Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Wives of Sheikh of Kuwait

334 views
Skip to first unread message

Nalinaksha Bhattacharyya

unread,
Feb 22, 1996, 3:00:00 AM2/22/96
to
It has been reported in some newsgroups that the Sheikh of Kuwait has a
practice of entering into marriage and divorcing other wives in such a
way so that at any time he has four legal wives. According to these
reports he has so far "married " 40 women in this manner.
I want to know if this report is authentic.

--
Nalinaksha Bhattacharyya

Hitman

unread,
Feb 23, 1996, 3:00:00 AM2/23/96
to
Nalinaksha Bhattacharyya wrote:
> I want to know if this report is authentic.

Why?? do you wish to try your luck?? he dont like foreigners :>

Sumy

unread,
Feb 23, 1996, 3:00:00 AM2/23/96
to
This myth was the creation of Western imagination and still
carries on. Maybe the reason is that it makes some kind of
pleasant dream for abnormal men. The reality is not so, I think,
in the case of the Kuwaiti Emir because most Arab men are accused
of the same.

In article <4ghacj$7...@nntp.ucs.ubc.ca>, Nalinaksha


Bhattacharyya (bha...@unixg.ubc.ca) writes:
>It has been reported in some newsgroups that the Sheikh of Kuwait has a
>practice of entering into marriage and divorcing other wives in such a
>way so that at any time he has four legal wives. According to these
>reports he has so far "married " 40 women in this manner.

>I want to know if this report is authentic.
>

>--
>Nalinaksha Bhattacharyya
>

Home Page
Arab Newsletter
http://www.ibmpcug.co.uk/~jano
Islam ..Blackmailed by Saudi Tantrums
WEEKLY QUIZ


Ali

unread,
Feb 23, 1996, 3:00:00 AM2/23/96
to
In article <4ghacj$7...@nntp.ucs.ubc.ca>,

bha...@unixg.ubc.ca (Nalinaksha Bhattacharyya) wrote:
>It has been reported in some newsgroups that the Sheikh of Kuwait has a
>practice of entering into marriage and divorcing other wives in such a
>way so that at any time he has four legal wives. According to these
>reports he has so far "married " 40 women in this manner.
>I want to know if this report is authentic.
>

Since people will respond to you, Islam allwed men to marry 4 women at a time
which in my beleive people abusing this rule because you have to be fair with
all your wifes and GOD said (S.W.) "if can not be fair; just one".

I think the question sould be?

if a man has 40 or 400 does he treat them all the same? does he sleeps; spend
time;has a feeling etc.. with his four wifes equally? including the new ones?
His TDMA (Time Division Multiple Access) should be pretty effecient!

Is Islam allow men to marry and put a condition that "the wife can not
re-marry after divorce"?. Ignoring her right to have sex rest of her life?
while men can do it any time they like? (since they can marry and divorce any
time).

What I beleive women should not allow this to happen. Should have a voice
against it, but mind you they don't have a right to vote yet!


WOMEN SHOULD HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE TREATED EQUALY AND FAIRLY.

Ali


Hitman

unread,
Feb 28, 1996, 3:00:00 AM2/28/96
to
> bha...@unixg.ubc.ca (Nalinaksha Bhattacharyya) wrote:
> I wouldn't even be surprised if they have more than 4 wives at a time.

Who cares??

Husam Alsamman

unread,
Mar 1, 1996, 3:00:00 AM3/1/96
to
In article <4ghacj$7...@nntp.ucs.ubc.ca> bha...@unixg.ubc.ca (Nalinaksha Bhattacharyya) writes:
>From: bha...@unixg.ubc.ca (Nalinaksha Bhattacharyya)
>Subject: Wives of Sheikh of Kuwait
>Date: 22 Feb 1996 08:44:03 GMT

>It has been reported in some newsgroups that the Sheikh of Kuwait has a
>practice of entering into marriage and divorcing other wives in such a
>way so that at any time he has four legal wives. According to these
>reports he has so far "married " 40 women in this manner.
>I want to know if this report is authentic.

>--
>Nalinaksha Bhattacharyya

Yes it is, and actually this is why the American placed him back in his
palace..i.e. to practice his fair behavior in choosing women, and not to keep
the Kuwati's oil and money flowing into the western banks.

