Constitutional assemblies are convened to write new constitutions. When
Zelaya published that decree to initiate an "opinion poll" about the
possibility of convening a national assembly, he contravened the
unchangeable articles of the Constitution that deal with the prohibition
of reelecting a president and of extending his term. His actions showed
intent.
Our Constitution takes such intent seriously. According to Article 239:
"No citizen who has already served as head of the Executive Branch can be
President or Vice-President. Whoever violates this law _or proposes its
reform_ [emphasis added], as well as those that support such violation
directly or indirectly, will immediately cease in their functions and will
be unable to hold any public office for a period of 10 years."
<much more:>
http://www.csmonitor.com/2009/0702/p09s03-coop.html
But the OAS, US and EU know better, right? it was a "military coup",
right? time to force Honduras, through penury, starvation or military
assault, to violate their own Constitution, right?
--
Vulgarity consists in taking opinions on trust from others,
without weighing the merits of the cases.
< Hazlitt
En Espanol:
CONSTITUCION DE LA REPUBLICA DE HONDURAS 1982
(Decreto No. 131 del 11 de enero de 1982)
. . . .
ARTICULO 239.- El ciudadano que haya desempeñado la titularidad del Poder
Ejecutivo no podrá ser Presidente o Designado. El que quebrante esta
disposición o proponga su reforma, así como aquellos que lo apoyen
directa o indirectamente, cesarán de inmediato en el desempeño de sus
respectivos cargos, y quedarán inhabilitados por diez años para el
ejercicio de toda función pública.
http://pdba.georgetown.edu/Constitutions/Honduras/hond82.html
--
Io non giudico né giudicheròmai essere difetto
difendere alcuna opinione con le ragioni,
sanza volervi usare o l'autorità o la forza.
< Machiavelli
You can't believe Muslims, they lie about everything, it is their
religion, it is what they do and probably the only thing they are good
at.
Do you have any idea what planet you're on?
--
We have here got quite beyond the reach of our
faculties.
< _Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion_
> On Jul 2, 4:09 pm, mimus <tinmimu...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:45:16 -0400, mimus wrote:
>>
>>> On June 26, President Zelaya issued a decree ordering all government
>>> employees to take part in the "Public Opinion Poll to convene a National
>>> Constitutional Assembly." In doing so, Zelaya triggered a constitutional
>>> provision that automatically removed him from office.
>>
>>> Constitutional assemblies are convened to write new constitutions. When
>>> Zelaya published that decree to initiate an "opinion poll" about the
>>> possibility of convening a national assembly, he contravened the
>>> unchangeable articles of the Constitution that deal with the prohibition
>>> of reelecting a president and of extending his term. His actions showed
>>> intent.
>>
>>> Our Constitution takes such intent seriously. According to Article 239:
>>> "No citizen who has already served as head of the Executive Branch can be
>>> President or Vice-President. Whoever violates this law _or proposes its
>>> reform_ [emphasis added], as well as those that support such violation
>>> directly or indirectly, will immediately cease in their functions and will
>>> be unable to hold any public office for a period of 10 years."
>>
>>> <much more:>
>>
>>> http://www.csmonitor.com/2009/0702/p09s03-coop.html
>>
>>> But the OAS, US and EU know better, right? it was a "military coup",
>>> right? time to force Honduras, through penury, starvation or military
>>> assault, to violate their own Constitution, right?
I see the UN General Assembly has voted to pressure Honduras to violate
its Constitution on behalf of Zelaya, now, too.
It's obviously "pile onto the little country" time for all the lying
hyenas around the world.
In the meantime, Zelaya is promising to punish the "coup-plotters" and
demanding "strong action" by the US to reinstate him . . . .
>> En Espanol:
>>
>> CONSTITUCION DE LA REPUBLICA DE HONDURAS 1982
>>
>> (Decreto No. 131 del 11 de enero de 1982)
>>
>> . . . .
>>
>> ARTICULO 239.- El ciudadano que haya desempeñado la titularidad del Poder
>> Ejecutivo no podrá ser Presidente o Designado. El que quebrante esta
>> disposición o proponga su reforma, así como aquellos que lo apoyen
>> directa o indirectamente, cesarán de inmediato en el desempeño de sus
>> respectivos cargos, y quedarán inhabilitados por diez años para el
>> ejercicio de toda función pública.
>>
>> http://pdba.georgetown.edu/Constitutions/Honduras/hond82.html
>
> For readers who may be convinced by the arguments of this stupid
> fascist fuck you should know that this Constitution was enacted when
> death squads in Honduras were operating with impunity.
Nice finessing of subject.
Ironically, I imagine that Article 239 was drafted with _right-wingers_ in
mind, Honduras at that time just coming out of a long period of
military dictatorship, and no-one at that time surely being able to
foresee Chavismo and Chavistas.
> I have made a lot of posts condemning Columbia for its deplorable
> human rights record and shit disturbing, but to its credit even the
> government of Columbia has denounced this coup.
How many posts have you made condemning Chavez's Venezuela for its
deplorable human rights record etc.?
And it's "Colombia" with two "os".
Unless you're talking about the District of Columbia, which likewise has
a deplorable human rights record etc.
--
And now the saints began their reign,
For which th' had yearned so long in vain,
And felt such bowel-hankerings,
To see an empire, all of kings,
Delivered from th' Egyptian awe
Of justice, government and law.
< _Hudibras_
Which comes first, democracy or a fucking piece of paper?
There are a lot of countries where voting is illegal and they are usually
run by tin pot dictators.
I think the people who best know how to run the place are the civilians
through voting, not a piece of fucking scrap paper with some scribbles on
it. The "constitution" is not the be all and end all.