategic ties with Burma’s
military rulers, justifies its stand, emphasizing engagement rather than
alienation. During a recent visit to the northeast, External Affairs Minister
Shri Pranab Mukherjee, reiterated that New Delhi had been involved “in a variety
of projects with Myanmar in diverse fields,” such as roads, railways,
telecommunications, IT, technology, and power.
"As a close and friendly neighbour, India hopes to see a peaceful, stable and
prosperous Myanmar, where all sections of people will be included in a broad
based process of national reconciliation and political reform," Mukherjee said,
using the junta’s name for the country.
The foreign minister's comments invited criticism from many. "India cannot take
a contradictory position on democracy in the region by advocating it for
Afghanistan and Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh, Bhutan and not least for
Nepal – and stay silent on its other large neighbour, Burma," Sanjoy Hazarika,
an author and filmmaker, told Asia Sentinel. "We can no longer say that Burma's
turmoil is that country's internal politics. It directly impacts our security
and economic interests in the northeast, not to speak of larger national
concerns."
Certainly India, which was supportive of the pro-democracy movement in Burma
until 1993, has legitimate concerns on its eastern flank, given growing Chinese
influence in Burma. Burma, with proven reserves of about 2.5 trillion cubic
meters of natural gas, is being pursued feverishly by India and China, both of
which are starved for energy. But an Indo-Burma gas pipeline, projected to pass
through Bangladesh and which was regarded by New Delhi as an economic
opportunity for the northeast, has been put on hold.
A destabilized Burma is causing problems for the northeast on various fronts,
says Hiten Mahatna, a Guwahati-based political analyst. Not only is the region
bearing the brunt of Burmese refugees, its residents have been exposed to
illegal drugs and arms trafficked from the country. With Burma’s proximity and
high HIV/AIDS rates, Manipur has become one of the highest HIV-infected states
in India, and its youth are falling prey to drugs illegally supplied from
Burma’s Golden Triangle, says Mahatna.
"New Delhi cannot overlook these troubles. In fact, it is in the northeast’s
interest to have a stable regime in Burma. Being the largest democracy in the
globe, we obviously want a democratic government there," Mahatna said.
Comments (0)
as
============================================================
>>[IN REPLYING/DETERING TROLLS PLEASE DELETE THIS CROSSPOST]
============================================================
pluto
Nov 1, 2007, 10:46:27 PM11/1/07
to
L.KYs Mother
Nov 3, 2007, 10:35:19 PM11/3/07
to
burma is chinese territory.
"pluto" <pl...@yahoo.com.sg> wrote in message news:ur3li3h9fg5sd36st...@4ax.com...
> Nepal - and stay silent on its other large neighbour, Burma," Sanjoy Hazarika,
0 new messages