Nizar B. Dahbar

unread,
Mar 2, 1996, 3:00:00 AM3/2/96
to
On Fri, 23 Feb 1996, Sumy wrote:

> Date: Fri, 23 FEB 1996 00:31:26 GMT
> From: Sumy <ja...@tina.win-uk.net>
> Newgroups: soc.culture.kuwait
> Subject: Re: Wives of Sheikh of Kuwait

>
> This myth was the creation of Western imagination and still
> carries on. Maybe the reason is that it makes some kind of
> pleasant dream for abnormal men. The reality is not so, I think,
> in the case of the Kuwaiti Emir because most Arab men are accused
> of the same.
>
> In article <4ghacj$7...@nntp.ucs.ubc.ca>, Nalinaksha
> Bhattacharyya (bha...@unixg.ubc.ca) writes:

> >It has been reported in some newsgroups that the Sheikh of Kuwait has a
> >practice of entering into marriage and divorcing other wives in such a
> >way so that at any time he has four legal wives. According to these
> >reports he has so far "married " 40 women in this manner.
> >I want to know if this report is authentic.
> >
> >--
> >Nalinaksha Bhattacharyya
> >
>

Actually, excluding numeric specifity, it is true. I dunno about
whether he (Sheikh Jaber) has constantly had 4 wives, but it is a fact
that he has many, MANY children from many, many different wives. This is
arguable whether it's against Islam's teaching's (probably not), but it's
become widespread and a topic of gossip simply because it RARELY ever
happens, even in royalty families in the Middle East.

***********************************************************************
* Nizar B. Dahbar \ / "WARNING: The surgeon general has declared *
* Computer Science \ / doing anything, anytime, anywhere, with *
* WPI '98 \/ anyone, may be hazardous to your health. *
* (508)831-6504 || Have a nice day." *
***********************************************************************


Kuwaitia

unread,
Mar 2, 1996, 3:00:00 AM3/2/96
to
In article <4fmand$4...@noc.tor.hookup.net> geo...@outer-net.com (Info)
writes:
>In article <Pine.SOL.3.91.960210205352.2867B-100000-100000@obelix>,
>considered as "nashez" <-- (that's an arabic word to which i ignore the
>English equivalent), and is prosecuted under the law;
The english equivalent for 'nashez' would be disobedient, rebellious,
recalcitrant, etc. etc. Much has been said about what is 'nushooz'. I
having personally read al-Tabari's explanation of this word in his
'jami al-bayaa fi taweel-al-Qur'an', can testify that a wife's
refusal to deny her husband's request for sexual intercourse constitutes
nushooz. Mr.Fuad Haddad on SRI corrected me to say that it's only when
the wife has a legitimate excuse. We all know the relevant verse
about nushooz by now, so I will not dwell on it. Here are a few
aHadeeth (for non-Arabophones, it's the plural of 'Hadith') directly from
'Riyadh-al-Saliheen' by al-Nawawi. They are all, "Sahih" by the way:
1) A woman should satisfy her husband even if it's on the back of a camel.
2) A woman who doesn't respond to a husband's call (for sex) is cursed
by angels.
3) If God had allowed prostration before humans, I would have ordered a
wife
to prostrate before her husband.

>* A woman cannot divorce her husband, unless it's agreed pre-nuptially
that
>she can (al esma). However, no "honorable" man normally accepts such an
>agreement, and it is a barely practised norm that you only hear about as
a
>joke in movies. Unlikewise, a man can divorce at any time, at his
>convenience;
Yes. A woman CANNOT get divorce from her husband if he's impotent, unless
he has a chance to try to impregnate her for a year. A woman CANNOT get
divorce under Islamic law if the marriage is consummated! If you want
references, I will be glad to give them.

>* A man is allowed, even advised, to *beat* his wife to "straighten" her
up;
>* A man can have more than one wife, obviously that doesn't work the
other
>way around;
Both true, although people will dispute whether it's advised or just
allowed and some will even try to water down the meaning of 'daraba'.

>* If a woman is cought cheating on her husband, the husband would be
>justified by the law of the state for killing her "in defense of his
>honour", again, doesn't go both ways;
That I think is not under Islamic law really. The husband can bring
up the case against the wife in a court, and if she's found guilty,
she WILL be executed via stoning. It is interesting to note here that
stoning is never mentioned in the Qur'an. However, there is a tradition
from A'isha that Umar said that there was a verse regarding 'stoning'.
For example, see Ibn Ishaq's Sirat-al-Rasool-Allah.

>* The husband can force his wife to wear religious clothing (hejab);
That is ABSOLUTELY true and Islamic.

>P.S. a common thing that happens in these debates is that someone picks
on
>one, usually unessential, point to water down a whole multi-point
argument.
>Am I to expect this to happen?
True. This is what has been frustrating me all along. Very often we see
posts where people say that some 'aalim' can answer all these questions
that they don't know about. Frankly, I have a very low opinion of people
who do not ask the questions themselves and try answering them instead
of holding blind faith in the opinion of some 'aalim'.

Nadia
O God, cause us to see things as they really are --- Hadith

0 new messages