>>>ການເຊັນສັນຍາສ້າງຕັ້ງສາຍພົວພັນການທູດລະຫວ່າງ ສປປ ລາວ ແລະ ຕວກກີ ແຕ່ວັນທີ 20 ມິຖຸນາ 1958 ເປັນຕົ້ນມາ.<<<
ອັນຕອນເຣີ່ມສັນຍາ ມີຄວາມພົວພັນກັນຣະຫ່ວາງປະເທດລາວ ແລະ ເທິກກິ້ ຫັ້ນ ແມ່ນ
ເຣີ່ມຕົ້ນແຕ່ ສມັຍ ຣັດທະບານຣາຊອານາຈັກລາວ ເດີນັ້ນ ບໍແມ່ນ ສປປລາວ.
ເວົ້າອິຫຍັງ ກໍເວົ້າໃຫ້ມັນຖືກແນ່ ຢ່າຊູ່ເວົ້າ ເອົາໃຈ ໂຕເອງ ຫລາຍ.
"felicitations," indeed! shic, ole european semantics invoked to
describe mindless tasks performed by mindless bureaucrats who hardly
knows their feet from their head but who have big "heads" (purported
to contain big, complex brains) who are working a life time, patiently
to move up the ladder of power....
'tis the problem with small people and societies: the don't produce
imaginative, creating, daring, and intelligent people who dream of
big, "impossible" dreams: what small societies and people and isolated
regimes are good at is producing, at best, extremely mediocre
bureaucrats and technocrats --- virtually interchangeable, at the
discretion of the top dog in the chain of command of the ONLY allowed
ideology in charge of society --- who IMAGINE they, being so hard
working and smart, are doing leaps and bounds to uplift and to advance
their society and people....
but, in reality, what MOST of these mediocre workers and their
"powerful and wise bosses" are doing are mostly smoking expensive
cigars, picking their noses, partying, and reading WHO are THOSE what
so stupid & deviant as to be perpetually TRYING to insulting their
(said mediocre bureaucrats)'s intelligence, accomplishments, ad
nauseam....
Matthew C.R. Craven in his book "The Problem of State Succession and
the Identity of States under International Law"
wrote:
Although in recent years the issue of state succession has once again
assumed a prominence in international legal practice, there remains
considerable doubt and confusion as to the content and application of
relevant rules and principles. The problem, it is argued, is not so
much the lack of state practice, but a failure to appreciate fully the
conceptual problems that underlie the construction of doctrine. In an
attempt to clarify matters, this article reflects upon two categories
of problems that raise continuing difficulties: problems of substance
and methodology, and problems of analytical structure. In each case it
is argued that the heart of the problem lies in the approach taken as
regards the creation, assumption or Imposition of legal obligation In
International law, and In the 'construction' of the legal subject It
Is the latter point which is taken up in thefinal section, where an
attempt is made to illustrate why international law needs to
incorporate within its terms a substantive, rather than merely a
formal, conception of the state, and to show how otherwise it Is
incapable of explaining legal continuity in times of radical change.
......
The book went on:
The lack of common agreement on some of the central Issues in the law
of state succession has become particularly evident in the wake of the
territorial/political changes in Central and Eastern Europe,6
particularly following the 'dissolution' of the USSR,7 Yugoslavia,8
and Czechoslovakia,9 and the unification of Germany.10 It remains
unclear, for example, whether and to what extent the Federal Republic
of Yugoslavia (Serbia-Montenegro) remains bound by the treaties of the
former Yugoslavia.11 If it is not accepted as the 'continuation' of
the former Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (as indeed is
implied by its exclusion from participation in the UN12), can it still
be considered to be a party to the Genocide Convention and thereby
found the jurisdiction of the ICJ in the present case?13 If it is a
party to the Convention, as the Court seems to have assumed, there is
a need for further consideration as to why that is the case
(especially as it has not issued a notification of succession). The
position is all the more confused since some element of continuity
appears to be accepted in the practice of treaty depositaries, while
actively opposed by certain states.14
As far as Lao PDR is concerned, this subject has been crystal clear
since the Proclamation of the Lao PDR which declared that the Lao PDR
recognized all international treaties and Convents signed and ratified
by the Kingdom of Laos.
And of course, it is obvious that the continuator is: the Lao People's
Democratic Republic.
Sok dee