Annotation of the above MP3:
I encourage everyone to listen to the above 46-minute interview from a
'white nationalist'/'race-realist' perspective from an interview from
Mississipi.
There are lots that I can comment on (feel free to ask).
But one item stood out in the discussion: Jews.
Jared, born in Japan, is more a pragmatic man, and tries to rally whites
collectively and doesn't really want to raise the Jewish question which
will split the movement he has been trying to forge. Yet the honest host
pounds on.
Towards the end of the interview (listen for yourself), even even this
inimitable Mr. Taylor who classifies himself as a 'race realist' dared
not speak the unspeakable even though it's often mentioned with respect
to whites vs blacks: the question of high Ashkenazi Jewish IQ - which,
from studies, indicate it's anywhere 1/2 to a whole deviation about
white norms (with profile skewed towards the verbal) and which
effectively explains why gentile whites, no matter how hard they try,
will never match per capita with Ashkenazi Jews in an open and fair
competition.
Ooops.
Which in part explains the latter's dominance in so many parts of America.
To his credit, Taylor agrees that the East Asian IQ is higher than
whites', and of course, the lower black and Hispanic IQs are very well
broadcasted.
But the high Jewish IQ *in combination* with Jewish dominance (which he
admits to with respect to Hollywood and the media) AND whose interests
may not exactly align with those of America's let alone Christian America's?
That's one hot potato even a smart 'race realist', let alone other
'white nationalists', is not equipped to handle.....
the Chinese " Jews " in Malaysia have a
higher IQ than the average Malays in Malaysia .
should Chinese rule the Malays ?
should Chinese in Malaysia change the name Malaysia into
Chinesia ?
On the subject of Malaysia, Jared Taylor, the interviewee, had this to
say and which is very well worth reading:
http://www.amren.com/ar/2008/10/index.html#cover
I think one way or another Chinese will end up ruling ASEAN if they
haven't done so already. I am not saying that "should" be the case. In
fact I think Rather I am just describing what I see, and what "is".
And the reason I say this is a simple one: Chinese compared to ASEAN has
both advantages in quality (measured by IQ) and, unlike Jews in America
or round the world, quantity.
This I gotta answer.
No, we Chinese don't want Asean. We don't need the land nor its
inhabitants.
We are there as guests, and yes, we treat ourselves as guests, staying
in hotel rooms.
You might be surprised to hear this, but this is our attitude.
For us, our home can be ANYWHERE. As long as we can make money,
educate our young, see that they become much better than us, that's
home.
And when that "home" turns ugly, we check out, and check into another
hotel.
We have no longing for China either. The people there just don't see
the world as we do.
Chinese have the right to take ASEAN ,......look at Tibet .
Chinese have the right to take Tibet .
n Dec 22, 8:57 am, "Jesus Christ , a long - term fucker of the
Prostitute St . Mary 's cunt hole , is an Unique Son of GOD"
I still think in a level-field competition Chinese trumps and will trump
ASEAN and its progeny, collectively speaking, in social valued outcomes.
That's not due to some secret volitional act of malice or subjugation;
rather it's just that some are more capable of goal-directed action,
read: have a better work ethic, are more disciplined, and just plainly
more competent (subsumed under the umbrella of the consequences of a
higher IQ); and as a consequence even under equal circumstances equal
outcomes can't be achieved because, hey, we're different. Much like
blacks and gentile whites and/or Jews. It would of course be 'better' -
in an imaginary and fantastical sense - for Asia as a whole if SE Asians
were just a tad smarter and a tad more efficient; they, sadly, just
aren't. It's an imperfect world we live in.
I do agree though Chinese don't want to "rule" ASEAN in the classic
European (and Christian) proselytizing sense. Think China - probably
convinced of its own superiority - even more convinced of its own
superiority - compared to Europeans - it built in ancient times still
the greatest and largest modern physical structure on earth - the Great
Wall - rather than going overboard trying to conquer and squash & quash
everything (every cockroach??) it felt or could. Keep those barbarians
out!!! Well, it reflects an even deeper conviction and self-confidence I
think: the adversary was deemed so low and and so unworthy they're
ultimately incorrigible & untouchable.
And as it turns out China may well have its final say - especially in
contrast to this supposedly end-product of 20th century neoconservative
univeralist democractic utopia. Look at where the US is today compared
to a few decades ago. Neither the West but even more specifically
neither neoconservatism recognized that very costly hidden downstream
price of empire which Chinese grasped eons ago.
We're not equal.
If you try to remake the world and make it look more like you, don't
be surprised one day you end up looking more like the world.
To be slightly more precise there is no such thing as "rights" which are
just manufactured (or...in the UN's case, declared) and which now are
metastasizing like crazy in the US. Ultimately in life there are only
winners and losers. "Rights" are merely a social device, merely
secondary. To crusade for it and to believe in it is to miss the point.
Right = Might .
I am heading to the midnite mass.
So I wish you, RAK, and your entire family and/or clan a very Merry
Christmas and a very fruitful New Year ahead !!
Let me also take the chance to wish everybody a very Merry Christmas
and Happy New Year !
>
> I still think in a level-field competition Chinese trumps and will trump
> ASEAN and its progeny, collectively speaking, in social valued outcomes.
In spite of the unfair competition, the Chinese are the
wealthiest in Malaysia, Thailand, the Philippines, Indonesia,
Singapore and all other member countries in ASEAN.
Judging from educational results, the Chinese are
the most intelligent, the smartest.. The top students are
always the Chinese.
Why ?
