On Thursday, June 28, 2012 11:46:23 PM UTC-5, ລາວພວນ ລາວຮັກຊາດ wrote:
> > It is a common knowledge that people who are very anti-gay are they themselves gay or have gay/homosexual/lesbian leaning tendencies.
> >
> > They are publicly anti gay, anti homosexuality ONLY to try to falsify their real, inner confused and unsured and, to them, troublesome, gayness.
> >
> > People who don't have problem with other people's sexual leanings, REGARDLESS what "others" want out of their sexuality... such people are comfortable with their own sexuality and don't feel threatened, confused, or perplexed ABOUT OTHERS sexuality.
> >
> > Common basic knowledge.
> >
> > Of course, a small minority is ALWAYS AGAINST OTHERS, simply because others are "others, not us:" ---- because they are blacks, whites, gay, asians, women, what-not... but those are ignorant, uneducated knuckleheads...
>
> I'm sorry Herlao, I never thought that high educated man like you be
> Hgay..
+++++++++++++++++
A couple unrelated points --- which, if a person is decently intelligent, are not hard to REALIZE they're not connected:
#1. Being intelligent and being gay or being heterosexual or being bisexual HAVE NO CORRELATION.
(Actually, for the brighter folks, I should use a more meaningful phrasing: there is NO STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT correlation between someone's intelligence and what sexual preference they engage in.)
#2. Her Lao is NOT gay. However ..... and here I know Lao Puan's English is not sufficient enough to grasp but I will throw it out, strung in this sentence anway ...... however, IF I WERE, the issue would be NEITHER relevant NOR important.
Nor indeed, would I be angry, embarrased, or terrified.... "being found out" or "outed".... if I WERE...
Again, people who are very anti-gay/homosexual are, to good degree, if not entirely.... gay themselves... so they go the extra miles to TRY TO CONVINCE the world they are "normal, just like you."
(I don't mean to be teaching Puan basic English in SCL.. but, Puan... if you CAME across a phrase or a sentence like, "If I WERE...." it means it is a SUBJUNCTIVE statement or observation: meaning it is NOT possible. For examples,
"If I WERE dead..."
"If I WERE you..."
"If I WERE the most intelligent and richest person on earth..."
In English, which is a pretty precise language, when you start with a SUBJUNCTIVE claus or observation like that, it means YOU ARE NOT (dead, the other person, or the richest and most intellient person on earth)....
#3. Take notice of the MANY Conservative Republicans, Conservative "burn in hell and die eternal death you sick homosexual" preachers in the SOUTH... people who teach their small children to go as to go to DEAD soldiers funerals and hold up signs, saying: "Jesus hates homosexuals!"
THOSE ARE THE REALLY SICK, mentally sick, sick pyschotic people. But they get together in large group, talking in gibberish tonques about hell, heaven, and their IMAGINARY CREATOR of the universe and *think* they are really smart, knowledgeable, and such.
'Tis ONE of the really big problems with the HUMAN SPECIES: the really mediocre, stupid, and uneducated are those who go fucking around a lot, like mindless chimps, and have a lot of offspring, and they perpetuate that level of general stupidity and ignorance: but being in groups, holding hands, they don't know how stupid, ignorant, or uneducated they really are.
Again, there's deep truth to the observation that when people are stupid and uneducated enough, they CAN NOT--- intellectually --- assess their level of stupidity and ignorance.... so they *think* others who aren't like them are really the dumb and stupid and "abnormal" ones!
#4. Again, ALL these re disparate, unconnected items. They do not go together; if you think they have correlation, it's because you're not very bright, like Puan, an elderly man ready to go back to die in his birth country, as he walks around town gawking at young women and men, for what, we have no idea, since he likely requires erectile dysfunctional drugs to make the thing down there work...