The Chinese have a much higher IQ than the natives.
things like this would not be allowed to happen in
Cambodia
most filipino senators in the Philippines are Chinese ,
this would not happen in Cambodia .
The Chinese were more intelligent than the Mongols and the Manchus,
but we all know the Mongols and Manchus conquered the
Chinese and ruled them for centuries.
Similarly, the more intelligent Chinese in Malaysia failed to control
the whole Malaysia, and will never do so.
The same can be said about the Jews. They may be very rich,
but the one who had all the say is Obama, a black man, not a jew.
With brains is not enough to rule the world,
you need to have survival and killer instincts,
and the drive to succeed at all cost.
The Chinese are smarter than the Jews, but they were less united
before. Now, the Chinese are united, and a united high IQ people are
going to rule the world for a day, as Bible seems to have insinuated.
>
> With brains is not enough to rule the world,
> you need to have survival and killer instincts,
> and the drive to succeed at all cost.
High IQs do very well on planet earth in every country.
High IQ Chinese do very well, low IQ Chinese do very bad.
High IQ blacks do very well too. Just not nearly as many
of them are high IQ. Killer instincts and the drive to succeed at
all costs always lead to failure. People see this in
you and will either punish you or not allow you any
opportunities to succeed, you will eventually grind down.
> Should the East repeat the West's mistakes?
China can start to solve its own (communistic) mistakes, which are of gigantic
proportions!
Peter
n Dec 25, 10:27 am, Peter Terpstra <pe...@dharma.dnsdojo.org> wrote:
> RichAsianKid in <hgk374$ud...@news.eternal-september.org> :
You are blind or ill informed.
Check all the really rich businessmen and tycoons...check
their origins ....where they come from ?
Don't be fooled by their Cambodian names.
You will find Chinese blood flowing in their vein.
Best wishes returned, and also don't forget the so-called War on
Christmas (not least by many Jews) in America....(should a Menorah be
side-by-side with a "Holiday Tree"? Why not celebrate Winter Solstice
instead etc.)
There may be a reason why a practical people such as Chinese/Chinese
government may frown upon blind religious ideology, in this case,
Christianity, unless they fulfill a real and tangible earthly purpose.
Think stem-cell transplant if you have cancer etc, or abortion if you
have a retarded kid etc, and then think how Christianity or some
midnight mass can save you and yours.
The aggregate IQ difference between Chinese & Malays are close to a
standard deviation, i.e. the 15-point white-black difference in the US,
and combined with a better work ethic it's not surprising social
outcomes correlate accordingly in SE Asian countries depending on ancestry.
This post brilliantly illustrates a type of blind statistical
illiteracy. First IQ is not end-all. It's only one factor which cannot
be ignored, and no doubt environmental factors matter. (Really? Are you
serious if you think North Koreans are congenitally more retarded than
South Koreans? etc.) But when you equalize environment, the
proportionate contribution of heredity i.e. IQ/genes/biology will
increasingly & proportionately come into play.
Second, it is not clear if Mongols and Manchus have lower IQ; in fact
Koreans and Japanese have equal, possibly marginally higher, IQ
than Chinese (esp with respect to SouthWestern Chinese/Tibetans).
Then also why is it that the NAACP had so many Jewish presidents in its
early days, and isn't the (imperfect) analogy here glaringly obvious,
i.e. who contributes the $, who's lurking the curtains etc, and who's
really the ostensible figurehead? How come Jews in spite of being
discriminated against (as they always agree) are now so much 'richer'
than gentiles? How is that possible that a perpetually discriminated
people outscore the host population.
I look forward to you answer, Mr. Tanki.
Hahahahahaaaaa!!!
"War is peace, Freedom is slavery, Ignorance is strength"....
Ironic it's now the free West that's now more Orwellian, no?
Ash Jews actually are the highest IQ ethnic group on earth, though
Sephardics' are much lower and Israel's IQ and its correlates (e.g. on
international test results) are still wanting. As for unity, Jews,
collectively, in spite of abundance in America, but stemming from their
perennial rootlessness and eternal sense of persecution, probably
haven't let their guard down quite yet, in spite of their widespread
co-mingling with gentile society (and which gentiles are consistently
being fooled about).
Its once again a very powerful testament of identity-politics (perhaps
even utility of religion in this case) where even decades and decades of
universalist social indoctrination can't quite dispel.
Of course some say they're actually the culprit but that's a subject for
a separate thread. :)
See and hear above repleted link again. What mistakes? Are you talking
process or outcome? Are you suggesting China should lose its identity
like the West and follow its garden path to destruction. Don't quite
understand here, please elaborate.
Gods & Monkeys:
Have you not noticed that classic "leftist" tactic so concretely
illustrated here by now:
(1) First delete that link and take things out of context:
(2) Second delete the rest of the newsgroups so you can't reply. It took
effort, you know.
I used to naively think once upon a time the "Left" of the West
was....., hey, er, soooooo universal.
You've got to realize there are times when not everything dangling in
front of you is carrot, and not all that glitters in front is gold.
A really high IQ person knows how to properly camouflage his/her
killer instinct.
Only a half-baked middle IQ person who thinks too high for him/herself
will let the killer instinct to ooze out in the open.
You sir, are not smarter than the nigger.
How are you going to start to compare with the Jews?
Have you bought insurance before?
Religion to me is insurance.
Nothing more. :D
Or just craving for one more parent.
Analogy's not quite apt though: insurance potentially pays off real &
concrete tangible benefits - at least in some cases; religion offers
nothing in return for everything.